More stories

  • in

    Cramer's lightning round: Chubb is 'a great company'

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    It’s that time again! “Mad Money” host Jim Cramer rings the lightning round bell, which means he’s giving his answers to callers’ stock questions at rapid speed.

    Loading chart…

    Nokia Corp: “I thought they should’ve had a better quarter. … It did not deliver.”

    Loading chart…

    Loading chart…

    Loading chart…

    Loading chart…

    Plug Power Inc: “I like the long-term prospects. … Right now, this is a very tough day for a stock like Plug Power.”

    Loading chart…

    Loading chart…

    Lumen Technologies Inc: “[The stock price is] too cheap. Something must be going on that I just don’t understand.”

    Loading chart…

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Jim Cramer warns that the Fed’s fight against inflation will beat down ‘formerly high-flying stocks’

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Friday that the Federal Reserve’s attempts to crush inflation by raising interest rates will also inevitably bring down “formerly high-flying stocks” – even those that are “legitimate” companies.
    “While we wait for the Fed to finish hitting the brakes, the formerly high-flying stocks with no earnings and little sales will keep drifting lower and lower and lower,” the “Mad Money” host said.

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Friday that the Federal Reserve’s attempts to crush inflation by raising interest rates will also inevitably bring down “formerly high-flying stocks” — even those that are “legitimate” companies.
    The stock market is “a major risk to containing inflation. It’s not just collateral damage, it’s one of [Fed Chair Jay Powell’s] targets. Not every stock, but certainly the ones with shaky valuation underpinnings that were trading through the roof on sales or even orders,”  the “Mad Money” host said.

    “While we wait for the Fed to finish hitting the brakes, the formerly high-flying stocks with no earnings and little sales will keep drifting lower and lower and lower, because they represent still one more front” in controlling inflation, he added.
    Stocks fell on Friday, though to a lesser degree than Thursday’s downturn, with both days overtaking the rally that came after the Fed’s meeting on Wednesday.
    The Fed raised interest rates by 50 basis points and noted implementing larger rate hikes “is not something the committee is actively considering” to control inflation.
    “I don’t think Powell is deliberately trying to tamp down on the irrational exuberance in specific stocks like a Shopify or … HubSpot, or Toast or Bill.com. They’re all legitimate companies, it’s just that their valuations were way too high, and that froth helped fuel the over-inflated IPO and SPAC bubble,” he said, referring to initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition companies.
    Still, Cramer said that high-quality companies with real products, profits and value for shareholders have done well during the Fed’s tightening, and he believes the economy overall is strong enough to take even a 100-basis point rate hike.

    “Powell took the possibility of a 75-basis point rate hike off the table. I see that as a mistake. … To me, it’s just much better to get the pain over with as fast as possible,” he said.
    Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer’s every move in the market.
    Disclaimer

    Questions for Cramer?Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC
    Want to take a deep dive into Cramer’s world? Hit him up!Mad Money Twitter – Jim Cramer Twitter – Facebook – Instagram
    Questions, comments, suggestions for the “Mad Money” website? [email protected]

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Elon Musk denies claim by Truth Social boss that Trump encouraged him to buy Twitter

    Elon Musk flatly denied a claim by the head of ex-President Donald Trump’s new social media company that Trump had encouraged Musk’s bid to buy Twitter.
    “This is false,” the Tesla and SpaceX chief tweeted in reply to a New York Post article about the story told by Trump Media & Technology Group CEO Devin Nunes.
    Nunes, during an appearance on Fox Business Network, had said that Trump’s social media app, Truth Social, was “all for” Musk’s move to take Twitter private with a $44 billion buyout offer.
    “President Trump, basically before Elon Musk bought it, actually said to go and buy it,” claimed Nunes, a former Republican congressman from California.

    Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, speaks to media representatives at the Tesla Gigafactory construction site In Grünheide near Berlin, September 3, 2020.
    Julian Stähle | picture alliance via Getty Images

    Elon Musk on Friday flatly denied a claim by the head of ex-President Donald Trump’s new social media company that Trump had encouraged Musk’s bid to buy Twitter.
    “This is false,” Musk tweeted in reply to a New York Post article about that claim by Trump Media & Technology Group CEO Devin Nunes.

