More stories

  • in

    Gaza Debate Reopens Divisions Between Left-Wing Workers and Union Leaders

    Last week’s Democratic National Convention surfaced differences over the war in Gaza that could widen fissures between labor activists and union officials.When members of the Chicago Teachers Union showed up to march at the Democratic National Convention last week, many expressed two distinct frustrations.The first was over the war in Gaza, which they blamed for chewing up billions of dollars in aid to Israel that they said could be better spent on students, in addition to a staggering loss of life. The second was disappointment with their parent union, the American Federation of Teachers, which they felt should go further in pressuring the Biden administration to rein in Israel’s military campaign.“I was disappointed in the resolution on Israel and Palestine because it didn’t call for an end to armed shipments,” said Kirstin Roberts, a preschool teacher who attended the protest, alluding to a statement that the parent union endorsed at its convention in July.Since last fall, many rank-and-file union members have been outspoken in their criticism of Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks, in which Hamas-led militants killed more than 1,000 people and took about 250 hostages. The leaders of many national unions have appeared more cautious, at times emphasizing the precipitating role of Hamas.“We were very careful about what a moral stance was and also what the implications of every word we wrote was,” the president of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, said of the resolution her union recently adopted.In some ways, this divide reflects tensions over Israel and Gaza that exist within many institutions — like academia, the media and government.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Is economics in need of trustbusting?

    $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

  • in

    USTR delays final determination on China tariffs, announcement due in coming days

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Biden administration on Friday again delayed an announcement of its final determinations for steep U.S. tariff hikes on Chinese-made electric vehicles, batteries, semiconductors and solar cells, saying it will make a decision public in the coming days.A spokesman for the U.S. Trade Representative’s Office said the agency “continues to develop the final determination regarding proposed modifications” to tariffs on Chinese goods imposed under then-President Donald Trump in 2018 and 2019.The statement came shortly after White House National Security adviser Jake Sullivan returned to Washington after several days of talks with senior Chinese officials in Beijing, including a meeting on Thursday with Chinese President Xi Jinping where both sides emphasized the need to manage the U.S.-China relationship.”USTR continues to develop the final determination regarding proposed modifications of the actions in the Section 301 investigation of the People’s Republic of China’s Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation,” an agency spokesperson said in a statement.”As USTR continues this work, we expect to make the final determination public in the coming days,” the spokesperson said.Initially, the higher duties of 100% on EVs, 50% on semiconductors and solar cells, and 25% on lithium-ion batteries and key minerals, steel and aluminum, ship-to-shore cranes and syringes were due to take effect on Aug. 1.But the agency on July 30 delayed implementation until sometime in September, saying it needed more time to study more than 1,100 public comments from industry. It set a new deadline of Aug. 31, which was further delayed by Friday’s announcement.Whether to ease the tariffs is the administration’s first major trade decision since Vice President Kamala Harris emerged as the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee after President Joe Biden stepped aside in late July. Dialing back the duties is likely to draw criticism from Republicans that Harris is taking a softer stance on China trade in a campaign where Trump has vowed to hit Chinese imports with tariffs of up to 60%. But many industries and some members of Congress have raised concerns about higher costs. EV battery makers, including Ford Motor (NYSE:F) Co, urged USTR to ease the proposed 25% duty on graphite used in battery anodes because they are currently still too dependent on Chinese supplies. Port operators said their costs for Chinese cranes under contract would rise, and there are no U.S. producers of the giant port cranes. More

  • in

    Libya central bank showdown risks spiralling into wider crisis

    (Reuters) – A struggle to control the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) has already sparked a blockade of oil production and it threatens the worst crisis in years for the major energy exporter, long torn between rival eastern and western factions.The standoff was triggered when western factions moved this month to oust veteran governor Sadiq al-Kabir and replace him with a rival board, leading eastern factions to shut down all oil production. So tangled is the situation that while Kabir retains control of the central bank’s website, a rival board appointed by the presidency council is issuing statements on the bank’s verified Facebook (NASDAQ:META) page. Kabir, who travelled abroad as the crisis unfolded, was quoted in the Financial Times on Friday saying “militias are threatening and terrifying bank staff and are sometimes abducting their children and relatives”.The central bank has been paralysed by the brinkmanship, leaving it unable to conduct transactions for more than a week, threatening basic economic functions, and neither side looks able to back down, making violence more likely by the day.Any move to resolve things peacefully will be complicated by a landscape fractured into rival governing institutions with tenuous claims to legitimacy, operating with few agreed rules and backed by a shifting constellation of armed factions. Worse still, the crisis comes at a moment when international diplomacy to resolve Libya’s underlying political standoff has stalled, with the post of U.N. envoy vacant and no sign yet of foreign powers managing to rein in the rival factions. “The equilibrium of the last two years has gone. Actors are now trying to build new leverage. So the crisis is set to get much worse,” said Jalel Harchaoui of the Royal United Services Institute.     POWER STRUGGLEKabir has been Libya’s central banker since the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that plunged the country into chaos, becoming a major player among the warlords and politicians endlessly jostling for power. As the state crumbled between rival factions, the CBL and National Oil Corporation (NOC), the state energy producer, were held off limits, ensuring some governmental functions continued. Libyan law, buttressed by international agreements, ruled that oil could be sold only by NOC, with revenue channelled into the CBL where it was used to fund state salaries and government bodies across the country.   This principle began to erode in 2022 when Prime Minister Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah installed a new NOC head in an apparent accommodation with eastern factions, leading to looser controls over the oil sector. However, Dbeibah and Kabir fell out over spending and other issues, and the CBL governor was seen as moving closer to Khalifa Haftar, the military commander who controls eastern Libya. By moving to replace Kabir, Presidency Council head Mohammed al-Menfi, backed by Dbeibah, has put control over Libya’s vast financial resources directly into play and neither side can easily back down.”My overall view is that this is a political issue rather than a bureaucratic one. But it is extremely serious. Without consensus, the country’s strongest remaining institution could effectively be hollowed out,” said Tim Eaton (NYSE:ETN) of Chatham House.        The announced dismissal of Kabir also appeared to run counter to the 2015 Libyan Political Agreement, the basis for the international community’s dealings with Libyan factions for nearly a decade. Gaining international acceptance for a bank governor is crucial. Libyan oil revenue accruing to NOC is paid in dollars into its account at the Libyan Foreign Bank in New York before moving to the Tripoli government’s account with the CBL. BLOCKADESo far, the new board announced by Menfi appears unable to control CBL functions. At a news conference on Wednesday it appealed to Kabir to surrender codes that would allow it to make transfers. It has urged Libyan banks to pay state salaries from their own reserves, promising to repay them when it gains full control over transactions. Kabir responded with a statement on the CBL website telling banks to ignore instructions from people “impersonating” board members.If the struggle for control is prolonged, all state salaries, transfers between banks and letters of credit needed for imports will all become impossible, freezing up the economy and Libya’s international trade. At two banks in eastern Libya, employees said clearing operations to banks in the west had stopped, along with processing of foreign remittances. State salary payments had stopped. Meanwhile, the eastern side’s oil blockade will gradually starve the CBL of new funds, as well as reducing condensate available for power plants, meaning long electricity blackouts may soon return. This all adds up to a miserable outlook for Libyans and raises the risk that armed factions could resort once again to fighting, some four years after a ceasefire ended the last major bout of warfare.  More

