More stories

  • in

    Cramer's lightning round: I have no catalyst to recommend SoFi

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    It’s that time again! “Mad Money” host Jim Cramer rings the lightning round bell, which means he’s giving his answers to callers’ stock questions at rapid speed.

    Loading chart…

    Oasis Petroleum Inc: “Everybody hates oil so much, we’ve got to do more work. But I like the idea in principle.”

    Loading chart…

    Cloudflare Inc: “I don’t like companies that aren’t making money, but I think [CEO] Matthew Prince should come on the show because they are doing so well.”

    Loading chart…

    MP Materials Corp: “It has been a good stock to buy in the $20s and it’s almost there. May I suggest you do that.”

    Loading chart…

    Dow Inc: “I think you buy it in the $40s.”

    Loading chart…

    Loading chart…

    Loading chart…

    SoFi Technologies: “I do not understand it. It’s at $5. That makes no sense to me. … That said, I have no catalyst to recommend the stock.”

    Loading chart…

    Danaos Corp: “I can’t recommend this stock.”
    Disclosure: Cramer’s Charitable Trust owns shares of Disney and Morgan Stanley.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Jim Cramer says investors should eye these three tech names in the Nasdaq 100

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Tuesday told investors his three stock picks from the worst- and best-performing stocks in the Nasdaq 100 during the first half of this year.
    “Tech’s become absolutely hated, maybe so hated that I think we could see a serious bounce,” he said.

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Tuesday told investors his three stock picks from the worst- and best-performing stocks in the Nasdaq 100 during the first half of this year.
    “Tech stocks were horrendous in the first half. … No Apples, no Googles, no semis, no software as services – just default names that show you that tech’s become absolutely hated, maybe so hated that I think we could see a serious bounce,” he said.

    “When it comes to tech, FANG went into a portfolio manager-induced coma in the first half and Netflix was the first to be put under. What else is there to say, except that if any stock has fallen hard enough … then there’s certainly hope for a resuscitation,” he added, referring to his acronym for Facebook-parent Meta, Amazon, Netflix and Google-parent Alphabet.
    To illustrate his point, the “Mad Money” host listed the five worst and five best performers in the Nasdaq 100. 
    Out of the 10 names, he highlighted two stocks as potential buys.
    Here is his list of the top five best performers in the Nasdaq 100:

    Vertex Pharmaceuticals
    Activision Blizzard
    T-Mobile
    Constellation Energy
    Seagen

    Out of these names, Cramer said that he thinks investors should buy shares of Seagen, especially given speculation that Merck could make a bid for the biotech company, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    T-Mobile is also a buy, he said, predicting that the company will have a great performance in its next quarter.
    Next, Cramer went over the five worst performers in the Nasdaq 100. 
    Here is his list:

    Netflix
    Align Technology
    PayPal
    DocuSign
    Okta

    Cramer said that he believes Align is attractive at its current price. “I think it can make a slow and steady comeback,” he said.
    Disclosure: Cramer’s Charitable Trust owns shares of Alphabet, Amazon and Meta.
    Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer’s every move in the market.
    Disclaimer

    Questions for Cramer?Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC
    Want to take a deep dive into Cramer’s world? Hit him up!Mad Money Twitter – Jim Cramer Twitter – Facebook – Instagram
    Questions, comments, suggestions for the “Mad Money” website? [email protected]

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Jim Cramer picks 7 Dow stocks that investors should consider owning

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Tuesday offered investors his stock picks from the best- and worst-performing stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average during the first half of the year.
    Companies in the Dow “tend to be boring, mature companies that typically pay nice dividends, which is what protects you when the Fed is tightening,” the “Mad Money” host said.

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Tuesday offered investors his stock picks from the best- and worst-performing stocks in the Dow Jones Industrial Average during the first half of the year.
    Companies in the Dow “tend to be boring, mature companies that typically pay nice dividends, which is what protects you when the Fed is tightening,” the “Mad Money” host said.

    “I know this is a tough market, but I’m betting the second half turns out better than the first for the worst performers and be OK for the best performers,” he added.
    Here is his list of the five worst-performing names in the Dow — all of which Cramer believes investors should be eyeing.

