More stories

  • in

    Tesla, Ford take top spots as most shorted stocks in 2023 – Hazeltree

    LONDON (Reuters) – Hedge funds took the most bets against auto companies Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), Ford (NYSE:F), and communications company Charter Communications (NASDAQ:CHTR) in 2023, a report by data firm Hazeltree said on Thursday. A short bet expects a company’s stock price to decline. These three firms, the most shorted U.S. large cap stocks, also featured in the top three spots in 2022, though the number of funds betting against Tesla and Ford was lower last year, Hazeltree said.In terms of industry sectors, tech firms attracted the most short positions in the United States, while consumer products and healthcare companies were the most shorted mid and small-cap stocks, respectively. More

  • in

    Ethereum (ETH) Soars to $2,400, Institutional FOMO Yet to Kick In – What’s Next?

    However, what is intriguing is that institutional fear of missing out (FOMO) has yet to kick in, as noted by prominent market observers. Greeks.live, a cryptocurrency analytics platform, took to X (formerly Twitter) to share insights on Ethereum’s recent performance. According to their tweet, the surge in ETH has not only propelled it to breach the $2,400 barrier but has also resulted in all major term IVs soaring to yearly highs.Additionally, the daily volume (DVOL) spiked to 70%, reaching a level not seen since April. Analyzing options data, the tweet pointed out that the skew, a measure of the perceived distribution of potential price outcomes, has not followed the rally. This suggests that institutional traders are yet to fully embrace the FOMO associated with ETH’s bullish run.As of the latest available data, Ethereum is currently priced at $2,380, reflecting a notable 6.49% increase in the last 24 hours. Over the past 30 days, ETH has experienced an impressive surge of 18.88%. The trading volume of Ethereum has also witnessed a substantial uptick, rising by 84.35% in the last 24 hours and currently standing at $17.9 billion.Despite the impressive gains, the subdued response from institutional traders has left the market speculating about the potential catalysts that could trigger their entry into the FOMO-driven rally. Whether this is a brief pause before a larger institutional influx or a sign of cautious optimism remains to be seen. The cryptocurrency market, known for its unpredictability, continues to be a source of both excitement and speculation as the year draws to a close.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    Ethereum (ETH) Layer 2 Networks Growth Is Crucial: Here’s Why

    The main network layer of Ethereum has faced significant challenges in scaling to meet the demands of its growing user base and application field. High gas fees and network congestion have highlighted the limitations of the current infrastructure, making the need for efficient L2 solutions more pressing than ever. These L2 networks are designed to offload the burden from the Ethereum mainnet, offering faster transactions and lower fees, making them an attractive alternative for developers.ETH/USD chart by TradingViewThis shift toward L2 networks does not just represent a stop-gap solution but is becoming integral to Ethereum’s future. It is reasonable to expect that the initial signs of a rally within the Ethereum ecosystem will emerge on these scalable platforms. They are set to be the breeding ground for innovation and the go-to space for new projects in DeFi, NFTs and beyond.The new Ethereum road map, as outlined by Vitalik Buterin, underscores this transition. Key updates to the road map include the solidification of single slot finality (SSF) in post-Merge proof of stake (PoS) improvements, which aims to enhance the efficiency and security of the network. Buterin has also highlighted the importance of cross-rollup standards and interoperability as areas requiring long-term development. These would enable seamless communication and transaction execution across different L2 solutions, furthering the composability of the ecosystem.Further developments such as the redesign of The Scourge, the nearing readiness of Verkle trees for inclusion, and the shrinking of “state expiry” to reflect a broader consensus show a commitment to continuous improvement. Additions like deep cryptography, including obfuscation and delay-encrypted mempools, suggest a forward-looking approach to security and privacy within the network.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    World economy — the story remains one of integration

