More stories

  • in

    ESPN Bet plans launch in New York, the largest U.S. betting market

    ESPN Bet is planning to launch in New York.
    Penn Entertainment is buying Wynn Interactive’s mobile sports betting license in New York state for $25 million, after it was shut out of the licenses the state awarded in 2021.
    Penn’s newly rebranded sportsbook ESPN Bet has been making gains and taking market share in states where it operates.

    Courtesy: ESPN Bet

    ESPN Bet is coming to the Big Apple.
    Penn Entertainment, which operates the sports betting platform, will pay Wynn Resorts $25 million for market access, it said Tuesday. It’s the same amount Wynn paid New York state to operate there.

    Wynn Interactive, a subsidiary of Wynn Resorts, was awarded a New York mobile sports betting license in 2021. Penn was not — and it has missed out on the action from the nation’s largest sports betting market.
    In the two years since New York launched online sports betting, at least $35.7 billion has been wagered in the state. During every month but one during that period, it has had a higher betting handle than any other state.
    At the time the state awarded licenses, speculation was rampant that Penn lost out on one for its Barstool Sportsbook due to controversy surrounding Barstool founder Dave Portnoy. Neither the New York State Gaming Commission nor the company ever confirmed that.
    But last year, Penn sold Barstool back to Portnoy for $1, after paying $551 million.
    The transaction came as Penn made a $1.5 billion deal over 10 years, plus $500 million in stock warrants, to license one of the most recognizable brands in sports: ESPN.

    When ESPN Bet launched in mid-November, well after the start of the National Football League season, it was in some 17 states and had roughly 2% market share. But it saw a notable improvement almost right away. For instance, it grabbed 7.4% market share in Pennsylvania in November, up from 3.7% in October.
    FanDuel and DraftKings still occupy a near duopoly nationally, with BetMGM and Caesars taking up the third and fourth positions. But Eilers & Krejcik estimated ESPN Bet came away with 8% market share when it launched in November, good enough to take a third-place position.
    Bank of America analyst Shaun Kelley wrote in a note Friday that ESPN Bet could be a surprise beneficiary of Taylor Swift fans tuning into the NFL, and Sunday’s Super Bowl specifically, due to the singer’s relationship with Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce.
    Now, if New York gaming regulators sign off on the license transfer to Penn, ESPN Bet could provide new and potentially formidable competition in the nation’s biggest sports betting market.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Healthy Returns: Higher medical costs are pinching insurers

    JOIN US FOR HEALTHY RETURNS SUMMIT ON MARCH 29 2023. REGISTER BELOW

    A UnitedHealth Group health insurance card is seen in a wallet, Oct.14, 2019.
    Lucy Nicholson | Reuters

    Good afternoon! Health insurers are feeling the squeeze as older patients head to the doctor more than expected.
    CVS, which owns health insurer Aetna, on Wednesday slashed its full-year profit outlook, citing the potential for higher medical costs to bite into its profits. That warning came two weeks after insurance giant Humana cited the same factor as it issued a dismal 2024 earnings guidance.

    Medical costs from Medicare Advantage patients have spiked over the last year as more older adults return to hospitals to undergo procedures they had delayed during the Covid pandemic, such as joint and hip replacements. 
    Medicare Advantage, a type of privately run health insurance plan contracted by Medicare, has long been a key source of growth and profits for the insurance industry. More than half of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in such plans, enticed by lower monthly premiums and extra benefits not covered by traditional Medicare, according to health policy research firm KFF. 
    But investors have become more concerned about the runaway costs, which insurance companies say may not come down anytime soon. Other companies in the Medicare Advantage space are UnitedHealth Group and Elevance Health.
    CVS executives said on an earnings call Wednesday that the company’s insurance division saw slightly higher rates of outpatient care, including hip and knee surgeries, in the fourth quarter. They also saw more use of supplemental benefits such as dental and vision care, and “some pressure” from RSV vaccinations.
    The executives said inpatient care, or formal hospital admissions, was in line with the company’s expectations for the period. 

