More stories

  • in

    Robust US economy may not need Trump’s big reforms

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President-elect Donald Trump campaigned on promises of aggressive import tariffs, strict immigration curbs, deregulation and smaller government, but the economy he inherits next week may be screaming for something different.Namely, don’t break anything.With output expanding above trend, the labor market near maximum employment and adding jobs, and the embers of inflation still smoldering, Trump may be launching his promised reforms into an economy less in need of the sort of stimulus his 2017 tax cuts provided. As a stock selloff following last week’s strong December jobs report showed, it may also be prone to correction given high asset values and a bond market that has been moving yields higher. “Success for the Trump administration would be to do no harm to the exceptionally performing economy it is inheriting,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s (NYSE:MCO) Analytics. On their face, the planned combination of tariffs, deportations, and deficit-funded tax cuts “will do harm. How much … depends on how aggressively these policies are pursued.”           Trump will take office next week under far different economic circumstances than when he started his first four-year term in 2017.”The constraints are different, starting with inflation,” which is not yet fully controlled from a pandemic-era spike and has shown little year-over-year improvement in recent months, said Karen Dynan, a Harvard University economics professor and former Obama administration official. Trump also faces larger federal deficits and higher government borrowing costs than before, and a labor force that has grown faster than expected because of immigration, something Trump wants to curtail. Referring to recent U.S. performance that has outstripped that of other developed nations and surprised many economists, Dynan said that “if you believe the economic growth in excess of trend is from immigration, it is going to be hard to get numbers as large as we saw in the latter part of the Biden administration.”NEW LANDSCAPE When Trump first entered the White House in 2017 the economy had been growing steadily since the end of the 2007-2009 financial crisis, but the pace was often sluggish and employment had not fully recovered. There was room for the boost Trump’s signature Tax Cuts and Job Act provided, and while the import tariffs that followed dealt a blow to the global economy, the U.S. proved largely resilient.What had been the longest U.S. economic expansion in modern times ended only when the COVID-19 pandemic began in March 2020. Inflation was a distant concern back then, seemingly anchored below the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Homebuyers could find 30-year fixed-rate mortgages at around 4%, and the government was financing its operations with long-term Treasury bond rates at around 3%.Today, inflation is stingily hanging above the Federal Reserve’s target, mortgage rates are nearing 7%, and 30-year Treasury yields are around 5% and rising, a fact that may reflect market doubts about whether inflation is contained and about U.S. financial discipline going forward.”There is still a concern inflation may not be beaten … We are going to fix that problem, so don’t worry about it,” Fed Governor Christopher Waller said last week of rising long-term bond yields. But “the other thing getting more and more attention is the concern about fiscal deficits … If that does not seem to change going forward, at some point the markets are going to demand a premium … That is starting to be what we are seeing.”While Trump has created an informal Department of Government Efficiency to find savings, there’s no plan to address the major deficit drivers: health and retirement benefits for seniors that both political parties consider sacrosanct.’PERFORMING VERY, VERY WELL’If government borrowing costs and the vigilance of bond markets pose one potential set of constraints for Trump, the state of the economy could pose another.The major data that Fed staff and officials watch, including figures on employment, inflation, consumer spending and overall growth, may not offer much room for improvement without risks.The unemployment rate in December was 4.1%, for example, near or below many estimates of what’s considered sustainable without generating inflation, and the economy gained an impressive 256,000 jobs. With wages growing, consumer spending remains healthy. Inflation is drifting lower but is still more than half a percentage point above target, with concerns that it could be reignited by any aggressive move to boost output that may already be exceeding potential or by added costs from things like tariffs.”The U.S. economy is just performing very, very well,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in a Dec. 18 press conference at the end of the central bank’s last policy meeting. “We have to stay on task, though,” with monetary policy remaining tight enough to return inflation to 2% while keeping the job market intact.Between Trump’s plans and the economy’s strength, there’s growing doubt about whether the Fed will be able to cut rates much further, if at all.The uncertainty about what’s ahead is rooted in the gap between Trump’s expansive rhetoric about what he seems to think the economy needs and the actual economic performance over the last year in particular.The Fed’s meeting last month saw staff beginning to suggest slower growth and higher unemployment may be the immediate result of expected trade and other policies. Policymakers publicly have highlighted the uncertainty they are dealing with while also attempting some balance.Noting that businesses themselves have been optimistic about upcoming conditions, despite possible disruptions from tariffs and deportations, “I expect more upside than downside in terms of growth,” Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin said last week even as he also acknowledged possible inflation risks.And, Barkin said of the incoming administration’s likely policy initiatives, “you could walk some of them back if they prove to be damaging.” More