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.What are the prospects for the world’s still highly integrated economy? In answering this question, one has to start with the underlying forces at work.The most fundamental are changes in economic opportunities. These include reductions in costs of transport and communications, shifts in comparative advantage and changing opportunities for exploiting economies of scale and learning by doing. No less crucial, particularly in the short and medium run, are changes in economic ideas and geopolitical realities. Finally, shocks — wars, crises and pandemics — also shift the perceptions of business, peoples and politicians of the risks, costs and benefits of cross-border integration.The history of cross-border integration, especially trade, illuminates the interplay among these forces.The long-term story is one of growing integration. Between 1840 and 2022, the ratio of world trade in goods to global output rose roughly fourfold. Yet openness to trade has fluctuated dramatically: the ratio of trade in goods to world output tripled between 1840 and 1913, then fell by roughly two-thirds between 1913 and 1945, and tripled again between 1945 and 1990, to surpass pre-1914 levels.You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.After the collapse of the Soviet Union and empire in the early 1990s, the world economy experienced two eras. The first, up to about 2010, was one of “hyperglobalisation”, a label applied by Arvind Subramanian and Martin Kessler in a 2013 paper for the Peterson Institute of International Economics.The dominant features were rapid growth of international transactions relative to global output, with flows of direct and portfolio capital across borders growing even faster than trade in goods and services. By the financial crisis of 2007-09, the world economy had become more integrated than ever.Thereafter, the world economy entered an era some label “slowbalisation”. Subramaniam and Kessler (with Emanuele Properzi) have analysed this in a Peterson Institute piece of November 2023. In this period, trade has grown roughly in line with world output, while ratios of cross-border investment to world output have more than halved.What caused pre-crisis hyperglobalisation? Why did it end in slowbalisation? What might happen next? The answer to the first question is that, after 1990, all three driving forces came together. First, close to one and a half centuries of divergent economic growth had created huge gaps in productivity between the most advanced economies and those that had fallen behind, notably China. This created enormous opportunities for taking advantage of cheap labour.Second, the container ship, jumbo jet and advances in information and communication technology allowed unprecedented cross-border integration of business organisations and unbundling of supply chains. Finally, the worldwide shift towards belief in market liberalisation and cross-border opening transformed policy. Among the transformative moments were the arrival of Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Deng Xiaoping to power in the UK, US and China, respectively. In world trade, highlights included completion of the Uruguay Round of multilateral negotiations in 1993, establishment of the EU single market in 1993, creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995 and China’s accession to the WTO in 2001.You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.What ended this period? All the main drivers weakened or went into reverse. The opportunity for further trade increases through exploitation of differences in labour costs diminished, as those costs converged. As China’s economy grew, its dependence on trade naturally declined. Shocks caused by the pandemic and wars also underlined the risks associated with extensive reliance on trade for essential supplies.At least as important have been ideological changes, among them the rise in protectionism and nationalism, notably in the US, triggered by the economic rise of China and the “China shock” to industrial employment. Parallel changes have occurred in Xi Jinping’s China. There, too, policy has shifted from reliance on the free market and private business towards greater government control.Perhaps most important, the global financial crisis, pandemic and today’s great power tensions have transformed trust into suspicion and risk-taking into “de-risking”. No substantial global trade liberalisation has occurred in more than two decades.What could come next? Continuation of a messy status quo seems the most plausible answer. The world economy would remain relatively open by historical standards with trade growing more or less in line with world output. Some decoupling of direct links between the US and China would occur. But the attempted shift by the US (and others) towards other suppliers would leave indirect dependence on inputs imported from China. A large number of countries would continue to maintain trade with the US and its close allies, on the one hand, and China, on the other.The most likely alternative to this would be a more radical breakdown. Attempts to limit US actions against China over national security — Jake Sullivan’s “small yard and high fence” — might end up with a big yard and a high fence; Donald Trump winning the presidency might be the catalyst. Conflicts over the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism could be another trigger for global protectionism.The integrated world economy is surviving. But great power nationalist rivalry can cause huge disruption. Will this era prove to be an exception? We must work to ensure it does. More

  • in

    Bank of America voices concerns over CFPB proposed overdraft cap

    This move comes as part of a White House initiative to assist Americans living paycheck to paycheck by easing an unnecessary financial burden. The banking industry has already seen a trend toward reducing these charges, with major players such as Bank of America leading the way. This trend contributed to a decrease in fee income for the industry, which fell to $9B in 2022.The proposal has garnered mixed reactions. While President Biden has endorsed the initiative, highlighting the importance of eliminating fees that disproportionately impact lower-income families, the American Bankers Association has voiced concerns. They argue that consumers appreciate the existing overdraft facilities.Major banks are poised for a regulatory clash over the proposal’s final version and its economic consequences. The CFPB’s proposal is part of a larger conversation about the fairness and structure of bank fees and the financial system’s responsibility to consumers. As the proposal moves forward today, it is expected to undergo further scrutiny and debate.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More

