More stories

  • in

    Boeing CEO Calhoun took home $5 million last year, compensation package hit by Max crisis

    Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun said he would step down by the end of the year amid Boeing’s 737 Max safety crisis.
    Boeing said Calhoun’s total compensation for 2023 was $32.8 million, up from $22.6 billion.
    The company said it will tie more executive compensation to safety goals going forward.

    Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., before meeting with a group of senators on Jan. 24, 2024.
    Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images

    Outgoing Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun’s take-home pay fell to $5 million last year after declining a bonus, compared with $7 million in 2022, and his latest compensation package is taking a hit from the prolonged safety crisis surrounding the company’s bestselling jetliner, the 737 Max.
    Calhoun’s total compensation last year rose 45% to $32.8 million, up from $22.6 million in the prior year. But Boeing said the 2023 sum is closer to $23.5 million, as it includes long-term incentives such as stock. Shares of the plane-maker are down almost 30% this year.

    Total compensation for Stan Deal, whom Boeing last month replaced at the top of the commercial airplanes division, rose 42% to $12.5 million.
    Calhoun last month said he would step down by the end of the year. His departure is part of a broad shake-up in which the company also replaced its chairman and head of its commercial airplane unit. The manufacturer is grappling with the fallout of a door plug panel that blew out midair from a 737 Max operated by Alaska Airlines in January.
    Boeing disclosed the take-home pay, which did not include a 2023 bonus Calhoun declined that was valued at $2.8 million, and executive compensation in a filing Friday. The company said it will now more closely tie executive compensation to safety goals.
    “I promise that I personally, and we as a Board, will leave no stone unturned in our efforts to get this company where it needs to be,” newly named Boeing Chairman Steve Mollenkopf said in a message to shareholders in a filing Friday.
    The Jan. 5 accident has slowed deliveries of new jets and Boeing has said it will burn more cash than it previously expected. The company is scheduled to release first-quarter results April 24.

    Calhoun took the helm at Boeing in January 2020 after his predecessor was ousted for his handling of the aftermath of two fatal crashes of the 737 Max. In addition to the Covid-19 pandemic’s devastating effect on the aviation industry, Boeing has also had a host of quality defects on its aircraft. Those have slowed deliveries of new planes to customers clamoring for fresh jets as travel snapped back, hurting Boeing’s cash flow.
    The Alaska Airlines door plug near-catastrophe was the most serious issue since the crashes. The Justice Department is investigating the Alaska Airlines accident and the Federal Aviation Administration has capped Boeing’s 737 Max production until it signs off on Boeing’s quality control.
    Boeing said on Friday that “operational performance metrics for all business units will be focused exclusively on quality and safety goals” this year and that long-term executive incentives could be reduced to zero if goals are not met.
    Boeing last posted an annual profit in 2018.
    Clarification: CEO Dave Calhoun’s total 2023 compensation is closer to $23.5 million. An earlier version contained a figure that was later updated by Boeing.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    ‘Mandalorian & Grogu,’ ‘Toy Story 5,’ and another ‘Tron’ coming to theaters from Disney

    The Walt Disney Company has updated its theatrical slate.
    Disney revealed that one of its 2026 Star Wars films would be “The Mandalorian & Grogu,” featuring the iconic duo from its Disney+ series “The Mandalorian,” slated for theatrical release on May 22, 2026.
    A fifth “Toy Story” film is set to hit theaters on June 19, 2026, and “Tron: Ares” is scheduled for Oct. 10, 2025.

    The Mandalorian and the Child (Grogu) on Disney+’s “The Mandalorian.”

    The Walt Disney Company on Friday revealed its new theatrical schedule, which will feature a film about the Mandalorian and Grogu, a fifth “Toy Story” film, and another “Tron” flick before the end of 2026.
    The company’s theatrical business has struggled in the wake of pandemic shutdowns and dual Hollywood labor strikes, as productions stalled and moviegoers’ box-office habits shifted. All the while, Disney struggled to connect with audiences, which further exacerbated revenue woes.

    Since returning to the helm at Disney in late 2022, CEO Bob Iger has been working to right the ship. He’s admitted that the quality of its films suffered in its bid to pump out a high quantity of entertainment content.He said brands such as Marvel, in particular, needed to be more selective about which sequels get made.
    Iger also said he would no longer tolerate his company’s partners and creative team prioritizing messaging over storytelling.
    Disney’s updated slate features several iconic franchises, as well as some releases for adult audiences.
    Notably, the company’s “Moana” sequel has been pushed to July 2026. It was originally slated to open in 2025.
    “The Amateur,” a 20th Century Production starring Oscar winner Rami Malek, moved to April 2025 from its previous November 2024 date. And “Nightbitch,” a Searchlight feature with Amy Adams attached, will release in December 2024.

