More stories

  • in

    Younger consumers are eating less Chipotle and Cava. They are buying more Coach bags

    Coach parent Tapestry is still drawing new customers, especially from Gen Z, which is spending on handbags and other fashion accessories.
    The company is at odds with businesses like Chipotle and Cava, which saw a drop in sales among younger customers.
    The split in results reflects that consumers are still splurging in some areas, as they save in others.

    Chipotle Mexican Grill and Coach store logos.
    Getty Images

    Chipotle and Cava pinned weaker sales on younger customers who are pulling back and packing lunches.
    But Gen Z shoppers are still spending on Coach handbags to bring to work — even if they’re skipping bowls and burritos.

    Coach’s parent company, Tapestry, raised its full-year outlook Thursday, after beating Wall Street’s expectations for quarterly earnings and revenue and posting double-digit sales gains in North America.
    In an interview with CNBC, Tapestry CEO Joanne Crevoiserat said the company’s sales in the quarter were fueled by attracting new customers, particularly within Gen Z.
    Tapestry, which also includes Kate Spade, acquired more than 2.2 million new customers globally in its fiscal 2026 first quarter, driven by growth in Gen Z consumers compared with the prior year. The company said that generation, which is typically defined as spanning in age from roughly 13 to 29, accounted for about 35% of new customers.
    “The Gen Z consumer, specifically, is highly fashion engaged, spending slightly more of their budget on fashion,” she said.

    Blurred pedestrians walk past an illuminated Coach New York logo at a storefront in a shopping mall, on June 23, 2025 in Chongqing, China.
    Cheng Xin | Getty Images

    Crevoiserat added those younger customers have a high retention rate, “maybe busting a myth that these customers, Gen Z customers, aren’t sticky or loyal.”

    Here’s what the company reported for the fiscal first quarter compared with what Wall Street expected, according to a survey of analysts by LSEG:

    Earnings per share: $1.38 adjusted vs. $1.26 expected
    Revenue: $1.70 billion vs. $1.64 billion expected

    Tapestry’s net income in the three-month period that ended Sept. 27 rose to $274.8 million, or $1.28 per share, compared with $186.6 million, or 79 cents per share, in the year-ago period. Revenue rose from $1.51 billion a year earlier. Adjusting for one-time items, including interest expenses, Tapestry reported adjusted earnings per share of $1.38.
    It hiked its full-year outlook for both sales and profits, saying it now expects revenue around $7.3 billion for the year, which would be 4% or 5% growth from the prior year, compared with its previous expectations of nearly $7.2 billion. For earnings per diluted share, it now expects a range of $5.45 to $5.60, higher than its prior guidance of $5.30 to $5.45.
    Despite the raised forecast and better-than-expected quarterly results, Tapestry’s shares fell more than 9% on Thursday.
    With its Gen Z strength, Tapestry defied some other companies’ assessments on the health of younger shoppers.
    Cava saw demand among the 25- to 34-year-old consumers fall as the fast-casual chain entered its current quarter, CFO Tricia Tolivar said in an interview with CNBC. She attributed a pullback to younger diners’ higher unemployment rate, their greater likelihood of facing the student loan repayments that resumed in the spring and tariffs creating “an overall fog for the consumer.”
    Chipotle’s CEO, Scott Boatwright, similarly said the chain is seeing younger diners visit less frequently, especially those between the ages of 25 and 35 years old.
    And some holiday forecasts have also reflected a predicted drop in spending by Gen Z. According to consulting firm PwC’s holiday survey, Gen Z plans to cut average holiday spending the most among generations surveyed compared with the year-ago period — with respondents in that age group saying they plan to spend 23% less.
    Deloitte found a similar trend, with Gen Z consumers saying in its separate survey that they plan to spend an average of 34% less this holiday season than a year ago. Weakness carried into the next oldest generation, as millennials — respondents between ages 29 and 44 in the poll — said they expect to spend an average of 13% less this holiday season.
    — CNBC’s Amelia Lucas contributed to this report.
    Correction: Tapestry reported revenue of $1.70 billion. An earlier version misstated the figure. More

