More stories

  • in

    Parent of CycleBar, Pure Barre fitness studios sees shares whipsaw after CEO ousted, federal probe disclosed

    Xponential Fitness, the parent company of CycleBar and Pure Barre fitness studios, has suspended CEO Anthony Geisler indefinitely and named an interim CEO.
    Xponential Fitness also said it had received a notice that the U.S. Attorney’s Office is conducting an investigation into the company.
    It had previously disclosed an SEC investigation, which alleged the company provided false and/or misleading information to investors and franchise owners.

    Xponential Fitness CEO Anthony Geisler at the New York Stock Exchange.
    Source: NYSE

    Shares of Xponential Fitness, the parent company of CycleBar and Pure Barre fitness studios, bounced around in trading Monday after the company announced late Friday that CEO Anthony Geisler would be suspended indefinitely and would become an inactive member of the board.
    The company’s shares were initially down about 10% Monday morning, but rebounded and ended the trading session 11% higher. The company has a market capitalization of just under $500 million.

    Brenda Morris, a board member since 2019, will be stepping in as interim CEO.
    Xponential Fitness, which owns more than 3,000 boutique fitness and wellness studios globally, also said it received notice last week of a probe by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California.
    “As it relates to the investigation, it sounds like the information requested largely mimics that of the previously disclosed SEC investigation,” said Korinne Wolfmeyer, an analyst at Piper Sandler. Piper Sandler maintains a hold rating on Xponential Fitness stock, but lowered its price target to $9 from $12. As of Monday’s close, shares were trading for $9.44 apiece.
    Xponential Fitness’ leadership had previously disclosed an SEC investigation in December, which alleged that the company provided false and/or misleading information to investors, including unit volume metrics and franchise closures. Shareholders filed a class action lawsuit related to the allegations against the company in February seeking financial damages.
    “The Company intends to continue cooperating with the SEC and intends to cooperate with the USAO,” Xponential Fitness said in a press release announcing the executive changes.

    Courtesy: Xponential Fitness

    Xponential Fitness also reaffirmed its full-year 2024 guidance, which was previously announced May 2.
    The company did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment about the probe.
    “In our view, we’re pleased financial targets are still intact, and Ms. Morris seems like a fit leader for the interim role,” Wolfmeyer said.
    However, Wolfmeyer noted that the firm remains cautious.
    “We struggle to get behind this name even after Friday’s pullback,” she added.
    Correction: This story has been updated to correct Xponential Fitness’s market capitalization, which is just under $500 million.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    App stores are hugely lucrative—and under attack

    Since the first iPhone landed in people’s pockets in 2007, apps have steadily become the portal of choice to the digital world. The mobile devices on which they run now account for two-thirds of global web traffic. Inhabitants of rich countries spend about five hours a day, roughly a third of their waking lives, staring at apps. Globally some 3.5bn people use them each month.That has made the app stores that distribute them a lucrative business for Apple and Alphabet, the tech titans whose iOS and Android operating systems power the vast majority of mobile devices around the world. That, in turn, has drawn the attention of governments, which are leaning on the duopoly to limit access to disfavoured apps while also working to loosen its stranglehold over the market. They risk irking consumers on both counts. More

  • in

    Airlines ask court to block Biden administration’s new fee disclosure rule

    Major airlines and an industry trade association asked a federal appeals court to toss out a new Transportation Department rule requiring earlier disclosure of add-on fees during flight booking.
    Trade group Airlines for America, and Alaska, American, Delta, Hawaiian, JetBlue and United airlines argue the DOT exceeded its legal authority when it published the rule.
    Airlines for America said in a statement to CNBC the rule will “confuse consumers” and “complicate the buying process.”

    Aerial view of United Airlines passenger planes docked in a terminal of Newark Airport in Newark, New Jersey, on May 11, 2024. 
    Charly Triballeau | Afp | Getty Images

    Major airlines and an industry trade association asked a federal appeals court to toss out a new Department of Transportation rule requiring earlier disclosure of add-on fees during flight booking.
    The challengers — trade group Airlines for America, and Alaska, American, Delta, Hawaiian, JetBlue and United airlines — argue the DOT exceeded its legal authority when it published the rule, in late April, and that the rule is “arbitrary, capricious” and an “abuse of discretion.”

