More stories

  • in

    BlackRock China funds named in US lawmaker probe suffer outflows

    Latest news on ETFsVisit our ETF Hub to find out more and to explore our in-depth data and comparison toolsAccusations by the US House Select Committee that BlackRock was profiting from investments that help the Chinese military were followed by significant outflows in four of the named funds, Morningstar data for August shows.Four out of the five BlackRock funds highlighted by the committee experienced outflows in August, with three of them witnessing a significant drop in net flows, according to Morningstar data. The $21.6bn iShares MSCI Emerging Markets exchange traded fund saw the largest outflows, bleeding $1.9bn in August, followed by outflows of $89mn from the $7.6bn iShares MSCI China ETF.The $290mn iShares MSCI China A ETF had outflows of $14mn, while a net $2mn in cash left the $17mn BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund.This article was previously published by Ignites Asia, a title owned by the FT Group.The iShares MSCI China ETF, iShares MSCI China A ETF and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund lost 4.27 per cent, 7.97 per cent and minus 5.4 per cent over the year to August 30 respectively, according to Morningstar data.These funds have investments in 20 Chinese companies that have been identified by the committee as “posing national security risks and acting against US interests”.US lawmakers subsequently sent letters to the US funds giant in early August, requesting explanations regarding their holdings in these blacklisted Chinese firms.However, analysts argue that the outflows were not necessarily driven by political concerns.Jeff Tjornehoj, US-based senior director of fund insights at Broadridge, noted that flows to ETFs with a focus on the China region have been negative in four of the past five months, suggesting the outflows were more a consequence of the result of “poor performance” in Chinese equities.However, he acknowledged that some investors could “shy away” from those funds to “avoid controversy”.Bryan Armour, director of passive strategies research for North America at Morningstar, said some investors did choose to sell shares in response to the investigation, but he would not expect the letter to have a “large impact” on the investing community.The increasing number of “cracks appearing in China’s economy” was a “larger catalyst” for the outflows, he argued.“Many investors piled into China and emerging markets funds when China began to reopen its economy and remove Covid-related restrictions at the beginning of this year,” he said.“As growth targets missed the mark and risks increased, it is reasonable to expect investors to lose interest in the China-reopening trade, especially as developed markets outpaced emerging ones,” he added.Gerard DeBenedetto, partner at Tan Lane Holdings Limited, agreed, saying that investors pulled money out as “the risk profile for Chinese stocks has changed”.“Allocators and investors are not immune from the constant headlines of China trade, property and demographics,” he said.BlackRock recently shut down a Luxembourg-domiciled China equities fund due to “lack of new investor interest” amid China’s faltering economic recovery and an ongoing slowdown in mainland stocks.The ongoing stock market volatility and underperformance of equities funds in the market have led to a significant reduction in investor risk appetite for China-focused stock strategies in many markets.Mutual funds focused on China saw $647mn inoutflows in the second quarter of this year, compared with net inflows of $1bn into emerging markets ex-China strategies, and the 10 largest China-focused mutual funds have seen their assets shrink by 40 per cent since 2021.Global emerging market funds with exposure to China equities have also been shifting away from China, with the average China exposure among 1,048 actively managed global emerging market equities funds falling by 3.2 percentage points to 24.7 per cent in the first seven months of this year.There are some managers who remain optimistic about the China market, however, citing low valuations and the long-term opportunities in the growing wealth of Chinese consumers.Jonathan Krane, founder and chief executive of KraneShares, said China funds and investments had been “oversold” due to geopolitics, not fundamentals.He believed that US investors are beginning to see a “real buying opportunity” in China.“Investors are recognising the opportunity following positive developments around economic stimulus measures and stock market reforms in China,” Krane said.Latest news on ETFsVisit the ETF Hub to find out more and to explore our in-depth data and comparison tools helping you to understand everything from performance to ESG ratings“Chinese consumers continue to grow wealthier and offer a long-term, strategic investment growth opportunity,” he said.He added that communications between the US and China had “increased dramatically”, with four state visits by the US in just the past three months, which “should help improve sentiment”.Franklin Templeton president and chief executive Jenny Johnson also expressed enthusiasm for China’s innovation-focused sectors this week at a conference in Singapore.She said the current bearish sentiment around China was “probably overhyped”, with the Chinese economy set to “rubber band back up” eventually.*Ignites Asia is a news service published by FT Specialist for professionals working in the asset management industry. Trials and subscriptions are available at ignitesasia.com. More

