More stories

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Carnival, Nasdaq, Oracle, KeyCorp and more

    The Carnival Miracle cruise ship operated by Carnival Cruise Line is docked at Pier 27 in San Francisco, Sept. 30, 2022.
    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making the biggest moves midday.
    Carnival — The stock rallied 12.45% after it was upgraded by JPMorgan Chase to overweight from neutral and by Bank of America to buy from neutral. The former cited continued demand momentum in the cruise industry. Other cruise stocks also got a boost, with Norwegian Cruise Line gaining 7.22% and Royal Caribbean adding 2.57%.

    Chinook Therapeutics — Shares soared 58.32% after Novartis announced it has agreed to acquire the biotech firm for up to $3.5 billion. Chinook Therapeutics’ shareholders will get $40 per share, about 67% higher than where the stock closed Friday. They may also get an additional $4 per share in cash through contingent value rights.
    Nasdaq — Shares fell 11.81% after the exchange operator announced it was buying Adenza, the software firm owned by Thoma Bravo. The deal is valued at about $10.5 billion.
    SentinelOne — The cybersecurity stock popped 8.18% after Morgan Stanley upgraded shares to overweight and called SentinelOne a “long-term share gainer” despite its recent execution troubles.
    Oracle — Shares of the IT cloud software company gained 5.99% ahead of its quarterly earnings announcement scheduled for after the bell. Wolfe Research upgraded shares to outperform from peer perform in a Sunday note, citing the company’s early-mover advantage in the artificial intelligence boom.
    Catalent — The stock jumped 10.23% after reporting delayed fiscal third-quarter results before the bell. The pharmaceutical company posted a loss of 9 cents per diluted share, excluding items, and revenue of $1.04 billion. It’s unclear if these figures are compatible with FactSet’s consensus estimates on revenue and EPS. CEO Alessandro Maselli said the fundamentals of the business remain strong.

    Nio — The Chinese electric car maker’s stock added 8.67% after Nio said it was cutting prices for its vehicles and ending free battery swaps for new buyers. The company is also delaying capital expenditure projects, it said last week. Nomura assumed coverage of Nio with a neutral rating Sunday, after previously rating it a buy.
    Illumina — Shares of the biotech company rose 3.79%. Illumina announced a change in leadership Sunday. CEO Francis deSouza resigned, effectively immediately, but will stay on in an advisory capacity through July. The company said it is exploring both internal and external replacement candidates. The change comes after a heated proxy fight with activist investor Carl Icahn.
    KeyCorp — The regional bank stock slipped 4.31% after the company said at an investor conference that net interest income is going to come in softer than expected based on funding mix and deposit cost pressures.
    — CNBC’s Hakyung Kim, Alex Harring, Samantha Subin and Jesse Pound contributed reporting. More

  • in

    The Golden Globes find new home as the Hollywood Foreign Press Association shuts down

    Dick Clark Productions, alongside asset management company Eldridge, has acquired all the assets, rights and properties of the Golden Globes from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.
    The financial details of the transaction were not disclosed, but the deal will result in the end of the HFPA and its membership.
    The next Golden Globe Awards will take place Jan. 7, 2024.

    Golden Globe Awards on display during the unveiling of the nominations for the 80th Golden Globe Awards, Beverly Hills, California, Dec. 12, 2022.
    Michael Tran | AFP | Getty Images

    And the Golden Globes go to … Dick Clark Productions.
    The California nonprofit announced Monday that it and asset management company Eldridge acquired all the assets, rights and properties of the Golden Globes from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.

    The financial details of the transaction were not disclosed, but the deal will result in the end of the HFPA and its membership.
    Dick Clark Productions, which runs the Billboard Music Awards and Dick Clark’s New Year’s Rockin’ Eve, will now plan, host and produce the annual Golden Globe Awards show. The company has also formed the Golden Globe Foundation, which will continue the HFPA’s legacy of entertainment-related charitable giving.
    “As stewards of the Golden Globe Awards, our mission is to continue creating the most dynamic awards ceremony on live television viewed across the world,” said Jay Penske, CEO, chairman and founder of Penske Media and CEO of Dick Clark Productions. “We have a great team in place to grow this iconic brand and captivate new and existing audiences to celebrate the very best in television and motion pictures.”
    The dissolvement of the HFPA and the transition of the Golden Globes to Dick Clark Productions comes on the heels of several controversies surrounding the journalist organization. In 2021, NBC refused to air the 2022 annual show due to concerns about the lack of diversity in the group’s ranks. The Golden Globes returned to NBC in 2023.
    The fallout began in February 2021, when a Los Angeles Times exposé detailed that none of the 87 members of the group were Black and called into question the credentials of many of the LA-based journalists working for foreign media outlets. Many were found to only contribute sporadically to obscure overseas outlets.

