More stories

  • in

    Tariffs are ‘simply inflationary,’ economist says: Here’s how they fuel higher prices

    Tariffs are expected to raise the U.S. inflation rate in 2025, Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday.
    U.S. businesses pass tariff costs on to consumers, both directly and indirectly, economists said.
    An increase in the inflation rate may be relatively short-lived, if tariffs amount to a one-time price increase, economists said.

    Fang Dongxu/VCG via Getty Images

    There was an oft-repeated message in Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell’s press conference on Wednesday: Tariffs will raise consumer prices.
    The U.S. central bank raised its inflation forecast for 2025, as have many economists, due to the expected impact of a trade war initiated by the Trump administration.

    “A good part of it is coming from tariffs,” Powell said of the Fed’s elevated inflation estimate.
    “I do think with the arrival of the tariff inflation, further progress may be delayed,” Powell said.
    His statement comes at a time when pandemic-era inflation has gradually declined but hasn’t yet been fully tamed to the Fed’s goal of a 2% annual inflation rate.
    “Tariffs are simply inflationary, despite what [President] Donald Trump may tell people,” said Bradley Saunders, a North America economist at Capital Economics.

    Why tariffs raise consumer prices

    Tariffs are a tax on imports. U.S.-based importers — say, clothing retailers or supermarkets — pay the tax so goods can clear customs and enter the country.

    Tariffs raise prices for consumers in a few ways, economists said.
    For one, tariffs add costs for U.S. businesses, which may charge higher prices at the store rather than take a hit on profits, Saunders said.
    Tariffs are a protectionist economic policy, meaning they seek to protect U.S. businesses from international competition by making foreign products more expensive.
    Consumers may switch to a U.S. product rather than pay a higher price for the foreign counterpart. However, that logic may not pan out. The U.S. substitute was likely more expensive than the foreign product to start, Saunders said — otherwise, why wouldn’t consumers buy the U.S.-produced good to begin with?
    So tariffs may still leave the consumer paying more, whichever products they choose to buy, he said.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell delivers remarks at a news conference following a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting at the Federal Reserve on March 19, 2025 in Washington, DC.
    Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

    Tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico, for example, would cost the typical U.S. household about $1,200 a year, according to a February analysis by economists at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. (This analysis modeled the direct costs of a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico, and 10% additional tariff on China.)
    The president’s economic agenda, including tariffs, will create new jobs, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in response to a request for comment from CNBC about the inflationary impact of tariffs.

    Indirect tariff impact

    Trump has imposed a slew of tariffs since taking office in January.
    The Trump administration raised levies on imports from China and on many products from Canada and Mexico — the three biggest trade partners of the U.S. It put 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum and plans to put reciprocal tariffs on all U.S. trade partners in April. The White House also signaled duties on copper and lumber are forthcoming.
    More from Personal Finance:Why uncertainty makes the stock market go haywireFederal Reserve holds interest rates steadyWhat could happen to your student loans without the Education Department
    During his first term, President Trump imposed tariffs on about $380 billion of imports, in 2018 and 2019, according to the Tax Foundation. The Biden administration kept most of them intact.
    This time around, the tariffs are much broader. They currently impact more than $1 trillion, the Tax Foundation said. The sum will increase to $1.4 trillion if temporary exemptions for some Canadian and Mexican products lapse in early April, it said.
    It was largely a “U.S.-China” trade war during Trump’s first term, Saunders said. “Now it’s a “U.S.-everyone trade war,” he said.
    There are indirect consumer impacts from tariffs, too, economists said.
    To that point, many U.S. companies use products subject to tariffs to manufacture their goods.

    Take steel, for example: Automakers, construction firms, farm-equipment manufacturers and many other businesses use steel as a production input.
    Tariffs may raise auto prices by $4,000 to as much as $12,500, depending on different factors like vehicle type, according to an estimate by consulting firm Anderson Economic Group.
    Builders estimate that recent tariffs will add $9,200 to the cost of a typical home, according to the National Association of Home Builders.
    Economic studies suggest that, while tariffs may create jobs in certain protected U.S. industries, they ultimately cost U.S. jobs on a net basis, after accounting for retaliation and higher production costs for other industries.
    “By trying to protect certain industries, you can actually make other industries more vulnerable,” Lydia Cox, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who studies international trade, said during a recent webinar.

