More stories

  • in

    Women in low-paying jobs are losing billions as U.S. gender pay gap persists, Labor Department says

    Overrepresentation of women in low-paying jobs is a major driver of the wage gap.
    Economists call this dynamic “occupational segregation.”
    Black women lost $39.3 billion in potential wages in 2019. Hispanic women missed out on $46.7 billion.

    Women rally to demand equal pay for women and an end to the wage gap .
    Creative Touch Imaging Ltd. | NurPhoto | Getty Images

    Women in low-paying industries, particularly Black and Hispanic women, are losing billions of dollars every year, which exacerbates an already stark gender pay gap in the U.S., according to a new analysis by the Labor Department.
    The report, released Tuesday, ranks the nation’s top 20 jobs with the highest median income. Only one — nurse practitioner — is dominated by women. Nine of them are more than 75% male, and the rest are relatively evenly split between men and women. However, eight of the jobs with the lowest pay are predominantly held by women.

    Economists call this dynamic “occupational segregation,” and Black and Hispanic women are especially susceptible. The Labor Department estimated that differences in industry and job concentration cost Black women $39.3 billion in potential wages in 2019. For Hispanic women, the total was even greater, at $46.7 billion.
    “Occupational segregation is bad for a lot of different reasons,” said Sarah Jane Glynn, a senior advisor at the Labor Department’s Women’s Bureau and one of the authors of the report. “It stifles individual potential, but it also inhibits innovation. It makes the labor force less adaptable to changes, and it obviously has impacts on individual families’ economic security, but also their ability to spend back into the economy.”
    The new data coincides with Equal Pay Day, which is held annually on March 15 to mark the additional time it takes the average woman to earn what the average man made by the end of the previous year. According to government data, a woman who worked full-time in 2020 was paid 82% of the wages of a man who worked full-time.
    Private analysis shows the gap persists despite women’s increasing levels of education. A new report by Payscale, a compensation management firm, found women with master’s degrees in business earned only 76 cents for every dollar made by a male with an MBA. Female lawyers make 89% of the salary of their male counterparts. 
    “[W]ith the pressure of rising wage inflation, minimum wage increases, and strong competition for talent, we can expect more pay compression and pay inequity issues to arise,” said Ruth Thomas, pay equity strategist at Payscale.

    The Labor Department has found that 42% of the wage gap is the result of occupational segregation, which was exacerbated by the pandemic. Women are heavily employed in many front-line industries that were hit hard by the lockdowns. And within those sectors, women were more likely to get laid off.
    For example, women made up 44% of the workers in retail in 2019 but accounted for 50% of the layoffs in 2020. The disparity was even worse for Black women: They represented 6% of retail employees but made up 15% of the job losses. 
    In education and health, 75% of the workers were women in 2019 and 79% of the jobs cut in 2020. And Black and Hispanic women bore a disproportionate share of those losses. 
    “These jobs in these sectors are devalued because of the folks who are doing the work,” Glynn said. “It’s the fact that it’s women — and often what color who are doing this labor — that has been shown to directly lead to its devaluation. And this is part of the reason why occupational segregation contributes to the wage gap.”
    Labor officials pointed to a wide swath of social factors that contribute to occupational segregation ranging from unequal child care responsibilities to a lack of networks and mentors to workplace discrimination. On Tuesday, the White House will issue a new regulation that would ban the use of prior salary history in the federal hiring process in hopes of diminishing the wage gap. President Joe Biden is also slated to sign an executive order encouraging pay equity and transparency among federal contractors. 
    One potential silver lining for the future: Occupational segregation is slowly declining with each generation. But Glynn said it could still take years to determine how the recovery from the pandemic and the current tight labor market might reshape the workplace for women.
    “It does appear that over time we’re seeing less gender differentiation in terms of jobs that folks are taking, but it’s certainly not disappearing entirely,” she said.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Work at a small employer? You likely pay high 401(k) fees

    The smallest 401(k) plans charge fees of 0.88% a year, while the largest charge 0.41%, according to Morningstar research.
    Those fees are levied annually as a percentage of a worker’s total savings. The extra costs can amount to a lot of money.

