More stories

  • in

    Vice Media files for bankruptcy to enable sale to lenders including Soros and Fortress

    The lender consortium includes Fortress Investment, Soros Fund Management and Monroe Capital.
    It will provide $225 million in the form of a credit bid for most of Vice Media’s assets, the company announced on Monday, along with significant liabilities.
    Vice filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

    Vice Media offices display the Vice logo in Venice, California.
    Mario Tama | Getty Images

    Once a digital media darling, Vice Media Group on Monday filed for bankruptcy protection after years of financial troubles.
    A consortium of Vice’s lenders which includes Fortress Investment, Soros Fund Management and Monroe Capital is looking to acquire the company following the filing.

    The digital media trailblazer, once valued at $5.7 billion and known for sites including Vice and Motherboard, had been restructuring and cutting jobs across its global news business over recent months.
    The group set to buy the company will provide $225 million in the form of a credit bid for most of Vice Media’s assets, the company announced on Monday, along with significant liabilities.
    Vice is one of several digital media and technology firms forced to restructure this year amid a sluggish economy and weak advertising market. Buzzfeed last month shuttered its news division and announced substantial layoffs.
    Launched in Canada in 1994 as a fringe magazine, Vice expanded around the world with youth-focused content and a prominent social media presence. It endured several years of financial troubles, however, as tech giants such as Google and Meta vacuumed up global ad spend.
    To facilitate its sale, Vice filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. If the application is approved, other parties will be able to bid for the company. Credit bids enable creditors to swap secured debt for company assets rather than pay cash.

    The consortium’s bid includes a commitment of $20 million in cash to enable Vice’s operations to continue throughout the sale process. It is expected to conclude within two to three months, the company said.
    Vice said its various multi-platform media brands including Vice News, Vice TV, Pulse Films, Virtue, Refinery29 and i-D, will continue to operate, while its international entities and Vice TV’s joint venture with A&E are not part of the Chapter 11 filing.
    Vice Co-CEOs Bruce Dixon and Hozefa Lokhandwala said in a statement that the sale process will “strengthen the Company and position VICE for long-term growth.”
    “We will have new ownership, a simplified capital structure and the ability to operate without the legacy liabilities that have been burdening our business,” they added. More

  • in

    Fanatics to buy PointsBet’s U.S. assets for about $150 million

    Fanatics agreed to buy the U.S. operations of sports betting company PointsBet.
    The deal values the assets at about $150 million.
    The agreement marks a big leap into sports gambling for Fanatics.

    Fanatics logo is seen on the dugout wall before the game between the Pittsburgh Pirates and the Milwaukee Brewers at PNC Park on July 3, 2022 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Justin Berl/Getty Images)
    Justin Berl | Getty Images

    Fanatics has agreed to acquire the U.S. operations of PointsBet, marking the sports giant’s first major leap into U.S. sports betting.
    The deal is worth about $150 million in cash. The companies announced the deal Sunday night soon after CNBC reported an agreement was reached.

    “Fanatics and PointsBet are excited to enter into an agreement for Fanatics Betting and Gaming to acquire PointsBet’s U.S. business,” the companies said in a joint statement. “While there are still several steps in the process to complete the acquisition, both parties are confident in the outcome. Fanatics Betting and Gaming and PointsBet will provide further details of the proposed deal and timely updates in the coming weeks.”
    Fanatics will gain access to at least 15 states with the deal, according to people familiar with the deal who declined to be named because discussions were private. Fanatics expects to have access to the majority of states where PointsBet operates by the start of the NFL season, according to one of the people.
    PointsBet, whose shares are traded in Australia, is expected to hold a shareholder vote on the deal in late June. Only PointsBet’s U.S. assets are part of the deal. Fanatics will plan to fund some of the remaining cash flow burn from PointsBet, which has had to spend heavily on marketing to compete with larger rivals DraftKings and FanDuel.
    PointsBet forecast a loss of between $77 million and $82 million for the second half of the year. Citing “very challenging” market conditions, the company said Sunday that it would need to raise additional capital at a “significant discount to recent market prices” in the near term if the deal with Fanatics somehow fell apart.
    NBCUniversal will get proceeds from its previous deal with PointsBet and will no longer have an equity stake. NBC acquired a 4.9% equity stake in PointsBet in 2020.

    Fanatics has been in talks with a number of different sports betting companies over the past year as it has plotted its path forward in mobile gambling.
    “This is a 10-year journey,” Matt King, the CEO of Fanatics Betting, said at the SBC Conference earlier this month. “We’re going to move very methodically through that 10-year journey. And by doing that and taking that approach, it allows you to be a bit more considered in your decisions. You can kind of move slower, slightly slower today, in order to move fast later.”
    Fanatics is a sports platform company with a private valuation of $31 billion. The company has forecast 2023 revenue of $8 billion.
    Fanatics owns commerce assets, a sports trading card business, and is building out a sports betting division. The company acquired legendary trading card company Topps for $500 million last year.
    Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of NBC Sports and CNBC. More

  • in

    Crypto companies are playing poker with the SEC as agency cracks down on the industry

    Crypto companies have issued bold threats to leave the U.S., highlighting concern that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s industry crackdown is becoming too harsh.
    They’re playing a game of poker with the SEC, testing the limits of their lobbying power in the hope that they can get it to back down.
    But whether they’ll leave or not is debatable — the U.S. is a huge market with over 50 million Americans owning crypto.

    Major players are hoping that the SEC and Washington takes, what crypto watchers see as bluffs, seriously and soften the hard line that regulators have taken on the industry.
    Roman Strelchenko | 500Px Plus | Getty Images

    Cryptocurrency companies are playing a game of poker with the Securities and Exchange Commission, making bold threats to leave the U.S. as the regulator steps up pressure on the industry to toe the line.
    Major players are hoping that the SEC and Washington takes, what crypto watchers see as bluffs, seriously and soften the hard line that regulators have taken on the industry.

