More stories

  • in

    Eurozone inflation stays above expectations at 2.2%

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.Eurozone inflation remained at 2.2 per cent in April, surpassing expectations and complicating the European Central Bank’s task as it considers whether to cut interest rates further at its next meeting in June.Economists had predicted that the figure would fall to 2.1 per cent, according to a poll by Reuters.“The ECB will probably look through this surprise,” said TomaszWieladek, economist at T Rowe Price, emphasising that the central bank was increasing its focus on economic activity in the Eurozone, which recent surveys have indicated is weak. “Much lower oil prices and a stronger euro still have yet to fully feed through to inflation,” he added.The euro was flat after the data, as investors continued to bet on rate cuts. It was up 0.4 per cent against the dollar by late afternoon in London at $1.134.Friday’s figure marks the sixth month in a row that inflation in the single currency bloc has been above the ECB’s target of 2 per cent.Annual core inflation, which excludes highly volatile prices for energy and food, rose to 2.7 per cent, surpassing both the previous month’s pace of 2.4 per cent and economists’ expectations of a 2.5 per cent rate.Services inflation — a closely watched metric that the ECB regards as an important gauge of domestic price pressure — increased to 3.9 per cent year over year, after falling to 3.5 per cent in March. Analysts at Capital Economics said the services inflation rise was “unlikely to worry ECB officials too much as it was probably driven mainly by Easter timing effects” and was “unlikely to stand in the way” of further cuts.Economists argue that the year-on-year comparison is distorted by the fact that the Easter holidays — a time when services in hotels, restaurants andother areas tend to rise because of a rise in travel — were in April thisyear but in March last year. Traders put a roughly 90 per cent chance on a quarter-point cut at the ECB’s June meeting, according to levels implied by swaps markets, largely unchanged from before the release. Overall, two or three such cuts are expected by the end of the year.The ECB began lowering rates last summer after battling to tame an unprecedented surge in consumer prices during the coronavirus pandemic, when inflation peaked at 10.6 per cent.ECB rate-setters voted unanimously last month to cut rates by a quarter point to 2.25 per cent, citing concerns over growth amid “rising trade tensions” from US President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda.Christine Lagarde, ECB president, added last month that “most measures of underlying inflation” suggested that the central bank was on track to meet its target “on a sustained basis”.While the Eurozone economy performed better than expected in the first three months of the year, with growth of 0.4 per cent, the announcement of Trump’s so-called “reciprocal duties” has since dented the outlook for the region.“The ECB has indicated it is not as concerned about inflation as it is on growth due to the tariff impact,” said Francesco Pesole, FX strategist at ING. In other circumstances, investors would expect a hawkish shift from the central bank, he added. More

  • in

    Temu abandons Chinese imports to US as tariffs force overhaul

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.Temu has stopped shipping low-cost items from China to sell directly to US consumers, as the Chinese ecommerce company overhauls its business model in response to the Trump administration’s tariffs.Sales on Temu’s US marketplace — which sells households goods ranging from phone chargers to silicone toilet brushes — will now all be fulfilled from US-based sellers, rather than Chinese sellers, it said on Friday. The company, which has been building a network of sellers in the US for more than a year, added that it was actively recruiting more merchants in the country. However, the decision to move away from Chinese sellers means its US business could shrink significantly as a result.The changes have been made as the US scraps its “de minimis” customs rules, which exempted inbound parcels worth less than $800 from import duty. From Friday, low-value shipments from China and Hong Kong will be subject to a 120 per cent tariff or a flat $100 fee, depending on how goods are delivered. The $100 fee will be doubled from June 1. The sudden changes are posing major challenges to Temu and its rival Shein, which sells mostly cheap clothes. Both retailers exploited the “de minimis” exemption to undercut US retailers with cheap Chinese-made goods shipped directly to consumers.The Financial Times reported this week that Shein is exploring whether to shift production for its US business out of China and that its long-awaited London stock market float was likely to be delayed further by the tariff changes. The fast-fashion retailer’s US business accounts for about a third of its $38bn in revenue. Analysts estimate that the US is the biggest market for Temu, which is owned by Chinese company PDD Holdings.“Temu’s pricing for US consumers remains unchanged as the platform transitions to a local fulfilment model,” the company said. “The move is designed to help local merchants reach more customers and grow their businesses. This shift is part of Temu’s ongoing adjustments to improve service levels.” Temu will continue to source from Chinese sellers for its operations in other western countries. Temu and Shein are two prominent victims of the US-China trade war. Washington has imposed tariffs of as much as 145 per cent on most Chinese goods, and China has retaliated with tariffs of 125 per cent. Temu and Shein, which both fuelled their rapid growth with blanket social media advertising, have responded by slashing advertising spending in recent weeks. Chinese officials signalled on Friday that Beijing was “evaluating” recent overtures from the US to begin trade talks. Beijing had previously suggested Washington should drop the steep levies if it wanted it to engage. More

