More stories

  • in

    FanDuel says Iowa-LSU game was its biggest betting event of all time for women’s sports

    Monday’s Elite Eight matchups garnered record betting on women’s sports.
    FanDuel tells CNBC that the Louisiana State University versus Iowa game was its biggest betting event of all time for women’s sports.
    The record betting comes as women’s sports have hit an inflection point.

    Caitlin Clark, #22 of the Iowa Hawkeyes, celebrates after beating the Lousiana State University Tigers 94-87 in the Elite Eight round of the NCAA Women’s Basketball Tournament at MVP Arena in Albany, New York, on April 1, 2024.
    Andy Lyons | Getty Images

    The superstar women’s college basketball matchups Monday night attracted more than just viewers — the games also set new sports betting records.
    FanDuel tells CNBC that the Louisiana State University versus Iowa game was its biggest betting event of all time for women’s sports.

    The record betting comes as women’s sports have hit an inflection point, reaching bigger audiences and garnering more interest than ever with the rise of once-in-a-lifetime superstar talent such as Caitlin Clark and increasing valuations of women’s sports franchises.
    ESPN says viewership of the women’s Sweet 16 was its most watched on record, up 96% from last year. Viewership is spilling over into the sportsbooks with record activity on women’s sports. Yet, with only 26% of bettors being women, according to the American Gaming Association, sportsbooks see the massive opportunity.
    Monday’s LSU-Iowa game featured a heated rematch between two storied franchises, household names Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese, plus coaching legend Kim Mulkey, whose leadership style has been capturing recent headlines. All that combined made it the No. 1 betting event Monday, ahead of all National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball and National Hockey League games, FanDuel said. The game garnered a 28% increase in handle over the 2023 Women’s National Championship game.
    The later matchup between the University of Connecticut and the University of Southern California was the third-highest of the day for the sportsbook as fans watched star Paige Bueckers score 28 points and grab 10 rebounds in UConn’s 80-73 win.
    “We have seen an incredible uptick in betting on women’s sports as fans show unprecedented interest, and we look forward to seeing how fans engage during the Final Four,” Karol Corcoran, senior vice president and general manager of FanDuel Sportsbook, said in an email.

    DraftKings says women’s basketball also dominated its sportsbook Monday night. The women’s basketball games were its top two events last night, ahead of every MLB and NBA game, a spokesperson told CNBC.
    The sportsbook said from a handle perspective, the games were on par with many NFL games from last season.
    BetMGM also had a big night, saying the Iowa-LSU matchup was its most bet-on women’s basketball game ever.
    “It was a special night for the game and for the sportsbook as we saw record handles in both pregame and live in-play action,” said Seamus Magee, trading manager at BetMGM.
    Looking ahead to the women’s Final Four, FanDuel says Iowa is a 2.5 point favorite over UConn and South Carolina is an 11.5 point favorite over NC State as the Wolfpack go for an upset.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Health insurer stocks slide as final Medicare Advantage rates disappoint

    Shares of U.S. health insurers fell after the Biden administration didn’t boost payments for private Medicare plans as much as the insurance industry and investors had hoped. 
    The announcement puts more pressure on insurers already grappling with high medical costs and uncertainty around claims processing after the ransomware attack at UnitedHealth Group’s tech unit.
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services late Monday said that government payments to Medicare Advantage plans are expected to rise 3.7% year over year.

    Shares of U.S. health insurers fell Tuesday after the Biden administration didn’t boost payments for private Medicare plans as much as the insurance industry and investors had hoped. 
    Shares of CVS Health fell more than 8% on Tuesday, while UnitedHealth Group’s stock slid nearly 7%. Shares of Elevance Health dropped more than 3% and Centene’s stock fell 6%. 

    Meanwhile, Humana’s stock fell more than 10%. The health-care giant is far more dependent on those private Medicare plans, known as Medicare Advantage, than its rivals. 
    The announcement puts more pressure on insurers already grappling with high medical costs and uncertainty around claims processing after the cyberattack on UnitedHealth Group’s tech unit. It also deals a blow to Medicare Advantage businesses, which have long driven growth and profits for the insurance industry.

