More stories

  • in

    Novo Nordisk says high-dose experimental obesity pill leads to 15% weight loss

    Novo Nordisk’s high-dose experimental obesity pill helped overweight or obese adults lose around 15% of their body weight, according to new late-stage clinical trial results. 
    Novo Nordisk’s pill is an oral version of semaglutide, the active ingredient in the company’s blockbuster weight loss injections Ozempic and Wegovy.
    The new data comes as the Danish pharmaceutical company fights to maintain its dominant position in the booming weight loss drug market, which is seeing new competitors such as Pfizer and Eli Lilly emerge.

    Liselotte Sabroe | Afp | Getty Images

    Novo Nordisk’s high-dose experimental obesity pill helped overweight or obese adults lose around 15% of their body weight, according to new late-stage clinical trial results.
    The Danish company presented the data at a diabetes conference Sunday. Novo Nordisk told Reuters it plans to file for Food and Drug Administration approval of the drug later this year.

    Novo Nordisk is fighting to maintain its dominant position in the booming weight loss drug market as new competitors such as Eli Lilly and Pfizer develop their own effective treatments.
    Novo Nordisk’s pill is an oral version of semaglutide, the active ingredient in the company’s blockbuster weight loss injections Ozempic and Wegovy. Semaglutide mimics a hormone produced in the gut called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when a person is full. 
    Novo Nordisk already has an FDA-approved oral semaglutide, which is marketed under the brand name Rybelsus for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. But the highest dose of Rybelsus is 14 milligrams, while the company’s experimental obesity pill has a far larger dose of 50 milligrams. 
    The phase three trial followed 667 obese and overweight adults who did not have Type 2 diabetes.
    Patients who took 50 milligrams of the pill once a day for 68 weeks saw an average weight loss of 15.1%, when they used it alongside diet and physical activity, according to Novo Nordisk. That’s compared with a 2.4% weight loss for patients who took a placebo.

    Around 85% of patients who took the pill lost at least 5% of their body weight, while only 26% of those who received the placebo did. 
    The weight loss also led to “improvements in physical functioning, allowing participants to have an improved quality of life for everyday activities,” Dr. Filip Knop, an endocrinology professor at the University of Copenhagen who worked on the study, said in a statement. 
    The new data suggests that the high-dose pill may be as effective as Novo Nordisk’s weekly Wegovy injection, which also resulted in roughly 15% weight loss after 68 weeks. 
    But a pill would serve as a far more convenient way to treat obesity. 
    Knop said offering the pill to the public would “allow people who struggle to lose weight with diet and physical activity alone to take this effective medication in a way that best suits them.”
    Other companies are also developing oral weight loss treatments to appeal to those who don’t want weekly injections. 
    Overweight or obese patients who took Eli Lilly’s experimental pill orforglipron lost 14.7% of their body weight after 36 weeks, according to midstage clinical trial results the company released Friday. 
    Pfizer is also developing its own weight loss pill, called danuglipron, which patients take twice a day.
    But the pharmaceutical giant on Monday said it would stop developing its other experimental oral drug, lotiglipron, due to elevated liver enzymes in patients.
    Companies started focusing more on the weight loss industry after Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic and Wegovy catapulted to the national spotlight in recent years.  
    Social media influencers, Hollywood celebrities and even billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk have reportedly used the popular injections to get rid of unwanted weight. 
    That popularity sparked widespread shortages and an increase in cheaper knockoffs of the drugs. 
    Shortages and other factors such as high out-of-pocket costs without insurance or unpleasant side effects have forced some people to stop taking Ozempic or Wegovy. Many users have complained of a rebound in weight that’s difficult to control.
    More than two in five adults have obesity, according to the National Institutes of Health. About one in 11 adults have severe obesity. More

  • in

    Red Sox owners buy Boston team in Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy’s golf league

    Red Sox owner Fenway Sports Group is buying the Boston team in a new golf league.
    TGL, developed by Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy in partnership with the PGA Tour, will begin competition in January.
    The news comes as the PGA Tour and Saudi-backed LIV Golf hammer out a merger after a long, contentious legal fight.

    Another sports powerhouse has joined the ownership ranks of the golf league being developed by Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy.
    Fenway Sports Group, owned and run by John Henry and Tom Werner, will be the second of six teams to join TGL, the primetime golf league set to begin competition in January.

