More stories

  • in

    A new chapter for space travel and an anniversary for Nato

    Hello and welcome to the working week,As TS Eliot wrote in his poem “The Waste Land”, “April is the cruellest month”. I say this not just because this week is the start of the UK tax year, but also because the centenary of what was one of the 20th century’s most important poems is being celebrated in London’s financial centre from this Thursday with a festival across 22 City churches.It is hard to be optimistic about world events at the moment. What will happen in Ukraine? That’s impossible to predict. But there will be a lot more meetings, firstly between foreign ministers of the member states of Nato, which by coincidence commemorates its 73rd birthday this Monday. There will also be a gathering of EU finance ministers for the Ecofin conference, whose agenda includes trying to assess the economic impact of the conflict. Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky continues his (virtual) tour of western parliaments to rally support — this week addressing the elected chambers of Dublin and Athens. Another coincidental anniversary: this Thursday is the seventh anniversary of the declaration of the Donetsk People’s Republic as a breakaway region from Ukraine.Are there any reasons to be cheerful? Well, there will be some firsts for space travel this week. On Monday, Nasa will hold a press conference to discuss the final test stages — called a “wet dress rehearsal” — for its Artemis 1 rocket. The Artemis programme aims to return astronauts to the Moon and establish a long-term lunar colony as a precursor to human exploration of Mars.Then on Wednesday, Axiom (or Ax-1), the first all-private astronaut rocket mission to the International Space Station, is due to launch from Nasa’s Kennedy space centre in Florida.As the week draws to a close, democracy in western Europe will be in the spotlight with the first round of voting in the French presidential election on Sunday. Not so long ago it could be said that none of the 11 challengers looked close to unseating incumbent Emmanuel Macron, but he now warns that he could lose the election to the far right. The fear is that Macron’s overwhelming success in the polls will foster voter apathy and a festering disillusionment with centrist politicians, as this excellent Big Read explains. You will be able to get the latest updates on the French polls by clicking here. You can also cast your vote on The Week Ahead by sending me an email at [email protected] — I remain open to suggestions about what to include and leave out. Thank you for your comments.Economic dataThe thoughts of central bankers on the inflation conundrum will become a little clearer this week with the publication of the minutes from the last Federal Reserve meeting.IHS/Markit will provide some international comparisons on productivity, services and manufacturing with the publication of its purchasing managers’ index data for Europe, Asia and the US.CompaniesWe are between earnings seasons, so the main corporate diary events this week are annual general meetings, notably Nokia — which recently reinstated its dividend — on Tuesday, UBS on Wednesday and Rio Tinto on Friday.Key economic and company reportsHere is a more complete list of what to expect in terms of company reports and economic data this week.MondayCanada, Bank of Canada publishes its Business Outlook SurveyEU, industrial producer pricesGermany, February trade balance figuresUK, Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey speaks at the Stop Scams Conference, and Jon Cunliffe, deputy governor, gives a talk at the European Economics & Financial CentreUS, February factory orders dataTuesdayAustralia, Reserve Bank of Australia’s monthly monetary policy meetingEurozone, France, Germany, Italy, UK, US: IHS/Markit services and composite (manufacturing and services) purchasing managers’ index (PMI) dataNokia AGMSouth Korea, March inflation figuresWednesdayAsia, China, EU, France, Germany, Global, UK: IHS/Markit productivity, services and construction PMI figuresEU, European Central Bank (ECB) publishes quarterly financial statementsGermany, February factory order and consumer goods statisticsRussia, consumer price index (CPI) figuresSweden, February gross domestic product dataTeliaSonera AGMUBS AGMUK, British Retail Consortium NielsenIQ March Shop Price IndexUS, Federal Open Market Committee publishes minutes of its March meetingThursdayEU, the ECB’s monetary policy accounts plus eurozone February retail sales dataGermany, February industrial production figuresUK, Office for National Statistics quarterly productivity figures, plus Halifax March house price index. Bank of England chief economist Huw Pill gives the opening remarks at the bank’s 8th International Conference on Sovereign Bond MarketsFridayCanada, March unemployment dataCMC Markets pre-close full-year updateFrance, industrial production figuresItaly, February retail sales dataJapan, February trade balance figuresNorway, February GDP dataRio Tinto AGMSaturdayChina, March CPI and producer price index dataWorld eventsFinally, here is a rundown of other events and milestones this week. Monday73rd anniversary of the foundation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato), created with the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty in WashingtonUS, Nasa holds a media teleconference to discuss the final major test of its Mega Moon rocket and spacecraft Artemis 1TuesdayEU, Ecofin Council of economic and finance ministers meets in Luxembourg. The agenda includes agreeing a general approach on a global minimum tax level of not less than 15 per cent for large multinational corporations, plus there will be a discussion on the economic and financial aspects of the war in UkraineJapan, ban on the export of high-end cars and other luxury goods to Russia comes into forceWednesdayBelgium, Nato foreign ministers will gather in Brussels for a meeting of the North Atlantic Council, chaired by Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg.They will be joined on Thursday by the foreign ministers of Australia, Finland, Georgia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Sweden and Ukraine, plus the EU high representative for foreign affairsIreland, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky will give a virtual address to a joint sitting of both houses of parliament in DublinUK, Start of the 2022/23 tax year. The threshold at which people begin to pay income tax was set by chancellor Rishi Sunak at £12,570, and £50,270 in April 2021, and will be frozen for five yearsUK, Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 comes into force, allowing married couples to divorce without assigning blameUS, Axiom (or Ax-1), the first all-private astronaut mission to the International Space Station, is due to launch from Nasa’s Kennedy space centre in Florida ThursdayWorld Health Day when the World Health Organization publishes its annual World Health ReportUkraine, seventh anniversary of the declaration of the Donetsk People’s Republic.Greece, Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky gives an online address to the parliament in AthensUK, the England and Wales County Championship cricket season beginsUS Masters golf tournament begins at the Augusta National Golf Club, GeorgiaFridayUK, ballot closes among members of the University and College Union (UCU) on settlement for pensions, pay and conditions to avoid further strike action during the end-of-year exam seasonSaturdayGeorgia, Day of National Unity commemorating the Tbilisi tragedy in 1989, when Soviet army attempts to disperse demonstrators resulted in at least 20 deathsUK, 174th Grand National takes place at Aintree Racecourse, LiverpoolSundayFrance, first round of the country’s presidential electionIsrael, Palm Sunday is marked at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in JerusalemSouth Caucasus, presidential election in South OssetiaFinally, this week sees the launch of Working It, a new newsletter from work & careers editor Isabel Berwick on the big ideas shaping today’s workplaces, from the future of hybrid work to the effects of the Great Reshuffle. Sign up here. More