    More CNBC health coverage

    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said late Monday that government payments to Medicare Advantage plans are expected to rise 3.7% year over year. That is effectively a 0.16% decline after stripping out certain assumptions baked into that rate, according to insurers and analysts. 
    That final rate is unchanged from an earlier proposal in January. Typically, the federal agency raises that rate from its initial proposal. 
    The closely watched rate determines how much insurers can charge for monthly premiums and plan benefits they offer, and ultimately, their profits.
    Medicare Advantage is a privately run health insurance plan contracted by Medicare. More than half of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in such plans, enticed by lower monthly premiums and extra benefits not covered by traditional Medicare, according to health policy research firm KFF. 

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Disney’s cinematic drought may have opened a door for activist investor Peltz

    Disney has struggled to return to the lofty box-office records of 2019 — and that may have helped open the door for its recent troubles with activist investor Nelson Peltz.
    The company has more recently seen six straight quarters of operating losses within its content sales business, in which its box office and home entertainment divisions reside.
    Disney’s recent struggles at the box office have become a key piece of fodder for Peltz’s Trian Fund Management as he seeks a board seat for himself and former Disney CFO Jay Rasulo.

    Harrison Ford returns as Indiana Jones in “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.”

    Disney has struggled to return to the lofty box-office records of 2019 — and that may have helped open the door for its recent troubles with activist investor Nelson Peltz.
    Just four years ago, the studio had seven billion-dollar films, which contributed to a global box-office haul of more than $13.2 billion. Its studio entertainment segment posted revenue of $11.1 billion and operating income of $2.69 billion that year.

    More recently, the House of Mouse has seen these revenues fall below $9 billion in both 2022 and 2023 as well as six straight quarters of operating losses within its content sales business, in which its box office and home entertainment divisions reside. A combination of pandemic shutdowns, dual Hollywood labor strikes and a failure to connect with audiences have lead to a bleak period for Disney’s theatrical business.
    Other than 2022’s “Avatar: The Way of Water,” which Disney acquired as part of its $71 billion deal for the majority of 21st Century Fox, the company has not had a movie generate more than $1 billion since the last Star Wars movies in 2019, according to data from Comscore. Sony produced and distributed “Spider-Man: No Way Home,” which made $1.9 billion, although Disney’s Marvel Studios did serve as a co-producer.
    Disney’s come close — with 2023′s “Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol. 3,” which tallied nearly $900 million at the global box office as well as 2022 titles “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” ($955 million), “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever” ($859 million) and “Thor: Love and Thunder” ($760 million).
    Yet, other big-budget franchise films have flopped. “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny” in 2023 generated $378 million globally, “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” secured $476 million worldwide, unusually low for a Marvel film (until “The Marvels” reached just over $200 million late last year) and Pixar’s “Lightyear” collected less than $250 million globally in 2022.

    Fodder for Trian

    Disney’s recent struggles at the box office have become a key piece of fodder for Trian Fund Management as Peltz seeks a board seat for himself and former Disney CFO Jay Rasulo. Peltz has been critical of the Disney board, stating it “lacks focus, alignment and accountability” and has failed to act as the company’s earnings, reputation and stock price have suffered.

    Disney shareholders will vote on board nominations at the company’s shareholder meeting Wednesday.
    As part of Trian’s white paper, released in early March, the fund listed “Wish,” “Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny,” “Lightyear,” “The Marvels” and “Haunted Mansion” as examples of recent commercial disappointments for the studio.
    “We are concerned with the current state of Disney’s studios and creative processes across the portfolio,” the white paper read.
    Peltz himself has publicly questioned what he’s called Disney’s “woke” content strategy. The company’s creative team has actively sought to create films and television shows centered on non-white and non-male characters as well as explore narratives outside heteronormativity.
    “People go to watch a movie or a show to be entertained,” Peltz said in recent interview with The Financial Times. “They don’t go to get a message.”
    In particular, he called out Marvel films that feature Black Panther, an African prince-turned-king, and Captain Marvel, a female U.S. Air Force pilot who gains extraordinary cosmic powers.
    “Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that? Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?” he said later in the Financial Times interview.
    The film “Black Panther” did not have an all-Black cast and “Captain Marvel” and “The Marvels,” in which Captain Marvel is the central character, did not have all-female casts.
    Peltz’s comments echo those made previously by former Marvel Entertainment Chairman and CEO Ike Perlmutter, who was ousted from Disney last year and is a friend of Peltz and a supporter of his proxy fight.
    Peltz has also taken particular issue with Disney’s failed succession plans and what he’s described as a disjointed streaming strategy.