    Short-term ‘pain’?

    Trump has said the administration’s tariff policy may cause short-term “pain” for Americans.
    Economists stress that there’s ample uncertainty, and that a bump in inflation may be temporary rather than something that raises prices consistently over the long term.
    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent alluded to this outcome during a recent CNBC interview.
    “Tariffs are a one-time price adjustment,” Bessent said. He also the Trump administration was “not getting much credit” for falling costs of oil and mortgages rates.

    The Federal Reserve raised its 2025 inflation forecast by 0.3 percentage points to 2.8% in its summary of economic projections issued Wednesday, up from its 2.5% estimate in December. (This projection is for the “core” Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index. PCE is the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, and core prices strip out the volatile food and energy categories.)
    Similarly, Goldman Sachs Research expects core PCE to “reaccelerate” to 3% in 2025, up about half a percentage point from its prior forecast.
    “It’s really hard to know how this is going to work out,” Fed chair Powell said. More

  • in

    Boston Celtics sold for $6.1 billion to group led by private equity executive Bill Chisholm

    The Boston Celtics are being sold to an ownership group led by private equity executive Bill Chisholm.
    The deal values the Celtics franchise at $6.1 billion, a record for a U.S. sports team.
    Majority owner Wyc Grousbeck will stay on as team CEO and governor through 2028.

    A group led by private equity executive Bill Chisholm is buying the National Basketball Association’s reigning champion Boston Celtics at a valuation of $6.1 billion, the team’s ownership announced Thursday.
    Private equity firm Sixth Street is part of the new ownership group and will contribute more than $1 billion, one person familiar with the matter said. Other members of the ownership group include Boston-area businessman Rob Hale, a current team owner, and Bruce Beal Jr., president of real estate firm Related Companies.

    “Growing up on the North Shore and attending college in New England, I have been a die-hard Celtics fan my entire life,” Chisholm said in a Thursday news release. “I understand how important the Celtics are to the city of Boston — the role the team plays in the community is different than any other city in the country. I also understand that there is a responsibility as a leader of the organization to the people of Boston, and I am up for this challenge.”
    The Celtics’ current ownership group, Boston Basketball Partners, is led by the Grousbeck family. Wyc Grousbeck, the team’s CEO and governor, will remain in those roles through the 2027-28 season. If approved, the sale will go through this summer.

    Owner Wyc Grousbeck of the Boston Celtics reacts as he holds the Larry O’Brien Championship Trophy during the 2024 Boston Celtics championship parade following their 2024 NBA Finals win on June 21, 2024 in Boston, Massachusetts. 
    Billie Weiss | Getty Images

    “Bill is a terrific person and a true Celtics fan, born and raised here in the Boston area,” Grousbeck said in a statement. “His love for the team and the city of Boston, along with his chemistry with the rest of the Celtics leadership, make him a natural choice to be the next Governor and controlling owner of the team.”
    The NBA declined to comment.
    It is unclear how much Chisholm, co-founder of the firm Symphony Technology Group, will personally pay as part of the deal.

    The $6.1 billion sale price is the highest for a team in U.S. sports history, surpassing the $6.05 billion deal for the National Football League’s Washington Commanders in 2023. The Celtics’ total valuation could reach $7.3 billion by 2028 depending on the league’s overall performance, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC.
    CNBC Sport’s Official NBA Team Valuations list released in February had estimated the Celtics franchise to be worth $5.5 billion. The top-valued team was the Golden State Warriors at $9.4 billion.
    The sale of the Celtics to a large ownership group comes as sports franchise valuations skyrocket, making it more difficult for individuals or families to buy a team themselves. The NFL last year followed the NBA and other major leagues in allowing private equity firms to take stakes in teams.
    Soaring media rights payments have contributed to rapid growth in team valuations. The 11-year, $76 billion agreement the NBA signed with Walt Disney, NBCUniversal and Amazon starting next season more than doubled the annual value of the league’s previous media deal.
    The Celtics have won 18 championships, the most in the history of the NBA. The team has the second-best record in the NBA’s Eastern Conference this season and is considered a strong contender to win its second consecutive title.
    — CNBC’s Michael Ozanian, Leslie Picker and Scott Wapner contributed to this story.
    Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. More

  • in

    Edible Arrangements’ parent company is launching a marketplace for the other kind of edibles

    Edible Arrangements’ parent company will start selling hemp drinks and edibles and using its franchise network to deliver orders.
    The 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp, which is legally defined as a plant that contains 0.3% or less tetrahydrocannabinol, better known as THC.
    Edibles.com is also planning to open brick-and-mortar locations.

