More stories

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket: Southwest Airlines, Robinhood, SoFi Technologies and more

    Take a look at some of the biggest movers in the premarket:
    Southwest Airlines (LUV) – The airline canceled more than 1,800 flights over the weekend, citing bad weather, air traffic control issues and staff shortages. Southwest disputed speculation that its high level of cancellations compared to other airlines was due to employee protests of a Covid-19 vaccine mandate. Southwest fell 2.8% in premarket trading.

    Robinhood (HOOD) – The trading platform’s stock fell 2.1% in premarket action, following a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that detailed the risks of increased regulation of cryptocurrency trading as well as possible new rules surrounding payment for order flow.
    SoFi Technologies (SOFI) – The fintech company’s stock rallied 3.1% in premarket action after Morgan Stanley initiated coverage with an “overweight” rating, calling it a “powerful revenue growth story” as it gains market share in the consumer finance space.
    Apple (AAPL) – Apple asked a judge to delay changes to its App Store that would require it to allow developers to bypass Apple’s in-app payment system. The changes stemmed from the case involving “Fortnite” creator Epic Games and is scheduled to go into effect December 9, but Apple is asking that its appeal be allowed to play out first.
    Merck (MRK) – The drugmaker and partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics announced the submission of an Emergency Use Authorization application to the Food and Drug Administration for their oral Covid-19 treatment molnupiravir. That follows positive study results that were unveiled earlier this month.
    Starbucks (SBUX) – The coffee chain’s shares added 1% in the premarket after Deutsche Bank upgraded the stock to “buy” from “hold,” citing “incredible” U.S. momentum and the prospect of sustained unit growth in China.

    Aspen Technology (AZPN) – The industrial software maker announced a deal to merge with two of Emerson Electric’s (EMR) software businesses in a deal worth approximately $11 billion. The cash-and-stock deal is valued at about $160 per share, with Aspen Technology holders receiving $87 per share in cash and 0.42 shares in the combined company for each share they now own. Aspen Technology had been up nearly 13% over the past two sessions since reports of talks between the two companies first surfaced.
    Deere & Co. (DE) – Workers at the heavy equipment maker represented by the United Auto Workers Union rejected a tentative contract agreement. Union members say they want bigger raises and benefits than those proposed in the rejected six-year deal, based on strong profits for Deere.
    Xpeng (XPEV) – The China-based electric vehicle maker said it has surpassed 100,000 cars produced, coming six years after the company launched. Shares rose 1.4% in the premarket, while Chinese rival Nio (NIO) gained 1.7%.
    ConocoPhillips (COP) – The energy producer’s shares were downgraded to “neutral” from “buy” at Goldman Sachs, which cited valuation for the move. The stock has gained 88% this year and was up another 1.2% in the premarket.
    Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) – The steel and iron producer’s shares gained 2.1% in premarket trading after it announced the acquisition of iron scrap processor Ferrous Processing and Trading for about $775 million.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Tesla took 12 years to build 100,000 cars. China's Xpeng and Nio took about half that time

    U.S.-listed start-up Xpeng said Monday it has produced 100,000 cars — six years since the company launched.
    Its rival electric car start-up Nio said in April it reached that 100,000 vehicle production milestone.
    For comparison, Elon Musk’s Tesla took 12 years from the company’s launch in 2003 to produce 100,000 vehicles, according to public filings.

    Xpeng Motors launches the P5 sedan at an event in Guangzhou, China on April 14, 2021. The P5 is Xpeng’s third production model and features so-called Lidar technology.
    Arjun Kharpal | CNBC

    BEIJING — China’s electric car companies are racing to ramp up production, faster than Tesla did in its early days.
    U.S.-listed start-up Xpeng said Monday it has produced 100,000 cars — it came six years after the company launched.