    For years, many within the industry and outside it questioned why certain projects and talent received HFPA award nominations and others did not. Often, the Golden Globes nominees differed sharply from those at guild award ceremonies and the Academy Awards.
    There were also concerns about the HFPA’s practice of accepting gifts during its voting period after dozens of its members traveled to France to visit Netflix’s “Emily in Paris” set and were put in a five-star, $1,400-a-night hotel on the Paramount Network’s dime. The show subsequently received two Golden Globe nominations.
    The next Golden Globe Awards will take place Jan. 7, 2024.
    Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC. More

  • in

    Is the global housing slump over?

    In Australia house prices have risen for the past three months. In America a widely watched index of housing values has risen by 1.6% from its low in January, and housebuilders’ share prices have done twice as well as the overall stockmarket. In the euro area the property market looks steady. “[M]ost of the drag from housing on gdp growth from now on should be marginal,” wrote analysts at JPMorgan Chase, a bank, in a recent report about America. “[W]e believe the peak negative drag from the recent housing-market slump to private consumption is likely behind us,” wrote wonks at Goldman Sachs, another bank, about South Korea. Economists had expected a house-price bloodbath. In March 2022, the month that the Federal Reserve started raising rates to combat inflation, the average value of a house in a rich country was 41% higher than five years earlier. Prices had bounced back from the financial crisis of 2007-09, then surged during the covid-19 pandemic (see chart). Since then central-bank policy rates have risen by more than three percentage points on average globally, making mortgages costlier and slowing the economy. Global house prices have certainly come off the boil. They are 3% below their recent peak, or 8-10% lower once adjusted for inflation. This is in line with the average correction since the late 19th century. Yet this episode is different because it followed a boom during the pandemic when prices rose at their fastest rate of all time. The upshot is that real house prices remain miles above the level of 2019. Many millennials and Gen-Zers, who had dreamt that a crash would allow them to buy their first house, are no doubt disappointed. During a typical global housing slump some countries have a torrid time. After the financial crisis Irish house prices fell by half. American house prices dropped by 20%. This time the underperformers are doing better. In San Francisco house prices are a tenth off their peak, as tech types have decamped to Florida and Texas. Yet they have stopped falling—and the average house will still set you back over $1.1m.In Australia, where in 2020-21 house prices went bananas, they have fallen by 7%. But, as a recent auction hinted, the market is recovering. A two-bedroom bungalow in Double Bay, a greying suburb on Sydney’s harbour, recently opened at A$4m ($2.7m). It represents, the auctioneer declares, an “outstanding opportunity to come along and add a lot of value”. Translation: it needs some work. That does not deter the well-heeled crowd which jostles outside its gate—the bidding is frantic. The gavel finally drops at over A$6m.By contrast with previous housing slumps, there is no hint that lower house prices have created financial contagion. Banks do not seem worried about a surge in bad mortgages. They have fewer risky loans and have not binged on dodgy subprime securities. In New Zealand mortgage arrears have risen, but remain below their pre-pandemic norm. In America delinquencies on single-family mortgages recently hit a post-financial-crisis low. In Canada the share of mortgages in arrears is close to an all-time low. Nor do property woes appear to be throttling the wider economy. Weaker housing investment is dragging on economic growth, but the effect is small. In previous housing busts the number of builders declined sharply long before the rest of the labour market weakened. Yet today there is still red-hot demand for them. In South Korea construction employment has dropped slightly from its pandemic highs but now seems to be growing again. In America it is rising by 2.5% a year, in line with the long-run average. In New Zealand construction vacancies are well above historical levels.Three factors explain the rich world’s surprising housing resilience: migration, household finances, and preferences. Take migration first, which is breaking records across the rich world. In Australia net migration is running at twice pre-pandemic levels, while in Canada it is double the previous high. Demand from the new arrivals is supporting the market. Research suggests that every 100,000 net migrants to Australia raise house prices by 1%. In London, the first port of call for many new arrivals to Britain, rents for new lets rose by 16% last year.Strong household finances, the second factor, also play a role. Richer folk drove the housing boom, with post-crisis mortgage regulations shutting out less creditworthy buyers. In America in 2007 the median mortgagor had a credit score of around 700 (halfway decent), but in 2021 it was close to 800 (pretty good). Wealthier households can more easily absorb higher mortgage payments. But many borrowers will also have locked in past low interest rates. From 2011 to 2021 the share of mortgages across the eu on variable rates fell from close to 40% to less than 15%. Even as rates have risen, the average ratio of debt-service payments to income across the rich world remains lower than its pre-pandemic norm. As a result fewer households have had to downsize, or sell up, than during previous slumps. The pandemic itself has played a role. In 2020-21 many households drastically cut back on consumption, leading to the accumulation of large “excess savings” worth many trillions of dollars. These savings have also cushioned families from higher rates. Analysis by Goldman Sachs suggests a positive correlation across countries between the stock of excess savings and resilience in house prices. Canadians accumulated vast savings during the pandemic; against expectations home prices have recently stabilised. Swedes amassed smaller war chests, and their housing market is a lot weaker.The third factor relates to people’s preferences. Research published by the Bank of England suggests that shifts in people’s wants—potentially including the desire for a home office, or a house over a flat—explained half of the growth in British house prices during the pandemic. In many countries, including Australia, the average household size has shrunk, suggesting that people are less willing to house-share. And at a time of higher inflation, many people may want to invest in physical assets, such as property and infrastructure, that better hold their value in real currency. All this could mean that housing demand will remain higher than it was before the pandemic, limiting the potential fall in prices.Could the housing bust be merely delayed? Perhaps. Some past house-price declines, including in the late 19th century, were grinding rather than spectacular. Central bankers may also be minded to raise rates or keep them high until the higher cost of money truly starts to bite. Making homeowners feel poorer is one way of getting them to cut spending, which would help trim inflation.Yet there is reason to believe the worst is over. After reaching an all-time low last year, consumer confidence across the rich world is rising again. Households on average still have plenty of excess savings. A structural shortage of housing means that there is almost always someone willing to buy if someone else cannot. And there is little sign that people are losing their taste for home offices and weight-lifting in the attic. The housing boom may have ended, and with a whimper, not a bang. ■ More