    Executives at firms including crypto exchange Coinbase and blockchain services company Ripple have piled on with comments laying into the SEC and signaling plans to shift business overseas, in a bid to rally support and send a message to U.S. politicians concerned that the country may miss out on a key technological innovation.
    Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said last week that the SEC was on a “lone crusade” with its tough actions against certain crypto companies. He added that Chair Gary Gensler had taken an “anti-crypto view,” despite earlier being a supporter of the industry during his time as an economics professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
    “The SEC is a bit of an outlier here,” Armstrong told CNBC’s Dan Murphy in an interview in Dubai. “I don’t think [Gensler is] necessarily trying to regulate the industry as much as maybe curtail it. But he’s created some lawsuits, and I think it’s quite unhelpful for the industry in the U.S. writ large.”
    Brad Garlinghouse, CEO of Ripple, also tore into the SEC this week. When asked for his message to Gensler as the company announced an expansion into Dubai, he quipped, “Who?” before later saying Ripple will have spent $200 million defending itself against a lawsuit initiated by the regulator by the time it is over.
    “I find it as a company that started in the United States and as somebody who is a U.S. citizen, it’s sad. I have sadness about this. The U.S. is getting passed not just by a little bit but by a lot,” Garlinghouse said.

    “The tough thing about this is you have a country that I think has put politics ahead of policy and that’s not a good decision if you’re trying to invest in the economy.”

    Dubai and Europe have proven to be much more favorable markets with their virtual asset regulatory frameworks, Garlinghouse said, adding: “The United States is definitely stuck.”
    Garlinghouse, Armstrong and other crypto bosses have made threats to leave the U.S., highlighting concern from the industry that the SEC’s crackdown is becoming too harsh. The regulator has taken strong enforcement actions against companies including Ripple, Coinbase, Kraken and Paxos, accusing each of flouting securities laws.
    The SEC’s contention is that most tokens in the market may qualify as securities, which would subject them to much stricter requirements around registration and disclosure. Crypto firms, naturally, have denied assets they issue or list on their platforms should be treated as securities.

    Will they stay or will they go?

    The question is: could they actually leave? It looks pretty unlikely.
    “The U.S. is one of the largest markets for crypto, and hence it is highly unlikely that they will leave,” Larisa Yarovaya, associate professor of finance at Southampton University, told CNBC via email.
    “The biggest fear of crypto companies is that regulation will cause panic among crypto investors and prices will go down. To look confident (even arrogant) is a common tactic of crypto company CEOs. They think this will translate into investors’ confidence, overconfidence in some cases, and will encourage further irrational behaviour among investors, e.g. HODL [hold on for dear life] even when markets are falling.”
    Ripple’s Garlinghouse has been threatening to move his company’s headquarters overseas since 2020. In October that year, he said the U.K., Switzerland, Singapore, Japan and the United Arab Emirates were under consideration for Ripple’s potential move abroad.
    That hasn’t happened yet.
    Coinbase’s chief, meanwhile, suggested at a London fintech conference in April that the firm would consider options of investing more abroad, including relocating from the U.S. to elsewhere, if the exchange doesn’t get regulatory clarity in the U.S.
    A month later, Armstrong said Coinbase “is not going to relocate overseas.”

    “We’re always going to have a U.S. presence … But the U.S. is a little bit behind right now,” he told CNBC.
    The U.S. is a huge market for the industry, with over 50 million Americans saying they own some crypto, according to a survey conducted by Morning Consult for Coinbase.
    “There’s a much greater focus on the international markets for those firms. But at the top end of the market, personally I just can’t see that ever happening that you leave the United States market completely,” Jonathan Levin, co-founder of Chainalysis, told CNBC in an interview in London.
    “It’s more about how much do you invest in new international expansion where maybe that wasn’t as high up on the agenda, but now it’s let’s look at France, let’s look at the U.K.”
    On top of this, the practicalities of moving these already large companies out of the U.S. would be tough.
    “Although these industries are virtual by their nature, they still need people, and people have families, mortgages, and preferences on where they live. Replacing them with local talent in the new place may be easier said than done,” George Weston, a partner at global offshore law firm Harneys, told CNBC via email.

    Regulatory certainty outside the U.S.

    Crypto bosses are playing up to some officials’ concerns that the U.S. has become shrouded in regulatory uncertainty while other jurisdictions, like the European Union and U.K., have charged forward with proposed regulatory frameworks for digital assets.
    Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the SEC, said at a Financial Times conference last week that the U.S. was “shooting ourselves in the foot by not having a regulatory regime in the U.S.”
    She praised the EU on its progress with waving through laws for the crypto industry.
    The EU is expected to bring in the first comprehensive set of regulations for digital assets, known as Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA), sometime in 2024.
    “It’s really commendable that Europe was able to get that done so quickly,” Peirce said, according to Reuters. “If we built a good regulatory regime, people would come. I think you will see that with MiCA.”
    Diego Ballo Ossio, a partner at law firm Clifford Chance, said other jurisdictions including the U.K. and EU are changing their legislative frameworks to create clear regulatory regimes for exchanges.

    “This means that other countries are effectively providing US based exchanges an option – a place to move to. It is not unthinkable that a U.S. exchange decided to create operational hubs in non-U.S. jurisdictions where the product can be safely innovated and enhanced,” he told CNBC.
    Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, recently said it has become more difficult for the company to operate into the U.S. and that it was minded to establish a regulated operation in the U.K.
    Patrick Hillman, the company’s chief strategy officer, said the U.S. “has been very confusing over the past six months,” pointing to the SEC’s actions against Coinbase as a sign of how the country is in a “weird place.”
    While the U.S. crypto industry might currently be throwing out empty threats right now, there could be a real issue if regulators in America don’t move forward with thoughtful regulation.
    “My conclusion is that I think it is more sabre rattling than a genuine desire to up and leave the U.S., but if the SEC continues down the path it is on, many firms will have no choice but to try another way of doing business. It is existential,” Daniel Csefalvay, a partner at BCLP law firm, told CNBC via email. More

  • in

    China’s recovery lifts U.S. companies’ sales as domestic consumers pull back spending

    Many U.S. companies said China’s recovery helped their quarterly sales, but demand hasn’t snapped back as quickly as expected for some.
    Starbucks, Disney, MGM Resorts and Procter & Gamble are among the companies that reported a boost to their China sales.
    But companies are still waiting to see the same recovery in travel retail.

