More stories

  • in

    Trump wants a certain kind of immigrant: the uber-rich

    IN HIS LOVE of lucre Donald Trump can be crass. In their pursuit of efficiency, free-marketeers can be, too. Consider the sale of citizenship. Most people dislike the idea of treating national belonging as a commodity. Yet a dozen or so countries hawk passports and more than 60, including America, offer residency in exchange for an investment or donation. The country’s “golden visa” scheme is cumbersome, underpriced and inefficient. On this point, the president and the market agree. More

  • in

    This fund is designed to help investors withstand wild market swings

    Katie Stockton thinks she has a viable option for investors trying to withstand wild market swings.
    She manages the Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF (TACK), which is designed to be nimble in times of market stress. It’s not tied to an index.

    “What we try to do is help investors leverage the upside through sector rotation, but also minimize drawdowns,” the Fairlead Strategies founder told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “That’s obviously a big advantage longer term when you can just go into a less deep hole to climb out of.”
    According to Stockton, her ETF is particularly nimble in this environment because it uses multiple strategies — not just one. Since President Donald Trump announced his “reciprocal” tariffs on April 2, the ETF has fallen just over 4%, while the S&P 500 has lost 6.9%.
    Stockton’s ETF rotates monthly between all 11 S&P 500 sectors.
    “We don’t own technology anymore,” Stockton said. “Some of the sectors that we like to invest in have fallen out of favor.”
    As of April 16, the fund’s top sector holdings included consumer staples, utilities and real estate, according to Fairlead Strategies. 

    As of Thursday’s close, the Fairlead Tactical Sector ETF is down 4% so far this year.
    Meanwhile, ETFs that are centered around specific sectors or strategies are largely under pressure. For example, the Invesco Top QQQ Trust (QBIG), which tracks the top 45% of companies in the Nasdaq-100 index, is down 22% in 2025.
    The GraniteShares YieldBoost TSLA ETF (TSYY) is off 48% since the beginning of the year.
    BTIG’s Troy Donohue, the firm’s head of Americas portfolio trading, thinks Stockton’s ETF employs a sound strategy – particularly during the recent “dramatic pullback.”
    “TACK is a great example of how you can be nimble during these market times,” Donohue said. “It’s great to see it in an ETF product that has performed really well during this recent drawdown.”

    Disclaimer More

  • in

    Capital One and Discover merger approved by Federal Reserve

    Capital One Financial’s application to acquire Discover Financial Services has officially been approved by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
    Capital One announced plans to acquire Discover in an all-stock transaction valued at $35.3 billion in February 2024.
    It will also indirectly acquire Discover Bank through the transaction.

    Sign at the entrance to a Capital One bank branch in Manhattan.
    Erik Mcgregor | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Capital One Financial’s application to acquire Discover Financial Services in a $35.3 billion all-stock deal has officially been approved by the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the regulators announced on Friday.
    “The Board evaluated the application under the statutory factors it is required to consider, including the financial and managerial resources of the companies, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served by the combined organization, and the competitive and financial stability impacts of the proposal,” the Fed said in a release.

    Capital One first announced it had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Discover in February 2024. It will also indirectly acquire Discover Bank through the transaction, which was approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on Friday.
    Under the agreement, Discover shareholders will receive 1.0192 Capital One shares for each Discover share or about a 26% premium from Discover’s closing price of $110.49 at the time, Capital One said in a release.
    Capital One and Discover are among the largest credit card issuers in the U.S., and the merger will expand Capital One’s deposit base and its credit card offerings. 
    As a condition of the merger, Capital One said it will comply with the Fed’s action against Discover, according to the release. The Fed fined Discover $100 million for overcharging certain interchange fees from 2007 through 2023, and the company is repaying those fees to affected customers.
    The OCC said it approved Capital One’s application on the condition that it would take “corrective actions” to remediate harm and address the “root causes” of outstanding enforcement actions against Discover.

