More stories

  • in

    Veteran banker Jeffrey Schmid picked to lead Kansas City Fed

    Schmid has held positions at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Mutual of Omaha Bank, which he helped establish.
    Schmid will serve the remainder of George’s five-year term helming the Kansas City Fed.

    Jeffrey Schmid, the new president and CEO of the Kansas City Fed.
    Courtesy: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

    The Kansas City Federal Reserve is about to get a new leader as the inflation-fighting central bank plots its course ahead.
    Jeffrey R. Schmid, with more than 40 years of experience as a regulator and banker, will take over Aug. 21 for Esther George, who retired earlier this year.

    related investing news

    2 days ago

    3 days ago

    Most recently, Schmid has served as president and CEO of Southern Methodist University’s Cox School of Business, where he worked after holding positions at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Mutual of Omaha Bank, which he helped establish.
    “Jeff’s perspective as a native Nebraskan, his broad experience in banking and his deep roots in our region will be an incredible asset to the Federal Reserve, both as a leader of the organization and in his role as a monetary policymaker,” said Maria Griego-Raby, president and principal of Contract Associates in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As deputy chair of the bank’s board of directors, she led the search for George’s successor.
    The appointment comes after the Fed approved a series of 11 interest rate increases aimed at bringing down inflation that had been running at a 40-year high. George was long thought to be one of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee’s more hawkish members in favoring tighter monetary policy.
    Schmid will serve the remainder of George’s five-year term helming the Kansas City Fed, which will take him to Feb. 28, 2026.
    Interestingly, he arrives at the Fed just before the Kansas City district hosts its annual Jackson Hole summit, which this year will run from Aug. 24-26. The retreat features a keynote address from the Fed chair and often is pivotal in laying out policy strategy. More

  • in

    Elon Musk tweets and Twitter bots drove up price of FTX-listed altcoins, research finds

    Rampant bot activity on Twitter helped pump the price of FTX-listed and Alameda Research-traded cryptocurrency, a new study found.
    Researchers at the Network Contagion Research Institute also found that bot activity and price action significantly increased after X Corp. CTO Elon Musk shared Tweets about two altcoins.
    Bankman-Fried and his executives were acutely aware of the influence that Twitter had on the crypto markets.

    Sam Bankman-Fried, co-founder and chief executive officer of FTX, in Hong Kong, China, on Tuesday, May 11, 2021.
    Lam Yik | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Rampant bots on Twitter helped to pump up the price of cryptocurrency, including coins traded by insiders at FTX hedge fund Alameda Research before its collapse, according to a new study from the Network Contagion Research Institute published Wednesday.
    NCRI researchers conducted a scaled analysis on Twitter (now known as X) examining over 3 million tweets from Jan. 1, 2019, to Jan. 27, 2023, pertaining to 18 different cryptocurrencies in partnership with New Jersey GovSTEM Scholars. They also shared their findings with X Corp. days ahead of publication.

    Mentions of certain altcoins by Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who led an acquisition of Twitter that closed last October, appear to have caused prices to spike by as much as 50% within one day, the researchers found.
    The NCRI study pointed to Musk’s June 24, 2023, retweet of a post featuring a kitten and the caption, “I wake up there is another PSYOP,” a coin created by a pseudonymous Twitter influencer known as Ben.eth. Trading of this altcoin nearly doubled in volume over the next day, according to CoinMarketCap data.
    Separately, a Musk tweet on May 13, 2023, featuring Pepe the Frog memes led to a more than 50% increase in the price of altcoin PEPE within 24 hours. Musk’s tweet fueled both authentic discussion and bot and promotional tweets about the altcoin, which is based on a popular far-right meme.
    The NCRI findings raise significant questions about social media driven market manipulation in the broader crypto markets. The study also highlights the considerable challenge Musk faces in reigning in bot activity that was pervasive on the social media platform for years and still persists there.
    Musk has claimed, without providing data, that bot activity has fallen since he acquired Twitter.