  • in

    China widens South America trade highway with Silk Road mega port

    CHANCAY, Peru (Reuters) – In September, a group of Brazilian farmers and officials arrived in the Peruvian fishing town of Chancay. The draw: a new Chinese mega port rising on the Pacific coast, promising to turbo charge South America’s trade ties with China.The $3.5 billion deep water port, set to start operations late this year, will provide China with a direct gateway to the resource-rich region. Over the last ten years, Beijing has unseated the United States as the largest trade partner for South America, devouring its soy, corn and copper.The port, majority-owned by Chinese state-owned firm Cosco Shipping, will be the first controlled by China in South America. It will able to accommodate the largest cargo ships, which can head directly to Asia, cutting the journey time by two weeks for some exporters.Beijing and Lima hope Chancay will become a regional hub, both for copper exports from the Andean nation as well as soy from western Brazil, which currently travels through the Panama Canal or skirts the Atlantic before steaming to China.”The Chancay mega port aims to turn Peru into a strategic commercial and port hub between South America and Asia,” Peru’s trade minister Juan Mathews Salazar told Reuters.Part of China’s decade-old ‘Belt and Road’ drive, the new port embodies the challenge facing the United States and Europe as they look to counter Beijing’s rising influence in Latin America. China’s trade muscle has helped it win allies and gain leverage in political forums, finance and technology.Full construction started in 2018 at Chancay, some 80 kilometers (50 miles) north of Lima. Workers are now laying thousands of piles and breakwaters; work signs are written in white-on-red Chinese characters.The first phase of Chancay is set be completed in November 2024. Chinese President Xi Jinping, expected in Peru for an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit that month, could inaugurate the port, a diplomatic source in Lima said.China’s embassy in Lima did not respond to Reuters queries. “It’s part of China’s new Silk Road,” said Mario de las Casas, corporate affairs manager for Cosco Shipping, which holds a 60% stake in the port. The remainder is controlled by local miner Volcan, in which Glencore (OTC:GLNCY) owns a stake.Jose Adriano da Silva, a farming entrepreneur from Brazil’s western Acre state who visited the port, said the project would accelerate regional development. He said talks between Peruvian and Brazilian officials were underway to resolve overland transport challenges.Peru’s government is planning an exclusive economic zone near the port and Cosco wants to build an industrial hub near Chancay to process raw materials that could include grains and meat from Brazil before shipping them to Asia.Brazil’s ambassador in Peru, Clemente Baena Soares, said there were plans for meetings between officials early this year to seek to resolve logistical, sanitary and bureaucratic hurdles at the border so Brazilian trucks can more easily reach the port.”It’s an opportunity for grain and meat production – especially from Rondonia, Acre, Mato Grosso and Amazonas – to go to Asia through the port of Chancay,” said Soares, who also visited Chancay in September, naming four states in western Brazil.”(Brazilian businesses) are delighted with the possibility of not using the Panama Canal to take their goods to Asia.”He added there would need to be investment in an existing road known as the Interoceanic Highway – which runs from further south in Peru across the Andes to Brazil – to improve transport routes. A long-discussed rail link remained in the study phase, he said. STARK TRANSFORMATIONChina overtook the United States on trade in South and Central America under former President Donald Trump, despite his administration warning the region about the dangers of getting too close to Beijing. Under President Joe Biden the gap has widened despite attempts to reverse it.U.S. officials are now taking a different tack, arguing that the United States offers the region other things beyond trade, including investment in high-tech industries.”I think using the metric of trade to evaluate the influence of China is not an accurate way,” Juan Gonzalez, a White House adviser and the National Security Council’s Western Hemisphere senior director, told Reuters in Buenos Aires.”We’re confident in our ability to compete with China,” he added, urging regional governments to ensure there were no “political strings attached” to trade with Beijing.Beijing says its trade and investment in Latin America is a win-win for both sides. Some 150 countries have signed on to the Belt and Road with China, including 22 in Latin America.The change over ten years is stark.A decade ago, Peru, the world’s no. 2 copper producer, traded slightly more with the United States than China. Now, China has a more than $10 billion lead in bilateral trade, the latest annual data show.That trend is playing out around the region.Reuters interviewed two dozen officials, business leaders and trade experts, along with an analysis of ten years of trade data, revealing how China’s infrastructure spending is cementing its role as the key trade and investment partner for South America, defying an economic slowdown at home and U.S. warnings about debt trap diplomacy.Part of the shift is pragmatic. Fast-growing China needs the copper and lithium from South America’s Andes, along with the corn and soy from the plains of Argentina and Brazil.But its widening trade lead – some $100 billion around South America in the most recent annual data – brings extra clout.Beijing has in the last year upgraded ties with Uruguay and Colombia to “strategic partnerships” – the latter a U.S. ally.Argentina’s President Javier Milei, once highly critical of China, has softened his stance since taking office last month, reflecting Beijing’s importance to the crisis-hit economy.It is the top buyer of Argentina’s soy and beef and has an $18 billion currency swap line with the country – which Argentina’s cash-strapped government has tapped to pay its debt, including with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).”The last thing our dear Argentine friends need in these challenging times is to lose the support of an important partner like China,” the Chinese ambassador in Colombia wrote on social media platform X following Milei’s inauguration.’POINT OF LEVERAGE’Peru’s trade with China doubled in the last decade to $33 billion in 2022, driven by rising copper exports, even as its commerce flatlined with the United States. China has invested some $24 billion in Peruvian mines, the power grid, transportation and hydro-electric power generation over the same period.Exports to China grew 9.3% in the first eleven months of last year, government data show, faster than the 5.3% growth of exports to the United States. Peru has a $9.4 billion trade surplus with China and a $1.3 billion deficit the United States.Peru’s President Dina Boluarte met China’s Xi in November at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum in San Francisco. They discussed the Chancay port, which Boluarte said was a “significant boost to free trade and new Chinese investments.”That came after an awkward on-the-move parlay in Washington with Biden, which was not given full bilateral meeting status.”China is taking advantage of our absence and that’s a real problem,” said Eric Farnsworth, a former White House adviser and State Department official, who is now a Latin America expert at the Council of the Americas and Americas Society.He said the port bolstered China’s powerful position in Peru and created a “point of leverage” in the region.Two regional diplomats said it also reflected a more muscular and ambitious China, often backed by deep pockets: a far cry from a wave of Chinese immigration to Peru two centuries ago when migrants came as cotton workers or to set up ‘chifas’ – Chinese food outlets.”Now business executives or bankers come, with big projects tucked under their belts,” said Juan Carlos Capuñay, Peru’s former ambassador to China.’NEW BATTLE GROUND FOR MINERALS’ China hasn’t had things all its own way. Its Belt and Road has faced pushback in Asia and Europe – Italy recently pulled out of the initiative – while bad debts owed to China have ballooned. In Latin America, projects from Argentina to Venezuela have faced hold-ups.Diplomats and trade experts also cautioned that the Chancay port would only be successful if regional infrastructure including roads and railways improved to enable goods to get there, including grains from Brazil.Currently, the Interocean Highway – a little-used road corridor of some 2,600 kilometers (1,616 miles) in five sections, built more than a decade ago – links the Pacific Coast in the south of Peru to Brazil’s state of Acre.”The issue today is a lack of regional connections, which is very complex for the success of the project,” said Fernando Reyes Matta, former Chilean ambassador to China.Nonetheless, several of the people said China’s rise in South America was solidifying despite these headwinds, with the region desperate for financing and foreign currency.A senior European diplomat based in South America said the big gap in infrastructure funding in the region made it hard for the United States to “strong arm” local governments to turn down Chinese money. Meanwhile, global interest had grown in South America’s resources such as lithium, copper and grains.”Latin America has become a new battle ground for those minerals between the United States, Europe and China,” he said. More