    The petition for review was filed in the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals late Friday.
    The Biden administration introduced the airline fee disclosure rule in September 2022. It requires airlines and online travel agencies to disclose fees for seat selection, checked baggage and other add-ons upfront alongside the airfare, rather than adding the costs at checkout based on a customer’s selections.
    “You should know the full cost of your ticket, right when you’re comparison shopping,” President Joe Biden said at the time.
    Airlines for America said in a statement to CNBC on Monday that the rule will “confuse consumers” and “complicate the buying process.”
    “Airlines already provide consumers with complete disclosure of all fees associated with air travel before they purchase a ticket,” the group said in the statement. “DOT’s attempt to regulate private business operations in a thriving marketplace is beyond its authority … The DOT ancillary rule is a bad solution in search of a problem.” More

  • in

    Media companies look to woo advertisers as spending shifts to digital

    Media giants including Netflix, Disney, NBCUniversal and Warner Bros. Discovery will try to charm advertisers during their annual Upfronts events this week.
    The Hollywood writers and actors strikes are over, meaning Upfronts will likely be star-studded once again.
    But the industry is still in a moment of disruption. Companies have cut back on spending, some are bundling their services, and the future of the NBA media rights remains unclear.

    Kevin Mazur | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    Media giants are making their annual pitches to advertisers this week against the backdrop of significant disruption in the industry.
    The Hollywood writers and actors strikes are over, meaning Upfronts will likely be star-studded once again, major cost cutting is largely in the rear view mirror and streaming has fully embraced advertising models. Still, this year’s Upfronts presentations come in the midst of further tumult for the industry.

    “It does feel like this is a moment, a moment in terms of what the next year, two years will bring,” Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav said during the company’s earnings call last week. “I said a while back that this is a generational disruption.”
    Here’s what will likely be topics of discussion during Upfronts week, whether it’s on stage, in the audience or in private.

    Advertising rebound? That depends

    Media companies just finished reporting quarterly earnings, which showed traditional TV is still lagging behind streaming and digital when it comes to ad revenue.
    Traditional TV ad buying during Upfronts is expected to increase about 1% to $18.79 billion this year, according to data from eMarketer. This is an improvement from last year when it was down about 4% to $18.64 billion.
    Meanwhile, digital advertising spend during the Upfronts and Newfronts — which take place a few weeks ahead of the traditional media events — is expected to increase nearly 32% to $16.45 billion this year, according to eMarketer.

    There was a general improvement in traditional TV ad revenue last quarter, down 8% as opposed to nearly 16% in the same quarter last year, according to a note from Macquarie senior media tech analyst Tim Nollen. Streaming advertising was up 22% across media companies, and now makes up 18% of total advertising.
    Tech companies including Snap, Roku, Google and Microsoft each saw digital advertising revenue make a comeback this past quarter. And Netflix, Amazon and Alphabet’s YouTube all have growth stories to tell advertisers.

    People passing billboard posters for the Netflix television series The Crown in Waterloo on 17th November 2022 in London, United Kingdom.
    Mike Kemp | In Pictures | Getty Images

    “Netflix is in many respects the gold standard when it comes to streaming,” Disney CEO Bob Iger said during the company’s earnings call this month.
    Netflix ended last quarter with about 270 million global subscribers, riding a wave of password-sharing-freeloaders-turned-paying-customers during the past year.
    The company has leaned on its cheaper, ad-supported tier — at $6.99 per month in the U.S. — to coax price-conscious subscribers to pay monthly subscription fees. As of January, a little more than a year after its launch, Netflix’s ad-supported tier had more than 23 million monthly active users. 
    Amazon Prime Video debuted its advertising tier earlier this year. Amazon has spent billions on live sports rights – coveted advertising real estate – in recent years, including paying about $1 billion per year to stream “Thursday Night Football,” one of the National Football League’s season-long packages of games. Amazon reported last month that its advertising revenue jumped 24% in the first quarter to $11.8 billion.
    YouTube’s first-quarter advertising revenue also surged more than 20% to $8.1 billion, surpassing analyst estimates. In February, YouTube became the most-watched streaming application for 12 consecutive months, according to Nielsen.
    Amazon will hold its Upfront presentation on Tuesday in New York City, with Netflix and YouTube following a day later.

    Legacy lags

    Tom Hiddleston stars as Loki in the Disney+ series “Loki.”