    The insurance segment’s medical benefit ratio — a measure of total medical expenses paid relative to premiums collected — increased to 88.5% for the fourth quarter from 85.8% during the year-ago period. A lower ratio typically indicates that the company collected more in premiums than it paid out in benefits, resulting in higher profitability.
    Last month, Humana said it saw an even bigger jump in medical costs in the fourth quarter. The company said the increase came partly from higher outpatient activity, but the company largely blamed it on an unexpected increase in inpatient care in November and December. 
    That pushed its medical benefit ratio in its insurance segment to a whopping 91.4% for the quarter, up from 87.4% for the same period a year ago. 
    Higher medical costs may be a larger problem for Humana than they are for CVS and other insurers. That’s because Humana is more dependent on its Medicare Advantage business than its rivals, as it accounts for more than 80% of its earnings, UBS analysts said in a Jan. 25 note.
    They added that there is no other part of Humana’s business that could meaningfully dampen the hit from higher medical costs on the insurance side. Humana has a specialty pharmacy segment called CenterWell, but it only brought in roughly a fifth of the revenue that the company’s insurance division booked for the fourth quarter. 
    Meanwhile, CVS has a retail pharmacy business and a health services segment, both of which posted stronger-than-expected revenue for the quarter.
    Another insurance giant that has been seeing higher medical costs, UnitedHealth Group, also has large health-care services and pharmacy operations that diversify its earnings streams. 
    The bigger question for all three companies is how exactly a new policy called the “two-midnight rule” will impact their insurance businesses. 
    Starting this year, Medicare Advantage plans have to cover their members’ hospitalizations at the higher inpatient rate if their doctors predict they’ll have to stay beyond two midnights. That policy has applied to traditional Medicare plans for nearly a decade. 

    The latest in health-care technology

    A sign is posted in front of the 23andMe headquarters on February 01, 2024 in Sunnyvale, California. 
    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    Trouble at 23andMe 
     It’s been a rough few months for 23andMe. 
    The genetic testing company, which rose to prominence with its at-home DNA testing kits, reported rocky fiscal third-quarter results last week. 23andMe posted revenue of $45 million for the quarter, which is down from the $67 million it reported in the same period last year. 
    During the company’s quarterly call with investors, co-founder and CEO Anne Wojcicki said 23andMe is considering splitting up its consumer and therapeutics businesses to help boost its stock price, which has been trading under $1.  
    The company received a deficiency letter from the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department in November, giving the company 180 days to bring its share price back above $1. If 23andMe fails to clear the threshold, it will be delisted from the exchange.
    “We have not made any definitive decisions about what we are going to do,” Wojcicki said during the call. 
    23andMe is also contending with mounting legal troubles as it faces more than 30 class-action lawsuits following a data breach it disclosed late last year that affected nearly 7 million people. The company has incurred $2.7 million in expenses related to the incident so far.
     For now, investors are watching to see how 23andMe navigates the challenging road ahead.
     Layoffs across Amazon Pharmacy, One Medical 
    Last week, Amazon cut a “few hundred roles” across its One Medical and Pharmacy units, the company confirmed to CNBC’s Annie Palmer. 
    In a memo to employees, Amazon Health Services lead Neil Lindsay said the company has “identified areas where we can reposition resources,” leading to the reductions.
    Amazon has pushed into the health-care industry in recent years as it works to build out its own medical ecosystem.
    In 2018, the company announced plans to buy the online pharmacy company PillPack, which would later help Amazon launch its own pharmacy. Four years later, Amazon shared that it would acquire the primary care provider One Medical for roughly $3.9 billion.
    But despite its lofty ambitions in health care, the segment is not exempt from CEO Andy Jassy’s aggressive cost cutting efforts. The company has announced job cuts within its Audible, Prime Video, Twitch, MGM Studios and Buy with Prime divisions in recent weeks, adding to the more than 27,000 layoffs the company began carrying out in late 2022. 
    You can read the full memo about the recent Amazon Pharmacy and One Medical layoffs here.
    Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at [email protected] and Ashley at [email protected] More

  • in

    Federal judge tosses lobbying group’s lawsuit challenging Medicare drug price negotiations

    A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by a major pharmaceutical industry lobbying group and two other organizations challenging Medicare drug price negotiations.
    The decision is an early win for the Biden administration as it grapples with a flurry of other legal challenges from drugmakers to the Inflation Reduction Act’s price talks.
    U.S. Judge David Ezra of the Western District of Texas sided with the Biden administration in dismissing the suit by PhRMA, the Global Colon Cancer Association and the National Infusion Center Association.