    The homepage for Edibles.com, the hemp marketplace from the parent company of Edible Arrangements
    Source: Edible Brands

    The parent company of Edible Arrangements is moving into a different kind of edible.
    Edible Brands is launching Edibles.com, an e-commerce marketplace for hemp products, like Cann drinks and Wana gummies.

    The 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp, which is legally defined as a plant that contains 0.3% or less tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the primary intoxicant in cannabis. The federal law paved the way for companies to sell products with THC derived from hemp rather than marijuana across most states, even if those areas haven’t legalized marijuana.
    A handful of states, like Connecticut, have placed restrictions on how much THC a hemp product can contain. But in much of the country, hemp legalization has led to a veritable Wild West.
    “There’s a lot of demand for hemp products out there right now, but what people are looking for is that safe and trusted place to buy it,” Edible Brands CEO Somia Farid Silber told CNBC.
    The website launches on Friday, starting with Texas. The company is planning to roll out the platform nationwide quickly, with Florida, Georgia and other Southeastern markets following soon after Texas.
    Edibles.com also has a lease for a brick-and-mortar location in Inman Park in Atlanta and plans to add physical locations in other states, as well.

    “This is a defining moment for the hemp industry,” Cann CEO and co-founder Jake Bullock said in a statement. “A trusted, high-quality marketplace like Edibles.com has the power to reshape the future of THC products and drive the long-term industry growth we’ve all been working toward.”
    As a private company, Edible Brands does not have to disclose its quarterly financial results. The business, best known for its fruit baskets inspired by floral bouquets, had nearly 800 locations as of the end of 2023.
    While cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, 24 states have legalized it for recreational use. Legal retail sales were projected to surpass $32 billion in 2024, with roughly 14% — or $4.5 billion — coming from edibles, according to a study from cannabis-focused software company Leaflink.

    Growing a new business

    The idea to sell edibles has been percolating “for a while,” according to Silber.
    A year ago, the company acquired the edibles.com domain name after settling a years-long lawsuit against World Media Group for “cybersquatting,” or registering a well-known domain name in the hopes of reselling it for a profit.
    By July, Edible Brands hired cannabis executive Thomas Winstanley as executive vice president of Edibles.com. And in October, Silber took the reins as CEO after eight years at the company.
    “We positioned it as a way to be able to create that connection for people who may be looking for permission to try these things, who’ve been hearing about them,” Winstanley said. “But it’s different when you walk in and see these products at a gas station, instead of seeing a collection of the nation’s leading products.”
    For one, the dosage of Edibles.com’s offerings hover around five milligrams per serving, according to Winstanley. The dose is considered on the low end; Colorado, for example, caps edible cannabis products at 10 milligrams of THC per serving
    Plus, when selecting its suppliers, the company stuck with companies that are well known in the hemp and cannabis industries in order to increase trust in the platform. Brands sold on Edibles.com include Cantrip, 1906, Cann and Wana.
    Those suppliers went through a tough compliance audit and questioning to make sure their production and sourcing were above board, Winstanley said.
    And it isn’t just suppliers who have to worry about compliance.
    Edibles.com will fulfill its online orders using its existing franchise system. The Edible Arrangements franchisees who participate will allow the nascent business to offer same-day or next-day delivery, just like it does with its fruit baskets or chocolate-dipped strawberries.
    “With our franchise network that we have today, we can cover 70% of households in the U.S. within an hour,” Silber said.
    Edibles.com has done “extensive” compliance and background checks to make sure that the operators involved understand the requirements of delivering its edibles, according to Winstanley.
    Select products will also be available for nationwide shipping even before Edibles.com expands to other markets.
    Ahead of the official launch, Edible Brands is already looking to the future, with bold expansion plans.
    Its future slate could include making its own edibles.
    “That’s another extension that we’re actively working on in real time,” Winstanley said.
    Less likely is a collaboration between Edibles.com and its sister company. However, Silber said that the initial marketing will play into long-running questions from Edible Arrangements customers about why the company doesn’t sell the other kind of edibles. More