    According to Alex Goldenberg, Lead Intelligence Analyst for NCRI, “Since Musk’s team took over Twitter last year, API changes were made to deter bot creation, possibly reducing crypto promotion and scams. However, these changes come with trade-offs as they also hinder independent audits by third-party researchers.”
    Goldenberg recommends that if bot activity remains high, X Corp. could “consider stricter account verification, machine learning for bot detection, and special permissions for certified researchers to ensure transparency while combating malicious bot activity and other forms of online harm.”
    X Corp. has been increasing the price to access data for researchers, while also filing lawsuits and threats against researchers looking into hate speech and other online harms on its platform. In recent weeks, X Corp. sued Bright Data and the Center for Countering Digital Hate, for example, raising the ire of House Democrats. NCRI partners with Bright Data for pro-bono access to social media data, Goldenberg noted.
    X Corp. did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    FTX benefitted greatly from Twitter bot activity

    The NCRI study also highlights how inauthentic activity on Twitter helped drive up the price of tokens listed on FTX in the months before the crypto exchange collapsed. “Bot-like accounts were used to manipulate market sentiment and drive up the price of FTX-listed tokens,” Goldenberg told CNBC in an interview.
    Six small-cap tokens listed by FTX were significantly influenced by inauthentic social media activity on Twitter, NCRI found. The researchers said that “inauthentic chatter” was “successfully and deliberately deployed to influence changes in FTX coin prices,” for six tokens: BOBA, GALA, IMX, RNDR, and SPELL.
    Alameda held at least five of these tokens before they were listed on FTX, and as bot-like activity on Twitter amplified the visibility of the tokens. For one crypto asset, RNDR, inauthentic posts and activity on Twitter concurred with or preceded double-digit percentage jumps in its price.
    On four separate dates from 2022 to 2023, spikes in bot activity on Twitter preceded increases in RNDR’s price ranging from 11% to 30% within a single day, the NCRI analysis found.
    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and his team were well aware of Twitter’s influence on the crypto markets, and how sophisticated investors could extract value from social-media driven price action.
    “People on crypto Twitter, or other sort of similar parties, go and put $200 million in the box collectively,” Bankman-Fried said in an 2022 interview on Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast. “In the world we’re in, if you do this, everyone’s gonna be like, ‘Ooh, box token. Maybe it’s cool. If you buy in box token,’ you know, that’s gonna appear on Twitter and it’ll have a $20 million market cap.”
    FTX was one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world before it filed for bankruptcy in 2022.
    Bankman-Fried, 31, now faces a federal indictment for allegedly committing securities and wire fraud. He’s also the subject of Securities and Exchange Commission charges, which alleges that he built his empire on a “foundation of deception.”
    Representatives for Bankman-Fried declined to comment. The SEC and FTX did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
    Read the full NCRI study here. More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: Match Group, CVS, SolarEdge and more

    The Match.com website is shown on an Apple iPhone.
    Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making headlines before the bell on Wednesday.
    CVS Health — Shares of the retail pharmacy giant rose 1.8% premarket after the company posted strong earnings and revenue for the second quarter. CVS reported earnings of $2.21 per share on revenue of $88.9 billion. Wall Street analysts expected $2.11 per share on earnings of $86.5 billion, according to Refinitiv.

    related investing news

    2 days ago

    Kraft Heinz — The food and beverage stock dipped 1% before the bell after reporting mixed quarterly results that fell short of Wall Street’s revenue expectations. Kraft Heinz posted adjusted earnings of 79 cents a share, excluding items, on revenues of $6.72 billion.
    Norwegian Cruise Line — The stock fell 3.2% in premarket trading after the company posted its earnings results on Tuesday, which indicated weaker-than-expected guidance for the third quarter. The cruise ship operator topped Wall Street’s estimates, however. On Wednesday, Susquehanna downgraded its rating on Norwegian shares to neutral from positive. It maintained its price target of $17, which suggests a 12.4% downside from Tuesday’s close. 
    SolarEdge Technologies — The solar stock fell 13.4% after the company missed revenue expectations in its second quarter, reporting $991 million compared to the expected $992 million from analysts polled by Refinitiv. The company beat earnings estimates, however, coming out higher than the $2.52 per-share estimate at an adjusted $2.62 per share.
    Robinhood — Shares of the retail brokerage moved 2% lower ahead of quarterly results due after the closing bell. Analysts polled by FactSet are forecasting a small quarterly loss of 1 cent.
    Freshworks — Shares of the software-as-a-service company popped more than 16% after Freshworks posted second-quarter revenue of $145.1 million, beating analysts’ expectations of $141.4 million as gauged by FactSet. The company also reported earnings per share of 7 cents, surpassing Wall Street’s estimate of 2 cents. Canaccord Genuity analyst David Hynes upgraded the stock to buy from hold and increased his price target to $25 from $15, citing Freshworks’ second-quarter operating margins and improved marketing and sales efficiency.

