More stories

  • in

    Evidence still missing that end of extra unemployment pushed people back to work

    There remains little evidence that workers who lost federal unemployment benefits in June or July have rushed to find jobs, according to labor economists.
    Data suggests factors aside from enhanced benefits, like health and child care, have impacted the labor market to a larger degree.
    The dynamic suggests the Labor Day unemployment cliff may also not provoke a surge of job growth.

    A person reads a list of employers as they attend a job fair at SoFi Stadium on Sept. 9, 2021, in Inglewood, California.
    PATRICK T. FALLON | AFP | Getty Images

    There remains little evidence that states successfully nudged people back to work by ending federal unemployment benefits early, according to economists.
    Twenty-six states withdrew pandemic-era jobless support in June or July. Their governors, predominantly Republican, believed enhanced jobless aid offered an incentive to stay home instead of work.

    Data suggests other factors are playing a larger role, according to economists. They cite ongoing health concerns, child-care issues and expanded savings among a host of issues sidelining workers even amid record job openings.
    Federal benefit programs officially ended on Labor Day in the remaining states. This “unemployment cliff” impacted more than 8.5 million people, who lost all their benefits, Labor Department data issued Thursday suggests.
    More from Personal Finance:Student loan forgiveness is still up in the airThe child tax credit encourages parents to work, study findsWhy Democrats use $400,000 as the threshold for taxing ‘the rich’
    Workers’ muted response to the first unemployment cliff (i.e., in the states that withdrew early) suggests the Labor Day end also won’t provoke a surge of job growth, according to economists.
    “If that’s any sort of precursor, I’m not betting on the end of the federal benefits [on Labor Day] being a real clear and sharp inflection point,” AnnElizabeth Konkel, a labor economist at job site Indeed, said.

    State economies differ (in terms of job mix and worker demographics, for example), making comparisons and predictions difficult, she said.

    ‘Pressing issue’

    Understanding how the unemployment cliff will impact the U.S. labor market is a “pressing issue,” according to a JPMorgan Chase Bank research note published Thursday and authored by economist Peter McCrory.
    For example, those unable to find a job or return to work may struggle financially and pull back on spending, perhaps negatively impacting local economies.
    Most people (7 in 8) who lost federal aid in June were not reemployed by early August, according to a paper authored by researchers at Columbia University, Harvard University, the University of Massachusetts Amherst and the University of Toronto last month. That led to a nearly $2 billion aggregate spending cut, they found.

    JPMorgan economists have also “failed to find large effects” on jobs among early withdrawal states since mid-June, McCrory wrote. He examined data like monthly state employment metrics and weekly claims for unemployment benefits, as well as alternative measures like restaurant dining and Google job searches.
    “In fact, we find that the loss of benefits is associated with a modest decline in employment growth, earnings growth, and labor force participation,” McCrory wrote.
    While a “flood” of workers to the job market hasn’t materialized so far in those states, it’s still too early to understand if the impact will be similar in states where federal benefits ended on Sept. 6, according to Daniel Zhao, a senior economist at job site Glassdoor. (Sept. 6 was the official expiration provided by the American Rescue Plan, which Congress didn’t extend.)

    There are reasons to believe the impact may be more pronounced in the remaining half of states, he said. For one, the Labor Day cliff (which impacted big states like California and New York) affected a larger volume of workers than the one over the summer, perhaps making it easier to spot job impact in available data, he said.
    But the Covid delta variant (and its associated spike in cases) may be making unemployed workers nervous and leading employers to struggle finding people for open positions, especially for in-person work, economists said. Elevated caseloads may also be impacting parents’ ability to return to work due to school closures or student quarantines, for example.
    Americans are still sitting on elevated savings, perhaps partly due to enhanced benefits, allowing unemployed workers more time to find the best-fitting job, Zhao said. (Other government aid and cutbacks on in-person activities may have also helped bolster savings during the pandemic.)