    Rival electric car start-up Nio said in April it reached that 100,000 vehicle production milestone. The U.S.-listed company was founded in late Nov. 2014 under a different name, and became Nio in July 2017, about four years ago.
    For comparison, Elon Musk’s Tesla took 12 years from its launch in 2003 to produce 100,000 vehicles, according to public filings. Tesla has faced numerous production delays, especially in its early years. The U.S.-based electric car maker has since increased its production capacity with new factories in Shanghai an Berlin.
    To be clear, Tesla is still much larger in comparison.
    The electric carmaker crossed the 1 millionth car mark more than a year ago in March 2020, Musk said in a tweet.

    Production in the third quarter alone reached 238,000 vehicles. The company’s shares are up 11% year-to-date.

    Xpeng’s U.S.-listed shares are down 12% so far this year. Nio’s stock is down more than 25% year-to-date.
    Chinese electric battery and vehicle maker BYD said in May it produced 1 million passenger cars in the new energy vehicle category, which includes battery-only and hybrid-powered cars.
    BYD’s Hong Kong-traded shares are up more than 25% so far this year. The company’s backers include American billionaire Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway.

    Read more about electric vehicles from CNBC Pro

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Singapore's new 'vaccinated travel lanes' won't significantly increase risks, minister says

    Singapore already has similar travel lane arrangements with Germany and Brunei that started in September.
    S. Iswaran, Singapore’s transport minister and minister-in-charge of trade relations, said the country’s existing initiative with Germany and Brunei picked up only two cases of infected travelers – out of 3,000 people who entered Singapore through the so-called VTLs in the first month.
    Iswaran said the launching of the VTLs was part of efforts to reestablish the city-state as an international aviation hub.

    Singapore is set to open “vaccinated travel lanes” with more countries — but that doesn’t mean the country is taking on significantly higher risks, Transport Minister S. Iswaran told CNBC on Monday.
    The city-state announced last week that it will be launching more travel lanes for vaccinated travelers from South Korea, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, the U.K. and the U.S. That’s in addition to similar arrangements with Germany and Brunei that started in September.

    The initiative allows quarantine-free travel for those who are vaccinated, but travelers will have to take Covid-19 tests to ensure they are not infected with the virus before entering the country.
    Singapore will look into similar travel arrangements with Australia, New Zealand, Japan and “many other countries” in the region next, he added.

    Reopening international travel

    Iswaran, who is also Singapore’s minister-in-charge of trade relations, said the country’s existing initiative with Germany and Brunei picked up only two cases of infected travelers — out of 3,000 people who entered Singapore through the so-called VTLs in the first month.
    “So when you combine that with the vaccination requirement as well, actually the vaccinated travel lanes and the cross border flows that we’re facilitating do not increase the risk that we are taking as a country … significantly at all,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia.”

    We are finding paths to open up international aviation in a safe way and reclaim and rebuild Singapore’s status as an international aviation hub.

    S. Iswaran
    Singapore transport minister

    Iswaran was responding to some criticism online that the city-state’s plans to reopen international travel seemed at odds with its decision to impose some new restrictions within the country.

    Singapore on Saturday said it will tighten some Covid restrictions, aimed at protecting the vulnerable, such as the elderly and unvaccinated. Those who are not vaccinated will no longer be allowed to enter malls, and even those vaccinated will be subject to a limit of two people when entering malls.
    The minister pointed out that the VTLs demonstrated that only a limited number of infected cases were entering the country, but community infections have risen far more quickly — with a “significant proportion” spread through community activities.

    CNBC Health & Science

    On a “risk assessment basis,” there’s a need to limit some of those activities while allowing economic and general activity to continue “to the extent possible,” while also imposing some “important constraints,” Iswaran said.
    As of Oct. 9, 83% of the population has completed two doses of a Covid vaccine.
    However, the number of cases started spiking after some restrictions were loosened, and hit daily record highs last week to hover above 3,000.
    Last month, Singapore authorities tightened Covid measures again in a bid to blunt community transmissions and prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. The country has also started encouraging those infected with Covid, who are exhibiting mild symptoms, to self-isolate where possible.

