More stories

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: Campbell Soup, Express, Thor Industries and others

    Check out the companies making headlines before the bell:
    Campbell Soup (CPB) – The food producer matched estimates with adjusted quarterly earnings of 69 cents per share, and revenue essentially in line with forecasts as well. Campbell’s adjusted gross margins slid 340 basis points due to cost inflation. It said demand trends are strong and the company maintained its full-year guidance issued in December. Campbell rose 1% in premarket trading.

    Express (EXPR) – The apparel and accessories retailer’s shares rallied 10.5% in the premarket despite a wider-than-expected quarterly loss. Express saw better-than-expected sales and a comparable-store sales increase of 43%, more than double the consensus FactSet estimate.
    Thor Industries (THO) – The recreational vehicle maker saw its shares jump 8.6% in premarket trading after it reported quarterly earnings of $4.79 per share, compared with the $3.39 consensus estimate. Revenue also topped forecasts as the company cut back on discounts and expanded its profit margins.
    Amazon.com (AMZN) – The House Judiciary Committee is asking the Justice Department to start a criminal probe of Amazon, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke to the Wall Street Journal and a letter seen by the paper. The letter accuses Amazon of failing to provide information related to the examination of the company’s competitive practices. Amazon rose 1.5% in premarket action.
    PepsiCo (PEP) – The beverage and snack giant suspended the sale of its soda brands in Russia, although it will continue to sell potato chips and various daily essentials like baby formula. The Wall Street Journal said PepsiCo is currently exploring various options for its Russian unit, including writing off the value of that business.
    Stitch Fix (SFIX) – Stitch Fix tumbled 26.4% in the premarket after it issued weaker-than-expected sales guidance and said it continues to face challenges in getting customers to sign up for its styling service. Stitch Fix matched estimates with a quarterly loss of 28 cents per share, while the clothing styling company’s revenue topped forecasts.

    Bumble (BMBL) – Bumble soared 22% in premarket trading after the dating service operator reported an adjusted quarterly profit of 13 cents per share, beating estimates of a breakeven quarter. the company also forecasts strong 2022 growth.
    Gannett (GCI) – The USA Today publisher misled advertisers about where their website ads were being placed for 9 months, according to research obtained by the Wall Street Journal. Gannett told the Journal it inadvertently provided incorrect information to advertisers and regrets the error. Gannett fell 2% in premarket action.
    XPO Logistics (XPO) – The trucking and transportation company will split off its brokered transportation services unit into a separate company, and plans to divest its European business and its North American intermodal operation. XPO surged 13.3% in the premarket.
    General Electric (GE) – GE shares gained 1.6% in premarket trading after the company’s board of directors authorized a $3 billion share repurchase program.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stitch Fix stock heads to all-time low as styling service's future growth is in doubt

    Stitch Fix on Tuesday revealed a bleak outlook for its fiscal third quarter and slashed its forecast for the full year.
    Chief Executive Elizabeth Spaulding tried to convince analysts during a conference call that the company’s longer-term strategy remains in tact.
    Investors, however, aren’t so sure, as they send the stock toward an all-time low.

    The Stitch Fix logo on a smartphone arranged in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, U.S., on Saturday, June 5, 2021. Stitch Fix Inc. is scheduled to release earning on June 7.
    Tiffany Hagler-Geard | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Americans are getting dressed up again. But that doesn’t mean all apparel retailers are going to be beneficiaries of post-pandemic wardrobe refreshes.
    Stitch Fix is the latest example of this. Its shares are on pace to open at an all-time low Wednesday morning, should they fall below $10.29.

    After the company on Tuesday evening revealed a bleak outlook for its fiscal third quarter and slashed its forecast for the full year, Stitch Fix Chief Executive Elizabeth Spaulding tried to convince analysts during a conference call that the company’s longer-term strategy remains in tact.
    In the latest three-month period, Spaulding said that Stitch Fix struggled to onboard new customers, who pay for personalized boxes of clothing and other accessories delivered to their homes, called Fixes. But perhaps more worrisome for analysts and investors was the fact that the company’s recent rollout of a direct-buy option, called Freestyle, hasn’t converted as many people into Stitch Fix customers as the company had anticipated.
    “We’re still learning how best to onboard Freestyle first clients and recognize we have work to do on the Freestyle experience,” Spaulding said on the call.
    It hasn’t even been a year since Spaulding took over the reigns as CEO from Stitch Fix founder Katrina Lake last August. But she’s since been spearheading the company’s new initiatives, including the Freestyle rollout, to win new customers.
    Analysts are beginning to question Spaulding and her team’s execution of those initiatives.