    Pedestrians walk past Yum! Brands Inc. Pizza Hut and KFC restaurants in Shanghai, China.
    Qilai Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    China is leaving behind pandemic lockdowns, and U.S. companies like Procter & Gamble, Starbucks and MGM Resorts International say the country’s recovery is boosting their overall sales as consumers in their home markets watch their wallets.
    With its large population and swelling middle class, China is a desirable market for many multinational companies that have seen their U.S. businesses mature. But its zero-Covid policy, which imposed harsh restrictions to stop the spread of the virus, hurt the country’s economy — and revenue for the many U.S. companies that sell their goods or services there.

    After rolling back the policy in December, China’s economy grew 4.5% in the first quarter. U.S. companies are reporting that demand in China is returning, boosting their sales at a time when many U.S. consumers are pulling back their spending.
    However, the recovery hasn’t been as swift or dramatic as many investors hoped. Most companies are still waiting to surpass pre-pandemic sales in China. The travel retail segment is taking even longer to bounce back. And Apple’s sales fell in its China region, which includes the mainland, Hong Kong and the nearby self-governing island of Taiwan.
    Morgan Stanley analyst Kelly Kim wrote in a research note that the firm’s China consumer team expects that recovery will come in three stages: a spring break in February through April, summer “revenge spending” in May through July, and a stable recovery starting in August.

    Restaurants rebound

    U.S.-based restaurants were among the companies that saw demand return in China. But sales haven’t snapped back to 2019 levels just yet.
    Starbucks reported that its same-store sales in China rose 3% in its latest quarter, reversing their declines. Some Wall Street analysts were still anticipating shrinking same-store sales for the company’s second-largest market.

    A year earlier, the coffee giant suspended its outlook for the year, citing lockdowns in China as one of the reasons for the decision. That quarter, Starbucks’ same-store sales in China sank 23%.
    Yum China, Yum Brands’ master franchisee in China, also said its same-store sales grew 8% in the first quarter. China is KFC’s largest market and Pizza Hut’s second largest.
    “We benefited from increasing mobility and saw a 40%-plus growth at transportation and tourist levels. However, same-store sales at these locations in the first quarter were still 20% to 30% below 2019 levels,” Yum China CEO Joey Wat told analysts on the company’s conference call.

    Travel boosts parks and casinos

    Tourists pose for a photo at the Shanghai Disney Resort as the resort kicked off a month of festivities from January 13 to February 10 to celebrate the upcoming Chinese New Year.
    China News Service | China News Service | Getty Images

    Chinese consumers also appear to be traveling again as restrictions lift, visiting theme parks and casinos. The increase in travel and leisure spending helped a range of U.S. companies at the start of the year.
    Disney touted “improved financial results” at its Shanghai and Hong Kong resorts.
    “We’ve been really gratified to see the bounce-back from the pandemic closures that we had,” Disney CFO Christine McCarthy told analysts Wednesday on the company’s conference call.
    Macao, the world’s biggest gambling hub, has seen a resurgence of tourists after testing requirements for inbound travelers from the mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan were dropped. Tourism peaked over the Lunar New Year holiday in late January.
    MGM Resorts International operates MGM Cotai and MGM Macau venues in the region. Earlier this month, the casino giant reported a swift return to profitability as foot traffic at its Chinese casinos reaches pre-pandemic levels. In the first quarter, its properties in China generated adjusted earnings of $169 million, or 88% of the division’s adjusted earnings four years earlier.
    Airbnb said for its latest quarter its Asia-Pacific division saw its biggest year-over-year growth for nights and experiences booked. The company closed its domestic China business in 2022, shutting down all mainland listings to focus on helping Chinese consumers find lodging abroad instead.
    “We are encouraged by China’s recent lifting of its travel restrictions even though we anticipate the outbound recovery to be gradual due to challenges with limited flight capacities,” the company wrote in its quarterly letter to shareholders.
    While many U.S.-based businesses are benefiting from China’s rebound, companies are still waiting to see the same recovery in travel retail.
    SK-II, a luxury skin-care brand owned by Procter & Gamble, has seen its sales bounce back in China, with the notable exception of its travel retail segment. Overall, Procter & Gamble’s organic sales rose 2% in China. As consumer mobility rises, the consumer packaged goods giant expects revenue to rebound even more.
    Scott Roe, chief financial officer of Tapestry, the parent of Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman, said Thursday that the company has begun to see an uptick in domestic Chinese travel, including in Hong Kong and Macao. Yet, he added that global Chinese tourism is below pre-pandemic levels — and said that the potential for more travel could bring opportunity ahead.
    In its greater China unit, Tapestry expects a mid-single-digit gain in revenue for the fiscal year, including an expected increase of about 50% in the next quarter. The company’s sales momentum in China is helping offset weakness in the U.S., as North American consumers become more cautious.
    Though many businesses have struggled with travel retail in China, at least one company is already seeing its sales at duty free shops and tourist destinations bounce back.
    Beauty giant Coty said it’s seen consumer traffic return to retailers, and pointed to more flights to the tropical island and shopping district Hainan, where it has dozens of stores. The French-American company owns Covergirl, Kylie Jenner’s beauty lines, and a slew of designer perfume and cosmetics brands. Coty’s travel retail sales climbed more than 30% in the quarter.
    A glut of inventory weighed on Coty’s China sales in its latest quarter, but April’s sales were still higher than both the year-ago period and two years prior.
    Piper Sandler analyst Korinne Wolfmeyer called the company one of her favorite beauty stocks in a note to clients following Coty’s quarterly earnings report. She in part cited its China performance.
    “We are remaining cautiously optimistic on China for the beauty market in the near term, but for COTY specifically, we view the company’s strategic investments in the region and key product launches as a driver of market outperformance,” she wrote.
    — CNBC’s Melissa Repko and Stefan Sykes contributed reporting for this story. More

