More stories

  • in

    American Eagle Outfitters shares plunge as retailer lowers forecast

    American Eagle Outfitters shares dropped after the retailer lowered its outlook.
    The company reported quarterly earnings and revenue in line with expectations.
    American Eagle posted disappointing results after rival Abercrombie & Fitch saw shares spike after it reported a surprise profit.

    A view of an American Eagle Outfitters store in Arlington, Virginia.
    Erin Scott | Reuters

    Shares of American Eagle Outfitters dropped Wednesday in after-hours trading, as the company lowered its full-year outlook.
    The company cut its forecast, even as it matched Wall Street’s quarterly earnings expectations and beat revenue expectations.

    The mall retailer said it now expects operating income to range between $250 million and $270 million, below the $270 million to $310 million range it had predicted in March. It said it anticipates full-year revenue to be flat to down low single-digits, lagging the flat to up single-digits it projected before.
    Sales trends slowed as the company began the second quarter, a pattern the retailer factored into its guidance. On an earnings call, Jen Foyle, the company’s executive creative director, said she hopes shoppers will buy more seasonal merchandise as Memorial Day hits and summer weather takes hold.
    Shares plunged about 14% following the company’s earnings report after the market close.
    Here’s how the company did for the three-month period that ended April 29 compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:

    Earnings per share: 17 cents, adjusted, versus 17 cents expected
    Revenue: $1.08 billion, versus $1.07 billion expected

    American Eagle, which includes its namesake brand and the Aerie brand, diverged significantly from its competitor, Abercrombie & Fitch. Earlier Wednesday, shares of Abercrombie shot up as it posted a surprise profit and raised its outlook, lifting American Eagle’s stock with it.

    American Eagle lost those earlier gains, as it reported its own quarterly results after the bell, including falling profits. Net income fell about 42% to $18.45 million, or 9 cents per share, compared with $31.74 million, or 16 cents a share, in the year-ago period.
    Total net revenue rose about 2% to $1.08 billion from the $1.06 billion it reported in the year-ago period. Store revenue rose 5%. Digital revenue dropped 4%.
    Its brands had mixed results. Aerie’s comparable sales increased 2%, but comparable sales for American Eagle’s namesake brand declined 2% compared with the year-ago period.
    American Eagle made strides with inventory levels. Many retailers, including Target, Kohl’s and others, got stuck with too much merchandise after shipments got stuck in the supply chain and consumer preferences swung away from categories popular during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Inventory declined 8% to $625 million at the end of the quarter compared to the year-ago period.
    In a news release, CEO Jay Schottenstein said the company wants to build back its operating margins and chase profitable growth. He said it is focused on “inventory discipline, cost savings and efficiencies across the business,” particularly with the tougher economic backdrop. More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves after hours: Nvidia, Snowflake, American Eagle Outfitters and more

    The logo of NVIDIA as seen at its corporate headquarters in Santa Clara, California, in May of 2022.
    Nvidia | via Reuters

    Check out the companies making headlines after hours.
    Nvidia — Nvidia shares surged 19% in extended trading. The chipmaker gave stronger-than-expected revenue guidance for the fiscal second quarter, while also reporting beats on the top and bottom lines in its fiscal first quarter. The stock has already more than doubled this year.

    Snowflake — Snowflake tumbled 11% after hours. The cloud computing company gave weaker-than-expected second-quarter product revenue guidance, according to StreetAccount. Snowflake beat analysts’ expectations for earnings and revenue in the first quarter, per Refinitiv.
    American Eagle Outfitters — Shares slid 15% after American Eagle Outfitters said it expects second-quarter revenue to fall in the low single digits, instead of up 1.6%, according to consensus expectations from Refinitiv. The clothing retailer reported a mixed quarter, with per-share earnings coming in line with estimates, while revenue beat expectations.
    Guess? — Shares popped 3% after the apparel company raised its dividend and hiked its full-year earnings and revenue guidance.
    e.l.f. Beauty — Shares of e.l.f. Beauty jumped 10% in extended trading. The cosmetics company reported fiscal fourth-quarter earnings that beat expectations on the top and bottom lines. The company reported adjusted earnings of 42 cents per share on revenue of $187 million. Analysts polled by Refinitiv expected earnings of 20 cents per share on revenue of $156 million. More

  • in

    Iconic singer Tina Turner dies at 83

    Tina Turner has died at the age of 83 after a long illness.
    In recent years, Turner had suffered ill health. She was diagnosed with intestinal cancer in 2016 and had a kidney transplant in 2017.
    The singer had a career that spanned decades.