  • in

    Riding the Chinese dragon gets a lot harder for investors

    The top search suggestions on YouTube for videos with the prompt “Chinese economy” include: “is about to collapse”, “is 60 [per cent] smaller than we thought”, and, simply, “is done”.China-bound investors using the site to do some due diligence would be overwhelmed by bearish views and have to look hard for a bull. The rise in amateur doomsayer analysts on China on sites such as YouTube and Reddit echoes the negative opinions of many professional investment advisers. It has helped drive an exodus of foreign financial investment out of China. In August alone, foreign investors (including institutions) dumped a record $12bn of stocks listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen, more than any time since the launch of the stock connect scheme in 2014.Retail savers are active in the exodus. In the UK, the Investment Association, the trade body, says they have been withdrawing money from China funds on a net basis for the past five years.IA figures suggest that UK investors now hold less of their individual savings accounts — a key retail savings vehicle — in China-only funds than they do in India-only funds, even though India’s economy is a fifth of the size.Fears of arbitrary political crackdowns on Chinese companies and sectors, worsening geopolitical tensions between the West and China and a lack of trust and transparency in the Chinese economy have put off many investors.The economy has also run into some serious economic turmoil: growth has slowed, the debt-laden property sector is in crisis and the government is hesitant to launch a full-scale stimulus programme to reverse the effects of the country’s disruptive zero-Covid policy.FT Money examines whether China is still a land of opportunity for foreign retail investors. If it is, what should savers buy? If not, how can they build a globally diversified equities portfolio without the world’s second-largest economy?Can the dragon can ride high again?The bull case for Chinese equities is simple — just look at the long term. China’s growth rate from 2000 to 2022 averaged 8 per cent. Even now, as China faces difficulties, the IMF estimates that the country will still generate some 35 per cent of global growth this year.It has 12 of the world’s 100 largest companies by market capitalisation, according to Bloomberg. Its companies are poised to dominate new industries such as electric vehicles, batteries and electronics. With 1.4bn people, it has the world’s second-largest population after India and a fast-expanding middle class.Bullish analysts believe short-term headwinds do not negate the opportunities. “With a large population, rapidly growing middle class, and ambitious economic reforms, China offers a compelling opportunity for investors,” says Joe Hills, lead investment analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.“The country is positioning itself as a global leader in various industries, from ecommerce giants and renewable energy to advanced manufacturing and artificial intelligence. With careful research, understanding of local dynamics, and a long-term perspective, investors can tap into the enormous potential that China offers.”Investors who remain bullish on China claim that the current economic slowdown is cyclical, not structural, meaning that at some point growth will return to impressive levels. Beijing has set an official target of around 5 per cent growth for this year, although most major global banks now project that it will underperform this by up to 0.5 percentage points.A recent analyst note from Bank of America supports this thesis, claiming that cyclical forces holding back the Chinese economy do not mean its growth potential has “collapsed”. The bulls believe that while a wholesale US-style stimulus package is unlikely in China, the government will unveil targeted measures, following the recent selective interest rate cuts. Alice Wang, China portfolio manager at Quaero Capital, says: “Many investors assumed it was going to be a giant national package like the US. But I think the Chinese government does have the capability to do targeted stimulus for cities and industries that need it.”Goldman analysts note that Chinese equities are now historically cheap. The MSCI China index and the CSI 300, the largest China A share stocks, trade at “suppressed valuations” in price/earnings terms — below both five-year averages and, respectively, at 40 and 30 per cent discounts to the average of developed market and non-China emerging markets. Or has the dragon lost its fire? © Daniel