    AMD — The chip stock climbed more than 2% in premarket trading after the company posted better-than-expected second-quarter earnings and revenue. The company’s sales forecast for the third quarter was weaker than expected, however.
    Match Group — The Tinder and Match parent jumped 10% on a strong second-quarter earnings report. Match beat Wall Street expectations for both the top and bottom lines and said current-quarter revenue should come in above the consensus estimate of analysts, according to Refinitiv. BTIG upgraded the stock to buy from neutral following the report.
    Humana — The health insurer added 5.6% after reporting second-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $8.94, topping the $8.76 anticipated by analysts, per StreetAccount. The company also forecasted its Medicare Advantage business will grow by about 825,000 members this year.
    Starbucks — Shares of the coffee chain dipped more than 1% after Starbucks reported lighter-than-expected sales for its fiscal third quarter. The company reported $1 in adjusted earnings per share on $9.17 billion of revenue. Analysts surveyed by Refinitiv were looking for 95 cents on earnings per share but $9.29 billion of revenue. The miss came even as same store sales boomed in China.
    — CNBC’s Tanaya Macheel, Alex Harring, Yun Li, Jesse Pound, Samantha Subin, Brian Evans, and Michelle Fox Theobald contributed reporting. More

  • in

    HSBC CEO on Farage-Coutts spat: ‘We do not exit clients based on their lawful personal views’

    While refusing to discuss details of other banks and their clients, HSBC boss Quinn told CNBC on Tuesday that “our policy is not to debank or exit a client based on their lawful personal views.”
    The potential closure of Farage’s account with elite private bank Coutts triggered a heated debate in the U.K. and rocked the domestic banking industry.
    Farage was originally offered an account at high street bank NatWest as an alternative.

    HSBC’s U.K. headquarters are seen at the Canary Wharf financial district of London on July 31, 2018.
    Tolga Akmen | AFP | Getty Images

    LONDON — HSBC CEO Noel Quinn said Tuesday that the lender would not “exit a client based on their lawful personal views,” after Coutts’ termination of Brexit figurehead Nigel Farage’s account sparked a banking scandal in the U.K.
    Internal documents obtained by Trump ally Farage revealed that Coutts — a high-end private bank and wealth manager requiring clients to hold a minimum of £1 million ($1.29 million) in investments or borrowing, or £3 million in savings — had opted to cut ties with him once his mortgage was paid off in July, as his account was “below commercial criteria.”

    But the dossier also extensively cited Farage’s history of controversial views as part of the reason why he was deemed too commercially risky to remain a client, with the bank’s client analysis noting that he is “considered by many to be a disingenuous grifter,” and that “at worst, he is seen as xenophobic and racist.”
    At the time that he was given notice of the bank’s “exit plan” for his account, Farage was offered an alternative account with high street bank and Coutts’ parent company NatWest Group — but he declined.
    Although refusing to discuss details of other banks and their clients, HSBC boss Quinn told CNBC on Tuesday that “our policy is not to de-bank or exit a client based on their lawful personal views.”

    “Our primary responsibility is to try to help customers get access to banking and to open up an opportunity for them, whether that’s the homeless in the U.K. where we’ve taken on a significant number of new bank accounts for the homeless in the U.K. and for those that have suffered from human rights abuses,” Quinn said.
    “We also have a responsibility as an institution to look at any areas of financial crime compliance or we have an obligation to collect information on KYC (Know Your Customer), so we have those competing obligations but to reiterate, as a policy we do not exit clients based on their lawful personal views.”

    The closure of Farage’s account triggered a heated debate in the U.K. and rocked the domestic banking industry.
    NatWest CEO Alison Rose was forced to resign, after she admitted discussing details of Farage’s Coutts account with a BBC reporter in the wake of his allegations. Coutts CEO Peter Flavel also subsequently stepped down amid the fallout and public pressure, with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and other government ministers falling in line behind the former Brexit Party and UKIP leader.

