More stories

  • in

    AbbVie cuts 2024 profit forecast on R&D expenses

    The drugmaker has been focusing on expanding its pipeline since its blockbuster arthritis drug, Humira, lost patent protection last year. The company expects annual adjusted profit in the range of $10.61 to $10.81 per share, compared with its previous forecast of $11.13 to $11.33, a regulatory filing showed. Analysts were expecting $11.25 per share, according to LSEG data. AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV) also cut its second-quarter adjusted profit to $2.53 to $2.57 per share from $3.05 to $3.09. The company said it incurred $937 million in expenses during the quarter related to collaborations, licensing agreements and other asset acquisitions.The company is scheduled to report second-quarter results on July 25. More

  • in

    Hedge funds reach midyear with mishmash performance

    NEW YORK/LONDON (Reuters) – Hedge funds delivered a mixed first-half performance, with macro fund Caxton Associates struggling to maintain gains while a couple of multi-strategy and systematic funds went gangbusters, according to sources and public data.Andrew Law’s Caxton Associates, which places bets on macro economics, finished last month flat after a yearly performance to May-end that was up 4%, two sources familiar with the matter said.Not all macro strategies struggled. Bridgewater Associates’ flagship fund was up 14.4% this year through June 26, according to a source.The HFR Global Hedge Fund index capped the first half with a meager 2.89% gain. A first sample of hedge fund numbers obtained by Reuters shows there was some performance diversion in the industry during a period in which a tech boom lead global markets to a strong performance.”There was such a dispersion between returns that the benchmarks don’t always tell you exactly how a certain strategy is doing,” said Lilly Knight, K2 Advisors head of investment management. Some multi-strategy hedge funds were able to post double-digit returns in the first half of the year. Cinctive Capital was up 11%, as its bets around the impact of artificial intelligence on energy, utilities and technology paid off. Schonfeld Strategic Advisors’ flagship fund rose 10.3%, while the AQR Apex Strategy gained 13.5%. All of them beat giants Citadel and Millennium Management.Global fundamental long/short equities hedge funds posted gains of 7.55% in the first half, according to a Goldman Sachs prime brokerage note. Below the surface, the top performers posted almost 15% in gains, while the underperformers fell 2.22%On average, hedge funds struggled to keep pace with the MSCI’s 47-country world stock index, which rose roughly 11% in the first half. The S&P 500 soared 15% in the same period, mainly due to a handful of megacap stocks such as Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA).”There are hedge funds that own the megacap names that rallied in the first half of the year, but they’re not owned at anything close to market cap weight,” said Craig Bergstrom, chief investment officer of Corbin Capital.Philippe Laffont’s Coatue Management rose 9.2% in the first half, a source said. Aspect Capital’s Diversified fund, which trades systematically, returned 14.27% for the year to end June, said a source. The hedge fund, which currently oversees $9.1 billion of assets, made gains in agricultural markets, currencies and stocks.Kairos Partners’ senior portfolio manager Mario Unali said that going forward, hedge funds will face more challenges after a strong rally. “Markets are richer than a year ago and uncertainty is now higher,” he said.    Check below some hedge fund performances:Hedge fund Performance – H1 Schonfeld 10.3% Strategic Partners Schonfeld 11% Fundamenta l Equities Citadel 8.1% Wellington Citadel 13.7% Tactical Trading Citadel 9.9% Global Equities Citadel 2.2% Global Fixed Income Bridgewate 14.4%* r Pure Alpha Marshall 10.4% Wace Eureka Marshall 14.47% Wace Market Neutral TOPS Marshall 8.06% Wace Global Opportunit ies Winton 10.1% Multistrat egy Winton 9.5% Diversifie d Trend Trading Aspect 14.27% Capital’s Diversifie d Millennium 6.9% Management Coatue 9.2% Management Cinctive 11% Capital Caxton 0% Associates AQR Apex 13.5% Strategy *Through June 26 More

  • in

    Fed officials wanted ‘greater confidence’ that US inflation was cooling

    Standard DigitalWeekend Print + Standard Digitalwasnow $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital More

  • in

    Bitcoin Price Closes Crucial Gap: Bullish?