  • in

    The rich often misjudge the potency of their retirement savings, report finds

    More than one-quarter of all U.S. households think they’re on track to maintain their standard of living in retirement but are actually at risk of falling short, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
    The affluent are more likely to hold this mistaken view, the center said in a new report.
    Booming stock and housing markets may have contributed to a “wealth illusion” among high-income households.

    Courtneyk | E+ | Getty Images

    Many Americans are mistaken about their financial preparedness for retirement. But overconfidence skews higher for the wealthy than for others, according to a new report.
    Twenty-eight percent of all U.S. households have an overly rosy view. They think they’re on track to maintain their standard of living in retirement but are actually at risk of falling short, according to an analysis by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

    The analysis examines these households by income group. Thirty-two percent of high-income households are “not worried enough” about their retirement risk, a larger share than the 26% of low- and middle-income earners.
    More from Personal Finance:’Quiet luxury’ may be Americans’ most expensive trend ever3 steps to take before you start investingSocial Security may be key issue for GOP presidential rivals
    The divergence between perception and reality can be dangerous, experts said. Such households may be able to save more money during their working years but don’t know they should do so.
    “If they’re not aware they should be saving more, they run the risk of having to cut back their consumption — perhaps substantially — in retirement,” said Anqi Chen, senior research economist and assistant director of savings research at the Boston College center.
    They may also be unable to manage some risks in old age like higher health-care costs, added Chen, who co-authored the report.