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Here’s what Robinhood executives allegedly said internally at the height of the GameStop short squeeze

    New documents revealed in a lawsuit allegedly show internal conversations between executives during the height of January’s meme-stock chaos.
    In one instance, Robinhood Chief Operating Officer Gretchen Howard acknowledges that the start-up was facing a “major liquidity crisis,” according to the suit. Publicly, the company’s chief executive was saying the opposite.
    “This clearing thing seems pretty scary to me. I would say this is our biggest fire right now,” Robinhood’s director of engineering said in a Slack message, according to the lawsuit.

    Vlad Tenev, CEO and Co-Founder of Robinhood, in his office on July 15, 2021 in Menlo Park, California.
    Kimberly White | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    Robinhood executives had a lot to talk about the week Reddit users were driving a historic short squeeze in GameStop.
    New documents in a lawsuit allegedly show internal conversations between executives panicking over how to meet financial requirements, debating the severity of a Reddit-driven short squeeze and contradicting the CEO’s public statements.Plaintiffs in the claim, which was filed in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Florida, allege they suffered damages when Robinhood enacted trading restrictions on Jan. 28 amid volatile activity in GameStop and other meme stocks. They are suing for damages, interest and attorneys’ fees. Plaintiffs are also seeking class action status.

    “As a brokerage firm, we have many financial requirements, including SEC net capital obligations and clearinghouse deposits,” the brokerage said in a Jan. 28 blog post addressing the trading restrictions. “Some of these requirements fluctuate based on volatility in the markets and can be substantial in the current environment.”According to the suit, in one instance, Robinhood Chief Operating Officer Gretchen Howard messaged internally that the start-up was facing a “major liquidity crisis.” Publicly, the company’s chief executive said the opposite.
    “There was no liquidity problem,” CEO Vlad Tenev told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin a day later, on Jan. 29.
    A Robinhood spokesperson said the start-up met its liquidity obligations on January 28, and “fully satisfied its clearinghouse deposit requirement before the market opened.”

    Sharp rise in trading volume

    Robinhood and other brokerage firms saw unprecedented trading volume in January around heavily shorted stocks, including GameStop and AMC. The brokerage start-up, which has to deposit money to a clearinghouse based on the volume of trades, said it restricted buying of certain securities because the firm was unable to meet deposit requirements. These requirements increase when volatility goes up in case of large losses by options trades.
    “This clearing thing seems pretty scary to me — I would say this is our biggest fire right now,” Robinhood’s director of engineering allegedly said in a Slack message, adding that the company could see a margin call of hundreds of millions of dollars. “In the worst case scenario we max out our credit lines and they liquidate our positions.”

    According to the suit, David Dusseault, chief operating officer of subsidiary Robinhood Financial, said the company was “to [sic] big for them to actually shut us down,” referring to the National Securities Clearing Corp., a provider of centralized clearing services. In the same conversation, another executive, whose name is redacted, said “we’re going to get crucified” for stopping trades, according to the complaint.

    ‘A tidal wave of volume and volatility’