CrespoBut the bears too have a strong story. Long-term structural weaknesses of the economy are well known to retail investors and YouTube watchers alike. The country is no longer reaping a demographic dividend and the ratio of workers to dependants will only worsen, stifling productivity and redirecting spending priorities. The country is also transitioning from a low-cost manufacturing hub to a higher-value producer as wages rise and assembly factories move to lower-cost countries such as Vietnam and India. This has been worsened by “friend-shoring” and “nearing-shoring” trends where Western companies shift their supply chains out of China.Analysts say that the years of infrastructure and property-fuelled growth are over, as the property market is more saturated and the marginal returns from new public infrastructure are lower. “I think China has fewer tools in the bag to do this massive stimulus,” says Vivian Lin Thurston, portfolio manager at William Blair. “A big stimulus would be like a drug that helps in the short run but might worsen structural issues like the property sector in the long run.”International investors are voting with their feet. A recent Bank of America survey of 258 money managers with $678bn in assets under management found that a third of fund managers believed the Chinese commercial real estate crisis was the biggest threat to the global economy. The survey recorded managers moving out of China and other emerging markets and into the US.In the short term, many investors also fear politics. Sanctions levied by the US on China could hurt tech and manufacturing companies. Meanwhile, companies that find themselves on the wrong side of Chinese government domestic policies can see their share price plunge. Most recently Beijing has launched an “anti-corruption” campaign on the healthcare industry, which has led to the CSI medical service index (healthcare stocks within the CSI 300) falling by 5 per cent since the start of July.The policy shift from Beijing on the sector, in some part due to a suspicion that it overly profited from the country’s “zero Covid” policy for almost three years, mirrors previous crackdowns on the high-growth education and tech sectors that hit investors hard.Even in more benign times, the Chinese stock market may have produced commercial giants, but it persistently lagged behind economic growth. Chinese nominal GDP in renminbi was more than nine times higher in 2022 than in 2002 but the CSI 300 index was less than 200 per cent higher.This suggests that equity investors have not received the full benefit of the economic advance. There is indeed no automatic link between growth in GDP and the stock market in any economy. And in China it’s been particularly weak, given the high level of government intervention in the economy. Foreign investors, in particular, have had difficulty anticipating policy shifts — and are likely to remain so in the coming years.How can bullish investors get China exposure?Investing in China means getting to grips with listing jurisdictions. China A shares are mainland-listed securities quoted in Chinese renminbi. Retail investors can buy them through a stock connect scheme with Hong Kong. China H shares are Hong Kong-listed equities quoted in Hong Kong dollars. Then there are Chinese companies listed abroad. As of January 2023, 252 Chinese companies were listed on the three biggest US exchanges. The largest of these is internet giant Alibaba.If you want some China exposure without buying specific stocks, the simplest way is to buy the index. The CSI 300 is the 300 largest China A-share stocks by market capitalisation. The MSCI China is broader and includes H shares and foreign listings, as well as mid-cap companies. Asset managers such as BlackRock offer low-cost access to the MSCI China index through their iShares ETFs. The Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF offers a similar service. But in the same way that “buying the S&P 500” now means in essence buying US technology companies with some healthcare and financial services names thrown in, these indices give greater weight to certain dominant sectors, such as consumer technology.Investors wanting a more granular approach can consider separate sectors and companies.One story that managers tell is of the Chinese consumer. Even if high tech companies such as Huawei run into problems with trade sanctions, they say, the growing Chinese middle classes with their rising incomes will continue to support domestic consumer companies, which also appear more insulated from the kinds of policy crackdowns that