    Disney: Cramer said he is optimistic about the stock’s future.
    Nike: He said that he believes investors should start building a position in the stock now.
    Salesforce: Investors should snap up shares of Salesforce before its Dreamforce conference this fall, where the company conducts “a ton of business,” he said.
    Home Depot: Cramer said that he believes the stock has a compelling long-term story, but investors might be able to get a better price for the stock later down the line.
    Cisco Systems: The stock looks tempting at its current price, which means the Charitable Trust is going to hold on to its shares of the company, according to Cramer.

    Next, here is his list of the top five best-performing names in the Dow, with explanations for the stocks he gave investors his blessing to buy:

    Chevron
    Merck: Cramer said the company is recession-proof, reports consistent earnings and has “juicy” dividends, which makes its stock worthy of investors’ cash — unless rates continue to go down.
    Amgen
    Travelers
    Coca-Cola: The company has a bright future ahead of it now that its supply chain costs are coming down, Cramer said.

    Disclosure: Cramer’s Charitable Trust owns shares of Chevron, Cisco, Disney and Salesforce.
    Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer’s every move in the market.

    Disclaimer

    Questions for Cramer?Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC
    Want to take a deep dive into Cramer’s world? Hit him up!Mad Money Twitter – Jim Cramer Twitter – Facebook – Instagram
    Questions, comments, suggestions for the “Mad Money” website? [email protected]

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Cramer says investors shouldn’t fear market declines and instead look for buying opportunities

    Monday – Friday, 6:00 – 7:00 PM ET

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Tuesday said that investors shouldn’t fear the market’s declines now that interest rates are coming down since that means there are buying opportunities.
    “You can’t have it both ways. You can’t be scared of higher rates and lower rates,” the “Mad Money” host said.

    CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Tuesday said that investors shouldn’t fear the market’s declines now that interest rates are coming down since that means there are buying opportunities.
    “You can’t have it both ways. You can’t be scared of higher rates and lower rates. History says we should like lower interest rates. … And, of course, it’s a sign that the Fed is winning its war against inflation after a couple of aggressive rate hikes,” the “Mad Money” host said.

    “So should we hate this market or learn to love it? Wrong question. Perhaps, we should like the stocks that now sell at historically, even record-breaking low valuations,” he added.
    U.S. stocks concluded a rough end to the first half of the year in June. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield and the two-year yield inverted on Tuesday — a sign that historically indicates a recession is looming. When short-term Treasury yields are above long-term yields, it suggests that investors believe an economic slowdown will result in interest rate cuts.
    Tech stocks rose on Tuesday while stocks associated with economic growth fell. Oil also tumbled, with the U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate dropping below $100 a barrel. 
    Cramer said that instead of bemoaning the market’s downturn, investors should see it as a buying opportunity.
    “We can’t act like there have been no declines. … In fact, with the collapse of the oils, there’s no group left that hasn’t been savaged,” he said. “That may be enough to justify thinking more positively about this entire now-despised asset class, too. Funny thing about stocks — they do still get cheaper as they go lower.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    'Minions' vs. 'Lightyear:' Here's why the silly yellow blobs beat Buzz at the box office

    In just three days, Universal and Illumination’s “Minions: The Rise of Gru” tallied more than $107 million in domestic ticket sales and topped $200 million globally.
    Its rival, Disney and Pixar’s “Lightyear,” has generated just $105 million domestically since its release three weeks ago and has struggled to reach $190 million worldwide.
    So why did “Minions” soar and “Lightyear” flop? It comes down to storytelling and target audience, box office analysts say.

    Buzz Lightyear and Minion
    Source: Getty Images

    Two blockbuster animated franchises went head-to-head at the box office this past weekend. One of them benefited from buzz — and it wasn’t “Lightyear.”
    In just three days, Universal and Illumination’s “Minions: The Rise of Gru” tallied more than $107 million in domestic ticket sales and topped $200 million globally.