    The chats were part of the discovery process in a lawsuit against Robinhood. An attorney for the plaintiffs argued that Robinhood knew the Reddit-driven chaos was coming and didn’t do enough.
    “Robinhood and its higher-ups were well aware of this tidal wave of volume and volatility that was heading in their direction,” Maurice Pessah, founder of Pessah Law Group, told CNBC. “In our opinion and as we allege in the lawsuit, they didn’t do their jobs and what they are required to do in terms of analyzing risks and managing risks as a broker.”
    In response, Robinhood said it disputes the plaintiff allegations and stands by public statements regarding Jan. 28. A company spokesperson also said “the communications are consistent with Robinhood’s focus to take appropriate, incremental measures to mitigate risk.”
    In another excerpt, data scientists and Tenev debated how intense the Reddit frenzy could get, according to the suit.
    “Maybe I am being alarmist but I think we should consider all-hands on deck kind of situation and shuffle some priorities to deal with increasing volumes,” Robinhood’s director of engineering allegedly wrote. The company’s head of data science responded “you may not be being an alarmist” after seeing a chart showing the spike in volume, plaintiffs alleged.
    “Today was a huge day. There are internal things that are starting to buckle under pressure,” another software engineer said, according to the suit.
    Tenev allegedly responded that “only the paranoid survive.” His response to a comment that “one who panics first panics best” was “joy.”
    In another message, the company acknowledged “blowback from this is going to be exponentially worse as time goes on” and they “were worried about the long term affects [sic] of this,” according to the suit.
    In the months that followed these conversations, Robinhood’s CEO as well as the CEOs of Citadel and Melville Capital testified in front of Congress. Tenev told the representatives that the GameStop mania was a 1 in 3.5 million event, which he called “unmodelable” and that Robinhood’s risk management processes kicked in as they were meant to. In order to meet capital requirements and shore up its balance sheet, Robinhood raised more than $3.4 billion in a matter of days.
    The company went on to a blockbuster public listing in August.
    Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler is expected to publish a report on the GameStop saga in the coming weeks, as well as recommendations on what, if any, changes should be made to the U.S. trading system as a result.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Costco, Nike and FedEx are warning there's more inflation set to hit consumers as holidays approach

    A slew of factors including rising shipping cost and supply chain bottlenecks are persisting and should last through the upcoming holiday season.
    One issue is that the cost to ship containers overseas has soared in recent months.
    Many companies have indicated that consumers at least for now are willing to take on higher prices.
    Rising inflation expectations could cause the Federal Reserve to change policy course.

    A worker wearing a protective mask removes rotisserie chicken from skewers inside a Costco store in San Francisco, California, on Wednesday, March 3, 2021.
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Shipping bottlenecks that have led to rising freight costs are cooking up a holiday headache for U.S. retailers.
    Costco this week joined the long list of retailers sounding the alarm about escalating shipping prices and the accompanying supply chain issues. The warehouse retailer, which had a similar cautionary tone in May, was joined by athletic wear giant Nike and economic bellwethers FedEx and General Mills in warning of similar concerns.

    The cost to ship containers overseas has soared in recent months. Getting a 40-foot container from Shanghai to New York cost about $2,000 a year and a half ago, just before the Covid pandemic. Now, it runs some $16,000, according to Bank of America.
    In a conference call Thursday with analysts, Costco Chief Financial Officer Richard Galanti called freight costs “permanent inflationary items” and said those increases are combining with things that are “somewhat permanent” to drive up pressure. They include not only freight but also higher labor costs, rising demand for transportation and products, plus shortages in computer chips, oils and chemicals and higher commodity prices.

    “We can’t hold on to all those,” Galanti said. “Some of that has to be passed on, and it is being passed on. We’re pragmatic about it.”
    Quantifying the situation, he said inflation is likely to run between 3.5% and 4.5% broadly for Costco. He noted that paper products have seen cost increases of 4% to 8% and he cited shortages of plastic and pet products that are driving up prices from 5% to 11%.
    “We can hold the line on some of those things and do a little better job — hopefully do a better job than some of our competitors have and be even that more extreme than the value,” Galanti said. “So I think all those things so far, at least despite the challenges, have worked in our favor a little bit.”