  • in

    The future of the UK economy is uncertain

    In the past 15 years, the UK’s economy has been buffeted by three huge external shocks — the financial crisis, Covid-19 and now the Russia-Ukraine war — and one domestically generated one, Brexit. We are buffeted by surprises whose implications are unknown, even unknowable.It took a long time, for example, to realise that the financial crisis marked a sharp turning point in trend productivity growth. Yet, as the Resolution Foundation notes in its evaluation of the Spring Statement from Rishi Sunak, chancellor of the exchequer, “labour productivity grew by only 0.4 per cent a year over 2007-19, one of the slowest rates among rich countries, and much slower than the approximately 2 per cent rate in the preceding 12 years”.

    You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

    This, in turn, explains the near-stagnation in household real disposable incomes that has preceded the exceptional squeeze expected this year. But why this happened is still unknown. Again, it was predictable that Brexit would make the economy less open to trade. The extent to which it will also end up making the economy permanently less productive is still unknown.Similarly, we know today’s shock has followed on the heels of a large and mostly unexpected post-Covid surge in inflation. We know it will squeeze the real incomes of the less well off particularly brutally. But the full economic ramifications of the war are unclear.

    You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

    The Office for Budget Responsibility has, however, made a heroic guess. This helps us to clarify some painful possibilities. The OBR forecasts that this new shock will drive inflation to close to 9 per cent this year, which will be the highest rate in 40 years. Similar surges in inflation are happening in other high-income countries. This increase is driven primarily by higher gas and fuel prices, along with a global rise in the prices of manufactured goods. The OBR also expects that excess demand in the domestic economy will ensure that these increased costs will be passed into consumer prices. But it assumes they will only be partly matched with higher nominal wage growth: in brief, real wages will fall significantly.Crucially, this inflation upsurge is expected to be temporary. The OBR forecasts that inflation will fall sharply next year, as the current high prices become the baseline for future calculations. This outcome depends, however, on the belief that nominal wages will lag well behind inflation. Yet this assumption is made despite confidence that the labour market will stay strong and unemployment low. Furthermore, the bank rate is forecast to peak at below 2 per cent, which implies highly negative real rates, throughout. In sum, we will see a combination of falling real wages with a strong labour market and an expansionary monetary policy. The economy might easily end up far weaker than the OBR envisages. Monetary policy could be far tighter; for example, if inflation did not fall. Alternatively, the squeeze on real incomes might reduce demand and output substantially, without the need for higher interest rates. Either option would mean a far weaker economy. An embargo on gas exports from Russia would make that outcome more likely. The economy would then suffer stagflation.What role should policy and policymakers play in all this? The Bank of England’s job remains what it is meant to be: to get inflation back down to target and so stabilise expectations. It must do so. The chancellor’s job is far more complex. He is right to want to preserve his room for fiscal manoeuvre. But, according to the Resolution Foundation, policy changes so far have offset only one-third of the income shock that would have hit the poorer half of the population in 2022-23. Given what is now happening and the squeezes on real income ahead, he will surely need to cushion the short-term blows on poorer households more effectively than he has so far.Yet a still bigger point can be seen. In tough times, a country needs trusted people in charge. Questions about the prime minister are evident. At the beginning of the pandemic, Sunak and the Treasury responded impressively. Recently, however, notably in his Spring Statement, he has claimed to be cutting taxes when he is raising them (in part by freezing tax thresholds in nominal terms). He has also been substituting bad taxes (national insurance) for better ones (income tax). Sunak, asserts Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, “has proved to be something of a fiscal illusionist”.Indeed, he has and not just “something” of one. People will notice the extent of the illusions in their pay packets and real disposable incomes. He is burning his credibility. This will be bad for him and bad for the [email protected] Follow Martin Wolf with myFT and on Twitter More

  • in

    Fed’s Daly says case for half-point rate rise in May has grown

    The case for a half-point interest rate increase at the Federal Reserve’s next policy meeting in May has grown, according to Mary Daly, president of the US central bank’s San Francisco branch, in the latest sign that it is readying aggressive moves to root out high inflation. Daly joins an expanding group of Fed officials who have jettisoned a gradual approach to scaling back support for the economy in the aftermath of the pandemic-induced recession. They have embraced a more rapid withdrawal as the labour market has bounded back and price pressures have become far-reaching.Support has coalesced in recent weeks for interest rates to rise to a “neutral” level that neither aids nor constrains growth, and to get there more quickly than initially expected by moving in larger increments than the quarter-point rate increase delivered in March. That entails resurrecting a tool last used more than two decades ago and raising rates by half a percentage point at one or more meetings this year. “The case for 50, barring any negative surprise between now and the next meeting, has grown,” said Daly in an interview with the Financial Times on Friday. “I’m more confident that taking these early adjustments would be appropriate.”Estimating the neutral policy rate to be between 2.3 per cent and 2.5 per cent, and advocating for getting to that level “efficiently” this year, Daly acknowledged that that translates to “multiple” half-point adjustments given the target range of between 0.25 per cent and 0.50 per cent.Following signals from some of the most senior policymakers on the Federal Open Market Committee in recent weeks — including Jay Powell, the chair — Wall Street economists have raised their forecasts for interest rates. They now expect the central bank to follow through with half-point moves in May and June before downshifting to quarter-point rate rises for the four remaining meetings after that.Citigroup thinks the Fed could even go so far as to deliver half-point increases at its next four meetings, taking their cue from several officials who have endorsed moving rates above neutral this year. Most economists expect the Fed to begin shrinking its $9tn balance sheet next month.Daly’s comments follow the release of another strong jobs report that showed 431,000 positions added in March and the unemployment rate dropping to the lowest level since before the pandemic, to 3.6 per cent.

