More stories

  • in

    Factbox-Key ministers in France’s new government line-up

    ANTOINE ARMAND, FINANCE MINISTERA relative newcomer to politics, Armand, 33, was first elected to parliament in 2022 on the centrist ticket of Macron’s camp and was re-elected in July’s snap legislative election.In the new parliament, he had been set to head the economic committee in the lower house until Barnier tapped him for the top job at the powerful Ministry of Economics and Finance.Armand is no stranger to “Bercy” as the ministry is often called in France, having joined its elite corps of finance inspectors after graduating in 2018 from the prestigious Ecole Nationale d’Administration – a training college for future senior civil servants that Macron also attended.He will be seconded by Laurent Saint-Martin on budget issues, a delicate portfolio that will report directly to the prime minister, as France struggles to contain a rising budget deficit and contemplates spending cuts and tax hikes.BRUNO RETAILLEAU, INTERIOR MINISTERA conservative senator since 2004, Bruno Retailleau, 63, is known for his hard-right views and is the most senior figure from his Republicans (LR) party to enter Barnier’s government. Retailleau was a driving force behind the party’s shift to the right in an increasingly polarised political landscape, in particular on hot-button issues such as immigration. As leader of the conservative group of senators, Retailleau has criticised Macron’s latest attempts to toughen immigration rules, calling for a much tougher stance that would include constitutional changes allowing welfare benefit cuts. He has also urged tougher policing on left-wing and environmental protesters and opposed Macron’s push to add the right for women to pursue an abortion to the constitution. JEAN-NOEL BARROT, FOREIGN MINISTERBarrot, 41, is promoted to foreign minister after serving as junior minister for European affairs since February 2024. Before that he was Macron’s minister for digital affairs.Barrot comes from a family with a strong political background. His father, Jacques Barrot, was a prominent French politician who served in various ministerial positions and as a European commissioner. He provides essential political balance for the government, hailing from the centrist party of Francois Bayrou, the political veteran whose independent MoDem party Macron needs to keep on his side.BENJAMIN HADDAD, EUROPE MINISTERHaddad, 38, a fluent English-speaker with excellent contacts in Washington, DC, where he spent years working at a think-tank, was first elected to parliament in 2022 under Macron’s party colours.He has been vocal on diplomatic issues and especially the war in Ukraine, having convinced tens of European lawmakers to sign a plea to the U.S. Congress to unlock aid for Ukraine at the end of 2023.SEBASTIEN LECORNU, DEFENCE MINISTERLecornu, a Macron loyalist, remains in his post at the helm of the Defence Ministry.A low-profile minister who started his career in conservative ranks, he was excluded from the Republicans after being named a junior minister in Macron’s government in 2017. More

  • in

    Legendary Trader John Bollinger Breaks Silence on Bitcoin (BTC) Price Action: Details

    Bollinger observes a W pattern forming on the weekly Bitcoin chart, marking a bullish setup. “Nice little W pattern on the weekly BTCUSD chart. I drew a regression channel to highlight the flag that is forming. Bullish setup, Awaiting confirmation,” the Bollinger band creator wrote in a recent tweet.A “W” pattern marks a double bottom, often regarded as a bullish signal. A double bottom is formed following a single rounding bottom pattern which can also be the first sign of a potential reversal.Bollinger mentioned a regression channel — a three-line technical indicator used to analyze the upper and lower limits of an existing trend, implying that he is closely watching Bitcoin’s price as it trades within this channel.Based on the regression channel, Bollinger observes that Bitcoin might be in the process of forming a bullish flag pattern, a classic continuation pattern that suggests the possibility of an upward breakout after a period of consolidation; for this, he awaits confirmation.Bitcoin soared this week, coinciding with a surge in the equities market as the Federal Reserve slashed interest rates by 50 basis points. Bitcoin rallied for four days in a row, reaching a high of $64,140 in Friday’s trading session before reducing gains.At the time of writing, BTC was down 0.63% in the last 24 hours to $63,087 and up 6.97% so far in September, which is often its weakest month of the year.According to IntoTheBlock, Bitcoin has become increasingly dominant over Ethereum and stablecoins, with a 6% increase in its dominance year-to-date.This article was originally published on U.Today More

  • in

    Is Fed cutting into an economic boom?

