More stories

  • in

    China’s potential new gaming rules will hit smaller developers more, analyst says

    China’s proposed gaming rules would hit smaller developers more than large ones, while also reducing overall online advertising revenue, according to UBS.
    Tencent, NetEase and Bilibili shares plunged to their lowest in more than a year Friday after China’s National Press and Publication Administration published draft rules that would prohibit incentivizing daily sign-ins for games, among other revenue-generating practices.

    Mobile games in China range from League of Legends-like Honor of Kings to
    Source: Apple Inc.

    BEIJING — China’s proposed gaming rules would hit smaller developers more than large ones, while also reducing overall online advertising revenue, according to UBS.
    Tencent, NetEase and Bilibili shares plunged to their lowest in more than a year Friday after China’s National Press and Publication Administration published draft rules that would prohibit incentivizing daily sign-ins for games, among other revenue-generating practices.

    The comment period is open until Jan. 24. Hong Kong markets are closed Monday and Tuesday for Christmas.
    “Big game developers or big DAU [daily active user] social games should fare better: This is because they have other means to boost gamers engagement, reach out to users and have stronger R&D capabilities to attract and retain gamers,” Kenneth Fong, head of China internet research, UBS, said in a note.
    “With a lower revenue for online games, the ad industry would be impacted too,” he said. UBS estimates online games account for about 20% of the online ad industry’s revenue.

    Gaming accounts for the majority of NetEase’s revenue, and about one-fifth or less at Tencent and Bilibili, third-quarter releases show.
    Many other companies develop and publish games in China, although Beijing has in recent years made clear it would like to restrict game play, especially among minors.

    It’s “very common” for online games to encourage daily sign-in and offer rewards for the initial in-app purchase, UBS’s Fong said. He pointed out that incentivizing users to sign in every day boosts engagement and allows for collection of user statistics, which can help developers adjust games in real time.
    However, Fong said it is hard to quantify the financial impact of the proposed regulation since it’s unclear whether it would apply only to new games or also existing ones.
    The National Press and Publication Administration, which controls the publication of new games, said Monday that it approved more than 100 new domestic games, after saying Friday that it approved 40 imported games.
    Generally, Fong expects new games to be affected more than old ones. “As the online game is a very creative industry,” he said, “we believe the game developers would likely design other means to attract and retain users.” More

  • in

    ‘Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom’ has fourth-lowest opening in DCEU franchise history

    “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” collected an estimated $28.1 million during its domestic opening, the fourth-lowest debut for a DC Extended Universe film.
    Only one film from the franchise has debuted with more than $60 million in ticket sales since 2018’s “Aquaman” — “Black Adam” took in $67 million in early 2022.
    Earlier this year, Warner Bros. Discovery announced that the entire franchise would be rebooted in 2025 by the newly minted heads of DC Studios, James Gunn and Peter Safran.

    Jason Momoa stars as Arthur Curry, aka Aquaman, in Warner Bros.’ “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom.”
    Warner Bros. Discovery

    “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” dog-paddled to a $28.1 million domestic opening, the fourth-lowest in the history of the DC Extended Universe.
    The film was expected to open between $32 million and $42 million. As it stands, the $28 million estimate from Warner Bros. Discovery is less than half of the $67.8 million the first “Aquaman” movie brought in during its 2018 debut weekend.

    The film, likely Jason Momoa’s last turn at the titular aquatic hero, is expected to secure around $40 million in ticket sales over the four-day Christmas holiday weekend.
    The weekend performance of “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” is on par with Warner Bros.’ DC franchise in recent years. Only one film from the franchise has debuted with more than $60 million in ticket sales since 2018 — “Black Adam” took in $67 million in early 2022, according to data from Comscore.

    DC Extended Universe film openings

    “Wonder Woman 1984” (2020) — $16.7 million
    “Blue Beetle” (2023) — $25 million
    “The Suicide Squad” (2021) — $26.2 million
    “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” (2023) — $28.1 million
    “Shazam! Fury of the Gods” (2023) — $30.1 million
    “Birds of Prey” (2020) — $33 million
    “Shazam!” (2019) — $53.5 million
    “The Flash” (2023) — $55 million
    “Black Adam” (2022) — $67 million
    “Aquaman” (2018) — $67.8 million
    “Justice League” (2017) — $93.8 million
    “Wonder Woman” (2017) — $103.2 million
    “Man of Steel” (2013) — $116.6 million
    “Suicide Squad” (2016) — $133.6 million
    “Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice” (2016) — $166 million

    Source: Comscore

    The $28 million estimated opening haul is smaller than the $30.1 million “Shazam! Fury of the Gods” tallied earlier this year. Notably, the second “Shazam!” film only managed to collect $57.6 million domestically and $133 million globally during its run in theaters.
    “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” added $80.1 million from international ticket sales Friday through Sunday, bringing its total expected global take to $120 million (including the domestic Christmas expectations for Monday).