    Activists protest the price of prescription drug costs in front of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) building on October 06, 2022 in Washington, DC.
    Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

    A federal judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit brought by a major pharmaceutical industry lobbying group and two other organizations that challenged Medicare’s new powers to negotiate prices for costly prescription medicines. 
    The decision is an early win for the Biden administration as it grapples with a flurry of other legal challenges that drugmakers have filed against the Medicare drug price negotiations. The key policy under the Inflation Reduction Act aims to make medicines more affordable for seniors and could cut into pharmaceutical industry profits. 

    The judge’s ruling won’t end the legal battle over the policy, which could end up at the Supreme Court. Medicare issued its initial drug price offers to manufacturers for the first 10 medications subject to the talks earlier this month, with final negotiated prices going into effect in 2026.
    U.S. Judge David Ezra of the Western District of Texas sided with the Biden administration in dismissing the suit by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, the Global Colon Cancer Association and the National Infusion Center Association, which argued that the price talks were unconstitutional. 
    In a 14-page ruling, Ezra specifically dismissed the National Infusion Center Association, or NICA, from the case, arguing that the court does not have jurisdiction over the group’s legal challenge. He wrote that NICA’s claims fall under the Medicare Act and could only be heard by a court following an administrative review by the federal agency. 
    Ezra dismissed the rest of the case given that NICA is the only plaintiff based in the district. 
    PhRMA is “disappointed with the court’s decision, which does not address the merits of our lawsuit, and we are weighing our next legal steps,” spokesperson Nicole Longo told CNBC in a statement. PhRMA represents many of the largest drugmakers in the world, including Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson.

    But PhRMA and the two other organizations could appeal the decision. Legal experts say the pharmaceutical industry hopes to obtain conflicting rulings from federal appellate courts, which could fast-track the issue to the Supreme Court. 
    A slate of major companies with drugs selected for negotiations, including J&J, Merck, and Bristol Myers Squibb, have filed separate lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the price talks. Those cases are still pending.
    Notably, a federal judge in Ohio issued a ruling in September denying a preliminary injunction sought by the Chamber of Commerce, one of the largest lobbying groups in the country, which aimed to block the price talks before Oct. 1.
    PhRMA, NICA and the Global Colon Cancer Association filed their lawsuit in June, alleging that the negotiations delegate too much authority to the Department of Health and Human Services. 
    The suit also argued that the price talks violate the Eighth Amendment because they include a “crippling” excise tax aimed at forcing drugmakers to accept the government-dictated price of medicines. 
    The groups also argued that the price talks violate due process by denying pharmaceutical companies and the public input on how Medicare negotiations will be implemented.
    Department of Justice attorneys on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services countered that NICA lacked standing because it doesn’t make or sell prescription drugs that could be subject to the negotiations. More

  • in

    Coca-Cola CEO says inflation is moderating in most markets after higher prices boost revenue

    Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey said inflation is moderating in most markets globally, with some exceptions such as Argentina.
    In the majority of Coke’s markets, shoppers were only paying about 3.5% more for their drinks than they were a year earlier.
    “When you think about 95% of the business, 3.5% on a global basis is close to what we were getting prior to Covid, prior to this inflation spike,” Quincey said on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street.”

    James Quincey, CEO of Coca-Cola Co., speaking on “Squawk Box” at the WEF in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 18, 2023.
    Adam Galica | CNBC

    Inflation is moderating in most markets, after a stretch in which the beverage maker relied on price hikes to drive higher revenue, Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey said Tuesday.
    Coke reported its fourth-quarter results Tuesday, and said higher prices helped the company beat Wall Street’s estimates for its quarterly sales. But Coke’s price hikes have slowed from the last two years’ double-digit increases.