  • in

    Retailers’ holiday hiring to hit lowest level since the Great Recession, says major industry trade group

    Holiday hiring by retailers is expected to fall to its lowest level in at least 15 years, the National Retail Federation said Thursday.
    The major industry group’s prediction offers the latest glimpse into the jobs market as the record government shutdown stretches on.
    Even so, the NRF expects holiday spending to hit a record of between $1.1 trillion to $1.2 trillion from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31, the first time the total would top $1 trillion.

    Shoppers carry bags at Broadway Plaza in Walnut Creek, California, US, on Monday, Dec. 16, 2024. The Bureau of Economic Analysis is scheduled to release personal spending figures on December 20. 
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Holiday hiring by retailers is expected to total between 265,000 and 365,000 roles this year, the lowest number of seasonal workers in at least 15 years, the National Retail Federation said Thursday.
    NRF CEO Matthew Shay said on the retail trade group’s conference call on that those hiring expectations “reflect the softening and slowing labor market.” It’s a significant drop from a year ago, when retailers hired 442,000 seasonal workers, the retail trade group said.

    Some companies may have hired seasonal workers early to support sales events in October, but retailers have largely tried to limit their spending as they manage higher costs from tariffs, NRF chief economist Mark Mathews said.
    The major industry group’s prediction offers the latest glimpse into the jobs market as the record government shutdown stretches on and leads to fewer government reports on economic data, such as unemployment and inflation. That’s caused companies and economists to rely on data from private companies or organizations instead.
    Earlier Thursday, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas said layoff announcements soared in October to 153,074, a 183% jump from September and 175% surge from the same month a year ago. That marked the highest level for any October since 2003, and 2025 has been the worst year for announced layoffs since 2009.
    On the other hand, payrolls processing firm ADP reported net job growth in October of 42,000, reversing two consecutive months of losses in the private sector.

    Higher spending, lower hiring

    Even with the lower levels of seasonal staffing, the NRF is optimistic holiday spending will be strong. It said it expects holiday spending to hit a record of between $1.1 trillion to $1.2 trillion from Nov. 1 through Dec. 31, the first time the total would top $1 trillion.

    That would represent 3.7% to 4.2% year-over-year growth from the previous holiday season, a slight decrease from last year’s 4.3% holiday sales growth rate. NRF’s forecast excludes auto dealers, gas stations and restaurants.
    Even with low consumer sentiment, a prolonged government shutdown, “on-again-off-again tariffs” and price sensitivity because of inflation, Shay said consumers have defied expectations and kept spending.
    “In fairness, that’s been somewhat of a surprise based on where we thought we might be way back in April,” he said.
    He said the trade group anticipates that dynamic will persist during the key holiday shopping season. Households typically cut back during other parts of the year or on other parts of the budget to make it a festive time, he said.
    Even as consumers continue to spend, the retail industry has taken a cautious stance on hiring — a fact reflected in NRF’s predictions for seasonal workers. It is the fourth slowest year for retail hiring on a year-to-date basis since at least 2000, behind only 2009, 2010 and 2012, several of the years following the Great Recession.
    Mathews told CNBC in an interview that the slow hiring environment all comes down to one word: uncertainty.
    “The one thing you know businesses do when they are in uncertain environments is they put things on hold,” he told CNBC in an interview.
    On NRF’s conference call on Thursday, Mathews said the U.S. economy doesn’t need the same level of job creation as it used to because of demographic and policy shifts, including the retirement of Baby Boomers and President Donald Trump’s crackdown on immigration.
    Still, he said, the level of hiring and investment by companies will be an important indicator to watch in the coming year.
    Right now, he said, a flood of investment in artificial intelligence has been “a huge boon for the economy.” But he added “that may be covering up a few cracks.”
    “We need to keep a close eye on on how businesses are feeling and what remains an uncertain environment,” he said. More

