More stories

  • in

    Move over, DM and EM. Here come GI, BM, SCH, SBS, NRW and SC

    What do China, Poland, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have in common? That’s not a joke, it’s a serious consideration for anyone who has money tracking MSCI’s Emerging Markets Index.Investment market taxonomies like developed, emerging and frontier are stupid by design. Risk and reward is lopsided whenever the category is too narrow — the R in Brics has given Jim O’Neill’s remaining followers a tricky couple of years, for example — whereas a broad selection guarantees mediocrity. And while guaranteed mediocrity gives fund managers an easy benchmark to (fail to) beat, it’s clumsy to the point of uselessness when trying to express a view.Here’s a fun report from Actis, an emerging markets-focused infrastructure investor, that proposes a better way. Our “relentless march in liquid markets towards indexation” has “obliterated incentives to differentiate,” write Actis Macro Forum editor-in-chief Ewen Cameron Watt and investment principal Joonas Taras. “Homogeneity has suffocated opportunity, with a handful of countries representing over 80 per cent of most indices”. Broad labels have also encouraged casual stereotyping:Across 80-plus countries, wide differences of opportunity are obvious. Yet common and lazy investment and media shorthand ignores this point. The weakest countries frequently dominate the dialogue. The case of Sri Lanka — a wonderful country with woeful macroeconomics — overwhelms the attractions of India just to the north in the mantra that EM is too risky, too corrupt and unable to deliver returns.Here’s what they suggest instead:The Global Influencers — the US, China and Japan — are important to trade, so are price fixers and the suppliers rather than receivers of investment. These are the nations that “will continue to drive risks, rather than be dictated to.”Big Middles — Brazil, India, Mexico, etc — are big and stable G20 countries with significant foreign reserves and domestic savings institutions. Big Middles “are natural destinations [for investment] provided inappropriate policy does not dilute investment opportunity.” (Mainstream Europe and the UK would probably be included in the category; their absence is because they’re not within the Actis investment universe.)Supply Chain Heroes — Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, etc — are places that attract significant foreign direct investment beyond natural resources, but have volatile currencies and funky monetary policies so can’t entirely be trusted. Some will succeed long-term but generally, their attractiveness will wax and wane with the global economic cycle.Stable But Small — Bulgaria, Romania, Uruguay, etc — are like Big Middles but are just too wee to be price and policy setters. What matters most is what’s going on with their neighbours. Natural Resource Winners — Chile, Colombia, South Africa, etc — is the self-explanatory basket of commodities-reliant economies. Energy transition makes them long-term works in progress. Structurally Challenged — Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, etc — are places where “financial and/or macroeconomic volatility seem to be a way of life”. Turkey is in this category because of its unorthodox leadership, even though it’s problems with tax collection and debt repayments are atypical to the group. There be dragons, basically.The idea here is not replace DM and EM in the investment lexicon. Neither is it to tell you which places are best to invest. It’s just a clearer lens through which to look at the world. “This is not a framework for rejection or selection, rather a series of working titles to allow effective investment and portfolio management,” Actis says. “[U]nderstanding and differentiating the risks being taken and pricing thereof is vital. That above all is the point of this exercise.”The full report’s available for download here.Further reading:Investors should be cautious of simplistic indices (FT) More

  • in

    Powell reaffirms hawkish stance, says more rate rises likely

    Powell didn’t rule out a rate hike at the upcoming meeting at the end of July. The pause in June bought some time for the Fed to asset the monetary conditions before the July meeting.”The only thing we decided was not to raise rates at the June meeting,” Powell said.”I wouldn’t take, you know, moving at consecutive meetings off the table at all,” he added before also saying that “the committee clearly believes that there’s more work to do, that there are more rate hikes that are likely to be appropriate.”Powell also said that inflation going back to the Fed’s target of 2% will likely happen not before 2025.The Federal Open Market Committee meeting is scheduled for July 25-26. More