  • in

    Janet Yellen on the ‘real opportunities’ for green investors

    This article is an on-site version of our Moral Money newsletter. Premium subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered three times a week. Standard subscribers can upgrade to Premium here, or explore all FT newsletters.Visit our Moral Money hub for all the latest ESG news, opinion and analysis from around the FT Welcome back.As Treasury secretary under Joe Biden, Janet Yellen was central to his administration’s push to foster a US boom in low-carbon industries of the future. In the three months since Yellen left office, Donald Trump has made serious headway in pulling down the clean energy framework that she and her colleagues built.Yellen — who also previously chaired the Federal Reserve — is keeping some skin in the climate game. She’s just taken a position on the advisory board of Angeleno Group, a Los Angeles-based venture capital firm focused on clean energy and other climate-related businesses.In our conversation this week, Yellen told me why she’s still bullish on the opportunities for green tech investors in the US — even as she warned of severe risks that Trump’s tariff war is creating for the entire national economy.Join global leaders in business, finance and policy on 21-22 May for the Climate & Impact Summit, taking place in London and online. As a newsletter subscriber, you can register for a free digital pass here or secure a discount on your in-person pass here.Janet Yellen enters the climate VC arenaThis transcript has been edited for length and clarity.Simon Mundy: I’m sure you’ve had no shortage of invitations to take various positions since leaving government. Why did you decide to take this one?Janet Yellen: Well, I think climate change is an existential challenge, and addressing it effectively has to involve massive private investment, and I am very impressed with the work and commitment of the Angeleno Group to identifying investments that will be both profitable and also mitigate emissions or deal with adaptation. Over four years during the Biden administration, I tried to use every tool that we had at Treasury to address climate change; most recently, being involved in writing the tax rules for the Inflation Reduction Act. But I really believe that this is an utterly critical global challenge, and that private investment in climate solutions is a key way to address it.SM: As you mentioned, this was a priority for the Biden administration, and there were policies that were seen as very helpful to this space. Now we have a very different administration that is dismantling a lot of that policy framework. How much of it do you think is going to survive?JY: Well, I am certainly concerned about the hostility towards climate change. For example, I think it was yesterday or the day before we saw the entire staff of the National Climate Assessment team sacked, which is discouraging. I’m discouraged about what’s happening to research in this field.That said, the Inflation Reduction Act is an extremely important law. It created enormous incentives for investment in clean energy, and many of the rules have been finalised. Yellen played an important role in the Biden administration’s push to support low-carbon investment More

