More stories

  • in

    The Economist’s finance and economics internship

    The Economist is seeking promising journalists and would-be journalists to apply for the 2023 Marjorie Deane internship. The successful candidate will spend six months with us in London writing about finance and economics, and receive payment. No previous experience is required. Applicants are asked to send a CV and an original article of no more than 700 words suitable for publication in the Finance & economics section. This material should be sent to [email protected] by June 1st. ■ More

  • in

    Britain blocks Microsoft’s $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard

    The move marks a major blow for the U.S. tech giant, as it seeks to convince authorities that the deal will benefit competition.
    Shares of Activision Blizzard slumped 10% in U.S. premarket trading.

    LONDON — Britain’s top competition regulator on Wednesday moved to block Microsoft’s acquisition of video game publisher Activision Blizzard.
    The measure marks a major blow for the U.S. tech giant, as it seeks to convince authorities that the deal will benefit competition. Microsoft said it plans to appeal the decision.

    Shares of Activision Blizzard slumped nearly 10% in U.S. premarket trading.
    The U.K. Competition and Markets Authority said it opposed the deal as it raises competition concerns in the nascent cloud gaming market. The CMA previously held concerns about competition in games consoles being undermined but ruled out this concern in a preliminary decision in March.
    Microsoft could make Activision’s games exclusive to its cloud gaming platform, Xbox Game Pass, cutting off distribution to other key industry players, the CMA said.

    Cloud gaming is a technology that enables gamers to access games via companies’ remote servers — effectively streaming a game like you would a movie on Netflix. The technology is still in its infancy, but Microsoft is betting big on it becoming a mainstream way of playing games.
    “Allowing Microsoft to take such a strong position in the cloud gaming market just as it begins to grow rapidly would risk undermining the innovation that is crucial to the development of these opportunities,” the CMA said in a press release Wednesday.

    Microsoft offered the CMA remedies in an attempt to resolve its concerns — including “requirements governing what games must be offered by Microsoft to what platforms and on what conditions over a ten-year period.” However, the regulator rejected the proposals.
    “Given the remedy applies only to a defined set of Activision games, which can be streamed only in a defined set of cloud gaming services, provided they are purchased in a defined set of online stores, there are significant risks of disagreement and conflict between Microsoft and cloud gaming service providers, particularly over a ten-year period in a rapidly changing market,” the CMA said.

    ‘Flawed understanding of this market’

    Microsoft Vice Chair and President Brad Smith said in a statement that the company remains “fully committed to this acquisition and will appeal.”
    “The CMA’s decision rejects a pragmatic path to address competition concerns and discourages technology innovation and investment in the United Kingdom,” Smith said Wednesday.
    “We have already signed contracts to make Activision Blizzard’s popular games available on 150 million more devices, and we remain committed to reinforcing these agreements through regulatory remedies. We’re especially disappointed that after lengthy deliberations, this decision appears to reflect a flawed understanding of this market and the way the relevant cloud technology actually works.”
    Bobby Kotick, CEO of Activision Blizzard, told employees in a letter on Wednesday that the company and Microsoft have “already begun the work to appeal to the UK Competition Appeals Tribunal.”
    “We’re confident in our case because the facts are on our side: this deal is good for competition,” he said. 
    “At a time when the fields of machine learning and artificial intelligence are thriving, we know the U.K. market would benefit from Microsoft’s bench strength in both domains, as well as our ability to put those technologies to use immediately,” Kotick added. “By contrast, if the CMA’s decision holds, it would stifle investment, competition, and job creation throughout the UK gaming industry.” 
    An Activision Blizzard spokesperson said the CMA’s decision represented “a disservice to UK citizens, who face increasingly dire economic prospects.”
    “We will reassess our growth plans for the UK. Global innovators large and small will take note that – despite all its rhetoric — the UK is clearly closed for business,” the spokesperson said.
    Microsoft announced its intention to acquire Activision Blizzard in January 2022 for $69 billion, in one of the biggest deals the video game industry has seen to date.
    Executives at the Redmond, Washington-based technology giant believe the acquisition will boost its efforts in gaming by adding lucrative franchises like Call of Duty and Candy Crush Saga to its content offerings.
    However, some of Microsoft’s competitors contested the deal, concerned it may give Microsoft a tight grip on the $200 billion games market. Of particular concern was the prospect that Microsoft may shut off distribution access to Activision’s popular Call of Duty franchise for certain platforms.
    Sony, in particular, has voiced concern with Microsoft’s Activision purchase. The Japanese gaming giant fears that Microsoft could make Call of Duty exclusive to its Xbox consoles in the long run.

