More stories

  • in

    Old planes get stripped for parts while airlines wait on new jets

    COOLIDGE, Arizona – From engines to landing gear, the hunt is on for aircraft parts as airlines prepare their jets for swarms of summer travelers, with new planes from Boeing and Airbus still in short supply.
    The search for parts leads some aircraft owners here, where older, retired planes are stripped for parts that will be prepared to fly on other planes or repurposed altogether. Some parts can be turned into high-end furniture, like $42,000 desks. What’s left can be crushed into scrap and melted down.

    Until they’re picked apart, the planes are stored in arid climates, like the Arizona desert, to avoid damaging weather and humidity.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    An Airbus plane with parts removed in Coolidge, Arizona.
    Leslie Josephs | CNBC

    The used-parts business was worth about $3 billion to $5 billion before the pandemic, according to Mike Stengel, a principal at AeroDynamic Advisory. It’s now riding a boom in global aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul, an industry that is set to expand 22% this year to $94 billion, consulting firm Oliver Wyman estimated in a report in February.
    The current demand for aircraft parts is the result of the industry’s deep demand swings resulting from the Covid pandemic. In an effort to cut costs when demand collapsed amid travel restrictions, airlines raced to retire planes, only to need aircraft later when demand returned. Carriers also deferred maintenance and prioritized using engines with more time left on them.
    Meanwhile, Boeing and Airbus are still trying to stabilize their supply chains and train workers after thousands left the industry during the pandemic’s slump.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    One challenge is locating feedstock of aircraft. Travel demand is recovering — the International Air Transport Association last week said global air traffic is nearly 85% recovered to 2019 levels. In the U.S. it’s already past that point.

    With deliveries of new jets behind schedule, airlines are holding onto planes longer, repairing or overhauling them, adding to demand for parts and labor.

    Technicians remove an engine covering from a retired plane in Marana, Arizona
    Leslie Josephs/CNBC

    Last year, 273 commercial jets were retired, the fewest in almost two decades and half the number in 2019, said Aerodynamic’s Stengel, citing data from the Centre for Aviation.
    “There are supply chain issues across the aviation industry at the moment where these highly valuable parts made out of often-rare and precious materials can’t be produced quick enough,” said Lee McConnellogue, chief executive of ecube, a U.K.-based company that provides “end-of-life” services for aircraft. “So airlines and maintenance companies alike have to find an alternate source other than brand new.”

    A used airplane is dismantled in Marana, Arizona.
    Leslie Josephs/CNBC

    Ecube recently expanded, opening a facility here adding to its portfolio that includes Spain and Wales. The new site features a crush pad where old planes are shredded before being carted off.
    “Engine shops are really full,” said Rob Morris, global head of consultancy at aviation data firm Cirium. “Used material’s in demand.”

    Technicians remove an engine covering from a retired plane in Marana, Arizona
    Leslie Josephs/CNBC

    Morris said that’s also driving up the prices to rent engines. For example, a CFM56 engine that powers some older models of the Boeing 737 is renting for $65,000 a month, up from $55,000 a month last year.

    Airbus A320 landing gear in a repair shop in Marana, Arizona.
    Leslie Josephs | CNBC

    Boeing and Airbus executives are planning to pick up the pace in production and aircraft deliveries this year, however, which could boost plane retirements and in turn add to supplies of used parts and drive down the price.
    “There are a couple of stars that have to align for the retirement floodgates to accelerate, and one big one is Airbus and Boeing being able to consistently deliver aircraft according to schedule — and for airlines to believe them,” Stengel said. More

  • in

    What Dominion’s lawsuit could mean for Fox and its cable TV networks

    Dominion Voting System’s defamation lawsuit against Fox Corp. and its cable TV networks will go to trial on Monday.
    Industry analysts and experts watching the case say the biggest consequence to the company will likely be financial, as viewership and advertising remain steady.
    But the outcome of the case is far from clear, and neither side appears interested in settling.