  • in

    Brazil may tweak inflation target time frame in CMN meeting

    BRASILIA (Reuters) – Brazil’s National Monetary Council (CMN), the country’s top economic policy body, will meet on Thursday to set its 2026 inflation target, with all eyes on whether it will tweak the time frame now used to assess the goal’s fulfillment.Currently, the CMN sets annual inflation targets that must be met each calendar year. However, Finance Minister Fernando Haddad has said he favors pursuing inflation targets within a “continuous” time frame, arguing a longer-term approach provides more room to accommodate price shocks without requiring monetary tightening.The CMN comprises the finance minister, planning minister and the central bank governor, giving the federal government two out of three votes on one of thorniest economic policy debates in Latin America’s largest nation. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has often criticized the independent central bank for keeping interest rates at 13.75% despite a steep decline in inflation. He has also called for higher inflation targets to enable monetary policy easing. Those appeals, which he has not made for a few months, had served to worsen expectations for inflation.Although the CMN is expected to maintain a 2026 inflation target of 3%, there is a growing belief it may ditch annual targets in favor of the longer-term models favored by Haddad. The central bank currently targets inflation of 3.25% in 2023 and 3% in 2024 and 2025, with a tolerance margin of 1.5 percentage points up or down.This compares with inflation of 3.4% in the 12 months through mid-June and private economists’ expectations of inflation reaching 5.06% this year, 3.98% in 2024, 3.80% in 2025, and 3.72% in 2026. In the minutes from its latest policy decision, the central bank said that most policymakers see room for cautious monetary easing in August if an improved scenario for inflation materializes, signaling that maintaining the inflation target at 3% for the coming years would be important for this purpose. More

  • in

    Binance Dropped by Paysafe for Euro Deposits and Withdrawals

    Paysafe will no longer support bank transfers of euros to and from Binance via the Single Euro Payments Area network from Sept. 25, according to a spokesperson for the world’s largest crypto exchange. “Following a strategic review, we have taken the decision to cease offering our embedded wallet solution to Binance across the region,” London-based Paysafe said in an emailed statement. “Paysafe and Binance are now working to mutually implement an orderly and fair process to terminate this service over the next few months.”Binance was already under pressure in Europe, where Belgian authorities this month ordered it to stop local operations and French prosecutors are investigating it for aggravated money laundering. Its share of euro-denominated crypto trading has tumbled to 13% this year, research firm Kaiko said June 20. Underscoring the impact from losing access to payment networks, overall pound-denominated trading volume across exchanges has fallen since Paysafe in mid-March said it would stop providing support to Binance for withdrawals and deposits in the UK, data from Kaiko show. At the time, Paysafe said it would continue to support Binance in Europe and Latin America. Paysafe’s decision to cut Binance off in the UK took full effect in May. Binance “will be changing the provider,” the spokesperson said in a statement late Wednesday in New York, adding that “all methods of depositing and withdrawing other fiat currencies as well as buying and selling crypto on Binance.com remain unaffected.”Binance faces a web of probes around the world and has been dropped by some payments providers wary of regulatory fallout. Its Australia platform was cut off from a key local currency withdrawal route at the start of June.The US Securities & Exchange Commission earlier this month accused Binance and its founder Changpeng ‘CZ’ Zhao of mishandling customer funds, misleading investors and regulators, and breaking securities rules. Binance has called the SEC action “disappointing” and said that it intends to defend its platform “vigorously.” Zhao and Binance also face a lawsuit from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. In the wake of the SEC’s action, Binance.US told users that payment and banking partners had signaled an intent to pause support for the exchange’s dollar channels. Its US market share has almost evaporated, Kaiko said earlier.BNB, the native token of Binance, advanced 1.8% to $225 as of 9:22 a.m. in London on Thursday, part of a broader rise in digital assets. It’s slumped about 30% this quarter, buffeted by the SEC’s lawsuit.(Updates with comment from Paysafe in third paragraph.)©2023 Bloomberg L.P. More