    Yongyuan | E+ | Getty Images

    Workers who save in a 401(k) plan offered by a small business pay fees that are twice as high as those paid by employees who work at the largest companies in the U.S.
    The smallest workplace retirement plans (those with less than $25 million in aggregate savings) charge total fees of 0.88% a year, while the largest (those with more than $500 million) charge 0.41% annually, according to a Morningstar Center for Retirement and Policy Studies report.

    Workers pay these 401(k) fees annually to financial firms like investment managers and plan administrators. The fees are automatically withdrawn from workers’ accounts as a percentage of their total savings.

    “The U.S. [retirement] system does not work nearly as well for people who are not fortunate enough to work for larger, established employers,” said the study’s authors, Aron Szapiro, head of retirement studies and public policy, and Lia Mitchell, senior policy research analyst.
    The study looks at median fees (those right in the middle of a group) in 2019, the most recent year of complete federal data. Many plans within size groups carry fees both lower and higher than the median.
    More than 30% of the smallest plans have total costs exceeding 1% a year, according to Morningstar.
    The difference between small and large plans can amount to a lot of money over decades of saving for retirement.

    More from Personal Finance:Other retirees could take Tom Brady’s cue and return to the workforceWhy the Federal Reserve raises interest rates to combat inflationCars leased in 2019 are now worth $7,200 more than expected
    “Workers at employers with smaller plans who are saving just as much as those at employers with larger plans could have around 10% less in assets at retirement because of higher fees,” Szapiro said.
    Employers with so-called “mega” plans can negotiate much lower fees from investment managers and other service providers than businesses with small 401(k) plans. They’ve also been more likely to adopt investments other than mutual funds that tend to be lower-cost.
    There are just 2,115 employers offering so-called “mega” plans (those with more than $500 million). But their plans account for a big portion (43%) of all 401(k) investors, according to Morningstar.

    Meanwhile, there are 649,000 small plans (with less than $25 million), but they account for 27% of all 401(k) savers, Morningstar found.
    (The remaining savers fall somewhere in the middle of small and mega plans.)
    While many workers have access to a low-cost 401(k) plan at work, the data speaks to a fragmented system that relies heavily on the largest businesses to succeed.
    “The jobs of the future may not be with employers who offer these savings opportunities,” according to Szapiro and Mitchell. “Moreover, this concentration underscores that policymakers must maintain incentives that these large employers find attractive.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Eligible taxpayers can claim earned income tax credit in these states

    In 2021, more than a dozen states added or expanded earned income tax credits, a write-off for low- to moderate-income families.
    Generally, working families with children earning roughly $42,000 to $57,000 qualify for state EITCs, depending on marital status and family size.
    “Overall, it’s a relatively well-targeted form of tax relief,” said Katherine Loughead, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation.

    Valeriy_G | iStock | Getty Images

    Flush with cash, more than two dozen states enacted tax breaks in 2021, including earned income tax credits, or EITCs, a boon for low to moderate earners. 
    Generally, working families with children earning roughly $42,000 to $57,000 qualify for state EITCs, depending on marital status and family size, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, with the largest benefit typically going to those making around $11,000 to $25,000.

    “State EITCs cost a heck of a lot less than rate cuts because only so many people benefit from them,” said Richard Auxier, senior policy associate at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
    More from Personal Finance:Cash-rich states create ‘competitive environment’ with flurry of tax cutsRetirees likely shielded from inflation hit on these expensesThe IRS has sent nearly 30 million refunds. This is the average payment
    In 2021, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon and Washington, added or expanded EITCs, with some going into effect for future tax years, according to the Tax Policy Center.
    While the federal EITC is refundable, meaning it reduces tax bills or provides a refund regardless of liability, some state-level EITCs are nonrefundable, covering only up to taxes owed.

    “The earned income tax credit is a great tool for states to use to help lower-income workers because they get to piggyback off the work of the federal government,” Auxier said.