    Disney teased that one of its 2026 Star Wars films would feature the iconic duo from its Disney+ series “The Mandalorian” and revealed its title will be “The Mandalorian & Grogu.” It is slated for theatrical release on May 22, 2026.
    A fifth “Toy Story” film is set to hit theaters on June 19, 2026, and “Tron: Ares” is slated for Oct. 10, 2025. More

  • in

    Fed Governor Bowman says additional rate hike could be needed if inflation stays high

    US Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman attends a “Fed Listens” event at the Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington, DC, on October 4, 2019. 
    Eric Baradat | AFP | Getty Images

    Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman said Friday that it’s possible interest rates may have to move higher to control inflation, rather than the cuts her fellow officials have indicated are likely and that the market is expecting.
    Noting a number of potential upside risks to inflation, Bowman said policymakers need to be careful not to ease policy too quickly.

    “While it is not my baseline outlook, I continue to see the risk that at a future meeting we may need to increase the policy rate further should progress on inflation stall or even reverse,” she said in prepared remarks for a speech to a group of Fed watchers in New York. “Reducing our policy rate too soon or too quickly could result in a rebound in inflation, requiring further future policy rate increases to return inflation to 2 percent over the longer run.”
    As a member of the Board of Governors, Bowman is a permanent voting member of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. Since taking office in late 2018, her public speeches have put her on the more hawkish side of the FOMC, meaning she favors a more aggressive posture toward containing inflation.
    Bowman said her most likely outcome remains that “it will eventually become appropriate to lower” rates, though she noted that “we are still not yet at the point” of cutting as “I continue to see a number of upside risks to inflation.”
    The speech, to the Shadow Open Market Committee, comes with markets on edge about the near-term future of Fed policy. Statements this week from multiple officials, including Chair Jerome Powell, have indicated a cautious approach to cutting rates. Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, an FOMC voter, told CNBC he likely sees just one reduction this year, and Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari indicated no cuts could happen if inflation does not decelerate further.
    Futures traders are pricing in three cuts this year, though it has become a close call between June and July for when they start. FOMC members in March also penciled in three cuts this year, though one unidentified official in the “dot plot” indicated no decreases until 2026 and there was considerable dispersion otherwise about how aggressively the central bank would move.

    “Given the risks and uncertainties regarding my economic outlook, I will continue to watch the data closely as I assess the appropriate path of monetary policy, and I will remain cautious in my approach to considering future changes in the stance of policy,” Bowman said.
    Weighing inflation risks, she said that supply-side improvements that helped bring numbers down this year may not have the same impact going forward. Moreover, she cited geopolitical risks and fiscal stimulus as other upside hazards, along with stubbornly higher housing prices and labor market tightness.
    “Inflation readings over the past two months suggest progress may be uneven or slower going forward, especially for core services,” Bowman said.
    Fed officials will get their next look at inflation data Wednesday, when the Labor Department releases the March consumer price index report.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Skydance’s unique offer for Paramount Global would give it a large stake while keeping the company public

    Skydance Media, RedBird Capital and KKR want to take a significant minority or slight majority stake in a publicly traded Paramount Global, sources told CNBC.
    The consortium has entered exclusive talks with Paramount Global to try to reach a deal.
    Skydance CEO David Ellison and RedBird’s Jeff Shell, the former CEO of NBCUniversal, would both have leadership roles in a new company if a deal is approved, sources told CNBC.

    Skydance Media’s offer to acquire National Amusements and merge its studio with Paramount Pictures isn’t a conventional takeover. The question for Paramount Global shareholders might be: Is it better than no deal at all?
    Skydance has made a unique pitch to Paramount Global’s special committee, in charge of accepting or rejecting transactions, and its investors, according to four people familiar with the parameters of the offer. Paramount Global would continue to trade publicly. Skydance would own either a substantial minority stake or a majority stake in Paramount Global by merging its assets and raising new equity, which it would acquire along with its private equity partners RedBird Capital Partners and KKR.