  • in

    In Chinatowns across the U.S., tradition and history collide with luxury development

    In major Chinatowns, luxury development and public-use projects have altered the fabric of these historic communities.
    The changes in Chinatowns across the country look similar, though they’re unfolding on different timelines and at different magnitudes.
    CNBC spoke with more than two dozen residents, activists and restaurant owners in Chinatowns across the U.S.

    Just a few hundred people of Chinese heritage still live in Washington, D.C.’s Chinatown. Many have been pushed out to cheaper and safer areas.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Penny and Jack Lee, now married, grew up in the 1960s and 1970s among the thousands of people of Chinese heritage who lived in apartments lining the main stretches of Washington, D.C.’s bustling Chinatown.
    “Chinatown was very bright, vibrant,” Jack Lee recalled. “All of our recreations ended up being in the alleys of Chinatown.” They felt it was a safe haven, he said.

    related investing news

    2 hours ago

    But the neighborhood didn’t stay the same for long. First came a convention center in 1982 that displaced many in the majority Chinese community. Then, in 1997, came the MCI Center, now Capital One Arena, a few blocks from the heart of the neighborhood. These developments, as well as luxury condos, caused rents to rise and forced grocery stores and restaurants to close. They also pushed residents to move to safer and cheaper areas, Penny Lee said.
    Just a few hundred people of Chinese heritage still live in the neighborhood, mostly in Section 8 apartments for lower-income residents. There are now fewer than a dozen Chinese restaurants, as well as the long-standing Chinatown gate and non-Chinese businesses with signs bearing Chinese characters. Jokingly called the “Chinatown Block,” reflecting its diminished size, what’s left of the neighborhood is mere blocks from a wealthier area that contains the U.S. Capitol and the National Mall.
    Chinatowns across the nation face a similar reckoning. In major Chinatown neighborhoods, luxury development and public-use projects have altered the fabric of these historic communities, according to more than two dozen activists, residents and restaurant owners. While some argue these developments accelerate local economies, many interviewed by CNBC say they destroy the neighborhoods’ character and push out longtime residents.
    Some Chinatown residents benefited from the development boom, selling properties to developers or drawing more customers from increased foot traffic. Many others, meanwhile, have been driven out by higher rents, limited parking and increasingly unsafe conditions.
    The changes in Chinatowns across the country look similar, though they’re unfolding at different timelines and magnitudes. Chicago’s Chinatown, in comparison with other Chinatowns with shrinking populations, more than doubled its Chinese population between 1990 and 2020.

    “Those who are interested in preserving D.C. Chinatown should look toward its intrinsic value to tell the Chinese American story, the American story,” said Evelyn Moy, president of the Moy Family Association, which provides education and assistance to residents in Washington, D.C.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Cities already deeply affected by gentrification and high-end development stand as templates for how the shift may unfold elsewhere. For many, housing is the problem — and the solution.
    “We can’t build our way out of the housing crisis, but we can’t get out of the housing crisis without building,” said Ener Chiu, executive vice president of community building at East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation in California, which has built 2,300 permanently affordable homes in Oakland.

    A case study in the heart of Manhattan

    In Manhattan’s Chinatown, which dates back to the late 1800s, residents and local organizations said there are two interrelated fights: one against luxury development, and another to build more affordable housing and maintain existing apartments. Some have been frustrated that money and government support have gone toward skyscrapers and not the longtime residents who still struggle to secure housing in the neighborhood.
    Opponents say tall, modern buildings — such as One Manhattan Square, a 72-story residential skyscraper in nearby Two Bridges developed by Extell Development Group, which features units priced at over $1.2 million — will affect surrounding property values, the structure of neighboring buildings and the percentage of Asian residents in Chinatown.

    Opponents say tall, modern buildings such as One Manhattan Square affect surrounding property values, the structure of neighboring buildings and the percentage of Asian residents in Chinatown.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    There are also plans to develop four more towers ranging from 62 to 77 stories, each with 25% affordable housing, by Extell, JDS Development Group, and Chetrit Group.
    City councilmember Christopher Marte and residents of the Lower East Side and Chinatown filed a lawsuit against the buildings’ developers and the city in October, arguing construction of the towers will create further environmental and health issues. The suit contends the developments violate the Green Amendment granting New York state residents the right to clean air.
    Extell and JDS Development Group did not provide comment for this story.
    Some residents have shown tentative support for the luxury buildings, saying they might make the neighborhood safer or bring in wealthier Asian residents who could boost Chinatown’s economy. Most who spoke with CNBC, however, expressed frustration over the rapid development of these megaprojects.
    The Two Bridges fight is an experiment in looking out for residents’ livelihoods while “fighting against a very anti-humanity way of seeing a city,” said Alina Shen, the lead Chinatown Tenants Union organizer at grassroots community organization CAAAV: Organizing Asian Communities. “It’s a response to the fact that people who remain in Chinatown feel a deep pessimism for what’s happening and from literally being in the shadow of a ledge of a mega tower.”
    The struggle with luxury developers has also involved the fight for secure housing.