  • in

    Here’s how much weight loss drugs could cost you under Trump’s deals with Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk

    President Donald Trump struck landmark deals with Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk to slash the prices of their blockbuster weight loss drugs. 
    Under the agreements, the monthly out-of-pocket cost of popular injections and upcoming pills could range from $50 to $350, depending on the dosage and insurance coverage a patient has.
    Existing GLP-1s, including Eli Lilly’s obesity injection Zepbound and Novo Nordisk’s competitor Wegovy, carry list prices above $1,000 a month, which has prevented many patients from taking them.

    Wegovy injection pens arranged in Waterbury, Vermont, US, on Monday, April 28, 2025.
    Shelby Knowles | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    President Donald Trump on Thursday struck landmark deals with Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk to slash the prices of their blockbuster weight loss drugs. 
    Under the agreements, the monthly out-of-pocket cost of popular injections and upcoming pills could range from $50 to $350 starting next year, depending on the dosage and insurance coverage a patient has, Trump administration officials said. 

    Existing GLP-1s, including Eli Lilly’s obesity injection Zepbound and Novo Nordisk’s competitor Wegovy, carry list prices above $1,000 a month, which has prevented many patients from taking them. Both companies have introduced lower cost options for people paying in cash and purchasing the drugs directly through their websites.
    But the deals with Trump, as part of his “most favored nation” policy, take those efforts to expand access even further. Here’s how much weight loss drugs could cost for patients under the new agreements, based on the details shared so far.

    Medicare 

    Medicare has covered GLP-1 drugs for diabetes and some other medical conditions: for example, Wegovy for slashing cardiovascular risks. But under the new deals, Medicare will start covering the drugs for obesity for the first time starting in mid-2026, which could allow more seniors to qualify for them and spur more private insurers to cover them.
    Certain Medicare patients will pay a copay of $50 per month for all approved uses of GLP-1 drugs, including diabetes and obesity treatment. 
    But the Trump administration is putting some constraints on which Medicare beneficiaries will be eligible to receive GLP-1s for obesity and cardiovascular and metabolic benefits. 

    Patients are eligible if they fall into these three cohorts:

    The first includes those who are overweight — with a body mass index greater than 27 — or with prediabetes or established cardiovascular disease.
    The second group is people with obesity – with a BMI greater than 30 – and uncontrolled hypertension, kidney disease or heart failure.
    The third group is patients with severe obesity, or anyone with a BMI greater than 35.

    Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk voluntarily agreed to reduce the prices the government pays for existing GLP-1 drugs already approved for diabetes and other uses to $245 a month, across all non-starting doses. Savings generated by those price reductions will allow Medicare to start paying that same price point for GLP-1s for patients with obesity and a high metabolic or cardiovascular risk. 

    Direct-to-consumer

    The agreement will also allow patients to get GLP-1s on direct-to-consumer platforms at steeper discounts than they already receive through drugmakers’ existing sites.
    On TrumpRx – the government’s direct-to-consumer platform for buying prescription drugs with cash expected to launch next year – the average monthly cost for Wegovy, Zepbound and other injectable GLP-1s will start at $350 and drop to $250 within the next two years, according to senior administration officials.
    Starting doses of upcoming obesity pills from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, pending approvals, will be $145 per month on TrumpRx, Medicare and Medicaid. Under the deals announced Thursday, the drugmakers will get fast-track reviews of their forthcoming pills. 
    Eli Lilly on Thursday said it would lower prices by $50 on its own direct-to-consumer platform, LillyDirect, which already offers Zepbound and other drugs at a discount to cash-paying patients. The multidose pen of Zepbound will be available for $299 per month at the lowest dose, with additional doses being priced up to $449 per month. 
    Eli Lilly’s pill, once approved, will be available at the lowest dose starting at $149 per month

