More stories

  • in

    Trump’s new tariffs are set to be his most extreme ever

    HE HAS ACTUALLY gone and done it. President Donald Trump had long threatened to impose hefty tariffs on Canada and Mexico, America’s two biggest trading partners. Last month, when they were first due to take effect, he offered both countries a last-minute reprieve. Now he is in no mood to play nice. As we published this, new tariffs were set to come into effect at 12:01am EST on March 4th. America will hit imports from its two neighbours with levies of 25%. For good measure, Mr Trump will also add another 10% tariff on Chinese goods, on top of the 10% charge he implemented last month, which itself added to tariffs imposed in his first term. More

  • in

    Trump’s new tariffs are his most extreme ever

    HE HAS ACTUALLY gone and done it. President Donald Trump had long threatened to impose hefty tariffs on Canada and Mexico, America’s two biggest trading partners. Last month, when they were first due to take effect, he offered both countries a last-minute reprieve. This time, he was in no mood to play nice. New tariffs came into effect at 12:01am EST on March 4th, when America hit imports from its two neighbours with levies of 25%. For good measure, Mr Trump added another 10% tariff on Chinese goods, on top of the 10% charge he implemented last month, which itself added to tariffs imposed in his first term. More

  • in

    Inflation will move toward 2% target, but risks to outlook are rising, says Fed’s Musalem

    During a keynote address at the National Association for Business Economics conference, Musalem noted that his baseline case is for inflation to gradually move toward the central bank’s 2% target. 
    However, “near-term inflation expectations have risen substantially over the last few weeks, and that’s something I’m watching closely,” Musalem added.

    Alberto Musalem, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, speaks to the Economic Club of New York, in New York City, U.S., Feb. 20, 2025.
    Brendan McDermid | Reuters

    WASHINGTON — The risks for higher inflation are on the rise, St. Louis Federal Reserve President Alberto Musalem said Monday.
    During a keynote address at the National Association for Business Economics conference, Musalem noted that his baseline case is for inflation to gradually move toward the central bank’s 2% target. This scenario requires inflation expectations to remain anchored and stable, he noted.

    However, “near-term inflation expectations have risen substantially over the last few weeks, and that’s something I’m watching closely,” Musalem added.
    Indeed, the February reading on The Conference Board’s consumer confidence index reflected the largest one-month drop since August 2021, as inflation expectations rise. The Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing PMI also showed a sharp increase in prices within the sector for the month.
    “Businesses and households are clearly more sensitive to expectations of higher inflation,” Musalem said. “That’s why the risks seem more skewed to the upside, but the baseline is for continued disinflation.”
    Investors came into 2025 expecting the Fed to lower rates this year. However, the central bank kept rates at their current 4.25%-4.5% range after its January meeting, where it noted that inflation remained “somewhat elevated.”
    The CME Group’s FedWatch tool also shows that traders are pricing in a 93% likelihood that the Fed will keep rates at their current levels at the central bank’s March meeting.
    Musalem’s remarks come as investors brace for U.S. tariffs on imports from China, Mexico and Canada — with many worried the levies will drive prices higher, thus making it harder for the Fed to ease rates going forward.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Serena Williams joins WNBA ownership group in Toronto

    Serena Williams, the former top tennis player in the world, has joined the ownership group of the Toronto Tempo.
    Williams will help the Canada-based WNBA team with its visual identity.
    The tennis legend also has ownership stakes across the National Women’s Soccer League, the National Football League and TGL Golf.

    Serena Williams, one of sport’s greatest champions, joins Canada’s first WNBA team as a managing partner.
    CNW Group | Toronto Tempo

    Tennis superstar Serena Williams is continuing her investment in women’s sports with a new ownership stake in the Women’s National Basketball Association’s Toronto Tempo, the team announced Monday.
    The Tempo, the WNBA’s first expansion team in Canada, will begin play in the 2026 season and is also owned by Larry Tanenbaum, chairman of Kilmer Sports Ventures.

    “I have always said that women’s sports are an incredible investment opportunity. I am excited to partner with Larry and all of Canada in creating this new WNBA franchise and legacy,” Williams said in a statement.
    The size of Williams’ stake was not disclosed.
    As part of Williams’ role with the team, she will play an active role in the team’s visual look from jersey designs to merchandise collaborations.
    “Serena is a champion,” said Teresa Resch, president of the Tempo Basketball Club. “She’s the greatest athlete of all time, and her impact on this team and this country is going to be incredible.”
    The deal is pending final approval from the league.

