Aurelia Butler

Investment in AI has surged since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in 2022, as companies across sectors seek to integrate artificial intelligence into their products and services.AI requires enormous computing power, pushing demand for specialized data centers that enable tech companies to link thousands of chips together in clusters.Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been investing billions to enhance its AI infrastructure and broaden its data-center network.Analysts expect Microsoft’s fiscal 2025 capital expenditure including capital leases to be $84.24 billion, according to Visible Alpha. The company’s capital expenditure in the first quarter of fiscal 2025 rose 5.3% to $20 billion.As OpenAI’s primary backer, the tech giant is considered a leading contender among Big Tech companies in the AI race due to its exclusive partnership with the AI chatbot maker. More than half of Microsoft’s $80 billion investment will be in the United States, Vice Chair and President Brad Smith said in the blog post. “Today, the United States leads the global AI race thanks to the investment of private capital and innovations by American companies of all sizes, from dynamic start-ups to well-established enterprises,” Smith said. More

(Reuters) – Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler said on Friday the U.S. central bank is uncertain about what the economy will deliver in 2025 and will let upcoming economic data drive the course of monetary policy.In light of Fed forecasts last month for fewer interest rate cuts in 2025, “there is a view that we can take our time, to slow down” and be more “gradual” while watching the data to see if sticky inflation pressures start to ease again, Kugler said in a CNBC interview. If the resilient job market starts to lose steam, however, “we would be ready to act in a different direction” with monetary policy, she said. “We’re always responding” to what happens in the economy “and seeing what is happening in front of us,” the official added.In the interview, the central banker said the economy is in a good place and while the job market has cooled, it remains resilient with a still historically low unemployment rate.Asked how she expects the policies of the incoming Trump administration to affect the economy, Kugler noted there are many moving pieces, making it hard to say how things will play out.Kugler’s comments on TV were her first public remarks since the central bank’s most recent policy meeting, and were among the first made by a central banker as 2025 begins. At the Fed’s mid-December Federal Open Market Committee meeting, officials lowered by a quarter percentage point their interest rate target range to between 4.25% and 4.5%. At the meeting, policymakers pulled back on rate cut estimates in 2025 while raising projections of where inflation would stand.For some, the change in outlook called into question why the Fed had cut rates at all given how long officials expect it will be before they hit their 2% inflation target. The new year brings considerable uncertainty for the Fed with the return of Donald Trump to the presidency. The president-elect campaigned on a platform of heavy trade tariffs and deportations, which most economists believe is a recipe to reignite inflation. But officials have been cautious in reacting to the election outcome given a lack of details on what will be implemented and how.”There is a wide set of scenarios and I think everybody’s considering that wide set of scenarios,” Kugler said. Earlier on Friday, Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin said that since tariffs could be implemented in many ways, “uncertainty should come down as policies are finalized, although it’s easy to imagine an extended period of back and forth” as elected leaders hash out the policy agenda. “I see more risk on the inflation side,” Barkin added, while noting the Fed is “well-positioned” on the policy front for whatever the economy sends its way.She signaled a reluctance to further ease policy. “I put myself in the camp of wanting to stay restrictive for longer as opposed to the other school, which would be ‘we’re done, so why not take rates down to neutral,'” she said. More