    After the deal closes, Capital One shareholders will hold 60% of the combined company, while Discover shareholders own 40%, according to the February 2024 release.
    In a joint statement, Capital One and Discover said they expect to close the deal on May 18.
    WATCH: Jamie Dimon on Capital One’s $35.3 billion Discover acquisition: ‘Let them compete’ More

  • in

    Canadian small businesses are taking Trump’s tariffs personally

    For some Canadians, President Donald Trump’s tariffs may mean an erosion of trust with trade partners.
    Canadian national pride has sparked resistance and inspired action from small businesses.
    Canadian entrepreneurs are deciding which side of the border will absorb the costs of new tariffs.

    Close-up of ‘Shop Canadian’ poster displayed in a local storefront in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, on April 4, 2025.
    Artur Widak | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    Just across the U.S.-Canada border, some small businesses are taking tariffs personally.
    President Donald Trump has said his wide-sweeping tariffs, even on some of the country’s closest trade partners, will rebalance international trade and bring manufacturing back stateside. But for the U.S.’s northern neighbors, tariffs may mean an erosion of trust.

    The country’s trade relationship with Canada has historically been integral to both national economies. In 2024, the trade of goods between both nations totaled $762.1 billion. According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, Canada exported over three-quarters of its goods to the U.S. last year, and U.S. imports accounted for almost half of all goods it brought in.
    Starting in March, however, the Trump administration implemented a 10% tariff on Canadian energy and 25% tariffs on other imports from Canada and Mexico, a levy he’d promised on Inauguration Day. But he exempted many imports covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada agreement.
    Trump also put a 25% tariff on vehicles not assembled in the U.S. that took effect earlier this month, a move that affects both Mexico and Canada, two major auto production hubs. In addition, a 25% tariff on auto parts is set to take effect next month.
    Canada has responded with its own retaliatory tariffs, but national pride has sparked another kind of resistance.

    Balzac’s Coffee Roasters highlights Canadian patriotism on its cafe menus.
    Matthew Mikrut | CNBC

    Balzac’s Coffee Roasters, a chain of cafes across Ontario and Toronto, has responded to trade tensions with a renamed menu item: the Americano — a commonplace espresso drink — is now a maple leaf-marked “Canadiano.”

    Your Independent Grocers, a chain of independently owned supermarkets under the Canadian-traded Loblaw Companies, uses its own maple leaf badge to indicate products “prepared in Canada.” The grocer also indicates tariff-impacted items with a “T” logo in stores and online. 

    Aisles at Your Independent Grocer in Niagara-on-the-Lake in Canada.
    Cameron Costa | CNBC

    Corinne Pohlmann is the executive vice president of advocacy at the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, of CFIB, which represents over 100,000 small businesses across 12 of Canada’s 13 territories and provinces.
    About half of CFIB members are directly involved in either importing or exporting from the U.S., according to the organization’s December 2024 survey. That metric does not include reliance on suppliers and customers who are also trading with the U.S.
    More than a quarter of CFIB members surveyed in late March reported seeing stronger demand for Canadian-owned products. More than half of the surveyed businesses agreed that the U.S. is not a reliable trading partner. 
    The trade tensions have extended to some long-standing relationships between U.S. and Canadian small businesses, she said, as entrepreneurs decide which side of the border will absorb the costs of new tariffs. Pohlmann recalled some CFIB members asking for guidance on how to renegotiate contracts with partners to the south.
    Pohlmann said the tariffs are causing emotional distress, in addition to cost increases.
    “For a lot of Canadians, it felt like a betrayal,” Pohlmann said.
    The Liquor Control Board of Ontario halted its purchases of U.S. products starting on March 4. The LCBO retail store in Niagara-on-the-Lake displays signage that reads, “For the good of Ontario, for the good of Canada,” explaining the disappearance of U.S.-made products like California wines and Tito’s Vodka. 

