More stories

  • in

    Yellen warns of risks of over-concentration of clean energy supply chains

    LAS VEGAS (Reuters) – The United States is working to build resilient, diversified clean energy supply chains to protect its economic security, while guarding against the risks posed by over-concentration in a handful of countries, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in remarks prepared for an event in Las Vegas on Monday.Yellen will touch on the challenges of transitioning away from fossil fuels in a major speech she will deliver after touring a union facility where workers are learning skills to work on clean energy projects.Yellen’s speech comes days before the one-year anniversary of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which includes $500 billion in new spending and tax breaks that aim to boost clean energy, reduce healthcare costs, and increase tax revenues.Yellen plans to laud the continuing resilience of the U.S. economy while underscoring the importance of key legislation like the IRA in helping to rebuild the U.S. manufacturing base and “reduce chokepoints, mitigate disruptions, and protect our economic security.””As we move away from fossil fuels, we remain concerned about the risks of over-concentration in clean energy supply chains,” she said in excerpts of the speech obtained by Reuters. “Today, the production of critical clean energy inputs – from batteries to solar panels to critical minerals – is concentrated in a handful of countries.”A report by the International Energy Agency earlier this year noted that China holds at least 60% of the world’s manufacturing capacity for most mass-manufactured technologies, such as solar photovoltaic and wind systems, and 40% of electrolyser manufacturing. It said critical minerals needed for these industries were also highly concentrated, with the Democratic Republic of Congo supplying 70% of cobalt, China 60% of rare earth elements, and Indonesia 40% of nickel. Australia accounts for 55% of lithium mining and Chile for 25%, it said.Yellen said the U.S. was investing domestically to build more resilient and diversified supply chains, while helping other countries accelerate their own energy transitions.”The IRA is helping re-shore some of the production that is critical to our clean energy economy,” she said. “Accelerating these transitions can mean greater demand for U.S. clean energy technologies produced by American workers. It can also bolster global clean energy supply chains.”Yellen will speak at a training center operated by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) union.The remarks in Nevada, likely to be a key battleground state in the 2024 presidential election, are part of a month-long travel blitz by President Joe Biden and his cabinet as they work to convince skeptical Americans that their policies are working to boost economic growth and fight global warming.The U.S. economy has outrun recession warnings with record-low unemployment, strong wage gains and better-than-expected GDP growth, but many voters who backed Biden in 2020 think the economy has faired poorly, and may not vote for him in the 2024 election, a Reuters/Ipsos poll released last week showed. More

  • in

    iPhone maker Foxconn’s cautious pivot to India shows limits of ‘China plus one’