    Jonathan Bachman | Getty Images

    Farage revealed on Tuesday that new Coutts interim CEO Mo Syed had written to inform him that he can retain both his personal and business accounts, but he is still seeking compensation from the bank and has launched a campaign to tackle account closures across the industry.
    Farage was originally offered an account at high street bank NatWest as an alternative, minimizing the risk of his losing access to banking services. But there are 1.1 million households across Britain without a bank account at all, according to the Resolution Foundation.
    Research from the British think tank showed that, of those 1.1 million, 327,000 people fell into the poorest decile in terms of net equivalized household income, while the second and third deciles accounted for 181,000 and 157,000 households, respectively.
    “Britain’s ‘unbanked’ are hugely disproportionately likely to be poor (close to half are in the poorest fifth of the income distribution). They’re also disproportionately likely to be young and living in a major city (where you’re four times more likely not to have a bank account than village dwellers),” Resolution Foundation CEO Torsten Bell wrote in a report published last week.
    “This data doesn’t tell us exactly why these households don’t have bank accounts — but given the huge concentration among poorer households I think we all know it’s got more to do with poverty than political views.” More

  • in

    U.S. House committee flags MSCI, BlackRock for China investments

    U.S. investments in around 50 blacklisted Chinese companies have drawn the attention of the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party.
    The committee on Tuesday announced it sent separate letters to MSCI and BlackRock asking for more information about the firms’ facilitation of U.S. investments into those Chinese companies.

    A bank employee count China’s renminbi (RMB) or yuan notes next to U.S. dollar notes at a Kasikornbank in Bangkok, Thailand, January 26, 2023.
    Athit Perawongmetha | Reuters

    BEIJING — U.S. investments in around 50 blacklisted Chinese companies have drawn the attention of the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party.
    The committee on Tuesday announced it sent separate letters to MSCI and BlackRock asking for more information about the firms’ facilitation of U.S. investments into those Chinese companies.

    The Chinese companies were blacklisted over claims of supporting China’s military or alleged human rights abuses, the committee said. It noted the initial review did not include one of the largest blacklists, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List.
    “The true scale is likely much larger,” the letters said.
    MSCI said in a statement it is reviewing the request for information, and that it doesn’t “facilitate” investments in any country. “MSCI indexes measure the performance of equity markets available to international investors, and comply with all applicable US laws,” the indexing giant said.
    BlackRock did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for comment.
    Here’s the full list of names, which are primarily state-owned companies:

    Combined list of Chinese companies flagged by U.S. House committee

    AECC Aero-Engine Control Company Limited

    AECC Aviation Power Co., Ltd.

    Aerospace Ch Auv Company Limited

    AVIC Aviation High-Technology Company Limited

    AVIC Electromechanical Systems Company Limited

    AVIC Heavy Machinery Company Limited

    AVIC Helicopter Company Limited

    AVIC Industry-Finance Holdings Company Limited (a.k.a. AVIC Capital Company Limited)

    AVIC Jonhon-Optronic Technology Co., Ltd.

    AVIC Shenyang Aircraft Company Limited

    AVIC Xi’an Aircraft Industry Group Company Limited

    Avicopter PLC

    BGI Genomics Co., Ltd.

    CETC Cyberspace Security Technology Co., Ltd.

    CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.

    CGN Power Co., Ltd.

    Changsha Jingjia Microelectronics Co., Ltd.

    China CSSC Holdings Ltd.

    China Mobile Communications Group Company Limited

    China National Chemical Corporation Ltd. (ChemChina)

    China National Chemical Engineering Group Corporation Limited

    China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC)

    China National Nuclear Corporation Hua Yuan Titanium Dioxide Company Limited

    China National Nuclear Power Company Limited

    China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC)

    China Railway Construction Corporation Limited (CRCC)

    China Spacesat Company Limited

    China State Construction Engineering Corporation Limited

    China State Construction Group Company Limited

    China State Construction International Investment Group Company Limited

    China Telecommunications Corporation Group

    China United Network Communications Group Company Limited

    CNOOC Energy & Technology Services Limited

    Costar Group Company Limited ? CRRC Corporation Ltd.

    CRRC Corporation Ltd.

    CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering (Group) Company Limited

    Dawning Information Industry Company Limited

    Fujian Torch Electron Technology Company Limited

    Hoshine Silicon Industry Company Limited

    Inspur Electronic Information Industry Company Limited

    Jiangxi Hongdu Aviation Industry (Group) Corporation Limited

    North Industries Group Red Arrow Company Limited

    Offshore Oil Engineering Company Limited

    Qihoo 360

    Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC)

    Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd.