    BMO Capital Markets analyst Simeon Siegel noted that Stitch Fix’s investments in Freestyle are significantly different than the company’s initial mission and format of selling curated boxes of clothing on a subscription basis, which when it launched was “new and different.”
    “At the end of the day, the push into Freestyle is an attempt to do everyday retail better,” said Siegel. “Whether or not that succeeds will hinge on the company’s execution. … At the heart of it, Freestyle’s success will depend on it being a better version of how people already shop.”
    Truist Securities on Tuesday evening downgraded Stitch Fix’s stock to hold from buy. Analyst Youssef Squali wrote in a note to clients that management’s execution, so far, appears to be challenged. Stitch Fix is now offering little visibility into how quickly the negative trends will reverse, he said. Truist cut its price target to $12 from $40.
    Telsey Advisory Group slashed its price target, too, to $14 from $25. The firm downgraded its rating to market perform from outperform.
    “While we expected [Freestyle] to expand the company’s addressable market and drive incremental revenue, it has proven difficult to roll out without adding friction to the onboarding of new Fix customers,” said Dana Telsey, chief executive and chief research officer.
    For its fiscal year, which ends July 30, Stitch Fix said Tuesday that it sees revenue flat to slightly down year over year, assuming that the number of active clients is flat through the end of the 12-month period. Analysts had expected revenue to be up 8.1% for the year, according to Refinitiv estimates.
    Stitch Fix shares had closed Tuesday at $11.01, giving the company a market cap of about $1.2 billion.
    —CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed to this reporting.
    This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Yale professor behind corporate 'naughty-or-nice list' lauds U.S. brands' decision to pause Russia business

    The Yale professor who put together a list of major western companies still operating in Russia applauded multiple major American brands’ decisions Tuesday to pause business in that country over its government’s war on Ukraine.
    “I am feeling pretty good about this!” Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, the professor, told CNBC in an email after hearing the news that McDonald’s, Starbucks and Coca-Cola were halting operations in Russia.
    PepsiCo followed suit later in the day.

    Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Yale School of Management
    Scott Mlyn | CNBC

    The Yale professor who put together a list of major western companies still operating in Russia applauded multiple major American brands’ decisions Tuesday to pause business in that country over its government’s war on Ukraine.
    “I am feeling pretty good about this!” Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, the professor, told CNBC in an email after hearing the news that McDonald’s, Starbucks and Coca-Cola were halting operations in Russia.

    PepsiCo soon followed suit with its own announcement that it is suspending Russian sales of Pepsi-Cola, 7UP and Mirinda brand sodas, while continuing to sell some essential products.
    Earlier Tuesday, The Washington Post had named the first three companies, in order of their subsequent announcements, in a headline for a story about the spreadsheet maintained by Sonnenfeld and his research team at the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute.
    The newspaper called the spreadsheet a “naughty-or-nice list of sorts.” It currently lists 290 companies that have said they will exit Russia, or suspend or curtail business there. It also lists companies that have continued operations in Russia.
    Sonnenfeld said in an interview that in recent days he was in touch with executives at some of the four companies who announced their moves Tuesday in the face of outrage over Russia’s attack on Ukraine.
    “I admire all of these companies enormously,” Sonnenfeld said, referring to their decisions.

    “Our list made a big difference in that the CEOs wanted to do the right thing,” he said. “They kept telling me they were looking for the affirmation of others,” and that their boards of directors were keeping an eye on actions by other big companies, Sonnenfeld said.
    “They were afraid of the ‘tall poppy syndrome,’ as the Australians call it, and they didn’t want to suffer reprisals,” Sonnenfeld said.
    Spokespeople for Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Starbucks and PepsiCo had no immediate comment on Sonnenfeld’s remarks.
    McDonald’s and Starbucks replied by pointing to statements by their respective CEOs on their decisions Tuesday.
    McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski said that while the restaurant chain has operated for more than three decades in Russia, and become an “essential part of the 850 communities in which we operate … At the same time, our values mean we cannot ignore the needless human suffering unfolding in Ukraine.”
    Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson said condemned Russia’s “horrific” attack on Ukraine. “Through this dynamic situation, we will continue to make decisions that are true to our mission and values and communicate with transparency,” he said.
    Sonnenfeld, in his interview, said that as one company after another in recent days said they were leaving Russia or suspending business, “it had a snowball effect.”