    Members of Rise and Resist participate in their weekly “Truth Tuesday” protest at News Corp headquarters on February 21, 2023 in New York City. 
    Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Dominion Voting System’s defamation lawsuit against Fox Corp. and its cable TV networks will go to trial in the coming days, but it remains to be seen what, exactly, the lawsuit means for Fox and its business.
    Dominion brought its lawsuit against Fox and its TV networks, Fox News and Fox Business, in March 2021, arguing their hosts pushed false claims that Dominion’s voting machines were rigged in the 2020 presidential election that saw Joe Biden triumph over Donald Trump. The trial begins on Monday.

    IAC Chairman Barry Diller, who was chairman and CEO of parent-company Fox from 1984 to 1992, said at a media conference hosted by startup Semafor earlier this week that although he thought Fox should lose the case, handing Dominion “a very big reward,” that the company will just pay the damages and move on.
    “What’s it going to do? Worsen [Fox Corp. Chair] Rupert Murdoch’s reputation?” Diller joked.

    On its face, the biggest potential consequence for Fox would be a financial hit: The company will have to pay to defend itself against the claims and, if it loses, possible damages to Dominion, upwards of $1.6 billion. No matter the outcome, an appeal is likely.
    Fox, which has denied the claims made by Dominion and said it is protected by the First Amendment, has opposed the amount of the damages that the voting machine maker is seeking. The Delaware judge overseeing the case — who ruled a trial was necessary — recently said it would be up to a jury to decide the matter. 

    Business risk

    Neither side has shown signs of a wanting to settle the case, and the two parties have met once at a court-ordered meeting. But even if they did come to a settlement, Fox would still be on the hook for a steep payment, experts say.  

    “There could be a lot of implications depending on how it plays out,” said Imraan Farukhi, an assistant professor at Syracuse University’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications. Besides the financial impact, Farukhi added, “The other question is what will they do with their talent if they lose? The majority of the stars at Fox are implicated. Any other news organization would have probably seen their hosts losing their jobs for improper reporting.”
    Lou Dobbs, who is slated to be a witness, saw his weekday program on the Fox Business network canceled the day after he was named a defendant in the defamation lawsuit of a second voting machine company, Smartmatic. At the time, Fox said his show’s cancellation was in the works prior to the lawsuit.
    Shows helmed by Tucker Carlson, Maria Bartiromo, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Jeanine Pirro have been listed as evidence by Dominion. Those hosts also are slated to testify in Dominion’s case.
    On Wednesday, the Delaware judge overseeing the case sanctioned Fox for withholding evidence and reportedly said if depositions or anything else needed to be redone, it would come at a cost to the company.
    But the most likely immediate effect on Fox and its bottom line could come in the form of libel training classes for talent and others in the newsroom, as well as an increase in production insurance policies that cover defamatory statements, Farukhi said. Those policies could also help cover the costs related to the lawsuit for Fox.
    Still, a near-term financial impact is unlikely to spell disaster for the network.
    As thousands of documents have been unveiled in recent months, revealing skepticism from Fox’s top TV hosts and executives about the election-fraud claims that were made on air, Fox News’ ratings have remained stable, according to Nielsen. Similarly, so has the parent company’s stock price. 

    Stock chart icon

    Fox Corp.’s stock has remained stable in recent months as evidence implicating its TV hosts and executives have come to light in Dominion’s defamation lawsuit.

    Fox News’ steady audience has also ensured that advertisers stick around, too. Oftentimes, companies will pull their ads when TV networks are embroiled in controversy. For Fox, that hasn’t been an issue in its lawsuit battle with Dominion. 
    “I am hesitant to say how this could implicate their business when it comes to viewership and sponsors,” Farukhi said. “Their audience and sponsors seem to not really care what the network is being accused of in this case. They only stop viewing Fox when it provides information that is not congruent with their predetermined conclusions.”
    Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan Murdoch sounded confident about the network’s future when asked during a March investor conference if he could share anything about the case.
    “I think fundamentally what I’ll just say about it is that a news organization has an obligation and it is an obligation to report news fulsomely, and without fear or favor,” Murdoch said at the time. “That’s what Fox News has always done and that’s what Fox News will always do.” 
    He added that “the noise that you hear about this case is actually not about the law and it’s not about journalism and it’s really about politics.”  
    No other questions were asked during the conference. 