    The first “Aquaman” also benefited from international ticket sales back in 2018. More than 70% of its $1.15 billion box office came from markets outside the U.S. and Canada, according to Comscore data.
    Notably, “Aquaman” is the highest-grossing film in the DC Extended Universe franchise and no DCEU film has generated more than $400 million at the global box office since that film was released.
    The franchise has suffered from lackluster quality, as critics have balked at CGI-heavy action sequences and disjointed attempts at bringing heroes together for team-ups. Pandemic-era restrictions also led to smaller box office openings in 2020 and 2021.
    Even as those restrictions have lifted and audiences have returned to theaters, the DCEU has struggled to lure back even its most ardent fans. This was exacerbated earlier this year when Warner Bros. Discovery announced that the entire franchise would be rebooted in 2025 by the newly minted heads of DC Studios, James Gunn and Peter Safran.
    The planned reboot dismayed fans, who believe that “Shazam! Fury of the Gods,” “Blue Beetle,” “The Flash” and “Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom” — all released after the announcement — would have no connection to future DC projects and were not must-see theatrical experiences.
    One bright spot for the “Aquaman” sequel is that it faces limited competition in theaters next week and could benefit from the upcoming holidays, as school vacations have parents seeking out-of-home entertainment.
    “While so-called superhero fatigue may be in play for many films of the genre in 2023, resulting in lower-than-expected opening weekend results, films that open in late December such as ‘Aquaman 2’ often play the long game and draw their audiences throughout the holiday and into the new year,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore. More

  • in

    Universal banks on ‘Migration’ to expand its animation lead over Disney

    Disney’s animation studios have struggled to generate box-office returns in the wake of the pandemic.
    Meanwhile, Universal’s Illumination and DreamWorks studios continue to deliver.
    Universal’s “Migration,” from its Illumination studio, arrives in theaters Friday. Forecasters predict a $25 million opening.

    Universal and Illuminations latest animated film centers on a family of ducks who decides to leave the safety of a New England pond for an adventurous trip to Jamaica. However, their well-laid plans quickly go awry when they get lost and wind up in New York City.

    Disney dropped the animation crown. Universal has picked it up.
    And, with “Migration” opening Friday, the studio is looking to strengthen its grip.

    “Migration,” a comic tale about a family of New England ducks that leave their pond for Jamaica, but end up in New York City, is expected to tally $25 million during its domestic debut. Universal has more conservative expectations, forecasting between $10 million and $15 million in ticket sales for the film’s opening.
    While that pales in comparison to the $100 million-plus debuts of Illumination/Universal’s “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” and the latest “Minions” film, it’s comparable to the studio and DreamWorks Animation’s “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish,” which ran in theaters for several months, securing nearly $500 million globally.
    “‘Migration,’ with solid word-of-mouth and strong reviews, will have to be judged more on its long-term results than the opening weekend splash,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore.
    Disney’s most recent animated film “Wish” failed to connect with audiences. After generating $31.6 million domestically over the five-day Thanksgiving holiday, the film has grossed a total of $55.2 million in the U.S. and Canada. Globally, the film has reached $127.1 million. The film had a budget of $200 million, not including marketing costs.
    For comparison, “Trolls Band Together,” which was released the week before Thanksgiving, secured $30 million for its three-day debut and nearly $180 million worldwide. The film had a budget of $95 million, not including marketing costs.

    Representatives from Disney did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    How Disney lost the crown

    Ariana DeBose stars as Asha in Disney’s new animated film “Wish.”