    Medicaid

    State Medicaid coverage of GLP-1 drugs for obesity is spotty. 
    But Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly agreed to extend lower government pricing for their GLP-1 drugs – $245 per month across all other non-starting doses – to all 50 Medicaid programs for all covered uses. 
    States will have to opt into those prices, meaning some may not. Check with your state government about coverage. More

  • in

    This fintech unicorn just launched an AI agent to handle billions of dollars in CRE lending

    Built Technologies is a provider of construction and real estate finance technology.
    It unveiled an AI agent specifically for what’s known in the business as draw requests, in which developers or construction firms ask their lenders for the next stage of financing.
    “We’re trying to improve that ecosystem up and down the value chain of the construction real estate industry,” said Chase Gilbert, CEO of Built Technologies. 

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Courtesy of Built Technologies

    A version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Property Play newsletter with Diana Olick. Property Play covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, from individuals to venture capitalists, private equity funds, family offices, institutional investors and large public companies. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
    If you rent an apartment, you’ve probably “talked” to an AI agent to help get your leaky toilet fixed. But what if you’re a builder making a request for funds from your lender? That’s a much more complicated process — and there’s an AI agent for that now as well. 

    Built Technologies, a provider of construction and real estate finance technology that reached a $1.5 billion valuation in 2021, is taking its proprietary software to the next level, unveiling an AI agent that has been in the testing phase with a few of its lender clients. Now, Built says, it’s ready for the broader market. 
    “We’re trying to improve that ecosystem up and down the value chain of the construction real estate industry,” said Chase Gilbert, CEO of Built Technologies. 
    This agent is being implemented specifically for what’s known in the business as draw requests. Traditionally, as a developer or construction firm completes each leg of the process, they ask their lender for the next stage of financing, the draw. That usually takes days or weeks to process, because the loan officers have to review documentation, verify progress, assess risk, and approve disbursements. Now the so-called Draw Agent will take over.
    “There is an opportunity to fundamentally serve the ecosystem, and we actually purpose-built technology to connect the key stakeholders, where everyone’s looking at the same information at the same time and can request funds or can make a payment with more confidence,” said Gilbert. 

    Get Property Play directly to your inbox

    CNBC’s Property Play with Diana Olick covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, delivered weekly to your inbox.
    Subscribe here to get access today.

    Over the past decade, Built has been working with lenders, both bank and non-bank, as well as those in the private credit space, to help them manage capital improvement construction projects and get their money faster and more easily from their capital partners. 

    Clients include U.S. Bank, Citi and Fifth Third. Built also helps with payments to downstream trade partners, like general contractors, subcontractors, architects, attorneys and designers. That was the original software.
    Enter AI, and now Built has created what Gilbert calls an embedded teammate that can do all that work and guarantee that it’s all compliant because there is no human margin of error. Built has been testing the agent with a few of its lenders, including Anchor Loans, for the last three months. 
    It is now reporting 95% faster draw approvals with reviews completed in as few as 3 minutes, a 400% increase in risk detection versus human-led reviews, and 100% adherence to each lender’s policies and procedures.
    Companies using the new agent reported a 300% to 500% return on investment (ROI), even on portfolios as small as about 500 loans, according to Built. Companies came to that finding by comparing the time and operational cost savings generated through automation against their investment. Lenders in the pilot said they saw significant reductions in manual workload, increasing efficiencies without having to hire new people. 
    Gilbert said the AI agent is acting on trillions of dollars worth of construction draw data that Built has compiled over the last decade. 
    “And that’s where AI really shines. It needs a lot of data and context in order to get smart and make decisions, and we certainly have a lot of proprietary data on that,” he said.  More

  • in

    Target’s sloppier stores are wearing on shoppers, and its turnaround could hinge on cleaning them up

    Target, which has long relied on stores for online order fulfillment, is tweaking that model to try to improve shoppers’ experiences within the aisles, freeing up employees to keep items in stock and help customers.
    By increasing the volume of online fulfillment at some stores and stopping it altogether at others, Target can make the business more predictable and speed up deliveries for customers, Chief Supply Chain Officer Gretchen McCarthy said.
    Target is trying to snap a four-year sales slump and address customer complaints about sloppier stores and higher out-of-stocks.