    “I’ve had no communication, directly or indirectly, with Trump, who has publicly stated that he will be exclusively on Truth Social,” wrote Musk, head of Tesla and SpaceX.
    Nunes, during a televised appearance Wednesday on Fox Business, said that Trump’s social media app, Truth Social, was “all for” Musk’s move to buy Twitter and take it private with a $44 billion offer — a somewhat eyebrow-raising claim since Twitter is a competitor to Truth Social.

    “President Trump, basically before Elon Musk bought it, actually said to go and buy it because you know the goal of our company is really to build a community where people are in a family friendly, safe environment,” said Nunes, a former Republican congressman from California, during the appearance.
    Twitter banned Trump, who had been an obsessive user of the platform, in January 2021 for what the company said was the “risk of further incitement of violence.”
    The ban followed the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot by a mob of Trump supporters who disrupted the certification of President Joe Biden’s election.

    Trump announced plans to launch Truth Social as a competitor to Twitter last fall, and said his social media company would become publicly traded through a deal with the so-called blank-check company Digital World Acquisition.
    On April 25, Twitter accepted Musk’s offer to buy the company, which is contingent on approval from shareholders and regulators.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Nunes, during his interview on Fox Business, suggested that Trump’s purported urging of Musk to buy Twitter dovetailed with the mission of Truth Social.
    “That’s why we encouraged Elon Musk to buy it, because someone has to continue to take on these tech tyrants,” Nunes said. “Donald Trump wanted to make sure that the American people got their voice back and that the internet was open and that’s what we are doing.”
    “And so people like Elon Musk doing what he’s doing, you know we’re definitely in favor of it,” Nunes said.
    In late April, Trump told CNBC’s Joe Kernen that he would not return to Twitter even if Musk took over and reversed the ban on him.
    “No, I won’t be going back on Twitter,” said Trump, who had nearly 90 million followers on the platform before the ban.
    “I will be on Truth Social within the week. It’s on schedule. We have a lot of people signed up,” he said.
    “I like Elon Musk. I like him a lot. He’s an excellent individual. We did a lot for Twitter when I was in the White House. I was disappointed by the way I was treated by Twitter. I won’t be going back on Twitter,” Trump said.
    Statistics show that Trump, who as president had averaged upward of eight tweets per day in the last half of 2017 and the first half of 2018, steadily increased that average in the following years. He ended up with an average of 34 tweets per day in his last half year in office, before being banned.
    On Truth Social, Trump as of Friday had posted a so-called Truth or “ReTruthed” another user’s post less than 30 times combined over the past two months. Nearly all of those posts had been made in the past week.
    Correction: Devin Nunes is CEO of Trump Media & Technology Group. An earlier version misstated the company name.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Couples cut wedding expenses as inflation and demand make walking down the aisle pricier

    Couples in the U.S. are expected to host roughly 2.5 million weddings this year, a 30% increase from the prior year and a number not seen in four decades, according to The Wedding Report.
    Prices are surging, too. The average couple spent $27,063 on their wedding in 2021, up from $20,286 in 2020.
    Couples are getting creative to save money, while wedding vendors continue to face supply chain headwinds leading to shortages.

    Nicole Brandfon and her fiance Adam Alonso are planning a wedding in Colombia, rather than Miami, because it was more affordable.
    Source: Nicole Brandfon

    Nicole Brandfon and her fiance, Adam Alonso, will hop on a plane from Florida to South America early next year for a destination wedding. The international trip wasn’t their original plan, but it’s saving them money.
    The couple, engaged since last June, had been dreaming of holding their wedding in Miami, where they both work and reside. But as they started to plan, the duo quickly realized prices were out of reach and venue availability was slim to none for their intended time frame, either in late 2022 or early 2023.