    Tina Turner performs at Shoreline Amphitheatre in Mountain View, California, May 23, 1997.
    Tim Mosenfelder | Archive Photos | Getty Images

    Singer Tina Turner has died at the age of 83 after a long illness, according to a statement posted on her official Facebook page Wednesday.
    “It is with great sadness that we announce the passing of Tina Turner. With her music and her boundless passion for life, she enchanted millions of fans around the world and inspired the stars of tomorrow,” the statement said.”Today we say goodbye to a dear friend who leaves us all her greatest work: her music. All our heartfelt compassion goes out to her family. Tina, we will miss you dearly,” it continued.

    Widely referred to as the Queen of Rock ‘N’ Roll, Turner had a career that spanned over 60 years and included iconic songs “Proud Mary” and “What’s Love Got to Do With It.” Known for her energetic performances, signature sequins and tousled hair, Turner has won 12 Grammy awards and sold more than 100 million records worldwide.
    In recent years, Turner had suffered ill health. She was diagnosed with intestinal cancer in 2016 and had a kidney transplant in 2017.
    In a separate statement to Sky News, a spokesperson said Turner died “peacefully” at her home in Küsnacht, near Zurich, Switzerland.
    “With her, the world loses a music legend and a role model,” the spokesperson said.
    Turner was born in Brownsville, Tennessee, as Anna Mae Bullock. She lived in Switzerland mostly out of the public spotlight for the past decade.

    Tuner began her career as a teenager in the late 1950s singing backup for musician Ike Turner’s blues band Kings of Rhythm. She soon became the group’s main attraction. By 1962, she married Ike and began performing with him as a duo.However, both the marriage and ensemble came to an end in the following years, as Tina alleged Ike was abusive. She later released acclaimed solo albums such as 1984’s “Private Dancer.”
    In 2021, Tuner sold her music rights to German music company BMG. The deal included her past recordings across 10 studio albums, as well as rights to her name, image and likeness. She remained signed to record label Warner Music. 
    In the same year, Turner was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for the second time. In 1991, she was enshrined along with ex-husband Ike Turner, who died in 2007.
    At the 2021 induction ceremony, actress Angela Bassett, who portrayed Turner in a 1993 biographical film, praised the singer in a speech, and renditions of her songs were performed by artists including Keith Urban, H.E.R. and Christina Aguilera.
    Following the announcement of Turner’s death, tributes poured in for the late singer.
    “I’m so saddened by the passing of my wonderful friend Tina Turner,” tweeted Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger. “She was truly an enormously talented performer and singer. She was inspiring, warm, funny and generous. She helped me so much when I was young and I will never forget her.” More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Abercrombie & Fitch, Palo Alto Networks, Moderna and more

    Customers exit an Abercrombie & Fitch store in San Francisco.
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading.
    Citigroup — Citigroup shares fell nearly 3%. The bank announced plans to spin off its Mexico business Banamex through an initial public offering after its efforts to find a buyer for the unit failed.

    related investing news

    Palo Alto Networks — The cybersecurity company saw its shares jump nearly 8%. The action came a day after Palo Alto Networks posted a better-than-expected quarterly report and strong earnings guidance. The company reported adjusted earnings of $1.10 per share and revenue of $1.72 billion. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had estimated earnings of 93 cents per share and $1.71 billion in revenue.
    Netflix — Shares rose 1.2%. On Tuesday, the company started notifying customers of its password-sharing rules in the U.S. Oppenheimer said the crackdown on account sharing should help the stock.
    Analog Devices — Analog Devices dropped 8% in midday trading. The semiconductor manufacturing firm gave weaker-than-expected guidance for the fiscal third quarter, despite beating expectations on the top and bottom lines in its second quarter. Analog Devices expects adjusted earnings of about $2.52 per share in the third quarter, compared to analysts’ forecasts of $2.65 per share, according to FactSet. The company expects revenue of about $3.10 billion, less than the $3.16 billion estimate.
    Tesla — Shares of Elon Musk’s electric vehicle maker dipped about 2% midday. Disappointing quarterly results from Chinese rival Xpeng sent EV stocks lower. Xpeng missed estimates on revenue and posted a wider loss than analysts expected, per Refinitiv. The company also forecast a decline in vehicle deliveries.
    Energy stocks — Shares of oil companies rose Wednesday. The move came a day after Saudi Arabia’s energy minister indicated potential OPEC+ output reductions. The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) was up 0.3%. Marathon Oil and APA both gained roughly 1%.