    A worker removes bottles of American-made wine from a shelf at the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) Queen’s Quay store in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Tuesday, March 4, 2025.
    Christopher Katsarov Luna | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    It’s not always clear cut, though.
    A representative for LCBO press clarified via email to CNBC that any product made in Canada, like locally produced Coors Light beer, is OK to grace shelves, regardless of the company’s ownership.
    Molson Coors has production facilities in both Canada and the U.S.
    “While we are a global business, our beers and beverages are generally made in the markets in which they are sold,” said Molson Coors Senior Director of Communications Rachel Gellman Johnson.
    Tariffs are typically a tool of “hard power,” prompting geopolitical change by coercion. The U.S.’s long-standing relationships with trading partners like Canada, Mexico and Japan have bolstered the country’s influence on the global stage.
    Beyond the numbers, it’s U.S. influence, or so-called “soft power,” that may take a hit.
    Former Secretary of State Antony Blinken told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin this month that a hit to the country’s soft power is his biggest fear in today’s environment.
    “The idea that we would not only see China try to develop more soft power, but that we would cede our own…not good for the country, not good for our interests,” Blinken said.

    Even if President Trump lessens tariffs, Canadian businesses may be hesitant to rebuild trading relationships with U.S. partners. CFIB’s Pohlmann pointed to lost contracts and eroded trust.
    “While we’d welcome a permanent reprieve from tariffs, the trading relationship between Canada and the United States has been fractured and may never be the same again,” Pohlmann said. More

  • in

    Where ‘Made in China 2025’ missed the mark

    China missed several key targets from its 10-year plan to become self-sufficient in technology, and fostered unhealthy industrial competition which increased global trade tensions, the European Chamber of Commerce in China said in a report this week.
    Out of ten strategic sectors identified in the report, China only attained clear technological leadership in shipbuilding, high-speed rail and electric cars.
    Despite not making all “Made in China 2025” targets, the country has advanced so rapidly, it’s now a direct competitor with European and U.S. manufacturing in many aspects, the chamber said.

    Smart robotic arms work on the production line at the production workshop of Changqing Auto Parts Co., LTD., located in Anqing Economic Development Zone, Anhui Province, China, on March 13, 2025. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
    Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    BEIJING — China missed several key targets from its 10-year plan to become self-sufficient in technology, while fostering unhealthy industrial competition which worsened global trade tensions, the European Chamber of Commerce in China said in a report this week.
    When Beijing released its “Made in China 2025” plan in 2015, it was met with significant international criticism for promoting Chinese business at the expense of their foreign counterparts. The country subsequently downplayed the initiative, but has doubled-down on domestic tech development given U.S. restrictions in the last several years.

    Since releasing the plan, China has exceeded its targets on achieving domestic dominance in autos, but the country has not yet reached its targets in aerospace, high-end robots and the growth rate of manufacturing value-added, the business chamber said, citing its research and discussions with members. Out of ten strategic sectors identified in the report, China only attained technological dominance in shipbuilding, high-speed rail and electric cars.
    China’s targets are generally seen as a direction rather than an actual figure to be achieved by a specific date. The Made In China 2025 plan outlines the first ten years of what the country called a ‘multi-decade strategy’ to become a global manufacturing powerhouse.
    The chamber pointed out that China’s self-developed airplane, the C919, still relies heavily on U.S. and European parts and though industrial automation levels have “increased substantially,” it is primarily due to foreign technology. In addition, the growth rate of manufacturing value add reached 6.1% in 2024, falling from the 7% rate in 2015 and just over halfway toward reaching the target of 11%.
    “Everyone should consider themselves lucky that China missed its manufacturing growth target,” Jens Eskelund, president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, told reporters Tuesday, since the reverse would have exacerbated pressure on global competitors. “They didn’t fulfill their own target, but I actually think they did astoundingly well.”

    Even at that slower pace, China has transformed itself over the last decade to drive 29% of global manufacturing value add — almost the same as the U.S. and Europe combined, Eskelund said. “Before 2015, in many, many categories China was not a direct competitor of Europe and the United States.”