    “We spent three or four months looking at a lot of different venues and realized that we weren’t going to be able to afford Miami,” said Brandfon, a 29-year-old account director at a public relations agency.
    Brandfon and Alonso’s decision to marry abroad is just one example of how couples are getting creative to contend with the rising costs of putting on a wedding. Vendors are overbooked with pent-up demand created by the Covid pandemic. They’re also facing supply chain headwinds leading to shortages. At the same time, inflation is driving up the cost of everything from food to labor.
    Read more: Surging prices force consumers to ask: Can I live without it?
    As a result, many couples are making trade-offs and rethinking priorities — opting for the dream wedding gown or the open bar over the extravagant floral arrangements.
    Brandfon and Alonso will say “I do” in February in the Caribbean coastal town of Cartagena, Colombia, at a fraction of the cost they were quoted closer to home. Now they’re able to have a wedding planner, and they intend to serve a variety of foods at a fully seated dinner, according to Brandfon. 

    “Florida, or anywhere in the U.S., really,” she said, “if we wanted anything extra it seemed like it was going to be another couple thousand dollars.”

    Cutting line items

    Nearly 7 million couples in the U.S. are expected to tie the knot in the next three years, according to industry research firm The Wedding Report. The pandemic delayed weddings for many of them and accelerated relationship timelines for others, spurring engagements between partners who spent more time together — and enjoyed the extra company — when lockdowns persisted.

    This year, couples are expected to host roughly 2.5 million weddings, a 30% increase from the prior year and a number not seen in four decades, according to The Wedding Report. In the next two years, the number is expected to taper off slightly, the national trade group says, but not by much. Americans are projected to plan 2.24 million weddings next year, and 2.17 million the year after.
    The amount that couples are spending to tie the knot keeps creeping up, too. In 2021, the average couple spent $27,063 on their wedding, according to The Wedding Report, up from about $24,700 per couple in 2019. In 2020, around the onset of the pandemic, many couples opted for smaller ceremonies with fewer frills and spent an average of $20,286.
    As celebrations roar back, couples are finding line items they can cut.
    More couples are choosing to host weekday weddings, said Kim Forrest, a senior editor at WeddingWire. That helps with limited venue availability, but it comes with a cost advantage, too: Some venues offer discounts for events to be held on less-frequented days in the middle of the week.
    The Biltmore Estate in Asheville, North Carolina, for example, charges a $10,000 facility fee for the property’s Deerpark venue for a Saturday wedding this fall. For a Friday or Sunday, the fee will run you $8,000.

    Guest counts are also up, and that’s going to cost more money.

    Shane McMurray
    founder of The Wedding Report

    Forrest also noted that weddings held in the South tend to be less expensive than those in the Northeast, with cities like Boston and New York driving up the national average.
    Prices on key wedding expenses are projected to be “much higher” this year than in recent years, in large part due to heightened food, labor and transportation costs, said Shane McMurray, founder of The Wedding Report. Plus, vendors that are seeing demand for bookings spike now have the ability to name their price, he said.
    “These are the things that people care about the most — the food and the bar, the photography services, and of course the venue,” he said. “Guest counts are also up, and that’s going to cost more money.”
    That means couples could make sacrifices elsewhere along the planning process, he said, which would be a loss for some vendors. Couples might deprioritize paying for a wedding planner, for example, so long as they don’t mind doing the extra work themselves.
    Couples spend less money, on average, on beauty and spa services, a ceremony officiant and party favors for their wedding guests, according to data from The Wedding Report. There’s more flexibility with these items to find less-costly options that will still get the job done, McMurray said. Add-ons like a photo booth or a videographer are commonly nixed altogether to stay within budget.