    Zhejiang Dahua Technology Company Limited

    Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Company Limited

    ZTE Corporation

    Source: https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/media/press-releases/unconscionable-profit-fueling-chinas-military-select-committee-launches

    The U.S. House committee estimated that five BlackRock funds have invested more than $429 million into the blacklisted names. Those companies also accounted for nearly 5% of the MSCI China A Index’s value as of March 1, the committee said.

    U.S.-China tensions

    The request for information comes as the U.S. has increased its scrutiny of financial ties with China.
    Last week, the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly backed legislation that would require U.S. firms to notify the Treasury when investing in advanced Chinese technology on national security concerns. An earlier version of the legislation had called for investment restrictions.
    President Joe Biden has long been expected to issue an executive order that would restrict U.S. investment in high-end Chinese tech. No action has yet been announced.

    Last month, the House committee said it sent letters to four U.S. venture capital firms over their investments into Chinese artificial intelligence, semiconductor and quantum computing companies.
    The committee cited allegations that China was using such technologies for military development or perpetuation of human rights abuses.
    Beijing has denied such abuses, and published claims of “human rights violations in the United States.” More

  • in

    Bank of England’s next move divides economists as data paints a mixed picture

    Headline consumer price inflation slid to 7.9% in June from 8.7% in May, while core inflation — which excludes volatile energy, food, alcohol and tobacco prices — stayed sticky at an annualized 6.9%.
    As of Tuesday morning, the market was pricing around a 62% chance that the Monetary Policy Committee will opt for a 25 basis point hike to interest rates and take the main Bank rate to 5.25%.

    Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England, attends the Bank of England Monetary Policy Report Press Conference, at the Bank of England, London, Britain, February 2, 2023. 
    Pool | Reuters

    LONDON — Market expectations are split over the Bank of England’s next monetary policy move on Wednesday, as policymakers near a tipping point in their fight against inflation.
    As of Tuesday morning, the market was pricing around a 62% chance that the Monetary Policy Committee will opt for a 25 basis point hike to interest rates and take the main Bank rate to 5.25%, according to Refinitiv data.

    The other 38% of market participants expect a second consecutive 50 basis point hike, after the central bank surprised markets with a bumper increase in June. U.K. inflation looks to be abating, but is still running considerably hotter than in other advanced economies and well above the Bank’s 2% target.
    Headline consumer price inflation slid to 7.9% in June from 8.7% in May, while core inflation — which excludes volatile energy, food, alcohol and tobacco prices — stayed sticky at an annualized 6.9%, but retreated from the 31-year high of 7.1% of May.
    Data from the British Retail Consortium on Tuesday also showed annual shop price inflation cooled from 8.4% in June to 7.6% in July, and fell for the first time in two years in month-on-month terms, indicating that the country may be through the worst of its prolonged cost-of-living crisis.

    The British economy has proven surprisingly resilient, despite a run of 13 consecutive rate hikes from the Bank of England. The U.K. GDP flatlined in the three months to the end of May, but Britain is no longer projected to fall into recession.
    Goldman Sachs noted over the weekend that the MPC will be watching three indicators of inflationary persistence to determine how much additional monetary policy tightening is needed — slack in the labor market, wage growth and services inflation.

    “Following a very strong April labour market report in the run-up to the June meeting, jobs activity softened notably in May. Wage growth, however, has remained very firm with private sector regular pay rising further to 7.7%,” Goldman’s European economists James Moberly, Ibrahim Quadri and Jari Stehn highlighted.
    “While core inflation surprised to the downside in June, services inflation momentum remains strong. BoE officials have provided little guidance on how they assess the incoming data since the June meeting.”
    Given the limited read on how the MPC has received the latest two months of economic data, Goldman said this week’s meeting is a “close call,” but that the 25 basis point move is more likely than another half-point hike. The Wall Street giant expects an 8-1 split vote, with the one dissenting opinion in favor of keeping rates unchanged.