    The U.S. in recent years has sought to restrict China’s access to high-end tech, and encourage advanced manufacturing companies to build factories in America.
    Earlier this week, the U.S. issued exporting licensing requirements for U.S.-based chipmaker Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308 artificial intelligence chips, as well as their equivalents, to China. Prior to that, Nvidia said that it would take a quarterly charge of about $5.5 billion as a result of the new exporting licensing requirements. The chipmaker’s CEO Jensen Huang met with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Beijing on Thursday, according to Chinese state media.
    The U.S. restrictions have “pushed us to make things that previously we would not have thought we had to buy,” said Lionel M. Ni, founding president of the Guangzhou campus of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. That’s according to a CNBC translation of his Mandarin-language remarks to reporters on Wednesday.
    Ni said the products requiring home-grown development efforts included chips and equipment, and if substitutes for restricted items weren’t immediately available, the university would buy the second-best version available.
    In addition to thematic plans, China issues national development priorities every five years. The current 14th five-year plan emphasizes support for the digital economy and wraps up in December. The subsequent 15th five-year plan is scheduled to be released next year.

    China catching up

    It remains unclear to what extent China can become completely self-sufficient in key technological systems in the near term. But local companies have made rapid strides.
    Chinese telecommunications giant Huawei released a smartphone in late 2023 that reportedly contained an advanced chip capable of 5G speeds. The company has been on a U.S. blacklist since 2019 and released its own operating system last year that is reportedly completely separate from Google’s Android.
    “Western chip export controls have had some success in that they briefly set back China’s developmental efforts in semiconductors, albeit at some cost to the United States and allied firms,” analysts at the Washington, D.C.,-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, said in a report this week. However, they noted that China has only doubled down, “potentially destabilizing the U.S. semiconductor ecosystem.”
    For example, the thinktank pointed out, Huawei’s current generation smartphone, the Pura 70 series, incorporates 33 China-sourced components and only 5 sourced from outside of China.
    Huawei reported a 22% surge in revenue in 2024 — the fastest growth since 2016 — buoyed by a recovery in its consumer products business. The company spent 20.8% of its revenue on research and development last year, well above its annual goal of more than 10%.
    Overall, China manufacturers reached the nationwide 1.68% target for spending on research and development as a percentage of operating revenue, the EU Chamber report said.
    “‘Europe needs to take a hard look at itself,” Eskelund said, referring to Huawei’s high R&D spend. “Are European companies doing what is needed to remain at the cutting edge of technology?”
    Dutch semiconductor equipment firm ASML spent 15.2% of its net sales in 2024 on R&D, while Nvidia’s ratio was 14.2%.

    Overcapacity and security concerns

    However, high spending doesn’t necessarily mean efficiency.
    The electric car race in particular has prompted a price war, with most automakers running losses in their attempt to undercut competitors. The phenomenon is often called “neijuan” or “involution” in China.
    “We also need to realize [China’s] success has not come without problems,” Eskelund said. “We are seeing across a great many industries it has not translated into healthy business.”
    He added that the attempt to fulfill “Made in China 2025” targets contributed to involution, and pointed out that China’s efforts to move up the manufacturing value chain from Christmas ornaments to high-end equipment have also increased global worries about security risks.

    Weekly analysis and insights from Asia’s largest economy in your inboxSubscribe now

    In an annual government work report delivered in March, Chinese Premier Li Qiang called for efforts to halt involution, echoing a directive from a high-level Politburo meeting in July last year. The Politburo is the second-highest circle of power in the ruling Chinese Communist Party.
    Such fierce competition compounds the impact of already slowing economic growth. Out of 2,825 mainland China-listed companies, 20% reported a loss for the first time in 2024, according to a CNBC analysis of Wind Information data as of Thursday. Including companies that reported yet another year of losses, the share of companies that lost money last year rose to nearly 48%, the analysis showed.
    China in March emphasized that boosting consumption is its priority for the year, after previously focusing on manufacturing. Retail sales growth have lagged behind industrial production on a year-to-date basis since the beginning of 2024, according to official data accessed via Wind Information.
    Policymakers are also looking for ways to ensure “a better match between manufacturing output and what the domestic market can absorb,” Eskelund said, adding that efforts to boost consumption don’t matter much if manufacturing output grows even faster.
    But when asked about policies that could address manufacturing overcapacity, he said, “We are also eagerly waiting in anticipation.” More

  • in

    Netflix maintained its 2025 guidance. That may not be the sign of confidence it seems

    Netflix executives said the business has remained stable amid recent economic turmoil.
    Still, the company declined to revise 2025 guidance upward, despite saying it is “tracking above the mid-point” of its stated range.
    Netflix cited its previous history of successfully weathering economic downturns.