    Semiconductor stocks — Semiconductor shares declined Wednesday. A spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Commerce spoke out against Japan’s chip export restrictions to China a day earlier. Shares of Microchip Technology were down 6%. NXP Semiconductors fell 4%, while On Semiconductor shed 3%. Nvidia also declined 2% ahead of its earnings announcement after the bell. 
    Moderna — The biotech company’s shares fell more than 4%. The drop marks a sharp reversal for the stock, which has popped in recent days amid news of the new XBB variant wave of Covid cases in China. Beijing officials reportedly estimate this could result in 65 million new weekly cases by the end of June.
    Abercrombie & Fitch — Shares of the apparel retailer soared 26% after the company reported fiscal first-quarter earnings and revenue that beat analysts’ estimates, according to Refinitiv. The apparel retailer also issued strong guidance for the fiscal second quarter and full year.
    Urban Outfitters — Shares of the retail company spiked about 16%. On Tuesday, Urban Outfitters issued a fiscal first-quarter report that beat expectations on the top and bottom lines. The company generated 56 cents in earnings per share on $1.11 billion of revenue. Analysts surveyed by Refinitiv had penciled in 35 cents of earnings per share on $1.09 billion of revenue. Barclays upgraded the stock to overweight from equal weight after the earnings report.
    Accolade — Shares jumped nearly 7% following an upgrade to buy from neutral from Bank of America. The firm said the health benefits assistance company has a “steady growth engine.”
    Stem — Stem shares climbed 5%. Evercore ISI initiated coverage of the stock with an outperform rating, saying the energy storage company is a leader in a rapidly growing market given the rise in clean energy technologies. The firm said in a Tuesday note Stem is “well-positioned to capture a significant market share,” and is a “growth story.”
    Corning — Shares gained 2% a day after Corning announced it would hike prices for its display glass products 20%. The company said the price adjustment is intended to offset ongoing high energy and material costs. Corning said it expects demand to grow in the second half of 2023. 
    Kohl’s — The retail giant got a 5% lift in its shares after it reported an unexpected first-quarter profit Wednesday and reaffirmed its full-year outlook. The company said its stores have improved productivity and noted sustained momentum at Sephora at Kohl’s.
    Agilent Technologies — Shares of the laboratory technology company declined almost 8%. On Tuesday, Agilent posted guidance for earnings and revenue in the fiscal third quarter was lower than anticipated, according to Refinitiv. However, the company posted beats on the top and bottom lines for the previous quarter.
    Intuit — The tax software company’s shares declined 7% a day after Intuit issued quarterly results. While Intuit’s fiscal third-quarter earnings came above analysts’ estimates, the company reported a revenue miss, according to Refinitiv data. The company’s earnings outlook for the current quarter also missed analysts’ expectations. 
    — CNBC’s Samantha Subin, Alex Harring, Yun Li, Brian Evans, Jesse Pound and Tanaya Macheel contributed reporting. More