    The vibe may not be as positive among some of the traditional media players.
    Domestic advertising for Comcast’s NBCUniversal was flat in the first quarter at about $2 billion, but streaming service Peacock was lifted by ad revenue. NBCUniversal will kick off upfronts week Monday at Radio City Music Hall.
    Disney reported a first-quarter decline in advertising revenue for its traditional cable networks and at Hulu, though ESPN domestic ad sales increased by more than 20% in the quarter versus the prior year. Disney will hold its presentation Tuesday.
    “The challenge, obviously, in the advertising market right now is there’s a lot more supply in the market, largely as a result of one of our competitors entering the ad tier,” said Disney CFO Hugh Johnston during this month’s earnings call. “But that said, I think generally speaking we feel like we’re in a better place than we were a year ago.”
    Warner Bros. Discovery, which is holding its presentation at Madison Square Garden on Wednesday, reported traditional TV advertising revenue fell 11% last quarter from a year earlier to about $2 billion. Streaming advertising revenue jumped 70%, but the overall number is much lower — just $175 million.
    Warner Bros. Discovery and Disney announced last week they would offer their streaming services — Max, Disney+ and Hulu — together, marking the first streaming bundle of major services. The two companies, along with Fox, are also working on a sports streaming joint venture. It remains to be seen what other companies join the fray in bundling.

    Sports draw interest

    Sports remain the glue of the TV bundle, still beckoning the largest audiences. And in the background of conversations during Upfronts week is the future of the NBA rights.
    While Warner Bros. Discovery owns them until the end of the 2024-25 season, the next owner is currently being sorted out. NBCUniversal has emerged as an apparent top contender while Warner Bros. Discovery mulls if it’ll match NBC’s offer.
    The future of the regional sports networks also remains a question, and broadcasters have been slowly snapping up rights to local games.

    Los Angeles Lakers forward LeBron James, #23, during the NBA game between the Los Angeles Clippers and the Los Angeles Lakers at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles on Jan. 7, 2024.
    Jevone Moore | Icon Sportswire | Getty Images

    EMarketer Senior Analyst Ross Benes noted that in order for Warner Bros. Discovery to add value to its sports joint venture with Disney and Fox, it needs to retain its NBA rights.
    “Without NBA rights, WBD will become a weak third leg on the sports JV tricycle…If it loses the NBA, many WBD’s customers will be left wondering what all the cost-cutting was for,” he said.
    Fox Corp., which holds its Upfront on Monday, said first-quarter ad revenue was down compared to the prior quarter when it aired the Super Bowl on its broadcast network. CEO Lachlan Murdoch said on last week’s earnings call that ad trends are “clearly moving in the right direction” in early Upfront discussions, thanks in large part to Fox’s sports slate.
    Like last year, Paramount Global skipped holding an Upfront presentation this year. Instead, the media company held nine events beginning in April in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York.
    Although there wasn’t a big presentation at Carnegie Hall, the events still included sneak peaks of upcoming content and featured A-listers like Nicole Kidman, Demi Moore, Stephen Colbert, Tony Romo, and others.
    Paramount is grappling with an ongoing sale process and is also currently without a singular CEO.
    Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of CNBC. More

  • in

    Shein’s U.S. charm offensive and IPO could hinge on NRF membership. So far, it’s been rejected

    Shein has attempted to become a member of the National Retail Federation, the industry’s largest trade association, numerous times but has been rejected, CNBC has learned.
    The fast fashion company, founded in China, has been trying to convince lawmakers it can be trusted as it faces scrutiny over its supply chain and its use of a specific tariff law loophole: the de minimis provision.
    If Shein can earn a stamp of approval from the NRF, it would be a form of validation for the retailer and could help legitimize it in the eyes of U.S. lawmakers.

    A sign hangs outside the Shein warehouse in Whitestown, Indiana, on Nov. 29, 2023.
    Scott Olson | Getty Images

    Chinese-founded fast fashion behemoth Shein isn’t just working to win over lawmakers in Washington, D.C., as it gears up for a potential U.S. IPO, it’s also trying to win over the broader U.S. retail industry.
    It’ll have to go through the National Retail Federation first. 

    Shein, which filed to go public in the U.S. late last year, has tried to become a member of the retail industry’s largest and most powerful trade association but has been repeatedly rejected, people familiar with the matter told CNBC. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because the talks are private. 
    For most companies, becoming a member of the NRF wouldn’t have a major impact on their business. The organization is the retail industry’s primary lobbying machine in Washington, D.C., and provides access to NRF events and research on market trends, among other benefits.
    But Shein is in the midst of a charm offensive. It has been working to convince lawmakers that it can be trusted as a public company listed on American exchanges despite concerns over its ties to China, its supply chain and its use of a trade law loophole.
    Shein is also caught in the middle of a complex geopolitical rivalry between the U.S. and Beijing and has been targeted by lawmakers who are concerned the company shares data on American consumers with the Chinese government and produces goods made with forced labor. The intense scrutiny Shein has faced reportedly pushed the retailer to consider going public in London instead of the U.S.
    Shein was recently valued at $66 billion, CNBC previously reported, and is poised to be one of the biggest listings of the year. It pulls in revenue well above $30 billion a year, according to a key retail partner. Its rise has eaten into the market share of a host of U.S.-based rivals including Gap Inc., TJX Companies and Macy’s, and has challenged mass-market players like Target, Walmart and Amazon.