  • in

    Even the Trumpiest stocks are suffering

    What are the Trumpiest firms? One way to answer the question is by looking at companies in the president’s orbit, such as Tesla, owned by Elon Musk, his billionaire adviser, or the eponymous Trump Media & Technology Group. Another way is to look at firms that saw their prices surge the day after Donald Trump’s election victory, when the biggest gainers included Palantir, a defence contractor; Apollo Global Management and Capital One, two financial giants; and yes, Tesla. More

  • in

    Fed holds interest rates steady, still sees two cuts coming this year

    The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee kept its key borrowing rate targeted in a range between 4.25%-4.5%, where it has been since December.
    The FOMC downgraded its collective outlook for economic growth and gave a bump higher to its inflation projection.
    Officials now see the economy accelerating at just a 1.7% pace this year, down 0.4 percentage point from the last projection in December.
    In addition to the rate decision, the Fed announced a further scaling back of its “quantitative tightening” program in which it is slowly reducing the bonds it holds on its balance sheet.

    WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve in a closely watched decision Wednesday held the line on benchmark interest rates though still indicated that reductions are likely later in the year.
    Faced with pressing concerns over the impact tariffs will have on a slowing economy, the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee kept its key borrowing rate targeted in a range between 4.25%-4.5%, where it has been since December. Markets had been pricing in virtually zero chance of a move at this week’s two-day policy meeting.

    Along with the decision, officials updated their rate and economic projections for this year and through 2027 and altered the pace at which they are reducing bond holdings.

    Despite the uncertain impact of President Donald Trump’s tariffs as well as an ambitious fiscal policy of tax breaks and deregulation, officials said they still see another half percentage point of rate cuts through 2025. The Fed prefers to move in quarter percentage point increments, so that would mean two reductions this year.
    Investors took encouragement that further cuts could be ahead, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising more than 400 points following the decision. However, in a news conference, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the central bank would be comfortable keeping interest rates elevated if conditions warranted it.
    “If the economy remains strong, and inflation does not continue to move sustainably toward 2%, we can maintain policy restraint for longer,” he said. “If the labor market were to weaken unexpectedly, or inflation were to fall more quickly than anticipated, we can ease policy accordingly.”

    Uncertainty has increased

    In its post-meeting statement, the FOMC noted an elevated level of ambiguity surrounding the current climate.

    “Uncertainty around the economic outlook has increased,” the document stated. “The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate.”
    The Fed is charged with the twin goals of maintaining full employment and low prices.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell delivers remarks at a news conference following a Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting at the Federal Reserve on March 19, 2025 in Washington, DC.
    Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

    At the news conference, Powell noted that there had been a “moderation in consumer spending” and it anticipates that tariffs could put upward pressure on prices. These trends may have contributed to the committee’s more cautious economic outlook.
    The group downgraded its collective outlook for economic growth and gave a bump higher to its inflation projection. Officials now see the economy accelerating at just a 1.7% pace this year, down 0.4 percentage point from the last projection in December. On inflation, core prices are expected to grow at a 2.8% annual pace, up 0.3 percentage point from the previous estimate.
    According to the “dot plot” of officials’ rate expectations, the view is turning somewhat more hawkish on rates from December. At the previous meeting, just one participant saw no rate changes in 2025, compared with four now.
    The grid showed rate expectations unchanged over December for future years, with the equivalent of two cuts expected in 2026 and one more in 2027 before the fed funds rate settles in at a longer-run level around 3%.

    Scaling back ‘quantitative tightening’