  • in

    Telangana attracts Rs 36,670 crore in investment proposals at Davos

    The Group’s renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy (AGEL), is set to invest in two pumped storage projects at Koyabestagudem (850 MW) and Nacharam (500 MW). These projects are part of a larger green energy initiative that the Group is undertaking as the world transitions towards more sustainable energy solutions. AGEL has also unveiled plans for a renewable energy-backed data center project, investing Rs 5,000 crore ($666M). This initiative is expected to create approximately 600 jobs through partnerships with local MSMEs/startups.In addition to these investments, AdaniConneX, another subsidiary of the Adani Group, will be establishing a data center project, further underlining the Group’s commitment to the tech sector.The Adani Group’s investment spree in Telangana also extends to the defense sector. Adani Defence Systems has committed Rs 1,000 crores ($133M) to establish an ecosystem at Aerospace Park focused on counter-drone and missile system development. This move signifies the Group’s diversification and interest in contributing to the strategic sectors of the Indian economy while providing jobs for over 1,000 people.Moreover, Ambuja Cements plans to inject Rs 1,400 crore ($186M) into a new cement grinding unit. This unit, which will have a capacity of 6 million tonnes per annum (MTPA), is expected to support the growing infrastructure needs of the region and employ over 4,000 individuals.Today’s updates clarify that Telangana secured investments from the Adani Group totaling Rs 12,400 crore ($1.6B) across four sectors to promote sustainable economic development. The investments are split with Rs 5,000 crore going towards a renewable energy-backed data center project, another Rs 5,000 crore for two pumped storage projects, Rs 1,000 crore for the establishment of counter-drone and missile system facilities at Adani Aerospace Park, and Rs 1,400 crore from Ambuja Cements for a new cement plant. These investments are expected to generate significant job opportunities and bolster the local economy.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More