    Singapore aims to reclaim global aviation hub status

    Iswaran said that the launch of the vaccinated travel lanes was part of efforts to reestablish the city-state as an international aviation hub.
    Pre-pandemic, Singapore’s Changi Airport was among the busiest in the world and handled 68.3 million passengers in 2019. However, that dropped more than 80% to only 11.8 million passengers in 2020, according to local media.

    “What we’re trying to do through our vaccinated travel lanes with countries in North America, in Europe and in Asia is really designed to emphasize that we are finding paths to open up international aviation in a safe way and reclaim and rebuild Singapore’s status as an international aviation hub,” Iswaran said.
    News of the expansion of its conditional travel lanes scheme sent aviation-related stocks soaring on Monday morning. Singapore Airlines surged 7.8% while SATS — which provides ground-handling and in-flight catering services — gained 5.04%.
    As of Sunday, the total number of infections stands at 126,966, with 162 deaths. However, 98.5% of infected people over the past 28 days had no symptoms or mild symptoms, according to the country’s health ministry.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Momentum, commitment, scale: Experts break down what it will take to hit climate goals

    IOT: Powering the digital economy

    The COP26 climate change summit, which will be held in Glasgow, Scotland, is looming.
    “The climate crisis is one thing that really unites us around a common issue”, says Sanda Ojiambo, CEO and executive director of the United Nations Global Compact, said.

    With just weeks to go until COP26 takes place in the Scottish city of Glasgow, discussions about sustainability, the environment and net-zero goals are at the forefront of many people’s minds.
    The stakes are high for the climate change summit, which will be hosted by the U.K. In a speech at the U.N. General Assembly last month, Prime Minister Boris Johnson described COP26 as “the turning point for humanity.”

    “We must limit the rise in temperatures — whose appalling effects were visible even this summer — to 1.5 degrees,” Johnson said. “We must come together in a collective coming of age,” he added. “We must show we have the maturity and wisdom to act.”
    Breaking things down, a broad range of topics will be addressed at COP26.

    This image shows onshore wind turbines in the Netherlands.
    Daniel Bosma | Moment | Getty Images

    Discussions about adaptation to climate change and the mobilization of finance to achieve climate-related goals will take place, while a document outlining the summit’s aims says countries have been “asked to come forward with ambitious 2030 emissions reductions targets … that align with reaching net zero by the middle of the century.”
    The ambitions of COP26 are lofty and getting all parties to agree on a common set of goals that will have a positive outcome for the planet represents a huge challenge.

    Collaboration will be key in Glasgow, and the importance of working together was touched upon in some detail during a recent debate moderated by CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick.

    “Right now, I think the climate crisis is one thing that really unites us around a common issue and a common issue that we must bring together,” Sanda Ojiambo, CEO and executive director of the United Nations Global Compact, said.
    Consisting of over 14,000 businesses, the U.N. Global Compact describes itself as the planet’s “largest corporate sustainability initiative.” A voluntary scheme, it’s centered around 10 principles focused on human rights, labor, anti-corruption and the environment.
    In addition, the Global Compact says it supports firms in taking “strategic actions to advance broader societal goals, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals, with an emphasis on collaboration and innovation.”

    For her part, Ojiambo articulated how fostering a sense of unity was so important when it came to tackling the tough challenges related to the climate.
    She said: “What excites me most … above and beyond the membership of the Global Compact, is the clarity of the fact that to address the climate crisis you do need partnership between government, between the private sector, civil society. And it really does have to be a multi-stakeholder, multilateral response.”
    It was put to Ojiambo that getting companies to come to an accord on such a wide range of issues must be a difficult task.
    “We don’t really ask for alignment across a whole host of issues,” she said. “What we do say at the Global Compact is embrace the 10 principles as being fundamental for responsible business.”
    “But in terms of the Sustainable Development Goals, it’s really a question of materiality,” she said, going on to stress the importance of having a laser focus on specific challenges.
    “If you’re sitting in an extractive industry, what is more material to you is certainly very different from if you’re in the banking industry, or in the hospitality industry,” she said.
    “So it then becomes a matter of materiality, and where you need to prioritize and have the most impact.”
    “But if I go to the fundamentals … we believe that embracing the principles that we have on human rights, labor, the environment and anti-corruption just make for better business.” 