    “These are some of the strongest representing foundational American values,” he said of the four companies which announced their suspensions of business Tuesday.
    “These brands have heritages going back to perestroika in 1990 as the Soviet Union was opening to the West, and they were greeted with enthusiasm by all sides,” he said.
    “This is why these companies, given that heritage, were confused on what to do,” in light of the Ukraine invasion, Sonnenfeld said.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    “They were lost in a time warp, because they were looking for a win-win solution in a world where they’re no longer any middle ground,” he said.
    Sonnenfeld said that in his discussions with three of the companies, the executives were trying to navigate a legal and operational resolution to the problem of having business in Russia while the nation faces worldwide condemnation and harsh economic sanctions from major Western governments.
    “None of them were troubled by financial considerations,” he said. “They were trying to find the right thing in a very complex geopolitical and cultural situation with loyalty and compassion for large local workforces.”
    Sonnenfeld said he compiled his spreadsheet as a moral argument for punishing Russia.
    “The whole point of the legal sanctions [by governments] coupled with voluntary employer economic embargoes is to stall out the Russian economy,” he said.
    The professor cited the success of widespread corporate boycotts of South Africa, in concert with global government action, in the 1980s and 1990s for helping push that country to dissolve its apartheid system, in which the white minority population had institutionalized legal, economic and legal power over the Black majority.
    Sonnenfeld predicted that the actions by Western companies “absolutely will have an effect” on Russia.
    He argued that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s power over the country is “anchored on two things”: a willingness to use violence as coercion, and “the illusion that he has totalitarian control over all sectors.”
    But the loss of major Western business in the country has shattered that illusion, the professor said.
    “The ruble has already fallen almost 80%. Inflation has soared to almost 30%. So that’s 10 days of economic history unparalleled in the world,” Sonnenfeld said.
    Sonnenfeld noted that the fleeing of big companies from Russia business, including by oil giants like Exxon, Shell and BP, means that “several hundreds of billions of dollars written off” in physical property and other assets in Russia, “separate from hundreds of billions of lost revenue.”
    “It’s a big deal,” he said.
    “This was extraordinary moral courage. It exceeds even what happened in South Africa,” he said.
    He noted, however, there are about three dozen Western companies on his list that are “stubbornly staying” in Russia. For now, at least.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    China watches warily as Ukraine makes U.S., EU and Japan strengthen their alliance

    For China, the speed and severity with which the U.S. and its allies sanctioned Russia is a warning sign that could guide future economic and foreign policy.
    “This is a very multilateral moment,” said Reva Goujon, senior manager for the China corporate advisory team at Rhodium Group.
    Beijing has refused to call Russia’s attack on Ukraine an invasion. China has focused on promoting negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, and it opposes the economic measures that have been taken against Russia.

    Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin attend a meeting during the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) summit in Brasilia on November 14, 2019.
    Pavel Golovkin | Afp | Getty Images

    BEIJING — Since taking office last year, President Joe Biden has pursued a strategy of restoring relationships with allies to put pressure on Beijing.
    The Russian invasion of Ukraine nearly two weeks ago showed what those allies can do.

    For China, the speed and severity with which the U.S. and its allies sanctioned Russia is a warning sign that could guide future economic and foreign policy.
    Chinese officials have increased efforts to buttress their country’s self-reliance since President Donald Trump sanctioned telecommunications giant Huawei and slapped tariffs on billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods.
    But Trump did all that singlehandedly — while simultaneously damaging ties with Europe and provoking uncertainty among U.S. allies in Asia.
    The response to Ukraine has been anything but a go-it-alone move by the United States.
    “Given the success that the U.S. has had in coordinating the financial sanctions and export controls not just with Europe but also with Japan, a key player in tech value chains — this is extremely alarming for China,” said Reva Goujon, senior manager for the China corporate advisory team at Rhodium Group.