    ‘We’re going to have to take our prices up’

    Vendors feeling the squeeze are trying to be more accommodating, knowing that many couples feel crunched for time and cash.
    The 2022 wedding season is in “full bloom” on the heels of a pandemic-driven downturn, said Samira Araghi, founder and owner of San Francisco bridal boutique WildBride.
    That means bigger business for WildBride, which offers a selection of bohemian-inspired wedding gowns, from brands such as Pronovias and Willowby, through its website and at its one brick-and-mortar shop on Fillmore Street.
    There were moments during the pandemic where it felt as if society was opening back up again and couples were free to hold larger gatherings, she said. But it’s been a bumpy recovery thanks to new virus variants causing periodic spikes.
    “When the delta [variant] came, things got canceled again. And then when omicron came, things got canceled again,” she said. “Right now we’re definitely seeing a shift back to normal-sized weddings.”
    The most pressing issue that WildBride faces today is getting finished products through the mail, Araghi said, noting that many suppliers have shut down and that several fabrics, dresses and styles have been discontinued. “Supply chain issues are a big deal right now,” she said.

    WildBride, a bridal boutique located in San Francisco, is seeing an uptick in demand for its dresses coupled with heightened supply chain complications.
    Source: Buena Lane Photography

    In search of solutions, WildBride started to offer an “off-the-rack” selection during the pandemic. The dresses in the collection are either older styles or ones that could easily be bought in large batches from designers. Some of the dresses are discounted, depending on the condition.
    It’s become an appealing option for women planning a last-minute walk down the aisle or encountering logistical challenges while trying to secure another dress before the big day, Araghi said. It’s also an option for the more price-sensitive customer, so they don’t leave to shop elsewhere.
    Araghi said she hasn’t yet been forced to raise prices on items amid widespread inflation, although she’s aware that it’s happening at other vendors such as florists and jewelry shops.
    As shipping costs keep rising, though, she said it’s inevitable that the business will have to make adjustments — potentially before the end of the year.
    “I do think it’s going to happen that, yes, we’re going to have to take our prices up,” she said.

    Post-boom downswing?

    David’s Bridal Chief Executive Officer James Marcum doesn’t see the wedding boom nor consumers’ sensitivity to higher prices dissipating anytime soon. That’s why the company has been investing in its digital loyalty program and a vertically integrated supply chain, to be able to offer more perks and manufacture more dresses, he explained in a recent sit-down interview.
    Marcum said he has started to notice some brides showing a hesitancy to splurge thousands of dollars for a dress. The retailer has a fairly expansive selection, with prices ranging from $70 to $2,000.
    “You’re starting to hear rumblings about the budget sensitivity,” he said.
    Of course, that doesn’t mean the bride will forgo a dress altogether. She just might opt for a less-expensive option, Marcum said. “You’re still going to see a robust, brighter [wedding dress] business, but it’s really spreading over 2022 and 2023,” he said.
    Brides spent, on average, $1,499 on a wedding dress in 2021, according to The Wedding Report. That figure is expected to reach $1,527 this year, the report said.
    By 2024, The Wedding Report projects the number of nuptials held in the U.S. will fall closer to 2018 levels, at 2.14 million. Couples can rest assured that some venues might be easier to come by, by then. But it’s unclear where prices will stand.

    Victoria Cela and her fiance Ricardo Goudie are planning to wed in 2024.
    Source: Victoria Cela

    Victoria Cela, a 27-year-old account executive at a public affairs firm in Florida, is betting on a downswing.
    Cela and her fiance, Ricardo Goudie, became engaged in March. Instead of rushing to the altar, the couple is planning a wedding for early 2024 in order to give themselves enough time to save up money to cover the expenses, Cela said.
    “Our parents will be helping us, but we obviously want to pitch in as much as we can,” she said. “It’s a luxury because we have more time.”
    They plan to host their ceremony at a family member’s home in Coral Gables, just outside Miami, a choice that will allow them to put their money toward other things aside from the venue.
    Cela hopes vendors’ prices won’t be so lofty by then.
    “Every time I go on a website and gauge their prices, I’m like, ‘OK maybe we need to up the budget a little bit more,'” she said.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Used-car prices are down from record highs, easing the impact of inflation

    Cox Automotive said on Friday that its Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index, which tracks prices of used vehicles sold at its U.S. wholesale auctions, declined 1% in April from March.
    Wholesale vehicle prices have dropped 6.4% since the January record.
    However, prices are still extremely high, and the index remains up 14% from a year ago.

