“We really didn’t have a choice at that point. Delisting every asset other than bitcoin, which by the way is not what the law says, would have essentially meant the end of the crypto industry in the U.S.,” Armstrong told the FT.
“It kind of made it an easy choice … let’s go to court and find out what the court says,” he added.
The SEC had accused Coinbase of operating illegally because it failed to register as an exchange. It also alleged that Coinbase traded at least 13 crypto assets that are securities that should have been registered, including tokens such as Solana, Cardano and Polygon.
The SEC told the FT that its enforcement division did not make formal requests for “companies to delist crypto assets”.
“In the course of an investigation, the staff may share its own view as to what conduct may raise questions for the commission under the securities laws,” FT said, citing the SEC.
In response to the FT report, a Coinbase spokesperson said the SEC had never shared a position that all assets other than bitcoin were securities, and that staff don’t make formal requests such as the one implied by the article without a vote of the full commission.
“We continue our discussions with the Commission, but believe that transparent and fair rulemaking and Congressional action represent the best path forward for American crypto users and the companies building the cryptoeconomy in the US,” the spokesperson added.
The regulator sued Binance in June, with both civil cases part of SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s push to assert jurisdiction over the crypto industry.
Gensler has labeled the crypto industry a “Wild West” that has undermined investor trust in the U.S. capital markets. Crypto companies say the SEC rules are unclear, and that the agency is overreaching by trying to regulate them.
The SEC did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on the report.
Source: Cryptocurrency - investing.com