    Greg Peters, Co-CEO of Netflix, speaks at a keynote on the future of entertainment at Mobile World Congress 2023.
    Joan Cros | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    Netflix executives messaged Thursday that all is well with the business in the face of economic turbulence. But its full-year outlook tells a slightly more nuanced story.
    Netflix posted a big beat on operating margin for the first quarter, reporting 31.7% compared with the average estimate of 28.5%, according to StreetAccount. And it guided well above analyst estimates for the second quarter — 33.3% against an average estimate of 30%.

    By its own phrasing, Netflix was “ahead” of its own guidance for the first quarter and is “tracking above the mid-point of our 2025 revenue guidance range.”
    Still, Netflix declined to alter any of its longer-term projections. That suggests Netflix isn’t quite as confident in its second half.
    “There’s been no material change to our overall business outlook since our last earnings report,” Netflix wrote in its quarterly note to shareholders.
    U.S. consumer sentiment is at its second-lowest level since 1952 as President Donald Trump’s new tariff policies roil markets.
    Co-CEO Greg Peters noted during the company’s earnings conference call that Netflix has, in the past, “been generally quite resilient” to economic slowdowns. Home entertainment provides a cheaper form of leisure than most other activities. A monthly Netflix subscription with ads costs $7.99.

    But the question remains how — or whether — an economic slowdown would pinch Americans’ wallets and force higher churn among streaming subscriptions.
    Netflix stopped reporting quarterly subscriber numbers this quarter, so the company will likely not detail if it sees a customer slowdown later this year beyond reporting its underlying revenue and profit.
    First-quarter revenue of $10.5 billion was roughly in line with analyst expectations, while second-quarter guidance of $11 billion is slightly above.
    “Retention, that’s stable and strong. We haven’t seen anything significant in plan mix or plan take rate,” said Peters. “Things generally look stable.” More

  • in

    Netflix posts major earnings beat as revenue grows 13% in first quarter

    Netflix posted a major earnings beat Thursday, as revenue grew 13% during the first quarter of 2025.
    The report marks the first time the streaming giant did not disclose quarterly subscriber data, as it shifts its strategy to focus on revenue and other financial metrics as performance indicators.
    Netflix reported revenue of $10.54 billion for the first quarter, higher than Wall Street’s estimates of $10.52 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.

    Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos attends Netflix’s FYSEE event for “Squid Game” at Raleigh Studios Hollywood in Los Angeles, June 12, 2022.
    Charley Gallay | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    Netflix posted a major earnings beat Thursday, as revenue grew 13% during the first quarter of 2025.
    The streamer attributed its better-than-expected revenue to higher-than-forecast subscription and advertising dollars.

    In late January, the company increased its pricing across the board, raising its standard plan to $17.99 a month, its ad-supported plan to $7.99, and its premium plan to $24.99.
    The report marks the first time the streaming giant did not disclose quarterly subscriber data, as it shifts its strategy to focus on revenue and other financial metrics as performance indicators.
    Netflix’s earnings also come as traditional media stocks have been slammed by a tumultuous market prompted by President Donald Trump’s trade policy.
    Netflix, however, said it continues to forecast full-year revenue of between $43.5 billion and $44.5 billion.
    “There’s been no material change to our overall business outlook,” the company said in a statement Thursday.