    Daly said the latest data fortifies the view that the labour market is “very strong” and “tight to an unsustainable level”.“If you want a job in the United States, you can get one and you can probably get multiple jobs at this point,” she said. “If you’re an employer looking for workers, it’s hard to both hire them and retain them.”While the combination of a labour market that has no “slack” and inflation that is running at the fastest pace in 40 years justifies moving towards neutral, Daly said the Fed would proceed carefully enough to avoid an “unforced error” that destabilises financial markets or the broader economy.Fed officials so far appear confident in their ability to damp demand and tame inflation without causing widespread job losses or a recession. Powell spoke optimistically about achieving this soft landing at his most recent public appearance last month.Daly acknowledged the economy may need to slow considerably in order to bring inflation back in line with the central bank’s 2 per cent target. But she drew a distinction to the 1970s, when then-chair Paul Volcker’s efforts to control surging prices and tether inflation expectations caused a sharp economic contraction.“Our job really is to just bring demand and supply back into balance, and that’s an easier job than trying to reset the inflation anchor to something more consistent with price stability,” she said. “I’m very optimistic that we can avoid a hard landing.” More

  • in

    Biden doing more harm to renewables than Trump, says solar boss

    America’s biggest solar farm builder has accused Joe Biden of doing more harm to the sector than the Trump administration with a “dysfunctional” climate policy.George Hershman, chief executive of Solv Energy, said a probe launched by the US commerce department this week into whether solar groups are dodging import tariffs threatened to put the breaks on new projects and derail the president’s climate agenda.“The Biden administration, and particularly this commerce [department’s] decision, has done more damage to renewables than the previous administration,” said Hershman, whose company is the top installer of large, or “utility-scale”, solar projects in the US

    “At least we knew where that administration [Trump] stood. This administration every day says how much they are in support of renewables but then actively make decisions in opposition.”His comments come after the Department of Commerce on Tuesday agreed to investigate whether solar parts manufacturers were circumventing tariffs on Chinese imports by shifting the final stages of the manufacturing process to Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.Analysts estimate about three-quarters of US solar product imports come from these four countries. The probe was requested by a domestic panel maker, California-based Auxin Solar, which argued that Chinese suppliers were guilty of “pervasive backdoor dumping” that was hurting American manufacturers. If the investigation finds the practices amount to circumvention, decade-old tariffs on Chinese imports would be extended to these countries, increasing costs by between 50 and 250 per cent. A final decision is expected early next year but the tariffs would apply retroactively from April. Solar groups said the launch of the probe alone had “chilled” the market, with manufacturers reluctant to ship parts that might later be hit by tariffs.The case highlights a tension between the Biden administration’s priorities on climate and industry. On one hand the White House wants to drive a rapid build out of clean energy infrastructure, but on the other wants to protect domestic manufacturing and employment. “It’s a bit dysfunctional, it’s a bit schizophrenic,” said Hershman. His comments echo those of offshore wind developers, who have voiced concern that forcing the industry to “Buy American” before a domestic supply chain is fully developed will stop it in its tracks.Biden campaigned on an ambitious climate agenda, but the legislation that would have implemented the bulk of it failed to pass muster in Congress. The bill included unprecedented tax incentives for renewable developers and manufacturers. “We will build US manufacturing if we pass this bill, no question. But we’re not going to be pushing major capacity out for two years,” said Hershman. “Right now we need to use the global supply chain that’s in place and then begin the transition to a US supply chain.”Auxin dismissed this, however, arguing US a ramp-up of domestic parts supply was feasible. “The same companies that are saying that there is not sufficient domestic supply are not even attempting to purchase from domestic sources,” said Mamun Rashid, Auxin chief executive. “We have available capacity and with sufficient purchase orders, we can quickly scale up. But we need a fair price that allows us to cover our costs and pay our employees a fair wage.” More

  • in

    Have surging oil prices stoked Turkish inflation even further?

