More stories

  • in

    Advance Auto Parts shares plummet after dismal results, cuts to outlook and dividend

    Shares of Advance Auto Parts plummeted Wednesday morning after the company’s first-quarter earnings significantly missed Wall Street’s expectations.
    The company also slashed its yearly guidance and quarterly dividend.
    The auto parts supplier blamed its results and bleaker outlook on higher-than-expected costs, inflationary pressure, supply chain problems and lower, unfavorable product mix.

    Customer vehicles sit parked outside an Advance Auto Parts automotive supply store in La Grange, Kentucky.
    Luke Sharrett | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Shares of Advance Auto Parts plummeted nearly 30% during premarket trading Wednesday after the company’s first-quarter earnings significantly missed Wall Street’s expectations and executives slashed the retailer’s yearly guidance and quarterly dividend.
    The Raleigh-based auto parts supplier blamed its dismal first-quarter results and bleaker outlook on higher-than-expected costs for its professional sales, inflationary pressure, supply chain problems and lower, unfavorable product mix.

    related investing news

    2 hours ago

    The company’s earnings per share for the period came in at just 72 cents, compared with an expected $2.57 per share, according to average analyst estimates compiled by Refintiv. Its quarterly revenue of $3.42 billion slightly missed expectations of $3.43 billion.
    “We expect the competitive dynamics we faced in the first quarter to continue, resulting in a shortfall to our 2023 expectations. We have reduced our full-year guidance and our board of directors made the difficult decision to reduce our quarterly dividend,” CEO Tom Greco said in a statement.
    On Tuesday, the company declared a dividend of 25 cents per share to be paid out in July. In its prior-quarter earnings release, Advance Auto Parts declared a dividend of $1.50 per share.
    Advance Auto Parts also cut its full-year profit outlook and now expects earnings per share of between $6 and $6.50, down from a previously stated range of $10.20 to $11.20. That’s despite lowering its net sales expectations by a range of just $200 million to $300 million, signaling operational problems with margins.
    For the first quarter, the company’s net sales rose 1.3% to $3.4 billion compared to a year ago. Its gross profit declined by 2.4% to $1.5 billion.

    Net income for the period was $42.7 million, or 72 cents per share, down from $139.8 million, or, $2.28 per share, a year earlier.
    “While we anticipated the first quarter would be challenging, our results were below our expectations,” Greco said.
    This story is developing. Please check back for updates. More

  • in

    American Airlines raises profit forecast thanks to stronger demand and cheaper fuel

    American Airlines raised its adjusted earnings outlook for the second quarter.
    The carrier cited strong travel demand and lower fuel prices.
    American’s CEO is scheduled to speak at a Bernstein investor conference later Wednesday.

    An American Airlines plane takes off from the Miami International Airport on May 02, 2023 in Miami, Florida. 
    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    American Airlines raised its adjusted earnings outlook for the second quarter thanks to strong travel demand and lower fuel prices.
    Adjusted per-share earnings will come in between $1.45 and $1.65, American estimated Wednesday, up from a previous forecast of $1.20 to $1.40 per share. The Fort Worth, Texas-based airline said it’s now expecting unit revenues in the three months ending June 30 to come in 1% to 3% lower than the same period last year, an improvement from a prior forecast for a decline of as much as 4%.

    American’s shares were up more than 2% in premarket trading.
    American Airlines CEO Robert Isom is scheduled to speak at the Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference at 4:30 p.m. ET on Wednesday.
    He will likely face questions about a new preliminary labor agreement with pilots and whether the carrier will appeal a federal judge’s ruling this month that knocked down American’s partnership in the Northeast with JetBlue Airways.
    The airline is scheduled to report results for the second quarter at the end of July. More

  • in

    Not just shoplifting: Here’s why companies say retail theft is such a big deal

    Many retailers say retail theft is on the rise and is leading to lower profits.
    Retail shrink refers to the loss of inventory from a variety of factors, including employee theft, shoplifting, administrative or cashier error, damage or vendor fraud. 
    Homeland Security Investigations, the primary federal agency that tackles organized retail theft, defines the crime as “the association of two or more persons engaged in illegally obtaining items of value from retail establishments, through theft and/or fraud, as part of a criminal enterprise.”