  • in

    FirstFT: Equity markets rally on hopes for a trade war thaw

    This article is an on-site version of our FirstFT newsletter. Subscribers can sign up to our Asia, Europe/Africa or Americas edition to get the newsletter delivered every weekday morning. Explore all of our newsletters hereGood morning, and happy Friday. Here’s what we’re covering today: Hopes for a thaw in the trade warDonald Trump’s Latin American fan club How the US-Ukraine minerals deal was struckAnd the ‘strange beauty’ of dying at homeSigns of a possible thaw in US-China trade tensions have helped drive global stock markets higher today after Beijing said it was “evaluating” recent overtures from Washington on starting trade talks. Here’s what you need to know.China’s commerce ministry said the US had recently “conveyed messages to China through various channels, expressing a desire to engage in discussions”. The ministry spokesperson said earlier today: “China is currently evaluating this.” Friday’s statement marks a slight softening of Beijing’s stance from last week, when it said Washington would need to drop its steep levies on China for talks to begin, and was first signalled yesterday by a social media account tied to state broadcaster CCTV.What has been the investor reaction? Global equities rallied, with Taiwan’s Taiex climbing 2.7 per cent, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index rising 1.8 per cent and Europe’s Stoxx 600 index gaining 1 per cent. S&P 500 futures climbed 0.5 per cent. The Wall Street benchmark has been buoyed by strong Big Tech earnings this week and is on the brink of erasing all of its losses since Donald Trump’s “liberation day” tariff blitz on April 2 sent global markets into a tailspin. “The peak of uncertainty may be over,” said Wee Khoon Chong, a senior strategist at BNY. Asian currencies rallied against the dollar on signs of easing trade tensions. This story has the latest market prices in the lead up to Wall Street opening. Opinion: If tariffs stay in place, US companies will be in sore need of funds to pay the bills and prepare for other potential shocks, writes Gillian Tett.Here’s what else we’re keeping tabs on today and over the weekend:Economic data: The US government releases monthly employment data later. Economists expect the number of new job openings to have slowed last month compared with March but the unemployment rate to remain at 4.2 per cent. Trump’s tariffs: The “de minimis” exemption for small packages from China closes today and a 25 per cent duty on car parts takes effect tomorrow.Results: Chevron, ExxonMobil, DuPont, T Rowe Price and Cboe Global are among the companies reporting earnings today. HSBC holds its first annual meeting under new chief executive Georges Elhedery and Berkshire Hathaway has its AGM tomorrow.Elections: Australia and Singapore go to the polls on Saturday. Romania’s presidential election takes place on Sunday.How well did you keep up with the news this week? Take our quiz.Five more top stories1. Apple chief executive Tim Cook has warned that Donald Trump’s tariffs will increase costs by $900mn in the current quarter. Apple shares fell 2.75 per cent in after-market trading after Cook’s remarks to analysts. Here’s more on the impact tariffs had on Apple’s results.Amazon: The online retailer’s shares also fell in after-hours trading after it released lower than expected guidance for the current quarter. Microsoft: The software group has emerged as the winner from Big Tech’s first earnings of Trump’s new term. Here’s why. 2. Eurozone inflation remained at 2.2 per cent in April, surpassing expectations and complicating the European Central Bank’s task as it considers whether to cut interest rates further at its next meeting in June. Economists had predicted that the figure would fall to 2.1 per cent in April. Here’s more on the outlook for Eurozone interest rates following today’s inflation numbers.3. Nigel Farage claimed his rightwing populist Reform party was now Britain’s main opposition to Sir Keir Starmer’s government after winning the Runcorn & Helsby by-election, ousting Labour by just six votes. The result capped a night of extraordinary advances by Farage’s party in local elections across the UK.4. Large pension funds and other big institutional investors have started to borrow against their private equity portfolios to raise cash after a slowdown in dealmaking and public offerings has dimmed their hopes of exiting trillions of dollars in ageing deals. The stockpile of unsold private equity deals hit a record $3tn last year, according to Cambridge Associates. Read more on the growing demand for so-called net asset value loans on Wall Street.5. Israeli jets struck near Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s palace this morning in what Benjamin Netanyahu said was a message to Damascus after a wave of sectarian violence involving the Druze minority. The attack marks another escalation in Israel’s military intervention in Syria. Here’s the latest from Malaika Kanaaneh Tapper in Beirut.How should central banks navigate the new world order? Pose questions to Chris Giles and other FT experts about monetary policy, and have them answered in a live Q&A next Wednesday.The Big Read© FT montage/Getty ImagesAs Donald Trump unravels the global trade system and publicly criticises the Federal Reserve, investors more broadly are starting to question the haven status of the dollar and Treasuries — assets that have long formed the bedrock of China’s $3.2tn in foreign reserves. Here’s how Beijing is quietly diversifying from US government bonds.We’re also reading and listening to . . . Chart of the dayAs US factories struggle to find workers, with half a million jobs remaining unfilled in March, the Trump administration has envisaged robots taking up the slack. Industry experts are sceptical, citing several barriers to a rapid acceleration in automation.Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.Take a break from the newsMónica Manzutto, the co-founder of Mexico City’s Kurimanzutto gallery, was born in Colombia but moved to Mexico and settled in the capital. She shares her favourite shops, markets and places to eat mole in her insider’s guide.Restaurante Rosetta More