    Manhattan Chinatown’s housing stock is “really aged,” which has led to costly fires, according to Thomas Yu, executive director of Asian Americans for Equality.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Chinatown’s housing stock is “really aged,” but sparse vacant land has made creating affordable housing difficult, said Thomas Yu, executive director of Asian Americans for Equality, which has created more than 800 affordable housing units citywide. The development process for new units can take years, he said, and developers have rapidly sought out Manhattan’s Chinatown as the borough’s “last place with huge potential returns.”
    Evictions, buyouts and deregulation of rent-stabilized housing have contributed to Chinatown’s population decline and illegal sublet situations, according to Yu.
    Chen Yun, a tenant leader for CAAAV, said she had a landlord who for years refused to repair heating and hot water. She said she and her husband would boil pots of water at work and bring them home to bathe. They also dealt with a collapsed ceiling, she said. Yun spoke in Mandarin, translated by Shen and CAAAV communications manager Irene Hsu.
    In 2005, Yun helped grow the Chinatown Tenants Union to help residents fight landlords and report faulty conditions. However, residents continue reporting similar housing issues, which Yun said has pushed some onto the streets, and more residents have mobilized to oppose developments they say could exacerbate these issues.
    “No matter how beautiful or well-built these buildings are, [residents] simply can’t afford it, it’s not within their means, and these luxury buildings have nothing to do with us,” said Yun, who lost her job during the pandemic and spends much of her retirement money on rent.
    Yu, of Asian Americans for Equality, said his organization is not against development but that more affordable housing should go up instead of solely market-rate buildings. Asian Americans have among the highest citywide poverty levels and have poor odds of finding secure housing, Yu said.
    Some argue luxury development is eliminating affordable housing opportunities by sheer proximity, as one of Chinatown’s ZIP codes was excluded from a city loan program for low-income areas since it also included the wealthy Soho and Tribeca neighborhoods.

    In Manhattan’s Chinatown, residents and local organizations said there are two interrelated fights: one against luxury development, and another to build more affordable housing and maintain existing apartments.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Some residents expressed feeling an intense divide between their local government and Chinatown — fueled in part by rezoning debates, not to mention a proposed $8.3 billion 40-story jail in the neighborhood.
    Zishun Ning of the Chinatown Working Group has led protests against the proposed jail, as well as against the Museum of Chinese in America, which stands to benefit from the jail’s expansion via a $35 million government investment. Ning said the city government’s “big development” agenda has “pitted us against each other.”
    The museum’s leaders said they’ve been scapegoated, as they weren’t included in development talks with the city but could not turn down the money.

    Moving out

    For many Chinatown residents, rising rents and sparse affordable housing have left them with one choice: moving away. But challenges often follow residents, and once they resettle, some face familiar changes.

    Maggie Chen, a receptionist in Boston who has lived in an affordable housing development for eight years, said rising rents have made her reconsider whether living in Chinatown is economical.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Many Chinese residents have relocated from Boston’s Chinatown to the nearby suburbs of Malden and Quincy, said Angie Liou, executive director of Boston’s Asian Community Development Corporation. Luxury buildings have opened in these suburban satellite Chinatowns as developers look to capitalize on less developed parts of the city, pushing residents further away.
    In Manhattan, a woman with the surname Yang, who requested partial anonymity to preserve her privacy, said she had lived in a $1,100-per-month Chinatown apartment, which her family could no longer afford due to increasing rent. After applying for public housing through the NYC Housing Authority, she moved eight miles away in 2009 into a $400-per-month apartment in East Harlem.
    “It was a hard readjustment period just because my life is even to this day still tied to Chinatown, so the train commute is an extra hour,” Yang said. She spoke in Fujianese, with translation by Ling Ren, Asian Americans For Equality’s manager of residential services.

    Some Chinatown residents have looked to the suburbs for cheaper rent, lower maintenance costs and better parking, said Patty Moy, manager of China Pearl Restaurant, which has locations in Boston and Quincy, Massachusetts.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Yang said she still goes downtown each week for doctor’s appointments and groceries. She found several other people of Chinese heritage living in her new neighborhood with whom she waits in food pantry lines, some of whom have also relocated from downtown Manhattan, she said.
    Other displaced members of New York’s Chinese community have relocated to Flushing, Queens, a hotbed for condominium and affordable housing developments.
    Though communities such as Flushing have long appealed to residents across many socioeconomic backgrounds, it’s recently attracted wealthier residents moving into new developments.

    “One of the unique aspects of Flushing is what I call the 15-minute neighborhood, the idea that you can live, work, play, go to school, partake in open space, shop, sort of all within 15 minutes,” said Ross Moskowitz, partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, who represents several developers’ projects in the neighborhood.
    And as more people move in, rents go up, meaning many residents who relocated to Flushing for cheaper rent have found themselves in the same battles with developers that they fled from, according to Jo-Ann Yoo, executive director of Asian American Federation.

    Chinatowns and the pandemic

    Many debates surrounding luxury development and affordable housing were accelerated by the pandemic, which shuttered hundreds of businesses across Chinatowns. After experiencing xenophobia and discrimination fueled by anti-Chinese sentiment during the pandemic, many people stopped coming to Chinatowns and frequenting restaurants, clothing stores and art shops. Local families were forced to restrict spending, and some businesses had to cut staff and hours.
    Some businesses in Oakland have been unable to build back after looting and anti-Asian attacks on public transit caused many residents to fear going out after dark, said Evelyn Lee, former president of the board of directors at Oakland Asian Cultural Center. This has contributed to reduced pedestrian traffic in Chinatown, she said.

