More stories

  • in

    Philip Esformes, whose prison sentence Trump commuted, loses appeal and faces retrial on health-care fraud charges

    A Florida nursing home owner whose 20-year prison sentence for a $1.3 billion Medicare fraud scheme was commuted by then-President Donald Trump in late 2020 has lost a federal court appeal.
    Philip Esformes now appears headed for retrial on six health-care fraud charges that a jury previously deadlocked on.
    Esformes had appealed his convictions for fraud, money laundering, and receiving illegal kickbacks, claiming the indictment against him should be dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct.

    Philanthropist Philip Esformes attends the 15th annual Harold & Carole Pump Foundation gala at the Hyatt Regency Century Plaza on August 7, 2015 in Century City, California.
    Tiffany Rose | Getty Images

    A Florida nursing home owner whose 20-year prison sentence for a $1.3 billion Medicare fraud scheme was commuted by then-President Donald Trump in late 2020 has lost a federal court appeal and now appears headed for retrial on six health-care criminal charges that a jury previously deadlocked on.
    Philip Esformes had appealed his convictions for fraud, money laundering, and receiving illegal kickbacks, claiming the indictment against him should be dismissed because of prosecutorial misconduct, and on other grounds.

    When charges were filed against him and two others in 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice called it the “largest single criminal health-care fraud case ever brought against individuals” in department history.
    A three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit unanimously rejected Esformes’ appeal in a ruling earlier this month.
    The decision leaves him on the hook for $44 million in fines and forfeiture orders related to his conviction.
    Esformes’ lawyers have indicated they plan to request a rehearing of their appeal by the entire line-up of the judges on the 11th Circuit.
    But such requests almost always face long odds against success.

    The same panel also said it did not have jurisdiction to address Esformes’ argument that Trump’s grant of clemency, which freed him from prison, bars prosecutors from re-trying him on at least one count of the six charges that jurors failed to reach a verdict on at his trial.
    Esformes’ lawyers had argued that a new trial on that would violate Trump’s clemency action, as well as the double jeopardy clause.
    The appeals panel said in its ruling, “We cannot reach the merits of this argument because the hung counts were not the basis of a final judgment.”
    “With limited exceptions not relevant here, we review only final judgments,” the panel wrote.
    There is no federal statute that explicitly states that prosecutors cannot retry a defendant on charges a jury deadlocked on after a president commuted their sentence for other counts on which they were convicted. Nor is there federal case law that addresses that question.
    If Esformes is convicted at a retrial in federal court in Southern Florida, it is likely that his lawyers will relaunch their argument on appeal that retrial was barred by Trump’s clemency.
    Esformes’ lawyer Kim Watterson, in a statement to CNBC, said: “The Court of Appeals did not decide the question of whether President Trump’s grant of clemency to Philip Esformes bars further prosecution on any counts.”

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    “Rather, the Court held that – as an appellate court – it lacked the necessary jurisdiction to decide the clemency argument at this point in time, expressly stating that it was not reaching the merits of the argument,” Watterson said.
    Esformes’ effort to have his case dismissed had backing from a group of Republican former U.S. Attorneys General, among them Edmund Meese, John Ashcroft, Michael Mukasey and Alberto Gonzalez, as well as Louis Freeh, a former FBI director and federal judge.
    That group said prosecutors in Esformes’ case had violated rules that barred them from using communications between defendants and their lawyers.
    In its ruling, the appeals court panel noted that prosecutors “not only reviewed privileged documentsbut also tried to use them against Esformes before trial on two occasions.”
    And the panel also said that a lower-court judge had found the prosecutors engaged in misconduct, as well as a “bad-faith” effort to obfuscate that conduct.
    But the appeals panel noted that that judge, and a federal district court judge “rejected Esformes’s request to dismiss the indictment or to disqualify members of the prosecution team.”
    The panel said that it agreed with prosecutors’ arguments on appeal that Esformes had “failed to prove ‘demonstrable prejudice’ from the intrusions on his privilege” of privacy in communications with lawyers.
    “So dismissal of the indictment or disqualification of the prosecution team would have been improper,” the panel ruled.
    Esformes, who had been in prison at the time, was one of the dozens of people to receive executive clemency from Trump in his last months of office.
    The Justice Department has said Esformes’ fraud scheme spanned two decades and involved an estimated $1.3 billion in losses as the result of fraudulent claims to Medicare and Medicaid.
    With the proceeds of that scheme, Esformes bought a $1.6 million Ferrari Apera automobile, a $360,000 Greubel Forsey watch, and also paid for female escorts, the indictment said.
    Prosecutors also have said Esformes paid out $300,000 in bribes to Jerome Allen, who at the time was the University of Pennsylvania’s men’s basketball coach, who helped get Esformes’ son admitted to the university’s prestigious Wharton School of Business by falsely claiming he was a prized basketball recruit.
    When Esformes was convicted in 2019 at his trial of 20 criminal counts he faced, an FBI agent in charge of Miami’s field office said he “is a man driven by almost unbounded greed.”
    “Esformes cycled patients through his facilities in poor condition where they received inadequate or unnecessary treatment, then improperly billed Medicare and Medicaid,” the agent said.
    “Taking his despicable conduct further, he bribed doctors and regulators to advance his criminal conduct,” the agent said.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Bed Bath & Beyond beefs up legal team ahead of possible bankruptcy filing in New Jersey