  • in

    Policymakers fret over rising sovereign debt

    In October, France’s newly appointed prime minister Michel Barnier warned of a “sword of Damocles” hanging over the country — its “colossal” debt.His attempt to address the country’s creaking finances with a €60bn package of tax rises and spending cuts led to the end of his premiership just two months later. A downgrade of France’s credit rating by Moody’s followed, with the agency forecasting a rise in the debt-to-GDP level from 113 per cent in 2024 to 120 per cent by 2027. The risk for France, Moody’s warned, was the effects of a “negative feedback loop between higher deficits, a higher debt load and higher financing costs”.It is a scenario increasingly fretted over by policymakers across the developed world, as they watch debt levels reach or exceed 100 per cent of GDP. Veteran macro investor Ray Dalio has urged national governments to avoid a “debt death spiral”, where their fast-rising debts get out of control as they attempt to raise more money to cover surging interest payments, in turn driving those borrowing costs higher still.The OECD recently estimated that its 38 members were expected to borrow a record $17tn in 2025, up from $16tn last year. “Global debt markets face a difficult outlook,” the organisation warned in its annual debt report in March.Nevertheless, analysts do not believe a sovereign debt sustainability crisis among developed nations is likely in the near term, barring a big policy error. Worries over levels of government borrowing have been around for years, and bond markets have continued to absorb record issuance. Investors point to the power of central banks to arrest any rapid rise in bond yields through emergency asset-purchasing programmes. But a steady ratchet higher in bond yields since the start of the decade — in part due to central banks selling down those crisis holdings — has turned up the temperature. There is also unease about governments’ continuing reliance on fiscal stimulus to try to fuel economic growth.“Governments around the world have got used to running these huge deficits. Everyone has been asking themselves, how high can these deficits go and what is the endgame?” says a senior trader in government bonds.Yields on 30-year US Treasuries topped 5 per cent last month to reach their highest since late 2023, as investors dumped the debt in a sell-off driven by President Donald Trump’s trade war and exacerbated, fund managers say, by fiscal concerns. UK borrowing costs of the same maturity reached their highest since 1998.The rising cost of debt is already affecting governments’ priorities. Barnier’s successor François Bayrou warned last month France would be “heading to a crisis” without spending cuts and highlighted the risk from rising borrowing costs. Interest payments gobbled up 3.3 per cent of GDP across the OECD group of countries last year, the biggest share since at least 2007.“Public debts continue to increase with no limits in sight,” says Koen De Leus, chief economist at BNP Paribas’s Belgian arm. He argues that a “snowball effect is slowly forming” in countries such as the UK and Italy, where average interest rates on debt are beginning to outstrip growth rates. If countries do not at that point balance their budgets, “or better even realise a primary budget surplus, your [debt-to-GDP ratio] gets out of control,” De Leus adds. The US is also “entering the danger zone” on a similar analysis, he says.If the line where huge debts tip into a debt crisis is impossible to draw, turbulence in bond markets in recent months has supported the argument that it is getting closer, with investors regularly highlighting the UK, France and even the US as under pressure.During France’s political crisis at the end of last year, the additional interest rate on its debt relative to Germany’s benchmark Bunds reached its highest level since 2012, as investors feared for the near-term economic outlook. In the UK, the government warned of future tax rises even after it had unveiled a £14bn plan to improve the public finances, as rising yields erased the new chancellor’s wriggle room against her self-imposed fiscal rules. But the biggest worry is the near-$30tn Treasuries market, which not only funds US government spending but also provides the bedrock safe asset of the global financial system.Beyond the recent sharp sell off triggered by Trump launching his trade war, the size of the budget deficit, at more than 6 per cent of GDP, is a key concern highlighted by fund managers, along with the potential for it to deteriorate further through the president’s tax-cutting agenda. The Bank of England dropped a sale of long-dated bonds in the recent turmoil, underlining the threat to broader markets. Some commentators argue that these episodes are connected, reflecting that the bond market has moved into a new period of antagonism, where investors are putting pressure on governments to improve their finances. This is a policing role it has played in times past. “The bond vigilantes have come back following years of hibernation,” says BNP’s De Leus.Even Germany, a historically reluctant borrower, is turning on the fiscal taps, leading a European charge to increase defence spending. Many argue that a move higher in yields can be explained by normal inflationary pressures and doomsaying over debt is overdone. “Everyone is always worrying about government bond supply,” says Nick Hayes, a fund manager at Axa’s investment management arm. He argues supply is relatively easy to forecast, with countries telegraphing their borrowing plans, while demand is “near impossible” to predict. “So therefore people ‘overweight’ the worry about supply and ‘underweight’ an assumption on demand,” he adds.Big economies could avert problems if they can manage to stoke higher growth, or be forced to live with a higher level of inflation than they would have endured otherwise to “inflate away” some of their debt. All-important US Treasury yields, despite the recent sell-off, remain below levels seen two years ago. Many investors view the current level of yields as a hugely attractive entry point.Pete Drewienkiewicz, chief investment officer at consultancy Redington, argues long-dated gilts offer an attractive yield against peers and could outperform, given the UK’s “determined focus on fiscal responsibility”.One area where there is broad agreement is that yield curves will remain steep in an environment of greater debt supply. The extra interest rate paid on 30-year US debt versus 2-year debt has reached its highest in three years, and longer for the UK. Some bondholders expect governments to issue a greater proportion of short-term debt, to insulate themselves from higher long-term yields. The UK has said it would do so this year.Robert Dishner, senior portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman, argues that governments rolling their debt over more frequently would face “prices being determined on how well they are doing fiscal consolidation”, be that less spending, higher taxes or better growth.He adds: “More than a sovereign debt meltdown, markets are likely to keep governments on shorter leashes.” More