    “The overall dataset, while firm, is more mixed going into the August meeting than it was in the run-up to the June meeting, when data on the labour market, wage growth, and services inflation had all been surprising to the upside,” the economists said.
    “Furthermore, this week’s developments — including the weak flash PMI, non-committal messaging from the Fed and ECB, and receding market pricing for the August meeting — would support the case for a 25bp increase.”
    Both the U.S. Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank implemented quarter-point hikes last week and struck cautious tones. They highlighted that inflation is heading in the right direction but retains a hawkish tilt as it remains above target.
    MPC happy to ‘front-load’ tightening
    The initial PMI (purchasing managers’ index) readings for July indicated that the slowing economic momentum in the second quarter had continued into the third — especially in the services sector, where the Bank of England’s aggressive rate hikes finally appear to squeeze demand.
    Consumer confidence also fell sharply in July, and the latest figures put unemployment at 4% — above the Bank of England’s May forecast — with vacancies continuing to decline.
    The labor market remains very tight despite some loosening, and observers still marginally favor another big hike on Thursday.
    Barclays believes a half-point increase is in the cards, as wages and core inflation stay high, meaning more “resolute action” is a chance for the beleaguered MPC to “enhance credibility.”
    “We expect an 8-1 vote split (for +50bp vs hold), unchanged forward guidance, and for the forecasts to explicitly incorporate greater inflationary persistence,” Barclays economists Abbas Khan, Mariano Cena and Silvia Ardagna concluded in a research note Friday.
    This was echoed by BNP Paribas European economists Matthew Swannell and Paul Hollingsworth, who said that the MPC will be willing to “front-load” tightening, based on Governor Andrew Bailey’s comments at the Sintra central bank conference.

    “If we were really of the view that we were going to do 25 and then we were really sort of baked in for another 25 based on the evidence we’d seen, it would be better to do the 50,” Bailey justified the jumbo hike of June.
    “Even allowing for the inflation surprise, the data we have seen since June’s meeting clearly support the MPC delivering more than 25bp of further tightening, in our view,” Swannell and Hollingsworth said.
    Looking beyond this week’s meeting, Goldman Sachs said the meaningful progress in rebalancing labor market supply and demand so far was not yet sufficient for this to be the last increase in the Bank’s base rate, since further demand cooling and a sustainable return to the 2% headline inflation target are a long way off.
    “That said, this assessment is subject to significant uncertainty depending, in particular, on the growth outlook, the outlook for labour supply, and the formation of inflation expectations,” Goldman economists added.
    The lender therefore expects further 25 basis point increments to an eventual peak rate of 5.75%, or until the MPC sees signs of a meaningful slowdown in spot wage and services inflation. More

  • in

    CNBC’s top 200 global fintech companies: The complete list

    Ugur Karakoc | E+ | Getty Images

    From China’s Ant Group to Sweden’s Klarna, here is the complete list of the world’s top 200 fintech companies.
    CNBC partnered with independent research firm Statista to establish a transparent overview of the top fintech companies.

    related investing news

    12 hours ago

    2 days ago

    Statista analyzed over 1,500 firms across nine different market segments, evaluating each one against a set of key performance indicators, including revenue, user numbers, and total funding raised.
    The final list includes some of the biggest companies in the sector — Ant Group, Tencent, PayPal, Stripe, Klarna and Revolut — as well as several up-and-coming startups seeking to mold the future of financial services.
    The categories include:

    Neobanking
    Digital payments
    Digital assets
    Digital financial planning
    Digital wealth management
    Alternate financing
    Alternate lending
    Digital banking solutions
    Digital business solutions

    You can search by country, category, or company name to see which firms made the cut.

    For a deep dive on the categories and the standout trends within each one, click here.

    Methodology
    To identify the top 200 fintech companies, Statista carried out a quantitative analysis of the global market across nine categories.
    These categories reflect the fact that fintechs in different fields can’t be compared like-for-like. A business like Monzo, for example, operates in a very different manner to Stripe (Stripe isn’t a licensed bank and can’t originate its own loans).
    To help with the research, CNBC issued a public call for nominations in March, giving eligible fintechs the chance to share more information on their business model, revenue, transaction volumes, and other key data.
    Since many fintech businesses are privately held, they aren’t required to disclose their accounts publicly. Voluntary sharing of information about business models was key to analyzing the market.
    Statistics
    More than 1,500 fintech companies were assessed by Statista during the analysis period, and over 10,000 data points were assessed, including annual reports, company websites, and news articles.
    Statista developed a scoring model for the companies by calculating the aggregated scores on how firms performed versus their respective KPIs — revenues and revenue per employee, for example — along with a separate score on how the companies performed against specific KPIs within their respective market segments.
    Between five and 40 companies were selected for each individual market segment.
    To decide which ones should make the cut, Statista broke down the scoring model into a 40% weighting for general KPIs, and 60% for segment-specific KPIs.
    The companies with the highest score within their market segment made the list.
    The number of companies awarded per market segment varied depending on the size of the respective market segment. More

  • in

    From banking giants to lending up-and-comers — here are the world’s top 200 fintech companies

    From across the globe, spanning a diverse range of applications in finance — these are the world’s top 200 fintech companies.
    Together, CNBC and independent market research firm Statista worked to compile a comprehensive list of companies building innovative, tech-enabled and finance-related products and services.