    Bed Bath & Beyond has hired another legal advisor as it preps for a potential bankruptcy filing in New Jersey in the coming weeks, according to people familiar with the matter.
    The retailer has been shouldering a heavy debt burden as it faces declining sales and widening losses.
    The company has been running a sale process in hopes of finding a buyer, as well as looking for financing that would keep it afloat during a bankruptcy filing, CNBC previously reported.

    A “Store Closing” banner on a Bed Bath & Beyond store in Farmingdale, New York, on Friday, Jan. 6, 2023.
    Johnny Milano | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Bed Bath & Beyond is bulking up its team of legal advisors as the troubled retailer preps a potential bankruptcy filing that would take place in New Jersey in the coming weeks, according to people familiar with the matter.
    The company has hired law firm Cole Schotz to assist in a potential filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the District of New Jersey, according to the people who weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter. The situation remains fluid, however, and plans may change, the people added.

    related investing news

    Bed Bath has been in discussions to nail down financing that would keep it afloat if it were to file for bankruptcy, CNBC previously reported. The company also is in the midst of a sale process in hopes of keeping its namesake chain and Buybuy Baby business alive.
    Still, the Union, New Jersey-based retailer has been moving toward a bankruptcy filing in its home state, an increasingly popular venue for Chapter 11 cases, the people said.
    Earlier this week, fellow retailer Party City filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection with plans to restructure its balance sheet and move forward with a smaller footprint of stores. That filing was made in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas.
    A Bed Bath spokeswoman said the company doesn’t comment on speculation or specific relationships, saying only that it has been working with advisors to regain market share and explore multiple paths.
    “We have a team, internally and externally, with proven experience helping companies successfully navigate complex situations and become stronger,” the spokeswoman said in a statement.

    A representative for Cole Schotz didn’t respond to requests for comment.
    The retailer has been working with other advisors, including Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm well known for representing bankrupt companies, as it navigates its financial troubles. Kirkland & Ellis and Cole Schotz also serve as legal advisors to crypto lender BlockFi, which filed for Chapter 11 protection in the New Jersey bankruptcy court.
    Bed Bath also recently hired consulting firm AlixPartners as one of its advisors, replacing Berkeley Research Group, CNBC previously reported.
    Despite efforts to stave off landing in bankruptcy protection, a filing will likely occur in the weeks ahead, the people said.
    Earlier this month, Bed Bath warned of a looming bankruptcy as its turnaround plans failed to improve the business and its balance sheet deteriorated. The retailer is facing a hefty debt load, falling sales and widening losses.
    On Thursday, Bed Bath said it received a notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market that it was out of compliance after not filing its quarterly earnings statement on time. The company said it is working to finalize its report and file it to regain compliance within 60 days.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Trump drops lawsuit against New York AG after judge in case sanctions him almost $1 million for Clinton suit

    Former President Donald Trump voluntarily dropped a longshot federal lawsuit in Florida against New York Attorney General Letitia James.
    The move came a day after the same judge in the case sanctioned him and his lawyer nearly $1 million for filing another, “frivolous” lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and many other defendants.
    James is suing Trump in New York state court over allegedly fraudulent financial statements related to his company, the Trump Organization.