    Workers may receive the federal EITC based on earnings, phasing out above certain income levels, and the state-level tax breaks are typically a percentage of the federal credit, following the same eligibility rules.
    “They just copy and paste the federal rules, stick them in the state tax code, and then give a percentage of the amount of money that they got from the federal credit,” he said.
    However, every state is different and the latest round of changes may vary, Auxier said.
    For example, refundable credits may range from 3% in Montana to 50% in Maryland, according to the IRS. There’s also an earned income tax credit in New York City worth up to 5% of the federal credit.
    Still, policy experts say these state-level changes may offer much-needed relief at tax time.

    Overall, it’s a relatively well-targeted form of tax relief.

    Katherine Loughead
    Senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation

    Low-wage workers have been among the hardest hit during the pandemic, said Samantha Waxman, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
    “These folks have been more likely to lose their jobs and their income due to Covid-19,” she said. “Or if they work as front-line essential workers and have been able to keep their jobs, they tend to have higher infection risk.”
    Retail, healthcare and food services are among the most common industries for EITC-eligible workers. 

    “Overall, it’s a relatively well-targeted form of tax relief,” said Katherine Loughead, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation. “It’s means-tested in a way that benefits those most in need, while also encouraging participation in the labor force.”

    Federal EITC boost for 2021

    The American Rescue Plan expanded the federal EITC through 2021, allowing more workers without children to qualify. The boost also lifted age limits, making the credit available to younger workers. 
    President Joe Biden called for making these changes permanent in the American Families Plan, which could provide $12.4 billion to families in 2022, affecting 19.5 million workers, according to research from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. However, the status of this proposal is unclear. 

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Microsoft dives into Web3 with investment in Ethereum co-founder's start-up ConsenSys

    ConsenSys has raised $450 million in a funding round backed by the likes of Microsoft, SoftBank and Temasek.
    The investment more than doubles ConsenSys’ valuation to $7 billion.
    Tech giants from Microsoft to Twitter are becoming increasingly interested in Web3, a movement that calls for a more decentralized internet based on the blockchain.

    Joseph Lubin, co-founder of Ethereum.
    Adam Jeffery | CNBC

    Blockchain start-up ConsenSys has raised $450 million in a new round of funding that more than doubles its valuation to $7 billion.
    The cash injection was led by ParaFi Capital, ConsenSys said Tuesday, with Microsoft, Japan’s SoftBank and Singapore’s Temasek also joining as new investors in the company.

    New York-headquartered ConsenSys was founded in 2014 by Joseph Lubin, a co-founder of Ethereum. Ethereum is the blockchain platform behind ether, the world’s second-biggest cryptocurrency.
    Whereas bitcoin is mostly used for transactions, Ethereum can be used to create decentralized applications, or dapps — think Facebook or TikTok, but on the blockchain, a shared record-keeping system for crypto transactions. ConsenSys develops software that runs on the Ethereum network.

    It marks a rare crypto-related bet from Microsoft. The company previously led an early-stage investment in Palm NFT Studio, a start-up also co-founded by Lubin.
    Microsoft’s involvement highlights growing interest from the world’s largest tech firms in Web3, a loosely-defined term that refers to efforts to create a decentralized version of the internet based on blockchain technology.
    It’s a term that has attracted a lot of chatter — and money — in Silicon Valley. Blockchain start-ups raised a record $25 billion in venture capital funding globally last year, according to CB Insights data. Other tech giants exploring Web3 include Facebook-parent Meta and Twitter.

    ConsenSys is viewed by investors as one of the companies that will power Web3. It’s benefited from a flood of investment into emerging crypto trends such as decentralized finance, or DeFi, and nonfungible tokens, otherwise known as NFTs.
    The company’s most popular products include the MetaMask cryptocurrency wallet and Infura, a suite of tools that helps developers create Ethereum apps.
    MetaMask allows people to store and manage their tokens through a web browser extension or a mobile app. People can also access popular blockchain-powered apps like Uniswap and Axie Infinity. The bulk of ConsenSys’ revenues currently comes from fees for trading different tokens on MetaMask.