  • in

    How the US and Europe can beat China’s Belt and Road

    One of the pithier remarks about America’s geopolitical rivalry with China came recently from Larry Summers, who served in Barack Obama and Bill Clinton’s administrations in a different, more optimistic era of globalisation. He quoted a developing country figure thus: “When we’re engaged with the Chinese, we get an airport. And when we’re engaged with you guys, we get a lecture.”With developing countries’ borrowing costs rising but massive green infrastructure spending needed, the US and the EU are trying hard to match Beijing’s offer of investment. Washington merged federal agencies to create the International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) in 2018, and at the G7 rich nations meeting in 2021 President Joe Biden launched a Build Back Better World initiative, repackaged the next year as the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII). The EU in 2021 launched its Global Gateway, which aims to leverage up a relatively modest amount of public money to fund €300bn of investment in connectivity projects over six years.As rivals to China, the rich countries’ problem is not just financial firepower but Beijing’s increasing tendency to politicise its investment and link it to security alliances. But that challenge is also an opportunity. The flaws in China’s decades-long campaign of recycling its surpluses into state-directed investments abroad on secretive and arbitrary terms are becoming evident, as is Beijing’s record of picking allies and clients — such as Russia and Pakistan. Many developing countries are, commendably, declining to be bullied or bribed into taking sides. Europe and the US would do better to offer assistance and trade on fair and open terms.The problems with China’s overseas lending and investment drive, formalised into the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013, have become more salient. Loans have gone sour, embroiling China in messy debt restructurings in Zambia and Sri Lanka. Many countries are increasingly disillusioned with the BRI. Some, particularly in Europe, have disengaged from China’s investment initiatives, disappointed in the meagre returns.Some of China’s geopolitical entanglements also look like bad bets. By allying with Russia, Beijing may be able to secure cheap oil. But closer political alignment with Moscow taints it with the weakness of Vladimir Putin’s regime. Pakistan has long been a Chinese ally, but with an IMF lending programme stalled, continued support from Beijing without backing from elsewhere risks shackling China to an endlessly dependent money sink.Some Asia-Pacific countries are sufficiently concerned about Chinese aggression to push them towards security alliances such as the Quad, which brings India together with the US, Australia and Japan. The EU, of course, lacks a centralised military capacity and developed security dimension. What it and the US do have to offer regarding aid and investment should be based on rules and openness.The PGII and the Global Gateway are works in progress — fine in principle but with a degree of scepticism required. The US and EU both have a habit of failing to force their disparate official agencies to operate effectively together (as does China, to be fair) and of making wildly unrealistic estimates of the amounts of private capital that can be catalysed by modest public investment.Alongside their bilateral efforts, Europe and the US need to make a determined effort to expand and depoliticise their traditional channels of assistance, the IMF and the World Bank, where they hold around half the voting power on the institutions’ executive boards.William Ruto, Kenya’s president, criticised the fund and bank at a development finance conference last week in Paris and said low-income countries’ environmental transitions should be financed by a new, more neutral, “green bank”. A lot more money for the existing institutions and an openness to reform — assuming emerging market countries actually want to take more responsibility — will be needed to overcome this suspicion.The other area in which the US and EU ought to be able to outbid China is access to their markets. The US economy remains a powerful magnet, notwithstanding its mulish refusal to sign new preferential trade agreements. Exports from non-China East Asian economies to the US have shot up in recent years despite the US pulling out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and America overtook China as South Korea’s main export destination in 2022 for the first time in nearly two decades. As for the EU, finalising the signed but as yet unratified deal with South America’s Mercosur trade bloc would be an important signal to a region that is only projected to receive a few billion in Global Gateway financing.China envy is a natural sentiment for US and European policymakers. Having lots of levers to pull and arbitrary cash to disperse is always more fun than setting rules and running multilateral systems. But democracies without persistent surpluses to recycle will tend to be at a loss at that game compared with autocracies that do. When it comes to investment and trade, the rich world’s comparative advantages are openness and consistency. They should pursue [email protected] More

  • in

    The Chinese carmakers planning to shake up the European market

    Visitors to the Nio House in Frankfurt can do more than just admire the sleek new electric vehicles on display. Half the showroom, a stone’s throw from the city’s 15th-century Eschenheimer Gate, is a free-to-use co-working space, equipped with meeting rooms, a café and a crèche.When Qin Lihong, co-founder and president of the Chinese carmaker, attended its opening in late March, he told the freshly hired sales team not to bother with sales targets and to instead “give to the community”. The charm offensive is a prelude to an aggressive export drive by the Hefei-based company and other Chinese carmakers that threatens to reshape Europe’s automotive landscape, dethroning its powerful incumbents and forcing governments to choose between protecting their industries and embracing competition and consumer choice.“We want to be in the top three” brands in the region by the end of the decade and number one “if we can”, says Michael Shu, European chief of leading Chinese automaker BYD. The company, backed by US investor Warren Buffett, has been name-checked by former Volkswagen chief executive Herbert Diess as the carmaker that the German juggernaut should fear the most.Over the past quarter-century China’s automakers have become experts in electric vehicles, while the country dominates the production of almost every resource, material and component used to make them.