    The consortium’s ownership percentage in the new company could be around 45% or just over 50%, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions are private. No details have been nailed down and are all still subject to change, the people said.
    Spokespeople for Paramount Global and Skydance declined to comment.
    The new equity will be dilutive for existing shareholders. But it will align voting and economic control in a way that hasn’t been the case with the Redstone family, which currently directly or indirectly owns 77% of the Class A voting stock of Paramount Global and 5.2% of the Class B common stock, about 10% of the overall equity of the company.
    While Skydance CEO David Ellison is primarily in charge of orchestrating the deal, his father, Oracle co-founder and Chairman Larry Ellison, would be putting up some of the new funding, said the people. He would also potentially provide Paramount Global with access to artificial intelligence software and other data technology from Oracle.
    Paramount Global has many valuable legacy media assets, including CBS, the Paramount Pictures studio and its physical lot, a studio library with films such as “The Godfather,” “Titanic,” and “Forrest Gump” and cable networks such as Comedy Central and Nickelodeon. It also owns its subscription streaming service Paramount+, with more than 67.5 million subscribers, and its free advertising supported service Pluto TV, with more than 80 million monthly active users.

    Still, it’s struggled to grow in recent years. Paramount Global’s annual revenue for 2023 was $29.7 billion, a 1.7% decline from 2022. Paramount+ continues to lose money. Paramount Global’s debt rating was cut to junk by S&P Global Ratings last month because the company’s broadcast and cable TV business is declining as traditional pay TV subscribers cancel.
    Paramount Global has a market capitalization of about $7.6 billion and had $14.6 billion in long-term debt at the end of 2023. When CBS and Viacom merged in 2019, the combined market value of the company was about $30 billion.
    Shares were trading about 5% lower Friday.

    The Skydance plan

    In the past decade, Oracle successfully transformed from a legacy enterprise technology company to a cloud services and AI-focused business. That provides a similar thematic blueprint for what the Ellisons would like to do with Paramount Global – a legacy media company that needs to lean into the future to justify its existence.
    David Ellison would likely lead the new company.
    Former NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell, in his capacity as chairman for sports and media at RedBird, is also expected to have a major leadership role. Management would be open to divestitures that current CEO Bob Bakish has examined but ultimately rejected, such as selling BET Media Group and Showtime, the people said.
    New leadership would also assess more existential questions to Paramount Global, such as the future of Paramount+ and what the company’s role should be in a broader media ecosystem. No decisions have been made yet about these larger strategies, the people said.

    Better than nothing

    The transaction as proposed isn’t a full takeover of Paramount Global. That’s what Paramount Global’s board would prefer, but Ellison has balked, the people said.
    Still, the message to investors will be that the combination of David Ellison, his dad’s involvement, Shell, Skydance’s assets and its commitment to new media (including Skydance’s video game development studio) is simply better for future growth than Redstone and Bakish.
    The Paramount Global special committee will need to decide if Skydance’s complicated transaction is better than the status quo — and also better than any other offer that may still come. The two sides have entered exclusive talks to do deeper due diligence and potentially reach a deal in the coming month or two, the people said.
    There still could be other avenues to pursue. Private equity firm Apollo Global Management lobbed in a recent bid of $26 billion for the entire company, The Wall Street Journal reported this week. But the Paramount Global special committee has chosen to move forward with the Skydance talks in exclusivity. Redstone has unofficially sought a buyer for Paramount Global for years, according to people familiar with the matter. The late offer by Apollo may be an attempt to keep the private equity firm around the hoop in case the Skydance transaction falls through.
    Warner Bros. Discovery held preliminary discussions with Paramount Global but stopped working on a deal earlier this year, CNBC reported in February.
    WATCH: Faber report: Paramount Global deal moves to fast lane

    Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of CNBC. More

  • in

    Spire Global bets on AI to help improve weather forecasts, with boost from Nvidia

    Spire Global — which offers information on weather, climate, and ship and aircraft movements, as well as has a space services business — is hoping weather forecasting can become even more more accurate.
    CEO Peter Platzer said the radio frequency sensing company sees a huge potential for such improvements.
    He also said a new partnership with Nvidia will inspire “more valuable products and new use cases.”

    Spire Global at the New York Stock Exchange, August 17, 2021.
    Source: NYSE

    Artificial intelligence has been instrumental to weather forecast modeling for years, and recent breakthroughs in generative AI dangle the possibility of it becoming more accurate.
    That’s what Spire Global is betting on in its recently announced partnership with AI darling Nvidia.