    “We are excited for this new journey,” Henry and Werner said in an announcement Monday. “Through this new, tech-focused version of the game, New England sports fans will soon have a team of world-class PGA Tour players to cheer for and redefine for this community what it means to play the game in the modern era.”
    Fenway Sports Group owns several major sports franchises, including Major League Baseball’s Boston Red Sox, the Liverpool Football Club and the National Hockey League’s Pittsburgh Penguins. The FSG team is the second squad to be announced by TGL. On June 8, it announced that Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian, Serena Williams and Venus Williams became owners in a Los Angeles team.
    “The team at FSG is uniquely positioned to help build an expanding community for fans of golf and embracing that audience is foundational to the Boston’s TGL team’s mission,” said Mike McCarley, co-founder of TMRW Sports, which controls TGL.
    The development of TGL comes at a pivotal time for the big-money world of professional golf. Woods, McIlroy and McCarley founded TMRW Sports Group (pronounced “tomorrow”) last year in partnership with the PGA Tour. At the time, it was seen as a response to the Saudi-backed LIV Golf league, which was embroiled in a bitter legal fight with the PGA Tour.
    This month, however, the PGA Tour and LIV agreed to merge business interests to form a new company. McIlroy is one of the biggest public critics of LIV, and Woods reportedly rejected a massive offer to join the Saudi-funded league.

    Rory McIlroy shakes hands with Tiger Woods on the 18th green after they completed a practice round prior to the 2023 Masters Tournament at Augusta National Golf Club in Augusta, Georgia, April 3, 2023.
    Christian Petersen | Getty Images

    TGL will now try to capture a new, younger demographic using cutting-edge technology in primetime competitions that merge physical and virtual golf.
    The league will feature six teams, consisting of three PGA Tour players each, going head-to-head in match play in an arena in Palm Beach, Florida. The league has not yet announced a broadcast deal as it is in ongoing negotiations. That is expected to be finalized in the coming weeks, according to a source close to the matter.
    The star power of Woods and McIlroy has helped attract a handful of big names, including Justin Thomas, John Rahm, Collin Morikawa, Adam Scott, Justin Rose and Rickie Fowler.
    TGL hasn’t disclosed how much money it’s raised. Yet it has attracted many big name athletes as investors, including basketball greats Shaquille O’Neal, Stephen Curry and Kevin Durant; Formula 1 driver Lewis Hamilton; women’s soccer star Alex Morgan; and pro football’s Tony Romo and Josh Allen. Several professional sports team owners have invested, as well. More

  • in

    Pfizer to end development of experimental obesity pill due to elevated liver enzymes

    Pfizer said it would stop developing its experimental obesity and diabetes pill, lotiglipron, due to elevated liver enzymes in patients who took the drug in mid-stage clinical studies. 
    New York-based Pfizer said it will instead focus on its other oral obesity drug, danuglipron, which is in a fully enrolled phase two clinical trial. 
    Lotiglipron, danuglipron and Novo Nordisk’s blockbuster weight loss injections Ozempic and Wegovy are part of a class of drugs that’s piquing public interest.

    Pavlo Gonchar | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Pfizer on Monday said it would stop developing its experimental obesity and diabetes pill, lotiglipron, due to elevated liver enzymes in patients who took the drug once a day in mid-stage clinical studies. 
    Those elevated enzymes often indicate damage to cells in the liver, but the pharmaceutical giant said no patients experienced liver-related symptoms or side effects. 

    Shares of Pfizer were down about 3.5% in premarket trading following the news.
    New York-based Pfizer said it will instead focus on its other oral obesity drug, danuglipron, which is in a fully enrolled phase two clinical trial. 
    That study found that body weight was reduced after patients with Type 2 diabetes took high-dose versions of danuglipron twice a day for 16 weeks, according to results Pfizer released last month.
    The company expects to finalize plans for phase three clinical trial program on danuglipron by the end of 2023. Pfizer added that it is also developing a version of danuglipron that patients take once a day instead of twice. 
    “We look forward to analyzing the danuglipron Phase 2 results and selecting the dose and titration schedule that will maximize the therapeutic benefit and safety and tolerability,” William Sessa, Pfizer’s chief scientific officer of internal medicine, said in a press release. 

    Lotiglipron, danuglipron and Novo Nordisk’s blockbuster weight loss injections Ozempic and Wegovy are part of a class of drugs called glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists.
    They mimic a hormone produced in the gut called GLP-1, which signals to the brain when a person is full. 
    The drugs can also help people manage Type 2 diabetes because they encourage insulin release from the pancreas, lowering blood sugar levels.
    Oral drugs like Pfizer’s danuglipron could offer an advantage over frequent injections. Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are also developing their own experimental obesity and diabetes pills.
    The new class of obesity drugs is piquing public interest and causing a weight loss industry gold rush. But there’s still uncertainty about their accessibility, and questions remain about how long patients would need to take the drugs to keep unwanted weight off.
    Some people who stop taking the drugs complain about a weight rebound that is difficult to control.
    More than 2 in 5 adults have obesity, according to the National Institutes of Health. About 1 in 11 adults have severe obesity. More

  • in

    Storms, air traffic control facility delay thousands of flights

    The Federal Aviation Administration briefly halted departures to the Washington D.C.-area, citing repairs needed at an air traffic control facility.
    Close to 10,000 flights were delayed on Sunday, mostly due to weather.