  • in

    US imposes export controls on chips for AI to counter China

    $99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More

  • in

    Robust US jobs report increases odds of no-landing: BCA

    The unemployment rate edged down to 4.1% from 4.2%, and the underemployment rate also saw a decrease to 7.5% from 7.7%. The labor force participation rate remained steady at 62.5%. In terms of wages, there was a negligible change, with year-over-year growth maintaining at 3.9%.BCA Research indicated that these figures point to a persistently healthy labor market, albeit one that is on a cooling trajectory. The data aligns with the previous month’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) which showed both layoffs and hiring rates to be moderate. The report’s findings have prompted a market response, with bond yields climbing and stock markets dipping, as expectations for the next Federal Reserve interest rate cut are now delayed until later in 2025.Despite the positive labor market data, BCA Research suggests that it is improbable for the labor market to strengthen significantly due to the current tight financial conditions exerting pressure on the real economy. The firm advises investors to adopt a cautious approach, recommending a slight preference for government bonds and cash over assets considered to be overvalued.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More

  • in

    Why global bond yields are surging

    The global bond rout could potentially hinder the actions of central banks, which have been reducing short-term interest rates. These rate cuts are intended to decrease borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. The uptick in yields is making borrowing more expensive, leading to what Wall Street refers to as “tightening financial conditions”. The average 30-year U.S. mortgage rate increased to 6.9% last week.According to Wall Street Journal’s analysis, analysts largely attribute the recent bond-market selloff to the U.S. yields on U.S. Treasurys, which increase when bond prices decrease, received their first significant boost in October following the release of robust monthly jobs data. This data dispelled concerns of an imminent recession. Further contributing to the surge, Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election, promising policies that many investors perceive as inflationary. Additionally, Federal Reserve officials altered their forecasts to fewer rate cuts in 2025.Yields on ultrasafe government debt are primarily determined by investor expectations of what short-term interest rates will average over the lifetime of a bond. Yields on U.S. Treasurys are higher than those on German bonds due to lower rates in Europe, where the economy is weaker.However, changes in yields typically exhibit correlation. When Treasury yields increase, investors looking for a better return may sell their German bonds to purchase U.S. Treasurys. This action can cause German bond yields to rise as well.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More

  • in

    Denmark ready to discuss Greenlad security interests amid Trump’s aspirations

    Rasmussen acknowledged the legitimacy of American security interests in the region and emphasized the importance of cooperation with Greenland in any ongoing talks with the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump.At a news conference in Jerusalem, Rasmussen addressed the issue, stating, “We agree that the Americans have certain concerns about the security situation in the Arctic, which we share and therefore in close cooperation with Greenland, we are ready to continue talks with the incoming U.S. president, in order to ensure legitimate American interests.”The renewed interest from the United States in Greenland has been evident in recent statements from President-elect Trump. Having first expressed a desire to acquire Greenland in 2019, Trump has escalated his interest, not ruling out the use of economic or military force to assert control over the region.The response from Danish and European officials to the prospect of American control over Greenland has been largely negative. They have firmly stated that Greenland is not for sale and that its territorial integrity is crucial.This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C. More

  • in

    China’s trade surplus hits annual record of almost $1tn

    $99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More

  • in

    The US labour market is not cooling

    $99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More