  • in

    Trump’s market mayhem threatens to upend world order

    The turmoil in financial markets triggered by Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs has prompted comparisons with the mayhem unleashed by former UK prime minister Liz Truss’ disastrous mini-Budget nearly three years ago. The US president’s “liberation day” launch of a global trade war and Truss’s unfunded tax cuts both spooked investors and threatened to unhinge the financial system. Given the economic might of the US, Trump’s determination to reshape the global economic order looks certain to have a far more lasting impact on the financial system than Truss, who was ousted after only seven weeks.Many on Wall Street had initially cheered Trump’s election victory in November as he committed to turbo charge growth by unwinding regulation, slashing bureaucracy and cutting taxes on his return to the White House. Since then, though, the president has given financiers and regulators more cause for concern than for celebration.Central to these fears is the worry that a protectionist US administration, that treats the key multilateral economic institutions, such as the IMF, World Bank and G20, with disdain, will fragment the global financial system.“The current US administration’s tariffs are part of a broader programme of economic nationalism and using such tools to pursue geopolitical objectives,” says Lisa Quest, co-head of the government and public institutions practice for Europe at consultants Oliver Wyman. A study published in January by Oliver Wyman and the World Economic Forum estimated fragmentation could lead to annual economic output losses of between $600bn to $5.7tn. At the top end, that would mean wiping out 5 per cent of global GDP — double the output losses caused by the 2020 coronavirus pandemic.“It is not just the actual cost but it is the cost of uncertainty and the impact on trust,” says Quest. “Many of these markets operate on the basis of stability and trust and there will be an additional cost that comes from losing that trust.”The recent sharp falls in US share prices, sell-off in Treasuries and a depreciating dollar suggest Trump’s volatile policymaking is eroding investors’ confidence and causing capital flight out of American assets.Jamie Dimon, chief executive of the biggest US bank JPMorgan Chase, told the FT in a recent interview that he worried about a potential threat to his country’s traditional status as “a haven” because of its prosperity, rule of law and economic and military strength.Trump has also been alarming boardrooms by targeting law firms that have represented his political opponents, launching wide-ranging investigations into diversity policies at companies and cutting off funding to leading universities such as Harvard. “Clients are gripped by uncertainty and fear of reprisals,” says Anna Pinedo, a partner at US law firm Mayer Brown specialising in capital markets. “There is a hesitancy to make investment decisions. Boards and management teams are particularly fearful that they could be targeted because of decisions they make. It is a very difficult climate to operate in.”President Trump’s recent policies have given financiers and regulators more cause for concern More