    You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

    With their home market largely conquered — China buys proportionately more electric vehicles than any other country — companies such as Nio, BYD, Li Auto, Xpeng and Great Wall have turned their eyes abroad.So far, China has tapped western markets largely by buying existing brands; Geely owns Swedish carmaker Volvo, while SAIC owns MG in the UK. Now, they intend to bring their own brands to Europe in rapidly increasing numbers and some intend to build their own factories there, as the Japanese did in the 1980s and 1990s.If the past decades have been a story of patience, as Chinese manufacturers mastered electric vehicle and battery technology, the coming one will be coloured by ambition. By 2035 cars with petrol and diesel engines will no longer be sold in Europe — one of the most drastic curbs on vehicle emissions anywhere in the world — and the Chinese sense a huge opportunity.iCAR GTCheryFounded: 1997Status: State-ownedBased in: Wuhu, AnhuiAnnual NEV output: 221,000Chery, currently China’s biggest exporter of cars, plans to sell up to 15,000 vehicles next year in the UK alone, a level that would see it overtake Jeep, Jaguar and Suzuki from a standing start. The group, based west of Shanghai in Anhui province, began working on electric vehicles in 2000. It has taken a quarter of a century for the company to push the button on a European offensive that will also include some petrol-engined vehicles.“Our product level years ago was not fully ready, but gradually, after so many years, it has increased”, says Victor Zhang, manager of the Chery group in the UK. “Now, we are fully ready.” China’s ‘new energy vehicles’So far, development of EVs in the west has been dominated by Tesla, a business built by a small cadre of driven entrepreneurs and spearheaded by their obsessive leader, Elon Musk. But the rise of the sector in China was a matter of state industrial policy. Lars Pauly, who spent three decades at Mercedes-Benz but now oversees German imports of BYD cars, says Chinese carmakers would not have been able to take on incumbents in combustion engines “where the European manufacturers have achieved a very high level of expertise”. But with battery technology “the race has started again”, he adds, and the Chinese “have probably taken it more seriously”.Beijing realised that electric vehicles could help reduce China’s heavy dependence on oil imports that come through the disputed waters of the South China Sea. The demise of the internal combustion engine also offered a way to reduce the country’s worsening air pollution, which was becoming a focus of domestic criticism. The fact that EVs now also dovetail with China’s climate change goals is a happy bonus. The state’s backing has deepened further since Xi Jinping, with his focus on energy and technological self-sufficiency, came to power in 2012. From 2009 to 2017 cumulative state spending on the EV sector in China totalled close to $60bn, according to estimates from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The think-tank says it then rose by a further $66bn from 2018 to 2021.