    As investors worry about the potential impact of tariffs on consumer spending and confidence, Netflix’s co-CEO Greg Peters said on the company’s earnings call, “Based on what we are seeing by actually operating the business right now, there’s nothing really significant to note.”
    “We also take some comfort that entertainment historically has been pretty resilient in tougher economic times. Netflix, specifically, also, has been generally quite resilient. We haven’t seen any major impacts during those tougher times, albeit over a much shorter history,” Peters said.
    Netflix shares gained about 2% in extended trading Thursday.
    Here’s how the company performed for the quarter ended March 31, compared with estimates compiled by LSEG:

    Earnings per share: $6.61 vs. $5.71 expected
    Revenue: $10.54 billion vs. $10.52 billion expected

    Net income for the period was $2.89 billion, or $6.61 per share, up from $2.33 billion, or $5.28 per share, during the same quarter a year earlier.
    Revenue in the first quarter jumped nearly 13% year over year, reaching $10.54 billion.
    Netflix has been leaning on advertising as it seeks to soften slowing subscriber growth. “A key focus in 2025 is enhancing our capabilities for advertisers,” it said.
    The company launched its in-house ad tech platform in early April in the U.S., with plans to extend into other markets in the coming months.
    “We believe our ad tech platform is foundational to our long term ads strategy,” the company said. “Over time, it will enable us to offer better measurement, enhanced targeting, innovative ad formats and expanded programmatic capabilities.” More

  • in

    American Express’ wealthy cardholders are mostly untouched by tariff jitters

    American Express’ affluent cardholders are showing few signs of curbing their spending, Chief Financial Officer Christophe Le Caillec told CNBC.
    Billed business on AmEx cards in the first quarter rose 6%, or 7% when adjusted for the impact of the leap year.
    The bump in spending has continued into April, the CFO said, despite sharp declines in stocks this month amid concerns about President Donald Trump’s tariff policies.

    American Express

    American Express’ affluent cardholders are showing few signs of curbing their spending, and younger customers drove growth in first-quarter transaction volumes, Chief Financial Officer Christophe Le Caillec told CNBC.
    Billed business on AmEx cards rose 6% in the period, or 7% when adjusted for the impact of the leap year, the company reported Thursday, which shows that the bump in spending late last year continued into 2025, according to Le Caillec.

    Those trends have continued into April, the CFO said, despite sharp declines in stocks this month amid concerns that President Donald Trump’s tariff policies will cause a recession.
    The dynamic, which helped AmEx top expectations for first-quarter profit, shows that the company’s wealthier customer base may help to insulate it from concerns about tariffs and stubborn inflation. On the other end of the credit spectrum, Synchrony Financial, which offers store cards for dozens of popular retailers, has warned of a spending slowdown.
    “There’s a lot of stability and strength, despite the news and the environment,” Le Caillec said.
    Growth at AmEx came from younger cardholders, with millennial and Gen Z members spending 14% more in the quarter. Gen X and Baby Boomer cardholders showed more caution, registering 5% and 1% increases, respectively.
    Le Caillec said it’s difficult to discern whether cardholders were pulling forward purchases because of the looming tariffs, creating an artificial boost to purchase volumes, as JPMorgan executives said last week. But some small businesses may be doing so to build inventory because of concerns about the duties increasing costs, he added.

    Airline slump

    One category in particular gave Le Caillec confidence that the spending trends may be durable.
    “Restaurant spend is up 8%,” the CFO said. “This is the ultimate discretionary expense, it’s not something you can bring forward, and so it’s really a good indicator of the strength of our cardmember base and the confidence they have.”
    If there was a weak area besides the spending slowdown from older Americans, it was in airline transactions, according to the company’s earnings presentation. The category grew just 3%, or 4% when adjusted for the leap year, after climbing 13% in the fourth quarter.
    But while airlines, retailers and other corporations have pulled their earnings guidance on tariff uncertainty, AmEx was holding firm.
    It maintained its guidance for revenue growth of 8% to 10% and earnings of $15 to $15.50 per share this year, Le Caillec said.
    In the company’s presentation, though, it added a new caveat to its guidance: “Subject to the Macroeconomic Environment.” More