    Read more about cryptocurrencies from CNBC Pro

    MetaMask topped 30 million monthly active users in January, ConsenSys said, up 42% in the last four months. The U.S., Philippines, Brazil, Germany and Nigeria are its most active markets. Infura, meanwhile, is used by over 430,000 developers and recently topped $1 trillion in annualized transaction volumes.
    ConsenSys said all the proceeds from its latest round would be converted into ether. The funds will go toward hiring 600 more employees, a redesign of MetaMask slated for release later this year, and building out ConsenSys’ growing NFT business.

    Web3 hype

    Just as Web3 has generated a lot of hype, it’s also drawn some notable critics, including tech billionaires Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey.
    Dorsey dismissed Web3 as a centralized technology owned by venture capitalists rather than the crypto community, while Musk says he thinks it’s more “buzzword” than reality.
    For his part, Lubin doesn’t see it that way.
    “What Jack may be concerned about is how a small number of VCs are grabbing the lion’s share of equity or tokens in many of the best projects,” ConsenSys’ CEO said. “I’m not concerned at all.”

    “Decentralized protocol technology is anti-fragile, as is its global community,” Lubin added. “The community will interpret centralization as suboptimal and an opportunity, and will relentlessly decentralize.”

    U.S. regulation

    The crypto world has also been keeping a close watch on regulatory developments out of the U.S., after President Joe Biden issued an executive order calling for a coordinated response from the government to industry oversight.
    Bitcoin, ether and other digital tokens initially reacted positively, only to subsequently turn south as investors grew concerned by a lack of detail in Biden’s plan.
    The U.S. government “has a big policy decision on its hands,” Lubin said, adding ConsenSys “is ready and eager to assist policymakers however we can.”
    “At the end of the day, permissionless blockchain networks are global, and they will grow and change our everyday lives whether or not the U.S. is a leader,” he added.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    How the stock market ‘fear index’ works

    The volatility index, also known as the VIX, essentially takes a reading of the stock market’s blood pressure, measuring investors’ fear.
    The VIX can spike when investor concerns are heightened by events like the raising of interest rates by the Federal Reserve or the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Investors can use the VIX to help them make buying and selling decisions.

    The volatility index, also known as the VIX, essentially takes a reading of the stock market’s blood pressure, measuring investors’ fear.
    The VIX can spike when investor concerns are heightened by events like the raising of interest rates by the Federal Reserve or the Covid-19 pandemic.

    “It’s just a unique tool that we can actually quantify that [concern],” Lindsey Bell, chief markets and money strategist at Ally Financial, told CNBC.
    The VIX is a forward-looking index that weighs volatility based on trading in S&P 500 options.
    “It’s measuring implied volatility over the next 30 days, and that’s derived from option activity,” said Jason Snipe, founder and chief investment officer at Odyssey Capital Advisors. “That’s the catalyst for what moves [the VIX] in either direction.”
    Investors can use the VIX to help them make buying and selling decisions, or they can indirectly invest in it.
    “The most important thing is having a plan for whatever you are investing for, whether you are a trader or an investor,” said Tiffany McGhee, chief investment officer and CEO of Pivotal Advisors.

    Watch the video above to learn more about how the VIX measures fear, the mechanics behind implied volatility and why it matters to investor portfolios.
    SIGN UP: Money 101 is an 8-week learning course to financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. For the Spanish version Dinero 101, click here.
    CHECK OUT: The ‘old convention’ for saving in retirement won’t work anymore, expert says: Here’s how to shift your strategy with Acorns+CNBC
    Disclosure: NBCUniversal and Comcast Ventures are investors in Acorns. More

  • in

    Airlines raise revenue outlook as travel demand bounces back faster than expected

    Delta, United and Southwest say bookings came in ahead of expectations after the omicron wave subsided.
    All three carriers are facing higher fuel prices, their biggest expense after labor.