    There’s an important caveat here: The meaning of being “at risk” differs between income groups. Low-income earners who are at risk may not be able to afford basic living necessities in old age, while an affluent household is unlikely to fall into poverty, for example, the analysis said.
    The affluent risk a “difficult adjustment that may require them to lower their expectations of their retirement lifestyle,” the report said.

    There are headwinds against retirement security

    The analysis leverages data from the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, a triennial assessment of households. Its most recent iteration reflects 2019 data.
    The survey defines income groups by age and marital status. For example, the 2019 survey defines married couples ages 45 to 47 as low-, middle- and high-income if their median income is $50,000, $110,000 and $248,000, respectively.
    The Center for Retirement Research uses the survey data to construct a National Retirement Risk Index. The index models retirement preparedness according to a range of assets like Social Security, pensions, home equity and employer-sponsored retirement plans, such as a 401(k).

    If they’re not aware they should be saving more, they run the risk of having to cut back their consumption — perhaps substantially — in retirement.

    assistant director of savings research, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College

    In 2019, 47% of American households were at risk of not being able to maintain their standard of living in retirement, according to the index. That’s down slightly from the years following the 2008 financial crisis, but up significantly from earlier in the current century.
    Many factors have put pressure on Americans’ retirement preparedness.
    For one, they’re living longer, meaning their savings must stretch over a greater number of years.

    Why the rich are more likely to underestimate risk

    Westend61 | Westend61 | Getty Images

    Nineteen percent of U.S. households correctly identify as being at risk of falling short in retirement, according to the center’s report. But the more concerning cohort is the aforementioned 28% of households who aren’t worried enough, experts said.
    “The ones who worry me the most are the people who think they’re in good shape but they’re not,” said David Blanchett, head of retirement research at PGIM, the investment-management arm of Prudential Financial.
    The booming stock and housing markets may be giving a “wealth illusion” to affluent households that disproportionately own these financial assets, Chen said.

    The ones who worry me the most are the people who think they’re in good shape but they’re not.

    David Blanchett
    head of retirement research at PGIM

    For example, the median price of a home sold in the U.S. had jumped to $327,000 by the end of 2019, up from $223,000 at the beginning of 2010, according to federal data tracked by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. The S&P 500 roughly tripled over that period.
    Further, about 24% of affluent households who underestimated their retirement risk had a large amount of housing debt relative to their home equity — three times more than middle and lower earners, according to the Center for Retirement Research analysis.
    Social Security also replaces a smaller portion of annual income for wealthy households relative to other income groups — meaning they must save more money to maintain their standard of living.

    Saving money is the one thing that “dramatically improves” a household’s retirement readiness, Blanchett said.
    Aside from the obvious benefit of having a larger pool of assets from which to draw in old age, saving more money today effectively reduces one’s standard of living, Blanchett said. More money saved means less money spent, and households grow accustomed to living on a lower monthly budget — a lifestyle change that would likely carry into retirement, he added.
    The easiest way for households to get a rough sense of their retirement preparedness is by consulting two or three free online retirement calculators and inputting all relevant financial information, Blanchett said. Someone who wants a more detailed examination or personalized plan might consider consulting a financial planner, he said. More

  • in

    The world’s top H.P. Lovecraft expert weighs in on a monstrous viral meme in the A.I. world

    The tentacled shoggoth from H.P. Lovecraft’s “At the Mountains of Madness” has become a viral meme in the AI world.
    The meme is a metaphor for concerns that artificial intelligence could one day become indifferent to humans.
    But S.T. Joshi, the leading Lovecraft scholar, says it’s not quite that simple.

    Illustration by Elham Ataeiazar

    Artificial intelligence is scary to a lot of people, even within the tech world. Just look at how industry insiders have co-opted a tentacled monster called a shoggoth as a semi-tongue-in-cheek symbol for their rapidly advancing work.
    But their online memes and references to that creature — which originated in influential late author H.P. Lovecraft’s novella “At the Mountains of Madness” — aren’t quite perfect, according to the world’s leading Lovecraft scholar, S.T. Joshi.