    Coke’s overall prices were up 9% in the fourth quarter, but Quincey said that came from hyperinflation in markets such as Argentina. In the majority of Coke’s markets, shoppers were only paying about 3.5% more for their drinks than they were a year earlier.
    “When you think about 95% of the business, 3.5% on a global basis is close to what we were getting prior to Covid, prior to this inflation spike,” Quincey said on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street.”
    The U.S. consumer price index was up 3.1% in January compared with the year-ago period, according to U.S. Department of Labor data released Tuesday.
    In July, Coke executives said the company was done raising prices for 2023. Consumers in Europe and the U.S. had started switching to cheaper private-label juices and bottled water instead of buying its Simply and Smartwater brands.
    Quincey also said Tuesday that the U.S. consumer has gone in two different directions. Those with more disposable income are buying Coke’s premium drinks, such as Fairlife milk, while those with tighter budgets are pulling back their spending and buying more value packs.

    Coke’s North American volume shrank 1% in the quarter as a result.
    Shares of Coke fell less than 1% in morning trading.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Boeing orders, deliveries dry up in January as plane-maker grapples with latest Max crisis

    Boeing delivered 27 planes in January, down from 67 in December and its lowest tally since September.
    It sold three Boeing 737 Max planes, but also logged three cancellations.
    Boeing executives have been scrambling to persuade airline customers, investors and regulators that it will find more reliable footing after a Jan. 5 incident on an Alaska Airlines flight.

    An aerial photo shows Boeing 737 MAX airplanes parked on the tarmac at the Boeing Factory in Renton, Washington, U.S. March 21, 2019.
    Lindsey Wasson | Reuters

    Boeing’s aircraft orders and deliveries fell in January as the company grappled with the fallout from a midflight blowout of a fuselage panel on one of its 737 Max 9s, an accident that overshadowed the manufacturer’s strong finish in 2023.
    The company handed over 27 planes last month, its lowest tally since September, compared with 67 deliveries in December. It sold three Boeing 737 Max planes, but also logged three cancellations.

    The deliveries were roughly in line with what some analysts expected. The three gross orders come after a big December when Boeing sold 371 planes.
    Boeing rival Airbus handed over 30 planes in January.
    Boeing executives have been scrambling to persuade airline customers, investors and regulators that it will find more reliable footing after the Jan. 5 accident, when a door plug blew out on an Alaska Airlines flight at 16,000 feet shortly after it left Portland, Oregon. No one was seriously injured on Flight 1282, but the violent detachment ripped off headrests and exposed travelers to a gaping hole in the 26th row.
    Bolts that hold the unused exit door panel in place appeared to be missing from the fuselage piece, which had been removed and put back at Boeing’s 737 Max factory in Renton, Washington, the National Transportation Safety Board said in a preliminary report Feb. 6.
    Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun has vowed to review manufacturing processes at the company’s facilities. The Federal Aviation Administration said it would halt Boeing’s planned production increases until it is “satisfied that the quality control issues uncovered during this process are resolved.”

    “I’m sort of glad they called out a pause because that’s a good excuse to just take our time, do it right,” Calhoun said on an earnings call Jan. 31.
    Boeing earlier this month disclosed it would have to rework about 50 undelivered Max planes because of incorrectly drilled holes, a new production glitch that could slow deliveries.
    The FAA is auditing Boeing’s production, and the agency’s administrator, Mike Whitaker, told CNBC last month that it will keep “boots on the ground” at Boeing and perform direct inspections of work there. The audit includes about two-dozen inspectors, stationed at the Renton factory and in Wichita, Kansas, where Spirit Aerosystems makes the Max fuselages.
    Boeing now has to periodically pause its production line, and CFO Brian West said at a TD Cowen investor conference on Tuesday that the company expects to be at a steady rate of 38 Max planes a month in the second half of the year.
    “We are doing that so that we can get the benefit of our audit, we can get the benefit of our own inspection protocols, and that will just slow the line,” West said.
    FAA Administrator Whitaker is traveling to the Renton plant this week.
    Boeing’s January deliveries included three Max planes to Chinese customers, the first in about four years.  More

  • in

    As online romance scams rise, banks ask for help to save victims billions

    Romance scams are run by organized criminal gangs that set up phony social media avatars and use those to connect to potential American victims.
    Once a psychological hook is set, the scammer turns the conversations to money.
    “We need the social media companies to shut down these people that are putting these out there. We need law enforcement engaged to try and prosecute some of these folks,” Paul Benda of the American Bankers Association told CNBC.