    When Foxconn chair Young Liu was in Tamil Nadu two weeks ago to discuss more investment by the iPhone manufacturer in the southern Indian state, two ministers from neighbouring Karnataka sought him out for their own meeting — and later produced documents claiming Foxconn also intended to build two factories in their state.While Foxconn insisted it had not committed to any project, the Karnataka government’s lobbying was a sign of the intense competition brewing in India to attract more investment from the world’s biggest contract electronics manufacturer, as Apple and other tech companies diversify away from their reliance on China.Multinationals’ desire for a “China plus one” strategy, following supply chain disruptions and geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing, is driving Foxconn into a renewed push into India, where it first invested 15 years ago but where it still only employs some 50,000 of its 1mn global workforce.In recent months the group has broken ground for a factory near Hyderabad , the capital of Telangana state, that government officials said would make smart headphones, and it has acquired land near the airport in the Karnataka capital Bengaluru for an iPhone plant. Another site near Hyderabad and two more in Karnataka are in the planning stage, according to an internal Foxconn presentation reviewed by the Financial Times.Foxconn on Monday said it now expected a slight drop in revenue, rather than flat growth, this year as it reported a 1 per cent fall in second-quarter net earnings compared with last year. But Liu also told investors that the company expected to invest “several billion dollars” in India and to start making key components for consumer electronics and some electric vehicle components next year in Karnataka, Telangana and Tamil Nadu, its largest existing iPhone assembly hub. “Ever since 2018 there has been this move to try to have a more geographically diversified tech supply chain,” said Gokul Hariharan, head of Asian technology research at JPMorgan. “During the pandemic, we saw some of these things delayed. But since last year, when things started to normalise a bit, diversification has picked up.”India now accounts for $10bn of Foxconn’s annual revenue, according to the presentation. That is 4.6 per cent of the company’s $216bn 2022 revenue, more than double the 2 per cent registered in 2021. Still, the push into India is also revealing limits to Foxconn’s willingness and ability to diversify. Foxconn executives and other observers dismiss the expectation that India could come even close to matching China’s role as a global technology manufacturing hub.“China can still supply the US and a lot of other foreign markets,” said a Foxconn executive. “In India, building a supply chain to satisfy the growing domestic market, that is reasonable — and then that can become a production base for a limited region, the markets in the vicinity of India.”Liu has said China accounts for 75 per cent of Foxconn’s global operations, up from 70 per cent before the pandemic. He has not given a target for a more distributed footprint, reflecting a decidedly cautious attitude towards India.According to Foxconn’s internal presentation, it currently has nine campuses in India with 36 factories. Its operations are mainly concentrated in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, producing smartphones, feature phones — mobile phones with fewer functions than smartphones — television sets and set-top boxes for customers including Sony, Xiaomi and Apple.In a domestic market dominated by Chinese-made feature phones and Androids, Indians are starting to buy upscale iPhones in greater numbers. Apple this year opened its first two stores in the country in Mumbai and New Delhi.For Narendra Modi’s government, electronics is a key part of its “Make in India” programme meant to boost investment in the country’s chronically underperforming manufacturing sector. Seeking to secure more of the factory jobs that have for decades gone to China and south-east Asia’s export-led economies, India is offering investors billions of dollars’ worth of production-linked incentives (PLI). But a person close to Foxconn said India’s subsidies were hard to get. “Money under PLI is disbursed only based on previous-year shipments, and even under new policies that allow subsidies to be disbursed upfront, like for semiconductor ventures, many have not qualified,” the person said.One example is the agreement struck last year between Foxconn and Indian resources group Vedanta. The companies said they intended to set up a semiconductor and display production complex in Modi’s native state of Gujarat.However, Foxconn severed its partnership with the heavily indebted Indian company last month after the pair failed to secure government approval for a chipmaking subsidy. Both companies have said they intend to reapply separately under a modified call for projects by the government. Executives said in private that subsidies were the decisive factor for any new project. If the level of budget support was right, Foxsemicon, the group’s chip-tool subsidiary, could consider setting up a plant in Bengaluru, people familiar with the company’s decision making said.Foxconn is also exploring opportunities in India for electric vehicles. But while the company’s hopes for future growth and higher margins rest on this segment, executives believe it will be years until the market is mature enough to justify a major move.That leaves the group’s traditional main business of smartphone manufacturing.Liu said on Monday that Foxconn would help bring smaller suppliers to India by developing more large industrial parks.But people familiar with the company’s plans said smartphone component production in India would be largely limited to Foxconn group companies for the time being because a big portion of the China-based supply chain consists of Chinese producers, which are having difficulty getting allowed into India.Another big question is how far Foxconn can make its India operation more cost-effective, which is key in a business with razor-thin profit margins. Neither India — nor any other of the newer production bases such as Vietnam — can accommodate single campuses with 100,000 workers such as the ones Foxconn runs in China, according to industry executives, who argue that most Indian workers refuse to leave their homes for a faraway job and live in a dormitory.