    People walk to their car after shopping at a Target store on Oct. 3, 2025, in Jersey City, New Jersey.
    Gary Hershorn | Corbis News | Getty Images

    Customers used to hold up Target as an example of how to run large, yet sparkling stores.
    Yet in recent years, shopper complaints about sloppier aisles, longer checkout lines, locked-up merchandise and out-of-stock items have dogged the Minneapolis-based retailer, contributing to sagging sales.

    To help fix that, Target is making a move that may seem counterintuitive: It’s shaking up its online strategy. The move is a response to Target’s unique strategy of fulfilling the vast majority of its e-commerce orders at its stores, which has stretched employees and inventory thin.
    The company is now rolling out a new approach that designates only some of its stores as locations where employees pick and pack orders in cardboard boxes to ship to customers’ homes. Other stores have stopped fulfilling those orders entirely.
    The company has expanded that plan to 36 markets as of the end of October, more than half of its 60 markets, after a successful pilot in the Chicago area, said Gretchen McCarthy, chief supply chain and logistics officer. It plans to expand that further in 2026.
    The new digital strategy marks a shift for Target, which announced in 2017 that its stores would power the e-commerce side of the business. Target does not rely on huge fulfillment centers like Amazon. It instead has store employees pick products and pack them in cardboard boxes in backrooms to prepare most of its online orders — or about 98% in the most recently reported quarter. That turned all of Target’s nearly 2,000 locations into fulfillment hubs.
    Target is trying to break a streak of about four years of roughly flat annual sales as two-decade Target veteran and Chief Operating Officer Michael Fiddelke gets ready to start as CEO in February. Fiddelke said on Target’s earnings call in August that improving the customer experience is one of his top priorities, along with regaining Target’s reputation for style and design and using technology to run a more efficient business.

    In an interview with CNBC at Target’s Minneapolis headquarters in October, Fiddelke said the company’s “stores as hubs” strategy made the retailer’s e-commerce business both “cost-efficient” and “capital light” by relying on the facilities and workforce it already had.
    Target’s digital sales have more than tripled since the Covid pandemic, jumping from about $6.6 billion in the fiscal year that ended in early 2020 to nearly $21 billion in the fiscal year that ended in early 2025.
    But growth brought new challenges as attention and staffing got diverted to e-commerce, he added.
    “If you’re a store manager now, yes, you’re supporting your in-store guest and you’re also running a fulfillment business that’s gotten pretty big,” he said. “And I think we’re just now fully appreciating, ‘All right, we’ve got to make sure that we’re doing both really well and it’s more complex than it used to be.'”
    “One of the things we’re focused on is, ‘How can we remove some of that complexity?'” he said.

