More stories

  • in

    ‘Saylor Wants More Bitcoin Than Satoshi’: XRP Lawyer Reacts to MicroStrategy’s BTC Purchase

    The focal point of this significant acquisition is Saylor’s ambitious goal, as outlined by renowned Bitcoin evangelist Max Keiser. According to Keiser, who also serves as an advisor to the president of El Salvador, the company’s use of a collateral seesaw strategy between stock and debt issuance, coupled with strategic purchases, positions the company to potentially own 5% of all Bitcoin in existence. This would equate to a monumental 1.05 million BTC., a prominent lawyer, crypto enthusiast, and legal representative of XRP holders, weighed in on Saylor’s ambitious pursuit. Deaton expressed that MicroStrategy’s commitment to amassing more Bitcoin than Satoshi is evident. As an owner of both MicroStrategy stocks and BTC, the lawyer highlighted the confidence he has in Saylor’s strategy, noting that, as a shareholder, he has no complaints despite differing opinions on the “reckless” approach.Notably, MicroStrategy’s average purchase price stands at $31,168, leading to a remarkable profit of over $2.25 billion at today’s prices.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    Central banks rethink forecasting after failures on inflation

    Central bankers are rethinking their approach to economic forecasting after their high-profile failures to spot the most recent inflationary outburst, as officials argue for greater candour with the markets about the uncertainties they are confronting. The European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and other official forecasters failed to see how the end of Covid-19 lockdowns and an energy shock triggered by Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine could pave the way for the worst inflationary spiral in a generation.   After responding with aggressive rate rises, central banks have engaged in intensive postmortems as they unpack the reasons for their failure. Christine Lagarde, the ECB’s president, told the Financial Times in a recent interview that the central bank needs to learn from its mistakes. “What we should have learned is that we cannot just rely only on textbook cases and pure models. We have to think with a broader horizon,” she said. You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.One outcome, officials say, is an increased focus on alternative “scenarios” for future economic developments, to illustrate how policy might react. Huw Pill, the BoE’s chief economist, has told the Financial Times this might be a better way of communicating to the markets than via the BoE’s traditional “fan chart” forecast, which communicates uncertainty by ranges of probabilities. Sarah Breeden, a BoE deputy governor, said in a December 19 speech that looking at differing scenarios is a “helpful policy tool against a backdrop of unprecedented shocks”.For its part, the ECB now models different scenarios for inflation and produces a range of sensitivity analyses, such as examining what would happen if wages rose faster or slower than expected or if another energy supply shock struck. The problem is that so far its early attempts have had mixed results. Even the most “severe scenario” it published in March 2022, modelling the impact of big cuts in Russian gas supplies to Europe, underestimated how high eurozone inflation would rise. It predicted inflation would average 7.1 per cent in 2022 and 2.7 per cent in 2023. Last year, prices in the bloc rose 8.4 per cent and this year they are expected to jump 5.4 per cent.The BoE’s court of directors has commissioned a review from Ben Bernanke, former chair of the Fed, to examine the BoE’s forecasting and communications. Officials think a greater use of scenario analysis will be among the options examined under the review, due to report in 2024. Charles Goodhart, a former BoE policymaker, said that, while central banks focusing more on scenario analysis than a central forecast would be desirable, they should produce an even number of scenarios. If they were to produce an odd number, markets would immediately fixate on the ‘central’ outlook, even if it should not be seen as carrying the central bank’s endorsement, he argued. The lessons on forecasting go well beyond this topic. In Frankfurt, ECB staff are paying more attention to how fast changes in wholesale prices pass into household gas and electricity bills, which differs from country to country. They focus more on refining margins when forecasting energy prices and no longer assume gas and oil prices will move in parallel, after they diverged massively last year. An analysis published earlier this year by the ECB found wrong assumptions on energy prices accounted for three-quarters of its overall inflation forecasting errors in 2021, when its prediction for the first quarter of 2022 turned out to be 2 percentage points too low.In another change, the ECB closely tracks hundreds of shifts in fiscal policy — such as the many government subsidies on energy and food — to get a better grip on their growing influence on inflation. In addition, its staff use a wage tracker they have developed and the results of consumer and business surveys to adjust the output of their models.From left: ECB president Christine Lagarde, BoE governor Andrew Bailey and Fed chair Jay Powell are rethinking how their central banks forecast inflation More

  • in

    Japan Nov factory output falls 0.9% month/month

    Manufacturers surveyed by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry expect seasonally adjusted output to increase 6.0% in December and decline 7.2% in January.Other data showed Japanese retail sales expanded 5.3% in November from a year earlier. That was roughly in line with the median market forecast for a 5.0% gain and marked the 21st consecutive month of expansion since March 2022.Compared with the previous month, retail sales grew 1.0% in November, following a 1.7% decline in October, the data showed. More

  • in

    Explainer-What is next after pause of US Apple Watch import ban?