    For several years, the terms shrink, retail crime and organized retail theft have echoed from the mouths of politicians, police officers, trade groups and the country’s most prominent retail executives.
    Politicians and police departments have sounded the alarm about rising retail theft, and are calling for stricter enforcement and prosecution to fight it. 

    Trade groups and retailers have griped about shrink’s effect on profits, and warned it could lead to store closures, employee-retention issues, safety concerns and reduced investment returns over time. 
    All of these parties have urged passage of legislation they say would better equip law enforcement officials to crack down on the growing trend and catch those responsible. 
    What is shrink, anyway? And how does it differ from retail crime and organized retail theft?
    Here’s everything you need to know about the topic. CNBC gathered this information using interviews with trade associations, retailers, law enforcement officials and publicly available records, including securities filings, survey data and transcripts from retail earnings’ calls.

    What is retail shrink?

    When retailers use the term shrink, they’re referring to the difference between inventory they’re supposed to have on their balance sheets and their actual inventory. 

    Shrink captures the loss of inventory from a variety of factors, including employee theft, shoplifting, administrative or cashier error, damage or vendor fraud. 
    For example, a retailer could have $1 billion in inventory on its balance sheet, but a count could show only $900 million in merchandise, indicating it lost $100 million in shrink. 
    But it is difficult to figure out how the items were lost. Shrink could refer to anything from expired food to a broken jar of pickles, from cosmetics that a cashier rang up incorrectly to a bottle of aspirin that was stolen and later resold online. 

    Locked up merchandise, to prevent theft in Target store, Queens, New York. 
    Lindsey Nicholson | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

    Shrink, including shoplifting and organized retail crime, cost retailers $94.5 billion in 2021, up from $90.8 billion in 2020, according to a 2021 study conducted by the National Retail Federation that used data from 63 retailers. That is the most recent data available. 
    The companies polled for the survey estimated that retail theft accounted for 37% of those losses, employee or internal theft 28.5% and process and control failures 25.7%. Unknown loss and other sources accounted for the rest. 
    However, those figures are largely estimates because of how difficult it is for retailers to figure out whether an item was stolen, lost or missing for other reasons. It’s not like thieves inform retailers about the merchandise they’re taking with them. 
    Retailers with commercial property insurance can be covered for unforeseen losses such as theft, depending on the policy. It’s unclear which retailers have such insurance and if they do, how much it covers.

    Which retailers have cited shrink and retail theft as a problem?

    For the last couple of years, retailers have blamed smaller than expected profits on retail theft, shrink and organized retail theft. And the problem hasn’t gone away this earnings season. 
    In May, Target, Dollar Tree, Home Depot, T.J. Maxx, Kohl’s and Foot Locker all cited shrink, retail theft or both as a reason for lower profits or hits to gross margins. 
    Target lost about $763 million from shrink in its last fiscal year, and said shrink is expected to shave more than $1 billion off its profits in its current fiscal year.
    Foot Locker said heavy discounting, and an uptick in retail theft, shaved 4 percentage points off its margins in the first quarter compared to the prior-year period. The hit to merchandise margins was “driven by higher promotions,” the company said. It’s not clear how big of an effect retail theft had on the results, or if promotions were the primary reason for the profit loss.
    Home Depot said its gross margins fell slightly due to “increased pressure from shrink.”
    In the past, Walmart, Best Buy, Walgreens, Lowes and CVS have all cited shrink and retail theft as an issue.
    In January, Walmart’s CEO Doug McMillon told CNBC theft is “higher” than it has been historically.  “If that’s not corrected over time, prices will be higher, and/or stores will close,” he said. 
    Still, others have said the problem has stabilized.
    Best Buy, which previously spoke out about retail theft, said shrink levels have stabilized to pre-pandemic levels. Because of the pricey electronic goods it sells, its stores were already fortified against thieves, the company said.
    In January, Walgreens’ Chief Financial Officer James Kehoe said the company’s concerns may have been overblown after shrinkage stabilized over the past year. 
    “Maybe we cried too much last year,” Kehoe said on an earnings call with investors.
    Shrinkage was about 3.5% of sales last year, but as of January, the number was closer to the “mid-twos,” said Kehoe. He also said the company would consider moving away from hiring private security guards.

