More stories

  • in

    Turkish president sees $1 billion trade with Venezuela in 2022

    Maduro traveled on Tuesday to Turkey, one of the few countries that maintains a relationship with Venezuela despite long-running U.S. sanctions.Venezuela is “a very important partner in Latin America and the Caribbean. … We are friends in bad times. We have an exemplary friendship,” Erdogan said, noting that he opposes sanctions and will remain “faithful” to Venezuela.Bilateral trade grew to $850 million in 2021 from $150 million in 2019, and could rise to $3 billion, Erdogan said, without elaborating.Erdogan could visit Venezuela in July, he said.The countries signed new deals on agriculture and tourism, though no details were given.”Now’s the time for Turkish investors in Venezuela,” Maduro said, listing the tourism, mining, industry, oil, gas, coal and banking sectors as ready to receive new investments. More

  • in

    ‘Data DAO’ Delphia raises $60M Series A led by Multicoin Capital

    The Series A was led by crypto-focused venture firm Multicoin Capital, with additional participation from Ribbit Capital, FTX Ventures, Valor Equity Partners, FJ Labs, Lattice (OTC:LTTC) Ventures and Cumberland. Delphia will use the funds to launch a new rewards token as well as expand the ways users can contribute data to algorithmic models, which will be used to enhance investor returns. Continue Reading on Coin Telegraph More

  • in

    An ECB quandary: the hunt for a neutral euro zone interest rate

    (Reuters) – Euro zone interest rates rising to at least 0% by September seems like a done deal as inflation soars, but how high rates should go thereafter is dividing policymakers and economists in a bloc of 19 vastly different economies.The European Central Bank meets on Thursday and is expected to confirm its first rate rise will come in July. Like other central banks, its focus is now turning towards finding the neutral rate: high enough to tame inflation, but not so high it kills growth.The difficulty is identifying where exactly this rate lies. It’s a hotly debated issue globally. For instance, many economists disagree with the Federal Reserve’s estimate of a 2.4% long-run U.S. rate. The ECB’s task is even trickier, given its remit ranges from Italy, with debt at 150% of GDP, to Germany, whose debt ratio is less than half that. Unsurprisingly, estimates among ECB policymakers and the investment banking community diverge widely. Some ECB officials, including Bank of France Governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau see the neutral rate at between 1% and 2%. Slovakia’s hawkish Peter Kazimir reckons it’s closer to 2%, while Spain’s Pablo Hernandez de Cos puts it around or slightly above 1%.Nonetheless, policymakers confronted with soaring inflation are increasingly referring to the neutral rate as a yardstick to measure how high rates should rise this cycle.”It’s somewhat of a new way of communicating the monetary policy stance that fits the situation,” said Allianz (ETR:ALVG)’s global head of macroeconomic and capital markets research Andreas Jobst. In a supply shock world, “the inflation forecast is no longer helpful, so you need to find a different way of anchoring your forward guidance, and the neutral rate, you cannot touch it, you cannot see it. It gives you the flexibility.”ECB president Christine Lagarde believes borrowing costs should be normalised “towards the neutral rate” if inflation is seen stabilising around 2% in the medium term. But she stopped short of estimating where neutral might be or how fast the bank should move. In markets, rates are seen reaching over 1.8% in 2024, traders having ramped that bet up sharply after a much higher than expected May euro zone inflation print. GRAPHIC: Markets bet ECB will hike interest rates fast Markets bet ECB will hike interest rates fast (https://graphics.reuters.com/EUROZONE-MARKETS/zdpxowdowvx/chart.png) ONE SIZE FITS NOBODYThe debate provides a glimpse of the challenges the ECB faces as it tries to unwind years of stimulus while containing fragmentation risks – the divide between the bloc’s poorer and wealthier states, reflected in diverging borrowing costs.Villeroy and Kazimir have called for a move to neutral territory next year. The latter sees a 1.5% rate as insufficient to tame prices – but Italian board member Fabio Panetta, seen as a dove, has warned that “normal does not mean neutral” in policy terms.While inflation is the ECB’s primary mandate, achieving neutral rates won’t ease supply chains or cut energy costs, but may well worsen the fragile economic outlook, said Credit Agricole (OTC:CRARY) ECB watcher Louis Harreau. “Not only do countries have different neutral rates, but on top of that, the transmission of the monetary policy is not the same for all countries, due primarily to sovereign spreads,” Harreau said, referring to the premium charged for weaker states to borrow over top-rated Germany.Allianz estimates Germany’s neutral rate at 1.5%, compared with 0.7% in Italy, and 1.3% for the euro area overall.The divergence reflects below-potential economic output, weaker productivity and higher debt in southern European states. Member countries’ unemployment and inflation rates also diverge widely – euro zone inflation hit 8.1% in May, but was 20.1% in Estonia and 5.6% in Malta. “Is it one size fits all?” Danske Bank chief analyst Piet Christiansen said of a euro zone neutral rate. “Not really, it’s probably like one size fits not really anyone.” GRAPHIC: Euro zone inflation is at record highs (https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/egpbkwxeovq/ecb0706.PNG) DANGER?The ECB’s Panetta cautions against relying on unobservable neutral rate to guide policy, calling for a gradual removal of stimulus in times of high economic uncertainty. Take Italy: UniCredit, assuming the country’s neutral rate is below 1.5%, notes that three-year borrowing costs have risen above this level, now at 2%, meaning its economy may face restrictive conditions as support from cheap ECB loans fades. Erik Nielsen, chief economics advisor at the bank, says the ECB risks losing control of its narrative by abandoning previous references to observable “financing conditions” in favour of neutral rates.Conducting monetary policy with an eye on the neutral rate is “like driving a car through the desert aiming for an oasis on the horizon, that you know is nothing more than a Fata Morgana,” he told clients in a recent note. More