    A Southwest Boeing 737 airplane takes off into a smoke haze from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia, June 8, 2023, as smoke from wildfires in Canada blankets the area.
    Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

    More than 9,600 flights were delayed and 1,405 canceled on Sunday as thunderstorms snarled air travel in and out of some of the country’s busiest airports and the Federal Aviation Administration briefly halted departures to major airports serving Washington D.C., citing repairs to a power panel needed at an air traffic control facility.
    Shortly after 6 p.m. ET, the FAA issued ground stops for Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and Dulles International Airport, preventing aircraft from taking off for those destinations. It lifted the orders within an hour.

    “Departures to D.C.-area airports have resumed and repairs to the communications power panel are complete,” the FAA said in a statement. “During the repairs, a back-up system handled communications safely.” Delays at Washington Dulles were averaging around 90 minutes as of 7:15 p.m.
    Another 7,200 U.S. flights were delayed on Saturday. Throughout Sunday, weather caused delays at airports from Miami to Boston to Detroit.
    More than 500 flights to and from Newark Liberty International Airport were delayed. The airport is a major hub of United Airlines, which had more than 1,159 delayed mainline flights Sunday, network-wide, 40% according to FlightAware. American Airlines posted 1,258 delayed flights, 36% of its mainline schedule, Delta Air Lines had 1,221, or 34% of its schedule, and New York-based JetBlue Airways had 579 delays, or 55% of its planned schedule. More

  • in

    Warner Bros. needs to stop copying Disney and let its superheroes fly solo

    The failure of “The Flash” should make Warner Bros. and DC Studios reconsider their newly adapted reboot plan.
    Marvel, owned by Disney, has cornered the market on shared superhero universes.
    DC has a better track record with movies and franchises focusing on a single hero.

    Ezra Miller stars as Barry Allen in Warner Bros.’ “The Flash.”
    Warner Bros. Discovery

    “The Flash” is a flop. “Black Adam” was a bust. And does anyone remember “Shazam: Fury of the Gods”?
    DC Studios needs more than a hero, it needs a new strategy – something different than even its recently established reboot plan.

    DC and its parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery, have Marvel Cinematic Universe envy. It’s easy to see why. The MCU’s movies, including ones that haven’t been released by Disney, have grossed about $30 billion worldwide since 2008. Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav has directed DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran to create their own shared universe involving iconic characters like Batman and Superman.
    The problem is, Warner Bros. and DC are already working through the tail end of a previous – and failed – attempt to tie their characters together through multiple films and shows. At the movies, DC’s Justice League just can’t measure up against Marvel’s Avengers.
    The likely answer to Warner Bros. and DC’s issues is right in front of them, though: Character-specific franchises that adhere to one filmmaker’s vision, not a TV-style writers room. Basically, let your heroes fly solo.
    It’s worked for DC properties before, even recently.
    Read more: Legacy media companies enter dark times as failures mount

    Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy, which wrapped in 2012, was a well-reviewed box office juggernaut. And even though they were both connected to the prior attempt at creating a DC movie universe, 2017’s “Wonder Woman” and 2018’s “Aquaman” focused mainly on their title characters and racked up big bucks and accolades in the process.
    To put an even finer point on it, look no further than the financial and critical success of Todd Phillips’ “Joker” and Matt Reeves’ “The Batman.” Neither movie is connected to an extended universe.
    “Joker,” released in 2019, grossed more than $1 billion worldwide despite being rated R, while racking up a best actor Oscar for star Joaquin Phoenix. Last year’s “The Batman,” starring Robert Pattinson as an early-career Caped Crusader, garnered around $750 million globally. Sequels to both movies are in the works.
    But so is “Batman: The Brave and the Bold,” from “Flash” director Andy Muschietti. It will not star Pattinson and will instead serve as “the introduction of the DCU Batman,” according to Gunn. How many different Batmen does an already-superhero-saturated moviegoing audience need? Especially after “The Flash,” which featured four different Dark Knights from previous movies and shows.

    Fun vs. homework

    Marvel Studios’ “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania.”