    “This is a very multilateral moment,” Goujon said. “At a high level, you would think China would benefit from [the U.S.] having a big distraction in Europe, but actually [this] only accentuates those policy debates over critical exposure and vulnerabilities to Chinese supply chains.”
    From Germany to Japan, many countries have joined the U.S. in freezing the assets of Russian oligarchs, restricting access of Russia’s biggest banks to the global financial system, and cutting off Russia from critical technology.

    China condemns ‘unilateral’ sanctions

    China’s Foreign Ministry has repeatedly said it “opposes all illegal unilateral sanctions.” It has not elaborated on how the sanctions against Russia, which have been imposed by many countries, could be considered unilateral.
    When asked about an “alliance of Western nations” pushing Russia out of the SWIFT banking network, Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin said last week that “China does not agree with resolving issues with sanctions, still less unilateral sanctions that lack the basis of international law,” according to an English-language press conference transcript.
    Later in the week, spokesperson Wang reiterated that position in response to a question about whether Western sanctions on trade with Russia would affect China.
    Sanctions “only create serious difficulties to the economy and livelihood of relevant countries and further intensify division and confrontation,” he said.

    China’s Europe balance

    Escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China in the last few years had already accelerated Beijing’s efforts to firm up ties with Europe. The Ukraine war threatens all that.
    China’s “balancing act” of trying to quietly support Russia while keeping up relations with Europe is “going to be more and more difficult. That has consequences for trade links, primarily with the EU,” said Nick Marro, global trade leader at The Economist Intelligence Unit.

    I think the West is very caught up in the moment, … this idea that the U.S.-led liberal order is back, Germany has woken up, even Switzerland.

    Reva Goujon
    Rhodium Group

    Marro noted that reputational risks rise for China “the more China tries to fudge its stance on Russia and focus its criticism on NATO and the U.S.”
    “China was hoping to use the EU as a way to offset the pressure it was facing from the U.S.,” Marro said. “Right now, Europe sees Russia as an existential threat.”
    “Right now the impact for China [from the sanctions] really is secondary,” Marro said. “This conflict raises bigger questions around industrial policy and China’s diplomatic relations with the West.”

    China’s big economy

    China is dealing with a host of its own economic challenges, from sluggish consumer demand to a slowdown in its massive property sector. Politically, Beijing is concerned with stability this year as leaders are set to meet in the fall to give Xi an unprecedented third term.
    That all said, China is more entrenched in the global economy than Russia is and doesn’t have the same vulnerabilities — to sanctions, for example — that Russia has.
    Europe relies on Russian oil and natural gas, but Russia is otherwise small in global terms, with an economy the size of the U.S. state of Texas.

    Read more about China from CNBC Pro

    Because Western trade with China is far greater than it is with Russia, a full trade war with China “would be quite costly [for the West] and in nobody’s interest,” said Alexander-Nikolai Sandkamp, a fellow at the German-based Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    “The West would welcome it if China took a stand against Russia and joined more actively the Western protests,” he said. “Now that China is remaining relatively neutral, that’s probably the best that we can expect.”
    The Ukraine war and sanctions will likely lower global gross domestic product by only 0.2% this year, with a bigger impact in Europe, according to Tommy Wu, a lead economist at Oxford Economics.

    China, Russia and SWIFT

    Global finance provides a clear example of the limits on China’s ability to support Russia. Just days after the war began, the U.S. and EU pledged to remove some Russian banks from SWIFT, the standard interbank messaging system for financial institutions.
    “If all Russian institutions are banned from joining the SWIFT network, then I think the level of political pressure is very different from what it is now,” said ­­Zhu Ning, professor of finance and deputy dean at the Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance.
    “Then any attempt to avoid punishment” would be considered “complicit,” he said. “Quite tricky for Chinese financial institutions.”
    The Beijing-based Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank announced last week it was suspending activities related to Russia and Belarus.

    Short-lasting Western unity?