    Disney’s side

    Storytelling isn’t the only factor in Disney’s recent dismal box office performance, however.
    During the pandemic, the company debuted animated films on streaming, and parents got used to the idea, denting box office sales.
    Disney also diluted its Marvel brand with too many Disney+ spin-off shows and theatrical sequels, according to CEO Bob Iger.
    And on top of it all Disney has had to contend with a rapidly changing consumer who needs more than just a nostalgic title to be lured away from their couch and into a cinema, especially as budgets tighten.
    Iger has addressed these theatrical concerns several times since returning to the helm of the company in late 2022.
    Last March, he told attendees at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference that he wanted Marvel to have more fresh content and to do fewer sequels, or at the very least, be more selective about which sequels it greenlights. He reiterated that sentiment in November during the DealBook Summit in New York, where he also said he would no longer tolerate his company’s partners and creative team prioritizing messaging over storytelling.
    “We have to entertain first. It’s not about messages,” he said.
    Change at Disney’s studios will take time, especially after shutdowns due to the writers and actors strikes of last summer hindered production. However, box office analysts foresee a solid turnaround coming for the company in 2026.
    The 2025 movie calendar wraps up with a third Avatar film in mid-December, meaning ticket sales will bleed into the following year. Then that summer starts with an Avengers team-up film, currently titled “The Kang Dynasty,” followed by a “Mandalorian” Star Wars movie over Memorial Day weekend. Another Star Wars film will round out Disney’s big year in December 2026.
    Those franchises’ track records suggest they could drive a staggering box-office haul.
    “Disney reached the absolute pinnacle in 2019 … boasting an assortment of films that perfectly placed the disparate puzzle pieces of Marvel, Pixar, Lucasfilm and Walt Disney Animation into a non-stop hit machine, and the result was the box office equivalent of the 100-year flood,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore.
    The 2026 slate also includes three untitled Marvel movie dates, an unnamed Pixar film, a Disney Animation film slated for Thanksgiving and six other Disney titles.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Bally’s shareholders wage battle over ownership, ‘unfunded development projects’

    Key investors are urging Bally’s special committee to turn down an offer from Chairman Soo Kim to buy the company at $15 per share.
    Dan Fetters and Edward King, well-known venture capitalists in the gambling industry, blame Bally’s stock price and market share decline on Kim’s focus on “moon shot” projects.
    Bally’s has announced plans to build Chicago’s first casino and a resort to replace the historic Tropicana on the Las Vegas Strip, as well as an effort to win a gambling license for a former Trump golf course in New York City.

    An exterior view shows the Tropicana Las Vegas at dusk on March 29, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada. 
    David Becker | Getty Images

    As the famous Tropicana in Las Vegas closes its doors Tuesday, its operator Bally’s Corporation is facing its own existential battle. At stake: ownership, its status as a publicly traded company and its highest-profile projects.
    Bally’s Chairman Soo Kim and Standard General, the private equity fund he founded, last month made a bid to take the company private at $15 per share. Prior to his offer, the stock was trading at around $10 per share. Standard General owns about 23% of Bally’s stock, it said last month.

    But some high-profile investors argue Kim is undervaluing the company — and so is the market, they say, because it’s lost confidence in the strategy and financial stability of the company.
    Dan Fetters and Edward King of asset management fund K&F Growth Capital sent a letter Tuesday to the special committee formed to review Kim’s proposal. The letter urged members to reject the proposal.
    Instead, Fetters and King propose a strategy that sends Bally’s back to its casino roots.
    Bally’s owns 16 casinos in 10 states plus an interactive business in sports betting, internet gaming and free-to-play games. It’s announced plans to build Chicago’s first casino and a resort to replace the historic Tropicana on the Las Vegas Strip, as well as an effort to win a gambling license for a former Trump golf course in New York City.

    The entrance to Bally’s Hotel & Casino, located adjacent to the Tahoe Blue Sports & Event Center, is viewed on February 12, 2024, in Stateline, Nevada. 
    George Rose | Getty Images

    Fetters and King contend that Bally’s should stay in its lane and quit wasting money on efforts that aren’t core to its business. They insist the company doesn’t know how to build or operate high-end casinos or online sports betting and internet gaming businesses, saying that spending on those projects is what has driven down the share price and market cap.