    Fewer boxes and more predictability

    Target started the Chicago pilot project in May to designate stores that would continue to fulfill ship-to-home deliveries, McCarthy said.
    Instead of having all 100 stores in the greater Chicago area pack the brown boxes, it’s concentrated ship-to-home fulfillment at a smaller number of locations. Eighteen stores have stopped fulfilling the online orders altogether and six locations ramped up shipping, McCarthy said.
    Five stores in the region now handle about 30% of the ship-to-home volume in the Chicago market, she said.
    All Target locations, however, will continue to fulfill orders for customers who pick up online purchases curbside or in stores.
    “The store is still very much the hub of everything that we do,” McCarthy said. “We’re just getting more precise and maybe a little bit more refined in how we’re using all of those stores and our supply chain network.”
    Target typically chose the locations that will handle higher volumes of ship-to-home orders because they had more space to pack boxes, lower foot traffic or a combination of both.
    The change has brought several key benefits for Target, McCarthy said. Delivery trucks make fewer stops at stores, which saves transportation time and costs. Stores that pack delivery boxes can better plan their staffing. Customers have a longer window to order next-day delivery, as the company turns select locations into specialists.
    In Chicago, for example, the cutoff time for next-day delivery is now 6 p.m. instead of noon, McCarthy said.
    Yet one of the most notable changes for Target has been improvement in the store experience as employees have tasks to juggle to fulfill shipping orders, she said. In stores that no longer pick and pack brown boxes in Chicago, out-of-stocks have improved, in-store sales have risen, and the company’s surveys of shoppers measuring store cleanliness and the quality of employee interactions increased by 10%, she said.
    Digital experiences for customers, which measure customers’ satisfaction with Target’s curbside or in-store pickup, improved, too.
    Mike Deyle, group vice president for Target who oversees most stores in the Chicago area, said he attributes the improvements to employees having “more capacity to focus on both the in-store experience and the digital experience.”
    But McCarthy added that Target hasn’t seen the same level of store experience improvements in the locations still picking and packing the boxes — a puzzle that the company wants to solve.

    Target Corp. packages sit at the United States Postal Service (USPS) Merrifield processing and distribution center in Merrifield, Virginia.
    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Still more to fix

    Yet Target’s new approach for fulfillment won’t address all of shoppers’ concerns.
    Store traffic has fallen nearly every week since February, according to Placer.ai, an analytics firm that uses anonymized data from mobile devices to estimate overall visits to locations. That falling foot traffic reflects a mix of economic challenges, such as financial pressures on households from higher grocery prices, and company-specific issues, such as weaker merchandise, stiffer competition and customer backlash to the company’s stance on diversity, equity and inclusion.
    Some shoppers have pointed out other aspects of some Target stores that have turned them off, such as locked-up items to prevent theft and long checkout lines.
    Through a spokesman, Target declined to specify the number of stores that lock up everyday staples like deodorant, but said the majority of locations only lock high-value products like electronics.
    Meanwhile, Target has tried to strike the right balance between staffed checkout lanes and self-checkout. In March 2024, it also capped almost all self-checkout lanes at 10 items or fewer to try to speed up the process, a move that Target said led to better customer experiences.
    Compared with many big-box and warehouse club competitors, Target’s in-store experience remains a strength, but its advantage has weakened over the past four years, according to HundredX, a customer data insights firm which surveys shoppers about their brand experience.
    For example, customers rated Target 35 points higher than superstore competitors including Walmart, Sam’s Club and Costco in atmosphere/cleanliness in October 2021, but that edge slipped to 20 points higher than rivals in October 2025.
    But Target underperformed the same retail rivals on availability of items, HundredX found, based on its trailing six-month average of customer ratings as of this month. More than 43,000 customers have participated in HundedX’s surveys in the last 12 months.
    Forty-three percent of Target customers had a favorable rating for its availability compared with 47% for retail peers. Shoppers who said they had positive experiences cited the close proximity of Target’s locations and availability of items for curbside or in-store pickup. On the other hand, customers with a negative perception cited stock consistency in stores as their top complaint.
    Emily Haleck, a mom of three who lives in Lehi, Utah, and runs a business consulting firm, said she frequently visited Target when her kids were younger. Yet the store fell out of her routine as she noticed messier aisles, particularly the sloppy piles and mismatched hangers in the clothing section. She said she shops Target’s stores only about three or four times a year and makes weekly runs to Walmart, where she said she buys groceries and finds lower prices.
    About a week ago, Haleck and her teenage daughter visited her local Target store in American Fork to find a birthday gift for her son.
    They bought a Champion water bottle and Starburst candies for her son, a bathmat for her boys’ bathroom, makeup and conditioner for her daughter, and a $3 Christmas tree for her daughter’s room, along with two shirts for herself that she plans to return.
    She said the experience felt the same as it had in recent years, with a long checkout line and “clothing chaos.”
    At a time when Target is cutting about 8% of its corporate workforce, some analysts think Target needs to step up its investment in its stores. Scot Ciccarelli, a retail analyst for Truist, said he wants to see the company spend significantly more to better compete with rivals on price and improve store operations, including through more staffing and better technology.
    “You can’t keep cutting costs,” he said. “You can’t cut your way to prosperity.”
    He said if Target doesn’t make investments, it will continue to lose market share.
    Fiddelke told CNBC that the company is “always looking at what’s the right level of staffing in our store,” but said it’s focused on reducing complexity to free up employees rather than adding to the payroll. He said Target will keep investing in store openings and remodels.
    Fiddelke added Target’s internal metrics show its in-stock levels have improved sequentially over the past three quarters, and frequently purchased items are more reliably in stock.
    During the busy shopping season, he said customers should expect Target to have better in-stocks than they saw a year ago.
    But he said the company has more work to do on the other side of the holidays. More