    The banking industry is seeking help from the federal government and the social media industry to stop an escalating crisis that’s costing Americans billions of dollars every year: online romance scams.
    These digital crimes have proliferated since the pandemic, as criminals pose as attractive partners and reach out to lonely Americans on social media.

    “We really need help,” Paul Benda, the executive vice president for risk, fraud and cybersecurity at the American Bankers Association, said in an interview with CNBC. “We need the social media companies to shut down these people that are putting these out there. We need law enforcement engaged to try and prosecute some of these folks. Unless you put a bad guy behind bars, that guy is gonna keep doing what he’s doing.”
    Experts estimate that known instances of fraud amount to billions of dollars every year. Factoring in that many victims don’t report their losses to anyone, the overall losses could be in the tens of billions of dollars annually, they say.
    The romance scams are run by organized criminal gangs, often based in Southeast Asia, that set up phony social media avatars and use those to connect to potential American victims. Their targets are male and female, old and young, highly educated and not, according to experts.
    The common theme is loneliness and a willingness to engage online. Once a victim responds to the message, avatar operators launch into a lengthy campaign — often hours of texting each day — designed to persuade the victim that they have fallen in love with a real person. The psychological power of the relationship can take hold surprisingly quickly.
    “Some people get hooked in within a matter of weeks,” Benda said. “It’s that really burning brightness of a relationship where the texts go on constantly, all day and all night and they get hooked into that.”

    Once that psychological hook is set, the scammer turns the conversations to money. In some cases, they present the victim with a sure-fire-seeming investment opportunity, or they prey on the victim’s empathy and solicit money for an expensive but phony medical procedure.
    “Some of the scams I’ve heard of, they literally have people draining their bank accounts, to send the scammer everything that they have,” Benda said. “They want to do anything for the person they love … And these are just evil people taking advantage of vulnerable people.”
    The experts CNBC spoke with said social media companies should do more to throttle this kind of outreach over their platforms and do a better job of taking down the big perpetrators.
    They also saw the value in regulatory changes that would allow financial institutions to talk to one other about customers who are at risk. Some victims may be draining a savings account with one institution to send funds to a fraudster, while the institution that services their 401(k) retirement account remains unaware.
    Scammers will often coach the victim on how to access and transfer funds. And Benda noted banks are in a difficult position, even when they suspect their customer is in the process of being defrauded.
    “We’re legally obligated to provide you access to your funds, full stop. So we can’t stop you from withdrawing from your bank account. Not even if we think that … it’s going to destroy your life,” he said.
    The experience can be an emotional one even for the bank employees who watch the scam play out.
    “We’ve heard stories where we know a bank teller that was sobbing … talking with a longtime customer, begging them not to do this type of thing, and in the end, no, we have to give them access to their funds,” Benda said.
    Banks generally will not reimburse a customer for romance scam losses, Benda explained, because the customer transferred the money of their own free will. And reimbursing victims would likely just make a market that would draw in more scammers.
    Erin West, deputy district attorney in Santa Clara County, California, estimated that between $30 billion and $50 billion was lost to romance scams in 2022.
    “That’s an astonishing number. It’s huge,” she said, adding the caveat that arriving at an estimate can involve some guesswork since victims can be reluctant to report the details of their own financial humiliation.
    But West, who is part of a national group of prosecutors trying to shed light on the problem, said the scale of the emotional wreckage may be even worse. Discovery of these scams can lead to lost marriages, lost careers or a permanent change in financial position.
    “I’ve been in law enforcement for 25 years, and I’ve done sex crimes and I’ve done homicide, and I’ve never heard the depths of despair that you get when someone realizes that the life they thought they’d had is completely gone,” she said. “On one day, to lose a marriage and every last cent that they have, is traumatic for people.”
    West explained there’s a very human reason why lonely people fall for these scams.
    “This kind of crime goes to the very core of what we want in life. We want to feel loved,” she said. “And we want to have a person to come home to, even if it’s by text, who loves us, understands us, and is thinking of us. And they provide exactly that.”
    “And then they provide a dream that not only can you be loved, but you can be financially comfortable beyond your wildest dreams,” West said. “It’s easy to call it lust and greed, but what it really is, is it’s comfort on both levels.”
    — CNBC’s Bria Cousins contributed to this report. More