    Since retiring from tennis in August 2022, Williams, the former No. 1 tennis player with 23 Grand Slam singles championships, has been busy building her off-court portfolio.
    She is also a minority owner in the National Women’s Soccer League’s Angel City FC, the National Football League’s Miami Dolphins and TGL’s Los Angeles Golf Club. More

  • in

    From Ireland’s Primark to Spain’s Mango, foreign retailers are planting their flags in more U.S. malls and cities

    Ireland’s Primark, Spain-based Mango, Canadian retailer Aritzia and Japan-based Uniqlo are adding new stores across the U.S.
    International retailers are drawn to the U.S. because of its fragmented market of apparel retailers and more resilient consumer, said Monique Pollard, a London-based retail analyst for Citi.
    Social media has also made it easier for new brands to break in, even with a smaller footprint of stores.

    ELMHURST, NY — One of the newest additions to Queens Center is a store that many local mallgoers may not recognize.
    Along with well-known mall staples like Macy’s, American Eagle and Bath & Body Works, the shopping center is now home to a Primark. The Ireland-based discount retailer, which sells clothing, shoes, purses and more, opened its doors there in December — and it has more U.S. stores on the way.

    Across the country, a growing number of malls and shopping centers are getting a dose of international influence. Retailers including Primark, Spain-based Mango, Canadian retailer Aritzia and Japan-based Uniqlo are adding new stores across the U.S. — and pushing into regions where they haven’t gone before, outside of coastal cities like New York City or Los Angeles.

    Primark store at the Queens Center mall in Elmhurst, NY. 
    Melissa Repko | CNBC

    Nearly 19,000 stores opened in the U.S. between 2018 and 2023 and about 28% of those were foreign-owned retailers, according to the most recent available figures from GlobalData, a market research firm.
    And in the past few years, retailers based in Europe or elsewhere around the world have announced ambitious U.S. expansion plans.
    Primark, which has 29 stores in the U.S., plans to reach 60 locations in the country by the end of next year. It has signed leases for new stores in diverse parts of the U.S., including El Paso, Texas; Memphis, Tennessee; Hyattsville, Maryland; and Miami, Florida.
    The retailer, known as Penneys in Ireland, has become a household name in Ireland, the U.K. and other parts of Europe since its first store opened in Dublin in 1969. The U.S. market has become an important place to break new ground as the company hits a “maturity point” in some European countries, president of Primark U.S. Kevin Tulip said in an interview with CNBC.

    “The U.S. is the number one consumer market,” he said. “So to be here and to get it right means a lot. But you really need to get it right.”

    Why the U.S. is a retail expansion target

    Primark isn’t the only one with big ambitions for the U.S.
    Barcelona-based retailer Mango announced a $70 million expansion last fall, including plans for 42 new storefronts in the U.S. in 2024, 20 more locations this year and a new logistics center outside of Los Angeles. Those locations will be scattered in parts of the Sun Belt and Northeast, Mango CEO Toni Ruiz told CNBC in an interview. 
    Vancouver-based Aritzia’s U.S. footprint is now nearly as large as its fleet of stores in its home country. Last year, the retailer opened 14 new stores, including three expansions or relocations, in North America. That brought its store count to 61 in the U.S., as it added boutiques in major cities like Chicago and Miami and smaller markets like Plano, Texas and Sacramento, California.

    Shoppers wait in line to enter newly opened women’s clothing store Aritzia on Michigan Avenue on Black Friday on Nov. 29, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois.
    Kamil Krzaczynski | Getty Images

    And more stores are coming this year in cities including Scottsdale, Arizona and Murray, Utah, the company said.
    The U.S. has many ingredients that brands from Europe and other parts of the world look for, said Monique Pollard, a London-based retail analyst for Citi. The U.S. has a fragmented market of apparel retailers, and its consumer spending has proven more resilient than in some other inflation-weary markets like the United Kingdom, she said.
    Plus, fashion trends are going global more quickly as influencers on Instagram and TikTok and consumers’ own travel influences what they wear. That can make it easier for a new brand to break into an unfamiliar region, said John Mercer, head of global research for Coresight Research.
    “There are fewer differences to kind of iron out between markets,” he said, adding that foreign brands now “stand a better chance” than in previous years or decades.
    Social media has made it possible for brands with even a tiny footprint of physical stores to gain traction in the U.S. About 63% of consumers under 25 and 57% of those between 25 and 34 discover products or brands on social media at least weekly, according to a retail survey by research advisory group Forrester.