    Amendment protections

    Fox has continuously denied the claims made against its network and hosts, arguing the case is about First Amendment protections “of the media’s absolute right to cover the news.” Attorneys have argued that covering the allegations being made by Trump and his attorneys was newsworthy and protected by the First Amendment. 
    For that reason, the case has been closely watched by First Amendment experts. While it’s difficult to prove a defamation case in the U.S., many believe there’s enough evidence this time that it could happen. 
    “The fact that the lawsuit hasn’t settled yet, and Dominion likely doesn’t want to settle, shows they have a good likelihood of prevailing,” said Gautam Hans, an associate law professor and First Amendment expert at Cornell University. “There’s been a lot of embarrassing, contradictory statements that have come out from the discovery process that even if Dominion loses there will have been pain inflicted on Fox along the way.” 
    The evidence gathered for the case — which includes text messages, emails and other internal communications between Fox’s executives, TV hosts, producers and others tied to the newsroom — shows those at the network and parent company were skeptical of what was being reported.
    The elder Murdoch, the Fox Corp. chair, suggested the TV hosts “went too far,” and said during his deposition that some of the network’s commentators “endorsed” the claims. 
    Paul Ryan, the former Republican speaker of the House and a Fox board member, told Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch “that Fox News should not be spreading conspiracy theories,” according to court papers. 
    Fox News host Carlson said in a text message to his producer that pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell was lying, according to court papers. In other texts, Carlson said, “It’s unbelievably offensive to me. Our viewers are good people and they believe it.”  More

  • in

    Delta Air Lines posts quarterly loss but forecasts profit as peak travel season approaches

    Delta posted a quarterly loss driven in part by a new pilot contract.
    The airline forecast revenue growth and profit for the second quarter that were ahead of analysts’ estimates.
    CEO Ed Bastian on Thursday brushed off the potential of a consumer pullback in spending.

    Delta Air Lines airplanes at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) in Atlanta, Georgia, on Tuesday, Dec. 21, 2021.
    Elijah Nouvelage | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Delta Air Lines posted a wider loss than it previously estimated for the first three months of the year, but forecast revenue growth and profit for the second quarter that were ahead of analysts’ estimates, signaling strong travel demand despite weakness in other sectors.
    CEO Ed Bastian on Thursday brushed off the potential of a consumer pullback in spending.

    Air travel “is something the consumer’s prioritizing,” Bastian said in an interview. “They may be pulling back in other areas … but I don’t see it in our credit card data, I don’t see it in our bookings.”
    The Atlanta-based carrier said it expects sales in the current quarter to increase by 15% to 17% over last year, with adjusted operating margins of as much as 16% and adjusted earnings per share of between $2 to $2.25. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had anticipated second-quarter revenue growth of 14.7% and earnings per share of $1.66.
    The airline projected “record advance bookings for the summer.”
    Bastian said the carrier is dialing back its capacity growth plans for the summer, however, in an effort to improve reliability. Airlines have faced aircraft delivery delays, staffing and training backlogs, and constrained airspace.
    Delta said it plans to grow capacity 17% in the second quarter from a year earlier, though that won’t get the carrier back to 2019 levels as it previously planned.

    “We’re intentionally pulling back some of the capacity,” Bastian told CNBC. “We want to make sure we don’t outrun our capabilities.”
    He said the airline should be able to get to 2019 capacity levels by the end of the year.
    U.S. carriers generally make the bulk of their revenue during the busy spring and summer travel season and Delta’s outlook points to more strength in travel demand, and its strong pricing power. Delta is the first U.S. carrier to report earnings. United Airlines will report on Tuesday, and other carriers will report later in the month.
    Here’s how Delta performed in the first quarter, ended March 31, compared with Wall Street expectations based on Refinitiv consensus estimates:

    Adjusted earnings per share: 25 cents vs. 30 cents expected.
    Adjusted revenue: $11.84 billion vs. $11.99 billion expected.