    Manhattan Chinatown native David Leung took over Wo Hop Restaurant in 2016. Leung reduced his restaurant’s hours in 2020 during the Covid pandemic and watched as storefronts emptied.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    In Manhattan, Chinatown native David Leung, who took over Wo Hop Restaurant in 2016, remembers old-school factories making tofu and small grocery stores that recently closed. Amid rising anti-Asian sentiment and the pandemic’s harsh economic impact, Leung reduced his restaurant’s hours and watched as storefronts emptied.
    “There are so many stories about Chinese restaurants around for decades, and now they’ve gotten replaced by modern types like tea shops or pastry shops,” Leung said. “Chinatown is still an Asian community, I guess, but it’s a lot more mixed than it used to be decades ago.”
    To assist struggling small businesses, nonprofit organization Welcome to Chinatown distributed over $750,000 in small business grants throughout the community through its Longevity Fund, its co-founder Vic Lee said. Send Chinatown Love, which provides relief and growth efforts, raised over $1.1 million for the neighborhood and directly supported 59 merchants, according to its website.

    Mei Lum is the fifth-generation owner of Wing on Wo & Co., the oldest operating store in Manhattan’s Chinatown, as well as the founder of the W.O.W. Project. She said there isn’t a robust next generation to “really problem-solve and think through these circumstantial, political, and contextual issues arising in the neighborhood.”
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Still, many small businesses are threatened by the changes. The new generation hasn’t frequented restaurants such as Hop Lee as often as older clientele due to differences in taste, said the restaurant’s owner, Johnny Mui.
    “A lot of our businesses now, they’re more for a higher income bracket, and it’s just growing over the years slowly,” said Carry Pak, a Chinatown resident and CAAAV youth leader. “Having spaces where the immigrant community can still feel comfortable with being able to speak the language to street vendors or grocery vendors is particularly key.”

    The stadium debate

    Another common issue facing Chinatowns: sports arenas and other public-use venues. Some argue stadiums can provide Chinatowns with more foot traffic and opportunities, though others say they have historically destroyed homes and attracted chain businesses that outcompete Chinatown businesses.
    Plans for a new Oakland Athletics ballpark a mile from the city’s Chinatown, which prompted concerns from residents, fell through last month after the team purchased land for a new stadium in Las Vegas.
    In Philadelphia, plans for a new arena have irked some Chinatown residents and business owners, who say developers and city governments have neglected the community’s needs.

    “We as a community need to be opposing it as much as possible in case there’s legs to this idea that the arena is going to be built,” said John Chin, executive director of the Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corporation.
    Pia Singh | CNBC

    A proposed $1.3 billion Sixers arena would sit blocks from the city’s Chinatown Friendship Gate. The privately funded arena is in the first stages of construction. Developers are working on gaining entitlements and approvals as the project moves toward its scheduled September 2031 opening date.
    The development team expects the 18,000-seat arena to be a “major economic driver” for Philadelphians, projecting $400 million of annual economic output and 1,000 jobs.
    Since the proposal was made public last summer, several Chinatown community members and residents petitioned the developers and city leaders to shutter the project. Experts previously said professional sports stadiums fail to generate significant local economic growth, and tax revenue is insufficient to make positive financial contributions.
    The owner of Little Saigon Cafe in Philly’s Chinatown, a man known as “Uncle Sam,” leads a coalition of more than 40 association leaders against the arena development. Uncle Sam, a Vietnamese refugee, came to the city more than four decades ago.
    “If the arena is built, it will destroy a community, destroy our culture,” he said.

    “We’ll fight to the end. We’ll do everything we can to defeat this [arena] project,” said “Uncle Sam,” the owner of Little Saigon Cafe in Philadelphia’s Chinatown.
    Pia Singh | CNBC

    Private and government-led investments in public spaces have pushed out lower-income residents, said John Chin, executive director of the Philadelphia Chinatown Development Corp. His organization empowers native Chinese speakers to voice their opinions to Chinatown’s elected officials, city representatives and Sixers development heads.
    The Sixers did not respond to a request for comment on how the development would impact Chinatown.
    Last month, Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney announced the city would conduct an independent study on the arena’s impact on the community.

    Staying alive — and growing

    Many Chinatowns have struggled to secure government support while they contend with tough conditions in the economy and the real estate market.
    Yet some Chinatown leaders remain optimistic they can work with developers to maintain the neighborhoods’ character. Some leaders doubled down on fighting developers to preserve historic architecture and businesses, while others embraced development to grow opportunities for residents.

    Business owners in San Francisco’s Chinatown who spoke with CNBC said the neighborhood’s businesses, though still recovering, are keeping the city’s culture alive.
    Rebecca Smith | CNBC

    San Francisco Chinatown’s more than 14,000 residents, many of whom are low-income and elderly, have faced housing shortages. Modern businesses are taking over decades-old shops.
    However, business owners who spoke with CNBC said Chinatown’s businesses, though still recovering, are keeping the city’s culture alive.
    George Chen, who owns the contemporary Chinese restaurant China Live, remains optimistic about getting San Francisco’s Chinatown back to its heyday.
    “You can look from my roof and go see pretty much the 22 blocks of Chinatown, and I think there’s a cultural relevance to keeping the immigrant story alive,” Chen said.
    At least one U.S. Chinatown has grown while others shrink.
    The Asian population of Chicago’s Chinatown has more than doubled in three decades, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Many new residents are Fujianese from Southeast China and have driven new restaurants, buildings and support services.
    Paul Luu, CEO of Chicago’s Chinese American Service League, said families have moved from other Chinatowns to Chicago’s to take advantage of the city’s nonprofits and the growing local job market. He added that its distance from the pricier South Loop makes prices cheaper than in other cities.