$75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. bank regulator told banks to pause dabbling directly in crypto in 2022 and 2023, but did not order them to stop providing banking services to crypto companies contrary to industry complaints of widespread “debanking,” according to documents released on Friday. A judge ordered the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to provide versions of supervisory “pause letters” it sent to unidentified banks after History Associates Incorporated, a research firm hired by crypto exchange Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), sued the agency to release them.The FDIC first released the letters in December but was ordered by the judge to resubmit them with more “nuanced redactions.” The new batch of 25 letters includes two additional letters sent to unidentified banks that were not included in the original FDIC submission.The litigation is part of a campaign by Coinbase to expose what it and other crypto companies say has been a concerted effort on the part of U.S. bank supervisors to choke off crypto companies from the traditional financial system.Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewel, said in a post on X Friday that the less redacted letters show a “coordinated effort to stop a wide variety of crypto activity” and called for further investigation by Congress.In a bid to combat those claims, the FDIC also on Friday published a 2022 internal memo detailing how supervisors should assess queries from lenders looking to directly deal in crypto assets, versus offering banking services to crypto companies. Together, the documents provide a rare glimpse into the confidential bank supervisory process. They suggest that while FDIC examiners have been cautious towards the crypto sector, which has been beset by scams, bankruptcies and volatility, they did not order banks to entirely cut off the crypto sector. The documents are being released weeks before President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration is expected to outline a broad crypto policy overhaul. Trump is expected to issue an executive order directing bank regulators to go easier on the sector, potentially as early as his Jan. 20 inauguration.Several of the FDIC letters show staff directed banks to either pause entering crypto initiatives or refrain from further expanding client crypto services. In others, the FDIC required banks to answer detailed questions before proceeding further with crypto ventures. The internal memo, meanwhile, distinguishes between a bank engaging directly in crypto activities, like holding crypto assets in custody, and offering traditional banking services for crypto clients, like lending and providing deposit accounts. The first category requires stricter scrutiny, it says.The memo echoes comments made in December by FDIC Chairman Martin Gruenberg, who told reporters the agency does not “debank” crypto firms in terms of access to bank accounts, but direct crypto engagement by banks is a “subject of supervisory attention.””Crypto-related activities may pose significant safety and soundness and consumer protection risks, as well as financial stability concerns,” the memo notes, adding such risks are still “evolving.” More

BALTIMORE (Reuters) -The U.S. central bank’s benchmark policy rate should stay restrictive until it is more certain that inflation is returning to its 2% target, Richmond Federal Reserve President Thomas Barkin said on Friday.”I think there is more upside risk than downside risk” to inflation, given the economy’s continued strength and the possibility of renewed wage and other price pressures, Barkin told the Maryland Bankers Association in Baltimore. “I put myself in the camp of wanting to stay restrictive for longer as opposed to the other school, which would be ‘we’re done, so why not take rates down to neutral.'”Though Barkin is not a voting member of the Fed’s rate-setting committee this year, his comments reflect a developing debate inside the central bank about when to cut interest rates again and how to account for an increasingly uncertain economic environment as President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take power again later this month.Barkin anticipates a generally positive economic outlook for the coming year, with consumer spending likely to remain strong and businesses generally optimistic about what they see as pro-business tax and regulatory policies from the new administration. Heightened price sensitivity among consumers, meanwhile, should keep inflation in check and declining towards the Fed’s target, Barkin said.The impact of Trump’s trade and immigration policies, however, could also add to price and wage pressures, while the economy’s overall strength holds risks as well that inflation may remain elevated. “How economic policy uncertainty resolves will matter. But, with what we know today, I expect more upside than downside in terms of growth,” Barkin said, with potentially “more risk on the inflation side” if, for example, hiring strengthens.With businesses optimistic and consumers still spending, Barkin said he felt the job market “is more likely to break toward hiring than toward firing.”INFLATION UNCERTAINTYThe Fed cut its benchmark policy rate by a quarter of a percentage point at its meeting last month, and lowered it a full percentage point over its final three meetings of 2024.But one key measure of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index excluding food and energy, was at 2.8% in November and has been stuck in the 2.6%-2.8% range since May. Trump’s victory in the Nov. 5 U.S. presidential election has thrown further doubt around the upcoming path of prices, with his threat to impose higher tariffs on imports and tighten immigration controls possibly adding to costs that businesses may try to pass through to consumers. Fed policymakers in December projected the benchmark rate would fall only another half of a percentage point this year, and investors largely expect the central bank to hold its policy rate in the current 4.25%-4.50% range at its Jan. 28-29 meeting.The case for further reductions, Barkin said, would hinge on “real confidence that inflation has stably gotten down to the 2% target … The second would be a significant weakening on the demand side of the economy.” More