    What is organized retail theft and how is it different from shoplifting?

    Homeland Security Investigations, the primary federal agency that tackles organized retail theft, defines the activity as “the association of two or more persons engaged in illegally obtaining items of value from retail establishments, through theft and/or fraud, as part of a criminal enterprise.”
    The NRF defines organized retail theft as the “large-scale theft of retail merchandise with the intent to resell the items for financial gain.” The trade group says it typically involves a criminal enterprise with multiple levels. 
    At the bottom are boosters, the people who steal items from the stores. They then turn the items over to fencers, who pay the boosters for the products for a fraction of what they cost. 

    A group robs a jewelry store, in an incident law enforcement says is an example of organized retail theft
    police handout

    Fencers then resell the items. They often sell the goods online, in informal street markets or even to other retailers. Sometimes, the products are exported to foreign countries. 
    The line between organized retail theft and shoplifting can be murky, but they are distinctly different. 
    Organized retail theft involves a larger criminal enterprise. Traditional shoplifting can often be need based or done for other reasons that don’t involve the elaborate reselling of goods in concert with others. 
    An example of retail theft, or shoplifting, could be a teenager who steals a T-shirt or an impoverished person who steals food.

    What is the impact of retail theft and why is it such a big deal these days? 

    Shoplifting and coordinated theft are old crimes, but many experts say organized retail theft has grown alongside the rise of online shopping, which has allowed groups to reach more customers. 
    In the past, fencers often offloaded stolen goods in informal places like flea markets or disreputable small retail businesses. But with the rise of online marketplaces, criminal groups now have access to broad swaths of consumers.
    After the Covid pandemic led to widespread store closures and lockdowns, e-commerce became the primary way consumers shopped, which caused organized retail theft to increase, some experts said.
    “With Covid, there were more and more consumers buying online than in brick-and-mortar stores, and so the criminal actors were seeing even more profit from their illicit activity, and so it only exacerbated the problem,” said Lisa LaBruno, the senior executive vice president of retail operations for the Retail Industry Leaders Association.
    “It keeps going back to the lack of accountability, and the massive profitability that criminal actors are experiencing as a result of the fact that they can hide behind their computer screens,” she said. 
    Organized retail theft has also increased because it can be low risk relative to other criminal ventures, such as armed robbery or drug dealing. 
    For example, the crime of petit larceny is charged in New York when an individual steals less than $1,000 worth of goods. If convicted, the defendant faces up to a year in jail. But they can also receive probation, community service and fines, in addition to restitution. 
    Further, individuals charged with petit larceny in New York are almost always automatically released after their arrest because of recent criminal justice reforms to the state’s bail law. 
    Conversely, armed robbery is a felony in New York and comes with much stiffer penalties. 

    Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg is pictured during a press conference related to reducing shoplifting Wednesday, May, 17, 2023 in Manhattan, New York.
    Barry Williams | New York Daily News | Getty Images

    Supervisory Special Agent John Willis, who is part of an organized retail theft task force out of the Homeland Security Investigations Charlotte field office, said individuals he has arrested for the practice have cited the low-risk nature of the offense as the reason for committing it.
    “I arrested some individuals when I first got here to Charlotte, who, prior to committing [organized retail crime] violations, they were drug dealers and violent criminals who spent time in both state and federal penitentiary for violent crimes and drug dealings,” Willis told CNBC. 
    “And they simply said, ‘I make more money. And if I get caught, nothing really happens to me.’ So they get out of jail and they go, ‘we learned our lesson, let’s not do drugs and hurt people, let’s just start stealing stuff,'” he said.
    Further, many retail security guards have a “hands off” approach when they witness theft, added Special Agent Willie Carswell, who is part of the same task force. Security guards are often instructed to just call law enforcement when they see a theft in progress. 
    “If a booster knows that he can go in and he can rip them off and he’s not going to encounter any type of resistance when he does it, of course the risk versus reward goes up for him. He knows that’s where he needs to be. He’s not having to steal this out of somebody’s backyard where he might get shot. He knows he can go into the store and he can rip them off,” said Carswell.