    Delta posted a net loss of $363 million, or 57 cents per share, citing, in part, a new, four-year pilot contract that includes 34% raises. That’s still an improvement from the year-ago period, when travel demand was still recovering and the company reported a net loss of $940 million, or $1.48 per share.
    Adjusting for one-time items, the company reported net income of $163 million, or 25 cents per share, up from a loss of $748 million, or $1.23 per share, during the first quarter of 2022.
    Unit costs, excluding fuel were up 4.7% on the year, partly driven by winter storms that grounded flights.
    Delta said its corporate bookings have been recovering, with domestic sales in March 85% back to 2019 levels. It also got a boost in its loyalty program, with its co-branded credit card partnership with American Express contributing $1.7 billion in the last quarter, up 38% from last year, Delta said.
    The airline said sales from premium cabins like first class were outpacing revenue from standard coach.
    Delta shares were up 2% in premarket trading. More

  • in

    GM expands high-end Chevy Silverado HD lineup with new ZR2 off-road model

    General Motors will continue to test the price ceiling of its highly profitable full-size pickup trucks as it spends billions to transition to all-electric vehicles.
    The latest model revealed Thursday is the Chevrolet Silverado HD 2500 ZR2, a new off-road model for one of GM’s most expensive pickup trucks.
    Automakers such as GM, Ford Motor and others have been growing off-road vehicle offerings as a way to boost profits.

    2024 Chevrolet Silverado HD ZR2

    DETROIT — General Motors will continue to test the price ceiling of its highly profitable full-size pickup trucks as it spends billions to transition to all-electric vehicles.
    The latest model revealed Thursday is the Chevrolet Silverado HD 2500 ZR2, a new off-road model for one of GM’s most expensive pickup trucks. The company also unveiled a special-edition “ZR2 Bison” version in partnership with well-known off-road parts supplier American Expedition Vehicles.

    Automakers such as GM, Ford Motor and others have been growing off-road vehicle offerings as a way to boost profits on their trucks and SUVs with far less investment than a new vehicle.

    2024 Chevrolet Silverado HD ZR2 Bison

    “ZR2 has been a huge success for us,” said Michael MacPhee, director of Chevy truck marketing. “The performance/off-road space is the fastest-growing in pickup right now. So, it’s a natural extension for us to build that to the HD space.”
    MacPhee declined to disclose expected profit margins for the upcoming vehicles, which will begin production at a Michigan plant this summer.
    The new ZR2 trucks are in addition to similar models of smaller pickups such as the Chevrolet Colorado and Chevrolet Silverado 1500, a smaller sibling of the 2500 model. MacPhee said current ZR2 models are the fastest-turning vehicles of the brand’s premium trims and bring in the highest number of new customers.

    2024 Chevrolet Silverado HD ZR2

    The company declined to disclose exact pricing for the new ZR2 pickups, saying they will be “aspirational but attainable.” The current Chevrolet Silverado 1500 ZR2 starts at about $74,000 for a comparable model. GM also currently offers a Z71 off-road package of the large HD truck that can easily top $80,000.

    The ZR2 vehicles feature a host of off-road components, systems and capabilities. Even if owners don’t use the trucks for their intended use cases, off-road vehicles have grown in popularity for their more aggressive looks and taller ride height.
    The HD ZR2 trucks will be offered exclusively in the 2500 four-door crew cab configuration. The standard 6.6-liter V8 gasoline engine will produce 401 horsepower and 464 foot-pounds of torque. A 6.6-liter Duramax turbo-diesel with 445 horsepower and 910 foot-pounds will also be available. GM said diesel is expected to make up a majority of the sales, like it does for current HD models.
    GM’s burly fossil fuel-powered pickup trucks are assisting the automaker in investing $35 billion in electric and autonomous vehicles between 2020 and 2025.