    Comic books were once a refuge from homework. Now, to keep up with everything going on in Disney’s MCU and Sony’s Spider-Verse, which is also connected to the MCU, you need to have watched pretty much everything that came before to get up to speed. That’s dozens of movies and shows, going back to the original Robert Downey Jr. “Iron Man.”
    “The Flash,” meanwhile, might be the most intense comic book movie pop quiz, even though DC’s cinematic universe has been all over the place. It’s jam-packed with cameos (some real, some CGI-generated) from past DC movies and shows, going all the way back to George Reeves’ black-and-white Superman.
    But in order to understand all the gags, you have to be really into this stuff. Unless you’re a big fan of “Clerks” director Kevin Smith – big enough of a fan to have watched his standup specials, that is – a “Flash” sequence involving a Nicolas Cage version of Superman fighting a giant spider might be lost on you. The movie’s punchline, involving George Clooney returning to the role of Bruce Wayne 26 years after the badly received “Batman and Robin,” is clearly geared toward Gen-Xers and older Millennials, not today’s younger audiences.
    Even the MCU model has tripped up at times. Disney CEO Bob Iger himself has suggested that the studio was going to the well too often with certain characters, after the fourth Thor film and third Ant-Man installment underwhelmed at the box office. That should be another warning sign for DC Studios.
    For his part, DC’s Gunn recently acknowledged that there are “too many” superhero movies and shows. If anyone can come up with a creative way to change course, it’s him.
    After working with schlock factory Troma Films early on, Gunn built a sturdy Hollywood career as a writer and director, alternating between R-rated flicks like “Slither” and stuff for general audiences, like his Guardians of the Galaxy movies for Marvel and Disney. The third entry in that series snapped the MCU out of its mini funk. It’s so far the second-highest-grossing movie of 2023, behind Universal’s “The Super Mario Bros. Movie.”
    And he already has a couple DC works on his resume: the 2020 movie “The Suicide Squad” and its 2022 companion series, “Peacemaker,” both of which won wide acclaim.
    Gunn is writing and directing “Superman: Legacy,” due in 2025. It’s intended to usher in the new DC shared universe. But there’s still time for him to reconsider his approach and let the Man of Steel – and all the other DC heroes – be super on their own.
    Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of Universal and CNBC. More

  • in

    Take a look inside the factory fueling candy giant Mars’ $1 billion ice cream ambitions

    Candy giant Mars has set a goal to reach $1 billion in global ice cream sales by 2030.
    The family-owned company is investing $70 million in its Burr Ridge, Illinois, factory to help it achieve its sales target.
    Mars aims to grow its share of the ice cream market as part of a broad-based business.

    Dove Ice Cream Bars are packaged at Mars’ factory in Burr Ridge, Illinois.
    Source: Mars

    Candy giant Mars is trying to make a name for itself in a new category: ice cream.
    The family-owned company aims for its ice cream business to reach $1 billion in sales worldwide by 2030. In May, Mars tapped executive Anton Vincent to lead its global ice cream business, adding to his existing role as president of Mars Wrigley North America.

    Mars faces tough competition to achieve its ambition in the U.S., but the company has been investing into the business. It has spent $50 million upgrading its Burr Ridge, Illinois, ice cream factory and earmarked an additional $20 million for the facility that it hasn’t spent yet.
    Mars has also been expanding its portfolio, rolling out new flavors such as M&M’s Cookies and Cream Ice Cream Cookie Sandwiches and Twix Cookie Dough Ice Cream. It used its $5 billion acquisition of Kind North America, best known for its nut bars, to push into plant-based ice cream substitutes.
    While summer is still the biggest season for ice cream sales, Mars is also trying to boost business in the fall and winter through a partnership between the National Football League and its Snickers Ice Cream Bar.
    Mars aims to grow its share of the ice cream market as part of a broad-based business. Outside of candy and ice cream, Mars also owns a large pet care segment and other food brands, including Combos Stuffed Snacks and Ben’s Original rice.
    The bet on ice cream has paid off for the company. In the last five years, Mars’ global ice cream sales have risen 42%. The Dove Ice Cream brand alone grew 12% last year. As the segment grows, the U.S. accounts for more than half the company’s ice cream business.

    As Mars injects resources into the ice cream business, the company will find out if its familiar brands are enough to carry it to its ambitious $1 billion sales target.