    The company’s stock is down almost 30% in the past 12 months.
    Kim “proposes to exploit this weakness and acquire Bally’s at a fraction of its fair value,” Fetters and King argue in the letter.
    “Moon shot bets on huge, unfunded development projects, failed U.S. online execution, casino resort properties underperforming its regional peers, an overlevered balance sheet with little near-term prospects for de-levering and irresponsible capital allocation decisions have driven the stock and bonds to a point of disinterest from the investing community,” the letter reads.
    The shareholders also take issue with Bally’s $69 million in shares repurchases during the fourth quarter.
    Standard General, for its part, said last month the proposed take-private deal “would allow the Company’s stockholders to immediately realize a premium price, in cash, for their investment and provides stockholders certainty of value for their shares, especially when viewed against the operational risks inherent in the Company’s business and the market risks inherent in remaining a publicly-listed company.”

    Divestment plan

    The letter from Fetters and King proposes bringing on a better-equipped partner for the Chicago casino. Hard Rock International, owned by the Seminole tribe in Florida, had also bid for a casino license there. But Bally’s won with a $1.7 billion commitment, which has since been trimmed to a $1.1 billion development. In March, Bally’s chief financial officer told Nevada regulators the company was looking for $800 million in financing for the project.
    Fetters and King also write that Bally’s would benefit from partnering on or selling altogether its Tropicana operations on the strip. The property, which opened in 1957, is closing its doors Tuesday and is headed for demolition. An integrated resort will be built adjacent to a new baseball stadium for Major League Baseball’s Athletics, set to move from Oakland to Las Vegas. Gaming real estate investment trust Gaming and Leisure Properties owns the site.

    An exterior view shows the Tropicana Las Vegas on March 29, 2024, in Las Vegas, Nevada. 
    David Becker | Getty Images

    Fetters and King say Bally’s should divest the New York City golf course and various tech businesses acquired to pursue sports betting and instead focus only on digital casino.  
    Bally’s market cap stands at little more than half a billion dollars. It has not been able to wage a competitive threat in any space except regional casinos, despite the power of its legacy brand. 
    Though K&F Growth Capital owns less than 1% of Bally’s stock, Fetters and King are well-known venture capitalists in the gaming industry and co-founders of blank check firm Acies Acquisition Corp. with Chris Grove and former MGM Resorts International CEO Jim Murren.
    This is the second time Kim has offered to take Bally’s private. In January 2022, he offered $38 per share when the stock was trading at $26.
    “We want to buy, and we disagree with the market,” he told CNBC at the time. “We think it’s gonna be worth a lot more in the near future.”
    — CNBC’s Jess Golden contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Why streamers are shrinking their content libraries

    In the face of profit pressures and growing competition for users, streamers have taken to removing content to avoid the residual payments and licensing fees.
    Narrowing content libraries naturally means a need for differentiation.
    Data from Fandom, which hosts more than 50 million wiki pages on entertainment properties, suggests where the major streaming platforms are best poised to specialize based on current viewership.

    Getty Images

    Every day the streaming landscape is looking more and more like the beast it sought to slay — cable.
    Looming talks of platform bundles come as major streamers push ad-supported plans, limit password sharing and lean into live sports coverage. The goal of exponential subscriber growth, fueled by pandemic lockdowns, has shifted. Wall Street wants profits.

    The key to that may be depth, not breadth.
    Last year many streaming services began shrinking their once-robust content libraries in order to pay smaller licensing fees. (Streamers must pay to license even their own film and TV shows, like when NBC forked over $500 million to buy back the rights to “The Office,” an NBC show, in 2019.)
    In the face of profit pressures and growing competition for viewers, streamers have taken to removing content to avoid the residual payments and licensing fees. That dynamic has split the major streaming companies into two camps: buyers and sellers.
    On one side is Netflix, Amazon and Apple — companies that agnostically license content from other studios to bolster their streaming libraries. Then there’s Disney, Universal, Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount, which rely on decades worth of legacy content to build out their own services and also generate capital by auctioning it off to the highest bidder.
    “The brands that are acquiring those titles are thinking about how to operate more cost effectively by not creating things but by buying licenses,” said Stephanie Fried, chief marketing officer at Fandom, the world’s largest platform for entertainment fans.

