More stories

  • in

    Trump’s pressure on Europe to slap 100% tariffs on India and China raises eyebrows

    Trump reportedly asked the EU to impose tariffs on China and India to punish them for buying Russian oil.
    The EU is likely to be highly wary of agreeing to do so.
    A European Commission spokesperson told CNBC Wednesday that it does not “disclose details of such meetings due to the need for confidentiality.”

    TU.S. President Donald Trump and President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen shake hands as they announce a US-EU trade deal after a meeting at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 27, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland.
    Andrew Harnik | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Reports that U.S. President Donald Trump asked the European Union to slap tariffs of up to 100% on China and India for their Russian oil purchases has raised eyebrows on both sides of the Atlantic, with Europe seen as unlikely to acquiesce to the White House’s request.
    Trump made the proposal — first reported by the Financial Times and confirmed to CNBC by two sources familiar with the matter — when he was called into a meeting with senior U.S. and EU officials in Washington on Tuesday. The U.S. was also prepared to “mirror” any tariffs imposed by Europe on the two countries, the FT’s report added. The White House has yet to respond to CNBC’s request for comments.

    Asked to comment on Trump’s bid, a European Commission spokesperson told CNBC Wednesday it could not disclose meeting details due to confidentiality, noting, “The EU has engaged with all relevant global partners, including India and China, in the context of its sanctions enforcement efforts. This engagement will continue.”
    The commission pointed to its 19th measures package its preparing against Moscow, saying it had “added new sanctions tools which allow us to target circumvention through third countries” and that the U.S. was a “crucially important partner” in Brussels’ efforts to pile pressure on Russia’s war economy.

    Timing

    Asking the EU to impose tariffs on key Russian energy clients India and China was seen as another way to punish their trade with Moscow and put pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine.
    Yet European officials appear wary of alienating China and India, and the timing of Trump’s request has raised eyebrows because it Washington is negotiating a trade deal with New Delhi.

    FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 13, 2025.
    Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

    The U.S. has already imposed a 50% tariff on India, which includes a 25% punitive duty it for its Russian oil purchases. India says the tariffs are “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,” while calling out the U.S. and the EU’s trade with Russia.

    Ian Bremmer, founder of Eurasia Group, told CNBC Wednesday that the White House’s latest demand on the EU was “hard to square with Trump’s efforts to get to a trade deal with India and China, which he prioritizes over getting a ceasefire in Ukraine (let alone things like Transatlantic collective security and deterrence),” Bremmer said in emailed comments to CNBC.
    “It looks more like an attempt to shift responsibility for a stronger response to Europe, creating political cover for American inaction on the sanctions front while avoiding a direct hit to U.S.-China relations.”

    ‘Europe should say no’

    The EU is unlikely to acquiesce, analysts say. Not only would the bloc be wary of adopting Trump’s contentious tariffs strategy and burning its own bridges with India and China — despite an economic rivalry with the Asian superpowers — but the EU has its own complicated trading relationship with Russia.
    “Everyone knows if the Europeans haven’t been able to wean themselves off Russian energy themselves more than 3.5 years into the war, they sure as hell aren’t going to cut themselves off from their top goods import supplier,” Eurasia Group’s Bremmer stated.

    U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin before a joint news conference following their meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, U.S., August 15, 2025.
    Gavriil Grigorov | Via Reuters

    Other analysts noted that Europe, unlike Trump, has an aversion to imposing tariffs as part of a trade playbook, arguing that the bloc shouldn’t be drawn into his trade wars.
    “No one in Europe believes tariffs are an effective trade policy tool … Europe would prefer diplomacy to address issues, rather than outright trade war,” Bill Blain, market strategist and founder of London-based Wind Shift Capital, said in his Morning Porridge newsletter on Wednesday.
    “Europe’s response should be ‘no.’ Trump kicked the hornets nest – let him deal with the consequences. But let’s see what happens,” Blain concluded.