    Mars’ ice cream goals hinge on the old and the new

    Mars entered the ice cream category in 1986 when it bought Dove, then known just for its ice cream bars before the candy company expanded it into chocolate. Three years later, Mars introduced the Snickers Ice Cream Bar, now the top seller in its portfolio, followed by M&M’s Ice Cream Cookie Sandwiches.
    “We don’t have the biggest ice cream brands, but we do believe we have the biggest brands in ice cream,” Shaf Lalani, the U.S. head of Mars Ice Cream, told CNBC.
    Today, Mars ranks among the top 10 U.S. ice cream makers by retail sales, according to Euromonitor International data. But it is far outstripped by Haagen-Dazs owner General Mills; Ben & Jerry’s parent Unilever; and Blue Bell Creameries, which is privately owned.
    “Mars Inc. ice cream brands face hefty competition, being ranks away from the leading spot in the U.S. ice cream market,” said Carl Quash, Euromonitor’s head of food and nutrition research.
    As it tries to make up that ground, Mars’ primary strategy to grow its ice cream sales focuses on reversing what it did with Dove: taking other candy brands and turning them into frozen treats.
    “There’s about a 64% crossover rate to people that buy our confectionary products and participate in our brands, which has given us a lot of confidence that we have the right to win,” Lalani said.
    Outside of Snickers and M&M’s, Mars’ other candy brands show promise in their transition over to ice cream. Twix Ice Cream is the fastest-growing product in the company’s ice cream portfolio. Lalani thinks the frozen version of the Milky Way candy bar — known as the Mars bar outside the U.S. — has the potential to be its next big hit.
    While Lalani said Mars’ existing portfolio has plenty of runway, not all of Mars Ice Cream’s growth will be organic. Acquisitions will also help fuel sales and bring new customers.
    For example, Kind’s frozen treats entered Whole Foods a few months ago, adding a new retail chain to Mars’ frozen footprint.
    In December, Mars announced it was buying Tru Fru, a startup that makes frozen and freeze-dried chocolate-covered fruit. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

    Inside the ice cream factory

    Dove Bars are dipped in chocolate at the factory.
    Source: Mars

    Nearly four decades ago, when Mars bought Dove, it also purchased the brand’s manufacturing facility in Burr Ridge, Illinois. These days, the factory is responsible for making all the ice cream the company sells in the U.S., which accounts for 55% of its demand worldwide.
    As sales have accelerated, the company has had to invest in the sprawling facility to add capacity and the capability to make new products, such as Kind’s frozen treats studded with nuts. The factory has distinct lines dedicated to the types of products Mars makes: sandwiches, bars and sticks.
    Mars’ manufacturing process is largely automated, and workers stand by to monitor the machines. Many of the ingredients come from elsewhere — the ice cream mix and M&M cookies from regional suppliers, the peanuts from Mars’ roasting facility — and they all come together in the Burr Ridge factory.
    But it’s a delicate process, requiring precision to balance consistency, quality and the temperature demands of ice cream.
    For example, the Snickers Ice Cream Bars feature a layer of ice cream, the candy’s signature peanuts and caramel and a chocolate exterior. Inside the chilly factory, the chocolate has to stay warm enough to melt on top of the ice cream bar, which the conveyor belt then quickly moves through a freezing tunnel, so the ice cream doesn’t melt.
    From there, the Snickers Ice Cream Bars move past sensors that detect production mistakes, such as being too large or too small. The Snickers’ peanuts are often the culprit.
    The machine swiftly pushes the rejects aside, joining a crowd of fellow outcasts in melting slowly. The floors of the production line are dusted with the chocolate ashes of those that fell short of Mars’ standards. To keep the ice cream bars from melting, the conveyor belt has to move quickly, leaving no time to correct the misfits.
    But those that make the cut move down to be wrapped in Snickers’ packaging. Mechanical arms use small vacuums to pick up the Snickers bars without crushing them and place them into wrappers, which are then put into individual boxes and placed in cartons.
    New products also bring new manufacturing challenges. For example, Kind’s frozen bars are meant to taste the same with every bite taken, but the chunks of nuts presented difficulties meeting that level of consistency, according to Romain Lepicard, head of the Mars Ice Cream research and development team.
    The $50 million Mars spent already largely went toward upgrading the line dedicated to its ice cream bars, which can churn out several hundred thousand Snickers Ice Cream Bars per day. The investment also went toward some other tech upgrades, such as digital screens that will help the facility go paper free.
    Mars will spend the additional $20 million investment on further boosting how many ice cream bars the factory can make. The company plans to invest in equipment that will help it make more of the components for the Snickers Ice Cream Bars, such as caramel, plus other upgrades to capacity for the manufacturing line. More

  • in

    Legacy media companies enter dark times as failures mount and Netflix rises again

    Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, Paramount Global and Fox have all had major setbacks in 2023.
    The legacy media industry is in retrenchment mode as Hollywood writers strike and Netflix bounces back.
    Without a clear growth narrative, it’s hard to see how legacy media companies bounce back soon.