    Former President Donald Trump stands on the 18th green during the Pro-Am tournament before the LIV Golf series at Trump National Doral, Oct. 27, 2022.
    Jasen Vinlove | USA Today Sports | Reuters

    Former President Donald Trump on Friday morning voluntarily dropped a longshot federal lawsuit in Florida against New York’s attorney general — a day after the same judge in the case sanctioned him and his lawyer nearly $1 million for filing another, “frivolous” lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and many other defendants.
    The judge, John Middlebrooks, had pointedly noted in a scathing sanction order Thursday evening in the Clinton case that he was also handling Trump’s complaint against Attorney General Letitia James in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

    Trump’s suit against James — which Middlebrooks last month warned appeared “vexatious and frivolous” — was filed in reaction to her office’s civil lawsuit against Trump in New York state court alleging fraud at his company.
    James’ spokeswoman, Delaney Kempner, noted that Trump’s dismissal of his lawsuit came on the same day that his “reply to our motion to dismiss this case was due.” It also came two days after Middlebrooks scheduled a jury trial of the suit to start in mid-July.
    A lawyer for Trump did not immediately respond to a question about why the lawsuit against James was voluntarily dismissed.
    In the Clinton case, Middlebrooks ordered Trump, who is seeking the 2024 GOP presidential nomination, and his lawyer Alina Habba to pay Clinton and other defendants around $938,000 for filing the suit, which the judge previously dismissed.
    Trump’s suit accused Clinton and the others, including the Democratic National Committee and various FBI officials, of conspiring to create a false narrative during the 2016 presidential election that his campaign was colluding with Russia.

    “We are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” Middlebrooks wrote in his order dunning Trump and Habba with monetary sanctions.

    New York Attorney General Letitia James pauses during a press conference at the Office of the Attorney General in New York on May 9, 2022, to make an announcement about protecting access to abortion.
    Timothy A. Clary | AFP | Getty Images

    Middlebrooks’ order cited how Trump has responded in court in New York to James’ yearslong civil investigation of his company, the Trump Organization, as one of the multiple examples of “a pattern of abuse of the courts” by the Republican former president.
    “Mr. Trump is a prolific and sophisticated litigant who is repeatedly using the courts to seek revenge on political adversaries,” the judge wrote.
    “He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process, and he cannot be seen as a litigant blindly following the advice of a lawyer.”
    James in September filed suit in Manhattan Supreme Court against Trump, his company, three of his adult children, and others, alleging widespread fraud involving false financial statements related to the company’s business.
    In November, Trump sued James in Florida state court, alleging she was engaged in a “war of intimidation and harassment” against him. That suit sought to block James from getting records from a revocable trust he set up in Florida that has ownership of the Trump Organization.
    James shortly thereafter removed that lawsuit to federal court in Florida, where Middlebrooks was assigned the case.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    Middlebrooks in his order in the Clinton case Thursday noted that last month he had ruled that Trump’s “attempt to sidestep rulings by the New York court by suing AG James individually rather than in her official capacity was plainly frivolous.”
    The judge also had found that Trump had “no likelihood of success on the merits” of the case, and that he had urged Trump to consider dropping his opposition to James’ bid to get the case.
    “This litigation [against James] has all the telltale signs of being both vexatious and frivolous,” Middlebrooks had written last month.
    But the judge later wrote, “a decision in Mr. Trump’s Florida lawsuit against the New York Attorney General, a case now pending before me, is premature.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    GM to invest $918 million in new V-8 gas engines and EV components

    General Motors plans to invest nearly $1 billion in four U.S. plants to support production of components for electric vehicles and its next generation of V-8 engines.
    It’s a signal that the company will keep relying on gas-powered vehicles for the foreseeable future.
    GM has said it plans to offer an exclusively electric-powered lineup by 2035.