    American Airlines planes at LaGuardia Airport
    Leslie Josephs | CNBC

    Travel demand has bounced back faster than expected this year, airlines said Tuesday, a welcome rebound for an industry battered by Covid and a sign that carriers will be able to pass along higher fuel prices and other costs to customers this year.
    U.S. jet fuel prices last week spiked to their highest level since 2008 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which sparked worries about scarcer crude supplies as countries sanctioned the oil producer. Though jet fuel prices have eased, they’re still up 35% so far this year.

    Delta Air Lines said it expects revenue to make up for “more than 100%” of the jump in fuel prices during the second quarter. The Atlanta-based carrier reiterated that bookings said bookings are outpacing 2019.
    Ahead of an investor presentation Delta said it expects first-quarter sales to come in at 78% of 2019 levels, up from a forecast in January for a recovery of as little as 72% of 2019 levels.
    Airlines have been comparing revenue and capacity to 2019 to show how much they have recovered since before the pandemic.
    United Airlines said it expects first-quarter revenue to “be near the better end” of guidance for a 75% to 80% recovery from three years earlier.
    Shares of the carriers rose 6% apiece in premarket trading.

    “System bookings for future travel have improved close to 40 points since the first week of 2022 and business traffic has increased more than 30 points since the peak of the Omicron impact in January 2022,” United said in a filing.
    American Airlines said it expects first-quarter revenue to be off 17% from 2019, better than its January forecast for a two-year drop of as much as 22%.
    Southwest Airlines raised its revenue outlook to as much as 92% recovered from 2019 levels. Southwest and American shares were each up more than 4%.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Movie theater chain AMC just bought a stake in a Nevada gold miner, sending the penny stock soaring

    Movie theater chain AMC Entertainment has agreed to purchase a major stake in a Nevada gold and silver miner.
    AMC will spend $27.9 million in cash for the deal, receiving roughly 23.4 million shares for the company, Hycroft Mining Holding Corp., and an equal amount of stock warrants.
    The deal would make AMC the owner of roughly 22% of Hycroft.

    Adam Aron, AMC Entertainment president and CEO.
    David Orrell | CNBC

    Movie theater chain AMC Entertainment has agreed to purchase a major stake in a Nevada gold and silver miner, the companies announced Tuesday, an unusual expansion for the one-time meme stock.
    AMC will spend $27.9 million in cash for the deal, receiving roughly 23.4 million shares for the company, Hycroft Mining Holding Corp., and an equal amount of stock warrants. The deal would make AMC the owner of roughly 22% of Hycroft.

    Hycroft shares nearly doubled in premarket trading. AMC shares, which are down 50% this year alone, gained 3.2% in premarket trading.
    AMC CEO Adam Aron, in a release explaining the move, cited the recent success of theatrical releases “Spider-Man: No Way Home” and “The Batman,” as well as positive forecasts for the box office this year. He also drew parallels between his company and the miner.
    “Our strategic investment being announced today is the result of our having identified a company in an unrelated industry that appears to be just like AMC of a year ago,” he said. “It, too, has rock-solid assets, but for a variety of reasons, it has been facing a severe and immediate liquidity issue. Its share price has been knocked low as a result. We are confident that our involvement can greatly help it to surmount its challenges — to its benefit, and to ours.”
    AMC’s stock emerged as one of the main “meme stocks” last year, surging as an army of retail investors bought into shares of companies that were heavily shorted by hedge funds. Aron has embraced the new shareholders, including offering popcorn deals for owners of the company.
    The company has also used its newfound popularity to raise billions in additional capital, with Aron saying some of that money would be used for strategic acquisitions. Aron has sold tens of millions of dollars of his own shares in AMC, which he has attributed to estate planning. AMC is also experimenting with a new pricing model that charges more for certain movies.