have hit tech, education and healthcare.Names such as trip.com (formerly Ctrip), a travel platform travel, PDD, an ecommerce platform and Meituan, best known for its food delivery app, are often mentioned as defensive stocks that could do well as long as city dwellers have disposable income. One other company of interest is Kweichow Moutai, maker of luxury grain alcohol baijiu, which is often seen as a proxy for business dealing in China given its consumption at official banquets. It has been at some points in the last decade China’s largest company.Chinese technology stocks that are still able to excite include Tencent, which is China’s largest company by market capitalisation and runs the WeChat “superapp” that US billionaire Elon Musk is eager to imitate with his company, X.In manufacturing, investor excitement focuses on China’s dominance of electric vehicles and battery production. This year the country is set to become both the world’s largest exporter of electric vehicles and of automobiles more broadly. “We saw Chinese companies rise up very quickly to become leaders on a global scale, such as energy transition related industries like EV and batteries,” says Thurston at William Blair.Certainly, there are risks: it is unclear, for example, what the impact will be of the EU anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese EVs.But Jason Hsu, founder of Hong-Kong based quantitative asset manager Rayliant says that Chinese EV makers such as Warren Buffett-backed BYD, which makes both batteries and EVs, are “cost leaders”. “Imagine if you could buy Toyota in the 1980s,” he says. BYD stock is up 25 per cent year to date, at $65 per share.Another name that attracts international attention is EV maker Xpeng, which in July received a $700mn investment from Volkswagen. It announced this month that it would start selling cars in Western Europe next year. The stock price is up 80 per cent this year, which might mean this opportunity has passed but others will emerge in China’s teeming EV sector.Retail investors might also consider that when they invest in Chinese companies, they are not necessarily playing against big institutional money but Chinese retail investors. Research from CEIC and UBS from 2018 found that Chinese retail investors were responsible for 86 per cent of the trading volume of A-shares. One result is that Chinese stocks are volatile, with animal spirits and online “pump and dump” schemes abounding. The government is moving to crack down on market moving “little essays” that circulate on social media. But the upside of this phenomenon is that there is potential for smart investors to generate alpha by taking advantage of these sentiment swings, according to Hsu of Rayliant. Actively-managed funds could be one way of playing this, such as Fidelity’s China Special Situations Investment Trust, which, as well as holding equities, holds illiquid names such as TikTok owner ByteDance and drone maker DJI. Baillie Gifford, JPMorgan and Invesco all have China funds that are among the 10 most owned by retail investors on Hargreaves Lansdown.Additional reporting by Louis Ashworth What can bearish investors do?For a start, you can stay away from China. That’s simple enough.Sophisticated investors, with a risk appetite, could go one better — and short the market. They could, for example, consider the Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X Shares, which offers the opportunity to make a three-times leveraged bet against the FTSE China 50 index. It is not for the faint-hearted.“These [funds] are not buy-and-hold vehicles,” says Ed Egilinsky, managing director at Direxion. “They are designed for short-term trading . . . people trade off [negative] headlines about China.”Retail investors who don’t want their money exposed to the China market’s tribulations, while still looking to capitalise on emerging market growth could look at other Asian states.According to Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, India, the Philippines and Indonesia offer some of the lowest correlated returns in Asia to China, while still being rapidly growing economies with large populations.Meanwhile, investors who want some exposure to China through indirect means might consider other emerging markets. Analysts at Robeco tracked the correlation of the Chinese constituents of the MSCI emerging markets index with those of the MSCI EM ex-China index; it now sits at about 50 per cent. An even more straightforward way is to look at the many Western companies with significant interests in China. To name a few: Apple, LVMH and Unilever. More