    Read more about clean energy from CNBC Pro

    Businesses taking action is one thing but, as noted above, a variety of stakeholders will need to work together when it comes to ensuring efforts to tackle climate change are effective and long-term.
    For Adair Turner, who is chairman of the Energy Transitions Commission, a shift does seem to be taking place.
    “The good news is that, really, over the last two years, there has been a positive ambition loop … a self-reinforcing cycle between what governments are saying and what the private sector is saying,” he said.
    “You’ve had private sector companies increasingly realizing that with the technologies available, they can commit to get to net zero emissions by mid-century,” he added.
    “That [is] giving governments confidence that they can set that target and that [is] making it non-negotiable for businesses to then come in line with that target.” More

  • in

    The Nobel prize in economics celebrates an empirical revolution

    A “CREDIBILITY REVOLUTION” has transformed economics since the 1990s. Before that, theory ruled the roost and empirical work was a poor second cousin. “Hardly anyone takes data analysis seriously,” declared Edward Leamer of the University of California, Los Angeles, in a paper published in 1983. Yet within a decade, new and innovative work had altered the course of the profession, to such an extent that the lion’s share of notable new research today is empirical. For helping enable this transition David Card of the University of California at Berkeley shares this year’s economics Nobel prize, awarded on October 11th, with Joshua Angrist of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Guido Imbens of Stanford University.The messy real world can often defy economists’ attempts to establish causality. Working out how a rise in the minimum wage affects employment, for example, is complicated by the fact that some other influence (a chronically weak labour market, say) may have contributed to changes in both policy and employment. In other fields researchers establish causation by designing experiments where subjects are randomly assigned to different groups, only one of which receives a particular treatment, so that the effect of the treatment can be clearly seen. More economists are also using randomised controlled trials—indeed, the Nobel prize in 2019 rewarded such efforts. But many questions cannot be studied this way for reasons of politics, logistics or ethics.This year’s prizewinners surmounted such hurdles by using “natural experiments”, in which some quirk of history has an effect similar to an intentional trial. In a landmark paper published in 1994, Mr Card and Alan Krueger studied the impact of a minimum-wage increase in New Jersey by comparing the change in employment there with that in neighbouring Pennsylvania, where the wage floor was unchanged. Although theory predicted that a minimum-wage rise would be followed by a sharp drop in employment, such an effect, strikingly, did not seem to hold in practice. The paper inspired further empirical work and injected new energy into thinking about labour markets. Krueger, who died in 2019, would probably have shared the prize had he lived.The use of natural experiments quickly spread. Mr Card analysed another unique circumstance—Fidel Castro’s decision in 1980 to allow emigration out of Cuba—to examine the effects of immigration on local labour markets. About half the 125,000 Cubans who fled to America settled in Miami. By comparing the city’s experience with that in four other places that were similar in many respects, but which did not receive an influx of migrants, Mr Card found that neither the wages nor the employment of native workers suffered as a result of the migration.Mr Angrist, together with Krueger, used a similar technique to examine the impact of education on labour-market outcomes. Because students of a more scholastic disposition are likely both to spend more time in school and to earn more in work, what looks like a return to education could in fact reflect natural aptitude. In order to determine causality, the researchers made use of odd characteristics of America’s educational system. Although laws typically allowed students to drop out of school when they turned 16, all students born in the same year began school on the same date, regardless of their birthday. Those born in January, therefore, received more schooling, on average, than those born in December—and, the researchers found, also tended to earn more. Since the month of a student’s birth may be assumed to be random, they concluded that the added education caused the higher earnings.The study of schooling found that an extra year of education raised subsequent earnings by 9%. Such an effect seemed implausibly large to many economists. But that reflected a difference in definition, concluded Mr Angrist in work with Mr Imbens. The two scholars noted that the effect of a “treatment” would not be the same for everyone in a natural experiment. If the age at which students could drop out were raised from 16 to 17, for example, some would be forced to receive an additional year of schooling; others, who had always intended to stay in school for longer, would be unaffected.Together, the researchers developed statistical methods to make the conclusions from natural experiments more useful. Economists refer to the quirky factor used in natural experiments (like the birth month of a student) as an “instrument”. Messrs Angrist and Imbens explained the assumptions that need to hold in order for an instrument’s use to be valid: it must, for instance, only influence the outcome being studied (earnings, in this case) through its effect on the treatment (years of schooling), and not through other channels. By laying out these assumptions, the researchers allowed for more sophisticated analysis: the boost to earnings in the case above, for instance, only applies to students born early in the year and who are forced to stay in school for longer than they would have otherwise. Moreover, the methodology the researchers described improved the transparency of economists’ findings. The reader of a paper can judge for themselves how well an instrument satisfies the necessary assumptions, and discount the result accordingly.It’s only naturalThe credibility revolution, like any big upheaval, has had its excesses. Critics point to careless work and the mining of data in search of results that seem meaningful. Scholars are occasionally too eager to extrapolate findings from a particular natural experiment in ways that may not be justified, given the uniqueness of the circumstances. Yet the innovations developed by this year’s prizewinners unquestionably changed the field for good, illuminating questions once shrouded in darkness and forcing economists to push theory in directions that better describe real-world experience—a cause, indeed, for celebration. ■ More