    Its rival, Disney and Pixar’s “Lightyear,” has generated just $105 million domestically since it was released three weeks ago and has struggled to reach $190 million worldwide.
    They are among the most popular and profitable franchises for their respective studios, having each raked in billions of dollars in ticket sales over the last decade.
    So why did “Minions” soar this year and “Lightyear” flop?
    It comes down to storytelling and target audience, box office analysts say.
    “The relatively soft response to ‘Lightyear’ by audiences and their unbridled excitement for ‘Minions: The Rise of Gru’ reflects many different factors, not the least of which is that the films are polar opposites in terms of their approach to delivering a story to the audience,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore.

    While “Minions” leaned heavily into the slapstick comedy that made the last four installments in the “Despicable Me” franchise so successful, “Lightyear” shifted away from a formula that endeared so many generations to the “Toy Story” franchise — centering on emotional stories around beloved childhood toys.
    “Minions: The Rise of Gru” tells the villain origin story of Gru, who as a child seeks to establish himself amongst the biggest bad guys in the world. Along the way, his gang of denim overall-wearing minions bungle his plans, resulting in a silly, gut-busting romp.
    “Slapstick comedy is a tried-and-true genre that kids of all ages have always loved,” Dergarabedian said.
    “Lightyear,” which was also billed as an origin story, is about the film that made Buzz Lightyear the hottest-selling toy and a coveted prize for young Andy. The characters on screen aren’t toys that believe they are real, they are actually human. This meta-style story might have been enticing to audiences that grew up with “Toy Story” in the ’90s, but for younger generations the science fiction action adventure missed the mark.
    “Minions” was simply more accessible to audiences, analysts said.
    “Minions” also got a surprise boost at the box office from teenagers, who bought 15% of the movie’s tickets during its opening weekend. Only 6% of that important demographic bought “Lightyear” tickets, according to data from EntTelligence.
    A new trend on TikTok likely helped fuel “Minions” sales, as groups of young moviegoers dressed in formal attire to attend showings of the new film. The “Gentleminions” hashtag has more than 9 million views on TikTok and gained the attention of Universal Studios.
    “To everyone showing up to ‘Minions’ in suits: we see you and we love you,” the company wrote in a tweet last Friday.
    Families accounted for 68% of “Minions: The Rise of Gru” ticket sales during its opening weekend, while adults without children accounted for 17% of tickets.
    For “Lightyear,” families accounted for 65% of the tickets sold, while adults without children made up nearly 30% of ticket sales.
    “What ‘Minions: The Rise of Gru’s debut proves without a doubt is that family audiences are once again able to strongarm a film at the box office,” said Jeff Bock, senior analyst at Exhibitor Relations. “We saw that with ‘Sonic 2′ earlier this year, but hadn’t yet seen a traditional animated film slay the box office since pre-pandemic times.”
    While it’s a promising sign for theaters that parents and kids are finally flocking back to cinemas, production delays during the pandemic mean there aren’t many new movies for them to watch.
    Nickelodeon’s “Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank” arrives July 15 followed by Warner Bros.’ “DC League of Super-Pets” on July 29 and then there is a lull until Disney’s “Strange World” arrives Nov. 23.
    “This summer has long looked like it would provide the most high-profile animated releases for most of the remainder of the year, so it’s great news that the ‘Minions’ film is overperforming in the way it is,” said Shawn Robbins, chief analyst at BoxOffice.com.
    Robbins noted that the Sony film “Lyle, Lyle Crocodile,” which uses live action and animation, could be a sleeper hit at the box office when it arrives Oct. 7 to help tide over families with children looking for movies to attend during the fall.
    Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. NBCUniversal is the distributor of “Minions: The Rise of Gru.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    California federal judge throws out Trump-era changes that weakened Endangered Species Act

    A California federal judge on Tuesday threw out Trump-era changes to the Endangered Species Act, voiding regulations that have weakened protections for wildlife.
    The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar restores protections for hundreds of species and comes in response to a lawsuit that several environmental groups filed in 2019 against the Trump administration.
    “The court spoke for species desperately in need of comprehensive federal protections without compromise,” Kristen Boyles, an attorney at Earthjustice, said in a statement.