    Bob Iger, CEO of The Walt Disney Company, left; David Zaslav, CEO and president of Warner Bros. Discovery, center; and Bob Bakish, president and CEO of Paramount Global.
    Getty Images

    Companies and industries have ups and downs. The legacy media industry is in a valley.
    The first half of 2023 has been a colossal disappointment for media executives who wanted this year to be a rebound from a terrible 2022, when a slowdown in streaming subscribers cut valuations for Netflix, Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery and Paramount Global roughly in half.

    Instead, investors have once again become excited by Netflix’s future prospects as it’s cracked down on password sharing, potentially leading to tens of millions of new signups. Netflix shares have surged the past five months, outpacing the S&P 500.
    Meanwhile, the legacy players can’t get out of their own way.

    Stock chart icon

    Netflix vs the S&P 500 over the past five months.

    “When it rains it pours,” said LightShed media analyst Rich Greenfield. “It just keeps getting worse.”
    It’s been a bumpy ride for Disney Chief Executive Officer Bob Iger since he returned to lead the company late last year. Disney recently finished laying off 7,000 employees. Chief Financial Officer Christine McCarthy stepped down last week. The company is pulling programming from its streaming services to save money. Its animation business is in a major rut, with its latest Pixar movie, “Elemental,” recording the lowest opening weekend gross for the studio since the original “Toy Story” premiered in 1995. Shares have struggled in the past five months.

    Stock chart icon

    Disney vs. the S&P 500 over the past five months.

    Stock chart icon

    Warner Bros. Discovery vs. the S&P 500 over the past five months.

    Paramount Global cut its dividend last quarter as streaming losses peak this year and a weak advertising market exacerbates a terminally ill cable network business. Wells Fargo released an analyst note Friday saying the bull case and the bear case for the company were the same: selling for parts. Warren Buffett, perhaps the most acclaimed investor in history, told CNBC that Paramount’s streaming offering “fundamentally is not that good of a business.”

    Stock chart icon

    Paramount Global vs the S&P 500 over the past five months.

    Stock chart icon

    Fox Corp. vs the S&P 500 over the past five months.

    NBCUniversal has weathered the storm the best, shielded by its parent company, Comcast, which gets its revenue from cable and wireless assets. It’s also taken advantage of missteps from the aforementioned. MSNBC became the No. 1 cable news network this month for the first time in 120 weeks, dethroning Fox News amid coverage of former President Donald Trump’s federal indictment. Universal’s “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” is by far the biggest box office hit of the year, yet shares haven’t moved much.

    Stock chart icon

    Comcast vs the S&P 500 over the past five months.

    All of this is happening with an extended Hollywood writers’ strike going on in the background with no end in sight. The writers know the longer the strike lasts, the more pain will be inflicted on media companies, who will eventually run out of already-made scripted content. Zaslav recently gave a commencement address to Boston University and was drowned out by boos and chants of “pay your writers.”
    This week may bring even more bad news. Film and TV actors are set to join writers on strike unless they reach a deal with Hollywood studios by Friday.
    The beneficiary of Hollywood work shutdowns will likely be YouTube, TikTok, and Netflix, which continues to churn out international content that is unaffected by the strike, said Greenfield.
    Legacy media may get a small reprieve if advertising jumps back as the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign heats up. But there’s still scant evidence investors will reward media companies for simply cutting costs. There’s currently no strong growth narrative for legacy media, and consolidation prospects are murky as regulators block media-adjacent deals such as Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision and Penguin Random House’s proposed purchase of Simon & Schuster.
    The industry just wrapped up its annual advertising gala in Cannes, France. Legacy media executives still spent company dollars to make the trip to hang out on yachts and drink rosé. The backdrop was as beautiful as ever.
    But the landscape is bleak.
    Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, which is the parent company of CNBC.
    WATCH: WPP CEO Mark Read on the state of the advertising market, from Cannes Lions 2023 More

  • in

    Inside Sweetgreen’s first automated location — and the salad chain’s plans to take the tech nationwide

    Sweetgreen’s first automated Infinite Kitchen location, in Naperville, Illinois, has been operating since early May.
    CEO Jonathan Neman told investors weeks later that the salad chain expects all of its stores to be automated eventually.
    Sweetgreen hopes that the Infinite Kitchen will cut down on labor costs and improve the customer experience.

    In early May, Sweetgreen opened its first automated location, in the Chicago suburb of Naperville, Illinois. After only a few weeks operating the restaurant, the salad chain is preparing to go all in on the technology to cut labor costs and improve the customer experience.
    But in the early days of the automation trial, only time will tell if customers, employees and investors prefer the new way of making salads and warm bowls.