    You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

    Despite those state-led beginnings, many of the rising Chinese EV makers have the functional advantages of start-ups, with agility and no cumbersome legacy operations to sustain. Tony Wu, a partner at Northern Light Venture Capital (NLVC), a China-focused VC firm with $4.5bn assets under management, says the organisational structures of EV start-ups was a key advantage. “From day one, all the departments work together and become a part of a big story . . . The [carmaking] process is a whole, just like internet companies developing products. The walls between different departments have been knocked down. All the departments work at the same place. This is where established carmakers find it difficult.”China has emerged as the world’s largest market for cars, with its homegrown roster of brands such as BYD driving innovation both in battery technology and features related to the internet-connected car — and the European and international brands are slipping behind.The country’s technological progress has already been “much faster than we expected”, according to Makoto Uchida, chief executive of Japanese carmaker Nissan.Nio ET5NioFounded: 2014Status: Listed in New YorkBased in: Hefei, AnhuiAnnual NEV output: 122,500Employees: 27,000While the domestic market for “new energy vehicles” — a sector that includes both plug-in hybrids and pure electric cars — has boomed in the past three years, the pace of growth is starting to stabilise. This trend, coupled with scores of companies vying for market share, has sparked warnings from analysts that utilisation rates at factories have fallen to around a third. With so much capacity sitting idle, the obvious solution is to export. China overtook Germany as the second-biggest car exporter last year and is tracking to take the top spot from Japan this year. Beachheads in EuropeThe European brands that spent fortunes breaking into the Chinese market have fallen down the sales rankings there when it comes to EVs. In the first five months of the year, BYD alone sold nearly 1mn of its battery and plug-in hybrid vehicles in China, accounting for 38 per cent of the country’s new energy vehicle market, according to data from Automobility, a Shanghai consultancy. By contrast, Volkswagen, one of the first European companies to enter the Chinese market in the late 1980s, had just 2 per cent of EV sales.Berlin-based auto analyst Matthias Schmidt believes that the Chinese carmakers entering Europe have a window between now and 2025, when the region’s incumbent car industry is expected to ramp up production of electric vehicles to coincide with upcoming EU rules on emissions.“Europe is risking history repeating itself,” Schmidt says, pointing to Tesla’s surprise takeover of the electric segment a few years ago. The continent’s carmakers once confidently said there would be no demand for Musk’s quirky and expensive cars — which today account for one in five electric vehicles sold in Europe.According to KPMG, Chinese groups could snatch a 15 per cent market share of new car sales in Europe — larger than France’s Renault — within the next two years. Already, Chinese companies are establishing a presence. Chery expects to open 50 showrooms in the UK alone next year, doubling by 2025.

    You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

    In Germany, Europe’s automotive heartland, the notion that local roads might in a few years be flush with Chinese cars first became tangible last October, when BYD announced it had entered a partnership with Sixt. By 2028, Germany’s largest car rental company has agreed to buy 100,000 BYD vehicles for its European operations, focusing initially on the Atto 3, a compact sport utility vehicle. So far, the sales push has been modest. Out of the nearly 870,000 new cars that have so far been registered in Germany this year, 111 were BYD models. Nio sold 161 cars in the country. Pauly says the number of registrations in Germany do not reflect BYD’s order intake in the country, which is “fortunately higher”, but for Schmidt “the figures are very disappointing”.Chinese firms are prepared to play the long game. “The car industry was born in Europe, and Germany and France still have very strong local brands,” BYD’s Shu told the FT. “We are number one in China but it took us almost 20 years.” BYD SealBYDFounded: 1995Status: Listed in Hong KongBased in: Shenzhen, GuangdongAnnual NEV output: 1.86mnEmployees: 230,000Chery’s Zhang acknowledges that Europe is a market with “very strict regulation and intensive competition”. Most brands coming to Europe are only launching a small proportion of their offering, he adds, as safety standards and associated compliance costs are too high.Chinese carmakers have also signalled that they are preparing to start manufacturing cars in Europe, which would help them avoid import tariffs and reduce shipping costs as well as potentially appear more localised for consumers. “We need to understand the needs of the European customers better,” Geely holding chief executive Daniel Li told the FT’s Future of the Car Summit last month. “We understand we still lack experience, we need to watch the market demand, and customer requirements carefully,” he said.The European fightbackEven compared with previous influxes from Japanese and later Korean brands, the looming wave of Chinese electric vehicles into Europe has put the continent’s carmakers on edge. Governments too are wary of yet another industry slipping away to Asia’s largest economy while the threat to domestic jobs will test national pride and possibly even stoke xenophobia. European carmakers’ initial response has been to lobby hard against upcoming “Euro 7” rules on combustion engine emissions, due to take effect later this decade. Renault chief executive Luca de Meo says the change “is going to cost me more than €1bn in development . . . and the marginal effect of this on consumption is tiny”. He argues it will drain “people and money from electric cars” at a crucial time and “give the Chinese a foot in the door”.But some European auto chiefs say fears of an epochal threat from Chinese imports are overblown. “We have to be analytical,” says one very senior executive at a major European auto group. “Yes, they [the Chinese] will take some market share, they will play a major role. But we have the design for European customers, the network and the fleets. So I’m not relaxed, but it’s far from being an existential moment.”Others are quietly hoping that consumer wariness of Chinese technology will help slow adoption, though the experience of smartphones suggests otherwise. Fears over Huawei’s links to Beijing and China’s military, which led the UK government to order the removal of its kit from the country’s 5G network infrastructure, have done little to deter consumers from buying its cut-price handsets.WEY Coffee 02Great WallFounded: 1984Status: Listed in Hong Kong and ShanghaiBased in: Baoding, HebeiAnnual NEV output: 132,000Employees: 59,000The pricing strategy of Chinese brands has also raised eyebrows. There had been fears of cheap Chinese models flooding the European market, using lower wages at home to undercut carmakers burdened with higher local labour costs and beholden to powerful unions. But BYD has priced its models at exactly the level of VW’s ID. 2, which is scheduled to go on sale in 2025.Some believe this strategy is just to allow Chinese brands to establish themselves. “By the time VW will have brought the ID. 2 to market, the Chinese should be on a similar playing field,” says Schmidt. “From that point onwards we should see the Chinese be able to undercut the Europeans.”Others think that it is a deliberate move, inviting consumers to compare cars on technology and innovation rather than cost. That could come as a shock to those expecting Chinese cars to be basic and poorly assembled.In China, Zhu Yi, a 30-year-old tech blogger, is emblematic of the new generation of car buyers whose purchasing decisions are based as much around processing power as horsepower. Last year Zhu, who lives in the north-eastern city of Dalian, bought a BYD Song plug-in hybrid vehicle for Rmb163,800 ($23,000) after test driving vehicles made by Chinese groups Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto, as well as a Tesla and Volkswagen’s ID electric vehicle brand.“I found [the VW’s] power performance and control system so bad. It hadn’t gotten rid of the traditional control system,” he says, adding that after purchasing the BYD plug-in, Zhu found himself “obsessed”.Wu, of NLVC, says BYD’s more upmarket Han model is “revolutionary” with a price tag of around Rmb200,000-ish but features more commonly found on cars costing Rmb500,000 and above. “In terms of exteriors and interiors, Tesla’s Model 3 is like a raw space, while BYD’s Han model is like a furnished apartment,” he adds. “Which one will you choose?” Data visualisation by Steven Bernard More