  • in

    CDC awards $215 million as part of Cancer Moonshot initiative revival

    The funding will be given to 86 recipients https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/about/foa-dp22-2202, including various U.S. states as well as indigenous tribes such as Cherokee Nation, Kaw Nation of Oklahoma and Navajo Nation, among others.It is part of an overall five-year investment plan worth $1.1 billion into three national programs to prevent and control cancer, the CDC said https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/p0608-cancer-award.html on Wednesday.”This funding is a critical investment in support of President Biden’s Cancer Moonshot initiative and our efforts to help ensure that everyone in the United States equitably benefits from the tools we have to detect and diagnose cancer,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in the CDC statement.U.S. President Joe Biden in February announced plans to reduce death rate from cancer by at least 50% over the next 25 years by speeding research and making more treatments available under the “Cancer Moonshot” initiative. The initiative, launched in 2016, was led by Biden when he was vice-president. More

  • in

    U.S. loosens restrictions on Cuba travel, remittances amid summit blowback

    WASHINGTON/HAVANA (Reuters) – The United States on Wednesday moved to lift some Trump-era restrictions on remittances and travel to Cuba even as it fended off criticism for blocking the Communist-run island and long-time foe from attending a regional summit this week.The amended regulations, set to be published in the U.S. Federal Register on Thursday, will provide further fine print around a broader easing of U.S. restrictions on Cuba first announced by the administration of President Joe Biden in May.A Treasury Department official said publication of the new regulations was purposefully aligned with the U.S.-hosted Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles. The conference was initially conceived as a platform to showcase U.S. leadership and support for Latin America. But that agenda has been partially undermined by a boycott by some regional leaders upset at Washington’s decision to exclude Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua.Washington has said it has concerns about human rights and a lack of democracy in those three nations.The Cuba-related rule changes this week allow U.S. citizens to once again travel to Cuba on group educational trips hosted by U.S.-based travel companies or organizations, and to attend professional meetings and conferences in Cuba.The regulations also lift a $1,000 quarterly limit on family remittances to Cuban nationals who are close relatives and allow U.S. citizens to send funds to non-family members on the island.The Biden administration last week removed restrictions on flights to Cuba imposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump, including ending a prohibition on U.S. airline flights to Cuban airports other than Havana.The United States has also promised to ramp up the number of immigrant visas it issues to Cuban nationals in a bid to combat a growing migration crisis at its border.Cuba´s government has welcomed the changes but says they fall far short of lifting the Cold War-era embargo imposed on it by the United States, which it blames for the island’s economic crisis. More