  • in

    The American credit cycle is at a dangerous point

    The celebrated tome “Capital in the Twentieth Century”, by Thomas Piketty, a French economist, runs to 204,000 words—longer even than Homer’s “Odyssey”. But the book’s central argument can be distilled to a single, three-character expression: r > g. As long as “r”, the real rate of return to capital, exceeds “g”, the real rate of economic growth—as Mr Piketty calculated it did over the course of the 20th century—then inequality will supposedly widen. The simplicity of the message won Mr Piketty widespread acclaim. It also spawned a resurgence in the popularity of economic expressions. An influential one, i > g, is a variation on the Piketty rule. It applies when nominal interest rates (or risk-free returns) exceed nominal growth. The troubling conclusion from this expression applies to debt. In an i > g world, growth in revenues, wages or tax receipts that a debtor earns will be slower than the interest accumulating on their borrowing, meaning debt levels have the potential to explode.An i > g world is unfamiliar to America and most of the West. Since the end of 2009 nominal growth has been higher than nominal rates (aside from the first half of 2020, when the covid-19 pandemic crashed the economy). Now America is about to cross the threshold. In the first quarter of 2023 robust annualised real economic growth, of 4.5%, and troublesomely high inflation meant that nominal gdp rose at an annualised rate of 8.3%, easily exceeding nominal interest rates of around 5%. A panel of economists surveyed by Bloomberg, a data firm, anticipate that in the second quarter of the year growth will slip to just 0.4% and inflation to 3.3%. Nominal growth is forecast to be just 3.7%—well below nominal rates of around 5.2%. “This is when the rubber really meets the road for the economic cycle,” notes Carl Riccadonna of bnp Paribas, a bank. “This is the point at which, if you’re a business, your revenues are now growing more slowly than your cost of financing.” Wage growth will lag debt growth. Governments’ interest bills will grow faster than tax receipts. A single quarter of this might be bearable. Unfortunately, economists expect the situation to last a year or more. The precise impact depends on the extent to which debt reprices as interest rates rise. The vast majority of American homeowners have 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. This generous financing will protect them against a pincer-like combo of slowing wage growth and rising interest expenses. Nevertheless, consumers carrying other kinds of debt—including revolving credit-card balances and private student loans—will feel the pinch. Many companies carry a mix of fixed and floating-rate debt, meaning they will also be somewhat insulated. But the maturities of their debts tend to be much shorter than those of mortgages. A large portion of corporate fixed-rate debt is due to roll over in 2024. Companies that are preparing to refinance are getting nervous. Raphael Bejarano of Jefferies, an investment bank, points out that many corporate treasurers have been spooked by just how difficult it has been to issue debt over the past year. “Many of them are looking at their big maturities in 2024 and trying to roll some of that debt a little earlier, even at higher rates,” he says. What they really fear is being unable to roll their debt over at all. The most-exposed companies include many that have been recently snapped up by private-equity barons. Private-credit loans taken on by their firms’ portfolio companies tend to have floating rates. During the last major credit cycle, in 2008, many private-equity firms were able to hang on to their overleveraged acquisitions by negotiating with lenders, which were mostly banks. This time around they will be going toe-to-toe with private-credit lenders, many of which also employ hefty private-equity teams and will be more than happy to take on overleveraged firms. In a sign of what may be to come, on May 16th kkr, a giant private-assets firm, allowed Envision Healthcare, a portfolio company in which it invested $3.5bn at a $10bn valuation in 2018, to fall into bankruptcy and be seized by its lenders. When surveying this scene, it is reassuring to note interest rates have been high for some time, the American economy has fared reasonably well and even bank failures seem to have represented a flesh wound rather than a fatal one. But all of this has happened in a different context. It is far easier to swallow a high cost of capital when it is matched by high returns on said capital. And that will not be the case for much longer. ■ More

  • in

    Fed officials less confident on the need for more rate hikes, minutes show

    Federal Reserve officials were divided at their last meeting over where to go with interest rates, with some members seeing the need for more increases while others expected a slowdown in growth to remove the need to tighten further, minutes released Wednesday showed.
    Though the decision to increase the Fed’s benchmark rate by a quarter percentage point was unanimous, the meeting summary reflected disagreement over what the next move should be, with a tilt toward less aggressive policy.

    At the end, the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee voted to remove a key phrase from its post-meeting statement that had indicated “additional policy firming may be appropriate.”
    The Fed appears now to be moving toward a more data-dependent approach in which myriad factors will determine if the rate-hiking cycle continues.
    “Participants generally expressed uncertainty about how much more policy tightening may be appropriate,” the minutes said. “Many participants focused on the need to retain optionality after this meeting.”
    Essentially, the debate came down to two scenarios.
    One that was advocated by “some” members judged that progress in reducing inflation was “unacceptably slow” and would necessitate further hikes. The other, backed by “several” FOMC members, saw slowing economic growth in which “further policy firming after this meeting may not be necessary.”

