WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. goods exports to China fell in December, cementing a massive shortfall in Beijing’s two-year purchase commitments under the “Phase 1” trade deal negotiated by former President Donald Trump’s administration.
The U.S. Census Bureau said on Tuesday that the United States’ 2021 goods trade deficit with China rose by $45 billion, or 14.5%, to $355.3 billion, the largest since a 2018 record of $418.2 billion.
The 2020 gap was $310.3 billion, a 10-year low driven by coronavirus pandemic lockdowns.
The global U.S. trade deficit in 2021 surged 27% https://www.reuters.com/business/us-trade-deficit-rises-december-deficit-2021-largest-record-2022-02-08 to a record $859.1 billion as businesses restocked inventories to meet robust demand.
NO EXTRA PURCHASES
The data showed China missed by far its commitments to purchase an additional $200 billion worth of U.S. farm and manufactured goods, energy and services above 2017 levels – the year before a bitter trade war embroiled the world’s two largest economies.
The purchase commitments were the centerpiece of Trump’s Phase 1 trade deal https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/phase%20one%20agreement/Economic_And_Trade_Agreement_Between_The_United_States_And_China_Text.pdf with China, which launched in mid-February 2020 and halted a threatened escalation of tariffs.
The deal also called for China to grant increased U.S. market access to its agricultural biotechnology and financial services sectors and mandated some intellectual property protection improvements.
An analysis of final 2021 Census trade data compiled by economist Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute for International Economics showed China met just 57% of its full two-year goods and services targets.
Beijing’s purchases of the goods, energy and services targeted in the Phase 1 agreement were not even enough to return to China’s baseline 2017 level of purchases of U.S. imports after retaliatory tariffs had eroded them in 2018 and 2019, he said.
“Put differently, China bought none of the additional $200 billion of exports Trump’s deal had promised,” Bown said in his analysis https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economic-issues-watch/china-bought-none-extra-200-billion-us-exports-trumps-trade.
China exceeded the 2017 baseline in agricultural purchases, but only reached 83% of the $73.9 billion two-year farm goods target, Bown’s analysis showed.
Services exports to China, which had been a bright spot for U.S. trade, fell sharply as the pandemic slashed Chinese tourism and business travel to the United States and cut the flow of Chinese students to U.S. universities, reaching only 52% of the target.
The U.S. Trade Representative’s office and China’s embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to queries about the data.
Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Sarah Bianchi said last week it was “really clear that the Chinese haven’t met their commitment in Phase 1” and the Biden administration was working with Chinese officials https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-trade-official-says-china-failed-meet-phase-1-commitments-2022-02-01 to address the matter.
SERIOUS INTENT
U.S. officials also told Reuters early on Monday they wanted concrete action https://www.reuters.com/business/exclusive-us-calls-concrete-action-china-meet-phase-1-purchase-commitments-2022-02-07 from Beijing to close the shortfall in its purchase commitments and would continue current talks if Chinese officials “show serious intent to reach an agreement on their purchase commitments.”
China has sought the removal of tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of goods that were left in place by the Phase 1 deal.
The agreement contains a clause that the two parties “project that the trajectory of increases” in China’s purchases “will continue in calendar years 2022 through 2025” without specific targets.
Former USTR chief of staff Jamieson Greer, who helped negotiate the Phase 1 deal, said that clause could be used to pursue “retrospective enforcement for what’s been missed.”
“It’s in the interest of the administration to pursue enforcement,” said Greer, a trade lawyer with King and Spalding.
“With a few kind of narrow exceptions, we haven’t really seen that much enforcement” on trade matters from the Biden administration, he added.
Source: Economy - investing.com