    2024 Chevrolet Silverado HD ZR2 More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest premarket moves: Delta, First Solar, Steve Madden & more

    Los Angeles, CA – March 29: Delta Air Lines unveils a new $1.9-billion Terminal 3 at Los Angeles International Airport on Tuesday, March 29, 2022 in Los Angeles, CA.
    Irfan Khan | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making the biggest moves in premarket trading:
    Delta Air Lines — Shares popped 2% in the premarket after the airline projected “record advance bookings for the summer.” It expects sales in the current quarter to increase by 15% to 17% over last year, topping Refinitiv estimates of 14.7%. Delta forecasted adjusted earnings per share of between $2 and $2.25, versus the $1.66 expected by analysts.

    United Airlines, American Airlines — Shares of other airlines also rose after Delta signaled strong demand for travel. United Airlines gained more than 2% and American Airlines rose 1.9%.
    First Solar —The solar stock slid 1.4% following a downgrade to hold from buy by Deutsche Bank. The firm said the stock is expensive after its recent rally.
    Merck — The pharma giant gained 1% in the premarket after being upgraded by Citi to buy from neutral, saying its drug pipeline is underappreciated. The Wall Street firm boosted the stock’s price target to $130, which implies 14% upside from Wednesday’s closing price.
    Steven Madden — Shares rose about 2.7% after being upgraded to buy from neutral by Citi. The Wall Street firm said it expects Steve Madden to begin seeing stronger wholesale reorders in the second quarter.
    Novo Nordisk — The maker of diabetes and weight loss drugs Ozempic and Wegovy moved about 2% higher in the premarket after being upgraded by Credit Suisse to outperform from neutral. The Wall Street firm said growth in the drugs has “significantly outperformed” its expectations.

    Harley-Davidson — Shares dropped nearly 4% in the premarket after UBS said retail declines for the motorcycle maker in the first quarter may be worse than expected. The Wall Street firm said retail sales could be down close to 20% at U.S. dealers.
    — CNBC’s Alex Harring contributed reporting. More

  • in

    Bloomberg plans to integrate GPT-style A.I. into its terminal

    Bloomberg LP has developed an AI model using the same underlying technology as OpenAI’s GPT, and plans to integrate it into features delivered through its terminal software.
    The financial information giant says Bloomberg GPT, its internal AI model, can more accurately answer questions like “CEO of Citigroup Inc?”, assess whether headlines are bearish or bullish for investors, and even write headlines based on short blurbs.
    The move shows how software developers in many industries beyond Silicon Valley see state-of-the-art AI like GPT as a technical advancement allowing them to automate tasks that used to require a human.

    Bloomberg computer terminal at the NYSE.
    Adam Jeffery | CNBC

    Bloomberg LP has developed an AI model using the same underlying technology as OpenAI’s GPT, and plans to integrate it into features delivered through its terminal software, a company official said in an interview with CNBC.
    Bloomberg says that Bloomberg GPT, an internal AI model, can more accurately answer questions like “CEO of Citigroup Inc?”, assess whether headlines are bearish or bullish for investors, and even write headlines based on short blurbs.

    Large language models trained on terabytes of text data are the hottest corner of the tech industry. Giants such as Microsoft and Google are racing to integrate the technology into their products, and artificial intelligence startups are regularly raising funds at valuations over $1 billion.
    Bloomberg’s move shows how software developers in many industries beyond Silicon Valley see state-of-the-art AI like GPT as a technical advancement allowing them to automate tasks that used to require a human.
    “Both the capabilities of GPT-3 and the way that it achieved its performance through language modeling wasn’t something that I expected,” said Gideon Mann, head of ML Product and Research at Bloomberg. “So when that came out, we were like, ‘OK, this is going to change the way that we do NLP here.'”
    NLP stands for natural language processing, the part of machine learning that focuses on deriving meaning from words.
    The move also shows how the AI market may not be dominated by giants with massive amounts of generalized data.