    With Apple pushing for a faster increase in production, Foxconn is testing the limits of those assumptions, expanding its 24 existing dormitories and building new ones. A person familiar with its India operations said that while it was “highly unlikely” that any single India campus would house 100,000 employees or more, there was significant room for scaling up operations with a network of bases not far from one another where at least part of the staff lived on site.Still, analysts believe this would incur steep costs — and even then have limits.“China will still be the primary location for the high-volume consumer products,” said JPMorgan’s Hariharan. “They will probably add one or two locations for different products, but we will not get one big hub again — that may just not be feasible.” More

  • in

    Italy PM Meloni takes ‘full responsibility’ for bank tax

    In comments to Italian newspapers Corriere della Sera, la Repubblica and La Stampa, Meloni said the 40% levy had no punitive intent.”I would do it again. Because I believe that the right things must be done…This is a decision that I took (on my own)”, she was quoted as saying by la Repubblica.”It’s a sensitive issue and I take full responsibility for it.” In a drive to shore up its political base, Italy’s conservative government unveiled the surprise decision late last Monday, only to backtrack in part by clarifying there was a cap on proceeds 24 hours later – and after having changed the threshold to apply the tax in the meantime. The new tax targets a rise in profits banks have derived from higher rates.Sources told Reuters when the measure was announced the Treasury expected to draw less than 3 billion euros ($3.3 billion) from the tax. However, prior to the clarification on the cap, calculations pointed to much higher sums.With Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti noticeably absent from the press conference to announce the tax, Meloni said he had been informed about the decision.However, other government members had been kept in the dark because of the sensitivity of the matter, she said.The government had toyed with the idea of taxing banks’ record profits from higher rates but appeared to have set it aside, and Rome’s muddled communication over the issue has caused alarm among international investors.Asked about a veto posed by junior coalition partner Forza Italian on a potential alliance with France’s Marie Le Pen at next year’s EU parliamentary elections, she said it was too early to discuss any such moves.”I don’t veto anyone, I don’t feel I have the authority to do that and in any case it’s premature”, she said. More

  • in

    China central bank seen leaving policy loan rate unchanged on Tuesday

    Tumbling credit growth and rising deflation risks in July have called for more monetary easing measures to arrest the slowdown, market watchers said, but a weakening Chinese yuan has constrained the central bank’s efforts to imminently ease policy.”MLF rate cuts are seen as less likely at this juncture given the weakness in the yuan – USD/RMB is currently attempting to make a fresh year-to-date high,” analysts at HSBC said in a note.In a poll of 26 market watchers conducted this week, 20 participants, or 77%, predicted that the central bank would leave the interest rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) loans unchanged when it is due to roll over 400 billion yuan ($55.11 billion) worth of such maturing loans on Tuesday.The remaining six traders and analysts in the survey all expected a marginal rate reduction.The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) last lowered the rate by 10 basis points to 2.65% in June. Retail sales, industrial output and investment data due on Tuesday will provide more clues on the direction of borrowing costs. The yuan has lost about 5% to the dollar so far this year to become one of the worst performing Asian currencies. [CNY/]China remains an outlier among global central banks as it has loosened monetary policy to shore up a stalling recovery but further rate cuts will widen the yield gap with the United States, putting more pressure on the yuan and risking outflows.”We believe more pro-growth policies are warranted to support the economic growth, and further easing in monetary policy can be expected,” analysts at BofA Global Research said.”That said, as policymakers vowed to ‘ensure the exchange rate is basically stable at a reasonable and balanced level’ during July’s Politburo meeting, we see limited space for significant monetary easing in the near term.”They expect a 15-basis-point cut in one-year loan prime rate (LPR) in total in the third quarter of the year. A reserve requirement ratio (RRR) cut was also a possibility to help restore credit demand.The MLF rate serves as a guide to the LPR and markets mostly use the former as a precursor to any changes to the lending benchmarks.In derivatives market, one-year interest rate swaps, a gauge that measures investor expectations of funding costs in the future, fell to 1.90% on Monday, the lowest since October 2022, suggesting some market participants are pricing in further rate reductions.($1 = 7.2581 Chinese yuan) More