    If Shein can earn a stamp of approval from the de facto voice of the retail industry, which is led by the largest retailers and tech companies on the planet, it could help legitimize Shein in the eyes of federal lawmakers. It could also smooth over what’s been an otherwise bumpy path to a U.S. initial public offering. 
    “That definitely would put a little bit more pressure on the politicians to accept the company, right? Simply because the peers recognize the company and they think that it is a worthy competitor. … That would definitely create a little bit more legitimacy,” said Wharton School professor John Zhang, founding director of the Penn Wharton China Center. “Most importantly, I think that [NRF membership] really creates the perception amongst the investors that this is just one of the normal retailers.” 

    National Retail Federation CEO Matthew Shay speaking at a press conference for the lobby group’s “Fight Retail Crime Day.”
    Courtney Reagan | CNBC

    Steve Dennis, a retail consultant who previously held executive positions at Neiman Marcus and Sears, agreed that NRF’s acceptance of Shein could be a positive catalyst for the company. 
    “I don’t think that would automatically mean the [New York Stock Exchange] or the federal government’s going to be OK with them, but I think it would be kind of a feather in their cap, a meaningful step in the right direction,” said Dennis. “You sort of look at the NRF as being the voice of the industry, so if it’s OK with them, maybe it should be OK for us.” 
    The NRF hasn’t totally shut the door on Shein’s membership application and has been in talks with the retailer about its request, people familiar with the dynamic told CNBC, adding the trade group is open to welcoming Shein. 
    A spokesperson for the NRF said the organization “does not comment on our membership process or on individual retailers.” It said it “disagrees with many of the characterizations” in CNBC’s report but declined to elaborate further.
    Shein declined to comment.

    Open to all 

    It’s unclear why the NRF rejected Shein’s membership application, but according to one of the people familiar, someone with sway is strongly against the company’s admittance. The person declined to provide specifics surrounding who could be exerting that influence.
    The NRF’s board has a leadership team and an executive committee. Those people have the closest counsel with the trade group’s CEO, Matthew Shay, who has been involved in membership discussions with Shein, according to two people familiar with the organization’s dealings.
    The leadership team is comprised of Shay; Walmart U.S. CEO John Furner; BJ’s Wholesale Club CEO Bob Eddy; and Mike George, the former president and CEO of Qurate Retail, which owns QVC. The executive committee includes eight other top industry insiders, including Target CEO Brian Cornell and Macy’s CEO Tony Spring.
    Like most trade associations, retailers looking to become a member of the NRF are typically granted access as long as they’re involved in retailing and pay the required dues, according to three NRF board members who spoke to CNBC on the condition of anonymity. 
    The specific requirements for becoming a member of the NRF and the process for screening new members is unclear. The NRF declined to answer questions about those details.
    An NRF membership application form that can be found online states: “Companies principally engaged in retailing are eligible for membership in the Federation.” The form includes questions about a retailer’s annual sales volume and total number of retail units and explains that NRF bylaws requires that members pay dues “based on total annual sales as reported in the most recent fiscal year.”

    The NRF said the form is outdated by about a year but declined to say what, if any, material changes had been made to the membership form since the document was uploaded online. 
    The board members who spoke to CNBC, who each have years of experience on the NRF’s board, said Shein’s membership application hadn’t come up in board meetings and that they aren’t involved in deciding which companies are granted access. This suggests top NRF brass would be the ultimate decision makers on prospective members.
    “There are quiet conversations that will happen around topics like this. As part of our governance, we certainly look at membership, overall trends, we talk about membership proposals and new additions, but we don’t typically get into specifics around individual companies,” one of the board members said. 
    Two of the board members said they weren’t aware of any instances where the NRF denied a retailer membership. One noted the trade group is actually trying to grow its ranks and has worked to expand into nontraditional markets, including the tech sector. 
    “I don’t think they are in the business of turning anyone down,” one of the board members told CNBC. 