    Russia connection

    The EU has a complicated trading relationship with Russia. This is likely to prevent the bloc from punishing other nations for doing business with Moscow, when the EU does so too — albeit at a far lower level than before the Ukraine war began in 2022.
    The EU’s bilateral trade with its neighbor stood at 67.5 billion euros ($78.1 billion) in 2024, according to European Commission data, with the EU’s imports were worth 35.9 billion euros and dominated by fuel and mining products. EU exports to Russia totaled 31.5 billion euros in 2024.
    The EU has struggled to wean itself off Russian gas and LNG (liquefied natural gas) imports completely. Russia’s share of EU imports of pipeline gas dropped from over 40% in 2021 to about 11.6% in 2024, while Moscow accounted for less than 19% of total EU pipeline gas and LNG imports in 2024, the commission’s data notes.
    The U.S. has encouraged its European allies to switch to U.S. LNG.
    Trump said the EU had pledged, as part of its framework trade deal with the U.S. — which saw 15% tariffs imposed on the bloc’s exports to the States — to purchase U.S. LNG, oil and nuclear energy products with an expected offtake valued at $750 billion over the next three years.
    U.S. Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum told CNBC Wednesday that the Trump administration is looking to drive up the U.S.’ market share of the energy sector in Europe.

    “[Exporting] LNG would be one of the easiest things, [you can] put it on a ship, send it over here. Displace Russian gas, drive their market share to zero in Europe and drive U.S. market share up. That’s great for America, great for our allies, and we stop funding Russia’s side of the war,” he told CNBC at Gastech 2025. More

  • in

    Misplaced trust in tariff revenues

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More

  • in

    Japan confronts the increased price of US friendship

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More

  • in

    Mexico to slap 50% tariff on Chinese cars under US pressure

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More

  • in

    5 takeaways from the producer price inflation report with another key reading on tap

    Customers look over clothing items displayed on April 18, 2025 at a Costco branch in Niantic, Connecticut.
    Robert Nickelsberg | Getty Images

    The producer price index, a gauge of costs at the wholesale level in the U.S. economy, posted an unexpected 0.1% decline in August. Here’s what to know:

    For the third time this year, the PPI showed outright deflation in what is generally considered a measure of pipeline price pressures. Wall Street economists had been looking for a 0.3% increase. The core PPI, which strips out food and energy, also fell 0.1% though core minus trade services actually rose 0.3%
    The tame reading will only feed market expectations of a Federal Reserve rate cut next week, and President Donald Trump was quickly on the case. “Just out: No Inflation!!! ‘Too Late’ must lower the RATE, BIG, right now. Powell is a total disaster, who doesn’t have a clue!!!” he posted on Truth Social in his latest shot at Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
    Despite the tame inflation and near certainty of a rate cut, market reaction was muted. Stocks rose slightly and Treasury yields moved only modestly lower. The PPI is generally not considered a high-profile or well-understood metric, and traders are likely waiting for the consumer price index print Thursday.
    Fed officials look not only at headline numbers but also the underlying drivers. The PPI report provided good news on inflation fundamentals. The services sector, which drives some 80% of GDP, saw outright deflation, falling 0.2%. Even goods prices, which are much more heavily impacted by tariffs, rose just 0.1%.
    The CPI reading, due Thursday at 8:30 a.m. ET, will get more attention. As with the PPI, the consensus outlook is for a 0.3% increase. About four-fifths of the CPI and PPI numbers feed into the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, the personal consumption expenditures price index. The CPI is the final big data point before the Fed’s rate decision a week from now.

    What they’re saying:

    “Tomorrow’s CPI will carry more weight, but today’s PPI print essentially rolled out the red carpet for a Fed rate cut next week. After last week’s jobs report, though, the market was already expecting the Fed to begin an easing cycle, so it remains to be seen how much of a near-term impact this will have on sentiment” — Chris Larkin, managing director, trading and investing, E-Trade from Morgan Stanley.