  • in

    S.Korea export downtrend likely slowed in June, offers hope for global trade: Reuters poll

    SEOUL (Reuters) – South Korea’s downtrend in exports likely slowed in June, with the trade balance set to swing to a surplus for the first time in 16 months, a Reuters survey showed, raising the prospect of an end to a sustained fall in shipments that began late last year.South Korea – a bellwether for global trade – is the first major exporting economy to report monthly trade figures, providing clues on the health of world demand.Outbound shipments in June were expected to have fallen 3.0% from the year before, much slower than the 15.2% drop in May, according to the median estimate of 17 economists in the survey conducted from June 22 to June 28.That would mark the slowest fall for the current trend of year-on-year declines that began in October 2022. Two of the surveyed economists predicted marginal growth in exports for this month.”We expect the trend of South Korean exports to improve gradually going forward with continuously robust automobile exports and smaller losses in semiconductor exports,” said economist Chun Kyu-yeon at Hana Securities. “There is a high possibility of a significant rebound in the growth rates during the second half of this year,” Chun said.Global demand for goods has been weakening over the past year as many economies struggled with high inflation and the subsequent streak of interest rate increases to tame price pressures.A positive turn in shipments in South Korea might offer some hope of a recovery in global export trade, though data in China has so far continued to show softness. In the first 20 days of this month, South Korea exported goods worth 5.3% more than the year before, logging the first increase since August, thanks to sharp gains in cars and ships as well as a softer fall in semiconductors. “If it is confirmed that the exports recovery is being led by semiconductors, it would be a clear positive for the growth outlook for the second half,” wrote Oh Suk-tae, an economist at Societe Generale (OTC:SCGLY). “The financial market would also welcome a potential trade surplus for the first time since February last year,” Oh added.The country’s imports in June likely fell 11.0% from a year earlier, after a 14.0% drop in May, according to the survey, which also provided a median forecast for a monthly trade surplus of $2.51 billion. South Korea will report its full monthly trade figures for June on Saturday, July 1, at 9 a.m. (0000 GMT). More