  • in

    Here’s the inflation breakdown for January 2024 — in one chart

    The consumer price index rose by 3.1% in January, a smaller annual increase than in December.
    Workers’ buying power has increased each month since May.
    However, there were a few potentially worrying signs under the surface.

    People shop at a home improvement store in Brooklyn on Jan. 25, 2024.
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Inflation declined in January and consumers’ buying power rose as price pressures for U.S. goods and services continued to ease.
    The consumer price index, a key inflation gauge, rose 3.1% in January relative to a year earlier, the U.S. Labor Department said Tuesday. That’s down from 3.4% in December.

    The CPI measures how fast the prices of everything from fruits and vegetables to haircuts, concert tickets and household appliances are changing across the U.S. economy.

    While that overall downward trend is encouraging, there were a few “disappointments” under the surface, as inflation rose from December to January in categories such as shelter, food, electricity and airline fares, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.
    Ultimately, it’s likely just a “brief detour” from the broader disinflation trend, which is unlikely to move in a perfectly straight line, he added.
    “You get zigs and zags in all these data, and this was just a zag,” Zandi said. “The bottom line: Inflation continues to moderate. It’s still uncomfortably high — though … moving in the right direction. And all the trend lines still look good aside from today’s data detour.”

    Workers’ paychecks can buy more

    Inflation has fallen significantly from its pandemic-era peak, 9.1%, in June 2022. Around that time, the average consumer’s paycheck wasn’t keeping up with fast-rising prices. Their so-called “real earnings” — earnings after accounting for inflation — were negative for more than two years.

    That dynamic has reversed: Workers’ hourly pay has exceeded the rate of inflation since May. In other words, their wages can buy more. Real average hourly earnings rose by 1.4% between January 2023 and January 2024, the Labor Department said Tuesday.

    Normalizing inflation means consumers don’t need to spend down their “excess savings” to support spending, according to a recent outlook authored by J.P. Morgan’s Global Investment Strategy Group.
    Consumer sentiment jumped 13% in January to its highest level since July 2021, which reflects “improvements in the outlook for both inflation and personal incomes,” according to the University of Michigan.

    Where inflation was high in January

    Cartons of orange juice on display in a grocery store in Los Angeles.
    Mario Tama | Getty Images

    Despite broad disinflation, there are specific categories where inflation remains relatively high.
    “Notable” categories include motor vehicle insurance (where costs are up 20.6% in the past year), recreation (2.8%), personal care (5.3%) and medical care (1.1%), according to the Labor Department.
    Prices for motor vehicle insurance and auto repairs, for example, have risen rapidly following an earlier pandemic-era surge in prices for new and used cars, albeit with a lag.

    Additionally, shelter inflation is up 6% in the last 12 months. Shelter is the largest component of the average household’s budget, and stubbornly high inflation in the category has propped up overall inflation readings.
    Economists expect housing inflation to moderate due to encouraging signals, such as moderating national prices for newly signed leases, a trend that tends to take months to flow into broader inflation data.
    “Everything suggests that’s going to happen,” Zandi said. “The lag is longer than I would have anticipated.”
    More from Personal Finance:Why the ‘last mile’ of inflation fight may be toughWhy disinflation is ‘more ideal’ than deflationWorkers may be unfairly sour on the job market
    Other categories have retreated significantly.
    Inflation for groceries, for example, has declined to 1.2% over the last 12 months, from a peak of around 13.5% in August 2022. Some categories — such as frozen noncarbonated juices and drinks, sugar, and beefsteaks — remain elevated, though. Their prices are up by 29%, 7.2% and 10.7%, respectively.
    Sugar prices, for example, were affected by “ongoing shortfalls and availability issues” in 2023, said Amy Smith, an economist at Advanced Economic Solutions.