    Shoppers walk into Uniqlo at the Westfield UTC shopping center on Jan. 31, 2025 in San Diego, California.
    Kevin Carter | Getty Images

    Viral trends have fueled sales for some of the international newcomers, through products like Aritzia’s Super Puff winter coat and Uniqlo’s shoulder bag. Both companies credited social media for driving popularity of those items two years ago.
    Shrinking department stores and retail bankruptcies have left market share for foreign retailers to grab — and some empty stores in malls for them to fill. Macy’s is in the middle of closing about 150 of its namesake locations across the U.S. Many specialty baby stores have also shuttered due to bankruptcies, including Buy Buy Baby, which was owned by Bed Bath & Beyond, and Babies R Us.
    Primark’s Tulip said children’s clothing has been one of company’s strong categories in the U.S., saying the company has noticed higher demand and less competition.
    And some of its stores have replaced retailers like J.C. Penney that have shuttered some locations, or others such as Bed Bath & Beyond that have gone out of business.
    Mango, Aritzia, Uniqlo and Zara are all in the early innings of U.S. growth, though, with less than 100 stores each across the country. That means that at least for now, the U.S. businesses account for just a small piece of those companies’ global business and a tiny fraction of the country’s apparel market.
    The U.S. represents about 5% of global sales for Primark. Tulip said he expects that percentage to grow and already, that growth has begun to influence the retailer’s product range. One change is that it’s now making more leisurewear to suit American shoppers’ tastes, he said.

    Mango flagship store on Fifth Avenue in New York City.
    Courtesy: Mango

    The risks of expansion

    Yet in any new market, success isn’t a guarantee — and relevance can fade.
    Sweden-based H&M paved the way for other foreign retailers when it opened the doors of its first U.S. store about 25 years ago on New York City’s Fifth Avenue. Since then, the retailer has become a well-known mall name strongly associated with its fast fashion approach of quickly responding to trends and selling cheaper versions of hot items.
    But more recently, the Swedish retailer’s sales have disappointed as it faces stiffer competition in the U.S. and abroad from low-priced Chinese online retailer Shein and Spanish rival Zara, which is owned by Inditex.

    A shopper carries Foot Locker and Zara shopping bags while walking down the Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica, California, March 20, 2023.
    Patrick T. Fallon | Afp | Getty Images

    Uniqlo owner Fast Retailing has gained traction in the U.S. after earlier pushes into the country fell flat. The Japanese retailer reported losses of roughly $71.5 million in fiscal 2016 from retiring assets and shuttering stores in the U.S.
    Now, the company is back in growth mode and has pledged to reach 200 stores in North America by 2027.
    For Primark, the U.S. has come with a learning curve, too, Tulip said. The retailer broke into the U.S. market in 2015 by opening a store in Boston, a city with a large Irish population that would recognize its brand. Then, he said, it moved cautiously to try to understand the U.S. shopper before opening more locations in the Northeast and then heading further to Southern states.
    At many of Primark’s store openings, enthusiastic shoppers have turned up early and waited in a line before doors swung open, he said.
    Yet the Irish retailer has had missteps too, he said. Primark carries a lot of licensed merchandise, such as Disney and Marvel-themed clothing or jackets and T-shirts with the logos of popular NBA and NFL teams.
    But when it expanded to the U.S., that sports merchandise didn’t land in the way it had hoped.
    “Initially we thought, you know, surely everyone in Europe loves the Dallas Cowboys and, you know, let’s land that product into every [U.S.] store and everyone’s going to absolutely go wild for it,” he said. “But we saw pretty quickly that actually people are very passionate about their local sports team.”
    He said Primark pivoted to carrying only relevant local sports teams, such as having Buffalo Bills items in upstate New York.
    Primark also has a unique quirk that could become a weakness: It sells exclusively through brick-and-mortar stores. Its lack of an e-commerce business in the U.S. could make it vulnerable to retailers like Amazon, Walmart and Shein, especially since those sites sell many low-priced wardrobe staples.
    More than 50% of Primark’s clothes are everyday basics, such as underwear, T-shirts and socks, according to the company’s website.
    As the newcomers have tried to gain traction with American shoppers, some brands have taken a different tack. Zara’s net store count in the U.S. has stayed flat at just shy of 100 for the past five years. 
    Instead of more locations, Zara’s parent company has added more room in its stores. In 2013, the average store size for Inditex’s retailers including Zara was around 6,000 square feet. That’s shot up to an average of about 8,600 square feet a decade later, according to a Citi analysis based on data from company filings.