    Line workers work on the chassis of full-size General Motors pickup trucks at the Flint Assembly plant on June 12, 2019 in Flint, Michigan.
    JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP / Getty Images

    FLINT, Mich. — General Motors plans to invest nearly $1 billion in four U.S. plants to support production of components for electric vehicles as well as its next generation of V-8 engines, signaling gas-powered trucks and performance cars are here for the foreseeable future.
    The $918 million investment, which GM announced Friday, is despite the automaker’s plans to exclusively offer all-electric consumer vehicles by 2035. It’s the latest example of legacy automakers such as GM having to balance their current lineup of vehicles with emerging EVs.

    “Our commitment is to an all-EV future, no doubt about it,” Gerald Johnson, global head of GM’s manufacturing, told reporters after the announcement. “We know that has a horizon and between here and there, there are a lot of internal combustion engine customers that we don’t want to lose.”
    A majority of the investment — $579 million — will go toward preparing GM’s Flint Engine Operations plant in Michigan for the automaker’s sixth-generation family of small-block V-8 gas engines.
    The engines are used in some of the automaker’s most highly profitable products, such as its full-size pickup trucks and SUVs. They’ve also been used in some Cadillac and Chevrolet performance cars.
    GM said work at the Flint facility will begin immediately, signaling the next-generation V-8 engines are on the horizon. The automaker declined to elaborate on timing, performance and other details of the engines. The last new family of V-8 engines came about in 2013.
    The remaining investments will occur at other parts operations in Michigan, Ohio and New York for gas-powered parts such as camshafts and manifolds as well as castings to support future EVs, according to GM.

    Like the company, leaders with the United Auto Workers union echoed the need for investments in both traditional operations and EVs.
    “Is electric going to come tomorrow? Is it 10 years away? You still need the internal combustion until the the technology is perfected for the EVs,” newly elected UAW Vice President Mike Booth, told CNBC.
    UAW President Ray Curry, who is in a runoff election to keep his position, said the union welcomes investment in both areas as the industry and its workers transition.
    “We want to have the opportunity to make sure existing operations are shored up and that new operations that come online have the capital investment to move forward,” he said.
    The union, which is scheduled to bargain with GM later this year, wants emerging EV work to be classified the same as their traditional engine and powertrain jobs. The company, in contrast, has expressed a need for much of the work to be in a lower pay bracket in order to be competitive.
    Booth, who leads the UAW’s GM unit, called Friday’s investment a “big deal” but said it has no impact on the upcoming negotiations.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Fanatics is in talks to acquire BetParx sportsbook

    Fanatics is in discussions to buy the BetParx sportsbook, sources said.
    Fanatics, which has a valuation of $31 billion, has been exploring acquisitions of sportsbooks as it moves further into the sports betting business.
    Fanatics has signed a letter of intent for the sportsbook, but a deal is not certain and the talks may not result in a sale, the sources said.

    New York, NY. – December 7th. Portrait for a profile on Fanatics founder & CEO Michael Rubin at his office in downtown NYC.
    The Washington Post | Getty Images

    Fanatics is in discussions to acquire the BetParx sportsbook, as the sports merchandising company looks to take a bigger position in sports betting, according to people familiar with the matter.
    A deal hasn’t been reached, although Fanatics signed a letter of intent to buy the sportsbook, said the people, who weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter. A deal price couldn’t yet be learned, and the discussions may not result in an agreement, the people added.

    Representatives for Fanatics and BetParx declined to comment.
    The BetParx app was launched last year by Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, the parent company of Parx Casino in Pennsylvania, and Playtech, an online gambling software supplier. BetParx is also available in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Michigan and Ohio.
    Fanatics has considered an initial public offering, but has been looking to complete an acquisition in the gambling space, among other possible deals, ahead of going public, the people said.
    The company would be entering a crowded marketplace. Dozens of sports-betting operators have emerged in recent years, including Flutter-owned FanDuel, DraftKings, Caesars and BetMGM, which is co-owned by MGM Resorts and Entain. As the space has grown more competitive, smaller players have struggled, with some, like MaximBet, ceasing operations recently.
    Fanatics has been seeking a deal in the sports betting space for some time. Last year, it had been in discussions with small gambling operator Tipico, CNBC previously reported.