    Microsoft sought to allay those concerns by offering Sony, Nintendo, Nvidia and other firms 10-year agreements to continue bringing Call of Duty to their respective gaming platforms.
    Microsoft argues it wouldn’t be financially beneficial to withhold Call of Duty from PlayStation, Nintendo and other rivals given the licensing income it generates from keeping the game available on their platforms.
    Microsoft President Brad Smith told CNBC last month that the company is offering Sony the same agreement as it did Nintendo — to make Call of Duty available on PlayStation at the same time as on Xbox, with the same features. Sony still opposes the deal.
    The CMA had raised concerns with the potential for Microsoft to hinder competition in the nascent cloud gaming market via its Xbox Game Pass subscription service, which offers cloud gaming among its perks. Microsoft has committed to bring new Call of Duty titles to Xbox Game Pass on day one of its release.
    Cloud gaming, or the ability to access games via PC or mobile devices over the internet, is still in its infancy and requires a strong broadband connection to work well. Cloud gaming made up only a fraction of global internet traffic in 2022.
    Microsoft still needs to convince other regulators not to block the deal. The EU continues to probe the merger to assess whether it hurts competition, while the U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued to block the deal on antitrust grounds. More

  • in

    Norfolk Southern reports $387 million charge for the first quarter after East Palestine derailment

    Norfolk Southern on Wednesday reported an initial $387 million charge associated with the company’s East Palestine, Ohio, derailment in February.
    The charge resulted in a year-over-year decline in first-quarter profits, the rail company said.
    The earnings release reaffirmed Norfolk Southern CEO Alan Shaw’s commitment to supporting cleanup efforts in Ohio, pledging roughly $24 million in reimbursements and investments.

    General view of the site of the derailment of a train carrying hazardous waste, in East Palestine, Ohio, U.S., March 2, 2023. 
    Alan Freed | Reuters

    Norfolk Southern on Wednesday reported an initial $387 million charge associated with the company’s East Palestine, Ohio, derailment in February, which spilled toxic chemicals into the environment.
    The charge resulted in a year-over-year decline in first-quarter profits, the rail company said.

    Norfolk Southern said income from railway operations for the quarter was $711 million, down 34% from the same period in 2022. Excluding the East Palestine derailment, income from railway operations was $1.1 billion, up 1% compared to the same period the year prior.
    Net income for the period fell to $466 million, or $2.04 a share, down from $703 million, or $2.93, a year earlier. That comes despite a year-over-year jump in revenue of roughly 7% to $3.13 billion.
    Here’s how Norfolk Southern performed in the first quarter, compared with Refinitiv consensus estimates:

    EPS: $3.32, adjusted to exclude the impact of East Palestine, vs. $3.12 expected
    Revenue: $3.13 billion, vs. $3.11 billion expected

    The stock gained nearly 2% in premarket trading, but has dropped 16% year to date through Tuesday.
    The earnings release reaffirmed Norfolk Southern CEO Alan Shaw’s commitment to supporting cleanup efforts in Ohio, pledging roughly $24 million in reimbursements and investments. The National Transportation Safety Board is examining the company’s organization and safety culture through a special probe into the company.

    Shaw during the company’s earnings call Wednesday reiterated plans to install additional sensors, accelerate the deployment of advanced early detection technology, and increase safety training for first responders.
    Norfolk Southern did not announce estimates for further charges related to the East Palestine derailment.
    On Feb. 3, a Norfolk Southern freight train with 11 tank cars carrying hazardous materials derailed near Ohio’s border with Pennsylvania. The train subsequently ignited, sparking concerns surrounding environmental and health impacts for the community.
    In March, both the Justice Department and the state of Ohio sued Norfolk Southern. Democratic Sens. John Fetterman and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania and Sherrod Brown of Ohio introduced the new Railway Accountability Act at the end of last month, parts of which Shaw endorsed. More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: Activision Blizzard, Chipotle, First Republic Bank & more