  • in

    Tyson Fury says Deontay Wilder refused to show 'sportsmanship' after he knocked out American in third fight

    Tyson Fury finally ended his lengthy saga with Deontay Wilder after inflicting a crushing knockout in the 11th round.
    Fury had floored Wilder in the third round, but was dropped twice himself in the fourth.
    “I’m now the greatest heavyweight of my era, without a doubt,” said Fury.

    Tyson Fury (left) and Deontay Wilder exchange punches during their fight for the WBC heavyweight championship on October 9, 2021 in Las Vegas.
    Tom Hogan | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

    Tyson Fury says Deontay Wilder did not want to show “sportsmanship or respect” after he had knocked out the American in their third WBC heavyweight title fight.
    The British star finally ended his lengthy saga with Wilder after inflicting a crushing knockout in the 11th round to retain his WBC heavyweight title in Las Vegas.

    But Fury has accused Wilder of rejecting his words of respect when he went to the American’s corner after the fight.
    “I’m not going to make any excuses, Wilder is a top fighter,” said Fury.
    “He gave me a real run for my money tonight, and I always said I’m the best in the world and he’s the second best.
    “He’s got no love for me, Deontay Wilder, because you know why, because I beat him three times.
    “I’m a sportsman. I went over to him to show some love and respect and he didn’t want to give it back. That’s his problem.”

    To be a top fighting man, you’ve got to show guts and respect, and he couldn’t do it tonight, and that was it.

    Tyson Fury
    WBC heavyweight champion

    Revealing their verbal exchange, Fury told BT Sport Box Office: “I just said well done and he said, ‘I don’t want to show any sportsmanship or respect.’ I said, ‘No problem.’
    “Very surprised. Sore loser, an idiot.
    “To be a top fighting man, you’ve got to show guts and respect, and he couldn’t do it tonight, and that was it.”

    Read more stories from Sky Sports

    Fury had floored Wilder in the third round, but was dropped twice himself in the fourth, before he knocked down the Alabama man again in the 10th and then dramatically ended the fight.
    “I’ve got to say thank you to my trainer Sugarhill, because if it wasn’t for Sugar, America’s own, Detroit’s own, I wouldn’t have got through that fight tonight,” said Fury.
    “He told me. He said, ‘Get your jab working big dog, and throw that right hand down the middle. Only the big dogs pull it out late on in fights.’
    “I said, ‘Yes, I’ve got you,’ and I went and pulled it out of the bag.”
    Fury preserved his 32-fight unbeaten record, strengthening his status as the division’s leading champion after Anthony Joshua lost his WBA, IBF and WBO belts in last month’s unanimous decision defeat by Oleksandr Usyk.
    “I’m now the greatest heavyweight of my era, without a doubt,” said Fury.
    “No 1. Look what I’ve done.
    “I’ve come to America my last six fights and fought the most devastating puncher in the history of our sport.
    “Not once, not twice, but three times.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Start your holiday shopping now. Here are some goods that may be running out of stock