    The company is opening Fanatics Sportsbook at FedExField, the stadium of the NFL’s Washington Commanders. Fanatics also said it received a temporary license to operate in Massachusetts, and plans to partner with Plainridge Park Casino, which is owned by Penn National.
    In October, Fanatics said it hired Andrea Ellis as chief financial officer of its betting and gaming division.
    Last year, Fanatics’ billionaire executive chairman Michael Rubin sold his 10% stake in Harris Blitzer Sports Entertainment, the owner of the Philadelphia 76ers and New Jersey Devils, allowing Fanatics to enter the gambling space. NBA rules prohibit team owners from operating a gambling platform.
    Fanatics raised $700 million in capital late last year, which the company planned to use toward potential mergers and acquisitions across the collectibles, betting and gaming businesses, CNBC previously reported.
    The fresh round of capital brought Fanatics’ valuation to $31 billion.
    Rubin’s company has been rapidly growing recently, pushing past solely being an online sports merchandise business. The company estimates its revenue for Fanatics, including its Lids segment, will be approximately $8 billion in 2023.
    The company has been growing through acquisitions. Last year, it expanded its footprint in the collectibles business with a $500 million acquisition of Topps. It also bought clothing brand Mitchell & Ness in partnership with LeBron James and Kevin Durant.
    –CNBC’s Jessica Golden contributed to this article.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Existing home sales fell for the 11th consecutive month in December, hitting the slowest pace since November 2010

    Homes sales ended the year at a seasonally adjusted, annualized pace of 4.02 million units, which was 34% lower than December 2021.
    It is the slowest pace since November 2010, when the nation was struggling through a housing crisis.
    Home sales have now fallen for 11 straight months, due to much higher mortgage rates.

    Homes in Rocklin, California, US, on Tuesday, Dec. 6, 2022. A record number of homes are being delisted as sellers face a sharp drop in demand, according to real estate brokerage Redfin.
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Sales of previously owned homes dropped 1.5% in December from the previous month, according to the National Association of Realtors.
    Sales ended the year at a seasonally adjusted, annualized pace of 4.02 million units, which was 34% lower than December 2021. It is the slowest pace since November 2010, when the nation was struggling through a housing crisis brought on by faulty subprime mortgages.

    Total sales for the year were down 17.8% from 2021.
    Home sales have now fallen for 11 straight months, due to much higher mortgage rates, which began rising last spring and had more than doubled by fall. Sky-high prices, driven by high demand during the first years of the pandemic, weakened affordability even further and caused supply to fall sharply.
    “December was another difficult month for buyers, who continue to face limited inventory and high mortgage rates,” said Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the Realtors. “However, expect sales to pick up again soon since mortgage rates have markedly declined after peaking late last year.”
    Mortgage rates have fallen a full percentage point since their high last October, but they are still roughly double what they were one year ago.
    At the end of December, total housing inventory fell 13.4% from November to 970,000 units. It was, however, up 10.2% from the previous December. Unsold inventory is at a 2.9-month supply at the current sales pace, down from 3.3 months in November but up from 1.7 months in December 2021.

    Low supply continues to support prices to some extent, but the gains are shrinking compared with a year ago. The median price of an existing home sold in December was $366,900, up 2.3% from the year before. It is still the highest price recorded for December, but annual price gains had been in the double digits last summer.
    “Markets in roughly half of the country are likely to offer potential buyers discounted prices compared to last year,” added Yun.
    The trouble, however, is that sellers are not entering the market, given falling prices and weaker demand. The total inventory is higher than a year ago because homes are sitting on the market longer. New listings in January are down year over year.
    “Evaporating demand has ended the strong sellers market of the past several years, and still-falling home sales tell us that many buyers are still not able to afford a purchase or not yet convinced that the market is tilted sufficiently in their favor to move forward. The housing market is entering “nobody’s market” territory as buyers and sellers remain largely in a stalemate,” said Danielle Hale, chief economist for Realtor.com.
    First-time buyers continue to struggle in today’s market, making up just 31% of December sales. While this is up from 30% in December of last year, it is far off the historical norm of 40%.
    The market continues to slow, with homes sitting on the market an average 26 days, up from 24 days in November and 19 days in December 2021.
    All-cash sales rose to 28% of transactions from 23% the year before and investors made up 16% of sales, slightly down from 17% the year before.
    While sales are down in all price categories, they are falling most sharply on the higher end. Sales of homes priced above $1 million were down 45% year over year, compared with sales of homes priced between $250,000 and $500,000, which were down 34%. Yun suggested that weakness on the higher end may be due to volatility in the stock market.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    How robots are helping address the fast-food labor shortage