    A trader works at the post where First Republic Bank stock is traded on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, March 16, 2023.
    Brendan McDermid | Reuters

    Check out the companies making headlines before the bell on Wednesday.
    Enphase Energy — The solar inverter company slid 16% after reporting disappointing revenue guidance for the second quarter. The company said Tuesday its upcoming quarterly revenue will range from $700 million to $750 million, compared to the expected $765.2 million from analysts surveyed by StreetAccount. Enphase reported adjusted earnings of $1.37 per share on $726 million in revenue, beating StreetAccount forecasts of earnings of $1.21 per share on $724.4 in revenue. Shares of rival Solaredge Technologies dropped 5.8%.

    related investing news

    13 hours ago

    Boeing — Boeing shares rose 3.7% in premarket trading after the company posted its latest quarterly results and said it would increase production of 737 Max planes later this year despite a production issue. The company reported an adjusted loss of $1.27 per share and $17.92 billion in revenue. Analysts polled by Refinitiv anticipated a loss per share of $1.07 on $17.57 billion in revenue. 
    Activision Blizzard — Activision Blizzard shares dropped about 10.4% in the premarket after a UK regulator blocked Microsoft’s purchase of the video game publisher. “The final decision to prevent the deal comes after Microsoft’s proposed solution failed to effectively address the concerns in the cloud gaming sector,” wrote the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority.
    First Republic Bank — The battered regional bank stock dropped 10% before the bell, with the potential to again weigh on the broader banking sector. First Republic on Monday reported that its deposits dropped 40% to $104.5 billion in the first quarter, and the stock lost nearly half its value Tuesday. 
    PacWest Bancorp — Shares jumped 14% in early morning trading after PacWest said it has seen deposit inflows over the past month. The regional bank said deposits fell more than 16% during the first quarter to roughly $28.2 billion, but that it has added about $1.8 billion in deposits since March 20, when it last updated investors. It saw $700 million in deposits in April. On Tuesday, PacWest also reported a net loss of $1.21 billion for the quarter, due largely to a goodwill impairment charge. Regional bank Western Alliance Bancorp also rose Wednesday before the bell.
    Microsoft — Shares advanced 8% after Microsoft reported fiscal third-quarter results and issued quarterly guidance that topped expectations. The tech firm reported earnings of $2.45 per share on revenue of $52.86 billion. Analysts polled by Refinitiv forecasted per-share earnings of $2.23 on revenue of $51.02 billion. Additionally, Microsoft finance chief Amy Hood issued fourth-quarter guidance of $54.85 billion to $55.85 billion in revenue. The middle of the range is greater than the $54.84 billion consensus estimate. Separately, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority on Wednesday blocked Microsoft’s acquisition of video game firm Activision Blizzard, weighing on the tech stock.

    Alphabet — Alphabet shares were flat before the bell even after the Google parent beat both earnings and revenue expectations for the recent quarter and announced a $70 billion share buyback plan. Ad revenue beat estimates but fell from a year ago. 
    Chipotle Mexican Grill — Shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill gained more than 7% in premarket trading after the burrito chain posted a top and bottom line beat for the most recent quarter. The company benefited during the period from strong same-store sales growth and said traffic grew despite a hike in menu prices.
    ServiceNow — The digital workflow company’s shares gained 3.1% after falling more than 6% during Tuesday’s session, when Infosys announced its collaboration with ServiceNow. ServiceNow will be announcing its quarterly earnings Wednesday after the bell.
    Amazon — The e-commerce giant saw its stock climb 2.8% in premarket trading. The gain came after fellow tech-related giant Microsoft reported quarterly earnings that exceeded expectations, boosting sentiment for Amazon. The company reports numbers Thursday after the bell.
    Thermo Fisher Scientific — Shares fell 3.9% after Thermo Fisher Scientific reported first-quarter earnings that came in line with expectations. The Massachusetts-based supplier of scientific instruments reported adjusted per-share earnings of $5.03, in line with a StreetAccount estimate. Thermo Fisher Scientific did beat revenue expectations, reporting revenue of $10.71 billion, greater than the $10.65 billion estimate.
    Coinbase — The cryptocurrency exchange added 5% in the premarket alongside a jump in cryptocurrency prices, including Bitcoins 5% rise. H.C. Wainwright also initiated coverage of Coinbase with a buy rating and $75 price target, which implies 34% upside from Tuesday’s close.
    — CNBC’s Sarah Min, Samantha Subin, Alex Harring, Hakyung Kim, Yun Li and Michelle Fox Theobald contributed reporting. More