    What types of items are frequently stolen?

    The items most frequently stolen by organized theft groups tend to be the ones most in demand by shoppers.
    When consumers shop on online marketplaces such as Amazon and eBay, a few specific items have a high risk of coming from an organized theft group. 
    Over-the-counter drugs are by far the largest class of items that are stolen and resold online, and allergy medicines are the largest subgroup, law enforcement sources told CNBC. The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak on the matter.

     A customer shops for items in a Walgreens in Niles, Illinois. 
    Tim Boyle | Getty Images

    In 2022, one retailer lost $2.9 million worth of allergy medicines alone, the sources said. 
    When shopping on online marketplaces, consumers should be wary of buying Zyrtec, 60 or 90 count, Allegra and Claritin. Other OTC drugs that could be stolen goods include Prilosec, Nexium, CQ10, Advil, Tylenol and Prevagen, the sources said. 
    Currently, facial creams also are being targeted, and include items from drug store brands like Olay, Neutrogena, Roc and L’Oreal, the sources said. 
    — Additional reporting by CNBC’s Melissa Repko More

  • in

    New study pegs the median age of the world’s billionaires at 67

    While tech wunderkinds and celebrities may get the most attention, the world’s billionaires are largely aging entrepreneurs.
    The median age of the world’s billionaires is now 67, data firm Altrata said in a new report.
    Forty-two percent are over the age of 70, and fewer than 10% are under the age of 50, according to the study.

    French luxury group LVMH Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Bernard Arnault
    Eric Piermont | AFP | Getty Images

    While younger tech billionaires like Elon Musk, 51, and Mark Zuckerberg, 39, may dominate the wealth headlines, the majority of the world’s billionaires are over retirement age, according to a new study.
    The median age of the world’s 3,194 billionaires is now 67 years old, data firm Altrata said in a report released Wednesday. Forty-two percent are over the age of 70, and fewer than 10% are under the age of 50, according to the report.

    The findings highlight the wide gap between the perception and reality of the world’s billionaires.
    While tech wunderkinds and music and sports celebrities may get the most attention, the world’s billionaires are largely aging entrepreneurs, such as Warren Buffett, 92, and Bernard Arnault, 74, who spent a lifetime, or even generations, reaching the three-comma club and accumulating their wealth. According to the report, the median age of the world’s billionaires has actually increased slightly over the past five years.
    “Many of the younger billionaires have made their wealth in tech, which has been a fast wealth-creation industry and gets a lot of media attention,” said Maya Imberg, senior director and head of thought leadership and analytics at Altrata. “But most wealth takes a long time to accumulate unless it’s inherited. It takes a vast majority of their business lives to create that amount of wealth.”
    The different age groups of billionaires also have different sources of wealth. For billionaires under 50, tech and banking/finance account for the bulk their wealth creation, with 21% making their fortunes in banking/finance and 20% in tech. Billionaires between ages 50 and 70 made most of their money in banking/finance (24%) and industrial conglomerates (8.3%), while those over 70 made their billions from finance (18%), conglomerates (11%) and real estate (8.3%).
    Overall, the population of the world’s billionaires fell 3.5% in 2022, to a total of 3,194, according to Altrata. While the number of billionaires may have stabilized or even inched up slightly this year with the rising tech sector, the decline in 2022 marked the first slide since 2018, according to the report.

    North America saw a 2.3% decline, to 1,011 billionaires, while Asia saw a 7.1% decline and Europe a 2.2% decline. The U.S. still has the largest number of billionaires in the world by far, with 955, accounting for nearly one-third of the world’s billionaires. China had 357 billionaires by the end of 2022.
    Women still account for a small share of billionaires, at 12.5%, according to the report. Yet as a group they are younger than their male counterparts, with 18% of billionaires under the age of 50.
    “Diversifying global wealth markets, the growth in female entrepreneurship, slowly evolving cultural (and boardroom) attitudes and the rising frequency of substantial intergenerational wealth transfers are all contributory factors,” to the rise in younger women, according to the report.
    New York is still the top city for billionaires worldwide, with 136, according to the report. Hong Kong ranked second, with 112, followed by San Francisco (84), Moscow (76) and London (75).
    While four of the top 15 billionaires’ cities are in the U.S., Imberg said the world’s wealth is quickly spreading to other countries.
    “If you would have looked at the city list 10 years ago, it would have looked different,” she said. “Now, there are quite a few Chinese cities and non-U.S. cities on the list.” More