    Getting ready for the holidays

    The timing, though, is not good.
    Persistent inflationary pressures come at a time when retailers are preparing for the holiday shopping season – Halloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas, then into the new year. The pandemic has brought with it a relentless slew of factors that has made inflation an economic buzzword after a generation of mostly moderate price pressures.
    Companies are pressed to deal with the situation ahead of a critical period.
    “Getting closer to the holidays, we have been working with retailers and what we see is, No. 1, they’ve got to be flexible with their supply chain,” said Keith Jelinek, managing director of the global retail practice at consulting firm Berkeley Research Group. “We’ve seen cost-of-good increases especially in apparel, also costs of inbound shipping with the costs of containers, increases with transportation, trucking to get into distribution centers.”
    “All these costs are going to hit the operating profits,” he added. “Retailers right now are really challenged with how much can I pass onto the consumer vs. can I get other efficiencies out of my operations in order to hit my total margin.”
    Many companies have indicated that consumers at least for now are willing to take on higher prices. Trillions in government stimulus during the pandemic have helped swell personal wealth, with household net worth up 4.3% in the second quarter.
    No one knows how long consumers will be willing to pay higher prices. Jelinek said he expects the current situation to persist into at least through the holiday season and into the early part of next year
    “There’s only so much you can pass on to the consumer,” he said. “What most retailers are doing is looking across their [profit and loss statements] and they’re looking to improve performance and to optimize efficiency. That means really focusing on their supply chain.”
    It also means raising prices.

    Company warnings

    FedEx this week announced that it will hike shipping rates 5.9% for domestic services and 7.9% for other offerings. The company said it is being hit by labor shortages and “costs associated with the challenging operating environment.”
    The head of the company’s chief competitor acknowledged the hurdles the business faces.
    “The labor market is tight, and in certain parts of the country we’ve had to make some market-rate adjustments to react to the demands of the market,” UPS CEO Carol Tome said Thursday on CNBC’s “Closing Bell.”
    She added that the company also has been hit by supply chain issues.
    “I’m afraid this is going to last for a while. These issues have been a long time coming and it’s going to take all of us working together to clear those blockages,” Tome said.
    Federal Reserve officials this week conceded that inflation will be higher in 2021 than they had anticipated. However, they still see prices settling to a more normal range just above 2% in the coming years.
    But Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester said in a speech Friday that she sees “upside risks” to the central bank’s inflation forecasts.
    “Many businesses report that cost pressures are intensifying and consumers seem to be willing to pay higher prices,” she said. “The combination of strong demand and supply chain challenges could last longer than I anticipate and could lead people and businesses to raise their expectations for future inflation more than we have seen so far.”
    Fed officials said they are ready to start pulling back on the monetary stimulus they’ve provided during the pandemic but probably won’t be raising rates soon. However, Mester said that should prices and expectations hold higher, Fed policy “would need to be adjusted” to control inflation.

    Become a smarter investor with CNBC Pro.Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV.Sign up to start a free trial today.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Carnival, Nike, Match and more

    The Carnival Cruise Ship ‘Carnival Vista’ heads out to sea in the Miami harbor entrance known as Government Cut in Miami, Florida June 2, 2018.
    RHONA WISE | AFP | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading.
    Carnival — Carnival shares rose 3% after the cruise line said voyages for the third quarter were cash flow positive and expects this to continue. Shares of Norwegian Cruise Line gained about 3% and Royal Caribbean added 2.8%.

    Match Group — Shares of Match Group rose about 4% after the online dating platform announced on Thursday that it will sell shares of its common stock in a registered direct offering. The price per share and number of shares of common stock issued will be calculated by a volume-weighted average price during a five-day averaging period starting Friday, the company said.
    Merck — Shares of the pharmaceutical giant rose 0.8% on Friday after Merck and AstraZeneca announced that treatment using the drug Lynparza showed positive results in a phase-three trial. The trial results suggest that the treatment slows the progression of prostate cancer and show a trend toward increased survival, the companies said.
    Nike — The apparel stock fell 6.3% after Nike cut its full-year guidance for sales growth. The company said supply chain issues in Vietnam were slowing sales. Nike now projects mid-single-digit revenue growth for its 2022 fiscal year, down from prior guidance of low-double-digit growth.
    Costco — Shares of the retailer jumped 3.3% following Costco’s fourth-quarter results. The company beat top- and bottom-line estimates during the quarter, earning $3.90 per share excluding items on $62.68 billion in revenue. Analysts surveyed by Refinitiv were expecting $3.57 per share on $61.3 billion in revenue.
    Salesforce — Salesforce extended its Thursday gains, rising 2.8% after Piper Sandler upgraded the stock to overweight from neutral, saying it’s confident the company could see “a multi-year period of multiple and profit expansion.” The stock jumped on Thursday after the software company raised its full-year 2022 revenue guidance.