    Disney established its animated feature empire in the early 20th century with 1937’s “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” and continued to dominate, more or less, into the 1980s and 1990s with “The Little Mermaid” and “Beauty and the Beast.”
    Later, it acquired Pixar, which together with Walt Disney Animation, generated billions in box-office receipts for the company.
    “The world of feature animation has been dominated for decades by Disney and for good reason,” said Dergarabedian. “They set the gold standard.”
    Then came the Covid pandemic. While theaters closed, Disney sought to pad its fledgling streaming service Disney+ with content, stretching its creative teams thin, and sending theatrical movies during the pandemic straight to digital.
    The decision trained parents to seek out new Disney titles on streaming, not theaters, even when Disney opted to return its films to the big screen. Compounding Disney’s woes was a general sense from audiences that the company’s content had grown overly existential and too concerned with social issues beyond the reach of children.
    As a result, no Disney animated feature from Pixar or Walt Disney Animation has generated more than $480 million at the global box office since 2019.
    “I think what’s changed is that Disney doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt,” said Josh Brown, CEO at Ritholtz Wealth Management and a CNBC contributor. “And people will not go to a movie just because it’s the latest Disney movie in the way that previous generations did.”

    Universal appeal

    Meanwhile, Universal’s two animation arms — Illumination and DreamWorks — have thrived.
    Illumination’s “Minions: The Rise of Gru,” which opened in 2022, tallied $942 million worldwide, DreamWorks’ “Puss in Boots: The Last Wish” capped at $485 million after its holiday 2022 opening, and Illumination’s “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” soared to more than $1.3 billion in 2023.
    Even the Magic Kingdom was impressed with the box office of “Super Mario.” Disney CEO Bob Iger praised the rival studio back in May during the company’s fiscal second-quarter earnings call.

    But as moviegoers have returned to cinemas in the wake of the pandemic, more are gravitating toward Universal’s fare.
    “Simply put, Illumination Animation’s only agenda is entertainment,” said Jeff Bock, senior box-office analyst at Exhibitor Relations. “Their animated films are sweet and simple and family audiences appreciate that. Disney sometimes attempts to pack too much into their animated features, and lately have been losing sight of the simplicity of the genre.”
    Not to mention, Universal has been revisiting tried and true fan-favorite stories and characters. In fact, Illumination hasn’t released a nonfranchise film since 2016, and only three of the last 10 DreamWorks features have been original stories.
    For comparison, of the last eight films released by a Disney animation studio, seven have been original films with just 2022’s “Lightyear,” a “Toy Story” spinoff, tied to an existing franchise. Previously, Disney has thrived bringing new animated material to audiences, but in the post-pandemic world, it has struggled.
    It is the exact opposite strategy of Disney’s live-action theatrical releases, which have relied heavily on established franchises. Think “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny,” “The Little Mermaid,” Marvel franchise films and “Haunted Mansion.”
    Iger has said that Disney will continue to make sequels, without apology, but admitted that the company needs to be more selective in which franchises it revisits.
    “I think there has to be a reason to make them, you have to have a good story,” Iger said during The New York Times’ DealBook Summit in late November.

    “Minions: The Rise of Gru” is the sequel to the 2015 film, “Minions,” and spin-off/prequel to the main “Despicable Me” film series.

    In animation, returning to popular characters and worlds is an easy way to capture the attention of parents and kids.
    “Because they have seen these characters and related stories before, they have high confidence that they will be high quality, entertaining and ‘brand safe’ for their kids,” said Peter Csathy, founder and chair of advisory firm Creative Media. “And they may even anticipate franchise animated films as much as their kids.”
    In developing consistent franchise content like Minions and Trolls, Universal is now able to introduce a new film like “Migration” with a sense of clout. Parents who see that the film is from the same studio that brought other fan favorites to the big screen are then more likely to come out to see it.
    It’s what Pixar was able to do so well for nearly three decades.
    “With ‘Minions,’ ‘Secret Life of Pets’ and ‘Sing,’ I think Illumination is a brand people are aware of by now,” said Bock. “And that awareness will boost ‘Migration’s’ flight pattern, likely extending its box-office run. That’s key. The long play.”
    So far, “Migration” has generally favorable reviews from critics. If audiences respond well, and spread the word, the film could see a solid run, adding to the prestige of Universal’s animation brand.
    “The kids animation market opportunity will never grow old, so those playing at the top of the game – as is Illumination – hold the promise and possibility of becoming the next go-to brand for quality animation after Pixar,” said Csathy.
    Next year, Disney and Pixar are set to release “Inside Out 2” in June, while Universal and Illumination’s “Despicable Me 4” is scheduled to hit theaters weeks later in July.
    Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of Universal Pictures and CNBC. More

  • in

    Nike, Foot Locker shares sink after athletic apparel maker cuts revenue outlook

    Shares of both Nike and Foot Locker plunged Friday.
    Nike slashed its revenue outlook and announced $2 billion in cost cuts.
    Foot Locker stores depend heavily on Nike merchandise.