    The energy crises in mainland China and Europe are the latest to roil shipping. Capital Economics noted that the number of ships waiting outside Chinese ports has jumped again in recent weeks.
    Factory shutdowns in Vietnam, where many firms moved manufacturing to amid the U.S.-China trade dispute, have also affected the production of many goods.
    Here’s a list of goods that have been affected in the leadup to the year-end holiday shopping season.

    Supply chains everywhere have been hit by massive disruptions this year, from container shortages to floods and Covid infections setting off port closures.
    The energy crises in mainland China and Europe are the latest to roil shipping.

    Capital Economics noted that the number of ships waiting outside Chinese ports have jumped again in recent weeks, calling it “concerning.” According to the research firm, the 7-day average for the number of ships as of Sept. 30 was 206, compared with an average of 82 ships for 2019, before the pandemic.
    Julian Evans-Pritchard, senior China economist at the research firm, said that power rationing along the supply chain could be interfering with ports’ ability to ship orders.

    Factory shutdowns in Vietnam, where many firms moved manufacturing to amid the U.S.-China trade dispute, have also affected the production of many goods.
    Here’s a look at how recent developments have once again snarled shipping and what types of goods are affected in the leadup to the year-end holiday shopping season.

    Energy crises in China and Europe

    The power crunch in China has caused widespread disruptions as local authorities ordered power cuts at many factories. Europe is also grappling with a massive gas shortage.

    What’s happening in both regions is a perfect storm that’s disrupting supply chains globally, industry watchers and analysts say.
    Factories in China and Europe have temporarily shuttered or at least reduced output because of the energy crisis. More than 60 companies in China have suffered power-related disruptions so far, and the list is likely to grow, says Jena Santoro of Everstream Analytics.
    The biggest impact will be felt by consumers in the form of higher prices as inflated energy prices will cascade into increased manufacturing costs, said Dawn Tiura, president of the Sourcing Industry Group.
    What goods are being hit:
    1. Food
    Rising energy prices in Europe will have a “serious cascading effect” on the region’s food supply chains, says Tiura.
    “Major fertilizer plants were forced to curtail output because of the rising costs, and now farmers can’t produce enough food as a result,” she explained.
    2. Carbonated beverages, dry ice, packaged foods
    The pressure on fertilizer will also lead to a shortage of one “very interesting by-product” – carbon dioxide – which is used in a wide range of consumer products, says Per Hong, senior partner at consulting firm Kearney.
    “With curtailed fertilizer production, we almost certainly will be faced with a global shortage of CO2 that is used widely. CO2 is used extensively in the food value chain from inside packaged food to keep it fresher longer, for dry ice to keep frozen food cold during delivery, to giving carbonated beverages (like soda and beer) their bubbles,” he said.
    That points to the vulnerability of global food supply chains, Hong said.
    3. Apple iPhones, electronics, toys
    Several major Apple suppliers have suspended operations at their factories in China, according to Hong. In fact, the entire electronics industry — already reeling from the big chip shortage — is likely to suffer, he said.
    “While likely to normalize in the longer term, in the immediate near term these power restrictions and production cuts in China we are observing are likely to lead to export price hikes, worsening inflation into the holiday season,” Hong said, adding that goods such as toys and textiles are also likely to be affected.
    4. Christmas decorations
    Companies are warning there will be huge demand for Christmas decorations.
    “People hoping to buy a holiday tree and other decorations this holiday season better do so before Thanksgiving or risk paying through the nose or not having anything at all,” said Chris Butler, CEO of the National Tree Company, who said this was due to supply chain disruptions in China.
    Other sectors that would feel the biggest and most immediate impact from the crises include metals, chemicals and cement – all of which are energy intensive, said Pawan Joshi, executive vice president of supply chain software firm E2open.