    “What deep learning and neural networks and generative AI have done is they have shifted the power from those who have access to supercomputers a bit more to those who have access to super data,” Peter Platzer, CEO and co-founder of Spire Global, told CNBC’s Morgan Brennan in an interview on CNBC’s “Manifest Space” podcast. 
    “Because the supercomputer side with a model has been replaced with hyper efficient GPUs [graphics processing units], you can run something that used to take eight hours, and you can now run it in eight seconds,” he explained. “For us, that has been always a vision that we knew eventually was going to come, so when this [Nvidia] partnership became possible, we jumped on that.”
    Twelve-year old Spire Global is in the radio frequency sensing business, operating a satellite constellation that collects space-based radio frequency data that can be analyzed and sold as a service. It offers information on weather, climate, and ship and aircraft movements, as well as has a space services business.
    The opportunity in weather forecasting, though, is huge: A third of the global economy — roughly $30 trillion worth of global GDP — ranging from trade to agriculture to power generation is subject to weather, according to Platzer.
    He estimates there are some 175 major use cases across up to 200,000 customers or customer types globally when it comes to weather forecasting. In other words, the need for more accurate forecasts, particularly with more lead time, is in high demand.

    Follow and listen to CNBC’s “Manifest Space” podcast, hosted by Morgan Brennan, wherever you get your podcasts.

    So what does this collaboration with Nvidia entail?
    “It allows us access to their infrastructure to serve our customers better, with more valuable products and new use cases … and them access to our data to improve their modeling, their machinery,” Platzer said.
    Nonetheless, “at this point in time there is no immediate economic flow from Nvidia to Spire or vice versa,” he noted.
    As has been the case with a growing list of companies working with the semiconductor stalwart, investors reacted favorably to the news, which was disclosed at Nvidia’s GTC developer conference in March.
    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang unveiled a “digital twin” of Earth called Earth-2 onstage that essentially pairs the open cloud platform with Nvidia’s generative AI model CorrDiff and Spire’s satellite data to improve existing weather and climate prediction models.
    Spire Global, a small capitalization stock that went public through a SPAC merger in 2021, shot up roughly 40% in response.
    Spire then raised $30 million through a direct offering of common stock to two institutional investors — an offering that closed last week.
    “We had a number of investors competing to get in on the Spire story,” Platzer said. “For us, it means that we can deliver the balance sheet, we can lower our cost of capital, we can create more flexibility … we’re going to have fewer debt payments, which increases our free cash flow and that helps us on that path to free cash flow profitability.”
    Spire Global forecasts achieving positive free cash flow this summer, or by the third quarter of 2024.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Hyundai’s Genesis brand is a dark horse in U.S. luxury vehicle market

    Hyundai’s Genesis launched in the U.S. nearly eight years ago to much skepticism but the South Korean luxury brand has proven itself worthy in the domestic market.
    Sales have grown exponentially and executives expect double-digit growth annually for at least the next five years.
    For the short term, Genesis is expected to grow awareness and sales with new “Magma” performance models and potentially an upcoming new three-row SUV.

    Michael Wayland / CNBC

    NEW YORK — When Hyundai Motor launched its Genesis luxury brand domestically in 2016, many were skeptical the South Korean automaker — recognized mainly for budget vehicles at the time — knew what it was doing.
    Among the skeptics were auto industry veterans Randy Parker and Claudia Marquez. Both were working for Nissan’s luxury Infiniti brand at the time and they’ve since made the leap over to Hyundai Group, with Parker leading the Hyundai brand in the U.S.

    “We both were looking at it like, ‘Oh, my God, how are these guys going to be able to make it?’ I mean, nothing against. It’s just complicated. A new brand in such a competitive set,” Marquez, who now leads Genesis in North America, told CNBC last week at the New York International Auto Show.
    Not only has Genesis made it, the brand has thrived to become a dark horse in the U.S. luxury market with unique styling, unexpected comfort and well-ranked quality. It’s done so with both gas-powered and electric vehicles.

    Patricia Wayne, first all-electric GV60 customer and Claudia Marquez (right), chief operating officer, Genesis Motor North America, at Genesis Santa Monica, Santa Monica, Calif., May 26, 2022.