    In addition to the rate decision, the Fed announced a further scaling back of its “quantitative tightening” program in which it is slowly reducing the bonds it holds on its balance sheet.
    The central bank now will allow just $5 billion in maturing proceeds from Treasurys to roll off each month, down from $25 billion. However, it left a $35 billion cap on mortgage-backed securities unchanged, a level it has rarely hit since starting the process.
    Fed Governor Christopher Waller was the lone dissenting vote for the Fed’s move. However, the statement noted that Waller favored holding rates steady but wanted to see the QT program go on as before.
    “The Fed indirectly cut rates today by taking action to reduce the pace of runoff of its Treasury holdings,” Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group, said. “The Fed has multiple things to consider in the balance of risks, and this move was one of the easiest choices. This paves the way for the Fed to eliminate runoff by summer, and, with any luck, inflation data will be in place where reducing the Federal Funds rate will be the obvious choice.”
    The Fed’s actions follow a hectic beginning to Trump’s second term in office. The Republican has rattled financial markets with tariffs implemented thus far on steel, aluminum and an assortment of other goods against U.S. global trading partners.
    In addition, the administration is threatening another round of even more aggressive duties following a review that is scheduled for release April 2.
    An uncertain air over what is to come has dimmed the confidence of consumers, who in recent surveys have jacked up inflation expectations because of the tariffs. Retail spending increased in February, albeit less than expected though underlying indicators showed that consumers are still weathering the stormy political climate.
    Stocks have been fragile since Trump assumed office, with major averages dipping in and out of correction territory as administration officials cautioned about an economic reset away from government-fueled stimulus and toward a more private sector-oriented approach.
    Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan earlier Wednesday countered much of the gloomy talk recently around Wall Street. The head of the second-largest U.S. bank by assets said card data shows spending is continuing at a solid pace, with BofA’s economists expecting the economy to grow around 2% this year.
    However, some cracks have been showing in the labor market. Nonfarm payrolls grew at a slower-than-expected pace in February and a broad measure of unemployment that includes discouraged and underemployed workers jumped a half percentage point during the month to its highest level since October 2021.
    “Today’s Fed moves echo the kind of uncertainty Wall Street is feeling,” said David Russell, global head of market strategy at TradeStation. “Their expectations are a little stagflationary because GDP estimates came down as inflation inched higher, but none of it is very decisive.”
    —CNBC’s Sarah Min contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Boeing shares jump after CFO gives upbeat outlook, says cash burn is easing

    Boeing’s cash burn is easing this quarter, CFO Brian West told an investor conference.
    The company had a string of losses after two fatal crashes and other safety and quality crises.
    Boeing’s CFO brushed off immediate concerns about tariffs, but said any impact depends on how long the uncertainty lasts.

    Boeing workers are pictured exiting a gate below an image of a Boeing 737-800 aircraft as Boeing’s 737 factory teams hold the first day of a “Quality Stand Down” for the 737 program in Renton, Washington on January 25, 2024. 
    Jason Redmond | AFP | Getty Images

    Boeing’s cash burn is easing this quarter and its factories are improving to deliver more planes this year, the aerospace giant’s finance chief said Wednesday, as the company works to turn a corner on several manufacturing and safety crises.
    Boeing shares ended the day nearly 7% higher after CFO Brian West’s upbeat comments, leading the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 higher.

    “We think we’re off to a good start for the year,” West said at a Bank of America investor conference. He said cash burn improvement could be in the “hundreds of millions” of dollars.
    Boeing went through about $14 billion last year, including more than $4 billion in the last three months of 2024, when it struggled through a nearly two-month labor strike at its largest factories and faced other production problems. Boeing last posted an annual profit in 2018.

    Read more CNBC airline news

    West said the massive fire at a Pennsylvania aviation fastener factory in February won’t have a near-term production impact or affect Boeing’s goal to get monthly output to 38 737 Max aircraft a month and seven 787 Dreamliners because of its elevated inventory.
    The FAA last year barred Boeing from ramping production up beyond 38 Max planes a month following the January 2024 midair blow out of a door plug on a passenger jet. New Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the cap remains in place, following a visit to Boeing’s 737 Max factory in Renton, Washington, last week.
    Boeing is still working up to its capped production rate.
    West also brushed off immediate concerns about President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs, but said any impact depends on how long the uncertainty lasts.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    NBA may bring back iconic highlight show ‘NBA Inside Stuff’

    The NBA has filed two trademark applications related to the iconic show ‘NBA Inside Stuff.”
    NBC Sports is considering bringing back a refreshed version of the show when it regains media rights for the league next year, according to a person familiar with the matter.
    The fan favorite show first launched in 1990.

    Ahmad Rashad and Willow Bay look on during an Inside Stuff Episode taping circa 1993 in Secaucus, New Jersey.
    Nathaniel S. Butler | National Basketball Association | Getty Images

    The NBA is quietly preparing to bring back its iconic show “NBA Inside Stuff.”
    On Monday, the league filed two trademark applications for “NBA Inside Stuff,” the name of the long-running NBA highlight show that has aired on three different networks during its history — most notably from 1990 to 2006 on NBC and ABC. The show was briefly resurrected from 2013 to 2016 on NBA TV.