    Did Turkish inflation hit a 20-year high in March?Surging global energy prices probably propelled Turkish inflation to its fastest rate in two decades in March, but President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s fixation on low interest rates means the central bank remains loath to respond with tighter monetary policy.The bank has slashed its benchmark rate by a cumulative 500 basis points since September after Erdogan, a self-described “enemy of interest”, ordered policymakers to lower borrowing rates to fuel economic growth ahead of a 2023 general election. In the months since September’s rate cut, the lira has tumbled 40 per cent against the dollar, setting off an inflation spiral.Economists polled by Reuters expect official data, due April 4, to show that consumer prices rose by an annual 61.6 per cent in March.A sharp rise in commodity prices triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has only made the pain worse. The state energy importer Botas on Friday raised natural gas prices for households by 35 per cent and for companies by 50 per cent. Turkey imports almost all of the oil and natural gas it consumes.Despite signs that inflation will accelerate further, the central bank has indicated it believes price increases will slow once the crisis in Ukraine is resolved.Some analysts remain cautious. “Turkey was dealing with inflation and a weak currency well before the war, and even if it were to end tomorrow, it will take time for Russia’s sanctions to be lifted and supply chains to return to normal,” said Enver Erkan, chief economist at Tera Securities in Istanbul. Still, the central bank “is avoiding inflation targeting as long it can”, he said. “The government doesn’t want a rate rise a year before elections nor to make any concession on economic growth.”Erdogan has said the tenets of Islam, which prohibits usury, now guide his economic policy and vowed the weaker lira will increase exports, expand manufacturing and create new jobs.Prices last rose this fast in March 2002 just before Erdogan’s Justice and Development party swept to power on a platform of sound economic management.But the pain Turkish households are feeling as groceries, utilities and medicine soar has eroded support for Erdogan’s party to its lowest level since it came to office. Ayla Jean YackleyWhat will the Fed’s minutes say about supersized rate rises?Market participants will be looking to Wednesday’s release of the Federal Reserve’s minutes from its March meeting for clues about how aggressive the central bank is willing to be to curb inflation. Of particular interest will be any discussion about the Fed starting to shrink its $9tn balance sheet, by either allowing its US government debt holdings to mature without replacing them or by actively selling the securities. Fed chair Jay Powell has signalled that the Fed may be prepared to announce a decision about quantitative tightening (QT) as soon as May. One major question to be answered is about the pace of QT — the “caps” on the amount of debt that are allowed to mature each month. While the prospect of QT has been priced in by the market to a degree, discussion about large caps or an otherwise aggressive approach could push Treasuries lower, as the market braces for a fresh wave of supply. The market will also be looking for any signals about the possibility of 0.5 percentage point interest rate rises. The futures market is currently pricing in one supersized rate rise at the Fed’s May meeting, and at least one other this year. What, if anything, the Fed said at its meeting about 0.5 percentage point raises may not change market expectations dramatically. Chair Jay Powell in the days after the March meeting said that if the Fed decided it was appropriate to raise rates by more than a quarter point, it would do so. Following Powell’s remarks, other Fed officials came forward to echo his sentiments. Kate DuguidHas the latest Covid-19 outbreak damped China’s loan growth?Growth in new yuan loans — a measure of the total value of loans given by banks in China to businesses and consumers — slowed by more than expected in February, rising by just Rmb1.23tn compared with economists’ forecasts of Rmb1.49tn. The shortfall has put pressure on authorities to take further action to support the economy.Analysts at BNP Paribas predict that new loans for March will rise to Rmb2.9tn. But with about 120 Chinese cities affected by China’s biggest Covid-19 outbreak since the pandemic began, the figure for March – due out on April 8 – carries a downside risk, said Xingdong Chen, chief China economist at the French bank.“Because between growth and Covid control, local government to me is taking Covid control as a priority,” Chen said. “That is unfortunate.”Chen said that while banks and local authorities had funds to disperse, China’s latest purchasing managers’ index data, which showed a contraction in both the manufacturing and service sectors of the economy for the first time in almost two years on Thursday, suggested that demand for loans may have flagged in March.“[So] local governments are under pressure to speed up ongoing projects and [to find] new projects to start . . . [but] we are not actually too optimistic about this part,” Chen added. Going forward, the question is whether China’s snap lockdowns, including one in the commercial centre of Shanghai, will be enough to quickly bring the outbreaks under control and unleash pent-up demand.“April may be improving because of the sequential, seasonal demand,” said Chen. “[But] the real performance and the more normal performance will wait until May.” William Langley More