    The brand has overtaken the decades-old Infiniti brand in annual U.S. sales since 2022. Executives expect to continue annual double-digit growth over the next five years, according to Marquez, who was named Genesis’ North American chief operating officer in October 2021.
    “We have to outpace, by far, the luxury market,” she said. “It’s going to continue being strong. It has to be a marathon, not a sprint.”
    Genesis started as a vehicle in Hyundai’s lineup but the company announced in late 2015 that it would become its own brand. Since then, its U.S. sales have grown from fewer than 7,000 vehicles in 2016 to more than 69,000 last year.

    Growing awareness

    Along those lines, Marquez and José Muñoz, Hyundai president and global chief operating officer, noted that while robust Genesis’ growth is expected, it will be at a restricted pace to retain the residual values and pricing of the vehicles.
    Muñoz said expectations for the brand are “still high” but its volume ambitions for the U.S. are more in line with its rivals such as Porsche than that of Lexus and Mercedes-Benz, which sell hundreds of thousands of vehicles annually.  

    Hyundai CEO Jae Hoon Chang (left) and José Muñoz, Hyundai president and global chief operating officer, attend the 2024 New York International Auto Show
    Michael Wayland | CNBC

    “We still have a long ways to go, but this is not a mass brand. So, we don’t have a huge volume aspirations, but there’s still a significant way to go,” Muñoz, who also serves as CEO of Hyundai Motor and Genesis Motor North America, said during a separate interview at the show.
    The brand’s closest competitors based on 2023 sales were Land Rover (71,727 units), Porsche (75,415 units), Lincoln (81,818) and Volvo (128,350). Genesis sales last year increased about 23% over the prior year to 69,175 vehicles.
    One of Genesis’ greatest challenges remains awareness, Marquez said. Stephanie Brinley, principal automotive analyst at S&P Global Mobility, agreed with that perception.
    “It’s an upstart that’s gained credibility; now it has to gain a wider audience,” Brinley said. “It is respected at this point. The problem is, just not quite enough people know about it yet. … That’s the space it occupies right now.”

    Michael Wayland / CNBC

    Performance models

    For the short term, Genesis is looking to grow awareness and sales with new “Magma” performance models. It intends to offer a performance variant for each production vehicle, the company said last week in conjunction with the auto show in New York.
    The brand also may expand its lineup with a three-row SUV. Genesis revealed a large, all-electric concept SUV last week. Marquez declined to discuss potential production plans but said to expect such a vehicle “sooner rather than later.”
    Genesis currently offers three sedans (G70, G80, G90) and three SUVs (GV60, GV70, GV80). The G80, GV60 and GV70 are also available as all-electric vehicles. Genesis’ 2024 starting prices range from about $41,500 for the G70 to more than $89,000 for the G90.

    GV60 Magma Concept 

    Worldwide, the Genesis G80 is the best-selling model in the brand’s vehicle lineup since its introduction in 2016, with 390,738 units sold across the global market, including electrified G80 models. 
    The brand is likely to get a boost in local manufacturing with a new $7.6 billion factory expected to begin production later this year in Georgia.
    Muñoz said Genesis will be a “key focus of the plant,” which also will produce Hyundai and Kia vehicles. The brand currently assembles the GV70 gas and electric SUVs at a plant in Alabama, while the other models are imported from South Korea.
    “The products are very strong. They’re very welcomed by the consumer as we have focused on [the U.S.],” Muñoz said. “This is the most important market for a Genesis without a doubt.”

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Free trade flaws fueled Trump’s rise in 2016 — and the problems remain, top economist says

    Trump has proposed a baseline 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and a levy of 60% or higher on imported Chinese products.
    Speaking to CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick on the sidelines of the Ambrosetti Forum on Friday, Koo said protectionism was a “horrible thing,” but that Trump’s approach “does have some economic logic.”

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks after attending a wake for New York City Police Department (NYPD) officer Jonathan Diller, who was shot and killed while making a routine traffic stop on March 25 in the Far Rockaway section of Queens, in Massapequa Park, New York, U.S., March 28, 2024. 
    Shannon Stapleton | Reuters

    Decades of trade deficits and a strong dollar created too many “losers” in the U.S. economy who turned to Donald Trump’s protectionist policies, according to Richard Koo, chief economist at the Nomura Research Institute — and those conditions remain.
    Trump’s “America First” economic policies led his administration to institute a slew of trade tariffs on China, Mexico, the European Union and others, including slapping 25% duties on imported steel and aluminum.

