The death cross is often viewed as an ultimate bearish signal. It occurs when a short-term moving average crosses below a long-term moving average.
Yet, Ethereum’s trading history suggests that both golden crosses (the opposite of death crosses) and death crosses can be misleading. They are not the be-all-end-all indicators many consider them to be. In fact, they often serve as mere blips in the grander scheme of market movements.
Source: Now, let’s delve into the liquidity aspect. , like many other cryptocurrencies, has been grappling with a lack of market traction. The volume and liquidity are not exactly painting a rosy picture. However, this is not a fundamental issue with Ethereum itself but rather a symptom of broader market conditions.
On the flip side, Ethereum has been showing signs of life in other areas. For instance, its Total Value Locked (TVL) has been on an upward trajectory, indicating that the network is far from stagnant. This suggests that the fundamentals are strong, even if the market indicators are currently less than ideal.
So, what’s the takeaway here? Ethereum’s recent death cross does not spell disaster. It is merely a chapter in a longer narrative that includes other factors like , volume and fundamental strength. While the market may be in a state of flux, Ethereum’s underlying technology and adoption metrics are robust.
This article was originally published on U.Today
Source: Cryptocurrency - investing.com