  • in

    ECB’s de Guindos warns financial markets are vulnerable to a sharp sell-off

    In its May Financial Stability Review published on Wednesday, the European Central Bank said the euro area’s stability outlook remained fragile in the aftermath of recent turmoil in the banking sector, which saw the failure of several U.S. regional banks and the emergency takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
    The ECB report noted that the potential for “disorderly adjustments” in financial markets had spiked against a backdrop of tighter financial conditions and lower market liquidity.

    Christine Lagarde (R), President of the European Central Bank (ECB), and Vicepresident Luis de Guindos (L)
    Thomas Lohnes | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Financial markets could face a sharp downturn in the event of any further shocks to the global economy, European Central Bank Vice-President Luis de Guindos told CNBC on Wednesday.
    Earlier on Wednesday, the ECB published its May Financial Stability Review, saying that the euro area’s stability outlook remained fragile in the aftermath of recent turmoil in the banking sector, which saw the failure of several U.S. regional banks and the emergency takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.

    Although it determined that bank resilience in a higher interest rate environment was not a concern in the euro area, with fundamentals remaining solid and regulatory intervention proving effective, the ECB said it is “possible that these events could lead to a reassessment of the profitability and liquidity outlooks for euro area banks.”
    Global stock markets made a robust start to 2023, given falling energy prices, China’s reopening and the surprising resilience of the euro zone economy — driving equity valuations back above historical averages, the ECB highlighted.
    This reversed abruptly in late February and March as a hawkish tone from central banks and unexpected stress in the banking sector roiled investors around the world. De Guindos said current market positioning rendered stocks vulnerable to any further macro surprises.
    “There is the possibility of a correction in markets, and the reason is that valuations are high, are elevated, and if you look at, for instance, risk premia, they are quite compressed, so just in case that we have bad news with respect to the macroeconomic outlook, that could give rise to a correction of markets,” de Guindos said.

    The ECB report noted that the potential for “disorderly adjustments” in financial markets had spiked against a backdrop of tighter financial conditions and lower market liquidity. The banking sector turmoil of March led to a widening of credit risk premia in the euro area, the central bank said.

    “By contrast, the fact that equity risk premia remain compressed in absolute and relative terms, especially in the United States, raises concerns over potential overvaluation. Equities may thus be more vulnerable to a disorderly price correction in the event of a further deterioration in the economic outlook,” the report said.
    “As such, risk sentiment remains fragile and is highly sensitive to surprises as regards the outlook for inflation, growth and monetary policy in mature economies.”
    This could take the form of more persistent inflationary pressures, forcing central banks into “more significant” policy tightening than the markets have currently priced in.

    There are also risks to the banking system from any fragility in non-bank financial institutions, de Guindos highlighted.
    “We indicate that interlinkages are relevant and are important, so that you cannot immunize what happens in the banking industry from the non-banking industry.”
    The ECB report said that, although the non-bank financial sector remains resilient for now, exposures to credit risk remain high, opening it to “the risk of material losses should corporate sector fundamentals deteriorate substantially.”
    “In addition, non-banks’ exposure to property markets has increased markedly in recent years, rendering institutions vulnerable to ongoing property price corrections,” it said.
    “Strong links with banks, as an important source of funding for instance, could also give rise to additional vulnerabilities in the banking sector via liquidity and credit risk spillovers.” More

  • in

    British digital bank Monzo hits monthly profitability for the first time after spike in lending

    Monzo reported net operating income of £214.5 million ($266.1 million) in the year ending February 2023, almost doubling its results year-over-year.
    One of the most prominent U.K. digital banks, Monzo managed to reach profitability in the first two months of the year.
    The bump in revenues was driven by a spike in lending activity, with net interest income increasing 382% to £164.2 million.