    The minutes do not identify individual members nor do they quantify “some” or “several” with specific numbers. However, in Fed parlance, “some” is thought to be more than “several.” The minutes noted that members concurred inflation is “substantially elevated” relative to the central bank’s goal.

    ‘Closely monitoring incoming information’

    While the future expectations differed, there appeared to be strong agreement that a path in which the Fed has hiked rates 10 times for a total of 5 percentage points since March 2022 is no longer as certain.
    “In light of the prominent risks to the Committee’s objectives with respect to both maximum employment and price stability, participants generally noted the importance of closely monitoring incoming information and its implications for the economic outlook,” the document said.
    FOMC officials also spent some time discussing the problems in the banking industry that have seen multiple medium-sized institutions shuttered. The minutes noted that members are at the ready to use their tools to make sure the financial system has enough liquidity to cover its needs.
    At the March meeting, Fed economists had noted that the expected credit contraction from the banking stresses likely would tip the economy into recession.
    They repeated that assertion at the May meeting and said the contraction could start in the fourth quarter. They noted that if the credit tightness abated that would be an upside risk for economic growth. The minutes noted that the scenario for less impact from banking is “viewed as only a little less likely than the baseline.”
    The minutes also reflect some discussion on the talks to raise the national debt ceiling.
    “Many participants mentioned that it is essential that the debt limit be raised in a timely manner to avoid the risk of severely adverse dislocations in the financial system and the broader economy,” the summary stated.

    Markets betting May was last hike

    Release of the minutes comes amid disparate public statements from officials on where the Fed should go from here.
    Markets expect that the May rate increase will be the last of this cycle, and that the Fed could reduce rates by about a quarter percentage point before the end of the year, according to futures market pricing. That expectation comes with the assumption that the economy will slow and perhaps tip into recession while inflation comes down closer to the Fed’s 2% target.
    However, virtually all officials have expressed skepticism if not outright dismissiveness toward the likelihood of a cut this year.
    Most recently, Governor Christopher Waller said in a speech Wednesday that while the data hasn’t presented a clear case for the June rate decision, he’s inclined to think that more hikes will be needed to bring down stubbornly high inflation.
    “I do not expect the data coming in over the next couple of months will make it clear that we have reached the terminal rate,” Waller said, referring to the end point for hiking. “And I do not support stopping rate hikes unless we get clear evidence that inflation is moving down towards our 2% objective. But whether we should hike or skip at the June meeting will depend on how the data come in over the next three weeks.”
    Chair Jerome Powell weighed in last week, providing little indication he ‘s thinking about rate cuts though he said that the banking issues could negate the need for increases.
    Economic reports have shown that inflation is tracking lower though it remains well above the central bank’s goals. Core inflation as measured by the Fed’s preferred personal consumption expenditures index excluding food and energy increased 4.6% on an annual basis in March, a level it has hovered around for months.
    A bustling labor market has kept the pressure on prices, with a 3.4% unemployment rate that ties a low going back to the 1950s. Wages have been rising as well, up 4.4% from a year ago in April, and a research paper this week from former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said the trend represents the next phase in the inflation fight for his former colleagues.
    As for the broader economy, purchasing managers’ indexes from S&P Global hit a 13-month high in May, indicating that while recession could be a story later in the year, there are few signs of a contraction now. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker of economic data shows growth at a 2.9% annualized pace in the second quarter.
    Correction: In Fed parlance, “some” is thought to be more than “several.” An earlier version misstated the difference. More

  • in

    Not just Disney: DeSantis brings history of business battles to the presidential campaign

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is slated to launch his presidential campaign on Twitter during a conversation with Elon Musk.
    DeSantis will become Donald Trump’s top Republican primary rival in the race to defeat President Joe Biden.
    DeSantis champions pro-business conservativism while also engaging in culture-war populism in fights against Disney and ESG investing.

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis gives remarks at the Heritage Foundation’s 50th Anniversary Leadership Summit at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center on April 21, 2023 in National Harbor, Maryland.
    Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis officially launched his presidential campaign Wednesday, putting his blend of pro-business conservativism and culture-war populism to the test at the national level.
    DeSantis, 44, filed campaign paperwork and is set to announce his bid for the Republican presidential nomination on Twitter, during a live conversation with Elon Musk that is set for 6 p.m. ET. The announcement will cement DeSantis as the top Republican rival to former President Donald Trump, who has held a consistent polling lead over the primary field.