    On a charm offensive 

    Every year, the NRF hosts a massive conference in New York City dubbed “Retail’s Big Show” that features the industry’s top companies. In recent years, Shein has been conspicuously absent from the event. 
    That’s not to say that Shein isn’t relevant to NRF’s attendees — the impact the company has had on the fashion industry was widely discussed by conference goers and during official sessions — but the retailer wasn’t invited to talk about the strategies that drove its meteoric rise. 
    At the NRF’s Big Show in January, there was a panel about Shein and Chinese retailer Temu titled “Coming to America: What Can We Learn from Chinese Brands in the U.S.” that was led by retail experts from Publicis Groupe and Coresight Research. 
    During the panel, the two experts reflected on the strategies that have fueled Shein’s growth and outlined the “10 essential actions” retailers need to do “to rival Shein and Temu.” Throughout the event, attendees eagerly raised their phones in the air to snap photos of the slides. 

    Visitors enter the venue at The NRF 2020 Vision: Retail’s Big Show, held in New York, the United States, Jan. 12, 2020.
    Wang Ying | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

    Meanwhile, at retail conferences elsewhere in the world, Shein has been a constant. Over the last year, the company had a presence at a number of high-profile industry conferences, including the OMR Festival in Hamburg, Germany, the Global E-commerce Leaders Forum in Los Angeles, the World Retail Congress in Paris and even the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, according to LinkedIn posts and conference agendas. 
    In March, Shein presented at the annual Shoptalk conference in Las Vegas for the second year in a row and a company executive appeared on stage alongside counterparts from sustainable fashion brand Reformation and home goods retailer Wayfair. 
    While Shein has been widely welcomed on stage at these events, which rely heavily on sponsors to drive revenue, the reception was a bit cooler behind closed doors. 
    At a cocktail party on the sidelines of Shoptalk, a young founder of a fashion sustainability startup quietly referred to Shein as their “mortal enemy” when they saw two of its staffers join the event. 
    The founder was referring to some of the sustainability concerns that Shein has faced, including accusations that its cheap clothing fuels overconsumption and that its clothes are made with materials sourced from regions that are hot spots for forced labor. 

    Shoppers Ashley Sanchez, center, of Fontana, poses for her friend Joscelin Flores, not pictured, who was taking photos with their bags of merchandise after being among the first group of shoppers taking the opportunity to shop on the opening day of fast fashion e-commerce giant Shein, which is hosting a brick-and-mortar pop up inside Forever 21 at the Ontario Mills Mall in Ontario Thursday, Oct. 19, 2023. (Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
    Allen J. Schaben | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    Dennis, the retail consultant, posited the NRF’s concerns about Shein, at least on their face, could be related to some of the ethical questions surrounding the company but said what angers the retail community the most is how Shein is competing — and taking market share. 
    “Their growth is extraordinary, right? … They’ve gone from zero to an enormous amount of market share in just a couple of years, so from that standpoint, if you’re a company that competes with them, you’re losing market share,” said Dennis. “Nobody likes that.” 
    Plus, he added, there is the perception that Shein is competing unfairly because of its use of a specific U.S. tariff law loophole called the de minimis provision. Under the provision, packages valued under $800 are not charged import duties and aren’t subject to the same level of screening as other packages. Shein’s success is routinely attributed to the claim that it benefits from not paying tariffs, a charge the retailer denies. 
    For example, in 2022, Gap, H&M and David’s Bridal paid $700 million, $205 million and $19.5 million in import duties, respectively, while Shein and Temu paid nothing at all, according to the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. 
    The committee is investigating Shein over its use of the de minimis provision and concerns that the goods the company ships to the U.S. are made with forced labor. Shein has said that it’s committed to adhering to the laws and regulations of the respective markets that it operates in and is working to eradicate its supply chain of raw materials sourced from banned regions.