    While the growing international retailers have only a small footprint in the U.S., they have already proven influential, as they offer shoppers fresh choices and U.S. retailers new competition.
    One of Primark’s next expansion moves show the company is not subtle about its ambitions: a store is set to open in New York City’s Herald Square. It will be a less than two-block walk from Macy’s iconic flagship store.
    On a recent day at Queens Center a few miles away, prospective customers browsed the aisles of the Primark store, and some left with an armful of purchases.
    Jeanette Torres, a retiree who lives in Brooklyn, heard about the brand from her son. She said the company’s low prices convinced her to shop there. She purchased a T-shirt, underwear and winter hat, which cost a total of about $30.
    She said she likes that those prices don’t come at the expense of the store experience. Primark has brighter lights and neater locations than off-price retailers like Burlington Stores, where she said “everything is on top of everything.”
    Bruce Wolinsky, another retiree from Queens, made his first trip to Primark by accident. He went to the mall with his Macy’s credit card, a 25% off coupon and a need for a new pair of shoes.
    He never made it to the department store. Instead, he walked into Primark and walked out with a $22 pair of lace-up navy blue and brown sneakers.
    — CNBC’s Gabrielle Fonrouge contributed to this report. More

  • in

    ‘Reverse Robin Hood scam’ or windfall for middle class? Lawmakers debate Trump tax plan extensions

    Republicans and Democrats are making competing claims about the impact of extending provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
    The GOP sees it as a windfall for low- and middle-income households. Democrats view it as a handout for the wealthiest Americans.
    Both sides can be correct depending on the frame of reference, tax experts said.

    Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) leaves after the House passed Republicans’ budget resolution on the spending bill on Feb. 25, 2025 in Washington.
    Kayla Bartkowski | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    As Congress debates how to handle trillions of dollars in expiring tax breaks, lawmakers on both sides have been lobbing claims about which consumers will see the biggest benefits from extending them. Economists and tax experts say the answer isn’t so straightforward.
    In short: Who benefits depends on your frame of reference.

    House Republicans passed a budget plan Tuesday that lays the groundwork to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a package of tax cuts enacted in 2017 during President Trump’s first term.
    Many of the cuts for individual taxpayers will expire after 2025 unless Congress acts — and the GOP can do this with a simple majority vote in Congress by using a special legislative maneuver called budget reconciliation.
    Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., ranking member of the House Ways and Means tax committee, said Wednesday that Republicans’ policy plan — central to which is an extension of the Trump tax cuts, estimated to cost more than $4 trillion — amounts to a “reverse Robin Hood scam” that gives to the rich and takes from the poor.

    Meanwhile, Republicans say low- and middle-income households stand to win under the plan.
    “Extending the Trump tax cuts delivers the biggest relief to working-class Americans and small businesses in a generation,” Rep. Jason Smith, R-Missouri, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, said Tuesday.

    Experts say both sides’ arguments have merit.
    “The interesting thing is both can be true, depending on how you interpret what they’re saying,” said James Hines, a law and economics professor at the University of Michigan and research director in its Office of Tax Policy Research.

    The Trump law cut taxes for most people

    President Trump speaks about the passage of tax reform legislation on the South Lawn of the White House on Dec. 20, 2017.
    Saul Loeb | Afp | Getty Images

    The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act lowered taxes for most U.S. households, experts said.
    The legislation was broad, benefiting Americans across the income spectrum — which is broadly consistent with Republicans’ claims, they said.
    Changes like a larger child tax credit and an expanded standard deduction cut income taxes for many low and middle earners, while lower marginal tax rates and tax deductions for business owners largely helped the wealthy, experts said.
    If TCJA provisions are extended, 62% of tax filers would see lower tax bills in 2026, compared to if the measures expire, according to the Tax Foundation. (Put another way, many people’s tax bills would increase next year without an extension.)
    More from Personal Finance:Trump, DOGE job cuts may be biggest in historyFunding freeze stymies Biden-era consumer energy rebatesTrump, Musk float idea of $5,000 ‘DOGE dividend’ checks
    With those provisions in place, Americans would get a 2.9% boost in income after taxes in 2026, on average, according to the Tax Foundation. Income would rise by 3.4% if factoring in broader impacts of the tax cut on the U.S. economy, it said.
    A U.S. Treasury Department report issued in the waning days of the Biden administration had a similar finding: The average person would get a 2.2% tax cut by extending the Trump law. (Its estimate is for the 2025 budget year.)
    All income groups would get a boost in after-tax income, Treasury said.