    Shutdowns in Vietnam, Southeast Asia

    Factory shutdowns and worker shortages across Southeast Asia due to Covid are causing “significant short-term disruption, with production in Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia dropping “sharply,” says Gareth Leather, senior Asia economist at Capital Economics.
    The situation in Vietnam appears to be especially significant, as many companies moved their manufacturing there from China, amid the U.S.-China trade war.

    Companies with significant exposure to Vietnam include Nike (43%), Lululemon (33%) and Under Armour (40%), financial services firm BTIG said in a September note.
    What goods are being hit:
    1. Sports shoes and sportswear
    Shutdowns in Vietnam have led to a production loss of around 100 million to 150 million pairs of sports shoes, according to Bank of America estimates published in a note last week.
    BTIG noted footwear is being hit harder by the Vietnam shutdowns than sports apparel.
    Meanwhile, Lululemon CEO Calvin McDonald said in an earnings call last month that the Vietnam closures and port-related issues are contributing to disruptions within supply chains, and increased costs.
    2. Autos
    Factory shutdowns in Malaysia are hitting auto production, analysts say.
    Bank of America said in a recent note that supply bottlenecks will persist for some time, even as Malaysia starts to reopen.
    Disruptions to chip supply from Malaysia are also holding back car production in China, according to Capital Economics.
    Apart from sportswear, other industries which rely heavily on manufacturing in Vietnam include toys, clothes and even coffee, say analysts.

    Winter is coming

    Shortages of goods and price hikes are likely to get worse as winter approaches, says Santoro of Everstream Analytics.
    “As demand for gas naturally increases during the winter season, shortages are likely to intensify,” Santoro said. “Entering the season with low inventory levels and heightened demand also enables surging prices to continue an upward trajectory.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stock futures edge lower to start the week

    Traders work the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

    Stock futures edged lower Sunday night after finishing near the flat line Friday after investors shook off concerns about a much weaker-than-expected labor market report released on Friday.
    Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell 71 points, or 0.21%. S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures lost 0.28% and 0.33%, respectively.

    In regular trading Friday the Dow slipped 8.69 points to 34,746.25. The S&P 500 lost 0.2% to 4,391.34. The Nasdaq Composite fell 0.5% to 14,579.54.
    The markets responded to a disappointing jobs report that first sent the major averages lower, although investors’ concerns eased up after digesting the data and realizing things perhaps aren’t as bleak as the data initially suggested. The Labor Department reported Friday that the economy added just 194,000 jobs in September compared to the Dow Jones estimate of 500,000.
    “The three-month moving average on nonfarm payrolls is a solid 550,000,” Joe LaVorgna, chief Americas economist at Natixis CIB, said in a note. “At this pace, employment will recoup its pandemic-related losses by next July. The recovery in the jobs market has progressed enough that the Fed will initiate tapering next month with targeted completion around June next year.”

    Stock picks and investing trends from CNBC Pro:

    Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Independent Advisor Alliance, added that it would have taken an “extremely bad” jobs report to derail the Federal Reserve’s plan to begin removing stimulus and that although the report was “disappointing, without a doubt, we don’t believe it is bad enough to stop them.”
    Plus, the unemployment rate itself fell to 4.8%, much lower than economists’ forecast.

    This week, major banks will kick off their third-quarter earnings. JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Citigroup are scheduled to report beginning Wednesday. Delta Airlines and Walgreens Boots Alliance are also on deck.
    Analysts estimate an earnings growth rate of 27.6% for the S&P 500 in the third quarter and a 15% price increase for the index over the next 12 months, according to FactSet. However, the financials sector is expected to see the smallest price increase since it had the smallest upside difference between the bottom-up target price and the closing price on October 6.
    There is no economic data scheduled for Monday.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More