    The sellers get cash, while the buyers get content that has a track record of reliability and consumer value. That’s especially important for Netflix, which is a newer entrant in Hollywood, and as a result has fewer long-running, binge-able series. Just look at how NBC’s “Suits” took off on the service last year.
    Notably, Netflix is already profitable. Amazon and Apple have said they see streaming as additive to their overall businesses, not core to them. The rest of the major streaming players are still working toward profitability.
    Narrowing content libraries naturally means a need for differentiation.
    The initial bloom of new platforms over the last 15 years saw most entrants take an “everything to everyone” approach, attempting to become the only streaming service you’d need. That meant, besides the user interface, most streaming services began to look alike over time.
    Fried said this lack of distinction could ultimately be a negative as the landscape gets stretched thin. She suggested streamers look at the type of content their subscribers are consuming and pick up complementary shows and films that have not yet been licensed.
    That model has worked well for smaller streaming services like BritBox, which has a wide swath of British dramas, mysteries and period pieces; and Shudder, which centers on the horror genre.
    Netflix, for example, which has seen success from nostalgic sitcoms like “Friends” and “The Office,” could add on similar shows like Nickelodeon and Paramount’s “Fairly Odd Parents” and “Hey Arnold,” Disney’s “Boy Meets World” and “American Dad” as well as the NBC-owned “Saved by the Bell,” according to data from Fandom.
    Fandom, which hosts more than 50 million wiki pages on entertainment properties across television, film, gaming, comics and more, has a “really good sense of the overlap between all of these walled gardens,” Fried said.
    Original shows on Apple TV+ like “Severance,” “Defending Jacob,” “Home Before Dark” and “Servant” have enthralled and spooked viewers. That type of dark investigative thriller centered on character-driven narrative would pair well with the likes of Warner Bros. Discovery’s “The Leftovers,” Netflix’s “Haunting of Hill House” and the Disney-owned early seasons of “Twin Peaks,” Fried said.
    Over at Amazon Prime Video, subscribers have opted for action-packed shows like “The Boys,” “Jack Ryan,” “Reacher” and “Invincible” as well as high fantasy series “The Rings of Power” and “Wheel of Time.” Fandom’s data suggests shows like Netflix’s “Jupiter’s Legacy,” Warner Bros. Discovery’s “My Adventures with Superman,” Paramount’s “Mayor of Kingstown” and Disney’s “The Americans” would further engage the streamer’s audience.
    Similarly, Fandom’s data could tell streamers what types of shows they should invest in when looking to create new product.
    On Disney+, family entertainment is everything. Fried noted that Disney’s best opportunity to differentiate itself is to double down on being the leader in kids and family-friendly content. Disney-owned Hulu, meanwhile, has seen success with “feel good” 30-minute sitcoms and prestige dramas, Fandom’s data shows. NBC’s “Parks and Recreation” and the ’90s version of “Fresh Prince of Bel-Air” alongside Paramount’s “The Nanny” could serve Hulu audiences well, according to Fandom, along with Netflix’s “Queen’s Gambit” and “Black Mirror” and the BBC show “Orphan Black.”
    Universal’s Peacock is all about crime dramas and medical series, and Paramount+ is the place for viewers to get their sci-fi fix. At Warner Bros.’ Max, high-quality prestige shows have long been the bread and butter of HBO, and high fantasy entrants like “Game of Thrones” and “The Last of Us” have enticed younger audiences.
    Doing well and doubling down in certain segments means keeping your viewers for longer, Fried said: “When they’re thinking about cutting your service it’s like, ‘I can’t, because they have all of my X type shows.”
    Disclosure: Peacock is the streaming service of NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Why Japan Inc is no longer in thrall to America

