in

Global accounting body wants to force companies to spell out takeover motives

© Reuters. © Reuters.

By Huw Jones

LONDON (Reuters) – A global accounting standard setter said it wants to force companies to spell out their thinking behind acquisitions to break new ground in making boards more answerable to shareholders.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) set out on Thursday possible rule changes after investors said they wanted more information on whether takeovers live up to expectations, which is not always the case.

“This is very much blue sky thinking,” said Sue Lloyd, vice chair of the IASB, which sets accounting rules that are mandatory in over 140 countries, including the European Union and Britain, but not the United States, which has its own standards.

It would be a first in terms of accounting standards, she said.

Under existing IASB rules, acquisitions are accounted for under an annual test to see if goodwill needs writing down, a reference to the value of intangible assets acquired when buying another company.

Investors have mixed views on whether this is a useful test of how an acquisition is performing, Lloyd said.

The IASB concluded against amending the goodwill standard, such as by reintroducing amortization or gradually writing down goodwill over time, she said.

Instead, it will supplement the existing goodwill standard with a new rule requiring disclosures on the performance of an acquisition in annual reports.

“The focus of this discussion paper is very much on a set of disclosures to help investors really understand acquisitions and whether they have gone well or not,” Lloyd said.

Companies would monitor a takeover and its performance for two years or explain to investors why they were not doing so.

To reduce the reporting burden, companies could “piggy back” on information management used for making an acquisition in the first place, she said.

Depending on feedback from a public consultation that lasts until September, more specific proposals would come later.

The aim is to shine a light on whether companies are increasing value to shareholders by making acquisitions at the price paid, and whether the touted benefits of the deal live up to expectations, Lloyd said.

“At the moment we don’t have a set of disclosures that provide that set of information,” she said.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

EU’s Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier says he has tested positive for the coronavirus

Olive Garden's parent Darden Restaurants beats on earnings but pulls outlook and dividend