    A sign advertises cash paid for used cars in Alhambra, California on January 12, 2022.
    Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

    DETROIT – Wholesale used-vehicle prices have notably fallen from a record high set in January, signaling the worst of sky-high prices related to higher inflation in the U.S. may be behind us.
    Cox Automotive said on Friday that its Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index, which tracks prices of used vehicles sold at its U.S. wholesale auctions, declined 1% in April from March, marking the third straight month of declines from the first month of the year.

    “We clearly have returned to vehicles depreciating again. That’s a good news story for both inflation and for consumers looking to buy a vehicle,” Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive told CNBC.
    Wholesale vehicle prices have dropped 6.4% since the January record. However, prices are still extremely high, and the index remains up 14% from a year ago.
    The drop-off in pricing comes as Manheim estimates used retail sales declined 13% in April from March, suggesting demand is easing amid the record-high prices.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Automakers for more than a year now have been battling through a semiconductor chip shortage that has sporadically halted production of new vehicles, causing record-low inventories of vehicles and higher prices. The circumstances have pushed many buyers into the used-car market.
    Smoke expects used vehicle prices to remain elevated but return to “fairly normal patterns,” with the potential for a few modest price increases later in the year.

    “It’s potentially becoming a bit deflationary in that regard,” Smoke said, adding that doesn’t necessarily mean there’s going to a massive price correction. “This is not a commodity market that people are speculating, and used vehicles are assets that actually provide utility to folks.”
    “We had an unusual circumstance over the last two years that stimulated demand, and we have limited supply,” he said.
    Such declines are good news for the Biden administration, which has blamed much of the rising inflation rates in the country on the used vehicle market. In the past 20 years, used cars’ contribution to inflation averaged zero. In January, it contributed more than 1% on a year-over-year basis, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    Persistent inflation has sent prices rising to historic levels over the past year. The trend has been politically damaging for the Biden administration and has stoked fears of “stagflation,” an unwanted mix of rising prices and stagnant economic growth.
     – CNBC’s Kevin Breuninger contributed to this report.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Cramer’s week ahead: Own recession-proof names and have cash ready for when stocks ‘come roaring back’

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Friday that enduring the current market is a waiting game for a rally — and investors need to be prepared for when that happens.
    “Your portfolio should be split among some cash and some stocks that can thrive in a recession,” the “Mad Money” host said. 

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Friday that enduring the current market is a waiting game for a rally — and investors need to be prepared for when that happens.
    “Your portfolio should be split among some cash and some stocks that can thrive in a recession. … You need to accept the fact that we’re simply trying to stay in the game until times get better,” the “Mad Money” host said. 

    “But when we do reach the promised land, it’ll be worth it, because that’s when stocks come roaring back,” he added.
    The market concluded a bumpy week of trading on Friday. While the market rallied on Wednesday afternoon following the Federal Reserve’s decision to raise interest rates by 50 basis points, losses on Thursday and Friday demolished those gains. A basis point equals 0.01%.
    Cramer said he will be watching for the April consumer price index release next week. “If we do get a weaker CPI figure, the market could rally,” he said.
    He also previewed next week’s earnings slate. All earnings and revenue estimates are courtesy of FactSet.
    Monday: Tyson Foods, BioNTech

    Tyson Foods

    Q2 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 9 a.m. ET
    Projected EPS: $1.89
    Projected revenue: $12.84 billion

    Cramer said he’s hoping for any news indicating that food prices are coming down.
    BioNTech

    Q1 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 8 a.m. ET
    Projected EPS: $9.65
    Projected revenue: $4.57 billion

    Insight into any developments regarding China’s Covid-19 vaccination plans would be helpful, Cramer said.
    Tuesday: Peloton, Roblox, RealReal
    Peloton

    Q3 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET
    Projected loss: 84 cents per share
    Projected revenue: $969 million