    One of the most chilling moments in America’s post-war relationship with Japan occurred in Detroit in 1982. Two American autoworkers clubbed a Chinese-American man to death, mistaking him for a Japanese citizen they accused of stealing American jobs. A sympathetic judge gave them no more than a slap on the wrist. The verdict reflected a mood that in subsequent years extended to the highest level of government. Fearful of being overtaken by Japan as the world’s economic superpower, America wielded the crowbar. It imposed trade restrictions, sought to pry open Japan’s domestic markets and led international efforts to depreciate the value of the dollar against the yen. Only after Japan’s asset-price bubble burst in the 1990s did America leave it alone.You would think a new bout of protectionism in America, most recently the bipartisan attempt to block Nippon Steel’s $15bn acquisition of US Steel under the guise of safeguarding American jobs, would elicit a sense of déjà vu in Japan. But it is more complicated than that. In recent years one of the most important strategic partnerships in the world has done a switcheroo. Japan is embracing shareholder-friendly, pro-market reforms that have long been America’s thing. America is adopting the sort of industrial policies and protectionism that once defined Japan. This reveals a lot about the contradictions America faces as it attempts to build global alliances to counter China while pursuing business autarky at home. Japan’s approach makes more sense.Japan’s transition in just the ten years since Schumpeter lived there in the early 2010s is remarkable—and not only big-picture stuff such as rising interest rates and the surging stockmarket. As Japan struggles to offset the economic headwinds of depopulation, things are changing on the ground, too. Ask an optimist, and several aspects of Japan’s lost decades are fading from view.Sayonara deflation: not only are prices rising but Japan’s large firms recently agreed to the biggest wage increase in 33 years. Sayonara xenophobia: immigrant employment, though still small by Western standards, is rising. Sayonara cosy capitalism: firms, though still awash with cash, are targeting higher returns, conducting more takeovers and reaping the benefits of shareholder activism. “It’s endogenous. This is the elite of Japan saying if we don’t sweat our assets, we won’t be around,” says Jesper Koll, a veteran Japan-watcher. As usual Warren Buffett, who bought big stakes in Japan’s trading houses in 2020, invested shrewdly.There are several hisashiburis, or “long time no sees”, too. Japan is once again a trading power, with exports surging for the past three years (thanks in part to a cheap yen). Sales by its most valuable company, Toyota, have risen sharply in America this year; many car buyers favour the firm’s hybrid models over rivals’ electric vehicles (EVs). Japan is enjoying an industrial renaissance, especially in high-tech products such as semiconductors. In February TSMC, the world’s biggest chip manufacturer, opened its first factory in Japan less than two years after construction started. It has suffered big delays trying to do the same in America.So what does Japan make of America turning Japanese, in the bad old sense? The first blow to trust came in 2017 when Donald Trump withdrew America from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade treaty that America, Japan and ten other countries had painstakingly crafted partly to counterbalance China. Mr Trump’s successor, Joe Biden, doubled down on an America-first industrial policy. His Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) discriminated against firms from Japan and other places that lacked a free-trade treaty with America (Japan later signed a critical-minerals deal that provides its EVs with some of the tax incentives they had been denied.) Mr Biden’s opposition to the trans-Pacific steel merger has been a slap in the face. Not only were his protectionist arguments spurious. They came just as lawmakers were proposing to add Japan to a whitelist of strategic allies permitted to bypass America’s strict foreign-investment rules.Japan’s economy ministry will not go on the warpath against America as the Commerce Department did against Japan in the 1980s. For all its pro-market progress it is no paragon of capitalist virtue, deploying industrial policy to promote clean energy and chipmaking. America’s giant economy is growing fast, so Japan cannot afford to be too huffy. Its firms have pledged to invest billions in America to take advantage of the IRA. As for Nippon Steel, expect it to keep its head down and hope the merger brouhaha blows over after the presidential election in November. If Mr Biden’s pro-jobs stance helps him defeat Mr Trump, a protectionist to the marrow of his bones, Japan will sigh with relief.Yet the relationship is no longer one-sided. In the past America was not just Japan’s most important export market but also a guarantor of its safety under the US-Japan Security Alliance, a defence treaty. That protection remains vital. But in recent years, as threats from China and North Korea have grown, Japan has taken more of its defence into its own hands. It has decided to spend vastly more on powerful new weapons, such as cruise missiles. Its tech industry is hoping to play a bigger role in the West’s military supply chains. On April 10th Mr Biden and Japan’s prime minister, Kishida Fumio, will reportedly unveil the biggest upgrade to the security pact in decades when they meet at the White House.The Tokyo consensus America, for its part, needs Japan not just as a military partner in Asia. As Peter Tasker, another long-time Japan-watcher puts it, Japan is increasingly seen as the “non-China” leader in the region, and America relies on it as an economic counterweight to China. As more Asian countries move into Japan’s orbit, with luck they will emulate its new-found pro-trade pragmatism. That, after all, is the true American way. ■ More

  • in

    Two Warner Bros. Discovery directors resign after antitrust probe

    Steven Miron and Steven Newhouse resigned from the Warner Bros. Discovery board, effective immediately, the company said Monday.
    The resignation follows a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into whether the pair violated an antitrust clause that prohibits directors from serving simultaneously on the boards of competitors.
    Neither director admitted any violation and chose to resign, the company said.

