More stories

  • in

    Bitcoin surge triggers altcoins rally, leads to $124 million in liquidations

    The majority of these liquidations were borne by short-position investors who absorbed losses amounting to $13.65 million. The breakdown of the liquidations includes Bitcoin ($5.82 million), Ethereum ($2.34 million), Solana ($1.63 million), and XRP ($920,000). Adding to the market turbulence, ORDI, a newly listed cryptocurrency on Binance, experienced an unexpected liquidation of $590,000. Over the past 24 hours, total assets liquidated reached a staggering sum of $124 million. Long positions constituted $79 million while short positions accounted for $45 million. The cryptocurrencies most impacted by these liquidations were Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP, and Solana. This swift market movement underscores the inherent risk and volatility associated with cryptocurrency investments.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More

  • in

    Western businesses flock back to Shanghai trade fair despite tensions

    Standing just metres from a stand promoting American soyabeans exports, Nicholas Burns, US ambassador to China, was eager to emphasise his country’s contribution to one of the world’s biggest trade fairs.“We have the largest number of businesses and exhibitors this year — that’s more than any other country,” Burns told an enthusiastic scrum of reporters at the China International Import Expo in Shanghai this week.The US delegation, he added, was there “to show our commitment to the overall relationship between the United States and China”.The crowded scene contrasted sharply with last year’s sparsely attended event, which took place during the final full month of China’s three-year zero-Covid policy. It also hinted at the prospect of increased Chinese collaboration with US and other foreign companies, despite geopolitical tensions and a weaker-than-hoped post-pandemic recovery.For thousands of global businesses that have felt the chill of those tensions, the Shanghai expo was an opportunity to reiterate their commitment to a market that continues to grow.“Right now we are only targeting ‘tier one’ cities because they have higher consumption,” said Nie Dan, a marketing representative of Irish-US group Dole Food. “But our plan next is to expand to lower tier cities.”This year’s CIIE, an annual event launched in 2018 by Chinese president Xi Jinping, included more than half of the world’s Fortune 500 companies and more than 3,000 businesses in total, each with stalls and exhibits across a vast concrete structure on the outskirts of China’s biggest city.At a time when companies are weighing up their comments on China carefully, pre-arranged interviews with business leaders played on screens in the expo media centre. Jerry Zhang, chief executive of Standard Chartered China, said her bank was “linking China with the global market”, while Titus von dem Bongart of EY hailed CIIE as a major event for foreign businesses.Smaller companies, many with stalls crowded with Chinese business people, were also keen to take advantage of post-pandemic opening. “In Shanghai it’s our first time because before it was Covid,” said Alexandre Ebralidze, who was representing a Georgian wine business. “It’s a huge market,” he added. “We are trying to develop step by step.”Pickering, an electronics group headquartered in the English town of Clacton-on-Sea, also attended for the first time. “I wasn’t really too sure how many individuals would be interested to come and talk to us,” said head of marketing Joe Woodford, adding the footfall exceeded his expectations, with hundreds of visitors to the stand.Woodford said the group stood to benefit from rapid industrial evolution in the country. “As China accelerates its manufacturing and its manufacturing costs go up, they’re obviously going to have to do more automation, and that gives us as a company an opportunity to grow into that sector.”This year’s expo suggested the trend towards greater localisation of overseas companies in China was continuing More