    “I bet we’ll eventually see some sort of ‘WeCrashed’-like TV series about Peloton — if not ‘The Dropout’ — and I wonder who’s going to write the screenplay first,” ‘The Mad Money’ host said, referring to the television dramas detailing scandals at WeWork and Theranos, respectively.
    Roblox

    Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call on Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. ET
    Projected loss: 23 cents per share
    Projected sales: $659 million

    “Fantastic company, bad stock. … We keep it in the penalty box that all things [metaverse] belong in right now,” Cramer said.
    RealReal

    Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call at 5 p.m. ET
    Projected loss: 54 cents per share
    Projected revenue: $136 million

    Cramer said he doesn’t understand why the stock is down.
    Wednesday: Wendy’s, Rivian
    Wendy’s

    Q1 2022 before the bell; conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET
    Projected EPS: 18 cents
    Projected revenue: $497 million

    Cramer said he’s interested in hearing whether the company is having staffing issues at its restaurants like others in the industry.
    Rivian 

    Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call at 5 p.m. ET
    Projected loss: $1.41 per share
    Projected revenue: $133 million

    Cramer said he wants to know if Rivian will allow Ford to sell its stake in the electric vehicle maker.
    Thursday: Toast, Poshmark
    Toast 

    Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call at 5 p.m. ET
    Projected loss: 13 cents per share
    Projected revenue: $487 million

    Cramer said that he is “anti-Toast” because there are too many players in the restaurant point-of-sale management space.
    Poshmark 

    Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call at 4:45 p.m. ET
    Projected loss: 25 cents per share
    Projected revenue: $87.6 million

    Cramer said he’ll tune in to hear about the company, which he said hurt investors who bought its stock.
    Disclosure: Cramer’s Charitable Trust owns shares of Ford.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Judge dismisses Trump lawsuit seeking to lift Twitter ban

    A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by former President Donald Trump seeking to lift his ban from Twitter.
    The social media giant had banned Trump in January 2021, citing the risk of the incitement of further violence on the heels of the Capitol riot by a mob of supporters of the then-president.
    Trump had been an avid user of Twitter before being barred by the app.

    Former President Donald Trump
    Tom Brenner | Reuters

    A judge on Friday dismissed a lawsuit by former President Donald Trump seeking to lift his ban from Twitter.
    But San Francisco federal district court Judge James Donato left the door open for Trump and other plaintiffs to file an amended complaint against Twitter that is consistent with his written decision Friday to toss the lawsuit in its entirety.

    The social media giant had banned Trump on Jan. 8, 2021, citing the risk of the incitement of further violence on the heels of the Capitol riot by a mob of supporters of the then-president two days earlier.
    Trump, the American Conservative Union, and five individuals had sued Twitter and its co-founder Jack Dorsey last year on behalf of themselves and a class of other Twitter users who had been booted from the app.
    Donato’s ruling comes nearly two weeks after Trump told CNBC he had no interest in returning to Twitter even if his ban were to be lifted by Elon Musk, the Tesla chief whose $44 billion offer to buy Twitter has been accepted by the company’s board.
    Before the ban, Trump was an avid Twitter user, tweeting an average of more than 30 posts per day toward the end of his presidency. At the time of the ban, Trump had nearly 90 million followers on Twitter.
    His suit alleged that Twitter violated the plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights to free speech, arguing that the bans were due to pressure on the company by Democratic members of Congress.