  • in

    Ethereum Faces First Important Resistance Level on Its Way Up

    As of the latest data, Ethereum is trading at around $1,618.43. The 21 EMA has proven to be a formidable barrier, acting as the ceiling that Ethereum needs to crack to sustain its climb. It is like a glass ceiling, visible but tough to shatter. This resistance level is crucial because it often serves as a litmus test for investor sentiment and future price action.Source: TradingViewBut there is another twist in the tale. Ethereum, once celebrated for its deflationary mechanism, is no longer enjoying that status. Why? Well, network activity has dipped to extremely low levels. The buzz and hustle that usually surround Ethereum have quieted down, affecting its deflationary nature. This low activity could be a contributing factor to Ethereum’s struggle with the 21 EMA resistance.What’s next for ? The 21 EMA remains the key focus. Breaking it could open the door to a more bullish scenario, while failure to do so might signal a bearish trend. Either way, the coming days are pivotal for Ethereum, especially as it tries to regain its deflationary status amid low network activity.As of the latest data, (SOL) is trading at approximately $18.6. While this might not scream “bull market,” it is essential to look beyond the surface. The trading volume and open interest in Solana have seen a noticeable uptick. These are classic indicators of accumulation, suggesting that some big players are quietly buying up SOL.Why the sudden interest? Well, the recent fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) surrounding Solana might not be as grounded in reality as some would have you believe. Whales, who often have access to better information and analytics, seem to understand this. They appear to be taking advantage of the situation, buying the dip while everyone else is selling.The surge in trading volume and open interest is a telltale sign that funds are moving in the background. These metrics often precede price movement, and in this case, they are pointing upward. It is as if the market is whispering, “Hey, pay attention; something’s about to happen here.”But here’s the kicker: Solana is no longer just the flavor of the month; it is becoming a staple in diversified crypto portfolios. While the broader market continues its roller coaster ride, Solana’s underlying fundamentals remain strong.But here’s the twist: trading volume is dwindling. Generally, a decrease in volume during a downtrend could signal a potential reversal or at least a pause in downward momentum. It is like the market is holding its breath, waiting for the next big move.Adding another layer to this complex picture is the Relative Strength Index (RSI). On Sept. 11, the RSI for ADA bottomed out. When the RSI hits rock bottom, it often indicates that the asset is oversold and could be due for a rebound. But remember, RSI is just one piece of the puzzle; it is not a crystal ball.What’s the takeaway? Cardano is at a pivotal point. The declining volume and bottomed-out RSI could be the market’s subtle hint toward a potential turnaround. But for now, the 21 EMA remains a formidable barrier that ADA has yet to conquer.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    Coinbase CEO urges DeFi protocols to challenge regulatory actions in court

    Last week, the CFTC took action against operators of three DeFi platforms, Opyn, ZeroEx, and Deridex, for “offering illegal digital asset derivatives trading.” The agency’s enforcement director, Ian McGinley, had previously labeled unregulated DeFi exchanges as an “obvious threat” to regulated markets and customers. As a result of the charges, these protocols agreed to pay civil monetary penalties totaling $250,000, $200,000, and $100,000 respectively.Armstrong questioned the validity of these charges and the applicability of the Commodity Exchange Act to DeFi protocols. He stated that these are not financial service businesses and suggested that the regulatory actions were pushing an important industry offshore. He encouraged DeFi protocols not to settle but instead to challenge these cases in court to establish a legal precedent.The Coinbase CEO’s comments have sparked a debate within the crypto community. Some social media users agreed with Armstrong’s stance, while others questioned how a decentralized protocol could take something to court and whether many DeFi platforms are truly decentralized.This is not the first time the CFTC has taken action against DeFi protocols. The agency has previously handled cases against Polymarket and Ooki DAO. Polymarket settled with the CFTC for $1.4 million, while the agency secured a victory in its case against Ooki DAO in June.These cases demonstrate the CFTC’s commitment to enforcing existing regulations within the DeFi space, regardless of whether DeFi products are offered in a centralized or decentralized manner. However, Armstrong’s comments highlight the ongoing tension between regulators and the burgeoning DeFi industry.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More