  • in

    Analysis – US loss of AAA badge a reminder of ‘regime shift’ for government debt

    (Reuters) – Financial markets barely flinched when Fitch stripped the United States of its top credit rating, but it served as a reminder of longer-term structural risks investors in government bonds are yet to grasp.The immediate focus in the aftermath of the Aug. 1 downgrade has been on U.S. governance, but Fitch Ratings also flagged higher rates driving up debt service costs, an aging population and rising healthcare spending, echoing challenges that reverberate globally.David Katimbo-Mugwanya, head of fixed income at EdenTree Investment Management, a 3.7 billion-pound ($4.71 billion)charity-owned investor, said with the move highlighting reflecting elevated debt levels at a time when interest rates will likely remain high, debt sustainability was back in focus.”I think it really brings home that shift being a regime shift rather than a cyclical one,” Katimbo-Mugwanya said.Pressures investors will eventually face include ageing populations, climate change and geopolitical tensions.Such risks are making some investors, including hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, bet on rising longer-term borrowing costs. Yet many investors say factors at play are too complex and their impact too far out to influence their investment decisions.”The rating agencies are not looking at them in a systemic way. And the investors even less,” said Moritz Kraemer, former head of sovereign ratings at S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI), now chief economist at German lender LBBW.WARNING SIGNSThere is no shortage of research sounding alarm.Without cuts to age-related spending, median net government debt will rise to 101% of gross domestic product in advanced and 156% in emerging economies by 2060, S&P Global Ratings said in a study this year.S&P said the assumption that governments would prioritise servicing debt over spending promises had rarely been tested at such high debt levels.It expects policy steps that will make ageing-related costs more manageable. Not taking them would see creditworthiness deteriorate and half the governments it rates would have metrics associated with junk credit ratings while even top-rated governments would lose the highest ratings, S&P said.For the European Union and the euro area, where public pensions and healthcare play a major role, the European Commission and European Central Bank have also flagged costs related to ageing as a key risk to debt sustainability.Japan is one major economy where financing costs remain low even as its debt exceeds 260% of GDP and it has one of the world’s oldest populations. But that reflects high domestic ownership of government debt and ultra loose monetary policy – a hard act to follow with higher inflation.On the environmental front, a study last week showed a failure to curb carbon emissions will raise debt-servicing costs for 59 nations within the next decade.”These long-term risks may not possess a well-established historical precedent, making reliance solely on historical data for risk assessment a challenge,” said Gael Fichan, head of fixed income at Swiss private bank Syz Group.For now, despite the steepest increases in borrowing costs in decades, investors still see little risk in holding governments’ longer-term debt.For example, the New York Fed estimates longer-term U.S. Treasuries still yield less than rolling over short-term debt – a legacy of central bank government bond buying.However, as central banks now roll off that debt and government financing needs rise, that should reverse, investors say. A recent rise in long-dated bond yields in reaction to a surge in U.S. borrowing needs was a case in point.”As the supply of long-dated Treasuries rises, investors may demand higher term premia to compensate for the added risk of holding bonds with longer maturities,” Fichan said.Kraemer, the former S&P official, said it was “unreasonable” that shorter and longer-term government debt were rated the same.POLICY WATCHGreater focus on longer-term risks should bring scrutiny of government policies.Policy “is going to matter more especially in terms of the fiscal side of things about how the governments are reacting to the various promises to the electorate and what they’re trying to achieve,” said Kshitij Sinha, a fund manager at Canada Life Asset Management.It will be crucial whether governments can bring down relative debt levels by boosting economic growth, and here climate change is both a challenge and opportunity.”The green transition will require quite some investments… that will also increase the overall debt levels further, but down the road… you will profit from it,” said Martin Lenz, senior portfolio manager at Union Investment, which manages 424 billion euros.Still, with higher debt an economic reality, few governments are left with the coveted AAA rating.”Can there be a world without AAA sovereigns? Yeah, I think there can be, We’ve seen this happening in the corporate space, for example,” LBBW’s Kraemer said, adding that out of dozens of AAA-rated U.S. companies in 1980s now there were only two left.($1 = 0.7854 pounds) More