    related investing news

    7 hours ago

    If anyone knows Lovecraft and his wretched menagerie, which includes the ever-popular Cthulhu, it’s Joshi. He’s edited reams of Lovecraft collections, contributed scores of essays about the author and written more than a dozen books about him, including the monumental two-part biography “I Am Providence.”
    So, after The New York Times recently published a piece from tech columnist Kevin Roose explaining that the shoggoth had caught on as “the most important meme in A.I.,” CNBC reached out to Joshi to get his take — and find out what he thought Lovecraft would say about the squirmy homage from the tech world.
    “While I’m sure Lovecraft would be grateful (and amused) by the application of his creation to AI, the parallels are not very exact,” Joshi wrote. “Or, I should say, it appears that AI creators aren’t entirely accurate in their understanding of the shoggoth.”
    Read more: How to talk about AI like an insider
    First of all, it’s “shoggoth,” not “Shoggoth,” Joshi said. The capitalized version of the word, as it’s spelled in the Times article, has indeed appeared in many editions of “At the Mountains of Madness,” which was first published in “Astounding Stories” in 1936, the year before Lovecraft died at age 46. But decades ago, Joshi found that Lovecraft himself made it lowercase in his manuscript and typescript of the science fiction/horror tale set in Antarctica.

    “It is a species name, not a proper name,” Joshi wrote in an email to CNBC.
    But that’s a minor quibble. There are bigger thematic things to consider.
    Workers and others in the generative-AI field use the shoggoth meme, which often appears as a squiggly cartoon festooned with eyes and appendages, to acknowledge the mysterious, at-times frightening potential of the technology. “That some A.I. insiders refer to their creations as Lovecraftian horrors, even as a joke, is unusual by historical standards,” Roose wrote in his Times column.
    The recent advancement of generative AI has already provoked references to science fiction classics such as “The Terminator” and “The Matrix,” or Harlan Ellison’s chilling science fiction story “I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream,” all of which portray sinister artificial intelligence wiping out most of humanity.
    Bringing Lovecraft’s cosmic horrors into the mix might seem excessive at this point, even as the technology creates uncanny things. For instance, a recent fake Toronto Blue Jays ad, created by a TSN producer who used text-to-video AI tech, is packed with horrifying images such as people feasting on each other’s hot dog tentacles.
    The shoggoth meme’s creator, known by the Twitter handle @TetraspaceWest, said the inspiration came about because Lovecraft’s monsters are “indifferent and their priorities are totally alien to us and don’t involve humans, which is what I think will be true about possible future powerful A.I.”

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Astounding Stories – February 1936 (Street & Smith) – “At the Mountains of Madness” by H. P. Lovecraft. Artist Howard V. Brown, 1936
    Pierce Archive LLC | Buyenlarge | Getty Images

    The meme also tries to put a happy face on the shoggoth — literally — as it usually depicts the monster sporting a smile emoji on a tentacle. That’s in reference to efforts to train language models to be nice, according to the Times. It also reads like a commentary on how futile and absurd it might be to try.
    Lovecraft’s shoggoths probably wouldn’t entertain the idea of sending a friendly signal, and, in the story, they certainly aren’t indifferent to their creators, whom they try to usurp.
    While artificial intelligence is based in machines, the monsters in the novella are organically bred slave creatures that develop brains and their own will, Joshi pointed out. Lovecraft describes a shoggoth as a “column of foetid black iridescence” consisting of “protoplasmic bubbles, faintly self-luminous, and with myriads of temporary eyes forming and unforming as pustules of greenish light.”
    A big concern among people who fear AI is that the programs will someday become more intelligent than humans and take over. There is no parallel event in Lovecraft’s story. The shoggoths don’t end up surpassing their masters, the ancient Old Ones, “in intelligence or any other capacity,” Joshi writes. “Lovecraft clearly states otherwise.”
    That’s not to say the meme totally misses the mark.
    In the story, shoggoths rise up against the Old Ones in a series of slave revolts that surely contribute to the collapse of the Old Ones’ society, Joshi notes. The AI anxiety that inspired comparisons to the cartoon monster image certainly resonates with the ultimate fate of that society.
    “So the general metaphor of an artificial creation overwhelming its creator does have some sort of parallel to AI (or the fears of what AI might do in the future), but it’s a fairly inexact parallel,” Joshi wrote.
    But even this imperfect metaphor pairs well with what happens in Lovecraft’s story, which describes a once-grand civilization that had too many problems to fix.
    In our world — a world beset by toxic wildfire smoke and water shortages, violent insurrections in democracies, and the most military combat in Europe since World War II — AI is just part of a whole. There’s a lot of hype and confusion around it, as well as positive potential. There are also real concerns, namely in how AI could act as an accelerant for bigotry and extremism, or as an engine for misinformation, or as a job killer.
    In the novella, the Old Ones fall prey to a variety of threats, including attacks from rival entities who come from outer space. The story ends with insinuations of even greater mind-shattering horrors that lay beyond the mountains of madness.
    In reality, humans could well scale those terrible heights with the help of AI, but only if we let it happen. Maybe we should be the ones wearing the smiley faces. More

