The BoE shocked financial markets on Nov. 4 when its policymakers voted 7-2 to keep Bank Rate at 0.1%, even as it said inflation was heading towards 5%.
Many investors had read previous comments by Governor Andrew Bailey as meaning a November rate hike was extremely likely.
Since then, data has suggested the labour market withstood the end of the government’s furlough scheme – something the BoE wanted to see before any rate hike – and inflation hit a 10-year high of 4.2% in October.
But the emergence of the Omicron coronavirus variant has prompted some MPC officials to sound a new note of caution about the economy’s recovery, although Omicron could also add to inflation pressures by aggravating supply chain problems.
The BoE’s Monetary Policy Committee is due to announce its next policy decisions on Dec. 16 and Feb. 3.
MPC MEMBERS WHO ALMOST BACKED A RATE HIKE ON NOV. 4
ANDREW BAILEY, GOVERNOR
Dec. 1: “Direct economic effects of COVID have attenuated a lot since the fall in GDP in the second quarter of last year, when we went off a cliff,” Bailey said. “However, there are still impacts that we are feeling from COVID quite strongly.”
Nov. 20: “You’re in a fairly febrile world…. (The inflation picture) is two-sided. There are risks both ways. Obviously, our concern would be that if it gets into second-round effects, it could be elevated for longer.”
Nov. 15: “I’m very uneasy about the inflation situation…. On the (November) decision itself, however, it was a very close call in my view…. I think that the situation in the labour market is looking considerably tighter.”
HUW PILL, CHIEF ECONOMIST
Nov. 26: “In my view, the ground has now been prepared for policy action…. Incoming data support the conclusion that the recovery is continuing. Although supply disruptions weigh on activity, they also create inflationary pressures. The labour market is tight.”
POLICYMAKERS WHO VOTED TO RAISE RATES ON NOV. 4
MICHAEL SAUNDERS, EXTERNAL MPC MEMBER
Dec. 3: “At present, given the new Omicron COVID variant has only been detected quite recently, there could be particular advantages in waiting to see more evidence on its possible effects on public health outcomes and hence on the economy. But continued delay also could be costly.”
DAVE RAMSDEN, DEPUTY GOVERNOR (MARKETS & BANKING)
Nov. 5: “That move in the UK (inflation expectations) above, and materially above, what was a relatively stable historical average, has been something I’ve been concerned about.”
SOUNDING MORE WORRIED ABOUT INFLATION PRESSURES
BEN BROADBENT, DEPUTY GOVERNOR (MONETARY POLICY)
Dec. 6: “The aggregate rate of inflation is likely to rise further over the next few months and the chances are that it will comfortably exceed 5% when the Ofgem (regulator) cap on retail energy prices is next adjusted in April.”
“It’s more likely than not – looking a couple of years ahead as we should – that these pressures on traded goods prices are more likely to subside than intensify.”
But Broadbent also said the jobs market could prove a source of inflation.
SOUNDING LESS WORRIED ABOUT INFLATION THREAT CATHERINE MANN, EXTERNAL MEMBER
Nov. 30: “It’s premature to … even talk about timing (of a rate hike), much less how much.”
SILVANA TENREYRO, EXTERNAL MEMBER
Nov. 24: “We’re learning about critical parts of the economy in coming months. My personal decision will be informed by that. I see myself as thinking more in, you know, (the) medium term.”
JONATHAN HASKEL, EXTERNAL MEMBER
Nov. 23: Haskel said he was in “team transitory” on the question of inflation’s persistence. However, there was a risk that wage growth could exceed productivity growth, which has been weak in Britain for more than a decade.
NOT SPOKEN ON MONETARY POLICY RECENTLY
JON CUNLIFFE, DEPUTY GOVERNOR (FINANCIAL STABILITY)
July 14: “We’re seeing a surge in demand. We’re seeing some constrictions in supply that’s driving inflation. How persistent is that (is the) clear question… We would expect some of these pressures, and we would expect transitory pressures at this stage.”
Source: Economy - investing.com