  • in

    How the middle-class consumer is adapting to rising living costs

    Alan Plampton, a retired accountant from Cromarty in Scotland, has been monitoring rising food prices more closely over the past year. But he refuses to skimp. “We want to have a quality product where possible at the best value,” says the 70-year-old, who lives with his wife. “But . . . there’s no point in paying a cheaper price if it’s rubbish or it doesn’t last as long.” For Joe and Hannah, who are 30 years younger, the impact of the UK’s cost of living crisis is more acute even though they, like Plampton, describe themselves as middle class.“I feel like the elasticity that we have with shopping has reached the maximum point,” says Joe, who is a transport planner in London. “I think we’ve cut back on everything we could.” Impromptu trips to Tesco Express convenience stores to buy ingredients for a single meal, or to more upmarket Waitrose for a small shop are no longer the norm, adds Hannah, a teacher. “We’ve absolutely become more price sensitive and price conscious,” says Joe. The couple, who have a four-year-old son, asked the Financial Times not to use their surname.Impromptu trips to upmarket stores such as Waitrose for a small shop are no longer the norm as shoppers become more price conscious © BloombergA long squeeze on incomes in the UK has intensified since the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine pushed up the price of many goods. It is changing how Britain’s middle-class consumers, whose power and influence grew in the second half of the 20th century as wages, home ownership and access to credit all expanded, view their financial situations.The squeeze is about to get more acute after the Bank of England raised interest rates 14 times in 21 months to try to get inflation under control, sending mortgage rates to their highest levels since February 2008. The size and speed of the increases are causing angst in the 1.4mn British households expected to roll off fixed-rate mortgage deals this year alone, and exacerbating a split between older and younger consumers in similar socio-economic brackets.“Suddenly those middle-class households that were otherwise protected, or at least more protected from price rises, are now in a situation where their main expenditure item is about to rocket,” says Rich Shepherd, a senior analyst at market research group Mintel. Food and apparel retailers, restaurants and airlines could soon find that the financial wriggle room of some better-off consumers is shrinking as they prioritise financial resilience over spending. A key question for such companies will be whether these changes are a temporary response to new circumstances, or a more permanent shift in consumer behaviour.“Brands just need to understand the mechanics of where finances are and how that has impacted [consumers’] mindset,” adds Shepherd. “Mindset is really the key thing.” The long expansionIn the late 1950s, the National Readership Survey devised a socio-economic grading system based on the occupation of the chief earner to segment households. In that system, “middle class” is generally defined as A and B consumers — people in higher and intermediate managerial roles in administrative and professional occupations. The NRS system is still widely used, although income — the UK median disposable household income in 2022 was just under £33,000 — is also used as a proxy.After two decades during which incomes grew, home ownership rose and access to credit widened, by the early 2000s it was routine for households to have credit from multiple lenders, amplifying their spending power. The growth of Asian manufacturing meant the prices of many goods fell in real terms. Households spent proportionately less on essentials and had more money to devote to indulgences. The combination of rising financial firepower, more choice and more affordable products meant retail sales grew steadily for years. Retailers with an established high street presence, such as Next, Marks and Spencer and John Lewis, responded by opening more stores, cementing their dominance. But the onset of the global financial crisis of 2008/9, when a year-long recession was followed by a long period of very low interest rates and anaemic wage growth, helped drive a sea change in consumer behaviour.“What the recession brought was the acceptance of Primark, Aldi, Lidl, B&M, and [the idea of] shopping across ranges,” says Lisa Hooker, leader of industry for consumer at PwC. Previously, she adds, a lot of the value end of the market “was seen as a compromise on quality and I think over the years, coupled with the recession, the value-end improved their quality”. Nowhere was this more obvious than at the two German discounters Aldi and Lidl. Their first UK stores had opened in the 1990s, selling around 800 basic products from spartan stores at a fraction of the price of traditional supermarkets. By the time the crisis struck, they had inched up to a combined 5 per cent market share.In the late 1950s, the National Readership Survey devised a socio-economic grading system based on the occupation of the chief earner to segment households © Charles Hewitt/Picture Post/Hulton Archive/Getty ImagesBut a so-called claret offensive involving the introduction of top-of-the-range wines, lobsters for £5, luxury ranges and British produce put them on the radar of more discerning buyers. They responded by opening hundreds more stores, often in smarter locations. “The real revelation for Aldi and Lidl was a change in their real estate strategy, which started around the 2000s,” says one former supermarket executive. “They recognised that they needed to be in good retail locations with car parks. There was a natural shift to presenting themselves to a more middle-class customer by virtue of their location strategy.”The years after the financial crisis also saw the rise of the smartphone, which helped turbocharge online shopping and brought new competition for middle-class spending.German discounters Aldi and Lidl benefited from the global financial crisis of 2008/9 © Tolga Akmen/AFP/Getty ImagesThe result was a new era of savvier shopping during which customer loyalty went out of the window. James Bailey, executive director at Waitrose, points out that the number of retail brands that shoppers buy from in a month “has been gradually creeping up” for more than a decade. “Before that, most people would spend most of their money doing one big shop.” As a result of that change, along with the proliferation of alternative sales channels, he says “there