    A Mastercard debit card from U.K. digital bank Monzo.

    Monzo on Wednesday said it hit profitability for the first time this year, in a major milestone for one of the U.K.’s most prominent digital banks.
    In its annual report for the year ending February 2023, Monzo reported net operating income of £214.5 million ($266.1 million), almost doubling year-over-year from £114 million.

    Losses at the bank nevertheless came in at a substantial £116.3 million — though this was slightly lower than the £119 million net loss Monzo reported in 2022.
    Still, the company managed to reach profitability in the first two months of the year.
    In its annual report, Chief Financial Officer James Davies said Monzo is “now a business with diverse and stabilising revenue from a large, and growing, personal and business customer base.”
    “Profitability was always a choice as we balance continuing to invest in growth with profitability,” Monzo’s CEO, TS Anil, told CNBC in an interview. “We could have chosen to be profitable a few quarters ago.”
    Monzo is not the first digital bank to hit profitability. Starling Bank reached that milestone for the first time in 2021. Fellow fintech Allica Bank reached monthly profitability last year.

    Monzo’s move into the black was largely thanks to a substantial increase in income from newer revenue lines, such as lending and subscriptions. Paid accounts now total 350,000.
    Monzo declined to share a figure on how much of a profit it is making currently. The firm said it is on track to reach full-year profitability by the end of 2024.

    Lending growth

    Monzo’s strong revenue performance was driven by a bumper year for its lending business. This came against a backdrop of pain for U.K. consumers, who’re grappling with a harsh cost-of-living crisis as inflation soars.
    Total lending volume reached £759.7 million, almost tripling year-on-year, while net interest income spiked by 382% to £164.2 million.  That was as usage of overdrafts, unsecured personal loans, and the Monzo Flex buy now, pay later service grew sharply.
    Yet credit losses also surged dramatically, as the bank set aside a mountain of funds to deal with a sharp climb in anticipated defaults. Credit losses swelled to £101.2 million, a more than sevenfold increase from £14 million in 2022. 
    It comes as consumers are increasingly turning to unsecured credit, such as credit cards and personal loans, to offset the impact of the rising cost of living. Research from consulting firm PwC indicates U.K. household debt exceeded £2 trillion for the first time in January.
    Monzo’s boss disputed that the cost-of-living crisis had contributed to its revenue performance.
    “The cost-of-living crisis was painful for everyone, but it really underscored the ways in which the Monzo product is incredibly powerful,” Anil told CNBC. 
    He added the growing cost of living impacted how people used Monzo products, with usage of its savings pots and budgeting tools rising.
    Meanwhile, Monzo said it continues to work with the Financial Conduct Authority regulator over an ongoing inquiry into the company’s alleged breaches of anti-money laundering laws.
    “We expect it to take time to resolve,” Monzo said. “This could have a negative impact on our financial position, but we won’t know when or what the outcome will be for some time.”

    UK ‘not holding us back’

    The fintech sector has experienced increasing scrutiny since it grew in prominence after the 2020 Covid outbreak.
    Major digital banks, from Revolut to N26, are receiving heightened attention from regulators. Revolut is reportedly set to have its application for a banking license rejected by the Bank of England, according to the Telegraph.
    A number of tech bosses have expressed doubts about the U.K.’s bid to become a global tech power on the back of notable setbacks, including Cambridge-based chip design firm Arm’s decision to list in New York rather than London.
    Revolut CEO Nik Storonsky earlier this month said his firm had encountered “extreme bureaucracy” in its experience applying for a banking license in the U.K. and said he would never list in the country. Monzo co-founder Tom Blomfield, meanwhile, left London for San Francisco, citing a “much more accepting” environment for tech founders.
    “From our perspective, this is a country where we got licensed, this is our home market; we’ve clearly learned this is where we can build a business of scale,” Monzo’s Anil said. “It’s not holding us back, I don’t think of it like that at all.”
    Monzo now has 7.4 million customers in the U.K., making it the seventh-largest bank in the U.K. by client numbers. Total customer deposits now stand at £6 billion. More

  • in

    Dimon calls for Washington-Beijing engagement in first China visit since 2021 controversy

    “You’re not going to fix these things if you are just sitting across the Pacific yelling at each other, so I’m hoping we have real engagement,” Dimon said, according to Reuters.
    In November 2021, Dimon expressed “regret” over remarks that JPMorgan would last longer than China’s ruling party.