    The Federal Open Market Committee cut its benchmark rate to a range of 4.75% to 5.0%, its first reduction since March 2020, after leaving borrowing costs at a more than two-decade high for over a year. In the past, most of the Fed’s monetary easing cycles were triggered by financial crises that quickly morphed into economy-wide credit crunches, which caused recessions, said analysts at Yardeni Research, in a note dated Sept. 17. Since 1960, the Fed reduced the federal funds rate (FFR) by more than 500 bps during the average easing cycle.So it’s no wonder that the FFR futures market is increasingly expecting another 200 bps of cuts, after Wednesday’s 60 bps cut, over the next 12 months.However, most previous easing cycles started from much higher FFR levels, Yardeni Research added. Additionally, the Fed only cut the FFR by 25 bps three times during the 1995 easing cycle, the most recent soft landing.“In our opinion, lowering the FFR too much too fast could trigger an economic boom, in which real GDP grows at a brisk pace but with higher inflation risks. It could also trigger a 1990s style meltup in the stock market,” Yardeni added. More

  • in

    Why China’s battle with deflation may have global implications

    In August, consumer price inflation in China hit its fastest pace in half a year, but the data did little to assuage concerns over the state of demand in the world’s second-largest economy. Much of this was due to the fact that food prices — the main driver of the 0.6% uptick in China’s consumer price index compared to a year earlier — were bolstered mainly by inclement summer weather, rather than a more sustainable rebound in domestic demand.Core consumer inflation, stripping out items like food and fuel, came in at 0.3% in August, slowing from 0.4% in July. It was the lowest reading in almost three and a half years.At the same time, producer prices shrank by 1.8% year-on-year, accelerating from a decline of 0.8% in the prior month.Prolonged deflation presents a potential danger to the economic outlook, analysts at Morgan Stanley warned, adding that paycheck sizes in particular could see declines. Such a trend threaten to initiate a domino effect of declining spending, lower corporate revenues, and subsequent layoffs.In the 1990s, Japan entered into a similar stretch of deflation that sparked what has since become known as its “lost decades” — or a time of economic stagnation following the peak of the country’s meteoric post-World War II rise in the 1980s.”[A]s decades in Japan ha[ve] shown, deflation can lead to a cycle that becomes ever more difficult to break,” the Morgan Stanley analysts said in a note to clients.To avoid a similar fate, economists have argued that China’s government may need to roll out sweeping — and potentially expensive — measures to stem the deflationary cycle.Beijing has already attempted to reinvigorate the economy by putting loans into the industrial sector, although the aid for these firms has increased the supply of consumer goods without boosting overall demand, further fueling deflation.”Consequently, the short-run boost to employment, income, and thus domestic spending has been very limited,” the Morgan Stanley analysts said.At the moment, China has laid out a plan to hit 5% in real gross domestic product growth in 2024. But the deflationary pressures could threaten that goal, economists have said.Lawmakers may start to mull over providing fiscal support to housing and social welfare programs, the Morgan Stanley analysts predicted, saying these moves could shore up China’s “critical” real estate sector and bolster savings.However, they warned: “Despite the early signs of some shift in tone from Beijing, it is hard to imagine a meaningful change in direction for policy and subsequently the economy any time soon.”The ongoing battle with contracting prices is not confined to China alone, the analysts added, flagging that, from its position as one of the world’s key trading destinations, the country “continues to export disinflationary pressure globally.”They noted that China’s deflationary cycle has so far dented core inflation in both the US and eurozone by around 0.1 percentage point, adding that this a “meaningful” as central banks in both of the regions are beginning to embark on a fresh cycle of interest rate reductions. More

  • in

    Is high Bitcoin volatility a feature and not a bug?