    The Asian population in Chicago’s Chinatown has more than doubled in three decades, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
    Noah Sheidlower | CNBC

    Despite the growth, Chicago’s Chinatown is facing some of the same issues as those in other cities.
    Some residents have expressed concerns about a $7 billion development called The 78, which will include high-rises, residential towers, office buildings and a riverwalk to the north of Chinatown. Some fear The 78 would raise rents and property taxes, as well as push out local businesses and residents.
    Luu said The 78’s leadership team approached Chinatown leaders early in development to hear concerns and work to establish more affordable and accessible housing and commerce.
    As high-end development occurs in the right locations, it can promote the local economy and encourage progress, said Homan Wong, an architect on the board of directors for the Chicago Chinatown Chamber of Commerce. He said issues of parking and safety still hurt Chicago’s Chinatown but that the Chamber remains focused on working with developers to keep the community growing.
    “The opposite of development would be decay,” he said. “The reality is that if you don’t move forward, you’re going to fall behind.”
    — Noah Sheidlower reported from Boston, Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C. Pia Singh reported from Philadelphia. CNBC’s Rebecca Smith contributed reporting from San Francisco. More

  • in

    Major natural gas investor sees signs prices are bottoming

    The investor who ran the country’s biggest natural gas ETF said he believes prices have hit bottom.
    John Love, who managed the United States Natural Gas Fund, cites global demand and production dynamics for his bull case.

    “They’re [producers] looking to the future,” the U.S. Commodity Funds CEO told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “This huge export opportunity that’s growing is really what they’ve got their eyes on.”
    Producers are coming off a rough span. Natural gas prices rose 6% this week and just notched their fourth positive week in five.
    “We basically had a period coming out of Covid where things were looking pretty good for natural gas, and then you have this potential supply shock,” he said. “And then, that didn’t materialize.”
    Russia reduced energy flows to Europe ahead of last winter. Since then, several European countries including Germany have announced new LNG, or liquefied natural gas, projects or are expanding existing ones to reduce their dependence on natural gas exports.
    Teucrium Trading CEO Sal Gilbertie said he believes natural gas has been trying to build a bottom over the past four to six weeks. According to Gilbertie, it sets the stage for a potential rally.

    “You’ve got LNG plants coming back online that were off,” he said. “Natural gas actually looks pretty stable.”
    Gilbertie, whose firm focuses on the U.S. agriculture market, also points to a bullish seasonal trend.
    “The demand in the U.S. for peaking units for summertime heat is going to pick up,” he added.

    Disclaimer More

  • in

    Automakers find a tax credit loophole to increase EV leasing and boost sales

    Most EVs for sale today do not qualify for the full federal tax credit under the Inflation Reduction Act because of where the vehicles or components are built.
    But leasing the vehicles can save drivers thousands of dollars.
    Hyundai, Kia and Ford say they will look to increase leasing on their EVs to lower the pricing and increase sales.

    Dave Walters of Orange County, California, stands by his newly leased Hyundai Ioniq 5 electric vehicle.
    Provided by Dave Walters

    Fed up with high gas prices and enticed by federal tax credits, Dave Walters decided he wanted an all-electric Hyundai Ioniq 5 for his next vehicle.
    The Orange County, California, resident initially thought about purchasing a used model, until he learned he could lease the vehicle and take advantage of a key loophole under the Inflation Reduction Act.

    Buying a used Ioniq, which is produced in South Korea and Indonesia, wouldn’t earn him $7,500 off through a federal tax credit. Leasing the vehicle would.
    “I ran the numbers — what it would be without the leasing credit and with the leasing credit — and that kind of put me over the top and that was the main thing of why I went in that direction,” he said. “It was a few hundred dollars less a month.”
    Walters is exactly the kind of consumer Hyundai Motor and other automakers have started to target for EV leases to capitalize on a loophole in the IRA that allows vehicles produced outside North America to qualify for the credits. It’s something lawmakers such as U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., intended the rules to block.
    Under the IRA, leasing is categorized as commercial business and therefore exempt from regulations that require the vehicle and battery components to be made in North America. Most EVs for sale today do not qualify for the full tax credit because of where the vehicles or components are built.

    Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V., talks with fellow legislators on the House floor before a joint meeting of Congress at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, April 27, 2023.
    Elizabeth Frantz | Reuters

    But leasing could save drivers thousands, as long as the companies receiving the credits pass the savings on to consumers.

    “I’m not surprised that the manufacturers are saying that they’re going to do more leasing,” said Charlie Chesbrough, Cox Automotive senior economist. “The IRA rolling on EVs and allowing them to qualify for that $7,500 really is a game-changer, and that makes a huge impact on our monthly payment.”
    For a $50,000 EV and a 36-month lease, Chesbrough estimates the full $7,500 tax credit equates to $222 in monthly savings for a consumer.
    Auto research firm Edmunds reports about 37% of EVs bought in April were leased, up from 25% during the first quarter and 13% last year.
    “It kind of creates a loophole for automakers to target more affluent customers who are probably more likely to be able to afford and actually get approved to buy an EV,” said Jessica Caldwell, Edmunds executive director of insights. “It also allows them to level the playing field against competitors who get the full tax credit when purchasing.”
    The percentage of Hyundai Ioniq 5 vehicles that are leased spiked from about 2% to begin this year to more than 30% in April, according to Hyundai Motor America CEO Randy Parker. Starting this month, the company is offering a $499-a-month leasing deal for the vehicle — lower than the industry’s average lease payment of $577, according to Edmunds.

    The Kia EV6 on display at the New York Auto Show, April 13, 2022.
    Scott Mlyn | CNBC

    “We want to continue to push and highlight leasing as much as we can so we can continue to take advantage of the tax credit and consumers can take advantage of the tax credit,” Parker told CNBC. “Right now, that’s how the cards have been dealt.”
    Kia and Ford also say they will look to increase leasing on their EVs to lower the pricing and increase sales.
    Kia expects to increase its EV leasing from below 15% now to as high as 40% in the coming months, Watson said. Like Hyundai, Kia is offering a $499 leasing deal for its EV6 with a $4,999 initial down payment.
    “For the next several years, Kia is going to have to lean heavily into leasing to be able to pass along that $7,500 credit to customers. And so that’s what we intend to do,” said Eric Watson, vice president of sales operations at Kia America.
    Prior to the IRA passing, Hyundai and Kia, which are owned by the same South Korean parent company, were second in the U.S. in EV sales behind Tesla. But their sales have since fallen behind those of General Motors and Ford, both of which have vehicles that are fully or partially eligible for federal tax credits.
    Hyundai and other automakers that became ineligible for the credits under the IRA opposed the regulations, seeking a longer ease-in period for the new rules or broad exemptions based on their U.S. EV plans.
    “It gives us a lifeline. I wouldn’t call it leveling the playing field,” Watson said of leasing qualifying for the $7,500 tax credit.