    Struggling to find workers and eager to relieve staff from boring, repetitive tasks, fast-food restaurant chains are adding robots to their kitchens.
    Using artificial intelligence, computer vision technology and a mechanical arm, Miso Robotics’ Flippy 2 has been deployed to Chipotle, White Castle and Wing Zone. White Castle said it plans to add 100 Flippy robots to work the fry station at its restaurants nationwide. 

    “The tide has turned, this is no longer a question of are robotics coming to the industry,” said Jake Brewer, chief strategy officer at Miso Robotics. “It’s a foregone conclusion. The question is at what pace and in what form.”
    Up to 82% of restaurant positions could, to some extent, be replaced by robots, according to a forecast by restaurant consultancy Aaron Allen & Associates. Automation could save U.S. fast-food restaurants more than $12 billion in annual wages, the group said.
    Other companies in the space include Picnic, whose pizza station can make up to 130 oven-ready pizzas per hour, and Autec, with a line of sushi robots.
    So what impact will robots have on the fast-food industry and the livelihood of its workers? CNBC got a behind-the-scenes look at restaurant robot maker Miso Robotics to find out.
    Watch the video to learn more.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Byju’s plans to end sponsorship of Indian cricket team jersey, as it puts profitability on cards for 2024

    Indian education technology start-up Byju’s will not renew its jersey sponsorship deal with India’s cricket team, the company’s co-founder Divya Gokulnath, told CNBC.
    Gokulnath said Byju’s is targeting profitability by March 2024.
    The company is also aiming for an initial public offering (IPO) when market conditions improve, Gokulnath said.

    Indian education technology start-up Byju’s will not renew its jersey sponsorship deal with India’s cricket team, the company’s co-founder Divya Gokulnath, told CNBC.
    In a wide-ranging interview, Gokulnath spoke about the path to profitability and the potential for an initial public offering for Byju’s, one of India’s most valuable private technology firms.

    The Bangalore-based Byju’s delivers online classes to students in various subjects. It has 150 million students across the world, of whom 25% outside of India.

    Star Indian batsman Virat Kohli in picture. Indian education start-up Byju’s has its logo prominently displayed on the Indian cricket team’s jerseys.
    Munir Uz Zaman | AFP | Getty Images

    The company’s losses boomed in its financial year that ended in March 2021, its latest public figures showed. Gokulnath attributes this to a change in revenue recognition. Instead of revenue being accounted for when a person paid for a course, it is instead calculated when the specific course begins.
    Gokulnath said that the company is seeing improvements over the last 12 months.
    “We are doing really well … the last 12 months have been really good for us in terms of the number of products that we’ve added, in terms of the different formats that we’ve launched and in terms of the geography and the subjects that we’ve scaled into,” Gokulnath said.
    The co-founder added that the company will “hopefully” become profitable by the end of its financial year, which concludes in March 2024.

    This will involve cutting down on branding and marketing expenses. Byju’s was an official sponsor of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar last year. The company also has a sponsorship deal with the Board of Control for Cricket in India, the governing body for the sport in the country. Cricket is the biggest sport in India, a country with a population of more than 1.4 billion people.
    Byju’s logo currently appears on the Indian cricket team’s jersey. But Gokulnath told CNBC Byju’s will not renew the deal after its March expiry.

    IPO ahead

    Byju’s reportedly has a valuation of $22 billion. Gokulnath says that the company was looking to go public last year, but that market conditions deteriorated.
    Tech stocks globally got hammered, as the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks rapidly raised interest rates to fight rampant inflation.
    An IPO is still on the cards when the market improves, Gokulnath said.
    “Even early last year, we did think of multiple options to go public. But the thing is, we do have the luxury to decide when and where and how we want to do this,” Gokulnath said.
    “We want to do this at a time when we don’t have to give up on the potential the company has. Because a lot of internal processes are in our control but not the external environment, and we want both to be doing really well before we go the IPO way.” More