    Competing fairly

    Considering the ire the retail community has for Shein, the NRF is stuck between a rock and a hard place. If the trade group accepts Shein as a member, it could upset its influential member base, but it also needs a valid reason to deny the company access. 
    The NRF could lean on the serious ethical concerns surrounding Shein, but they’re not unique to the company. Last year when the committee on the CCP opened a probe into Shein about its use of forced labor, it sent similar letters to Adidas and Nike, whose vice president of global retail operations was on the board of the NRF’s foundation in 2022. 
    Plus, using raw materials from regions that are hot spots for forced labor or other human rights issues is a problem for the entire fashion industry. It’s also an issue that has mired other global corporate powers that are on the NRF board. 
    Rejecting Shein on the grounds that it unfairly uses the de minimis provision would also be a tough sell. While many NRF members are strongly against de minimis, or at least a competitor’s use of it, the NRF has yet to take a firm position on the matter, contrary to some other trade associations.
    When asked for the NRF’s official position on de minimis, a spokesperson said it didn’t have one. 
    “We encourage the collection of more detailed information by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to improve enforcement and ensure that only legitimate products are entered under the program,” the spokesperson said. 
    Of course, Shein’s ties to China could be enough to exclude it from NRF membership, but the trade group is considering expanding internationally, according to one of the organization’s board members. If those plans come to fruition, the trade group will have to determine where to draw the line. 
    Absent a clear reason for excluding Shein from membership, the NRF’s decision could raise antitrust concerns, legal experts said. 
    While joining the NRF is unlikely to make or break a retailer’s business, it is seen as having a plus side. The benefits of NRF membership — advocacy, legislative lobbying and access to industry research, connections and events — could be seen as a competitive edge for its members.
    Considering that argument, if Shein were to be excluded from an organization made up of its competitors, it could have an antitrust argument. 
    “If they are a unique competitor and the powerful people in the industry are controlling the NRF to keep them out, that could raise concerns,” said Steven Salop, professor emeritus of economics and law at Georgetown University’s Law Center. “The question is whether it’s enough to have a significant impact on competition.”

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    NHL’s Coyotes CEO, other Latino executives launch platform to promote Hispanics in sports

    Arizona Coyotes CEO Xavier Gutierrez is partnering with three other Latino executives to found Latinos in Sports, a platform designed to promote Hispanic advancement in sports.
    The new venture launched its first event in Miami last week.
    The founders of Latinos in Sports want the organization to facilitate commerce in Hispanic businesses and to introduce Hispanic talent to Latino and non-Latino sports leaders.

    Xavier Gutierrez, CEO of the Arizona Coyotes and CEO of ImpactX Sports Group (L), and Pedro Guerrero, CEO of Guerrero Media.
    Courtesy: Guerrero Media

    When the National Hockey League’s Arizona Coyotes sold its franchise to Utah last month, the league didn’t just lose an Arizona-based team — it also lost its only active Latino chief executive.
    Born in Guadalajara, Mexico, Xavier Gutierrez became the Arizona team’s CEO in 2019 after Alex Meruelo, a Cuban-American billionaire, bought the Coyotes a year earlier. Gutierrez had previously been a managing director at private equity firm Clearlake Capital Group and knew Meruelo for about a decade before becoming the NHL’s first-ever Latino CEO.

    It took a Latino owner to hire a Latino CEO, Gutierrez explained in an interview, because Hispanics are not well-represented in leadership positions in professional sports.
    There are 153 major professional sports franchises in the U.S. and Canada across the NHL, the National Football League, the National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball and Major League Soccer.
    Gutierrez, who is technically still CEO of the Arizona Coyotes even though the franchise is inactive, says he is the only non-owner Latino CEO. Jorge Mas, co-owner of the MLS’ Inter Miami CF who is also CEO, makes for two Latino CEOs, according to Gutierrez.
    That is something Gutierrez vows to change. He is part of the founding group behind Latinos in Sports, a platform dedicated to bringing together Latinos and non-Latinos in professional sports, media and marketing to showcase Latino talent in leadership positions. CNBC is the official media partner of Latinos in Sports.
    “The results speaks for themselves that you don’t have that leadership today,” Gutierrez said. “You look at the commissioners and their offices that are relying on Latino consumers to be the viewers, the ticket buyers, the jersey buyers. I think you need to have Latino talent in those seats. Our goal is just to say, ‘Listen, this isn’t because you’re bad people. That’s not it at all. It’s because maybe you haven’t met the cohorts that exist.'”

    Gutierrez and Pedro Antonio Guerrero, the CEO of executive advancement company Guerrero Media, introduced Latinos in Sports at an event in Miami last week.
    Vianni Lubus, head of audience and engagement at Guerrero Media, and Mike Valdes-Fauli, chief operating officer at Chemistry Cultura, a digital advertising firm focused on Latinos in the U.S., are also involved with the platform.
    The four executives share a goal to increase U.S. Hispanic representation throughout leadership roles in sports. José Feliciano, the co-founder of Clearlake Capital and co-owner of the Premier League’s Chelsea Football Club, also spoke at last week’s Miami event to promote more Latino ownership in sports.