  • in

    Boeing plans to boost 737 Max production to 38 planes per month despite manufacturing snag

    Boeing said Wednesday it will increase output of 737 Max planes to 38 a month later this year, up from 31 a month.
    Revenue jumped 28% year over year, and the company narrowed its net loss.
    Boeing on Wednesday reiterated it expects to achieve free cash flow for the year of between $3 billion and $5 billion.

    A Boeing 737 Max is displayed during the Farnborough Airshow, in Farnborough, on July 18, 2022. (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP) (Photo by JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP via Getty Images)
    Justin Tallis | AFP | Getty Images

    Boeing said Wednesday it plans to increase output of 737 Max planes to 38 a month from 31 later this year, despite a manufacturing issue affecting some aircraft.
    That production rate would be the highest in years for the best-selling aircraft and comes as Boeing seeks to get planes to airlines faster as those customers capitalize on a rebound in air travel. The company expects to deliver between 400 and 450 737 planes this year.

    “This is an important year for us,” Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun said in a staff memo on Wednesday. “As demand surges across our markets, we must focus together on execution and meeting our customer commitments.”
    Boeing is also planning to raise output of the 787 Dreamliner to five planes a month late this year from a current rate of three.
    Aircraft demand and stronger deliveries boosted Boeing’s revenue in the quarter with sales up 28% year-over-year. The company narrowed its net loss to $425 million, or 69 cents per share, from a year-ago net loss of $1.24 billion, or $2.06 per share.
    Revenue in Boeing’s commercial airplane unit rose 60% in the first quarter to $6.7 billion as deliveries of new aircraft picked up, but the company said it was partially offset by 787 Dreamliner customer compensation for delivery delays. It said a negative operating margin of 9.2% in the unit was tied to abnormal costs and research and development expenses.
    Boeing shares were up more than 3% in premarket trading after reporting results.

    Here’s how Boeing performed during the period ended March 31, compared with Refinitiv consensus estimates

    Adjusted loss per share: $1.27 vs. $1.07
    Revenue: $17.92 billion vs. $17.57 billion

    Adjusting for special items, Boeing lost $440 million, or $1.27 per share, compared with a year-ago net loss of $1.44 billion, or $2.75 per share. The company reported a $245 million pre-tax charge on the company’s KC-46A Tanker program tied to supplier issues.
    On Tuesday, major aircraft suppliers General Electric and Raytheon Technologies reported higher revenue in their engine units and an increase in repair shop visits and spare parts businesses.
    Boeing executives have said they would only increase output when they were confident in their supply chain, which has faced several snags after a host of layoffs and production declines during the pandemic.
    Earlier this month, the company disclosed a problem with two of eight fittings in a section of fuselage on certain 737 Max planes, its best-seller. Boeing had warned that the issue would slow deliveries of some aircraft.
    The pace of deliveries is key to its cash flow goals since customers pay for the bulk of the planes upon delivery. Boeing on Wednesday reiterated it expects to reach adjusted free cash flow for the year of between $3 billion and $5 billion.
    Boeing executives are scheduled to discuss results on a 10:30 a.m. ET call Wednesday. More

  • in

    Bankers’ pitch to save First Republic: Help us now, or pay more later when it fails

    Advisors to First Republic will attempt to cajole the big U.S. banks who’ve already propped it up into doing one more favor, CNBC has learned.
    The pitch is something like this: Purchase bonds from First Republic at above-market rates for a loss of a few billion dollars. If not, these same banks will face roughly $30 billion in FDIC fees when First Republic fails.
    The advisors have already lined up potential purchasers of new First Republic stock if they can fix the bank’s balance sheet, according to sources.