    Coinbase — Shares of the cryptocurrency exchange slid about 2.4% even after Needham reiterated the stock as a buy. Cryptocurrencies plunged Friday morning on news that China is issuing yet another crypto crackdown. Coinbase derives 90% of its revenue from retail transactions, which is highly correlated with crypto asset prices, according to Needham, so its stock price tends to move in tandem with cryptocurrencies.
    Cheesecake Factory, Dave & Buster’s — Cheesecake Factory and Dave & Buster’s added 5.1% and 4.3%, respectively, after Jefferies upgraded the restaurant stocks to buy from hold. “We are incrementally more positive on the full service category following delta/inflation sell-off and exuberant Consensus forecasts reigned in,” Jefferies said.
    Roku — Roku shares fell 3.8% after Wells Fargo downgraded the video streaming platform to equal weight from overweight. Wells Fargo said rising competition makes expectations for Roku’s revenue growth likely too high.
    — CNBC’s Jesse Pound, Pippa Stevens and Tanaya Macheel contributed reporting

    Become a smarter investor with CNBC Pro. Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV. Sign up to start a free trial today

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    'The View' pulls 2 hosts off the air over positive Covid tests, minutes before interview with Vice President Harris

    Two hosts of “The View” tested positive for Covid-19 on Friday moments before a sit-down interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. 
    Host Sunny Hostin and guest host Ana Navarro are fully vaccinated and contracted breakthrough cases of the virus, co-host Joy Behar announced on air.
    Harris, who had flown to New York on Friday morning, did not make contact with the hosts before the show, a White House official told NBC News. She conducted her interview remotely in a different ABC studio. 

    Ana Navarro and Sunny Hostin on the set of ABC’s The View.
    Jeff Neira | Disney General Entertainment Content | Getty Images

    Two hosts of ABC’s “The View” tested positive for Covid-19 on Friday moments before a sit-down interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. 
    Host Sunny Hostin and guest host Ana Navarro are fully vaccinated and contracted breakthrough cases of the virus, co-host Joy Behar announced on air after they were ushered off the set and the program went to an impromptu commercial break. 

    Harris, who had flown to New York on Friday morning, did not make contact with the hosts before the show, a White House official told NBC News. She conducted her interview remotely in a different ABC studio. 
    Harris didn’t isolate after “The View” appearance and will follow her schedule as planned, spokeswoman Sabrina Singh said.
    “No matter how hard we try, these things happen,” Behar said on air. “They’ll be OK, I’m sure, because they’re both vaccinated up the wazoo.”
    Harris eventually appeared in a virtual interview with Behar at around 11:50 a.m. ET after being expected to appear at the top of the show.
    “I hope you are in a safe spot right now. We did everything we could to make sure that you were safe because we value you so much,” Behar said, introducing the vice president.

    Harris, in response, called the two hosts “strong women” and lauded Covid vaccines. 
    “I know they’re fine, but it really also does speak to the fact that they’re vaccinated and vaccines really make all the difference because otherwise we would be concerned about hospitalization and worse,” Harris said in the delayed interview.