  • in

    Washington Post publisher, CEO Fred Ryan to depart after overseeing growth under Jeff Bezos

    Fred Ryan announced he is stepping down from his position as publisher and chief executive of The Washington Post.
    Ryan, who started in his post shortly after Jeff Bezos’ acquisition of the newspaper, will lead the newly formed nonpartisan Center on Public Civility at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation.
    Bezos said Monday his “longtime friend and colleague” Patty Stonesifer will take over as interim CEO. Ryan will remain as publisher through August.

    From left, Washington Post Publisher Fred Ryan, Executive Editor Marty Baron, and National Security Editor Peter Finn, applaud as investigative reporter Tom Hamburger speaks to the newsroom after The Washington Post wins two pulitzer prizes, Monday, April 16, 2018, in Washington.
    Andrew Harnik | AP

    Washington Post publisher and CEO Fred Ryan announced on Monday that he will step down from the helm of the newspaper in August.
    Ryan, who oversaw The Washington Post for the last nine years soon after Amazon founder Jeff Bezos acquired it, will instead lead the newly formed nonpartisan Center on Public Civility at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation.

    “Jeff is personally providing support for the planning and design phase of this new initiative and supports my decision to make this move,” Ryan told Washington Post staffers in a memo on Monday.
    Ryan said that under his leadership, the Post transitioned from a local print newspaper to a global digital publication, and won 13 Pulitzer Prize awards. In a statement, the Washington Post said that it saw multiple years of profitability and a dramatic jump in digital subscriptions under Ryan.
    But the Post has not been immune to broader industry struggles. The newspaper has laid off newsroom and business employees in recent years.
    A wave of job cuts has hit the media industry recently, in both digital and traditional newsrooms. The industry also has been grappling with the rise of artificial intelligence, and newsrooms, including the Washington Post, have started to address such issues as safety, compensation for intellectual property, transparency, accountability and fairness.
    In his memo, Ryan said his career transition comes as he harbors “a deep and growing concern about the decline in civility and respectful dialogue in our political process, on social media platforms and more broadly across our society.”