  • in

    America’s furniture-makers exemplify the folly of tariffs

    TWICE A YEAR the curtain rises on High Point, North Carolina. Each April and October some 2,000 exhibitors and hundreds of greeters, baristas, policemen and coat-checkers assume their places. When the audience—75,000 wholesalers, retailers and designers—step off their shuttle buses, the show begins. More

  • in

    China’s life-sciences industry is turning American

    AMERICA’s BODY corporate looks, as a whole, to be in rude health. One large company after another is presenting record quarterly results. Bosses are raising profit forecasts left and right. Poke and prod big business, though, and you find pockets of sickliness. On November 4th Pfizer, maker of drugs from covid-19 vaccines to Viagra, reported year-on-year declines in sales and earnings. To add insult to this financial injury, it has found itself in a bidding war against Novo Nordisk, a Danish rival, over Metsera, a developer of anti-obesity drugs for which Pfizer has raised its offer from $7bn in September to $10bn this week. More

  • in

    CarMax stock falls more than 10% as CEO steps down

    Shares of CarMax Inc. fell more than 10% during premarket trading Thursday after the used car retailer announced the unexpected departure of CEO Bill Nash.
    CarMax said board member David McCreight, a retail clothing executive who has served as CEO of Lulu’s Fashion Lounge Holdings, will serve as interim CEO

    A CarMax dealership in Santa Rosa, California, on April 11, 2023.
    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    DETROIT – Shares of CarMax Inc. fell more than 10% during premarket trading Thursday after the used car retailer announced the unexpected departure of CEO Bill Nash.
    The company said board member David McCreight, a retail clothing executive who has served as CEO of Lulu’s Fashion Lounge Holdings and president of Urban Outfitters Inc., will serve as CarMax’s interim CEO until a permanent replacement has been found.

    CarMax also said Chair Tom Folliard, an executive with a 30-year history with the company, including as CEO from 2006 to 2016, has been appointed interim executive chair.
    “The Board has decided that more direct involvement from David and me will help strengthen the business in this transitional period. During this time, we are focused on driving sales, enhancing profitability and reducing cost,” Folliard said in a release, adding that the company’s recent results “do not reflect that potential and change is needed.”
    The announced changes are effective Dec. 1, according to CarMax.
    CarMax has struggled this year, with its stock price down roughly 50% in 2025. That compares with other car retailer stocks being up double digits, including a 52% increase this year for online used car retailer Carvana.
    Nash on CarMax’s most recent quarterly earnings call in September admitted that results that “fell short” of the company’s expectations, as well as Wall Street’s. The results included notable declines in nearly all key earnings including sales, net earnings and gross profit.

    Those September results led to a significant decline in shares of the company and negative analyst reactions, including a $14 price cut by Morgan Stanley.
    This is breaking news. Please check back for additional information. More