  • in

    IMF's Gopinath sees risk of de-anchoring U.S. inflation expectations

    NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. inflation could remain above the Federal Reserve’s targets for a long time based on current projections, and there is a risk of inflation expectations “de-anchoring,” International Monetary Fund First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath said on Wednesday.Based on current projections of what the interest rate path may be, inflation will stay above the Fed’s 2% target “for a long time,” said Gopinath, speaking at an online event hosted by the Financial Times.”That’s an environment that we’re not used to being in, you could risk their inflation expectations de-anchoring,” she said.Gopinath spoke of an “incredibly narrow” path that would allow for the tightness in goods and labor markets to unwind without rates rising much more.However, she said, “overall, the risks are towards the possibility that this will require much more steeper increases in rates.”The Fed has raised rates twice so far this year and 50-basis point hikes are priced in for both its meeting next week and the following one in July.U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said separately on Wednesday that the current annual inflation rate of 8% is “unacceptable” for the United States and 2% is an “appropriate target.” More

  • in

    New reports highlight gloomy outlook for global economy

    Good eveningTwo heavyweight reports on prospects for the world economy make grim reading, highlighting the devastating effect of the war in Ukraine on top of the damage wrought by the pandemic.The OECD, in its twice-yearly World Economic Outlook today, warned of the “hefty price” of taking a stance against Russia’s invasion, forecasting lower growth and high inflation, with poorer countries hit particularly hard.The club of rich nations cut its global growth forecast for this year to 3 per cent, down from 4.5 per cent in December, even lower than the IMF’s recent estimate of 3.6 per cent. For 2023, growth would be still lower at 2.8 per cent. The OECD expects inflation to average 8.5 per cent across the bloc in 2022 and 6 per cent in 2023, with energy price rises spreading out into other areas.The OECD singled out the UK, which it said would experience the weakest growth in the G20 outside Russia next year, hit by a unique combination of high inflation, rising interest rates, increasing taxes and “probably a bit of Brexit”. The forecast was 3.6 per cent for this year and zero for 2023 as the economy stagnated “due to depressed demand”.The organisation warned against letting poor countries shoulder the burden of the war, particularly the threat to food supplies, a danger also highlighted today by Turkey’s foreign minister. Commodities correspondent Emiko Terazono says the west must move fast to tackle the crisis as grain importers teeter on the edge of catastrophe, while Russian president Vladimir Putin tries to throw the blame on to western sanctions. Today the Kremlin rejected claims that war was fuelling the situation.The OECD report follows yesterday’s Global Economic Prospects update from the World Bank, which highlighted the damage from the war to developing countries and the prospects of a debt crisis, with 75mn more people pushed into extreme poverty than expected in 2019. It likened global conditions to those of the 1970s, when inflation led to steep interest rate rises and a global recession.Warning signs are already visible in global finance with emerging markets hit by the worst sell off in decades as investors rush to safety.The war in Ukraine meant stark choices for the west, said OECD chief economist Laurence Boone. “There is a price [of Russia’s invasion] and the questions for policymakers are, how high is the price, and how should it be shared. If you don’t share it well, the price will be higher.”Latest newsUK’s biggest fertiliser producer CF Industries to shut plant as energy costs biteUK decides against imposing direct rule in the British Virgin IslandsMishcon IPO stalled for ‘foreseeable future’ due to poor market conditionsFor up-to-the-minute news updates, visit our live blogNeed to know: the economyThe war in Ukraine means the EU may have to revise its seven-year budget sooner than planned, reports our Europe Express newsletter. Frankfurt bureau chief Martin Arnold previews tomorrow’s policy meeting of the European Central Bank as it prepares to end eight years of bond-buying and negative interest rates, while economics editor Chris Giles warns of a miserable few months ahead. Latest for the UK and EuropeIndustry data showed UK retail sales fell 1.1 per cent in May, the biggest drop since January last year, as consumers tightened their belts and reconsidered major purchases such as furniture and electronics. The trend was also highlighted in separate data from payments company Barclaycard.So much for the UK government’s “levelling up” agenda. Official data show London still outperforms the rest of the country in economic growth. Northern Ireland, which is still in the EU single market for goods, is the only other region back above pre-pandemic levels. However, UK ministers are still threatening to rip up the protocol which guarantees the province’s special status, a move that could also see the UK booted out of the EU Horizon research programme.The International Energy Agency warned that Europe, especially industrial gas users, could experience energy rationing from the combination of a cold winter and resurgent demand in China.The Turkish lira continued to slide after President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reiterated his intention to keep cutting interest rates despite surging inflation, which hit 73.5 per cent last month.Global latestIn another example of the gathering gloom for the world economy, Bridgewater, the world’s biggest hedge