    DeSantis worked to establish himself as a champion of economic growth even before he pushed to quickly lift Covid lockdown policies in the name of revitalizing Florida’s ailing businesses. He has since taken credit for the state’s low unemployment rate, its population growth and its economy outpacing the national average.
    At the same time, he has plunged into political battle with some of his state’s top employers — most notably Disney — and signed legislation targeting private business practices, some of which has since been blocked in the courts.

    DeSantis apparently sees no contradiction between his pro-business posture and his heavy-handed governance. “Corporatism is not the same as free enterprise,” he said in a speech last September, “and I think too many Republicans have viewed limited government to basically mean whatever is best for corporate America is how we want to do the economy.”
    But some experts expressed skepticism about the governor’s tightrope walk.
    “The Disney case sort of exemplifies this tension in DeSantis as a candidate,” said David Primo, a professor of political science and business administration at the University of Rochester. “There’s this hydra-like element to what he’s trying to do.”

    A spokesman for DeSantis’ campaign-in-waiting did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    DeSantis’ rise

    DeSantis himself has little business experience. A Yale- and Harvard-educated lawyer, he joined the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps and served at Guantanamo Bay and in Iraq. He worked as an attorney after his active-duty service ended in 2010, and in 2012 was elected to Congress. Once there, he quickly established himself as a member of the far-right Tea Party movement.
    DeSantis was the lead sponsor of 52 bills in Congress, none of which became law, Spectrum News reported. One of them was the “Drain the Swamp Act,” aimed to realize Trump’s campaign slogan by strengthening lobbying bans on officials after they leave government service.
    A founding member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, DeSantis also introduced legislation that would axe the payroll tax for retirement-age Americans, and he backed another bill to replace most federal taxes with a national sales tax. Critics say such proposals, which popped up again in Congress this year, would burden low- and middle-income Americans.
    DeSantis resigned from Congress to run for governor in 2018 and, buoyed by an endorsement from Trump, narrowly defeated his Democratic opponent, Andrew Gillum. DeSantis’ aspirations for higher office were apparent among his loyalists that same year, Politico reported.
    “He seemed to be like a mainstream Republican — pro-business, very conservative on social and economic issues,” said J. Edwin Benton, a professor of political science at the University of South Florida.
    “And all of a sudden he had the ambition to become president. And to do so he knew he had to carve out a niche for himself.”

    Covid breakthrough

    DeSantis seized the national spotlight during the coronavirus pandemic in September 2020, when he lifted all of Florida’s social distancing restrictions on restaurants, bars and other businesses.

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis gives an update on the state’s response to the coronavirus pandemic during a press conference at Florida’s Turnpike Turkey Lake Service Plaza, in Orlando, Friday, July 10, 2020.
    Joe Burbank | Orlando Sentinel | Getty Images

    He also acquired more power for himself. By the following May, DeSantis had lifted all local Covid restrictions. Six months later, the governor banned private employers from imposing vaccine mandates.
    Along the way, DeSantis held that his actions were aimed at protecting Florida businesses’ freedoms.
    “Nobody should lose their job due to heavy-handed COVID mandates and we had a responsibility to protect the livelihoods of the people of Florida,” he said in a November 2021 press release.
    DeSantis’ stance clashed with public health experts’ views at the time and drew heavy criticism, especially after Florida weathered record-breaking waves of Covid cases and deaths in 2021. But while the state suffered the third-highest number of Covid deaths in the country, its death rate per 100,000 people was lower than in states with much stricter lockdown rules, such as New York and New Jersey, per New York Times data.
    DeSantis has claimed victory, making his Covid response a key piece of what he now calls the “Florida Blueprint” for economic success.

    Business culture

    Even in the midst of the pandemic, DeSantis and his allies had trained their sights on other polarizing social issues that roped in Florida businesses.
    In 2020, he quietly signed controversial legislation that required some private companies to use the E-Verify system to check employees’ immigration status. He strengthened those rules earlier this month, signing a bill that makes E-Verify mandatory for any employer with 25 or more employees.
    In 2021, DeSantis signed a law that allowed Florida to punish large social media companies, such as Facebook and Twitter, that banned political candidates. The legislation came months after those and other companies kicked Trump off their platforms in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. A federal appeals court has since ruled that the social media law is unconstitutional.
    In the most recent legislative session, DeSantis signed a bill that stopped union dues from being automatically deducted from public employees’ paychecks. The Florida Education Association accused DeSantis of punishing them for opposing his policies, and critics have been quick to point out that the bill does not apply to unions representing first responders. Police and firefighters’ unions had endorsed DeSantis’ reelection bid.