    José E. Feliciano speaks onstage during the 2021 Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Ripple of Hope Award Gala in New York City on Dec. 9, 2021.
    Slaven Vlasic | Getty Images

    “My fervent hope is that we make more progress on the ownership front,” Feliciano said. “Decision-makers in seats of influence are starting to recognize that Latinos can and should be owners in every sense of the word.”
    The goal of Latinos in Sports is to be the go-to place to foster a culture of Hispanic advancement in the industry of sports, Gutierrez said. The executives hope to turn the platform into a business that focuses on investment in Hispanic-founded startups, conducting research on U.S. Hispanic trends and bringing together both Latino and non-Latino sports leaders for networking.
    “You do deals with people you know,” Gutierrez said. “It’s really going to be a place for commerce, for talent acquisition, for conversation, data and insights.”
    The organization also hopes to push Latino sports executives to make more conscious decisions about appealing to Latino audiences.
    Warner Bros. Discovery debuted an alternative broadcast during last year’s MLB playoffs called “Peloteros,” which featured former and current Latino baseball players speaking to a Hispanic audience. The broadcast had to be in English because Warner Bros. Discovery does not have the Spanish-language broadcast rights.
    Having more Latino executives making content decisions can help draw in audiences that have largely been ignored, said Luis Silberwasser, chairman and CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery Sports.
    “It was a good example of what we’re striving to do in terms of diversifying content,” said Silberwasser. “You need diversity of voice in the production group to come up with this.”
    It is essential for Latinos in Sports to connect Latinos with non-Latinos, Gutierrez said, because non-Latinos are overwhelmingly in positions of leadership today.
    The organization’s next event will be at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York, in September during the U.S. Open tennis tournament. Gutierrez and Guerrero chose that event specifically because it traditionally appeals to white Americans.
    “It’s important to have non-Latino decision-makers in the room,” Gutierrez said.
    “Latinos need to connect with each other to build partnerships like this one in an effort to build our table,” Guerrero said. “At the end of the day, it’s the priority of a lot of Latinos in positions of power like Xavier [Gutierrez]. The key for us is to grow our population size.” More

  • in

    Sweetgreen, Chipotle and other fast-casual chains are bucking the consumer slowdown

    Chipotle Mexican Grill, Wingstop and Sweetgreen all beat Wall Street’s estimates for their quarterly same-store sales growth.
    Fast-casual restaurant chains haven’t seen the same consumer slowdown as the broader industry.
    Their customers tend to have higher income and are benefiting from the perception that they’re a better value.

    A food delivery messenger carries a take-out bag outside a Sweetgreen in Manhattan, New York City, on Sept. 14, 2023.
    Jeenah Moon | The Washington Post | Getty Images

    High-income consumers helped Chipotle Mexican Grill, Wingstop and Sweetgreen report strong sales this quarter, bucking the broader consumer slowdown that’s been hurting other eateries.
    As a whole, the restaurant industry has seen sales slump and traffic decline as customers pull back their spending. McDonald’s, Starbucks and KFC owner Yum Brands were among the restaurant companies that reported a weak start to 2024.

    McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski said diners are hunting for deals and good value; the chain is working to introduce a $5 value meal, CNBC reported Friday. And John Peyton, chief executive of Applebee’s owner Dine Brands, said the steepest sales drop-off has come from customers making less than $50,000.
    Fast-casual chains appear to be the exception to the trend. The sector saw higher traffic growth than any other dining sector from November to February, according to GuestXM data.
    In general, customers of fast-casual chains tend to have higher incomes than those of the fast-food sector, insulating the segment somewhat from low-income consumers’ spending pullback. High-income consumers haven’t felt the same pinch as those in lower-income brackets.
    Wingstop saw its same-store sales soar 21% in the quarter. CEO Michael Skipworth told CNBC that Wingstop’s customer base used to be largely low-income customers but is now roughly three-quarters higher-income diners. He also credited the company’s success to growing brand awareness and its chicken sandwich, which often serves as an entry point for new customers.
    Similarly, most of Sweetgreen’s locations are in high-income neighborhoods, CEO Jonathan Neman said last year. On Thursday, the salad chain reported first-quarter same-store sales growth of 5% and raised its full-year outlook for same-store sales growth. Traffic was flat, but executives said bad weather and the inclusion of New Year’s Day and Easter hurt its business.