    But in his 17-page ruling, Donato wrote that Trump and the other plaintiffs “are not starting from a position of strength” with their First Amendment claim.
    The judge noted, citing federal case law, that, “Twitter is a private company, and ‘the First Amendment applies only to governmental abridgements of speech, and not to alleged abridgements by private companies.’ ”
    Donato rejected the notion that Twitter’s ban of Trump and the others was attributable to the government’s actions, which would be the only way to uphold the claim of a violation of the First Amendment.
    “Overall, the amended complaint does not plausibly allege that Twitter acted as a government entity when it closed plaintiffs’ accounts,” Donato wrote.
    The suit also asked the judge to rule that the federal Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional.
    The CDA says online service providers such as Twitter cannot be held responsible for content posted by others.
    Donato dismissed that claim after finding that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to challenge the CDA. The judge said the only way they could have such standing was to show that Twitter “would not have de-platformed the plaintiff” or others but for the legal immunity conferred by the CDA when it came to content.
    Donato dismissed a third claim, that Twitter had violated the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices again because Trump and the other plaintiffs agreed that California law would govern disputes between Twitter and its users, as Twitter’s terms of service states.
    The lawsuit had originally been filed in federal court in Florida, where Trump lives, and then was transferred to California at the request of Twitter, which is headquartered there.
    Lastly, the judge dismissed a fourth claim of the suit, made under Florida’s Stop Social Media Censorship Act.
    The judge said that only one named plaintiff in the case, Dominick Latella, had an active Twitter account at the time Florida’s law took effect on July 1, 2021, and so is the only plaintiff who could conceivably have a claim under the law.
    “There is also a major concern about the enforceability of the SSMCA,” Donato wrote.
    “Florida government officials were enjoined from enforcing the SSMCA on June 30, 2021, the day before the law was to take effect, in a well-reasoned decision issued by the Northern District of Florida,” which found the law violated the First Amendment, the judge wrote.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Peloton, Under Armour, Monster Beverage and more

    A Peloton exercise bike is seen after the ringing of the opening bell for the company’s IPO at the Nasdaq Market site in New York City, New York, U.S., September 26, 2019.
    Shannon Stapleton | Reuters

    Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading Friday.
    Peloton — Shares of Peloton dropped 7.7% after The Wall Street Journal reported the at-home fitness company is looking for potential investors to take a minority stake in it in the realm of 15% to 20%. The company has struggled with post-pandemic demand on top of brand issues, supply chain challenges and a change in CEO. It will report quarterly results next week.

    Monster Beverage — Shares rose 4.4% after Monster Beverage’s first-quarter revenue beat Wall Street estimates. Monster reported revenue of $1.52 billion versus $1.43 billion expected, according to StreetAccount. First-quarter earnings per share came in slightly weaker than expected.
    Cigna — Shares jumped 5.9% after the insurance company’s quarterly earnings beat expectations. Cigna reported earnings of $6.01 per share, compared with a $5.18 forecasted by analysts surveyed by Refinitiv. The insurance company reported revenue of $44.1 billion, compared to consensus estimates of $43.4 billion. Cigna reported growth in its pharmacy benefits management business.
    NRG Energy — Shares jumped 9.8% after the company released its latest quarterly figures. NRG Energy reported a quarterly profit of $7.17 per share on revenue of $7.9 billion. However, it wasn’t clear if those numbers were comparable with FactSet estimates.
    Under Armour — Shares of the sneaker and apparel company fell 25.9% after Under Armour reported an unexpected loss and shared revenue that fell below analyst estimates, as it attempts to overcome global supply chain problems. Under Armour also issued a disappointing outlook for 2023 fiscal year.
    Illumina — Shares plunged 14.6% despite the biotechnology company reporting better-than-expected results for the previous quarter. Illumina reported a quarterly profit of $1.07 per share on revenues of $1.223 billion. Analysts polled by StreetAccount were expecting earnings of 90 cents per share on revenues of $1.219 billion.

    News Corporation — The media company’s stock tumbled 13.7% following the release of quarterly results that were mostly in line with expectations. News Corporation reported a quarterly profit of 16 cents per share on revenues of $2.5 billion. Analysts were expecting earnings of 15 cents per share on revenues of $2.5 billion, according to consensus estimates from StreetAccount.
    DraftKings — Shares dropped 8.9%, giving back a gain from earlier in the day. DraftKings reported a loss of $1.10 per share on revenues of $417 million. Analysts surveyed by Refinitiv were expecting a loss of $1.15 per share on revenues of $412 million. DraftKings also raised its full-year revenue guidance in its quarterly report.
    — CNBC’s Tanaya Macheel, Hannah Miao and Samantha Subin contributed reporting.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More