    Nike shares plunged Friday after the athletic apparel maker cut its revenue outlook for the fiscal year, with sneaker retailer Foot Locker also feeling the blow.
    Nike closed down more than 11%. Foot Locker, which relies heavily on Nike products in its stores, closed down nearly 4%.

    It was Nike’s worst day since Sept. 30, 2022, when it fell 12.8%.
    Nike said in its earnings report Thursday that the company now expects its revenue to grow 1% for the fiscal year, down from the prior outlook of mid-single-digit growth. The company also said it was going to cut costs of upward of $2 billion over the next three years.
    The new outlook reflects increased headwinds “particularly in Greater China and EMEA,” finance chief Matthew Friend said in the earnings call Thursday. He also noted digital traffic softness and a stronger U.S. dollar that has “negatively impacted second-half reported revenue versus 90 days ago.”
    “Nike needs improved marketing outside of basketball, streetwear and lifestyle trends,” TD Cowen analysts said in a Friday note, downgrading the stock to market perform from outperform. “Innovation at the higher end of its assortment is not resonating at scale while the Nike faces disruption from smaller competitors in footwear and apparel.”
    Goldman Sachs analysts stuck with their buy rating on Nike’s stock.

    But they also acknowledged that the company’s report “provided ample fodder for bears, with slowing growth momentum as a result of a tougher macro pointing to a more promotional competitive marketplace, and the company now speaking more comprehensively to key franchise life cycle management which will weigh on sales momentum going forward.”
    — CNBC’s Gabrielle Fonrouge and Michael Bloom contributed to this report.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Karuna Therapeutics surges 47% after Bristol Myers Squibb announces $14 billion deal

    Bristol Myers Squibb said it would buy biopharmaceutical company Karuna Therapeutics for $14 billion in cash.
    Karuna develops medications for patients living with neurological and psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia.
    The companies expect the deal to close in the first half of 2024.

    Bristol Myers Squibb on Friday announced it agreed to buy biopharmaceutical company Karuna Therapeutics for $14 billion in cash, or $330 per share.
    Karuna’s stock closed up more than 47% on the news Friday, hitting $317.85 a share. Bristol Myers Squibb shares closed up 2%.

    The deal will help expand Bristol Myers’ drug pipeline after competition from a generic offering caused demand for the company’s blood cancer drug Revlimid to tumble in its third quarter.
    The boards of directors at both Bristol Myers and Karuna unanimously approved the acquisition, and it is expected to close in the first half of 2024, according to a release.
    Karuna develops medications for patients living with neurological and psychiatric conditions. The company’s lead asset is an antipsychotic called KarXT, which is expected to serve as a treatment for adults with schizophrenia beginning in late 2024, the release said.  
    “There are tremendous opportunities in neuroscience, and Karuna strengthens our position and accelerates the expansion and diversification of our portfolio in the space. We expect KarXT to enhance our growth through the late 2020s and into the next decade,” Bristol Myers Squibb CEO Christopher Boerner said in a statement.
    KarXT is also being evaluated as a possible treatment for Alzheimer’s disease psychosis and a form of bipolar disorder, according to the release. Karuna CEO Bill Meury said the company’s portfolio “offers advancements in treatment not seen in many years.”

    “With Bristol Myers Squibb’s long-standing expertise in developing and commercializing medicines on a global scale and legacy in neuroscience, KarXT and the other assets in our pipeline will be well-positioned to reach those living with schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease psychosis,” he said in a statement. 
    Citi and Gordon Dyal & Co. advised Bristol Myers on the deal, while Goldman Sachs served as the exclusive advisor for Karuna.
    — CNBC’s Annika Kim Constantino contributed to this report.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Here’s when you can visit a national park for free in 2024

    Of the 400 U.S. national parks, 109 of them charge an entrance fee, which typically ranges from $20 to $35 per vehicle.
    The National Park Service is offering free admission to those parks on six days in 2024.
    It may still make sense to buy an annual pass, which grants unlimited access year-round, if you plan to visit multiple parks.

    Grand Canyon National Park
    Jacobs Stock Photography | Photodisc | Getty Images

    The National Park Service is offering free admission to U.S. national parks on six days in 2024.
    There are more than 400 national parks in the U.S. Most of them offer free entrance all the time.