fund, is betting on a sell-off in US and European corporate bonds this year. Greg Jensen, its co-chief investment officer, also warned that the biggest risk facing the US economy was that the Federal Reserve was effectively out of ammo.US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen urged Congress to do more to ease the burden of inflation and build on proposals such as reducing prescription drug prices and improving access to affordable housing.Bank of Japan governor Haruhiko Kuroda apologised today for his claim that consumers had become “tolerant” of price rises, the same day that the yen hit a 20-year low against the dollar, driving up prices of crucial imported goods. The soaring cost of living is likely to be a key factor in elections to the country’s upper house in July.Australia has increased interest rates by 50 basis points, the biggest jump since February 2000, to curb the surge in inflation. Up to now, price increases have been lower than in many other countries, but jumps in food and fuel costs have started to dent consumer confidence. Social media companies in Brazil, which is gearing up for a potentially turbulent general election in October, are cracking down on fake news, said to be a key factor in the 2018 election of Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right president will meet US president Joe Biden this week at the Summit of the Americas.Need to know: businessSwiss bank Credit Suisse issued its third profit warning since January, highlighting damage to its investment banking division by market volatility due to the war in Ukraine.Spanish group Inditex reported an 80 per cent jump in profits for the first quarter of €760mn as sales at the world’s biggest clothing retailer passed pre-pandemic levels. In the US, changing consumer behaviour was blamed for a second profit warning at Target in less than a month. Like its rival Walmart, the retailer has found it difficult to pass on higher prices to consumers and has been hit by increased freight, fuel and labour costs. Part of the problem, says the Lex column, is that poor inventory management means the company is stuck with piles of goods it cannot sell, but this could mean good news for off-price discount chains such as TJX.After more than a decade of discussions, the EU agreed a new law on a single standard charger — USB-C — for smartphones, laptop computers and accessories, which it says will save consumers €250mn. The move is a blow for Apple which uses proprietary Lightning connectors.Fintech companies in the insurance sector are among the biggest casualties in the recent sell-off of tech stocks, as investors ditch high-growth businesses for those that generate reliable prospects. The self-styled disrupters now have to persuade a much more sceptical market that their business models are worth sticking with.UK online car seller Cazoo cut hundreds of jobs, blaming rising inflation and interest rates for a slowdown in investment. Such consumer-facing companies are likely to be badly affected by a recession which could follow the cost of living crisis.Small trades are sparking big price swings in the world’s biggest capital markets with liquidity at its worst level since the early days of the pandemic. The fraught conditions have coincided with the shift in the global economy towards slowing growth, rising interest rates and surging inflation, catching many portfolio managers off-guard.Apple entered the buy now, pay later market with a new scheme that allows consumers to pay for purchases in four instalments over six weeks without incurring interest. FT deputy editor Patrick Jenkins warned that the sector was getting out of control: “BNPL operators are money lenders, pure and simple. It is time to regulate this industry properly before it blows up in all our faces,” he wrote.FT reporters look at the future for the energy industry in Russia, home to a quarter of the world’s gas reserves and more than 5 per cent of its crude oil. Gas and oil continue to flow but long-term decline looks likely as foreign partners pull out and export destinations shrink. Business papers rarely report on porn even though it owns a big corner of the internet. The FT decided to change that: our new podcast series Hot Money looks at the decision makers and dealmakers behind the industry. What we found will surprise you.The World of WorkPoliticians in Brussels have agreed a deal to ensure workers across the EU are protected by adequate minimum wages and the promotion of collective bargaining. “This is a good day for social Europe,” said Nicolas Schmit, European commissioner for jobs and social rights, adding that it was “especially important at a time when many households are worried about making ends meet”. In spite of — or perhaps because of — new technology, people now say they are working harder to tighter deadlines under greater levels of tension, writes columnist Sarah O’Connor. This intensification of work could be one reason why the campaign for a four-day working week is gaining traction, she argues.Hybrid working means the emotional bridge provided by the best middle managers is becoming more important then ever, says Michael Skapinker. As long as they avoid “kissing up and kicking down” the oft-derided group is crucial to a company’s success, he maintains.Middle managers are also crucial in overseeing employee wellbeing. Our latest Working It podcast discusses whether hybrid working is making it harder to take time off sick and whether the growing acknowledgment of mental health problems means we ought to change the way we think about the need for time off for rest and recovery.Get the latest worldwide picture with our vaccine trackerAnd finally…FT editor Roula Khalaf interviewed Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy about his aims in the fight against Russia and what a peace deal might look like. Watch the video.