    The best hope for avoiding a collapse of ailing lender First Republic hinges on how persuasive one group of bankers can be with another group of bankers.
    Advisors to First Republic will attempt to cajole the big U.S. banks who’ve already propped it up into doing one more favor, CNBC has learned.

    related investing news

    19 hours ago

    The pitch will go something like this, according to bankers with knowledge of the situation: Purchase bonds from First Republic at above-market rates for a total loss of a few billion dollars – or face roughly $30 billion in Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. fees when First Republic fails.
    It’s the latest twist in a weekslong saga sparked by the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley Bank last month. Days after the government seized SVB and Signature, midsized banks hit by severe deposit runs, the country’s biggest lenders banded together to inject $30 billion in deposits into First Republic. That solution proved fleeting after the depth of the company’s problems became known.
    If the First Republic advisors manage to convince big banks to purchase bonds for more than they are worth —  to take the hit of investment losses for the good of the banking system, as well as their own welfare — then they are confident that other parties will step up to help the bank recapitalize itself.
    The advisors have already lined up potential purchasers of new First Republic stock in that scenario, according to the sources.

    Crucial days

    These investment bankers are now seeking to create a sense of urgency. CNBC’s David Faber, who first reported on the rescue plan Tuesday, said that the coming days are crucial for First Republic.

    The bank’s stock has been in free fall since disclosing Monday that its deposits dropped a staggering 41% recently, leaving it with $104.5 billion in deposits, including the infusion from big banks. Analysts covering the company published pessimistic reports after CEO Michael Roffler opted not to take any questions after a brief 12-minute conference call.
    “Now that the earnings are out, once you’ve got a window to act, it’s time to do it,” said one of the bankers, who asked for anonymity to speak candidly. “You never know what will happen if you wait, and you don’t want to be dealing with an emergency situation.”
    To help a deal happen, advisors may offer warrants or preferred stock so that banks involved in the rescue can reap some of the upside of saving First Republic, the sources said.

    False starts

    For years, First Republic was the envy of peers as its focus on rich Americans helped turbocharge growth and allowed it to poach talent. But that model broke down in the aftermath of the SVB failure as its wealthy customers quickly pulled uninsured deposits.
    Lazard and JPMorgan Chase were hired last month to advise First Republic, according to media reports.
    The key advantage of the advisors’ plan, they say, is that it allows First Republic to offload some, but not all of its underwater bonds. In a government receivership, the whole portfolio must get marked down at once, resulting in what Morgan Stanley analysts estimated to be a $27 billion hit.
    One complication, however, is that the advisors are relying on the U.S. government to summon bank CEOs together to explore possible solutions.
    There have been false starts already: One top four U.S. bank said that the government told it to be ready to act on the First Republic situation this past weekend, but nothing happened.

    Big bank doubts

    While the exact contour of any deal is a matter for negotiation and could include a special purpose vehicle or direct purchases, several possibilities address the bank’s ailing balance sheet. The bank is weighing the sale of $50 billion to $100 billion in debt, Bloomberg reported Tuesday.
    First Republic loaded up on low-yielding assets including Treasurys, municipal bonds and mortgages, making what was essentially a bet that interest rates wouldn’t rise. When they did, the bank found itself with tens of billions of dollars in losses.
    By drastically reducing the size of its balance sheet, the bank’s capital ratios will suddenly be far healthier, paving the way for it to raise more funds and continue as an independent company.
    Other possible, but less likely moves include converting the big bank’s deposits into equity, or even finding a buyer. But a suitor hasn’t emerged in the past month, and isn’t likely given that any purchaser would also own the losses on First Republic’s balance sheet.
    That has led sources close to the big banks to believe that the most likely scenario for First Republic is government receivership, which is how SVB and Signature were resolved.
    Those close to the banks were hesitant to endorse a plan in which they would have to recognize losses for overpaying for bonds. They also expressed distrust of government-brokered deals after some of the pacts from the 2008 financial crisis ended up being costlier than expected.