    On the other hand, there’s also the matter of general political dysfunction in the United States, where the Democrat and Republican parties are increasingly unable to work together to achieve even widely supported domestic goals.
    Rhodium Group’s Goujon pointed out that the U.S. presidential election in 2024 poses a risk to how long the unity lasts among U.S. allies.
    “I think the West is very caught up in the moment, … this idea that the U.S.-led liberal order is back, Germany has woken up, even Switzerland,” she said.
    “But there are other countries like Mexico, like India, that we see embrace the Chinese narrative of the multipolar order more readily,” she said, “and that’s where I think China is waiting for the heat of the war to die.”

    Regardless, the Biden administration is trying hard to unify the world’s democracies — and since the Ukraine war started, more of them seem to be listening.
    Last week, the leaders of the Quad — Australia, India, Japan and the U.S. — held a call about the conflict and to reaffirm their commitment to work together as a group. However, India has yet to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
    Strengthening the Quad is part of Biden’s strategy “to restore American leadership in the Indo-Pacific,” as announced in a fact sheet published in February. A U.S. official told reporters in a briefing last month there was no intention to engage Beijing on the economic aspects of building up the Indo-Pacific.  
    When asked Monday about Biden’s Indo-Pacific strategy, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang claimed the U.S. goal is to create an Indo-Pacific version of NATO. “China wants all parties to join us in doing the right thing,” he said, via an official translator. “Together we will reject attempts to create small, divisive circles within the Pacific.”
    Wang said during the annual press briefing that China opposes bloc politics. He portrayed Beijing’s ties with Europe, India, Southeast Asia, Latin America, Africa and other countries and regions as separate from China’s other foreign relations.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Nickel's price surge could threaten automakers' ambitious electric-vehicle plans

    Russia is a key supplier of nickel. Prices have surged since its invasion of Ukraine.
    Nickel is a critical ingredient in the lithium-ion batteries used in most electric vehicles.
    Automakers and investors will have to rethink EV plans if nickel supplies are constrained.

    The price of nickel is surging as investors take stock of the new global reality: Russia, a key supplier of the metal, is now facing extensive sanctions following its invasion of Ukraine.
    In an unusual step, the London Metal Exchange suspended nickel trading on Tuesday morning after three-month contract prices more than doubled to over $100,000 per ton.

    Nickel is a critical ingredient in the lithium-ion battery cells used in most electric vehicles sold in — and planned for — the U.S. market. Its abrupt price surge has analysts and investors raising hard questions about automakers’ ambitious electric-vehicle programs.
    Morgan Stanley auto analyst Adam Jonas has been among the loudest voices raising concerns. In a note published Monday, he said: “As of this writing, nickel is up 67.2% just today, representing around a $1,000 increase in the input cost of an average EV in the U.S.”
    Jonas wrote that investors should reduce their expectations for automakers’ earnings, and for electric-vehicle sales penetration over the next few years, as nickel’s abrupt price surge could undermine the ambitious EV plans put forth by global automakers including General Motors and Ford Motor.

    Why nickel is important to EV batteries

    Lithium-ion battery cells have three layers:

    a cathode that contains lithium mixed with nickel and other minerals such as cobalt, manganese or aluminum
    an anode, made of carbon graphite and sometimes silicon
    a separator made of a porous polymer

    There’s also a liquid electrolyte, generally made from lithium salt that is dissolved in a solvent.

    When the battery cell is charged, lithium ions are driven from the cathode to the anode. As the cell is discharged, the ions move back to the cathode, releasing energy.
    In recent years, automakers have discovered that adding more nickel to the cathode can boost a battery’s energy density, which translates into more range per pound of batteries.
    Older lithium-ion batteries used cathodes that were about one-third nickel. But in recent years, automakers have increased the percentage of nickel in cathodes to boost the batteries’ energy density and increase vehicle range. Most are now using cathodes that contain at least 60% nickel.
    Some use even more, in part to reduce or eliminate cobalt, and in part to increase density for premium applications: The cathodes in cells that Korean battery giant LG Chem supplies to Tesla are 90% nickel, for instance.