    Video: Volodymyr Zelenskyy: ‘No one is humiliating Ukraine. They are killing us’ More

  • in

    Time to lift Trump’s tariffs on China to fight inflation

    The writer is Chazen Professor of Global Business at Columbia Business SchoolCombating inflation has been on President Joe Biden’s mind lately. But any mention of the high tariffs on Chinese imports that he inherited from the Trump administration has been critically absent from these discussions. Between 2018 and 2019, the US and China engaged in a trade war that raised tariffs on thousands of internationally traded products. The import tariffs imposed by the US, and the Chinese retaliation on US exporters, jointly targeted 3.6 per cent of GDP. Their potential removal is currently subject to fierce debate. Unlike most issues, US trade policy cuts across party lines. Advocates for protectionism argue the tariffs are critical for building industrial capacity to counter China’s manufacturing prowess, and that they have not contributed to higher prices. But these supporters cannot have it both ways: tariffs can only help manufacturing jobs if they raise prices. If producers benefit from higher tariffs, it is precisely because consumers are made worse off by them. Suppose a car mechanic chooses to import tyres from China for $100 apiece rather than the slightly more expensive American version. Would the American producer benefit when the US government raises tariffs on the Chinese tyres by 25 per cent?The answer hinges on what happens to the after-tariff price of imports. At one extreme, if the Chinese exporter cannot find another buyer, it may reduce its price and leave the after-tariff price at $100. In this case, the government collects the tariff revenue, and the car mechanic experiences no direct impact. This is what Trump meant when he declared that the Chinese were paying for the tariffs. But because the after-tariff price has not changed, the American tyre producer, who lost business to the Chinese supplier, does not directly benefit. Consider, instead, the extreme where the after-tariff price rises to $125. Now the car mechanic is adversely affected. Since import prices have increased, the tariffs shield the US tyre producer from import competition. The gains to the tyre producer have come at the expense of the mechanic.This illustrates how tariffs favour producers at the expense of consumers. But to what extent this happens hinges on the after-tariff price. Only the data can tell us the real world impact. In a rare instance of economists agreeing, peer-reviewed studies by several teams conclude that the second extreme has materialised: after-tariff prices went up by the full magnitude of the tariffs. US consumers have borne the brunt of the trade war. These price increases should benefit American producers. Unfortunately, the answer is more complex. Today, most global trade occurs in intermediate parts rather than final goods. When it comes to tyres, the US also raised tariffs on carbon black — a key input — by 25 per cent. This increases manufacturing costs and undoes some of the benefits of protection. Additionally, China has not just sat silently by. It unleashed retaliatory tariffs on $100bn of US exports, including tyres. One study found that these higher inputs and tariff retaliations offset the benefits of protection for producers. Economists at the Federal Reserve found that manufacturing employment fell. Another study found that exports increased among ‘bystander’ countries like Malaysia and Mexico, not the US. The evidence confirms what economists had argued at the beginning of the trade war: tariffs are not an effective policy to bolster US manufacturing. Instead, they ultimately raised prices for everyone, with the retaliations hitting the Midwest particularly hard. Overall, the US economy is worse off. Reversing the tariffs will reduce prices for consumers. The impact on price levels would be modest since imports are only about 15 per cent of US GDP. But ending the trade war is the most immediate and effective policy in Biden’s mission to bring relief to the American consumer. More