    Open vs closed 

    But the failures of SVB and Signature – the two biggest since the 2008 financial crisis – cost the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund many billions of dollars, which is paid for by member banks. They also benefited the buyers who were able to cherry-pick the best assets while the FDIC retains underwater bonds, the First Republic advisors noted.
    Advisors referred to the private market solutions as the “open bank” option, while government receivership is the “closed-banked” scenario.
    But there is a third possibility: the bank grinds on as is, slowly losing yet more value amid probable quarterly losses, talent flight and unceasing doubts.
    “Time, by the way, is not the bank’s friend,” analyst Don Bilson wrote Tuesday. “If anything, last night’s discouraging update will make it even harder for First Republic to keep what it has.” More

  • in

    Big money donors rally behind Biden as he launches his reelection bid

    Big money Democratic donors are lining up to support President Joe Biden now that he confirmed he’s running for reelection.
    Reid Hoffman, the billionaire LinkedIn co-founder, has offered to host fundraising events for Biden.
    Haim Saban, media mogul and the creator of the Power Rangers, said he “will do all I can to have President Biden reelected for a well deserved second term.”
    Alexander Soros, the son of billionaire George Soros, said in a tweet he’s “ridin with Biden.”

    US President Joe Biden acknowledges the crowd during an event on the creation of new manufacturing jobs at the Washington Hilton in Washington, DC, April 25, 2023.
    Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images

    Big donors in the business world started rallying around President Joe Biden soon after he announced Tuesday that he’s running for reelection next year.
    Executives spanning from tech to media to finance made it clear publicly and behind the scenes that they’re ready to help Biden overcome his soft approval ratings and fend off a heated Republican challenge – potentially in a rematch with former President Donald Trump.

    Several big Republican donors, meanwhile, have been scrambling to find an alternative to Trump, while some pinned their hopes on that potential candidate being Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has yet to announce whether he’s running. Some of those same donors have quietly started to look at other options beyond DeSantis as he continues his battle with Disney. Former Vice President Mike Pence could enter the GOP primary field, too.
    Regardless of the Republican nominee, Biden will likely have a formidable war chest for the 2024 campaign.
    Reid Hoffman, the billionaire LinkedIn co-founder, has offered to Biden’s allies to host fundraising events for the president once he announced he would run for reelection, according to one of the businessman’s close advisors.
    Hoffman has been allied with Biden for years. He co-hosted a virtual fundraiser in 2021 for the Democratic National Committee, which featured the president. The advisor noted that Hoffman was invited to attend a Biden donor meeting set to take place in Washington this week, although he cannot go due to personal reasons. Hoffman visted the White House a few weeks ago, this person noted.
    “They know they can rely on us,” this advisor said.