  • in

    China to cut paper and wood tariffs from New Zealand from April 7

    The move follows the deal signed by the two governments in January to upgrade their existing free trade pact, allowing 99% of New Zealand’s $3 billion wood and paper trade to China to receive tariff-free access over a 10-year implementation period.Import tariffs for products such as toilet or facial tissue stock and paper used for writing will be reduced to 6.8% and 4.5% from April 7 from current rates of 7.5% and 5%, respectively, and will be gradually cut over the next 10 years to reach zero.”2022 marks the 50th anniversary of the diplomatic relations between China and New Zealand and April 7th is the 14th anniversary of the signing of the China-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (FTA),” the finance ministry said in the statement.”The implementation of the agreed tariff rates will further promote trade and investment between the two countries.”China has eliminated or reduced tariffs on 75 wood and paper tariff lines for New Zealand products since the existing FTA entered into force in 2008. More

  • in

    Fed's Williams: Pace of rate increases depends on how economy responds

    PRINCETON, N.J. (Reuters) -The Federal Reserve needs to move monetary policy towards a more neutral stance, but the pace at which it tightens credit will depend on how the economy reacts, New York Fed President John Williams said Saturday.Williams, in response to questions at a symposium about whether the Fed needed to hasten its return to a neutral policy rate that neither encourages or discourages spending, noted that in 2019 with rates set near the neutral level “the economic expansion started to slow,” and the Fed resorted to rate cuts.”We need to get closer to neutral but we need to watch the whole way,” Williams said. “There is no question that is the direction we are moving. Exactly how quickly we do that depends on the circumstances.”Williams’ remarks suggest a more cautious approach to coming rate increases than has been pushed by colleagues who feel the Fed should race towards a more neutral stance by using larger than usual half-point rate hikes at upcoming meetings. The median policymaker estimate of the neutral rate is 2.4%, a level that traders currently feel the central bank will hit by the end of this year. Such a pace would require half point increases at 2 of the Fed’s remaining six meetings this year, with expectations of a first coming at the Fed’s May 3-4 session.The Fed raised interest rates last month by a quarter of a percentage point, the beginning of what policymakers expect to be “ongoing increases” aimed to tame inflation currently running at triple the Fed’s 2% target.At the last Fed meeting the median policymaker projected quarter-point increases only at each meeting, but several since then have said they were prepared to move more aggressively if needed.The outcome depends on whether inflation eases, Williams said.”We expect inflation to come down but if it does not….we will have to respond. My hope right now is that won’t happen,” Williams said.The Fed will also be using a second tool to tighten credit when it starts to reduce the size of its nearly $9 trillion balance sheet. Williams said that could begin as soon as May.In prepared remarks to a Princeton University symposium Williams said high inflation was currently the Fed’s “greatest challenge,” and is potentially being driven higher by the war in Ukraine, the ongoing pandemic, and continued labor and supply shortages in the United States.”Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains extraordinarily high, and risks to the inflation outlook are particularly acute,” Williams said. However, he said he expected the combination of rate increases and balance sheet reduction to help ease inflation to around 4% this year, and “close to our 2 percent longer-run goal in 2024″ while keeping the economy on track.”These actions should enable us to manage the proverbial soft landing in a way that maintains a sustained strong economy and labor market,” Williams said. “Both are well positioned to withstand tighter monetary policy.” More

  • in

    Williams: Must watch how economy responds as it presses toward neutral rate

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Federal Reserve will need to keep a careful eye on how the economy reacts as it raises interest rates, and scale the pace of its rate increases accordingly, New York Fed President John Williams said on Saturday.Williams, citing events in 2019 when the economy slowed as the Fed approached a neutral rate, said “the experience from that is that we have to move to a more normal level but make sure we are assessing and evaluating…There is no question that is the direction we are moving. Exactly how quickly we do that depends on the circumstances.” More