    The rich are the ‘biggest winners’

    U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) and Rep. Katherine Clark (D-MA), delivers remarks after the House passed Republicans’ budget resolution on the spending bill on Feb. 25, 2025.
    Kayla Bartkowski | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    However, with an extension, the largest tax cuts would accrue to the highest-income families, Treasury said.
    Household in the top 5% — who earn over $450,000 a year, roughly — are the “biggest winners,” according to a July 2024 analysis by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. They’d get over 45% of the benefits of extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, it said.
    A Penn Wharton Budget Model analysis on the impacts of the broad Republican tax plan had a similar finding.
    The bottom 80% of income earners would get 29% of the total value of proposed tax cuts in 2026, according to the Wharton analysis, issued Thursday. The top 10% would get 56% of the value, it said.

    This dynamic speaks to Democrats’ arguments, especially when coupled with possible spending cuts for programs like Medicaid and food stamps. Such programs largely benefit lower earners.
    Wharton estimates that the combination of tax cuts and spending reductions for programs like Medicaid and food stamps would leave “low-income households worse off,” even after accounting for economic growth.
    Some tax analysts view after-tax income as among the best frames of reference to assess policy impact, because it estimates how much a household’s buying power improves. Others disagree, however, saying it’s hard to control for other economic variables that might alter income.

    The top 1% of households (who make about $1 million or more a year) would get a 3.2% boost in after-tax income in 2027 via an extension of the Trump law, the Tax Policy Center said. In dollar terms, their tax savings would be about $70,000, on average.
    By comparison, middle-income households, would get a 1.3% income boost, or a $1,000 tax cut, according to the Tax Policy Center.

    The rich ‘pay most of the taxes’

    In a sense, this dynamic is to be expected because the U.S. income-tax system is progressive, experts said. That means high earners generally shoulder more of the overall tax burden than low earners.
    “If you ask, ‘Who gets the dollars,’ it’s mostly rich taxpayers,” said Hines of the University of Michigan. “But that’s because it’s a tax cut and they pay most of the taxes.”
    The top 1% paid 40% of all U.S. income taxes collected in 2022, according to a recent Tax Foundation analysis. The bottom 90% paid about a quarter — 28% — of total income tax.
    “Democrats say most of the tax dollars went to the rich: They’re absolutely correct,” Hines said.
    However, the TCJA cut taxes more for working families than rich families on a proportional basis, a White House spokesperson said.
    Experts agreed with that assessment.
    “Republicans say, ‘But the cuts were not slanted to the rich compared to how much people were paying originally,” which is also generally correct, Hines said.

    President Donald Trump holds up a copy of legislation he signed before before signing the tax reform bill into law in the Oval Office Dec. 22, 2017.
    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    For example, the bottom 50% of Americans saw their average federal tax rate fall by 15% from 2017 to 2018, after the Trump tax cut took effect, according to the Tax Foundation. (Their rate fell to 3.4% from 4%.)
    By contrast, the top 1% saw their average rate decline by a lesser percentage (about 5%) during that period, to 25.4% from 26.8%.
    “The reason why the debate is so fractured is there are elements of truth to both sides,” said Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation. “It’s a battle of metrics, and what weight to place on each of them.” More

  • in

    Domino’s Pizza finally launches stuffed crust to keep customers away from rivals

    Thirty years after Pizza Hut introduced stuffed crust, Domino’s Pizza is introducing its own take on the now-classic menu item.
    Domino’s worked on its own version for three years to make sure it got the item right.
    Ahead of the launch of Parmesan Stuffed Crust, the pizza chain spent 12 weeks training franchisees and 7,000 stores on how to make it properly.

    Domino’s Parmesan Stuffed Crust.
    Source: Domino’s Pizza

    Domino’s Pizza is finally releasing its own version of stuffed crust on Monday, aiming to win over the customers who are willing to spend more on the pricey pizza customization.  
    Thirty years ago, Yum Brands’ Pizza Hut debuted the cheesy stuffed crust, marketing the launch with a television commercial starring Donald Trump. As years passed, rivals Papa John’s and Little Caesars eventually followed with their own takes. Trump went from hawking pizza to sitting in the Oval Office.