    A Mexican gray wolf leaves cover at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, Socorro County, N.M.
    Jim Clark | U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service via AP

    A California federal judge on Tuesday threw out Trump-era changes to the landmark Endangered Species Act, voiding regulations that made it harder to protect wildlife from the effects of human development and climate change.
    The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar restores protections for hundreds of species and comes in response to a lawsuit that EarthJustice, the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council and other environmental groups filed in 2019 against the Trump administration.

    Changes under Trump had made it easier to remove protections for threatened animals and plants, and allowed federal agencies to conduct economic assessments when deciding whether to protect a species from matters like construction projects in critical habitats. It also removed tools that scientists used to forecast future damage to species from climate change.
    The previous administration had argued the changes would make the law more efficient while easing burdens on landowners and corporations.

    More from CNBC Climate:

    In 2021, Interior Secretary Deb Haaland and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, along with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, filed a motion to remand the rules voluntarily in response to the environmental groups’ lawsuit.
    The federal agencies asked the court to let them partially rewrite the Endangered Species Act regulations while keeping them in place, so that the agencies could conduct a review process of the changes before taking action. Such a process could take months or years to complete, according to environmental groups.
    But the court decided to instead void the Trump-era changes altogether, arguing there was no reason to keep rules that were going to be changed anyway.

    “Regardless of whether this Court vacates the 2019 [Endangered Species Act] Rules, they will not remain in effect in their current form,” Tigar wrote in his ruling.
    “The court spoke for species desperately in need of comprehensive federal protections without compromise,” Kristen Boyles, an attorney at Earthjustice, said in a statement. “Threatened and endangered species do not have the luxury of waiting under rules that do not protect them.”
    The Endangered Species Act has been credited with helping rescue species like the bald eagle, grizzly bear, Florida manatee and humpback whale since President Richard Nixon signed it into law in 1973. The legislation currently protects more than 1,600 species.
    “Trump’s gutting of endangered species protections should have been rescinded on day one of the Biden presidency,” Noah Greenwald, endangered species director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement. “With this court ruling, the Services can finally get on with the business of protecting and recovering imperiled species.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Why driving big rig trucks is a job fewer Americans dream about doing

    State of Freight

    In April, Walmart made headlines by announcing that it will pay its private fleet truck drivers as much as $110,000 in their first year with the big-box retailer.
    The median pay for big-rig drivers in 2021 was $48,310, or about $23 an hour, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.
    Pay is far from the only issue in a long-haul sector that has a shortage of drivers forecast to double to 160,000 by 2030: competition from e-commerce, retirements, and difficulty attracting new workers and female workers are big issues.

    A Walmart truck departs the company’s distribution center in Washington, Utah.
    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    In April, Walmart made headlines by announcing that it will pay its private fleet truck drivers as much as $110,000 in their first year with the big-box retailer, up from an average starting salary of $87,000. Yellow Corp., a holding company for several carriers, said its drivers can make up to $100,000 a year. Some trucking companies are offering $10,000 cash bonuses to new drivers.
    Meanwhile, the American Trucking Associations (ATA) reported a shortage of 80,000 drivers last year, an all-time high that could reach 160,000 by 2030. The solution, the ATA said, is to recruit a million new drivers over the next decade.

    At first glance, this might look like the perfect time to get behind the wheel of a big rig. But when you look under the hood of this time-honored profession — which in 2020 employed more than 1.95 million heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) — you discover that not everything is running smoothly.
    “Trucking is a story of bifurcation,” said Steve Viscelli, an economic sociologist at the University of Pennsylvania, who has researched the industry for more than 15 years. “There are some excellent jobs and some terrible jobs.”
    Walmart’s more than 12,000 drivers fall into the former category, beneficiaries of the company’s nearly 21% salary bump. “Our goal with raising pay was to ensure Walmart remains one of the best driving jobs in the industry,” said Fernando Cortes, senior vice president of transportation, in an email. “These recent investments will help us continue to hire aggressively to meet increased demand from customers.” Last year, Walmart brought on nearly 4,500 new drivers, the most in company history, Cortes said, and “we aim to hire over 5,000 this year, which includes training between 400 to 800 new drivers through our Private Fleet Development program.”