    JPMorgan Chase and Company President and CEO Jamie Dimon testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs hearing on “Annual Oversight of the Nation’s Largest Banks”, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., September 22, 2022. 
    Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

    JPMorgan Chase & Co CEO Jamie Dimon on Wednesday called for “real engagement” between policymakers in Washington and Beijing, as Sino-U.S. relations continue to fray.
    Speaking at the JPMorgan Global China Summit in Shanghai — in his first visit to China since his 2021 apology for joking that JPMorgan would outlast the Chinese Communist Party — Dimon said that security and trade disputes between the world’s two largest economies over are “resolvable.”

    “You’re not going to fix these things if you are just sitting across the Pacific yelling at each other, so I’m hoping we have real engagement,” Dimon said, according to Reuters.
    He advocated for a “de-risking” of the economic ties between the East and West rather than for a full-scale decoupling, as the Wall Street giant seeks to boost its presence in China.
    In November 2021, Dimon expressed “regret” over remarks that JPMorgan would outlast China’s ruling party, seeking to limit damage to the bank’s growth ambitions in the country. The comments that invoked Beijing’s ire came shortly after JPMorgan won regulatory approval to become the first foreign company to establish full ownership of a securities brokerage in China.
    Top U.S. and Chinese commerce officials met last week for “candid and substantive discussions” surrounding bilateral trade and commercial relations, in the first cabinet-level exchange between Washington and Beijing in months.
    National security concerns also underpin a souring of relations between the two superpowers. The U.S. on Tuesday accused a Chinese fighter jet of engaging in an “unnecessarily aggressive maneuver” while intercepting a U.S. military reconnaissance aircraft in international airspace over the South China Sea. More

  • in

    Very few U.S.-China flights are back despite the end of Covid

    Fewer than 6% of U.S. flights to and from mainland China that existed in 2019 have resumed, according to a Nomura report.
    In contrast, flights between mainland China and Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Italy are nearly back to pre-pandemic frequency or more, the report showed, citing data as of May 22 from VariFlight.
    This past weekend, an Air China flight between Beijing and New York marked the first direct passenger on the route by a Chinese carrier in months.

    BEIJING — Fewer than 6% of U.S. flights to and from mainland China that existed in 2019 have resumed, according to a Nomura report.
    In contrast, flights between mainland China and Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Italy are nearly back to pre-pandemic frequency or more, the report showed, citing data as of May 22 from Variflight.

    “We think geopolitical factors in China’s outbound tourism revival … are clearly at play here,” Nomura’s Chief China Economist Ting Lu and a team said in the report Monday.
    In March, China brokered the restoration of diplomatic ties between Middle East rivals Saudi Arabia and Iran. Beijing has refused to condemn Russia’s unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, while calling for peace talks.

    Tensions between the U.S. and China have meanwhile simmered. China’s ambassador to the U.S. assumed office last week after a gap of about six months with no one in the position.
    This past weekend, an Air China flight between Beijing and New York marked the first direct passenger on the route by a Chinese carrier in months. It was one of the four new weekly flights between the two countries by Chinese airlines that the U.S. Department of Transportation approved in May.
    Previously, the only regular direct flights by Chinese carriers between mainland China and New York since the pandemic were from Shanghai and Guangzhou. The cross-border non-stop flights also cover Los Angeles.

    Flights of Air China are parked on the tarmac of Beijing Capital International Airport in Beijing, China, March 28, 2016.
    Kim Kyung Hoon | Reuters

    In March, Delta announced it resumed direct flights between the U.S. and China — from Shanghai to Seattle and Detroit.
    Overall, mainland China’s international flights remains below 40% of 2019 levels, the Nomura report said.
    The analysts expect that level to pick up to 70% by the end of the year as international flights recover around the summer holiday season.

    Read more about China from CNBC Pro More