    However, as per analysts at BCA Research, this volatility may not be a flaw but a unique feature that can enhance Bitcoin’s value in a diversified portfolio. Rather than seeing volatility as inherently negative, BCA argues that Bitcoin’s high volatility can serve as an advantage when viewed through the right lens.Historically, investors have shied away from Bitcoin because of its dramatic fluctuations. Over the years, the cryptocurrency has shown an average monthly volatility of 76.1%. By comparison, traditional assets such as bonds have much lower volatility, at 5.4%. Bitcoin’s history includes multiple significant drawdowns, with two occasions where it lost more than 70% of its value. For conservative investors, these numbers are alarming and often lead to the conclusion that Bitcoin is too risky to be considered a serious addition to any portfolio.BCA Research argues that looking at Bitcoin or any other asset just by its volatility is misleading. What really counts is how an asset fits into the overall portfolio and influences its risk and return. Focusing only on volatility misses the bigger picture of how the asset can add value in a diversified investment strategy.A recent paper by AQR, which BCA Research applies to Bitcoin, reframes the issue of high volatility. Asness argues that high-volatility assets can be more capital-efficient than their lower-volatility counterparts. Its because high-volatility assets like Bitcoin allow investors to achieve greater returns without committing a large portion of their portfolio to them. This frees up capital for other investments, enabling more flexible portfolio construction.BCA Research illustrates this with a comparison between Bitcoin and a hypothetical low-volatility asset they call Boringcoin. Both Bitcoin and Boringcoin share the same risk-adjusted return profile, with identical Sharpe ratios of 0.61, meaning that on a risk-adjusted basis, both assets perform equally well. However, where they differ is in their volatility. Boringcoin has the same volatility as bonds, 5.4%, far lower than Bitcoin. In practical terms, this means that investors would need to allocate more capital to Boringcoin to achieve the same portfolio returns they would get from a smaller allocation to Bitcoin.The difference becomes obvious when looking at a portfolio targeting 10% annual volatility. With Bitcoin, only 8% of the portfolio needs to be invested to hit the ideal balance of risk and return. “For the portfolio using Boringcoin, there is a large gap between the unconstrained and constrained versions, as the portfolio with Boringcoin would need to be leveraged by over 100% to fully maximize the expected returns per unit of risk from the assets in it, the analysts said.”To further this point, BCA Research ran portfolio optimizations that compared traditional stock-and-bond portfolios with those that included Bitcoin and Boringcoin. Bitcoin’s high volatility allows it to deliver strong returns with a relatively small allocation, freeing up capital for other assets. In a well-constructed portfolio, Bitcoin’s volatility becomes a tool for maximizing capital efficiency rather than a source of risk to be avoided. High-volatility assets like Bitcoin help achieve better returns per unit of risk, something more conservative assets like Boringcoin cannot match without leverage.However, handling a volatile asset like Bitcoin in the real world comes with challenges beyond what portfolio theory suggests. BCA Research points out that human emotions can complicate things. Managing money for clients isn’t just about numbers; it involves dealing with how people react to market swings. In reality, investors may struggle with Bitcoin’s sharp ups and downs, especially during big drops. While Bitcoin saw losses of over 70% at times, Boringcoin, with its lower volatility, only dropped by 7% in the same period. This emotional challenge makes it harder for investors to stick with high-volatility strategies, even if they offer better returns in theory.In fact, BCA makes a compelling comparison between Bitcoin and Boringcoin’s price charts. Boringcoin, with its smoother trajectory, would be far easier to sell to a board of conservative investors than Bitcoin, which resembles a financial rollercoaster.Even though Bitcoin might offer higher returns in the long run, the emotional burden of holding onto it through steep drawdowns could lead to premature selling, negating its benefits. More

  • in

    China ex central bank adviser proposes $1.4 trillion in stimulus measures

    China should introduce a basket of measures, focusing on enhancing social protections, buying unsold apartments for affordable housing and speeding up urban construction, Liu Shijin, former vice president of Development Research Center of the State Council, told the China Macroeconomy Forum, the Securities Times reported.Liu said the world’s second-biggest economy should not copy the quantitative easing of developed countries because China’s macroeconomic policy should aim at ensuring stability and balance during a “medium-speed growth stage”.Chinese policymakers will likely step up measures to at least help the economy meet this year’s increasingly challenging growth target of roughly 5%, analysts and policy advisers have said, with a sharper focus on boosting demand to fight persistent deflationary pressures.August economic data showed momentum in China’s export-led economic recovery remains frail. Domestic demand struggled to gain traction amid persistent deflationary threat.($1 = 7.0505 Chinese yuan renminbi) More

  • in

    What is the yield curve really telling us about the odds of recession?

    Save over 65%$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More

  • in

    Investors hope US rate cuts will provide lift for emerging market debt

    Save over 65%$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More