    Analysts were raising concerns before the war

    High-nickel batteries offer significant advantages for electric vehicles. But even before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, nickel wasn’t cheap, and experts were raising concerns about a likely shortage as global automakers ramped up production of EVs.
    Analysts at Rystad Energy warned last fall that global demand for the high-grade nickel required for EV batteries is likely to outstrip supply by 2024, a message that has since been echoed by other commodity analysts, including Jonas’s counterparts at Morgan Stanley.
    Given the relatively high cost of nickel, and the concerns about supply that were being voiced before Russia invaded Ukraine, automakers have signaled that lithium-ion batteries with high-nickel cathodes are likely to be limited to premium applications. In those, the energy density is either required (as with heavy trucks) or a key selling point (as with luxury sedans).

    How this price hike could play out

    Assuming that nickel’s price increase is sustained, the quick and obvious takeaway is that electric-vehicle costs will go up — and more so for higher-end EVs.
    Automakers who haven’t locked in a supply of nickel at pre-invasion prices will have a hard choice. They can choose to absorb the cost increase, reducing their profit margins, or they can try to pass it on to consumers. Most will likely do some of both.
    Not all EVs will be affected. There is an alternative type of battery that’s already in use for lower-cost EVs, although it comes with tradeoffs. Lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, batteries use iron phosphate in their cathodes, no nickel or cobalt required.
    LFP cells cost less than lithium-ion cells, but they also have lower energy density, which means that LFP battery packs are heavier per mile of range than their lithium-ion counterparts. That weight has made LFP batteries less than ideal for higher-end vehicles, as added weight limits performance and can hinder a vehicle’s handling. That’s less of a concern with price-constrained mass-market models. Chinese automakers, under government pressure to encourage EV adoption, have used LFP batteries in their lower-cost electric vehicles for several years.
    LFP technology received a visibility boost in the U.S. when Tesla began using LFP batteries in its entry-level “standard range” models last fall. At the time, the move to LFP was seen as a way for Tesla to lower the cost of producing those models — or put another way, to increase the profitability of those entry-level vehicles without increasing prices.
    Now, with nickel prices skyrocketing, we may — once again — see major global automakers following Tesla’s lead.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    S&P 500 futures are flat as investors continue to assess rising commodities prices and the ongoing war in Ukraine

    S&P 500 futures were flat Tuesday evening as investors continued to assess a surge in commodity prices and high inflation while the war in Ukraine continues.
    Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 47 points, or 0.1%. S&P 500 futures were flat and Nasdaq 100 futures lost 0.1%.

    The major averages all closed lower after a day of choppy trading. The Dow gave up a 585-point gain to end the day lower by 184 points, or 0.5%, falling deeper into its correction. The S&P 500 slid 0.7%, also moving into correction territory. The Nasdaq Composite lost 0.2%, after entering bear market territory Monday.
    The market volatility was driven by uncertainty among investors as they continued to assess surging prices in commodities like oil, gasoline, natural gas and precious metals. That fueled concerns about a slowdown in global growth amid surging inflation.
    It remains to be seen if the Federal Reserve will manage a soft economic landing, but the U.S. should be able to avoid a recession, according to Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Baird.
    “The strength of the U.S. labor market, consumer and aggregate corporate sector should act as the weight to keep us out of recession near-term,” he told CNBC. “Overall, volatility is likely to persist, [there’s a] wide range of outcomes possible in Ukraine, but the fundamentals of the U.S. economy still look decent, especially if the Fed can navigate raising rates without breaking demand.”

    Stock picks and investing trends from CNBC Pro:

    Energy stocks were a bright spot in the market as oil prices continued to climb, jumping to their highs of the session as President Joe Biden announced a ban on Russian fossil imports, including oil, in response to the country’s invasion of Ukraine. That was after oil hit a 13-year high of $130 to start the week.

    Other commodity prices resumed their push higher, including nickel, which touched a new record above $100,000 a metric ton.
    Treasury yields also spiked, with the benchmark 10-year note adding close to 10 basis points to 1.85%, as inflation fears led investors to shed bonds.
    Earnings continue Wednesday with Campbell Soup, Crowdstrike and Marqeta all set to report.
    On the economic data front, investors are looking forward to homebuying data from the Mortgage Bankers Association as well as the job openings and labor turnover survey, or JOLTS.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Iconic U.S. brands Coca-Cola, Pepsi, McDonald's and Starbucks suspend business in Russia

    PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and Starbucks each said Tuesday they are suspending business in Russia after that country’s invasion of Ukraine.
    It’s a symbolic move by the iconic U.S. brands, some of which have been operating in the country since it was part of the Soviet Union.
    In recent days, all four companies have drawn criticism for continuing to operate in Russia while other U.S. companies announced business suspensions.

    PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s and Starbucks each said Tuesday they are suspending business in Russia after that country’s invasion of Ukraine, a symbolic move by four iconic U.S. brands.
    Pepsi has sold it products in Russia for more than six decades, even when the company had to trade its soda concentrate for Stolichnaya vodka and warships. McDonald’s opened its first location beyond the Iron Curtain in Moscow, just months before the Soviet Union collapsed.

    In recent days, Pepsi, Coke, McDonald’s and Starbucks have drawn criticism for continuing to operate in Russia while other U.S. companies announced suspensions and paused sales.
    Yale Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld compiled and made public a list of U.S. companies that have withdrawn from Russia following President Vladimir Putin’s invasion — and those that hadn’t. Until Tuesday afternoon, Coke was among the most recognizable names on the spreadsheet.
    “Our hearts are with the people who are enduring unconscionable effects from these tragic events in Ukraine,” Coke said in a brief statement Tuesday afternoon. “We will continue to monitor and assess the situation as circumstances evolve.”
    Russia represents one of the few regions worldwide where Coke’s rival PepsiCo has a larger presence. In a regulatory filing, Coke said its business in Ukraine and Russia contributed about 1% to 2% of its consolidated net operating revenue and operating income in 2021.
    Pepsi, on the other hand, generates roughly 4% of its annual revenue in Russia, though it is not halting all business in the country. The company said it will keep selling some essential products, like baby formula, milk and baby food.

    It said it will suspend Russian sales of its Pepsi-Cola, 7UP and Mirinda brands, along with capital investments and all advertising and promotional activities.
    “As a food and beverage company, now more than ever we must stay true to the humanitarian aspect of our business,” Pepsi CEO Ramon Laguarta wrote in a memo to employees viewed by CNBC.
    The Wall Street Journal reported earlier on Tuesday that Pepsi was weighing different options for its Russian business, including writing off its value. Economic sanctions have greatly complicated the process of offloading Russian assets.

    Since the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014, many U.S. companies have looked to reduce their exposure in both Russia and Ukraine. Some restaurant chains, like McDonald’s, have sold off some of their company-owned locations to local franchisees.
    McDonald’s announced Tuesday all 850 of its Russian restaurants would temporarily close. Until then, the fast food chain had stayed silent on the war, drawing stronger criticism than the handful of restaurant companies that condemned the invasion but kept their locations open.
    About 84% of McDonald’s Russian locations are owned by the company, while the rest are operated by franchisees. Owning more of its restaurants means greater revenue for the company, but greater risk in times of turmoil or economic downturn.
    Starbucks went a step further than McDonald’s, saying it would suspend all Russian business activity, including shipment of its products. Starbucks CEO Kevin Johnson condemned the attacks in a letter on Friday.
    Of the two restaurant companies, McDonald’s has a larger presence in the country and receives a higher percentage of its global revenue from those sales.

    Stock picks and investing trends from CNBC Pro:

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    GM electric vehicles to power homes in a new California pilot program

    General Motors on Tuesday announced a pilot program in California that would make its electric vehicles capable of powering a home in the event of a power outage or grid failure.
    The pilot program is through a partnership with Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
    The move matches similar capabilities by other automakers, including Ford Motor.

    General Motors on Tuesday announced a pilot program with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. in California that would make its electric vehicles capable of powering a home in the event of a power outage or grid failure.
    “This is really significant because it’s another benefit of owning an electric vehicle,” GM CEO Mary Barra said Tuesday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

    The move matches similar capabilities by other automakers, including Ford Motor with its upcoming electric F-150 Lightning pickup that’s due out this spring. Ford has partnered with solar company Sunrun for charging and energy accessories to allow such capabilities. EV start-up Lucid Group also has announced similar features for its $169,000 Air sedan.
    Select PG&E utility customers will take part in the pilot this summer, Barra said. The companies are working to scale the pilot to open it up for larger customer trials by the end of 2022, according to a press release.

    Read more about electric vehicles from CNBC Pro

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More