    Median pay for big-rig drivers under $50,000

    Putting Walmart aside, the median annual pay for big-rig drivers in 2021, per BLS, was $48,310 or about $23 an hour. Many of them work 60-70 hours a week, though a good deal of that time is spent waiting for goods to be loaded or unloaded, and they’re only paid for driving time. Many aren’t compensated for overtime, don’t have health care benefits, are paying their own fuel costs and spend days or weeks away from home.
    Those are among the reasons why numerous industry insiders contend that it’s not so much a matter of a driver shortage, but rather an issue of retaining drivers in less-than-desirable jobs.

    At the large truckload carriers, such as J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Swift Transportation and Werner Enterprises, which haul a single commodity that fills an entire trailer, annual turnover rates averaged 94% between 1995 and 2017, according to a BLS report. Conversely, among major less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers, including Yellow, UPS and XPO Logistics, whose trailers carry multiple items for numerous customers, the turnover rate was less than 12%.
    Addressing the driver shortage, ATA chief economist Bob Costello pointed to several contributing factors. “Part of the shortage is drivers leaving the industry because they are retiring,” he said in an email, noting that the average age of drivers is mid to late 40s. “Some people do get into the industry and realize that the lifestyle is not for them,” Costello added, “but I don’t know what percentage that is. There are job alternatives that have them home every night, like delivering packages for e-commerce [businesses].”
    The ATA also cited the low number of women drivers, only 7%; drivers failing drug tests, especially in states where recreational marijuana is legal; federal laws requiring interstate drivers to be at least 21; and applicants for a commercial driver’s license (CDL) declined for poor driving records or criminal backgrounds. 
    “We’ve listened to this driver shortage nonsense since the 1980s,” said Todd Spencer, president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), which represents roughly 150,000 members who own and/or operate more than 240,000 individual heavy-duty trucks and small truck fleets. “If you have a business where [more than 90%] of your workforce turned over every year, how efficient or good a business would it be? Yet it’s commonplace in trucking, because they can’t keep workers. I don’t know how you classify that as a shortage.”

    As distinct as these two labor markets are, they’re linked to one another. “The big truckload firms with high turnover rates have the greatest interest in recruiting and training new drivers,” said Viscelli, who worked undercover at a driver-training school, drove a long-haul truck for six months and subsequently wrote The Big Rig: Trucking and the Decline of the American Dream. “They are the central entrance to the pipeline. The better employers have sat back, let those crappy companies recruit, train and employ drivers for a year or two, then skim the cream off the top.”
    In the worst-case scenarios, a truckload carrier will cover the cost of training new recruits to obtain a CDL — private driving schools charge up to $10,000 — then hire them, at low minimum wages or per-mile rates, as independent contractors who have to pay all their own expenses. Some companies lock new drivers into exclusive contracts, for two years or longer, and if they quit during the interim, bill them to recoup the training costs.
    The ATA, with affiliates in all 50 states, represents the wide spectrum of trucking companies, from publicly owned truckload carriers that transport goods coast-to-coast to local delivery services that drop off packages to homes and businesses. The association’s latest trends report stated that as of February 2021, the Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration had 996,894 for-hire carriers on file, along with an additional 813,440 private fleets. The vast majority of those are small owner-operator businesses, with 97.4% running fewer than 20 trucks and 91.5% with six trucks or less.
    Of the nearly 38 million trucks registered for commercial use in the U.S. in 2020, 3.91 million were Class 8 vehicles, typically tractor-trailers weighing over 33,000 pounds. According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Commodity Flow Survey, trucks transported 71.6% or $10.4 trillion of the $14.5 trillion of the value of all goods shipped in 2017, the latest year for which statistics are available.
    These are not the truck drivers glamorized in 1970s movies like Smokey and the Bandit, Every Which Way But Loose and Convoy. The industry was deregulated in 1980 when President Jimmy Carter signed the Motor Carrier Act. Before then, there were fewer than 20,000 authorized interstate trucking companies in the country, and the majority of big-rig drivers were members of the Teamsters union, earning an average of more than $100,000 in today’s dollars. Deregulation opened the floodgates to fierce competition among shippers and carriers, as well as drivers. Today more than 10 million Americans hold a CDL, Viscelli said, nearly triple the 3.5 million jobs that require the certification.
    Only about 60,000 of those CDL holders are members of the Teamsters, said Danny Avelyn, director of the union’s freight division. “Our drivers work for the LTL carriers, and they’re extremely busy,” he said. “There are plenty of people interested in driving jobs, but it’s about working where the pay and benefits are the best.” The average annual earnings of Teamsters who drive for major carriers is $80,000, plus health care, overtime and other perks, “and the majority of our people go home at night,” Avelyn said.
    In December, in response to persistent supply chains disruptions and rising inflation, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced the Biden-Harris Trucking Action Plan. The initiative features a federally funded apprenticeship program for truckers, involving more than 100 employers and industry partners. “Making sure truck drivers are paid and treated fairly is the right thing to do, and it will help with both recruiting new drivers and keeping experienced drivers on the job,” said Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.
    Yellow is coordinating with the DOL in running its 20 driving academies across the country. “Our academies are paid, one-year apprenticeship programs that consist of four weeks of classroom instruction and on-the-road training with a certified instructor,” said Tamara Jalving, the company’s vice president of safety and talent acquisition. The students, hired as Yellow employees at $17.50 an hour, earn a CDL and then receive an additional four weeks of skills training. “They all become Teamsters,” Jalving said, “and can make between $65,000 and $95,000 a year, but the company has a good number of drivers who make more than $100,000,” plus full family benefits and hourly pay for load delays and layovers.
    The Yellow academies, which receive state and federal grant support, graduated 650 drivers in 2021 and anticipate 1,000 this year, Jalving said. “It’s important that every [carrier] take this approach. We have to stop poaching each other’s talent and start efforts in developing new drivers,” she said.