    “Many of us can recall an era when people could disagree without being disagreeable. Political leaders on opposite sides of the aisle could find common ground for the good of the country,” he continued. “Today, the decline in civility has become a toxic and corrosive force that threatens our social interactions and weakens the underpinnings of our democracy. I feel a strong sense of urgency about this issue.”
    While Ryan will remain as publisher until August, Bezos said Monday in another memo that his “longtime friend and colleague” Patty Stonesifer will join as interim CEO. Stonesifer, an Amazon board member who was the founding CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation following executive roles at Microsoft, will lead the search for a new CEO.
    Read Fred Ryan’s memo to employees here:
    Subject: Message for Washington Post Colleagues
    Dear Washington Post Colleagues,
    Nine years ago, I was honored to be selected by Jeff Bezos to be Publisher and CEO of The Washington Post. Working with Jeff and the exceptional team at The Post has been an incredible experience and enormously gratifying.
    Together, we have accomplished one of the most extraordinary transformations in modern media history. We have evolved from a primarily local print newspaper to become a global digital publication. We’ve added significantly to the tremendous team of journalists, engineers and business experts and have taken The Post through multiple years of profitability. We’ve launched an innovative new technology platform that is powering hundreds of other news sites around the world.
    During this time, we have won multiple awards for exceptional journalism, including 13 Pulitzer Prizes, and we’ve twice been named “The World’s Most Innovative Media Company” by Fast Company.
    As I have shared in conversations with many of you, I have a deep and growing concern about the decline in civility and respectful dialogue in our political process, on social media platforms and more broadly across our society. Many of us can recall an era when people could disagree without being disagreeable. Political leaders on opposite sides of the aisle could find common ground for the good of the country. Today, the decline in civility has become a toxic and corrosive force that threatens our social interactions and weakens the underpinnings of our democracy. I feel a strong sense of urgency about this issue.
    As a result, I have decided to leave my position at The Post to lead the nonpartisan Center on Public Civility that is being launched by the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute. Jeff is personally providing support for the planning and design phase of this new initiative and supports my decision to make this move.
    In order to provide advice and counsel during this transition, I have agreed to remain as Publisher of The Washington Post until August 1. Jeff will announce a new interim CEO later today. It is an exceptional individual that I hold in the highest regard.
    In the weeks and months ahead, I look forward to spending time with all of my friends and colleagues across The Post to convey my deep appreciation for your many impressive contributions to our success. I am committed to providing my full support as the interim CEO charts the course of this transition and the bright future ahead for The Post.
    With my deepest appreciation to each of you,
    Fred.
    Read Jeff Bezos’ memo here:
    Subject: Message for The Washington Post Team
    Dear Washington Post Team,
    I want to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to Fred for his dedicated service to The Washington Post as our Publisher and CEO.
    Fred has led The Post through a period of innovation, journalistic excellence, and growth. His focus on the intersection of journalism and technology has been of great benefit to readers and has laid the foundation for future growth.
    Fred is widely respected for championing press freedom and the protection of journalists. In addition to launching the Press Freedom Partnership, he’s been a relentless force in his devotion to secure the release of journalists who have been wrongly detained and an unwavering voice for accountability from those who do them harm.
    I’m deeply grateful to Fred for his leadership and for the friendship that we’ve developed over the years. I look forward to continuing to enjoy both as he works to advance civility in our nation’s discourse.
    To ensure we don’t skip a beat, Fred has agreed to remain as Publisher for the next two months, and my longtime friend and colleague Patty Stonesifer will join The Post today as interim CEO. She’ll head up our leadership team, steer us through this important transition, and help me identify the Publisher/CEO who will take the Post forward into the next decade. Patty has built and led great organizations. You’ll soon see for yourself why I admire her. Her skills, judgement, and character all stand out. She also understands the importance of our mission and has a deep respect for the work we do here.
    Please join me in thanking Fred as he prepares for his new venture and in welcoming Patty as she assumes the interim CEO role.
    Many thanks,
    Jeff More

  • in

    Andreessen Horowitz to open first office outside the U.S. in London in bet UK will become crypto hub

    Andreessen Horowitz said it was looking to take advantage of what it sees as a more welcoming environment for crypto and Web3 entrepreneurs in the U.K.
    The U.S. has been heavily restrictive with its enforcement of companies and projects in crypto lately, announcing huge lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase last week.
    Andreessen Horowitz has been one of the most active investors in crypto and Web3.

    Andreessen Horowitz partner Marc Andreessen.
    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    LONDON — Andreessen Horowitz is opening its first office outside of the U.S. in London, the venture capital firm announced Monday.
    Andreessen Horowitz, a Silicon Valley venture capital firm that has backed leading tech companies from Airbnb to Coinbase, said it was looking to take advantage of what it sees as a more welcoming environment for crypto entrepreneurs in the U.K. The firm believes the U.K. will become a global leader in crypto, blockchain and digital currencies.

    The U.S. has been cracking down on the crypto industry lately, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announcing lawsuits against crypto titans Binance and Coinbase last week. Essentially, the SEC is arguing many crypto tokens should be classified as securities, which would subject them to much stricter oversight and transparency requirements.