    Building large language models is expensive, requiring access to supercomputers and millions of dollars to pay for them, and some have wondered if OpenAI and Big Tech companies would develop an insurmountable lead. In this scenario, they would be the winners, and simply sell access to their AIs to everybody else.
    But Bloomberg’s GPT doesn’t use OpenAI. The company was able to use freely available, off-the-shelf AI methods and apply them to its massive store of proprietary — if niche — data.
    So far, Bloomberg says its GPT shows promising results doing tasks like figuring out whether a headline is good or bad for a company’s financial outlook, changing company names to stock tickers, figuring out the important names in a document, and even answering basic business questions like who the CEO of a company is.
    It also can do some “generative AI” applications, like suggesting a new headline based on a short paragraph.
    One example in the paper:

    Input: “The US housing market shrank in value by $2.3 trillion, or 4.9%, in the second half of 2022, according to Redfin. That’s the largest drop in percentage terms since the 2008 housing crisis, when values slumped 5.8% during the same period”
    Output: “Home Prices See Biggest Drop in 15 Years.”

    How it could be used

    OpenAI’s GPT is often called a “foundational” model because it wasn’t intended for a specific task.
    Bloomberg’s approach is different. It was specifically trained on a large number of financial documents collected by the firm over the years to create a model that’s especially fluent in money and business.
    In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT was trained on terabytes of text, the vast majority of which had nothing to do with finance.
    About half of the data used to create Bloomberg’s model comes from nonfinancial sources scraped from the web, including GitHub, YouTube subtitles, and Wikipedia.
    But Bloomberg also added over 100 billion words from a proprietary dataset called FinPile, which includes financial data the firm has accumulated over the last 20 years, including securities filings, press releases, Bloomberg News stories, stories from other publications and a web crawl focused on financial webpages.
    It turns out that adding specific training materials increased accuracy and performance enough on financial tasks that Bloomberg is planning to integrate its GPT into features and services accessed through the company’s Terminal product, although Bloomberg is not planning a ChatGPT-style chatbot.
    One early application would be to transform human language into the specific database language that Bloomberg’s software uses.
    For example, it would transform “Tesla price” into “(get(px_last) for([‘TSLA US Equity’])”.
    Another possibility would be for the model to do behind-the-scenes work cleaning data and doing other errands on the application’s back end.
    But Bloomberg is also looking at using artificial intelligence to power features that could help financial professionals save time and stay on top of the news.
    “There’s a lot of work we’re doing to help clients address that data deluge of news stories, whether that’s through summarization, or monitoring, or being able to ask questions on those news stories or transcripts. There are a lot of applications there,” Mann said. More

  • in

    Where did woke ideas start to spread?

    “Team america: world police”, a comedy puppet film, pokes fun at American self-importance. The theme song boasts of the things the country has created: McDonald’s, the nfl and rock-and-roll; also, less plausibly, liberty, Christmas and books. New work by David Rozado of Te Pukenga–New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology suggests something else that Americans did not invent: the “woke” phenomenon. The term refers to a loose constellation of ideas that have changed how educated, left-leaning folk view the world. It says all disparities between racial groups are proof of structural racism; that norms of free speech, individualism and universalism are camouflage for discrimination; and that injustice will persist until systems of privilege are dismantled. The conventional wisdom says that woke ideas began in the social-science departments of American universities, migrated to the country’s newspapers and spread elsewhere. This was always a partial story. The godfathers of woke ideas, including Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida, philosophers who argued all social relations were really about power, were based largely in France. Mr Rozado’s new paper takes things further. He analyses 98m news articles, tracking words such as “transphobic”, “racist” and “sexist”. The phenomenon, it seems, did not begin in America (see chart). Countries such as Australia, Canada and Sweden in fact led the charge. Why did America lag behind? Maybe genuine prejudice suddenly became worse outside America, though this seems unlikely. Another possibility relates to the economy. America’s recovery from the global financial crisis of 2007-09 was faster than elsewhere. Anger at the system may have been more acute in other places. A third possibility concerns politics. America has historically been less receptive to left-wing ideas. It is perhaps no surprise that woke ideas were slower to take hold. Researchers will have quibbles with the methodology: it is hard to rigorously quantify something as slippery as wokeness. Nonetheless, the phenomenon is undoubtedly global. Wherever you go, it is hard to escape social-justice warriors. World police, indeed. ■For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in economics, finance and markets, sign up to Money Talks, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter. More