isn’t really such a thing as ‘a Waitrose shopper’ — it’s a surprising spread of customers, with a slight bias towards more affluent, older customers”.That reflects wider divisions within the consumer group. “You’ve got quite an interesting split, not just in terms of socio-economic groups but also age groups,” says Philip Shaw, chief economist at Investec, who adds that well-off retirees represent “quite a more potent consumer group”. They and the highest earners have the healthiest finances while younger people still living at home have more disposable incomes, said PwC in a recent survey.The middle-aged consumer, typically between 35 to 54, often with children and mortgages, remains under the greatest financial pressure. The years that followed the financial crash were also defined by a move from buying things to doing things, prompting one executive at Swedish furniture retailer Ikea to proclaim the world had “hit peak stuff”.Low-cost airlines expanded their networks and restaurant chains, fuelled by private equity investment and cheap borrowing, opened hundreds of new outlets. The Covid-19 lockdowns that started in 2020 and continued intermittently through 2021, brought the experience economy to a halt and boosted retailers such as Currys and DIY chain B&Q, as people stuck at home splashed the cash on gadgets and home renovations. But the long-term trend appears to be reasserting itself in the aftermath of the pandemic, despite surging prices for everything from package holidays to festival tickets and the uncertainty about mortgage rates. Shepherd says this is because middle-class consumers who are used to spending more on themselves and more on experiences “still want and need those everyday indulgences” even when times are tight. “It can’t just be doom and gloom.”Monthly figures from Barclaycard, which processes about half of Britain’s credit and debit card transactions, have shown consistent growth in spending on entertainment and travel, with airlines and travel agents particular beneficiaries.When the party endsShaw at Investec believes government financial support helped support household finances. The Covid-era furlough scheme blunted the impact of lockdowns on incomes and unemployment, while the lengthy closures of non-essential retail and hospitality restricted spending, leading to a pile-up of savings that are now being run down.“No one knows how big that pile is . . . but our estimates suggest it might have been up to about £180bn at the peak and we now think that more than halved to around £75bn,” he says. “It’s extremely likely that it’s better-off households that have bigger cash piles even proportionately to income.”State relief from sharply rising energy costs has also helped. But there will be much less protection from rising mortgage rates. “I do think we are going to see headwinds intensify and the intensity of cutbacks will be focused more on middle and high-income households because of what’s happening with mortgage rates,” says Richard Lim, chief executive of Retail Economics. Survey evidence already points to this. Roughly two-thirds of middle-class households are finding it harder to save and would prioritise putting money aside if their financial situation improved significantly, according to Mintel. “This cautiousness is perhaps something that you would expect to see lower down the income scales, lower down the socio-economic scales,” says Shepherd. Joe, one half of the London couple, says “we’re going to have to look at utilities and mortgage payments again” if inflation does not ease. “It would be another chapter and I would hope we don’t have to get to that point.”The proportion of more affluent shoppers saying they had moved to cheaper options at supermarkets has risen from 28 per cent in April 2022 to 40 per cent a year later, according to the Institute of Grocery Distribution. Those who said they were prepared to eat perceived lower quality food has risen from 16 per cent to 23 per cent. For the middle-class consumer, factors such as quality or provenance can rank higher than price in purchasing decisions © Hollie Adams/BloombergSupermarkets report more interest in their premium ready meal ranges as consumers think twice about eating out — spending in restaurants has fallen for the past five months in a row, according to Barclaycard data. “I’m not prepared to go to PizzaExpress and spend £100 on a meal, when I can go to M&S and buy a pizza deal for £12 with two sides and a nice bottle of wine,” says Catherine Shuttleworth, who runs digital marketing agency Savvy. Its research found that AB consumers were also ordering fewer takeaway meals, searching out coupons and vouchers and doing more cooking from scratch in response to budget pressure.Demand for some big-ticket retail items has started to soften; sofa retailer DFS warned last month that the market has been “significantly worse than expected”, while the boss of bike and car parts seller Halfords said in an interview that customers were spending more time “thinking carefully about big ticket discretionary spend”. But Lim points out that a hard core of determined spenders remains. “What we’re seeing is a polarisation in the market. There’s about 15 per cent of consumers that say that they are undeterred in their spending. These are consumers that are basically ‘keep calm, carry on; the cost of living crisis doesn’t really impact me’.” They may live in one of almost a third of UK homes that are now owned outright, they may be protected from rising rates by a fixed-rate mortgage for a few years to come, or they may have benefited from wage growth that hit a record high of 7.3 per cent this year and has been skewed towards higher earners.“They are the most affluent consumers and they spend disproportionately,” adds Lim, pointing out that the top 20 per cent of UK householders are responsible for 40 per cent of consumer spending. Such resilience is why the middle-class consumer still matters so much to retailers, restaurateurs and hoteliers alike. His or her spending power extends beyond basic needs, and factors such as quality or provenance can rank higher than price when purchasing goods.“The supermarkets are going to be fighting to keep their middle-class shoppers on the basis that when things get better again, they are the ones that will trade up and will spend more,” says Shuttleworth. Retailers had been deploying various tactics to hold on to fickle middle-class shoppers even before the cost of living crisis, from revamped loyalty schemes and price-matching campaigns to new lower-cost ranges. 