    The exterior of the Warner Bros. Discovery Atlanta campus is pictured after the Writers Guild of America began its strike against the Alliance of Motion Pictures and Television Producers, in Atlanta, Georgia, on May 2, 2023.
    Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

    Two Warner Bros. Discovery directors, Steven Miron and Steven Newhouse, are resigning following a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into a potential antitrust violation, according to a company release Monday.
    The company said Miron and Newhouse, who were both appointed as directors in April 2022 as part of the WarnerMedia and Discovery merger, were being investigated as to whether their participation on the board was in violation of Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Act, which largely prohibits the same directors or companies from serving simultaneously on the boards of competitors.

    Miron is the CEO of privately held media company Advance/Newhouse Partnership and a senior executive officer at Advance, which invests in media and technology companies, according to the release. Newhouse is co-president of Advance.
    Both of their terms on the Warner Bros. board were set to expire in 2025.
    Rather than contesting the DOJ matter, the company said both Miron and Newhouse voluntarily elected to resign from their positions, effective immediately. Neither director admitted any violation.
    “We are proud to have played a role in the building of this great company and remain a large stockholder. We are disappointed to leave the Board, but wish to do the right thing for WBD,” Newhouse said in a statement.
    In a Monday evening statement, the DOJ said the conflicting company is Charter, a Connecticut-based media company which, similar to Warner Bros.’ streaming platform Max, provides video distribution services. According to the DOJ, Advance representatives held seats on both Warner Bros.’ board and Charter’s board.
    “Today’s announcement is a win for consumers,” Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Kades of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division said in a statement. “In enacting Section 8 of the Clayton Act, Congress was concerned that competitors who shared directors would compete less vigorously to provide better services and lower prices. We will continue to vigorously enforce the antitrust laws when necessary to address overreach by corporations and their designated agents.”

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Macy’s hasn’t closed 150 stores yet. But Target, Kohl’s CEOs already smell opportunity

    Macy’s is closing about 150 of its namesake stores across the country.
    It could put up to $2 billion in annual sales up for grabs for other retailers.
    Off-price chain T.J. Maxx and Kohl’s could benefit because they already count many Macy’s shoppers as their customers, according to Jefferies and Earnest Analytics.

    Macy’s hasn’t yet shut the approximately 150 stores it plans to close. But retail competitors already smell opportunity.
    In recent interviews with CNBC, Target CEO Brian Cornell and Kohl’s CEO Tom Kingsbury said the department store’s decision to shrink its footprint gives them a chance to increase their own sales.

    Off-price chain T.J. Maxx could pick up more business, too, since it carries similar merchandise and has stores near Macy’s locations that might shut, according to Jefferies.
    And many other retail names, including off-price chain Ross and department store rivals like Nordstrom could benefit from the closures, too. Those companies already count many of Macy’s shoppers as their customers, according to an analysis of credit card data by Earnest Analytics.
    Facing lackluster sales and pressure to improve its business, Macy’s announced in late February that it would close more than a quarter of its an approximately 500 namesake stores. With the wave of closures, the department store will join a list of retailers that have shrunk in size and created a void for other brands to swoop in. Those include Bed Bath & Beyond, which closed all of its stores after filing for bankruptcy, or others like J.C. Penney, a department store that is a fraction of its former size.
    Macy’s closures could put as much as $2 billion of market share up for grabs. The department store’s net sales were $23.1 billion in the most recent fiscal year, and it said the 150 stores that it’s closing account for less than 10% of sales.
    Yet Macy’s, for its part, has said closing the underperforming stores will help it focus on driving higher sales at other locations. Macy’s CEO Tony Spring said the company will open more locations of its higher-end department store Bloomingdale’s and beauty chain Bluemercury, which have both outperformed the company’s namesake chain. The closures will also free up capital to invest in its better-performing namesake stores.