    A semi truck used by students while earning their commercial driver’s license (CDL) parked at Truck America Training of Kentucky in Shepherdsville, Kentucky, U.S., on Monday, Oct. 25, 2021.
    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Those efforts include attracting, and retaining, more women to the industry, which is a focus of the Women in Trucking Association (WIT). In addition to working with Boys and Girls Clubs and Girls Scouts to raise awareness among young women about the profession, “We have a mentoring program that matches seasoned female drivers with new female CDL holders,” said president and CEO Ellen Voie.
    Personal safety is the number-one reason women leave trucking, Voie said. A whitepaper recently published by WIT, “Addressing Gender Bias and Harassment in the Trucking Industry,” includes results of a survey of women drivers. More than half reported that while on the job they have received verbally offensive comments more than once, 28% have received multiple verbal threats, 39% have been subject to an unwanted physical advance more than once, and nearly 4% have experienced rape.
    Another issue leading drivers to quit their jobs are unscrupulous lease-purchase agreements. In general, under a lease-purchase deal, a carrier leases a truck to a driver, who assumes responsibility for regular payments and sometimes fuel costs, maintenance and other overhead. Ideally, once the full cost of the lease is paid, the driver owns the truck. There are many instances, however, where drivers can’t keep up payments and default on the agreement.
    “There is a segment of the industry that make lease-purchase arrangements attractive to drivers who don’t have credit,” Spencer said. “They may seem attractive at the time, but more often than not, they turn out to be basically unkept promises. When they recognize it’s not a good deal, they will say bye,” he said, at the risk of personal liability and financial ruin. “That’s often predatory, but also blatantly unfair in that you have your personal credit and other assets that get dragged into this.”
    A provision included in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and reiterated in the White House’s Trucking Action Plan, calls for the formation of a truck leasing task force that will investigate predatory truck leasing arrangements with the DOL and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
    Looming over the various issues impacting truck drivers is the ongoing development of autonomous trucks by tech companies including Aurora, Waymo, Tesla and TuSimple, as well as legacy truck manufacturers such as Daimler, Volvo and Navistar. A recent academic study found that as many as 500,000 long-haul driver jobs may be impacted.
    Proponents of self-driving trucks point to improved safety and greater efficiency versus human drivers, who by law can’t drive more than eight hours before taking a break, and no more than 11 hours daily. “Safety is really the founding reason that Waymo started working on this technology,” said Charlie Jatt, the startup’s head of commercialization for trucking, at a recent industry conference.
    The Teamsters, predictably, are not in favor of autonomous trucks, “not even a little bit,” Avelyn said, who questions the safety argument. “I don’t think the motoring public is ready for an 80,000-pound, unmanned tractor-trailer going down the interstate. I’m not,” he said. The OOIDA has issued a paper stating, “The vast majority of OOIDA members are against autonomous truck technology for a variety of different reasons, including safety, job security and cost, both for the technology itself and for infrastructure.”
    Avery Vise, vice president of trucking for FTR Transportation Intelligence, said that autonomous trucks are on the horizon, “but we’re not talking about them having a significant amount of freight hauling until the second half of the next decade or later.” The best applications, he said, will be long, flat stretches along interstates, as opposed to short-haul deliveries in urban areas, where drivers will still be needed.
    “I don’t think [self-driving trucks] reduce the number of drivers you need,” Vise said. “They just change the nature of the driver job, making it a local job where you’re home at night, which is where the industry wants to be anyway. If you want to drive a truck, you’ll always have a job.” More