    Even while many shoppers focus on finding the lowest prices, retailers will have to continue innovating in anticipation of better times ahead, says Rich Shepherd at Mintel © Mike Kemp/In Pictures/Getty Images

    Ocado, the online supermarket known for selling Navarrico jarred chickpeas and rose harissa paste to middle England, has refined its marketing efforts to retain existing shoppers and attract new ones. Chief executive Tim Steiner said last month he does not want “the wrong customers” who respond to promotions but cannot be converted into regular shoppers. “You throw a bigger voucher at it, you acquire 20,000 customers that week, but the problem is, they don’t stick with you,” he says. The quid pro quo is that middle-class consumers are demanding. Manfred Abraham, chief executive of Yonder Consulting, says they expect companies to stick to their values irrespective of what is happening to their own operating costs. Cutting back on sustainability or customer service is likely to put them off.Bailey agrees, saying that while value has become more important “for obvious reasons”, Waitrose customers still care most about quality, service and ethics. “[They] don’t want cheaper cuts of meat that come from abroad. They want British beef, they want the sourcing and credentials we give them, but for certain meal occasions they do want us to offer them an alternative to eating out and they do want the option to put ‘essentials’ mince in a bolognese,” he adds, referring to the firm’s entry-level product range.Even while many consumers focus on finding the lowest prices, brands will have to continue innovating in anticipation of better times ahead, says Shepherd at Mintel. He points out that previous downturns have included “a period where people have to bunker down a little bit and focus on functionality and price”.“But when they get out of that period they want to get out, get new products and try new things.” More