    “The worst-case scenario on inflation isn’t playing out. The doves will be happy to see the year-over-year number back below 3 percent. Combined with the weak jobs data recently, this keeps us on track for rate cuts. However the speed and intensity might depend more on the big consumer index tomorrow morning.” — David Russell, global head of market strategy at TradeStation.
    “Inflationary pressure in PPI appears to be muted overall. … We see nothing in this report (or its implications for core PCE) that would dissuade Fed officials from cutting 25bp in September and proceeding to cut 25bp at each upcoming policy meeting.” — Citigroup economist Andrew Hollenhorst.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    US wholesale prices declined unexpectedly in August

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More

  • in

    Wholesale prices unexpectedly declined 0.1% in August, as Fed rate decision looms

    The producer price index fell 0.1% in August, after a downwardly revised 0.7% increase in July and well off the Dow Jones estimate for a 0.3% rise.
    The release provides breathing room for the Federal Reserve to approve an interest rate cut at its meeting next week.
    Services prices, a key metric for the Fed when evaluating the stance of monetary policy, posted a 0.2% drop.

    People shop for dairy products at a supermarket in Monterey Park, California on September 9, 2025.
    Frederic J. Brown | Afp | Getty Images

    Wholesale prices surprisingly fell slightly in August, providing breathing room for the Federal Reserve to approve an interest rate cut at its meeting this month, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report Wednesday.
    The producer price index, which measures input costs across a broad array of goods and services, dropped 0.1% for the month, after a downwardly revised 0.7% increase in July and well off the Dow Jones estimate for a 0.3% rise. On a 12-month basis, the headline PPI saw a 2.6% gain.

    The core PPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also was off 0.1% after being expected to climb 0.3% as well. Excluding food, energy and trade, the PPI posted a 0.3% gain and was up 2.8% from a year ago.

    Stock market futures gained after the release while Treasury yields were slightly negative.
    The release comes a week ahead of when the central bank’s Federal Open Market Committee releases its decision on its key overnight borrowing rate.
    Futures market pricing implies a 100% probability that the committee will approve its first rate cut since December 2024, though the PPI release and a consumer price reading Thursday are being watched closely for indications of whether policymakers will follow through. Odds for a larger half percentage point reduction increased slightly after the PPI release to about 10%, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch gauge.
    Services prices, a key metric for the Fed when evaluating the stance of monetary policy, posted a 0.2% drop, helping drive wholesale inflation lower. A 1.7% slide in prices for trade services was the primary impetus, with margins for machinery and vehicle wholesaling tumbling 3.9%.

    Goods prices did increase, but just 0.1% as core prices rose 0.3%. While final demand food costs were up 0.1%, energy was off 0.4%.

    “Net, net, the inflation shock that was not is rocketing markets higher as inflation barely has a heartbeat at the producer level which shows the tariff effect is not boosting across-the-board price pressures yet,” said Chris Rupkey, chief economist at Fwdbonds. “There is almost nothing to stop an interest rate cut from coming now.”
    Though inflation remains well above the Fed’s 2% target, officials have expressed confidence that easing housing and wage pressures will push prices lower, if only gradually.
    The Fed has resisted rate cuts this year as officials monitor the impact from President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariffs against U.S. imports. Tariffs historically have not been a lasting cause of inflation, but the broad-based nature of Trump’s moves have raised concern that this episode could be different.
    Tobacco products, which are impacted by tariffs, jumped 2.3% in August. Portfolio management costs, a significant factor in the July increase, rose 2% after climbing 5.8% the prior month.
    For his part, Trump has badgered the Fed to reduce rates, insisting that tariffs will not be inflationary and the economy needs lower rates both to spur growth and to cap financing costs for the swelling national debt.
    Concerns have been rising at the Fed over the employment picture while inflation fears have abated. A BLS report Tuesday indicating that the economy created nearly 1 million fewer jobs than initially reported in the year preceding March 2025 raised worries that the labor market is in trouble even as Fed officials consistently have characterized the picture as “solid.”
    The Fed meeting next week will feature both a rate decision and an update on where officials see the economy and interest rates headed in the future.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    The knotty real history of Fed ‘independence’

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More