    As the Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election, Trump has proposed a baseline 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and a minimum levy of 60% on imported Chinese products.
    These policies have drawn widespread criticism from economists, who argue that tariffs are counterproductive, as they make imported goods more expensive for the average American.
    Speaking to CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick on the sidelines of the Ambrosetti Forum on Friday, Koo said protectionism was a “horrible thing,” but that Trump’s approach “does have some economic logic.”
    “When we studied economics and free trade, in particular, we were taught…that free trade always creates both winners and losers in the same economy, but the gain that winners get is always greater than the loss of the losers, so the society as a whole always gains. So that’s why the free trade is good,” he noted.
    Koo nevertheless argued that this rests on the assumption that trade flows are balanced or in surplus, while the U.S. has been running huge deficits for the last forty years, which have expanded the number of “losers.”

    “By 2016, the number of people who consider themselves losers of free trade, were large enough to elect Trump president, and so we have to really go back and say to ourselves: what did we do wrong to allow this many people in United States to view themselves as losers of free trade?” he said.
    For Koo, the key problem was the exchange rate, as the strength of the U.S. dollar incentivized foreign imports and hurt U.S. companies exporting around the world.
    “We kind of let the exchange rate be decided by so-called market forces, speculators, my clients, Wall Street types, but the foreign exchange rate has to be set in a way that the number of losers does not grow to a point where the free trade itself is lost,” Koo said.
    He pointed to a similar pivotal moment in 1985, when President Ronald Reagan faced the same issue of a strong dollar and rising protectionism. At the time, Reagan responded by facilitating the Plaza Accord with France, West Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom to depreciate the U.S. dollar against the respective currencies of these countries through intervention in the foreign exchange market.

    “That’s the kind of thing we should have been more conscious of doing. Instead of allowing [the] dollar to go wherever the market takes [it], and then these people who are not as fortunate as we are in the financial markets, end up suffering and end up voting for Mr. Trump,” Koo added.
    He argued that economists need to move beyond the idea that the trade deficit is simply down to “too much investment” and “too few savings” in the U.S., as this means deficit can only be reduced by remaining in recession until domestic demand weakens so much that U.S. companies can export more goods, which would not be possible in a democracy.
    Koo again pointed to past dealings with Japan, suggesting that if the argument held that overseas companies are just filling in where U.S. companies cannot satisfy domestic demand, then the American companies fighting Japanese firms in the 1970s and 70s should have recorded huge profits due to excess demand.
    “But that did not actually happen. It’s the opposite that happened. So many of them went bankrupt, so many losers of free trade were left in the streets, because it was not savings and investment issue, it was the exchange rate issue,” he said.
    “The dollar should have been much weaker, and Reagan understood that that’s why he took that action.”
    President Joe Biden’s administration has also broken from Washington’s decades-long spotlight on free trade deals and has retained any of the measures enacted under the Trump administration.
    However, rather than focus on imposing new tariffs, Biden has instead bet big on industrial policies such as the CHIPS and Science Act and the Inflation Reduction Act to bring manufacturers back to the United States, particularly in rapidly-growing sectors such as semiconductors and electric vehicles. More

  • in

    China’s Nio to expand battery swap services to gain an edge on EV infrastructure

    Since November, Nio has partnered with at least four Chinese automakers — Changan, Geely, Chery and JAC — for developing battery swap standards and expanding the network in China.
    Nio has installed more than 2,300 battery swap stations but said less than a fifth currently are breaking even.
    The company’s investment in battery swap stations is about two years ahead of market demand, CEO William Li said at an event last month here Nio announced a partnership with battery giant CATL.

    Pictured here is a Nio battery swapping station in Haikou, Hainan province, China, on May 9, 2023.
    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    BEIJING — Chinese electric car company Nio has been expanding its battery swap partnerships in a bid to gain an edge on the infrastructure side of the EV ecosystem.
    Since November, Nio has partnered with at least four Chinese automakers — Changan, Geely, Chery and JAC — for developing battery swap standards and expanding the network in China. Nio also announced agreements earlier this year to work with two local battery companies on battery swap services.

    All these efforts are aimed at alleviating consumers’ anxiety about driving range. While having a large network of battery charging stations helps address those concerns, battery swapping is a faster method as it takes only a few minutes.
    “Swapping right now is mainly driven by Nio. Of course, Nio found out this is an ecosystem,” CLSA’s deputy head of research Ding Luo said in an interview. “If only one player is trying to build up the whole ecosystem, it’s impossible for [them]. That’s why they’re thinking whether they can invite some partners.”
    Battery swapping still isn’t mainstream because the car batteries need to be standardized, he added.
    While a charging station resembles a typical gas station, battery-swap technology is housed in a shed-like structure. It uses machines to automatically exchange depleted batteries for pre-charged ones in compatible cars.
    Nio said in mid-March that it completed 40 million battery swaps compared with nearly 37 million charges at its public stations — Nio consumers can also access third-party charging stations, or install one at home.