    NBC is considering bringing back a “refreshed version” of the program, according to a person familiar with the matter. NBC will once again air live NBA games next season after losing the broadcast rights in 2002.
    No decision has been made on whether to renew the show, the people said. An NBC spokesman declined to comment.
    The NBA did not immediately respond to a request to comment. However, a source close to the league said the filing is part of the NBA’s routine trademark process.
    The league previously owned multiple “NBA Inside Stuff” trademark registrations, but let them lapse, likely because it was no longer using the trademark.

    ‘Weddnesssssday!’

    “NBA Inside Stuff” was initially hosted by sportscaster Ahmad Rashad, who aimed to popularize and humanize NBA players with behind-the-scenes access. The show’s “Rewind” segment, featuring game highlights and Rashad yelling out days of the week, became a staple of the show.

    The league’s two trademark filings indicate the league aims to use the “NBA Inside Stuff” name for a television show and to produce branded merchandise.
    Josh Gerben, a trademark attorney at Gerben IP, said television doesn’t necessarily mean linear TV. It could be in the form of a YouTube or TikTok show.
    “This is great intellectual property for the league,” Gerben said. “I think it makes a lot of business sense right now.”
    The league would likely try to license the IP to one of its media partners, Gerben said.
    In July, the NBA signed a 11-year, $76 billion media rights deal with The Walt Disney Company, NBCUniversal and Amazon that kicks off next season.
    NBC may be trying to tap into nostalgia from its past run showing NBA games. In November, composer Josh Tesh revealed on CNBC that he’s working with NBC to bring back his famous “Roundball Rock” song.
    Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of CNBC. More

  • in

    Auto suppliers face more dire circumstances than automakers amid Trump tariffs

    Automotive suppliers face bigger repercussions from Trump’s proposed tariffs than automakers, but their problems could quickly have ripple effects on the broader industry.
    Most vehicles produced in North America meet requirements for free trade under the USMCA deal, but far fewer individual supplier parts meet those standards.
    Products that comply with USMCA, which most notably includes rules about where a part or material can be produced, are currently able to avoid 25% North American tariffs until expanded levies are set to take effect April 2.

    US President Donald Trump arrives to speak about the United States – Mexico – Canada agreement, known as USMCA, during a visit to Dana Incorporated, an auto supplier manufacturer, in Warren, Michigan, January 30, 2020.
    Saul Loeb | Afp | Getty Images

    DETROIT — President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada would hit automotive suppliers harder than automakers, but their problems could quickly have ripple effects on the broader industry. 
    Most vehicles produced in North America meet the requirements for free trade under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, but far fewer individual parts meet the stringent standards under the 2020 North American trade deal that was negotiated by Trump, according to federal trade reporting data.

    USMCA compliance is important for automakers and suppliers. Products that meet the standards, which most notably include rules about where a part or material can be produced, are currently able to avoid 25% North American tariffs until the expanded levies are set to take effect April 2.
    Companies are lobbying the Trump administration to continue allowing parts and vehicles that meet USMCA regulations to remain tariff-free.
     Such tariffs are added challenges for a less robust post-Covid automotive supply chain that continues to face high interest rates, labor shortages and lower profits. There are far more suppliers than automakers, many of which may only produce a few parts that could cause production disruptions if they are forced to close due to higher costs.
    Shares of many larger publicly traded suppliers, such as American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Magna International and Adient, are down double digits this year amid the tariffs. Others such as Aptiv and Lear Corp. are roughly flat.

    Stock chart icon

    Supplier stocks

    “There’s clearly not the profitability in the supply chain to absorb the tariffs,” Collin Shaw, president of the MEMA Original Equipment Suppliers association, told CNBC. “Suppliers are more at risk, seeing that a lower percentage of suppliers aren’t USMCA compliant.”