    However, 109 parks don’t — including some of the most popular, like Grand Canyon, Zion, Rocky Mountain, Acadia, Yosemite, Yellowstone, Joshua Tree and Glacier national parks.
    More from Personal Finance:U.S. passport delays have eased — but aren’t yet back to normalThe ‘dupe’ trend hit travel in 2023. It’s a good way to save on your next tripNew Europe travel requirement delayed again, to 2025
    Their entrance fees typically range from $20 to $35 per vehicle. (Some may charge per person instead of per vehicle, and there may also be different fees for motorcycles.)
    All parks that generally charge an entrance fee will waive them on the following days next year:

    Jan. 15: Birthday of Martin Luther King Jr.
    April 20: First day of National Park Week.
    June 19: Juneteenth.
    Aug. 4: Anniversary of the Great American Outdoors Act.
    Sept. 28: National Public Lands Day
    Nov. 11: Veterans Day

    It may make sense to buy an annual pass

    Grand Prismatic Spring, Yellowstone National Park.
    Ignacio Palacios | Stone | Getty Images

    Even if you’re planning to visit a park during one of the 2024 free entrance days, it may make financial sense to buy an annual pass ahead of your trip, depending on the itinerary, said Mary Cropper, travel advisor and senior U.S. specialist at Audley Travel.

    The $80 annual pass grants unlimited entrance to national parks and other federal recreation areas. (Some groups can get reduced-price or even free annual passes.)

    For example, a pass would likely be a better option if you plan to visit multiple parks in one trip — in which case you may end up paying the standard entrance fee for each park (outside of the free day), Cropper said.
    “You want to do the math,” she said.

    You may also need a separate reservation

    Yosemite National Park.
    Kenny Mccartney | Moment | Getty Images

    There were nearly 312 million visits to national parks in 2022. While not a record — that title belongs to 2016, the year of the National Park Service centennial — visitation is up about 10% in the last decade.
    Many parks broke visitor records in the pandemic era as Americans sought domestic outdoor trips due to health fears and closed international borders.
    “National parks are just booming right now,” Cropper said. “I think we’ll be witnessing entrance levels climbing.”

    Aside from a standard entrance pass, some parks may require a separate reservation to enter in 2024. Those online reservations generally carry a fee of $2 or more.
    For example, Yosemite recently announced that visitors will need to buy an advance reservation for weekends from April 13 through June 30, and Aug. 17 through Oct. 27, including holidays. They will also need one every day from July 1 through Aug. 16.
    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Here are the big health sector themes to watch next year

    Health care tends to underperform in presidential election years, and Medicare drug price negotiations kicking off in February could keep the focus on high pharmaceutical prices.
    Some of the beaten-down sectors which have help lead the rally in health care this month are poised to extend gains in 2024, however.
    Analysts see diabetes device makers Insulet, Dexcom and Abbott Labs poised to outperform.

    An employee works on the production line of pharmaceutical company Zentiva in Prague, Czech Republic, May 6, 2021.
    David W. Cerny | Reuters

    The health-care sector has wiped out much of its losses for the year during the December market rally. Beaten-down biotech and medical device makers have seen the biggest rebound this month, and analysts see that momentum continuing in the new year.
    Still, analysts and strategists have a mixed outlook for the sector in 2024.

    “We’re entering the year as an underweight,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA. “There’s a lot of overhead resistance, and they have to work through that overhead resistance because a lot of investors might say, ‘let me get out and move on to something that has better growth potential.'”
    The second week of January could bring some big moves for health-care names, when companies present at this year’s JPMorgan health-care conference in San Francisco. It is one of the year’s largest health-care gatherings of major industry CEOs, and companies often provide updates on earnings guidance and clinical trial research during the conference.
    The political calendar could pose one of the biggest challenges. The S&P 500 health-care sector has lagged the S&P 500 in four of the last six presidential cycles. Increased regulatory focus on drug prices could result in another year of underperformance.
    The S&P 500 health-care sector remains on pace for a second straight annual loss, dragged down by Covid vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer, which have fallen more than 40% for the year. Eli Lilly, up more than 55% for the year, is the sector’s biggest gainer, fueled by demand for its diabetes and obesity drugs.
    Here’s a look at which parts of the health industry analysts see facing continued pressure in 2024, which will get some relief, and which beaten-down names are getting investors’ votes for a rebound next year:

    Big Pharma: Price negotiations   

    Novartis scientist in lab packing materials for transportation.
    Source: Novartis

    In 2024, Inflation Reduction Act drug price negotiations will be front and center. Medicare officials will make their initial offers on the first 10 drugs chosen for discussions Feb. 1.
    “This law was passed, and we want to implement it in the most thoughtful manner possible,” said Dr. Meena Seshamani, deputy administrator and director of the federal Center for Medicare, “to really create a robust conversation in our health system in a sense that, how can we ensure access to innovative therapies that people need?”
    The drugmakers have sued the administration but have chosen to proceed with discussions, while complaining that negotiations in this country will be different from those they’ve had with other nations. They argue that U.S. health insurers and pharmacy benefit managers may not pass on full discounts to patients.
    “In a European market, when you negotiate a price, that medicine is readily available to patients, there’s no prior authorizations,” said Victor Bulto, president of Novartis’ U.S. operations.  
    Novartis’ heart medication Entresto is among the first drugs selected for negotiation. Approved by the FDA in 2015, the negotiated Medicare discount on the drug will go into effect in 2026.  
    Bulto argues the IRA’s timeline, making medications eligible for negotiations after nine years on the market, will result in less research for new indications on drugs like cancer treatments.
    “We normally start investigating in the sickest patients, where you establish the benefit risk of your molecule, and then you want to start bringing data earlier,” he said, “to see if you can impact the cause of cancer early. But that takes time and money and a lot of investment.”
    The big question for investors is how steep a discount the Biden administration will ask of manufacturers. Price discussions are expected to remain private until the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reveals its final price next September – unless the drugmakers decide to go public.
    “We are not intending to go out there publicly because we’re going to be part of a back-and-forth negotiation with each individual manufacturer,” said Seshamani. But, she added, if the companies do go public, Medicare could potentially do so as well.

    Health insurers: Benefit management risks cool     

    A CVS location in New York, US, on Thursday, Feb. 9, 2023.
    Stephanie Keith | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Insurers’ pharmacy benefits management divisions, known as PBMs, are under increasing regulatory pressure. CVS Health’s CVS Caremark, Cigna’s Express Scripts and UnitedHealth Group’s OptumRx together account for nearly 80% of market share in the business of administering pharmacy benefits.
    More than two dozen bipartisan bills were proposed in Congress this year, aimed at creating greater PBM price transparency. Yet, given House leadership struggles, none of the measures gathered enough momentum to gain approval by both chambers of Congress.
    “As we move into 2024, history has told us that you tend not to have the major regulatory reform events in health care necessarily play out in the election year,” said Scott Fidel, health-care analyst at Stephens.
    Analysts at Bank of America see improving fundamentals for health insurers next year. They named Humana their top pick for 2024, saying the Medicare insurer is best positioned for strong gains.
    “The reported M&A discussion between Cigna and Humana have raised questions about whether Humana itself is concerned about its own growth outlook,” BofA analysts wrote in a note to clients. “We see Humana walking away from a deal as validation of the core growth story ahead.”  
    Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Sarah James thinks health insurers are well positioned to navigate challenges like higher patient medical costs and Medicare reimbursement changes next year. She also sees a buying opportunity if there are pullbacks amid heated election year rhetoric about health insurance.
    “When you see the multiple compression around election cycles is when you want to put incremental investments or money to work in the sector, because it’s very rare that anything they talk about during their stump speeches, actually pans out,” said James. 

    Medical devices: GLP-1 pressure lifts  

    A pharmacist displays boxes of Ozempic, a semaglutide injection drug used for treating type 2 diabetes made by Novo Nordisk, at Rock Canyon Pharmacy in Provo, Utah, U.S. March 29, 2023. 
    George Frey | Reuters