    U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris descends from Air Force Two at Newport News/Williamsburg International Airport, in Newport News, Virginia, U.S., September 10, 2021.
    Tom Brenner | Reuters

    Both Harris and President Joe Biden, as well as their spouses, are fully vaccinated against Covid. 
    The Biden administration has gone to great lengths to increase Covid vaccination rates in the nation, issuing a series of mandates in the past two months. 
    Most recently, the administration issued sweeping vaccine mandates earlier this month that affect private businesses and federal employees. Government personnel and contractors are required to get vaccinated with no alternative for testing, and any company with more than 100 staff must implement vaccine mandates with some medical and religious exemptions. 
    Biden also mandated on in early August that all service members to get vaccinated by mid-September.
    On Friday, the president blamed the more than 70 million unvaccinated Americans for stalling the U.S. economic recovery, and condemned elected officials who have worked to undermine his administration’s Covid efforts with false information.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    House passes bill to protect abortion rights in response to restrictive Texas law

    House Democrats approved a bill to protect abortion rights, a symbolic response to the Supreme Court’s refusal to block a Texas law banning most abortions.
    The House vote is seen as a show of solidarity, given that the bill, the Women’s Health Protection Act, will face steep opposition from Senate Republicans.
    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi worked quickly to schedule action on the bill in response to the Texas law, which effectively prohibits abortions after six weeks.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a news conference about the House vote on H.R. 3755, the “Women’s Health Protection Act” legislation to “establish a federally protected right to abortion access” at the Capitol in Washington, U.S., September 24, 2021.
    Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

    House Democrats on Friday approved wide-ranging legislation to protect abortion rights, a swift but mostly symbolic response to the Supreme Court’s refusal to block a Texas law banning most abortions.
    The bill, which passed 218-211, is principally a show of solidarity, given that the bill, the Women’s Health Protection Act, will face steep opposition from Senate Republicans and is not expected to advance through the chamber.

    Democrats believe the bill would guarantee the right to abortion through federal law and cement the decision of Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a constitutional right to the procedure.
    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., worked quickly to schedule action on the bill after the high court earlier this month refused to block a controversial Texas law that prohibits abortions after roughly six weeks, before most even realize they are pregnant.

    Specifically, the Texas law says doctors may not perform abortions if a fetal heartbeat can be detected, activity that usually begins at around six weeks of gestation. That law went into effect on Sept. 1.
    The Texas law does not make exceptions for pregnancies that result from rape or incest, and it is unprecedented in deputizing private citizens to sue anyone who performs the procedure or “aids and abets” it.
    Pelosi offered comments prior to the bill’s passage Friday morning and offered a pointed rebuke to the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision earlier this month. The justices who voted not to block the law focused on procedural questions and stressed that they have yet to judge the constitutionality of the law.

    “This is about freedom. About freedom of women to have choice about the size and timing of their families, not the business of people on the [Supreme] Court or members of Congress,” the House speaker said.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Rep. Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat from Washington and chairwoman of the Progressive Caucus, said from the House floor that she has had an abortion and urged fellow lawmakers not to criminalize the procedure.
    “One in four women across America have had an abortion. I am one of them,” she said prior to the bill’s passage. “Terminating my pregnancy, Madam Speaker, was not an easy choice for me. But it was my choice. It is time to preserve that for all people.”
    The act would establish a statutory right for health-care providers to provide, and patients to receive, abortion care without certain limitations or requirements.
    Specifically, the bill would give patients the right to an abortion without medically unnecessary tests or procedures — generally understood to include ultrasounds, counseling or mandatory waiting periods. It also would bar states from imposing in-person clinic visits prior to obtaining an abortion, often referred to as “two-trip” requirements.
    The bill would bar states from prohibiting any abortion prior to fetal viability. It also would bar the prohibition of an abortion after fetal viability if, in the health-care provider’s good-faith judgment, continuing the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.
    Despite its long odds in the Senate, the House-approved bill may provide Democrats with fuel in the 2022 midterms and a strong talking point for voters who view the Supreme Court’s recent decision as eroding rights many believed to be settled law.
    Republicans, including Rep. Julia Letlow of Louisiana, protested the bill ahead of the House vote and argued that it goes beyond the Roe decision.
    Specifically, members of the GOP say the bill strips states of their ability to regulate abortion. They also argue that the measure would prevent states from introducing measures to make abortions safer and lead to many more procedures in the late stages of pregnancy.
    “As a woman, and most importantly, a mother of two children, I feel uniquely qualified to speak about this,” Letlow said from the House floor.
    “The legislation before us is perhaps the most extreme abortion measure that Congress has ever considered,” she added. “It will overturn countless protections for the unborn that states have already put into place.”
    The Senate, narrowly controlled by Democrats, may not take up the bill since it remains unclear whether a majority of the chamber supports it.
    Two Democrats, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, have not joined the rest of their colleagues in cosponsoring the Senate’s version of the bill and are expected to oppose it. Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican who has supported abortion rights in the past, has reportedly said she will not support the bill in its current form.
    Even if Democrats managed to scrape together a majority of the Senate, it is nearly certain that Republicans would filibuster the bill and prevent it from advancing with less than 60 votes.
    A group of abortion providers and advocates asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to quickly review their challenge to the Texas law.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Nike can turn its snarled supply chain to its advantage to boost its direct-to-consumer business