    The partnership set out to list the top fintech companies using a clearly defined methodology identifying how various different companies performed against a set of key performance indicators, including total number of users, volumes, and revenues.
    The chosen companies have been divided up into nine categories: neobanking, digital payments, digital assets, digital financial planning, digital wealth management, alternate financing, alternate lending, digital banking solutions, and digital business solutions.
    This was done to account for the fact that business performance of fintechs in different fields of finance can’t be compared like-for-like.
    The fintech space has gone through a tumultuous period. Companies have seen their valuations slashed, funding is scarce, and businesses are cutting back on staffing and other costs in a bid to keep investors happy.
    At the same time, innovation is continuing to happen. Several firms are developing tools to help customers budget in more effective ways and predict what their future financial situation might look like.

    In the digital assets space, meanwhile, there’s been a greater focus on building technology to help improve some of the financial services industry’s biggest challenges, from moving money across borders to real-time settlement.
    CNBC has broken the list up category by category — from neobanking all the way down to digital business solutions.
    Quicklinks:

    For the full list and the methodology, click here.

    Neobanking

    Digital banks, or neobanks, are continuing to grow and develop new products. These are companies, typically with their own bank license, that have been set up with the aim of challenging large established lenders.
    Neobanks have been among the hardest hit by a souring of investors on fintech, particularly as their business model — spending lots to attain large numbers of customers and make money on card payments — has come under scrutiny with consumer spending slowing.
    Still, several neobanks have performed surprisingly well out of the rise in interest rates. Many have gotten into lending. In Europe, for example, Monzo recorded its first monthly profit after a jump in lending volume.
    There are many expected names present in the neobanks category, including Revolut, Monzo, and Starling. However, there are also less established players represented from emerging markets, like Nigeria-based fintech Kuda and Indian foreign exchange startup Niyo.

    Digital payments

    The worldwide digital payments industry is currently estimated to be worth over $54 trillion, according to data from JPMorgan — and that’s only set to grow as more of the world starts to see digital adoption.
    It’s a colossal market, with many different players fighting it out for their slice of the hyper-competitive pie. But that has meant there’s been room for other industry players to innovate and compete with their own offerings as well.
    Statista identified 40 firms as top digital payments companies. These include major players such as Chinese mobile wallet Alipay and tech giant Tencent, which operates the WeChat Pay payment services, and U.S. online payments powerhouse Stripe.
    Klarna, Affirm, and Afterpay also feature. The buy now, pay later space has been under huge pressure amid fears of a drop in consumer spending — but it has equally become a lifeline for many as rising inflation forces people to search for flexible payment methods.
    Lesser-known firms, including French telecoms firm Orange and payments compliance startup Signifyd, were also selected. Orange operates Orange Money, a mobile money service. It is highly popular in Africa and counts more than 80 million accounts worldwide.

    Digital assets

    Digital assets is a market that has faced huge pressure recently, not least because the regulatory environment for firms has become much tougher following major collapses of notable names such as FTX, Terra, and Celsius.
    It’s also incredibly sensitive to movements in prices of digital currencies, which have depreciated considerably since the peak of the most recent crypto rally in November 2021. Exchanges in particular saw their revenues dry up as trading volumes evaporated.
    Valuations of companies in the digital assets space have taken major haircuts. And this pain has filtered through to the private markets, too.
    Binance, which features as one of the top digital asset companies, is under heightened scrutiny from regulators around the world.
    In the U.S., Binance is accused by the U.S. SEC of mishandling customer funds and knowingly offering investors unregistered securities while publicly saying that it doesn’t operate there.
    For its part, Binance denies the allegations.
    It was important that the company be included, given it remains the largest crypto exchange around and is a prolific backer of ventures focusing on so-called Web3.
    Efforts are underway globally to bring digital assets into the regulatory fold. In the U.K., the government has made a play to become a “crypto hub.” And the European Union is making rapid strides with landmark .
    Alongside crypto heavyweights Binance and Coinbase, Statista also identified Cayman Islands-based crypto exchange BitMart and nonfungible token marketplace OpenSea as top fintech companies operating in the digital assets category. 