    Shares of medical device makers were among the biggest losers this year, as investors predicted the surge in popularity of obesity medications, known as GLP-1 receptor agonists, would cut demand for things like diabetes management, knee replacements and bariatric surgery, said E-Squared health portfolio manager Les Funtleyder.
    “Just because there was a lot of concern that GLPs are going to, you know, eliminate all procedures all the time. And that’s not going to happen. That’ll be proven next year,” said Funtleyder. “I think medical devices do best next year.”
    There are signs the sector may have bottomed in October. The iShares Medical Devices ETF has surged more than 15% over the last two months. Two of the sector’s biggest gainers were insulin pump maker Insulet and Dexcom, which makes continuous glucose monitoring devices known as CGMs.
    While both stocks have gained more than 40% in two months, analysts at Leerink Partners raised their price target on Insulet to $270 from $231 and boosted their target on Dexcom to $144 from $128. Prescriptions for diabetes devices remain strong, Leerink said in a note to clients.  
    The diabetes players also have new products on the horizon which could fuel fresh gains next year, said BTIG analyst Marie Thibault.
    “We think investors are already looking toward the anticipated launch of a 15-day sensor for type 2 diabetes non-insulin patients in Summer 2024,” Thibault wrote in a research note, adding that rival CGM maker Abbott Laboratories is also expected to gain approval for its new glucose wearable in the new year.

    Relief for biotech and life science tools  

    Eli Lilly and Company, Pharmaceutical company headquarters in Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
    Cristina Arias | Cover | Getty Images

    The beaten-down biotech sector has wiped out its losses for the year during this month’s rally, with the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF rebounding more than 28% from its October low.
    RBC analyst Brian Abrahams sees the momentum continuing in 2024, fueled in part by the run-up in the GLP-1 drugmakers like Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, which has left them flush with cash.
    “The biotech sector may benefit more and be less overshadowed in the coming year as we potentially see GLP-1 cash flows catalyze more M&A, and biotech efforts to improve upon some of the shortcomings of the leading GLP-1 agents emerge,” Abrahams wrote in a client note.
    Smaller biotech firms faced a cash crunch as the Federal Reserve raised interest rates over the last year, making it tougher for them to access funding and invest in capital expenditures. That had a negative impact on life science tools, but a number of investors see the picture improving next year.
    “We don’t think rates are going to go much higher if at all from here, and that eases the pressure on high-valuation growth stocks going forward,” Advisor Capital Management portfolio manager JoAnne Feeney told CNBC. “And we think it takes the pressure off a lot of life sciences tools companies that were really hurt by the funding challenges of high interest rates. We think that starts to ease.”
    Analysts at Goldman Sachs see life science tools posting stronger gains than the overall health sector next year, after two years of declining sales growth. “We look for a stabilization and ultimately a resumption of an upward revenue and earnings revision cycle which should allow the sector to show absolute outperformance vs the market,” they wrote in a note to clients.
    Goldman’s top tools picks for 2024 are Thermo Fisher, Avantor and Qiagen.
    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Nike sinks 10% after it slashes sales outlook, unveils $2 billion in cost cuts

    Nike said it plans to cut $2 billion in costs over the next three years.
    The sneaker giant also cut its revenue outlook for the fiscal year.
    Nike fell short of Wall Street’s sales estimates for the second quarter in a row.

    A customer enters a Nike store along the Magnificent Mile shopping district in Chicago on Dec. 21, 2022.
    Scott Olson | Getty Images

    Nike on Thursday unveiled plans to cut costs by about $2 billion over the next three years as it lowered its sales outlook.
    The stock fell about 10% after hours. Nike shares were up 4.7% so far this year through Thursday’s close, lagging far behind the S&P 500’s gains for the year. Retailer Foot Locker, which has leaned heavily on Nike products, fell about 7% after hours.

    Nike now expects full-year reported revenue to grow approximately 1%, compared to a prior outlook of up mid-single digits. In the current quarter, which includes the second half of the holiday shopping season, Nike expects reported revenue to be slightly negative as it laps tough prior year comparisons, and sales to be up low single digits in the fourth quarter.
    “Last quarter as I provided guidance, I highlighted a number of risks in our operating environment, including the effects of a stronger U.S. dollar on foreign currency translation, consumer demand over the holiday season and our second half wholesale order books. Looking forward, the impact of these risks is becoming clearer,” finance chief Matthew Friend said on a call with analysts.
    “This new outlook reflects increased macro headwinds, particularly in Greater China and EMEA. Adjusted digital growth plans are based on recent digital traffic softness and higher marketplace promotions, life cycle management of key product franchises and a stronger U.S. dollar that has negatively impacted second-half reported revenue versus 90 days ago.”
    The company still expects gross margins to expand between 1.4 and 1.6 percentage points. Excluding restructuring charges, it expects to deliver on its full-year earnings outlook.
    As part of its plan to cut costs, Nike said it’s looking to simplify its product assortment, increase automation and its use of technology, streamline the overall organization by reducing management layers and leverage its scale “to drive greater efficiency.”