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a critic of environmentally sensitive investing, didn’t succeed in protecting his constituents from the ravages of Hurricane Ian, which may have been intensified by global warming.
    Joe Burbank | Orlando Sentinel | Getty Images

    DeSantis has also waged war against socially conscious ESG investing strategies, decrying the trend in his latest book as “an attempt to impose ruling class ideology on society through publicly traded companies and asset management.”
    ESG, a broad concept that generally refers to investing strategies that prioritize environmental, social and governance factors, has become a prime target for conservatives seeking to root out progressive influence in corporate culture.
    DeSantis signed a bill in early May barring state and local officials from making ESG-based investment decisions. It was only his latest action against ESG.
    The ESG moves played into the governor’s argument against corporate influence and favoritism — themes he would employ again in his ongoing fight against Disney.

    The Disney saga

    Apparel promoting Florida Governor Ron DeSantis sit on a table before a book tour event at the North Charleston Coliseum on April 19, 2023 in North Charleston, South Carolina. 
    Sean Rayford | Getty Images

    The battle centers on legislation banning classroom discussion of sexual orientation or gender identity in grades K-3. Critics, who also noted the bill’s vague language could apply to older students, have nicknamed it “Don’t Say Gay.”
    Among those critics was Bob Iger, Disney’s current CEO, who was not leading the company when he tweeted in February 2022 that the bill “will put vulnerable, young LGBTQ people in jeopardy.” Disney’s then-CEO Bob Chapek came out against the bill less than two weeks later and announced donations to pro-LGBTQ rights organizations. After the bill was signed, Disney vowed to help repeal the law.
    DeSantis and his allies soon after targeted Disney’s special tax district, an arrangement that since the 1960s has allowed the company to effectively self-govern its Orlando-area parks. In April 2022, DeSantis signed a bill to dissolve the governing body, formerly known as the Reedy Creek Improvement District.
    The move set off fears that the neighboring counties would be on the hook for the district’s expenses and debts. In February, the Florida legislature convened a special session and produced a bill that kept the district intact, but changed its name — and let DeSantis handpick its five-member board of supervisors.
    The next month, the governor’s board members accused Disney of sneaking through 11th-hour development deals to thwart their power over the district. Disney says it followed the correct process in crafting those deals, and that it sought them in order to protect its investments in Florida amid the politically uncertain landscape.
    The board voted to nullify those development contracts. Iger, who returned as Disney’s CEO in November, noted in a recent earnings call that other Florida companies also operate within special districts.
    Disney sued Florida, accusing DeSantis of orchestrating a “targeted campaign of government retaliation” that now threatens the company’s business. The law was “designed to target Disney and Disney alone,” the company said in its federal civil suit. The board has countersued in state court.
    The fight shows no signs of stopping, and returns to the spotlight with each new business update from Disney, such as the company’s recent announcement scrapping plans to build an employee campus in Florida.
    The ESG and Disney fights “reflect ways for DeSantis to appeal to that populist base while at the same time keeping the general thrust of Florida policy very business friendly,” Primo, the political science professor, told CNBC.
    He’s “banking on being able to do both,” Primo said. More

  • in

    Here’s why TSA PreCheck makes sense during a busy travel season — if you can get it in time

    TSA PreCheck and Global Entry are federal “trusted traveler” programs that generally speed up wait times at airport security or customs lines.
    The programs have received a record number of membership applications and enrollment wait times have increased in some cases, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
    They make sense for frequent travelers, especially during busy periods, but aren’t for everyone, experts said.

    Izusek | E+ | Getty Images

    The 2023 summer travel season is expected to be a busy one, making federal programs like TSA PreCheck especially helpful for flyers, according to experts.
    Such programs carry fees but generally save travelers time at the airport. However, relatively long processing times — as with recent passport applications — mean it may be difficult for some new applicants to take advantage before traveling this summer.