    USMCA standards

    Roughly 63% of motor vehicle parts imported from Mexico into the United States in 2024 were complaint with USMCA standards. That compares with 92.1% of motor vehicles.
    For Canada, 74.6% of motor vehicle parts and 96.9% of vehicles were imported tariff-free under USMCA in 2024. That includes 170 Canadian parts suppliers that operate facilities in 26 states, according to the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association in Canada.
    The vehicle and parts compliancy comes from publicly available trade data from the U.S. International Trade Commission based on the value of the imported goods for consumptiom. A small minority of the non-compliant goods that didn’t claim a trade program such as USMCA may have been imported tariff-free if they were being sold to the government or for other reasons. 
    To be USMCA compliant, 75% of vehicle content must be sourced from the U.S., Canada or Mexico, with additional requirements, such as that 40% of core parts and 70% of steel and aluminum must be sourced regionally.
    “I think that if we get auto tariffs that shut down the industry, many interests in our business are going to end up in court looking for an emergency state,” said Flavio Volpe, an advocate for Canada’s auto industry who leads the APMA. “Everybody’s nervous.”
    Shaw, whose organization represents more than 800 auto suppliers in North America, said the supply chain is “resilient” but there’s also a “fragility” that makes major shifts in policy difficult to address quickly.
    “What I’d say is very difficult, is the whipsaw back and forth,” Shaw said. “The notion that we can very easily bring these things back — it can be done. It takes time though.”

    A production worker inspects parts for any quality issues at auto supplier Aludyne in Port Huron, Michigan, U.S., October 7, 2020.
    Alydyne | Rachael Waynick | Reuters

    In general, Shaw said it can take years to move a plant and build a new one. Permitting for a new plant can take six to 12 months. It can take another 12 months to 18 months, if not more, to build the facility, followed by another year or more in tooling and ramping up production.
    The parts that are produced for a vehicle impact whether an entire car or truck is compliant, but many major parts such as engines and transmissions are assembled locally, assisting compliancy for the finished product. The same cannot be said for parts such as wire harnesses, batteries and other smaller components.
    For example, BMW said its vehicles being produced in Mexico are not USMCA compliant, largely because the engines for the vehicles are imported from Europe. Engines and transmissions tend to cross borders less often than a part that would go into one of those main components.
    “This a complicated agreement,” said Kristin Dziczek, automotive policy advisor for the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, during its annual auto conference last month in Detroit. “So there are different categories here of components and parts and vehicles and different thresholds of what they had to phase up to for having USMCA sourcing in order to get a zero tariff for trade within the U.S.”
    Since Trump’s USMCA went into effect and replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement in 2020, compliancy for both motor vehicles and parts from Mexico has notably declined, meaning more tariffs are likely being paid. Duty-free vehicles are down from 99.7% in 2019 to 92.1% in 2024, while vehicle parts are down from about 75% in 2019 to 62.5% in 2024.
     Canada’s free trade-compliant motor vehicle parts have decreased from 83.1% in 2019 to about 75% in 2024. Tariff-free vehicle imports from Canada are slightly down from 98.8% in 2019 to about 97% last year.

    ‘Industry issue’

    Auto suppliers have been adamant that they will not or cannot taken on the 25% increased costs on non-compliant USMCA parts — tariffs that could be in addition to levies on steel and aluminum and other materials.
    Swamy Kotagiri is CEO of Canada-based Magna, a major global supplier for automakers that also does some contract manufacturing for automakers. He described the proposed tariffs as being “absolutely disruptive to the industry.”
    “This is the industry issue. I believe very strongly that it cannot be addressed by any one constituent,” Kotagiri, an auto industry veteran, told CNBC during an interview last month. “Given the magnitude that is being discussed and talked about, it absolutely not possible for the suppliers to take on this.”

    A survey earlier this month of 139 suppliers conducted by MEMA found the majorities of parts makers were affected by the steel and aluminum tariffs, with 97% expressing concerns about tariff-induced financial distress at smaller, “subtier” suppliers.
    Such suppliers typically make smaller parts but can easily cause disruptions in the supply chain if their production is impacted. The importance of such suppliers was prominent during the coronavirus pandemic, when global supply chains were routinely being upended due to parts disruptions.
    Executives with France-based auto supplier Forvia earlier this month said the company and its customers, including automakers, have been planning different contingency plans for the tariffs.
    “The whole supply chain cannot swallow 25%,” Forvia CEO Martin Fischer said during a media event. “Cars will get more expensive for consumers if tariffs continue for a long time. The industry cannot ship at losses and swallow 25%.” More