  • in

    Oil tumbles as much as 10%, breaks below $100 as recession fears mount

    Oil well pump jacks operated by Chevron Corp. in San Ardo, California, U.S., on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Oil prices tumbled Tuesday with the U.S. benchmark falling below $100 as recession fears grow, sparking fears that an economic slowdown will cut demand for petroleum products.
    West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S. oil benchmark, settled 8.24%, or $8.93, lower at $99.50 per barrel. At one point WTI slid more than 10%, trading as low as $97.43 per barrel. The contract last traded under $100 on May 11.

    International benchmark Brent crude settled 9.45%, or $10.73, lower at $102.77 per barrel.
    Ritterbusch and Associates attributed the move to “tightness in global oil balances increasingly being countered by strong likelihood of recession that has begun to curtail oil demand.”
    “[T]he oil market appears to be homing in on some recent weakening in apparent demand for gasoline and diesel,” the firm wrote in a note to clients.
    Both contracts posted losses in June, snapping six straight months of gains as recession fears cause Wall Street to reconsider the demand outlook.
    Citi said Tuesday that Brent could fall to $65 by the end of this year should the economy tip into a recession.

    “In a recession scenario with rising unemployment, household and corporate bankruptcies, commodities would chase a falling cost curve as costs deflate and margins turn negative to drive supply curtailments,” the firm wrote in a note to clients.
    Citi has been one of the few oil bears at a time when other firms, such as Goldman Sachs, have called for oil to hit $140 or more.
    Prices have been elevated since Russia invaded Ukraine, raising concerns about global shortages given the nation’s role as a key commodities supplier, especially to Europe.
    WTI spiked to a high of $130.50 per barrel in March, while Brent came within striking distance of $140. It was each contract’s highest level since 2008.
    But oil was on the move even ahead of Russia’s invasion thanks to tight supply and rebounding demand.
    High commodity prices have been a major contributor to surging inflation, which is at the highest in 40 years.
    Prices at the pump topped $5 per gallon earlier this summer, with the national average hitting a high of $5.016 on June 14. The national average has since pulled back amid oil’s decline, and sat at $4.80 on Tuesday.
    Despite the recent decline some experts say oil prices are likely to remain elevated.
    “Recessions don’t have a great track record of killing demand. Product inventories are at critically low levels, which also suggests restocking will keep crude oil demand strong,” Bart Melek, head of commodity strategy at TD Securities, said Tuesday in a note.
    The firm added that minimal progress has been made on solving structural supply issues in the oil market, meaning that even if demand growth slows prices will remain supported.
    “Financial markets are trying to price in a recession. Physical markets are telling you something really different,” Jeffrey Currie, global head of commodities research at Goldman Sachs, told CNBC Tuesday.
    When it comes to oil, Currie said it’s the tightest physical market on record. “We’re at critically low inventories across the space,” he said. Goldman has a $140 target on Brent.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More