    “You have so many people wanting to travel now, especially after the pandemic,” said Sofia Markovich, a travel advisor and founder of Sofia’s Travel. “It’s just like passport renewal, where there have been these huge delays.”
    That said, programs like TSA PreCheck and Global Entry are “definitely worth it” for frequent flyers, she added.
    More from Personal Finance:Travel costs fell in April. The dip may be short-livedMissing one $2 expense could derail a whole national park tripTravel to Europe is no longer a ‘ bargain-basement’ deal
    “They make sense all year round, but especially when it’s the busy season,” Markovich said.
    TSA PreCheck aims to cut down the screening time in airports. Travelers wait in a different — and often shorter — line from the standard security line. In April, 94% of PreCheck passengers waited less than five minutes at the security checkpoint, according to the Transportation Security Administration.

    The agency aims for wait times of 10 minutes or less with PreCheck, and 30 minutes for typical lanes.
    TSA PreCheck — available for departures from certain U.S. airports — costs $78 for new enrollees. A membership lasts five years, and renewals cost $70.

    The upfront fee for new members amounts to $15.60 a year. Several credit cards cover the fee as a customer perk.
    Aside from a potentially shorter security line, there’s also a convenience factor, experts said.
    Since the application entails a passenger risk assessment — including fingerprinting for a background check — members don’t have to remove their shoes, belts or light jackets when going through airport security. They can also keep electronics and “3-1-1” compliant liquids in carry-on bags. (The 3-1-1 rule allows each passenger to carry one one-quart-sized bag’s worth of bottled liquids weighing no more than 3.4 ounces apiece in their hand luggage.)
    “It’s pretty tough for most people to argue against that,” Sally French, a travel expert at NerdWallet, said of the fee. “It’ll alleviate so much stress down the road.”
    PreCheck is one of a handful of “trusted traveler” programs offered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in partnership with other federal agencies.

    Among the other programs is Global Entry, which offers expedited U.S. customs screening when returning from a trip abroad. A five-year membership carries a $100 nonrefundable fee and includes TSA PreCheck.

    When the programs may not make sense

    There are some instances in which the programs — and their fees — may not make sense for travelers, experts said.
    The programs are most cost-effective for people who travel frequently, for example. The TSA recommends Global Entry for people who travel internationally four or more times a year.
    TSA PreCheck also doesn’t guarantee that travelers will save time, experts said. The standard security line could be the shorter one, depending on the airport and departure time.
    TSA PreCheck and Global Entry applications for first-timers may also be somewhat cumbersome, experts said. That’s largely due to the necessity of an in-person assessment. Appointments — especially those for Global Entry — aren’t always easy to get and may require an out-of-the-way visit (perhaps to an airport) to complete.

    You have so many people wanting to travel now, especially after the pandemic.

    Sofia Markovich
    founder of Sofia’s Travel

    Global Entry application processing times can also take four to six months, according to the DHS. In 2022, the average time to enroll for Global Entry was 93 days, the department said.
    Longer wait times are due to a record number of applications for membership in the trusted traveler programs, according to the DHS. Google search traffic for “TSA Precheck” is around its highest level in five years.
    Most TSA PreCheck applicants must complete an online application, and get approved within three to five days of their in-person enrollment appointment, on average. However, it can take 60 days or longer, the TSA said. (As of Feb. 1, U.S. Customs and Border Protection began releasing interview appointment slots for enrollment centers on the first Monday of every month by 9 a.m. local time, according to the DHS.)
    TSA PreCheck also isn’t available at all airports or airlines. It’s currently available at more than 200 airports and via more than 85 participating airlines, according to the TSA.

    If a traveler’s home airport doesn’t have it — most likely to happen at a small regional facility — it may not be worth the time and expense, French said.
    Travelers have another program option called Clear if they’re worried about not getting approved for TSA PreCheck in time for a trip, French said.
    Clear, run by a private company and not a government-affiliated program, expedites the identity verification portion of security screening by using a retina or fingerprint scan. (This differs from TSA PreCheck. Clear members must still remove shoes, belts, electronics during the physical screening process, unless they also have TSA PreCheck.)
    A membership is more costly — $189 a year though discounts are available to certain travelers. Travelers can enroll at the airport, typically within a few minutes. More