    “I think our outlook is very simple,” Shen Fei, senior vice president of Nio’s power division, said in Chinese translated by CNBC. “The first thing is to serve Nio’s users, and then provide a good battery charging and swapping experience, make charging more convenient than refueling, and at the same time help the company sell more cars.”
    The company claims that with battery swap, drivers can get a fresh charge in three minutes, if they opt in for a paid battery service plan.
    Shen said more car models will be added to Nio’s battery swap network, while adding that swapping can allow drivers to keep abreast with improvements in battery technology. He did not specify which automakers will likely be added to its network.
    Power services and other products account for just about 10% of Nio’s total revenue. The company said that category of “other sales” for 2023 grew by 69% to 6.36 billion yuan ($895.9 million). Nio does not break out swap station revenue.

    Battery swap’s checkered past

    Battery swapping has been tried by the industry with mixed success, especially in the U.S.
    Tesla and a startup called Better Space tried out swapping more than 10 years ago, but the venture soon closed.
    In 2021, another startup, Ample, opened its battery swap stations in the San Francisco area — aimed at Uber drivers using the Nissan Leaf car.
    While it’s not clear how much headway Ample has made in the U.S., the company has since expanded its partnerships overseas. Last month the company announced it would serve corporate car fleets in Kyoto, Japan, while it teamed up with Stellantis to roll out battery swaps this year in Madrid, Spain.
    “For swapping to work it can’t be niche,” Tu Le, head of consultancy Sino Auto Insights, said. “Battery inventory investment is massive, so it needs to be amortized over lots of swapping.”
    But he was cautious on whether Nio could sell enough of its own premium-priced cars to make the economics work. “For now I still think the combination of swapping and charging makes for a pretty attractive feature set, but swapping alone likely doesn’t help them sell that many more cars.”
    “I think the nudge the Chinese government gave to encourage others to join forces with Nio on swapping could create the necessary pool of vehicles to make swapping viable,” he added.

    The business of charging

    Nio is the first major electric car company to roll out battery swap stations in addition to charging stations, alongside its own vehicles in mainland China and Europe.
    The company has installed more than 2,300 battery swap stations, and plans to install 1,000 more this year.
    Nio’s investment in battery swap stations is about two years ahead of market demand, CEO William Li said last month, adding that less than a fifth of battery swap stations that Nio operates are processing 60 orders a day, likely the minimum orders needed for a station to break even.
    Nio’s battery charging stations, on the other hand, reached profitability last year, according to the company. It plans to build 20,000 more this year.
    Passenger car battery swap stations can cost around $500,000 to build, while a relatively basic charging station with two ports costs around $200,000 to $300,000, according to Shay Natarajan, a North America-based partner at Mobility Impact Partners, a private equity fund that invests in transportation.
    CLSA’s Luo said businesses also prefer to invest in normal charging stations than swap stations because they make a higher return. But if businesses want to install faster-charging stations, he said they might face power grid challenges.
    CLSA’s analysis found that the power required for five superchargers in one location would be more than what 300 families would normally consume.
    Tesla is also collaborating with automakers in battery charging, with its over 50,000 superchargers worldwide that claim to restore about two-thirds of a battery’s charge in 15 minutes.
    In February, Ford reached a deal that allows its electric cars to use Tesla’s superchargers in North America. General Motors announced a similar agreement last year.

    Sustainability considerations

    The rapid development of electric cars, ostensibly aimed at reducing carbon emissions, also raises questions about battery waste.
    Nio pointed out that recent growth of new energy vehicles, which include hybrids, means nearly 20 million batteries will be reaching the end of their eight-year warranty period between 2025 and 2032.
    Last month, the company announced a partnership with battery giant Contemporary Amperex Technology to develop batteries with a longer lifespan, particularly for those used in swap stations.
    Nio claimed that by using battery swap and big data, it can retain 80% of a battery’s capacity after 12 years of use. Nio also said last month that CATL will develop batteries with longer lives for the company.
    — CNBC’s Lora Kolodny and Michael Wayland contributed to this report. More