  • in

    ECB would be “wise” to cut rates in September, Villeroy says

    Inflation in the euro zone fell to its lowest level in three years in August, clocking in at 2.2% this month, according to preliminary figures published on Friday.”Unfortunately, our growth remains too weak. The balance of risks still needs to be monitored in Europe,” Villeroy told French magazine Le Point in an interview released on Friday, adding: “It would be fair and wise to decide in favour of a new rate cut.”Villeroy, who is also governor of the French central bank, said inflation would likely settle in line with the ECB’s 2% target in the first half of next year in France and in the second half of 2025 in the broader euro zone.But if the ECB waited to reach its 2% inflation target to cut interest rates, it would act too late and then run the risk of undershooting, he added.Villeroy also said that financial markets’ expectations that ECB rates would fall to 2%-2.5% next year currently appeared “reasonable” to him. More

  • in

    Rich countries tilt the scales when it comes to aid

    $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

  • in

    Russia’s ‘overheating’ economy to slow sharply next year, says central bank

    $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

  • in

    The Fed’s favorite inflation indicator increased 0.2% in July, as expected

    Core personal consumption expenditures prices increased 0.2% in July and 2.6% from a year ago. The 12-month figure was slightly softer than the 2.7% estimate.
    All-item inflation came in respectively at 0.2% and 2.5%, in line with forecasts.
    Personal income increased 0.3%, slightly higher than the 0.2% estimate, while consumer spending rose 0.5%, in line with the forecast.

    Inflation edged higher in July, according to a measure favored by the Federal Reserve as the central bank prepares to enact its first interest rate reduction in more than four years.
    The Commerce Department reported Friday that the personal consumption expenditures price index rose 0.2% on the month and was up 2.5% from the same period a year ago, exactly in line with the Dow Jones consensus estimates.

    Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core PCE also increased 0.2% for the month but was up 2.6% from a year ago. The 12-month figure was slightly softer than the 2.7% estimate.
    Fed officials tend to focus more on the core reading as a better gauge of long-run trends. Both core and headline inflation on a 12-month basis were the same as in June.
    Core prices less housing increased just 0.1% on the month. As other inflation components ease, shelter has proven to be stubborn, again rising 0.4% in July, according to Friday’s report.
    Elsewhere in the report, the department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis said personal income increased 0.3%, slightly higher than the 0.2% estimate, while consumer spending rose 0.5%, in line with the forecast. Spending continued at a solid clip even though the personal savings rate fell to 2.9%, the lowest since June 2022.
    From a prices standpoint, inflation changed little over the past month. The BEA said that goods prices fell by less than 0.1% though services increased 0.2%.

    On a 12-month basis, goods also were off by less than 0.1%, while services jumped 3.7%. Food prices were up 1.4% and energy accelerated 1.9%.
    Markets reacted little to the news, with equity futures pointing to a slightly higher open on Wall Street and Treasury yields higher as well.
    The report comes with the markets pricing in a 100% chance of a rate cut in September, with the only uncertainty being whether the Fed will take the incremental step of lowering benchmark rates by a quarter percentage point or being more aggressive and moving a half-point lower.
    In recent days, policymakers such as Chair Jerome Powell have expressed confidence that inflation is progressing back to the Fed’s 2% goal.
    The Fed is expected now to switch from a nearly complete focus on bringing down inflation to at least an equal concentration on supporting the labor market. Though the unemployment rate is still low at 4.3%, it has been trending higher over the past year, and surveys suggest a slowdown in hiring and a perception among workers that jobs are getting tougher to come by.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More