    The U.K. earlier this year also proposed its first formal regulations of the crypto industry, seeking to clamp down on practices in the wake of the collapse of FTX, a crypto exchange once worth $32 billion. Many crypto investors say this would provide more clarity, particularly as they are facing heightened uncertainty in the U.S.
    “The prime minister’s leadership is critical, but we have seen a wonderful openness to the promise of the technology, as well as a strong interest in whatever regulatory regime comes online, focusing on consumer protection,” Brian Quintenz, head of policy at Andreessen Horowitz, told CNBC in an interview.
    “Frankly, I don’t think this current administration in United States is doing either — it’s a moment in a time when the U.K. acts nimbly and quickly, but robustly.”
    Sriram Krishnan, an ex-Twitter employee who joined Andreessen Horowitz as a general partner, will relocate to London to head up the firm’s office there, Quintenz said.

    Andreessen Horowitz also plans to launch its first crypto startup school in the U.K. in a bid to identify future talent in the crypto and Web3 space. The firm launched a school to coach entrepreneurs on building blockchain and cryptocurrency companies in 2019.
    Andreessen Horowitz has been one of the most active investors in crypto and Web3, backing startups ranging from the crypto-based sports collectibles trading game Dapper Labs to nonfungible token marketplace OpenSea.
    But it has felt the chilling effects of a downturn known as “crypto winter” in the past 18 months, following major collapses such as the spectacular bankruptcy of FTX. Andreessen Horowitz was not an investor, but several rival firms, including Sequoia, were.
    The firm’s commitment to open a presence in the U.K. suggests long-term belief in the crypto market, at least outside the U.S.
    “In terms of the United States, there is tremendous uncertainty here — that’s a kind word — there’s plenty of opportunity to create more uncertainty that has not been embraced,” Quintenz told CNBC.
    “We’re seeing regulation by enforcement that does nothing to understand benefits of the technology or embrace entrepreneurs, innovators trying to build next iteration.”
    WATCH: Crypto enthusiasts want to remake the internet with ‘Web3.’ Here’s what that means More

  • in

    Updated Covid vaccines need to target XBB omicron variants this fall, FDA staff says

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration staff said updated Covid boosters should target XBB omicron subvariants for the upcoming fall and winter vaccination campaign. 
    The campaign should feature a monovalent vaccine targeting either XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, or XBB.2.3, the staff said in a briefing document. 
    A panel of external advisors to the agency will meet Thursday to recommend a strain for new Covid-19 shots to target later this year. 
    Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax will be expected to update their jabs in time for the fall once that coronavirus strain is selected.

    Syringe with Covid-19 vaccine against the XBB Variant. Fight against virus Covid-19 Coronavirus, Vaccination and immunization.
    Undefined Undefined | Istock | Getty Images

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration staff on Monday said updated Covid boosters should target XBB omicron subvariants for the upcoming fall and winter vaccination campaign. 
    The U.S. should use a monovalent vaccine targeting either XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, or XBB.2.3, collectively the dominant strains nationwide, the staff said in a briefing document. 

    related investing news

    15 hours ago

    The FDA staff made the conclusion ahead of a meeting on Thursday, when a panel of external advisors to the agency will recommend a strain for new Covid shots to target later this year. There is no set date for when the vaccination campaign will begin.
    Vaccine manufacturers will be expected to update their shots once that strain is selected.
    Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax are already developing versions of their respective vaccines targeting XBB.1.5 and other circulating variants.
    The upcoming strain selection will be crucial to those companies’ abilities to compete in the fall, when the U.S. is expected to shift vaccine distribution to the private sector. That means all three companies will start selling their updated Covid shots directly to health-care providers.
    The FDA staff’s decision comes weeks after an advisory group to the World Health Organization recommended that Covid booster shots target XBB variants. 

    Scientists have said XBB strains are some of the most immune-evasive subvariants to date.

    CNBC Health & Science

    Read CNBC’s latest health coverage:

    Those strains accounted for more than 95% of Covid cases in the U.S. as of early June, according to the FDA staff. 
    They noted that the proportion of XBB.1.5 cases is declining, but both XBB.1.16 and XBB.2.3 are “on the rise.” 
    Last year’s Covid boosters were bivalent, meaning they targeted the original strain of the virus and omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5. Those variants dominated cases nationwide last fall and winter. 
    Uptake has been sluggish. Only about 17% of the U.S. population has gotten Pfizer’s and Moderna’s bivalent boosters since they were approved in September, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More