    Value counts

    Chipotle and other chains have also gotten a boost from consumers’ perception of their value as the cost of Big Macs and Whoppers rise.
    Last year, fast-food chains raised prices more dramatically than fast-casual chains, according to TD Cowen analyst Andrew Charles. While a bowl or salad from a fast-casual restaurant will still be more expensive than a burger or chicken tenders, the pricing gap between the two segments has narrowed.
    “You can see that fast casual is just a superior value for that consumer, given the quality of what they’re getting,” Charles said.
    For example, Chipotle’s quarterly same-store sales grew 7%, fueled by a 5.4% increase in foot traffic. The burrito chain has a strong perception of value among diners, CEO Brian Niccol told analysts on the company’s April 24 conference call. Chipotle executives have also previously emphasized that most of its customers come from higher-income brackets.
    Many fast-casual chains, including Chipotle and Sweetgreen, have also been trying to improve their “throughput,” an industry term that refers to how many bowls or salads their employees can make. That focus on efficiency means their restaurants’ service is getting faster — leading to more transactions, Charles said.

    Investors had already been betting that fast-casual chains would be an outlier in consumers’ eatery spending. Shares of Chipotle, Shake Shack and Wingstop have all risen at least 35% in 2024. And Sweetgreen’s stock has doubled in value in the same time, excluding its 34% increase on Friday alone. For comparison, the S&P 500 has risen roughly 9% so far this year.
    But there are still exceptions to the segment trend. For example, Portillo’s, known for its Italian beef sandwiches and Chicago-style hot dogs, said its same-store sales shrank 1.2% in the first quarter. The chain blamed the weak results on “miserable weather across the Midwest,” particularly at the start of the quarter.
    Likewise, Shake Shack said its quarterly traffic, which was negative, would’ve been flat if not for bad weather in January and February. The burger chain reported same-store sales growth of 1.6% but noted that the metric improved sequentially every month. In April, its same-store sales rose 4.9% year over year.
    Mediterranean fast-casual chain Cava isn’t expected to report its first-quarter results until May 28. But TD Cowen’s Charles said he’s expecting a stronger quarter for Cava, given its competitors’ performances.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Goldman Sachs and American Express are among the leading companies for working parents in 2024, new study shows

    Goldman Sachs, American Express and others top the list of best companies for working parents in a new study.
    Companies that best support parents offer 20 or more weeks of paid parental leave for both primary and secondary caregivers.

    Vadym Buinov | Moment | Getty Images

    Working parents, guardians or caretakers know the challenge of striking the delicate balance between work and care responsibilities.
    From paid parental leave to quality health-care coverage and equal pay that cover child care costs, it’s become a priority for workers to find an employer that recognizes parents have specific needs.

    With no federal oversight of workplace benefits like paid leave and caregiving policies, corporate leaders are being asked to take the lead.
    CNBC partner Just Capital looked through policy disclosures at America’s largest companies to find the best in the country at meeting these needs.
    “Americans are very clear about what they believe companies should prioritize: their workers,” said Alison Omens, president of Just Capital.

    Top companies for parents

    Goldman Sachs, American Express, Deckers Outdoor, S&P Global and Splunk are the top companies for parents in 2024, according to Just Capital’s research.
    All five companies offer the following benefits: 20 or more weeks of paid parental leave for both primary and secondary caregivers; parental leave parity for all caregivers; and backup subsidized dependent care for their employees.

    “What the pandemic uncovered and remains true today, is that for working parents, particularly for mothers who disproportionately provide caregiving, a key part is their paid parental leave,” said Omens.

    Courtesy: Lauren and Mario Washington

    S&P Global offers paid parental leave policies of 26 weeks. Company employees and married couple, Lauren and Mario Washington, told CNBC that taking parental leave together after welcoming their second daughter in 2021 had a profound impact on their family’s dynamic and well-being.
    “Those initial weeks seem fleeting, but they tangibly enhanced our family’s balance and relationship,” Lauren said. “Mario’s involvement helped our oldest daughter adjust from being an only child to a big sister and help me focus on nurturing our newborn and my own recovery.”
    The human resources profession, however, takes a different view regarding the impact of parental leaves on business. The more “direct cost,” according to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), is an employee’s pay over the course of the number of weeks that they are on leave. SHRM argues that employers already have salaries factored into budgets.
    The “indirect costs” are the loss of productivity during an employee’s leave, temporary replacement and cost of administering a paid leave program.
    “Paid parental leave is an expensive proposition,” said Yvette Lee, an HR knowledge advisor at SHRM. “But turnover of key talent may be even more costly.”
    Lee said the investment in paid parental leave and similar policies may make sense in the long run.
    Many companies have introduced measures to ensure equity in the workplace for all employees.
    Deckers Outdoor is targeting gender parity in leadership positions by 2030, and Goldman Sachs has set a hiring goal for women in both entry-level and senior management positions to reach 50% and 40%, respectively.
    “We invest in our success as a company by investing in our people,” said a spokesperson for S&P Global.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More