    Generations of consumers have grown up with stuffed crust, including the increasingly important Gen Z diners, who are entering the workforce and buying their own pizzas now. The addition is critical for Domino’s, the top U.S. pizza chain, to compete with rivals Pizza Hut and Papa John’s, which have ceded market share to Domino’s in recent quarters but still steal the pizza chain’s customers.
    “Nearly 13 million Domino’s customers each year are buying stuffed crust from our competitors, and these are our customers who have to leave our brand because we’re the only national pizza brand that doesn’t offer it,” Domino’s Chief Marketing Officer Kate Trumbull told CNBC.
    Domino’s has taken so long to release stuffed crust that a survey of its customers found that 73% already believed that the chain offered it on the menu, according to Trumbull.
    That all changes on Monday, when Domino’s launches its Parmesan Stuffed Crust. The menu item is included in the pizza chain’s $9.99 carryout deal.
    When Pizza Hut originally launched stuffed crust, Domino’s viewed the menu item as gimmicky, according to Trumbull. Plus, the company heard that stuffed crust caused bottlenecks and slowed down service, leading to unhappy customers and workers.

    But Domino’s perspective changed after more national competitors followed Pizza Hut’s lead. The chain committed to launching its own version in 2022, when its sales were faltering in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic pizza boom.
    “It has been one of the longest development efforts in the company’s history,” Trumbull said.
    The process began with extensive market research. Findings included that stuffed crust customers tend to buy pizza more frequently and often spend more per transaction.
    Eight potential iterations followed before Domino’s landed on the right recipe for its Parmesan Stuffed Crust, made with mozzarella and topped with garlic seasoning and a sprinkle of Parmesan cheese.
    At the same time, Domino’s was improving its restaurants’ overall operations, retraining its employees across the system on making its crust and rolling out a custom dough spinner to restaurants. If the pizza chain hadn’t made its kitchens more efficient, it wouldn’t have been able to launch stuffed crust, according to Trumbull.
    Ahead of the launch of Parmesan Stuffed Crust, the pizza chain spent 12 weeks training franchisees and 7,000 stores on how to make it properly.
    “We’re not going to leave anything to chance after taking three years,” Trumbull said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Warren Buffett calls Trump’s tariffs a tax on goods, says ‘the Tooth Fairy doesn’t pay ’em’

    Warren Buffett at a press conference during the Berkshire Hathaway Shareholders Meeting on April 30, 2022.

    Legendary investor Warren Buffett made a rare comment on President Donald Trump’s tariffs, saying punitive duties could trigger inflation and hurt consumers.
    “Tariffs are actually, we’ve had a lot of experience with them. They’re an act of war, to some degree,” said Buffett, whose conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway has large businesses in insurance, railroad, manufacturing, energy and retail. He made the remarks in an interview with CBS News’ Norah O’Donnell for a new documentary on the late publisher of the Washington Post, Katharine Graham. 

    “Over time, they are a tax on goods. I mean, the Tooth Fairy doesn’t pay ’em!” Buffett said with a laughter. “And then what? You always have to ask that question in economics. You always say, ‘And then what?'”
    This marks the first public remark from the 94-year-old “Oracle of Omaha” on Trump’s trade policies. Last week, Trump announced that the sweeping 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada will go into effect March 4 and that China will be charged an additional 10% tariff on the same date. China has vowed to retaliate.
    During Trump’s first term, the Berkshire chair and CEO opined at length in 2018 and 2019 about the trade conflicts that erupted, warning that the Republican’s aggressive moves could cause negative consequences globally.
    When asked about the current state of the economy by CBS, Buffett refrained from commenting on it directly.
    “Well, I think that’s the most interesting subject in the world, but I won’t talk, I can’t talk about it, though. I really can’t,” Buffett said.

    Buffett has been in a defensive mode over the past year as he rapidly dumped stocks and raised a record amount of cash. Some read Buffett’s conservative moves as a bearish call on the market and the economy, while others believe he’s preparing the conglomerate for his successor by paring outsized positions and building up cash.
    Market volatility has ramped up as of late as concerns grew about a slowing economy, unpredictable policy changes from Trump as well as overall stock valuations. The S&P 500 is up just about 1% this year. More