    Nike slashed its fiscal 2022 revenue outlook Thursday because of the temporary bottlenecks plaguing the logistics of its business.
    The pressures have tightened Nike’s inventories ahead of the holidays.
    This means it will be much more strategic about where it’s stocking merchandise. And the dynamics will likely accelerate the sneaker giant’s direct-to-consumer push.
    “Strong brands get stronger in this environment,” CFO Matt Friend said.

    A pedestrian walks past American multinational sport clothing brand, Nike store and its logo seen in Hong Kong.
    Budrul Chukrut | SOPA Images | LightRocket | Getty Images

    A lower sales forecast, slowing growth in China and a bottlenecked supply channel — the news coming out of Nike’s fiscal first-quarter earnings report wasn’t good.
    Shares were down more than 6% on Friday afternoon following the report. Ahead of the results, shares had already tumbled roughly 9% from an all-time high of $174.38, which it hit in August.

    Amid the sell-off some analysts see an opportunity for Nike to position its business — and its stock — for greater growth. Nike’s supply chain struggles are providing it with cover to accelerate its direct-to-consumer strategy, which has been a key driver of profitability in recent quarters.
    It now takes Nike roughly 80 days to get goods from Asia to North America, which is double pre-pandemic transit times. Manufacturing facilities across Vietnam are beginning to reopen, but Nike has lost about 10 weeks of production due to pandemic shutdowns. About 43% of its total footwear and apparel units are made in the country.
    For the next few quarters, Nike predicts consumer demand will outweigh supply. This means Nike will need to be much more strategic about where it’s stocking running shoes and workout tops. It will likely opt for its own stores, over wholesale partners.
    “As long as inventory is constrained, it’s fair to assume the pivot to direct will be accelerated,” BMO Capital Markets analyst Simeon Siegel said. “They’re prioritizing their own channels with product first.”
    Before the Covid pandemic struck, Nike was on a path to grow its direct-to-consumer business. It has been cutting partnerships with some wholesale retailers, while building its online business and opening Nike stores around the world. Over the past three years, Nike has pulled out of about 50% of its wholesale accounts.

    Nike calls the transition a “consumer direct offense,” a play on sports terminology. In fiscal 2021, Nike’s direct revenue represented roughly 39% of sales for the Nike brand, up from 35% in the prior year. Selling more goods at full price has also been aiding profits. Nike’s gross margins for fiscal 2021 grew to 44.8%, from 43.4% in 2020.
    Industrywide supply-chain havoc could accelerate Nike’s DTC push at an even faster clip and in turn drive profitability higher.