    However, amid the negative market sentiment, a notable event occurred. Today’s price drop allowed BTC to close a gap on the BTC price chart on the CME exchange from June 28. On that day, Bitcoin futures opened at $62,085 – 2.8% above the closing price of the previous day, leaving an unclosed gap on the BTC1 price chart.On financial and crypto markets, price gaps occur when an asset opens significantly higher or lower than its previous closing price, creating a gap on the chart. These gaps often act as magnets for future price movements, as traders anticipate the asset will eventually return to the gap level to “close” it. The significance of CME gaps for Bitcoin lies in their predictive power, as market participants closely watch these gaps for potential trading opportunities.The closing of a downward gap can be seen as a bullish signal for BTC. It indicates that the market has addressed an imbalance, potentially paving the way for a price rebound. While today’s market drop might seem negative at first glance, the closure of the CME gap could suggest a positive outlook for Bitcoin in the near future.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    Can the market fix climate change?

    Standard DigitalWeekend Print + Standard Digitalwasnow $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital More

  • in

    Kenya’s fraught choices

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.The outlook had appeared to be brightening for emerging markets that in recent years had teetered on the brink of debt crises. Several developing countries defied expectations by avoiding default and accessing international capital markets. Violent clashes between protesters and police last week in Kenya, however, show the tensions below the surface. Kenyans took to the streets to oppose a sweeping tax rise put forward by President William Ruto. They argued that the proposal, designed to meet fiscal targets required for an IMF loan, would cause undue harm to struggling citizens through steep increases on everyday products including bread and sanitary pads. Public dissent was met by force, including the use of live ammunition. After days of unrest and 39 deaths, Ruto’s administration withdrew the bill.This was, in truth, a poorly designed tax policy. Substantial tax rises on essentials are ill-advised in an economy with an official poverty rate of 38.6 per cent. Rolling out the wave of new levies simultaneously shows a lack of political acumen, and a disregard for the plight of impoverished Kenyans. The unrest also reflected a deeper rot. Profligate borrowing and poor economic management have taken Kenya’s debt above 70 per cent of output. Debt service costs have risen to 32 per cent of annual government revenues — money that would be better spent on climate resiliency and public services. Ruto’s government struggled to meet a $2bn payment on a maturing 2014 Eurobond. In another era, the choice might have been to default and pursue debt relief. Having seen the costly restructuring processes for Zambia and Ghana, Ruto’s team took another path. They used IMF funds and issued $1.5bn in new debt at the high price of 10.375 per cent to pay back the bond.Kenya’s success in tapping the capital market appeared to many a sign of economic strength. Yet, that Ruto had to trade a 6.875 per cent Eurobond for the higher coupon to avoid default — in essence delaying the payment and passing a higher cost on to Kenyans via tax rises — is a symbol of how dysfunctional the global debt architecture has become.The G20’s 2020 Common Framework for Debt Treatment has been unable to corral the competing interests of bilateral and private creditors, plus China. The result is lengthy, expensive restructurings that damage economies and stymie development. Ruto, balancing a large number of private creditors and a big Chinese loan due in 2025, is understandably trying to avoid that fate. Internal improvements at the IMF have reduced delays. But more needs to be done. Lawmakers in New York, where nearly half of all EM bonds are governed, proposed legislation that would penalise uncooperative private creditors and encourage comparable treatment between them and sovereign lenders. Since the latter had been a sticking point for China, this could both speed up the process and help to bring Beijing to the negotiating table.The IMF should recognise that a flawed system requires more adept fiscal recommendations, potentially including guidance on ways to plug fiscal gaps beyond tax rises. It could also go further by advising countries on when to reprofile debts, instead of refinancing them at higher rates.As for Kenya, the road ahead is unclear. Better fiscal management is desperately needed. Yet the options are limited. Ruto’s decision to favour government cost reductions over a tax rise is sensible, but it will not be enough to plug the financial gap. He may need to borrow more — further limiting his room for manoeuvre between creditors and an angry populace. More

  • in

    Germany vetoes sale of sensitive turbine unit to Chinese group

    Standard DigitalWeekend Print + Standard Digitalwasnow $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital More

  • in

    Ethereum Skyrockets 100% Against Bitcoin in Annual Revenue

    Other networks also contributed to the overall fee income landscape. Solana generated $241.3 million, Binance’s chain accumulated $176.6 million and Avalanche recorded $68.83 million. Additionally, the zkSync Era earned nearly $60 million, Optimism $40.4 million and Polygon $23.9 million.As the data highlights, Ethereum has a significant lead, doubling Bitcoin’s revenue. This result is attributed to a broader range of applications and services on the network of the main altocin, with higher usage and transaction fees as a result.In return, Bitcoin’s revenue, while still over a billion dollars, is primarily driven by its role as a digital store of value and medium of exchange. Its transaction fees are affected by network congestion and the price of BTC itself, which can fluctuate significantly. However, it still lacks the extensive range of applications found in the Ethereum ecosystem, resulting in lower overall fee income.This article was originally published on U.Today More