    It plans to reinvest the savings it gets from those initiatives into fueling future growth, accelerating innovation and driving long-term profitability.
    “As we look ahead to a softer second-half revenue outlook, we remain focused on strong gross margin execution and disciplined cost management,” Friend said in a press release.
    The plan will cost the company between $400 million and $450 million in pretax restructuring charges that will largely come to fruition in Nike’s current quarter. Those costs are mostly related to employee severance costs, Nike said.
    Earlier this month, The Oregonian reported that Nike had been quietly laying off employees over the past several weeks and had signaled that it was planning for a broader restructuring. A series of divisions saw cuts, including recruitment, sourcing, brand, engineering, human resources and innovation, the outlet reported.
    The company didn’t immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on The Oregonian’s report.
    During Nike’s fiscal second quarter, it posted a strong earnings beat, indicating its cost-savings initiatives were already underway. But, for the second quarter in a row, it fell short of sales estimates, which is the first time Nike has seen consecutive quarters of revenue misses since 2016.
    Here’s how the sneaker giant performed compared to what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG, formerly known as Refinitiv:

    Earnings per share: $1.03 vs. 85 cents expected
    Revenue: $13.39 billion vs. $13.43 billion expected

    The company reported net income for the three-month period that ended Nov. 30 was $1.58 billion, or $1.03 per share, compared to $1.33 billion, or 85 cents per share, a year earlier.
    Sales rose about 1% to $13.39 billion, from $13.32 billion a year earlier.
    Nike is considered a leader among industry peers such as Lululemon, Adidas and Under Armour, but its profits have been under pressure and it has been in the middle of a strategy shift that has seen it rekindle its relationships with wholesalers including Macy’s and Designer Brands, the parent company of DSW.

    Focus on margins

    For the past six quarters, Nike’s gross margin has declined compared to the prior-year period, but the story turned around on Thursday. Nike’s gross margin increased 1.7 percentage points to 44.6%, slightly ahead of estimates, according to StreetAccount.
    This time last year, Nike’s inventories were up a staggering 43% and the retailer was in the middle of an aggressive liquidation strategy to clear out old styles and make way for new ones, which weighed heavily on its margins. Several quarters later, however, Nike is in a far better inventory position, which is a boon for margins.
    During the quarter, inventories were down 14% to $8 billion.
    Nike’s gross margin turnaround came as the retail environment overall has been flooded with steep promotions and discounts as retailers struggle to convince inflation-weary consumers to pay full price. In September when Nike reported fiscal first-quarter earnings, finance chief Friend said Nike was “cautiously planning for modest markdown improvements” given the overall promotional environment.
    While the company repeatedly pointed out the overall promotional environment, it said the average sales price of footwear and apparel were up during the quarter and the average selling price grew across channels with higher-priced products proving particularly “resilient.”
    The company attributed the gross margin uptick to “strategic pricing actions and lower ocean freight rates,” saying it was partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange rates and higher product input costs.
    As one of the last retailers to report earnings before the December holidays, investors are eager to hear good news when it comes to Nike’s expectations for the crucial shopping season. When many retailers issued holiday-quarter guidance in November, the commentary was largely tepid and cautious as companies looked to under promise and over deliver in an increasingly uncertain macro environment.
    Nike struck a note that hit somewhere in the middle. Its sales miss and focus on cost cuts signal larger demand issues, but CEO John Donahoe was upbeat when discussing Black Friday week sales.
    “We outpaced the industry, driving growth of close to 10%, Nike digital had its strongest Black Friday week ever and a record number of consumers shopped in our stores over the long Thanksgiving weekend,” said Donahoe.
    China is another key part of the Nike story. As the region emerges from the Covid-19 pandemic and widespread lockdowns, China’s economic recovery has so far been a mixed bag. In November, retail sales climbed 10.1% in the region.
    It was the fastest pace of growth since May, but those numbers were up against easy comparisons and the growth was largely driven by car sales and restaurants, according to a research note from Goldman Sachs.
    During the quarter, China sales came in at $1.86 billion, which fell short of the $1.95 billion analysts had expected, according to StreetAccount. Sales in Europe, the Middle East and Africa also fell short of estimates, but revenue came in ahead in the North America, Asia-Pacific and Latin America markets, according to StreetAccount.
    Read the full earnings release here.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More