    Some of the people cited in this story declined to be named in order to speak freely about private deliberations. A Biden campaign spokesperson didn’t return a request for comment before publication.
    Haim Saban, the media mogul behind properties including the Power Rangers, told CNBC in an email he “will do all I can to have President Biden reelected for a well deserved second term.” He said he will be hosting events for Biden. Saban raised millions for Biden during the 2020 campaign, and he plans to “improve on that” in 2024.
    Jeffrey Katzenberg, a co-founder of DreamWorks and a veteran Democratic donor, is one of the co-chairs of Biden’s campaign for president. Katzenberg was among Biden’s 2020 fundraisers who attended a state dinner at the White House last year.
    Katzenberg told CNBC in an exclusive interview Tuesday night that he believes the Biden campaign will raise more this time around than in 2020. Then, Biden raised a bit more than $1 billion, while Trump brought in over $740 million, according to Federal Election Commission filings.
    Katzenberg has been in touch with Biden and his team of longtime advisors over the past year about the president’s 2024 run.
    “I’ve emphasized what he has accomplished and his leadership, and how essential it is in this moment in time for him to, one more time, saddle up and go do this,” Katzenberg said. “I have been as active and ambitious as possible in encouraging and supporting Biden to run again. I’ve been at it pretty consistently now for the last year.”
    He added that his expects his role as co-chair of the campaign to develop. He also emphasized how small dollar donors are going to play a key role for Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign, as they did in 2020.
    Biden’s campaign raised over $400 million from donors that gave under $200 during his last run for president, according to OpenSecrets. Katzenberg said that donors large and small have already reached out to him about how they can help.
    Katzenberg said he was “inundated” with messages of support from donors for the president Tuesday after Biden’s announcement.
    “It will take me days to get out from underneath the outpouring of support that has occurred in 12 hours after the launch,” he said.
    Charles Myers, a former vice chairman at Evercore and the founder of Signum Global Advisors, told CNBC that he plans to give and raise millions of dollars toward Biden’s 2024 candidacy.
    “Stakes are higher than ever. Trump 2.0 would be devastating for the country and arguably the world,” he said, noting that he plans to raise and contribute more than he ever has before.
    A different Biden fundraiser said there are already two New York City fundraising events in the works. The events are being organized, at least in part, by businessman Dennis Mehiel, who backed Biden in 2020, according to this person. Chicago businessman John Atkinson is also planning fundraising events in support of the president, this person said.
    Trump is the favorite in the GOP primary. An NBC News poll shows 46% of the Republican primary voters that took part in the survey support Trump over other contenders and potential candidates, including DeSantis. The majority of those surveyed said they would prefer that neither Biden nor Trump run for president.
    Fifty-four percent of the people polled said they disapprove of the job Biden’s doing. Other public surveys show Biden would be favored against Trump, albeit in a tight race.
    Trump’s dominance in the GOP field has pushed other big Democratic donors to start gearing up to back Biden. Venture capitalist Ron Conway has told friends he will help the president’s campaign, according to a person close to him.
    Conway did not return repeated requests for comment.
    Alexander Soros, the son of billionaire George Soros, said in a tweet he’s “ridin with Biden.” His spokesman did not have further details to provide on how either the elder Soros or his son plan to help the president.
    The younger Soros, who has publicly criticized Trump, has visited the White House at least 14 times since Biden became president, according to the New York Post. George Soros donated over $178 million during the 2022 midterm elections toward Democrats running up and down the ballot, according to OpenSecrets.
    Tom Steyer, a billionaire who has railed against Trump for years and supported Biden after running for president himself in 2020, tweeted his support for the president’s stance on climate change.
    “We need a leader who understands the urgency of this moment and will work with our allies to strengthen our global response – that’s @JoeBiden,” Steyer said.
    Steyer’s team did not respond to requests for comment. More

  • in

    Target rolls out curbside returns as retailers hope convenience will boost sales

    Target has started to offer curbside returns at roughly a quarter of its stores.
    Drive Up, its curbside pickup service, has been a major driver of the company’s online sales.
    The big-box retailer is sweetening the service, as it tries to hang on to pandemic-fueled gains.

    A worker delivers an order to a drive up customer at a Target store on August 19, 2020 in Miami, Florida.
    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Target is dangling a new perk to get shoppers to swing by its stores: customers can make returns without leaving their car.
    The curbside-returns service, which began last week at roughly a quarter of Target’s nearly 2,000 stores nationwide, will be available across the chain by the end of summer. 

    Target is sweetening its curbside-pickup service, Drive Up, to attract and retain customers as the retailer braces for a potential sales slowdown and tries to hang on to pandemic-fueled gains. Total annual revenue grew by about $31 billion – or nearly 40% – from fiscal 2019 to 2022.
    Now, as shoppers become more budget conscious and buy fewer discretionary items, Target said it expects comparable sales to range from a low single-digit decline to a low single-digit increase this fiscal year. At an investor day in February, it projected full-year earnings per share of between $7.75 and $8.75, below Wall Street’s expectations of $9.23 per share, according to StreetAccount estimates.
    The company hopes convenient perks like curbside returns will boost customer loyalty and jolt sales.
    “Any time we remove friction from our guest experience it benefits the guests and benefits Target because they deepen their relationship with us,” Chief Stores Officer Mark Schindele said. “We’ve shown that with Drive Up overall. Guests try that service, they love it and then they shop our stores more often.”
    Curbside pickup became a bigger sales driver for retailers’ e-commerce businesses, especially as shoppers tried to avoid crowds during the Covid pandemic. For some shoppers, the habit has stuck as work and home schedules are fuller and commutes are back — and retailers including Target and rival Walmart now aim to capitalize on that.