    Macy’s has not yet said which locations will close and when exactly they will shutter, but said 50 stores will close by early 2025. The move will have implications for shopping malls, too, since Macy’s will close giant stores that are mall anchors.

    An opportunity for off-price chains

    Department stores have been losing market share for years as shoppers have chosen to shop at strip malls or online instead, said Corey Tarlowe, a retail analyst at equity research firm Jefferies. Beneficiaries have ranged widely from big-box stores like Target to specialty players like Abercrombie & Fitch, which has opened stores in major cities like New York.
    In an interview with CNBC in March, Target CEO Cornell said the retailer has gotten a leg up from other closures before. For example, he said, some of its stores are in former Toys R Us locations.
    Off-price retailers, in particular, have posed a major competitive threat to department stores — and been the big winners from their struggles, Tarlowe said. They sell a lot of discretionary merchandise like clothes, handbags and shoes, too, but often in more convenient locations and for a better price.
    “It’s kind of like the new department store in effect, but it’s much smaller,” he said. “They sell similar brands and similar products, but for 40% to 70% of the cost.”

    Signs are posted at the entrance to a Macy’s store that is set to close at Bay Fair Mall on February 27, 2024 in San Leandro, California. Macy’s announced plans to shutter 150 underperforming stores across the United States. 
    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    With Macy’s broad closures, TJX Cos.-owned T.J. Maxx, which includes its namesake stores, Marshalls and Home Goods, is especially well positioned. About 63% of Macy’s stores have a T.J. Maxx or Marshalls within a one-mile radius, according to an analysis by Jefferies.
    Off-price stores also draw a similar customer, which tends to be more affluent. About 47% of Macy’s shoppers have an annual household income of more than $100,000, compared with about 50% of shoppers who go to TJX-owned stores, Jefferies found. Only about 30% of Burlington shoppers and about 34% of Ross customers have an annual household income of more than $100,000, which may mean they have less overlap with Macy’s shoppers.
    “I used to see Toyota Camrys in parking lots at a T.J. Maxx and now I see BMWs, I see Mercedes, I’ll see Porsches,” Tarlowe said.
    He added that TJX stores are easier for shoppers to get to, with roughly 2,500 locations in the U.S. That is a much larger footprint than Macy’s, which will have approximately 350 namesake stores after the closures.

    Department store, big-box rivals see an opening

    Other rivals also have a high overlap with Macy’s customer base, which could position them well.
    About a third of Macy’s customers also shopped at Kohl’s during the prior 12 months, according to a late March credit card data analysis by Earnest Analytics. That was only surpassed by T.J. Maxx, which had 37% of Macy’s customers shop at its brands over the same period.
    In a recent interview with CNBC, Kohl’s CEO Kingsbury described Macy’s closures as a chance for the company to grow. He also said Kohl’s is the largest department store in the country with 1,174 stores, but has quality locations.
    “The beauty of Kohl’s is the fact that our stores are located in strip centers,” he said in an interview at Shoptalk, a retail conference in Las Vegas, in March. “It’s really a big deal. So we can bring the department store concept to the strip centers where you know a lot of the successful companies are located overall.”
    Yet Kohl’s faces similar struggles as Macy’s, as it grapples with softer discretionary spending and challenges with attracting a younger customer. Like Macy’s, it also projected that comparable sales, which takes out the impact of stores openings and closures, may not grow or will only rise modestly in the year ahead.
    Macy’s has also been trying to take a page from its competitors’ books. It’s opening up to 30 smaller stores in strip centers. And at many of its department store locations, it has added Backstage, an off-price shop inside of the bigger store.
    But in the places where Macy’s is leaving a void, Target may also be poised to open stores or gain customers. The Minneapolis-based company said last month that it plans to build more than 300 new stores over the next decade. It already has more than 1,950 stores across the U.S.
    Speaking to CNBC, Cornell did not say if the big-box retailer will open more stores near shuttered Macy’s. But, he added, it’s watching closely.
    “We’re always looking at the local market, the opportunities and we think there’s still going to be displacement within retail for years to come,” he said. “And with our capability and financial position, we can be one of the players that continues to lean in and take share and growth.”

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More