  • in

    A Trump win would change the world

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.On November 19 1919, the US Senate repudiated the Versailles Treaty. With that decision, the US withdrew its might from maintaining what had been agreed in the aftermath of the first world war, leaving this task to the British and French, who lacked both the will and the means to do so. The second world war followed. After that conflict, the US played a far more productive role. Today, the world is still in many ways the one the US made. But for how much longer will that be the case? And what might follow it? The outcome of the next presidential election might answer these questions, not just decisively, but, alas, very badly.Recent polls suggest that almost 55 per cent of US voters disapprove of Joe Biden’s performance. They also suggest that Trump is slightly ahead of Biden in head-to-head polling before the election now a year away. Finally, they suggest that Trump is ahead of Biden in five of the six most important “battleground” states. In all, a Trump victory is clearly and disturbingly plausible. (See charts.)What would that mean? The most important answer is that the US, not just the world’s most powerful democracy, but its saviour in the 20th century, is no longer committed to democratic norms. The most fundamental of such norms is that power has to be won in free and fair elections. Whether US presidential elections are “fair” is debatable. But they do have rules. Efforts by the incumbent to overthrow those rules amount to insurrection. That Trump attempted to do so is not debatable. Neither is the absence of evidence of fraud to support his attempted coup. He is properly under indictment. Yet he might still win a presidential election. One reason why he might do so is that close to 70 per cent of people who identify as Republicans say they believe his lies. This is shocking, though, alas, not that surprising.You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.What would another Trump presidency mean for the US, beyond an endorsement of a man who attempted to overthrow the constitution? Obviously, the answer would depend partly on the balance in Congress. Yet it would be wrong to draw additional comfort from how he behaved last time. Then he relied on quite traditional figures from the military and business. Next time will be different. “Maga” is now a cult with a sizeable number of believers.A crucial domestic plan of Trump’s is to replace the career civil service with loyal servants of the president. The excuse is the alleged existence of a “deep state”, by which critics mean knowledgeable career civil servants whose loyalty is to the law and the state, not to the person in power. One reason this is objectionable is that modern government cannot run without such people. The bigger reason is that if the intelligence, homeland security and internal revenue services, the military, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice are subservient to the whims of the head of state, one has autocracy. Yes, it’s that simple. With a vengeful head of state, abuses of power could be pervasive. This would not be the US we have known. It might be more like Viktor Orbán’s Hungary or even Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s Turkey.What might this mean for the world?Most obviously, embrace by the US of a man and a party that have openly repudiated the central norm of liberal democracy would dishearten those who believe in it and encourage despots and their lackeys everywhere. It is hard to exaggerate the effect of such a betrayal by the US.The mixture of this despair with Trump’s avowedly transactional approach would weaken, if not destroy, the trust on which current US alliances are based. Americans are right to decry the freeriding of most allies. There is no doubt, above all, that Europeans (among which the UK is included) must do more. But the alliance needs a leader. For the foreseeable future, the US has to be that leader. With Russia threatening Europe, and China a peer competitor, alliances are going to be more important than ever — not just for its allies, but for the US, too. Trump neither understands nor cares about this.Then there are the implications for the world economy. Trump is proposing to introduce a 10 per cent across-the-board tariff on all imports. This would be a contemporary (albeit milder) version of the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930. It would surely lead to retaliation. It would also do huge damage to the World Trade Organization, by repudiating US commitments to lower tariff barriers over many decades.As important is likely to be the impact on efforts to tackle climate change. The US itself would presumably reverse many measures in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. As significant might be a likely US withdrawal from efforts to promote investment in clean energy in emerging and developing countries.Prospective relations with China must also be in question. Here the changes might not be that dramatic, because hostility to China’s rise is bipartisan. But the opposition to China would be less about ideology under Trump, who cares not a whit about such differences between autocracies and democracies. He rather prefers the former. It would become just a contest over power, with Trump trying to keep the US number one. How differently that would turn out is unclear. Trump might seek to turn Russia against China, as Nixon did China against the Soviet Union. Abandonment of Ukraine might be his bait.One Must-ReadThis article was featured in the One Must-Read newsletter, where we recommend one remarkable story each weekday. Sign up for the newsletter hereA second Trump presidency might not ruin the US forever. But both it and the rest of the world would lose their innocence. We would have to adapt to the reality that the US had re-elected a man who had openly tried to subvert its democracy. It is possible that the indictments against Trump will save the day. But that fragile hope highlights today’s threat to [email protected] Martin Wolf with myFT and on X More

  • in

    Bitcoin (BTC) Forming Pattern You Wouldn’t Like to See Now

    The bull flag pattern is identified by a sharp rise in price, forming the “flagpole,” followed by a consolidative rectangle or a parallelogram that slopes against the trend. This pattern suggests that the market is taking a breath before attempting to continue the previous trend. However, this consolidation is happening amid a backdrop of concerning market dynamics, which could imply an imminent .Source: TradingViewPerforming a technical analysis by examining other indicators such as the Exponential Moving Averages (EMAs), the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and volume trends offers a more nuanced picture. The EMAs show that Bitcoin is still trading above the key moving averages, which typically would be a bullish signal. But with the EMAs beginning to level out, the momentum could be waning.The RSI, a measure of whether an asset is overbought or oversold, is hovering near overbought territory. This suggests that Bitcoin’s price might have risen too quickly, and a retracement could be due. The trading volume has been declining during the formation of the flag pattern, a sign that the upward movement creating the flagpole might not have strong conviction behind it.For traders and investors looking at the short-term picture, this combination of a bull flag pattern with hesitant volume and an overbought RSI could point toward an impending pullback. Such a correction might weed out weak hands and could be healthy for the market, as it allows Bitcoin to reset before attempting another climb.However, it is essential to consider Bitcoin’s intrinsic label as “digital gold.” Over the long term, the fundamental narrative around Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and a store of value in the digital age remains strong. Short-term fluctuations, such as the potential correction hinted at by the current pattern, do not alter the long-term view many hold that Bitcoin could continue to appreciate over the years.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    BorroeFinance, Bitcoin, and Injective Protocol poised to lead next crypto bull market

    Today, BorroeFinance, a blockchain-based platform that transforms invoices into NFTs (non-fungible tokens), is offering various payment options like BTC, USDT, ETH, and BNB. With a $1.45 million presale under its belt, the firm uses robust blockchain technology and AI-driven risk analysis to convert future earnings into instant funds. It is expected that this innovative approach could lead to a 200% post-presale hike in value.Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s potential surge to $150,000 is anticipated following the 2024 halving event. This prediction is based on supply-demand principles and the possibility of the SEC approving a Bitcoin ETF. Such an approval could significantly boost Bitcoin’s value, promising returns comparable to owning high-value assets like a beach house and a Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA).Injective Protocol (INJ) is also making waves in the world of decentralized finance (DeFi). Known as the ‘stealth bomber’ of DeFi, INJ offers a fully decentralized exchange with zero gas fees and a lightning-fast layer-2 solution. This positioning has led many to consider it as a top altcoin in the pursuit of borderless finance.In conclusion, BorroeFinance’s innovative NFT-based crowdfunding, Bitcoin’s potential ETF approval, and Injective Protocol’s advancements in DeFi are shaping up to be key drivers in the next crypto bull market. As these developments unfold, they may alter the landscape of digital finance as we know it.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More

  • in

    Kazakhstan’s authorities confirm they blocked access to Coinbase: Report

    According to a Nov. 7 report from a local news outlet, Kursiv, access to the Coinbase website was blocked by an order from the Ministry of Culture and Information. Ministry representatives explained to journalists that the request came from a different government body, the Ministry of Digital Development, which accused Coinbase of violating the Law on Digital Assets.Continue Reading on Cointelegraph More