    The restaurant industry has historically been slow to adapt to new technology. Eateries’ razor-thin profit margins mean most don’t want to invest in expensive technology that might not work out for their kitchens or dining rooms.
    But with its so-called Infinite Kitchen, Sweetgreen joins the legion of restaurant companies incorporating automation into their businesses. Starbucks and Chipotle Mexican Grill are among the big names exploring artificial intelligence or robots. Some experiments, such as McDonald’s test of AI voice ordering for drive-thru lanes, haven’t resulted in nationwide launches.
    But it looks like Sweetgreen has more faith.
    “In five years, we do expect eventually all Sweetgreen stores to be automated,” CEO Jonathan Neman told investors at the William Blair Growth Stock Conference this month.
    Sweetgreen plans to open a second Infinite Kitchen location later this year. The company hasn’t disclosed the location but said it will retrofit an existing location with the technology.

    Why Sweetgreen chose automation

    Sweetgreen jumped into automation in August 2021. Just months before it went public, the salad chain purchased Spyce for roughly $50 million, although the final valuation depends on the performance of the startup’s technology, according to regulatory filings.
    Spyce was the brainchild of four MIT graduates, who founded the company in 2015. They created the robotic technology to make and serve healthy meals for an affordable price. The startup opened two restaurants in the Boston area before Sweetgreen bought it.
    A month after Sweetgreen acquired Spyce, and before it closed Spyce’s restaurants, the salad chain brought a few menu items to try out in one of Spyce’s locations.
    Sweetgreen then worked on how to make the robotic kitchen function for its restaurants.
    “The core foundations of the IK were the same. What we focused on is making it operationally easy to interact with as a team member — to stock, to clean, to maintain. There were also some tweaks to protect food quality,” Timothy Noonan, Sweetgreen’s vice president of operations strategy and concept design, told CNBC.
    The chain had to work out how to dispense goat cheese, which clumps easily, and cherry tomatoes, which could be easily squished. It also tweaked the technology to ensure consistent portions, whether for airy arugula or heavier toppings such as sunflower seeds. Sweetgreen also added the ability to rotate bowls as they move along the conveyor belt that fills dishes, ensuring even distribution of components, and the capacity to mix the ingredients together at the end.
    “We have an amazing team, but it’s really hard to keep it perfectly accurate and consistent,” Neman told CNBC. “And the other amazing thing is that the peaks don’t feel crazy. It’s not like some of our stores in New York. This allows us to be there, to serve more people, and this will have it feel a lot smoother.”
    After months testing the technology in the lab, Sweetgreen decided to try it out in Naperville, adding it to a new restaurant that was originally slated to be a traditional location.
    “We want to understand how suburban customers interact with this,” Noonan said.

    Inside the Infinite Kitchen

    The exterior of Sweetgreen’s Naperville location
    Source: Sweetgreen

    While Sweetgreen may tout labor savings to investors, the Naperville location was designed to put a face on the finished orders.
    The restaurant’s exterior features a large window that shows Sweetgreen workers preparing the ingredients that will make their way into the Infinite Kitchen’s dispensers and eventually into finished orders.
    “It starts with human hands, and we have people finishing off the bowls after they’re produced by the machine, so it ends with human hands,” Noonan said.

    The Naperville location displays Sweetgreen merch and drinks before customers place their orders at tablets.
    Source: Sweetgreen

    Upon entering the restaurant, customers pass by a display refrigerator of drinks and a rack of Sweetgreen-branded sweatshirts and t-shirts to order their food. A large digital menu board hangs above the display, flashing recommendations for new customers. 
    “We know that our menu for some customers can be a little overwhelming,” Noonan said.
    Customers can order from one of five tablets set up in the middle of the store. If none are available, diners can order on the app instead of waiting in line. Unlike the traditional Sweetgreen restaurant, customers won’t have to wait 10 to 15 minutes to pick up mobile orders.
    For now, an employee hangs around the tablets to help customers place their orders. Sweetgreen is still deciding how much of a human presence it needs during that step, Noonan said.

    Behind the ordering counter is the Infinite Kitchen, which assembles customers’ salads and warm bowls.
    Source: Sweetgreen

    Behind the counter is the “Infinite Kitchen,” which resembles the bulk food dispensers found in some grocery stores. The dispensers hold nearly all of the ingredients to assemble customers’ warm bowls and salads.
    After an order is placed, the Infinite Kitchen begins assembling the bowl, starting with dressing on the bottom. Then come the greens and the grains, followed by the rest of the selected toppings. At each stop, the bowls rotate slightly, allowing the new ingredients to go in an empty spot. The bowls glide past dispensers for ingredients they don’t need, unless a dish in front blocks their path.
    The final automated step is mixing the salads or bowls. A worker waits at the end of the assembly line to add herbs, avocado and fish — all of which the Infinite Kitchen can’t add yet.
    “There’s still a couple of things we have to do by hand, but we believe that the focus will allow us better accuracy,” Noonan said. “We still wanted someone to check the orders.”
    The conveyor belt can hold up to 20 bowls, with room to add more if needed, and can make up to 600 bowls an hour if none need to be mixed, according to Noonan.
    Even behind the scenes, the setup is deceptively simple. Stairs behind the end of the assembly line lead to a mezzanine level where the dispensers can be reloaded. Screens show if any ingredients are running low or signal any possible malfunctions, such as an overfilled dispenser.
    If any dispensers stop working, the ingredients can be moved down to a different spot or added by hand at the end of the process. But overall, workers are relatively hands off in the Infinite Kitchen.

