Aurelia Butler

(Reuters) – Wall Street’s biggest banks expect the Federal Reserve to end the process of shrinking its balance sheet next April, holding the line relative to what they told the central bank in July. The banks also expect the Fed’s balance sheet to bottom out at $6.4 trillion, well above the $4.2 trillion mark seen before the coronavirus pandemic struck in early 2020, according to a survey of so-called primary dealers conducted by the New York Fed ahead of the central bank’s rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meeting, held last month. These banks serve as counterparties to Fed policy operations. “Most dealers indicated they expected the end of balance sheet reduction to be determined by assessments of reserve levels, [overnight reverse repo] take-up, or upward pressure on money market rates relative to administered rates,” the survey said. “Some dealers suggested that macro factors pose a risk to their outlook for the end of runoff,” it added. The release of the survey on Thursday follows by a day the U.S. central bank’s publication of its minutes of the Sept. 17-18 FOMC meeting. In that document, officials offered little fresh guidance about the balance sheet outlook beyond noting the importance of communicating that the ongoing drawdown can continue even when officials are cutting the Fed’s interest rate target.The latest Fed news on the balance sheet comes as market participants are still making sense of an unexpectedly turbulent end of the third quarter. The final trading day of September saw high short-term rate volatility and the first real world use of the Fed’s Standing Repo Facility, or SRF, a liquidity tool, although conditions have quickly returned to where they were prior to that. For a little over two years, the Fed has been shrinking its holdings of Treasury and mortgage bonds as part of a process called quantitative tightening, or QT. That’s taken overall Fed holdings from a peak of $9 trillion in the summer of 2022 to the current level of $7.1 trillion. For much of the drawdown, QT has effectively tightened monetary policy in tandem with Fed rate hikes, as policymakers sought to tame high levels of inflation. But with price pressures easing considerably the Fed cut its overnight target rate by half a percentage point last month, and for some in markets, that called into question the need to press forward with more balance sheet reduction. WATCHING MONEY MARKETSFed officials however have said repeatedly that what happens with the balance sheet is separate from interest rate policy, the primary lever of monetary policy. Central bankers have also reiterated the balance sheet drawdown will continue until excessive liquidity is removed from the financial system, even as they’re not sure when that point will arrive. “Reserves are still abundant and expected to remain so for some time,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said after the September meeting. “What that tells you is, we’re not thinking about, about stopping runoff” even as interest rates go down. Those expectations are being tested by money market conditions. On Sept. 30 short-term rates were unexpectedly volatile and for the first time market participants handed over a notable amount of eligible bonds to the Fed in exchange for cash at the SRF. While on the surface that might appear to echo events in September 2019, when the Fed ended its QT process due to interest rate volatility, in the current case the Fed never lost control of the federal funds target rate as it did back then. The daily effective fed funds rate last week never moved off of 4.83% – well inside the current policy target range of 4.75%-5.00% – whereas in 2019 it traded above the established target range at the time. Last week, rates on general collateral open market overnight repo transactions rose 9 basis points for a day, the most in about 11 months, but have since returned to around where they were.Most analysts view the latest turbulence as distinct from five years ago. “Last week’s rate spike was purely a function of dealer balance sheet constraints rather than broader banking sector liquidity issues,” said analysts at Wrightson ICAP (LON:NXGN), adding “reserve balances remained within the range of the past couple of years.” Some market participants contend that tighter conditions in the repo market, where participants borrow and lend bonds, may drive the Fed to end QT relatively soon. The meeting minutes showed that Fed officials and staff responsible for watching markets for signs of liquidity scarcity were keeping an eye on activity in the repo market.Noting that market indicators pointed to still “abundant” levels of reserves, the minutes flagged higher repo market rates amid large-scale Treasury debt sales. The Fed official responsible for implementing monetary policy pointed to the connections between the repo market and the federal funds rate, which drove home “the importance of monitoring a range of indicators to assess reserve conditions and the state of money markets,” the minutes said. More

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.The EU is launching an anti-dumping investigation into cheap plywood imports after complaints by the bloc’s domestic producers, opening another front in its trade conflict with China.EU producers say there has been a surge in cheap hardwood plywood coming from China, much of which they believe originates in Russia. Brussels banned Russian wood imports after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.The probe follows the EU’s imposition of tariffs of up to 45 per cent on Chinese electric vehicles last week. China responded to that with provisional tariffs on EU brandy exports and had already opened anti-dumping probes into pork and dairy products, The move has sparked fears by EU member states of an extended cycle of retaliatory moves on important products, while China argues the EU is being protectionist. As tensions heighten, the two sides have also filed multiple challenges to the other’s trade defence measures at the World Trade Organization.“This investigation is crucial to protect the entire EU hardwood plywood value chain,” said the Greenwood Consortium, which represents forest owners, loggers and suppliers to producers. “Unfairly priced Chinese imports — now apparently also using cheap conflict Russian timber that is banned in the EU — threaten the survival of many European businesses and jobs.”Lightweight. durable and made from trees such as beech, birch and poplar, layered hardwood plywood panels are used in roofs, walls and floors, as well as furniture, cars and ships. Capable of enduring very low temperatures, plywood products also line the holds of supercooled liquefied natural gas tankers.The main EU producers are in Poland, Finland, France and the Baltic states. Greenwood says the industry employs 10,000 people.The EU has already put tariffs on birch plywood imports from Kazakhstan and Turkey after finding they included some Russian content. New EU rules to prevent companies dodging tariffs by stockpiling during the investigation, which could take almost a year, will be used for the first time.All imports of Chinese goods will have to be registered at EU borders. If the EU decides to levy tariffs, they would then be applied retroactively.The EU imported about 750.000 cubic metres of hardwood plywood worth €327mn in 2023, according to Eurostat figures.That accounted for more than half of the bloc’s imports and 30 per cent of the total EU market.Several other countries including the US, Morocco, Turkey and South Korea have already placed punitive tariffs on Chinese wood imports. Brussels has condemned China for subsidising industries and exporting its overcapacity in manufactured goods below cost, opening more than a dozen investigations into products including tin plate, glue and monosodium glutamate. Alicia García Herrero, senior fellow at the Brussels-based Bruegel think-tank, said the EU’s fractured single market meant its companies could not compete with Chinese rivals.With Beijing expanding into industries the EU used to lead, the bloc will be forced to protect them.“The European Commission’s duties on Chinese electric vehicles signal that the time in which China-EU relations were governed by engagement is over,” she said. “China and the EU now compete with the same type of products on third markets. It is more important than ever that the rules of the game are fair.”  More

Save over 65%$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More