    Click-and-collect, a term used to describe buying online and picking up purchases curbside or in store, grew from 6% of overall e-commerce sales in the U.S. in 2019 to 11% in 2022, according to data from Euromonitor, a market research firm.
    Delivery still accounts for the majority of online sales, but click-and-collect drove about $114 billion of sales in 2022 — a jump from $36 billion in 2019, according to Euromonitor.
    In the U.S., the vast majority of click-and-collect comes from curbside pickups, said Bob Hoyler, industry manager for retail research at Euromonitor. 
    The market research firm anticipates click-and-collect sales in dollars will grow by 8% this year, compared with 2% for delivery. The growth will be fueled by consumers who opt for curbside pickup to avoid delivery fees or shipping minimums at a time of heightened price sensitivity, Hoyler said.
    Target debuted Drive Up in 2017 as a test in Minneapolis, where the company is based. It expanded the service to stores across all 50 states in 2019. It added fresh and frozen groceries in 2020, and tacked on wine and beer the following year. 
    Last year, the retailer expanded the service to allow shoppers to order a Starbucks drink to retrieve when they pick up their curbside order. The service is available at about 240 stores.
    Sales fulfilled through Drive Up grew more than 70% in the fiscal year that ended in late January 2022, on top of a more than 600% boom during the prior fiscal year, the company said. Drive Up sales grew more than 10% in the most recent fiscal year.
    Target’s same-day services, which include Drive Up, accounted for more than half of digital sales as of late January as consumers embrace convenience. Same-day services also include Target-owned delivery service Shipt and Order Pickup, which allows shoppers to retrieve an online purchase inside of a store.
    The retailer’s average fulfillment cost per unit has fallen by 40% over the past four years as those services grow, Chief Operating Officer John Mulligan said at an investor day in February. More than 95% of Target’s total sales, including digital, are fulfilled in stores.
    Other retailers have added to curbside pickup. Walmart rolled out curbside returns at all of its stores ahead of the 2022 holiday season. Dick’s Sporting Goods added curbside returns to its services in 2020 and offers it across all of its stores.
    Neither company would quantify the use of curbside pickup or returns, but Walmart said it has seen nearly double the volume of customers using curbside returns from its launch across the chain last fall compared with this month.
    At an investor event earlier this month, Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said the retailer is competing on convenience, too. He credited pickup and delivery for driving growth in recent years, and said the company’s recent survey results show customers are choosing the big-box retail giant to save time along with money.
    Yet other retailers such as Kohl’s have eliminated curbside pickup. It ended the service last summer, swapping it out for a self-pickup service inside of stores.
    The company’s shift to self pickup is part of efforts to cut costs, including by reducing its payroll, Chief Financial Officer Jill Timm said in September at a Goldman Sachs conference. She said Kohl’s is also testing self checkout and self returns.
    For some retailers, the time and labor of curbside pickup can be hard to justify — especially since it encourages shoppers to stay in their cars rather than step into stores where they may fill up their carts with more purchases, Euromonitor’s Hoyler said.
    Those concerns fueled skepticism of curbside returns within Target, too.
    Most Target returns are made at the store, according to the company. Inside of a store, a shopper may swap out a returned product for another or grab an impulse item.
    At Target’s investor day in late February, Citibank analyst Paul Lejuez asked if the retailer would ultimately miss out on purchases by adding curbside returns.
    Schindele, the chief stores officer, said Target is focused on the lifetime value of a customer, not just the economics of a single transaction. He said allowing curbside returns also helps the retailer get unwanted items back on the sales floor faster and lowers the cost of mail-in returns.
    He added that curbside pickup still inspires browsing and other purchases. On average, about 20% of customers who pick up Drive Up orders also make an in-store purchase on the same day, he said.
    “What we find is when a guest uses Drive Up — and it could be Drive Up returns, it could be Drive Up purchase — we find that they spend more money in store over the course of the year.”
    During tests of curbside returns, some shoppers have stopped by just to return an item, Schindele said. Others have picked up purchases while making a return. Still others have retrieved items they bought, made a return and gotten a Starbucks drink.
    For Target, curbside returns could serve as a differentiator and a complement to the merchandise mix it sells, Hoyler said. Target’s sales focus is on general merchandise, such as apparel and beauty products, with only roughly 20% of its annual sales coming from grocery items. That’s much less than Walmart, which draws nearly 60% of its annual U.S. sales from grocery.
    That general merchandise tends to be returned much more often than items like milk and bananas, he said. More