    Fruits of automation’s labor

    Wall Street primarily cares about automation’s ability to cut labor costs, though Sweetgreen and other restaurant chains deny it is their only motivation to explore the technology.
    T.D. Cowen estimated last year that about 30% of Sweetgreen’s costs are labor, with half of its staff preparing food and the other half assembling orders. Cutting down on labor means increasing profit margins. Sweetgreen is already profitable at the restaurant level, although the company overall has yet to turn a profit.
    It’s clear already that the Infinite Kitchen means fewer Sweetgreen workers in restaurants. Noonan said locations with the Infinite Kitchen can rely on roughly half the workers of a traditional location. They don’t need to beef up how many workers are scheduled for five-hour shifts to deal with the overwhelming peak periods — which only last about 90 minutes.
    “Part of the beauty of this is being able to keep the same size team and let the machine absorb the peak,” Noonan said.
    Employees have to set up the Infinite Kitchen in the morning, ensuring it’s well-stocked and calibrated for accurate and consistent portions. Throughout the day, workers will watch digital screens that will tell them if any dispensers are running low on ingredients or experiencing any issues. At the end of the day, employees will have to clean the system.
    Sweetgreen anticipates some secondary labor benefits, as well. Workers at the Naperville location didn’t need extra training, and down the line, training for Infinite Kitchen locations should be faster.
    “A big part of training in a typical restaurant involves not just training the prep processes, but figuring out how to memorize our core menu items,” Noonan said.
    Neman also said that the calmer restaurant environment might mean employees stick around longer, reducing turnover, a common problem in the restaurant industry.

    Customer reactions

    So far, customers have barely noticed the automation, according to Noonan. He said they often think that the ordering tablets are the automated tools and mistake the Infinite Kitchen for a fridge displaying ingredients.
    But it doesn’t seem like the location’s use of automation will alienate many customers. Broadly, consumers are growing more comfortable with technology in restaurants. A Deloitte survey conducted in March found that 60% of respondents reported being somewhat likely to order from a kitchen that prepares food at least partially using robotic technologies. That’s up from 54% in the consulting firm’s survey two years ago.
    Buzz about the Naperville restaurant’s use of automation seems to be generating interest, although it’s too soon to tell if the crowds will still be there in a few months. Rich Shank, vice president of research and insights for Chicago-based Technomic, told CNBC that his coworkers have reported long lines during busy lunch and dinner hours. Shank is waiting for consumers’ curiosity to die down before he visits.
    The changes to in-person ordering may contribute to the long lines. A traditional Sweetgreen location allows customers to make up their minds about their customized meals as they move along the assembly line, telling employees what ingredients they want. This approach usually leads to lines during busy times — but they tend to move relatively quickly.
    But at Naperville, customers don’t have the same chance to look at a display of ingredients. The tablets’ format will be familiar to anyone used to Sweetgreen’s website and mobile app, but it can create a bottleneck for customers who aren’t as certain about their orders.
    One Yelp reviewer said the line to order went out the door, just because it took customers several minutes to order.
    “That may be the downfall of this establishment because had we walked in 5 minutes later and seen that line we would have walked past and eaten someplace else,” the customer wrote in the review.
    It’s a common issue for fast-casual restaurants that have built their menus around customization, according to Shank.
    “The verdict is out on whether the user interface of any sort of kiosk can solve that problem,” Shank said.
    On a more basic level, customers could also realize that they want a human to assemble their orders.
    “It is faster for a human to hear the customization that the customer requires and to make adjustments on the fly. The machine, at least in its present form, doesn’t sound like it’s able to handle the improvisation that often happens on the line, like ‘I don’t want that much sauce’ or ‘Can you make it extra light on the dressing?'” Shank said.
    And, of course, there’s always the potential for the Infinite Kitchen’s technology to fail, despite Sweetgreen’s best efforts to eliminate errors that would take down the system. The layout of the Naperville location wasn’t created with back-up make lines that would allow employees to assemble orders by hand quickly. More