    President Joe Biden stands next to a Ford Mustang Mach-E SUV during a visit to the Detroit Auto Show, to highlight electric vehicle manufacturing in America, Sept. 14, 2022.
    Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

    A Ford spokesman said the company’s credit arm is working on a leasing strategy for electric vehicles such as the Mustang Mach-E, which is produced in Mexico and currently qualifies for half the federal tax credits if purchased. The company’s electric Ford F-150 Lightning is eligible for the full $7,500.
    “We’re going to lease electric vehicles and you’ll be hearing more about that from us pretty soon,” Ford CFO John Lawler said last month.
    A spokesman for GM said the company is not changing its leasing strategy for EVs, as all of its vehicles qualify for the full tax credits. Only about 3% of GM’s EVs are leased, he said.
    While the lease terms are typically only a few years, automakers have touted EVs as drawing new customers to their brands.
    “The earlier you get these customers within your brand, especially with the new technology, I think the better chance you have to keep them,” Edmunds’ Caldwell said.
    And temporary leasing may be an attractive option for many consumers such as Walters, who traded in a 2009 Nissan Murano, as EVs remain an emerging industry with changing technologies and a significant number of new entries.
    “I wanted to kind of dip my toe into it and see if I really like it. It’s only been six weeks but it’s been really good so far,” Walters said. “I really enjoy driving it and I really enjoy not having to pay for gas.” More

  • in

    Airlines are offering more U.S.-Europe service than ever — but don’t expect bargains

    Airlines are adding U.S.-Europe flights in hopes the international travel boom will continue.
    Carriers adding flights range from large airlines like Delta to upstarts like Play and Norse Atlantic.
    Fares for international trips are up, while domestic fares have moderated.

    A traveller walks in the Terminal 2 corridors of the Roissy-Charles de Gaulle airport with Air France airplanes in the background, in the northeastern outskirts of Paris, on September 16, 2022, amid a strike of air traffic controllers.
    Julien De Rosa | AFP | Getty Images

    Flights to Europe will be plentiful this summer. Cheap airfare? Not as much.
    Airlines scheduled a near-record 51,000 flights from June through August from the U.S. to Europe, according to airline data firm Cirium. The number of scheduled seats is the highest since 2018.

    Despite that increase in capacity across the Atlantic, fares are up sharply as airlines test travelers’ appetites for trips abroad. According to Hopper, U.S.-to-Europe roundtrip flights are going for an average of $1,032, up 35% from last year and 24% from 2019. Average domestic U.S. airfare, by contrast, is down 15% from a year ago to $286 for a round trip, roughly in line with pre-pandemic levels.
    Executives at longtime operators of European service like Delta, newcomers like JetBlue, and budget upstarts like Norse Atlantic Airways and Play are all betting big that travelers will shell out for more international trips with the worst of Covid — and accompanying travel restrictions — in the rearview mirror.
    Airlines and airports have been racing to fill jobs in hopes of avoiding last summer’s chaos.
    “European travel was definitely still ramping up last summer,” said JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes in an interview with CNBC in late March. “I think a lot of people just didn’t fly last year, and now they’re looking to fly this year.”
    JetBlue is flying to London’s two largest airports from New York and Boston, and plans to launch service to Paris from New York in June. It plans to add service to Amsterdam this summer.

    Delta plans to offer a record number of seats from the U.S. to Europe, up 20% from last summer. The carrier will serve 69 markets in Europe, a spokesman said.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Airlines summer flights to Europe

    “If you are traveling during those peak summer months, you need to book now,” said Hopper’s lead economist, Hayley Berg.
    In order to avoid the highest of the high fares steer clear of national holidays, and fly midweek, she recommended.
    Some airline executives have recently noted that travelers are going back to more traditional booking patterns, which drives up fares on peak days. While airlines generally reduce capacity during less popular periods of the week or year, there could still be the chance for some more palatable prices. Airlines’ schedules from late March through the end of October show they will offer record numbers of seats for that period, data from OAG show, a sign that they could be expecting robust demand into the shoulder season.
    Berg also recommends staying open-minded about connecting trips and cautions against filtering flights for nonstops only.
    Icelandic low-cost airline Play’s flights stop at its home airport of Reykjavik, requiring travelers going on to other destinations to change flights. The carrier has been growing rapidly with its fleet of Airbus A320 and A320neos. It’s serving 39 destinations this month, up from 31 in December, the company said.
    “We’re extremely positive and bullish about the year,” said CEO Birgir Jonsson. Nearly 36% of Play’s passengers last month were connecting to other destinations through the Icelandic capital, the airline said.
    Other low-cost airlines are ramping up service between the U.S. and Europe, including Norse Atlantic Airways, which operates Boeing 787 Dreamliners. The carrier serves London Gatwick, Berlin, Paris and Oslo, Norway, and plans to launch flights to Rome next month from New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport. It’s also planning to offer London Gatwick service from a host of U.S. cities including San Francisco, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. in the coming weeks.
    Norse Atlantic’s senior vice president of communications Philip Allport said its fares for U.S.-Europe routes have been higher than usual but that the carrier is still at “the cheaper end of our direct competitors.” A round trip on Norse between New York and Paris was going for close to $1,300 for a trip departing July 1, returning a week later, lower than $1,804 on Delta, each on standard economy tickets.
    Here is how traditional and nontraditional airlines vary in their services and prices for standard economy tickets:

    Arrows pointing outwards More