    Nike ‘still has the demand’

    “This means Nike now gets a free excuse to accelerate its DTC transition and say, ‘We don’t have the supplies to get to our wholesalers,'” said Stacey Widlitz, president of SW Retail Advisors, in an interview. “This is a major opportunity, because you’re seeing all of these other brands cut wholesale, but they don’t have the top line like Nike. Nike still has the demand.”
    And even if Nike’s shelves are a bit bare in the coming months compared with normal times, Widlitz said, she doesn’t think it will permanently drive shoppers away to other retailers.
    “People are always going to be drawn back to the big brands,” she said. “It’s the greatest pent-up demand, because they are basically telling the consumer, ‘You can’t have it right now.’ You’re creating FOMO [fear of missing out] by not having supply. It’s a no-brainer to take advantage of that.”
    On Thursday’s earnings call, Nike’s management team said it is prioritizing its direct channels.
    Nike’s top partners include Foot Locker, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Nordstrom, and investors in these stocks are concerned about what Nike’s troubles will mean for their businesses. On Friday, Foot Locker shares were down more than 6%, while Dick’s shares shed nearly 2%. Nordstrom’s stock was about flat.
    Chief Financial Officer Matt Friend said temporary supply chain disruptions will “likely trigger an even greater acceleration in the transformation of the marketplace — toward Nike and our most important wholesale partners.”
    “We’re going to have lean inventory,” he said. But he added, “Strong brands get stronger in this environment.”
    And according to Citi analyst Paul Lejuez, a temporary supply chain problem is a much better issue to have than a demand problem. He doesn’t see Nike as having a demand problem.
    “We view these supply chain disruptions as transitory … and [the delays] are impacting the athletic footwear space broadly,” Lejuez said in a research note. “The most significant impacts from Vietnam factory closures should happen post-holiday.”

    Another way to shore up growth

    Strengthening Nike’s North American business will be even more important if growth in China slows. Greater China has long been Nike’s most profitable and important growth market. But in Nike’s latest quarter, revenue in the region grew the slowest of all geographies.
    Chief Executive John Donahoe said Nike is playing the long game in China. Supply constraints will impact the region’s second-quarter performance, he said, but the company will “invest for the long term, and we’re confident in the long-term opportunity.”
    Wall Street research firm UBS said it expects Nike’s stock to bounce back from Friday’s sell-off. UBS has a $185 price target on shares, with a buy rating. Nike was trading around $149 per share by Friday afternoon. Analysts’ average rating on shares is $184.35, according to FactSet.
    “While some uncertainty still exists around how long it will take supply chain issues to clear up and if Nike’s China sales growth rate will accelerate, our view is investor sentiment will improve now that Nike has quantified the Vietnam factory shutdown impact,” analyst Jay Sole said. “We believe most investors will look to fiscal 2023 and see a rebound scenario.”
    — CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed to this report.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    American Airlines pilots want managers replaced over flight disruptions

    American Airlines pilots’ union said middle managers should be replaced over flight disruptions.
    The Allied Pilots Association is in the middle of contract negotiations with the company.

    Pilots talk as they look at the tail of an American Airlines aircraft at Dallas-Ft Worth International Airport.
    Mike Stone | Reuters

    American Airlines pilots’ union says that company managers should be replaced because of the hundreds of flight disruptions that affected tens of thousands of customers this year.
    The board of directors of the Allied Pilots Association this week approved a resolution that calls on the company to change out the managers responsible for the airline’s operations, saying that staff failed to provide a reliable service and in turn, hurt the carrier’s brand.

    The board of directors “believes it is in the best interest of the American Airlines shareholders, employees, the communities it serves, and the traveling public for the management team members who control the American Airlines operation be replaced,” said the resolution. The union isn’t seeking top management be removed.
    The resolution said 60,000 customers were affected by cancellations over Father’s Day weekend in June.
    American had cut its schedule by about 1% in early July amid staffing shortages. The carrier and other airlines including Southwest have had to trim ambitious flight schedules after a lack of workers exacerbated flight disruptions over the summer.
    American declined to comment on the union’s resolution but provided a company memo sent to pilots before Labor Day that said that pilot staffing had improved during the summer.
    “We feel good about where we are today and have worked hard to be able to ensure we are set up for success the rest of this year and beyond,” the memo said.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More