  • in

    More and more Americans are gaming the deposit-insurance system

    Imagine you are the dealer at a vast card table. There are 3,000 players, each of whom is holding a different number of cards. Some have thousands; others a handful. Each will hold onto some cards and return the rest to you. Your job is to reshuffle the deck and deal it again such that each player has the same number of cards they held before, but none of the same ones they handed over. At any point a player might recall a specific card it once held.It is a nightmarish task for a poor human shuffler, but a trivial one for the whizzy algorithms that govern the business of managing “reciprocal deposits”, in which a bank places deposits with another and receives the same value back, via a few mostly unknown technology firms. These quiet giants of financial plumbing reallocate enormous amounts of deposits. Around $1trn-worth are reshuffled through the platforms, of which about a fifth are swapped in reciprocal arrangements. This is a sizeable slice of the $18trn in total deposits parked with American financial institutions at the end of last year.Deposit-swapping means banks can offer their customers more insurance. After the failure in March of Silicon Valley Bank, where some 93% of deposits were uninsured, this has become a priority for customers and institutions. The cap on insurance—a regulatory guarantee that money will be repaid in the event of a bank failure—is $250,000 per account holder. Wealthy individuals and businesses often hold more than that. Around 45% of deposits in the American banking system were uninsured at the end of last year. Those seeking more protection would once have had to plod from bank to bank themselves. If an institution wanted to offer greater deposit insurance by placing deposits elsewhere it would have had to forgo using the deposit as funding. But in 2002 the idea for reciprocal deposits was invented by Eugene Ludwig, who previously ran the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a regulator. The firm he and his co-founders set up, IntraFi, allows banks to sign up to place deposits around the system such that they are all insured, while also remitting back to the bank the same value of deposits from other places. IntraFi was the first firm to do this, and remains by far the biggest. It has 3,000 banks on its platform. However, it has been joined by a handful of other companies, including r&t Deposit Solutions, the second largest reshuffler with around 350 banks in its network, and smaller players including ModernFi and StoneCastle Cash Management. These firms are now experiencing something of a boom. Kevin Bannerton of r&t says that the value of his company’s reciprocal deposits has increased by more than 30% since the beginning of March. He reports that new institutions are clamouring to sign up. Mark Jacobsen, boss of IntraFi, says the company has seen “significant” growth in its reciprocal-deposit business over the same period.All this deposit-swapping raises the question of whether it makes sense to maintain the federal cap. The private sector has come up with a clever workaround to offer more deposit insurance than mandated. It is conceivable that, with several thousand banks in the network, an account could offer deposit insurance for hundreds of millions of dollars. Indeed, StoneCastle offers an account with $125m in deposit insurance. But there is a difference between a private-sector workaround and a public-sector mandate. It is currently difficult to match banks so that all are able to offer such high limits (most offer just a few million dollars’ insurance), and reciprocal-deposit firms levy fees, too. They apply on top of the charges, of between 0.05% and 0.32% of the value of total liabilities, that institutions pay for federal-deposit insurance. Abolishing the cap would make insurance pricier across the system; these higher costs would almost certainly be passed on to customers in the form of lower interest rates. Still, if enough depositors seek insurance by spreading deposits around, higher costs might be the result anyway. ■For more expert analysis of the biggest stories in economics, finance and markets, sign up to Money Talks, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter. More