    (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday temporarily paused a ruling that had restricted imports of Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)’s popular Apple Watches into the United States.Here is a look at what the case means for consumers and what is next for Apple.Why was the ban imposed?The U.S. International Trade Commission in October ordered Apple to stop importing and selling some Apple Watches following a complaint from medical-monitoring technology company Masimo (NASDAQ:MASI). The ITC, a federal agency that handles international trade disputes, found that an Apple Watch feature for reading blood-oxygen levels infringed on Masimo’s pulse oximetry patents.President Joe Biden’s administration had until Dec. 25 to veto the order based on public policy concerns but did not do so. Cupertino, California-based Apple had preemptively paused U.S. sales of its latest high-end Series 9 and Ultra 2 models ahead of the Christmas Day deadline. Apple appealed the ban to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington. The court halted the ban on Wednesday while it considers the company’s request for a longer-term pause during the appeals process.How are U.S. Apple Watch sales affected?Wednesday’s decision allows Apple to continue importing and selling infringing Apple Watches while the court considers whether to put the ban on hold for the duration of the appeals process.Apple said in a statement that Series 9 and Ultra 2 watches would be back on sale in Apple Stores starting on Wednesday and through Apple’s website on Thursday.The ITC’s order does not affect the lower-priced Apple Watch SE, which does not have pulse-oximetry capabilities.The ITC decision says it applies only to Apple Watches with the light-based pulse oximetry capability in question, but does not specify which models with that technology are affected. Apple first introduced pulse oximetry in its Series 6 watches, and Masimo has argued that all Apple Watches with the technology infringe its patents.Apple said it would also stop replacing out-of-warranty watches going back to Series 6 based on the ban. The ban specifically applies to Apple and its “affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities,” and may not affect other retailers. Series 9 and Ultra 2 Apple Watches were still available during the ban from third-party sellers including Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Best Buy (NYSE:BBY) and Walmart (NYSE:WMT). What are the accusations against Apple?Masimo, which released a watch last year that also reads blood-oxygen levels and tracks other health indicators, accused Apple of hiring away its employees and stealing its technology after discussing a potential collaboration. A jury trial on Masimo’s allegations in California federal court ended with a mistrial in May and has yet to be rescheduled.Apple has called Irvine, California-based Masimo’s legal actions a scheme to clear a path for its competing smartwatch, and has countersued Masimo for patent infringement in Delaware federal court.What are Apple’s other options?In addition to its appeal, Apple is working on a redesign that would enable its watches to operate without infringing on Masimo’s patents. It could import and sell the redesigned watches regardless of the ITC’s ban if U.S. Customs and Border Protection approves the workaround.Apple told the Federal Circuit on Tuesday that the customs agency is scheduled to make its decision on the workaround on Jan. 12.Masimo has said that its patents cover hardware, and that a software fix would not work.Masimo CEO Joe Kiani has also indicated that he is willing to settle the dispute. More

  • in

    US to provide up to $250 million in arms, equipment to Ukraine -Blinken

    President Joe Biden has asked Congress to provide another $61 billion in aid to Ukraine, but Republicans are refusing to approve the assistance without an agreement with Democrats to tighten security along the U.S.-Mexico border.The White House has warned that without the additional appropriation U.S. aid will run out by the end of the year for Ukraine’s fight to retake territory occupied by Russian forces since it invaded in February 2022.Blinken said the latest aid package included air defense munitions, additional ammunition for high-mobility artillery rocket systems, artillery ammunition, anti-armor munitions and over 15 million rounds of ammunition.Congress has approved more than $110 billion for Ukraine since Russia’s invasion, but it has not approved any funds since Republicans took control of the House of Representatives from Democrats in January 2023. More

  • in

    US short-term financing rate spikes as dealers close books for 2023

    NEW YORK (Reuters) – A measure of the cost of borrowing short-term funds backed by U.S. Treasuries spiked this week to its highest since 2019, a move some market participants attributed to dealers closing their balance sheets for the year.The DTCC GCF Treasury Repo Index, which tracks the average daily interest rate paid for the most-traded General Collateral Finance (GFC) Repo contracts for U.S. Treasuries, jumped to 5.452% on Tuesday from 5.395% last week. That is the highest level since September 2019, when dwindling bank reserves sent the cost of overnight loans as high as 10%, forcing the Federal Reserve to intervene.The spike resulted from dealers closing their books for the year, which meant borrowers had to pay more to fund their collateral, several market participants said.”It looks like there was a need for cash which drove up the overnight fund rates,” said Tom di Galoma, managing director and co-head of global rates trading at BTIG. “There is a lot volatility in overnight rates due to year-end.”A spike in the price for repurchase agreements, or repos, in which investors borrow against Treasury and other collateral, can be a sign that cash is getting scarce in a key funding market for Wall Street. A three-day jump in the Treasury GCF Repo Index from Nov. 30 to Dec. 4 raised concerns on whether cash levels were sufficiently healthy.This week’s GFC repo price increase is not worrying, said Steven Zeng, U.S. rates strategist at Deutsche Bank. “The GCF market is dealer to dealer lending, so a much more limited amount of cash (is) being moved around, resulting in higher rates.”Because large dealer banks are offering less intermediation at year-end, cash in money market funds could not make its way to hedge funds and other cash borrowers. Increased usage of the Fed’s reverse repo facility, through which money market funds lend to the Fed, was evidence of money market funds wanting to invest cash but lacking private counterparties, Zeng said.Cash flowing into the Fed’s reverse repo (RRP) facility jumped to $793.9 billion on Dec. 26 from $772.3 billion as of the end of last week.”It’s year-end coming and bank balance sheets and window-dressing are preventing the money market funds from taking cash to banks,” said Scott Skyrm, executive vice president of Curvature Securities. “If it wasn’t year end … a lot more of that RRP cash would be flowing into the repo market.” More