    Sugar is a key ingredient in, among other things, juices and drinks; the latter were also affected by bad weather in Brazil and Florida, which reduced production of oranges and led futures on frozen concentrated orange juice to surge to an all-time high in November, Smith said. And beef production was down almost 5% in 2023, due partly to the impact of severe drought on pasture lands, she added.
    Meanwhile, overall energy costs have decreased, or deflated, by 4.6% in the past year, with gasoline down 6.4%, natural gas 17.8% and fuel oil 14.2%.

    Why inflation surged in the pandemic era

    Inflation initially spiked in early 2021 as the U.S. economy reopened from its Covid-19-related shutdown.
    During the pandemic, consumer demand for household goods jumped as people spent more time at home and couldn’t spend on travel and other experiences. Goods production couldn’t keep up with high demand amid snarled supply chains.
    It was a “double whammy” that caused prices to “skyrocket,” according to Jay Bryson, chief economist for Wells Fargo Economics.
    Now, supply chains and consumer demand for goods have largely normalized, Bryson said.
    Inflation in the “services” side of the economy — the intangible things we consume, such as concerts, auto repairs and veterinary visits — is also declining but remains elevated, he said. A big reason for this is wage growth, since labor is a major input cost for services businesses, economists said.
    Businesses’ demand for workers rose to a record high as the economy reopened, and wage growth jumped to its highest level in decades as workers enjoyed ample leverage in the job market. That growth has since eased as the labor market has cooled from red-hot levels, reducing the inflationary pressure for services, but remains elevated, economists said. More

  • in

    Paramount Global lays off about 800 employees, a day after announcing record Super Bowl ratings

    Paramount Global announced Tuesday it is laying off about 800 employees, or roughly 3% of its workforce, according to a person familiar with the matter.
    Paramount Global, which owns CBS, said Monday that the network set record highs for Super Bowl viewership.
    Bakish warned of impending layoffs in an internal note sent in January. He said at the time that Paramount Global must “operate as a leaner company and spend less.”

    Paramount executive Bob Bakish attends the 2022 MTV Europe Music Awards (EMAs) at the PSD Bank Dome in Duesseldorf, Germany, November 13, 2022. 
    Thilo Schmuelgen | Reuters

    Paramount Global is laying off hundreds of employees, just one day after the company announced CBS had record Super Bowl viewership, Chief Executive Officer Bob Bakish said Tuesday in an internal memo to employees.
    Paramount will lay off about 800 people, or an estimated 3% of its workforce, according to a person familiar with the matter. Paramount Global ended 2022 with about 24,500 full-time and part-time employees.

    Affected workers will be notified Tuesday, Bakish said in the note.
    “These adjustments will help enable us to build on our momentum and execute our strategic vision for the year ahead — and I firmly believe we have much to be excited about,” Bakish wrote in the note.
    Paramount shares fell about 4% in morning trading Tuesday.
    Deadline first reported the number of cuts in January.
    Paramount Global owns a variety of assets including CBS, Paramount Pictures, Pluto TV, Paramount+ and cable networks including Nickelodeon, BET and Comedy Central. The job cuts come as the media company considers merger and acquisition options. Paramount Global has held early merger talks with Skydance Media and Warner Bros. Discovery in recent months, CNBC has previously reported.

    The media company had warned employees of impending cuts in a Jan. 25 internal memo. Bakish said at the time that Paramount Global needs to “operate as a leaner company and spend less.”
    Its Paramount+ streaming service continues to lose money each quarter. The platform lost $238 million in the third quarter. The company reports fourth-quarter earnings Feb. 28.

    Blowout Super Bowl

    Super Bowl 58 on CBS was the most-watched television show in history, with an estimated 123.4 million people having watched across all platforms.
    CBS charged a record high average $6.5 million for every 30-second advertisement for the Super Bowl, according to the research company Guideline.
    The network earned tens of millions in additional revenue because the game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Francisco 49ers went into overtime. More