    In addition to AMC, the same number of shares and warrants in Hycroft is being purchased by metals investor Eric Sprott. Hycroft said in its release that investment vehicle Sprott Private Resource Lending II has agreed to extend the maturity of its debt to May 2027 from May 2025.
    As part of the deal, Hycroft will no longer be required to make regular principal payments on that debt and will instead be expected to pay it all back in a single “bullet” payment in 2027, according to a securities filing.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Investor group led by Trillium urges Starbucks to adopt neutral policy toward union efforts

    Several investors, led by Trillium Asset Management, are urging Starbucks to adopt a global policy of neutrality for all current and future attempts of its workers to organize.
    They also want Starbucks to reach “fair and timely” collective bargains with workers who vote to join the union.
    The group, which overall has more than $3.4 trillion in assets under management or advisement, says it holds at least $1.2 billion in Starbucks stock.

    Michelle Eisen, a barista at the Buffalo, NY, Elmwood Starbucks location, the first Starbuck location to unionize, helps out the local Starbucks Workers United, employees of a local Starbucks, as they gather at a local union hall to cast votes to unionize or not, Wednesday, Feb. 16, 2022, in Mesa, Ariz.
    Ross D. Franklin | AP

    Several investors, led by Trillium Asset Management, are urging Starbucks to adopt a global policy of neutrality for all current and future attempts of its workers to organize. They also want Starbucks to reach “fair and timely” collective bargains with workers who vote to join the union.
    In a letter to Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson and Chair Mellody Hobson, the coalition of more than 75 investors warns of reputational risk for the coffee giant, citing growing public support for unions.

    The outreach comes ahead of Starbucks’ annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday and includes signatories Trillium, SOC Investment Group, Parnassus Investments and New York City Comptroller Brad Lander. The group, which overall has more than $3.4 trillion in assets under management or advisement, says it holds at least $1.2 billion in Starbucks stock. This is the second such letter it has sent to the company’s CEO, the group said.
    “We believe the way Starbucks has responded to union organizing activities suggests a departure from international norms and standards as well as from its commitments to them. Our concerns include Starbucks’ activities at stores that have organized after the Buffalo election such as alleged retaliatory termination of employees and continued captive audience meetings,” the letter says.
    Starbucks did not immediately respond to request for comment.
    To date, more than 130 Starbucks stores in 26 states have petitioned the National Labor Relations Board to unionize, according to organizers Starbucks Workers United. Of the seven stores that have held elections, six cafes have sided with the union. Five of those locations are in the Buffalo, New York, market, where the unionization efforts began last summer, and the other cafe is in Mesa, Arizona.
    Starbucks has maintained that marketwide votes are appropriate as opposed to single-store counts so that all workers would be able to participate. So far, the NLRB has rejected that premise.

    Starbucks Workers United has accused the company of retaliation and union-busting tactics, which the company has denied. Last week, the organizers said they filed an unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB, claiming Starbucks has cut workers’ hours as retaliation and financial punishment for organizing or supporting the union, which the company has also denied.
    “The company has spent decades working to improve its ESG profile, build its reputation on environmental, social, and governance factors. We are really concerned that they are putting their reputation at risk,” Jonas Kron, chief advocacy officer at Trillium, told CNBC in an interview.
    “Now they have to choose, they can keep down a path of respecting their workers by allowing free and fair elections by adopting this policy of neutrality … but if they don’t do it, then they’re going to risk burning all that goodwill they’ve built over the years,” said Lander, the New York City comptroller.
    The coalition argues that respecting the union is in Starbucks’ best interest for productivity and growth.
    “We believe that when workers’ rights are ensured, their interests represented, and their needs properly communicated, companies and workers alike benefit. Benefits may include lower turnover, more resilient and risk-tolerant operations, more effective feedback loops, higher employee satisfaction and productivity, and, in turn, higher quality and more innovative products and services,” the investors write in the letter.
    “Customers have a choice, and this is going to be the one,” Dieter Waizenegger, executive director of SOC Investment Group, told CNBC. “The company should work very hard to make sure that it keeps its reputation as a people-positive company, and I think that should include really being a good partner to its partners.”
    Starbucks shares closed down over 4% Monday and are down over 32% year to date.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More