  • in

    The US now accepts national and economic security can’t be separated

    Tech decoupling between the US and China is about many things, but chief among them is the notion that western technology should not feed Chinese military modernisation and expansion. From an American standpoint, this seems pretty obvious. Why should US money, products and expertise aid the military strength of its chief strategic adversary?That’s the rationale for last week’s new executive order from the White House limiting US investment into China in areas of technology that pose the most acute national security risks, like semiconductors, quantum computing and artificial intelligence. The idea is to expand on existing export bans to China, as well as limits on Chinese acquisition of US technology, by also restricting how US investors put capital into the most strategic sectors in China.The new rule is actually much more about expertise than money. “It’s not capital that’s in short supply,” deputy national security adviser Mike Pyle told me. “It’s capital plus the access to experts and additional assistance.” Translation: this isn’t about curbing passive investment into China via, say, public securities or exchange traded funds, so much as it is about preventing top US venture capitalists and private equity funds from transferring important western-made intangible assets — patents, data, software and other kinds of IP — along with their investments.Strategic investments from the US to China have already been curtailed significantly in the last couple of years. US dollar funding for China-focused venture capital and private equity funds fell to $14bn in 2022 from $95bn in 2021. The new executive order will undoubtedly push those flows lower.The proposal is designed to continue the administration’s “small yard, high fence” approach to limiting tech decoupling to the most crucial areas of national security. The question is how to draw a line about what general purpose technologies like artificial intelligence might actually be used for: an algorithmic takedown of the dollar-based financial system, for example, or a machine-generated song that mimics the voices of the latest hot K-pop band. “We think this is a hard problem,” admits Pyle.The administration has already taken consultations with hundreds of stakeholders about how small the yard and high the fence will be, including industry, foreign allies and other partners. There will be more to come as the White House takes formal comments on the proposal over the next few months. But it’s telling that the Business Roundtable welcomed the administration’s approach, which tells me that the executive order is already seen as being less tough on the tech industry — and industry in general — than some on either side of the political aisle had hoped.Where to draw lines about dual-use technologies isn’t the only hard problem. The White House has tried to keep defence-related technology transfer between the two countries separate from a broader discussion about US industrial policy. This discussion covers how to bolster the availability of critical mineral supplies and key pharmaceutical inputs monopolised by China. It looks at how to increase the location and supply of semiconductor manufacturing globally. But China’s communist rulers do not make the same distinctions. The free market is always in service to the state, not the other way around. This poses a fundamental challenge for the White House. Security hawks could do the best possible job of ringfencing dual-use technology behind a very high wall, and the US would still face critical national security vulnerabilities in areas like pharmaceuticals and biotech, green batteries, shipbuilding and many other areas. Securing those will require a much broader approach to tracking global supply chains, and understanding where chokepoints — be they controlled by states or corporations — lie.Thinking in broad economic terms about how to achieve national security isn’t something that the US has done for quite a while (trade as a tool of modern industrial policy died after Ronald Reagan’s time). The Biden administration has made it clear that we’ve moved beyond a market-knows-best philosophy and need some government intervention to ensure the strength of our industrial base, labour force and defence preparedness. But there’s not yet a joined-up plan about how to get there.It’s a topic that is likely to come to the fore in autumn as Congress returns to work and decides whether to broaden the restrictions in the executive order. The current Senate proposal for outbound investment has some provisions that are weaker than the White House’s measure, but it would also require passive portfolio investors, joint venture and research projects to report activities in China. Meanwhile, there are politicians on both sides of the aisle, from Republicans like Senator Marco Rubio to Democrats like Representative Rosa DeLauro, who want to see trade and capital flows in a broader range of sectors under more scrutiny.There are plenty of people who will say moves like the new executive order “escalate” conflict with Beijing. I’d argue they merely draw attention to uncomfortable truths that have in fact always been there in plain sight. For years, the west thought security and market concerns were separate. But for China, national security and economic security are the same thing. The decoupling story is far from [email protected] More

  • in

    An ETF will bring a revolution for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies

    And it’s not just talk. The potential of these investment vehicles is already being realized in markets like Canada. The Purpose Bitcoin ETF, for example, raked in over $400 million in assets under management within just two days of its launch. It’s no longer a question of whether crypto is an asset class.Continue Reading on Coin Telegraph More