    Digital financial planning

    Financial planning is another big area of finance that’s being reshaped by technology, as people have turned to online tools to manage their financial lives in favor of more cumbersome paper-based options.
    There are now plenty of online platforms that enable users to get better visibility over their finances. Education has become a big focus for many players, too — particularly in light of the rising cost of living, which has put significant pressure on household budgets.
    In this field, Statista identified 20 names that fit the bill as companies leading the pack globally when it comes to innovating in financial planning. 
    They range from those changing the way people select and educate themselves about financial products, like NerdWallet, to services seeking to help people build up their credit scores, like Credit Karma.

    Digital wealth management

    A plethora of tech startups have rocked the wealth management space over the past several years with lower fees, smoother onboarding, and more accessible asset picking and trading experiences.
    The likes of Robinhood and eToro lowered the barrier to entry for people wanting to own stocks and other assets, build up their portfolios, and acquire the kind of knowledge about financial markets that has previously been the privilege of only a few wealthy pros.
    In the Covid-19 era, people built up a glut of savings thanks to fiscal stimulus designed to stem the impacts of lockdowns on world economies. That was a boon to fintechs in the wealth management space, as consumers were more willing to part with their cash for riskier investments.
    These companies have been under strain more recently, though. Interest from amateur traders has slipped from the heyday of the 2020 and 2021 retail investing boom. And, as with other areas of fintech, there’s been a greater focus on profitability and building a sustainable business.
    In response, platforms sought to prioritize product development and longer-term investing experiences to continue attracting customers. In the context of high interest rates, several companies launched the ability to invest in government bonds and other high-yield savings options.
    In the wealth management category, Statista identified 20 names. They include Robinhood, eToro, and Wealthfront, among others.

    Alternate financing

    Small and medium-sized businesses, which are often turned away by established banks, have increasingly turned to new forms of financing to get the necessary funds to grow their business, meet their overheads, and pay off outstanding debts.
    Equity crowdfunding has given companies a chance to give early customers the ability to own part of the services they’re using. 
    Meanwhile, revenue-based financing, or borrowing against a percentage of future ongoing revenues in exchange for money invested, became a more popular way for firms typically turned away by banks and venture capitalists alike to get access to funding.
    Higher interest rates arguably make these forms of financing more attractive versus seeking loans, which are now far more costly — though it does pose challenges for these businesses, as their own ability to raise capital themselves becomes more difficult.
    In the alternate financing category, 20 firms were awarded. They range from Patreon, the popular membership service for online content creators, to crowdfunding companies Kickstarter and Republic.

    Alternate lending

    Non-bank lending has been a rising trend in the financial services industry over the last several years.
    Tech startups looked to provide a better experience than banking incumbents, using cloud computing and artificial intelligence to improve service quality and ensure faster decisioning on loan applications.
    The global digital lending platforms market is forecast to be worth $11.5 billion in 2023, according to GlobalData, and this is expected to grow to $46.5 billion by 2030.
    Over the last year or so, a number of fintechs pivoted to lending as the primary driver of their business, looking to benefit from rising interest rates — the Federal Reserve, Bank of England and numerous other central banks have rapidly raised rates to combat inflation.
    Lending also tends to be the more lucrative part of finance, more generally.
    While digital payments is often the area that draws most investor buzz, lending generates more money in financial services. Payments, by contrast, is a notoriously low-margin business since companies tend to make money by taking a small cut of the value of each transaction.
    Statista identified 25 fintech companies that fall into the category of top alternate lending firms.
    They include American small business lending firm Biz2Credit, Irish e-commerce lending company Wayflyer, and Latvian loan refinancing startup Mintos.

    Digital banking solutions

    An emerging category of fintech companies takes a different approach to disrupting financial incumbents — giving other companies the ability to offer their own digital banking offerings rather than being the face of those services themselves.
    Banking-as-a-service has been a buzzword in fintech for some time now. It’s not exactly a well-known term, but it refers to the ability for non-financial companies to provide their customers a range of financial products including checking accounts, cards, and loans.
    Embedded finance, where third-party financial services like bank accounts, brokerage accounts and insurance policies are integrated into other businesses’ platforms, has also gained traction.
    Another theme that falls within this world is open banking, or the ability for non-bank firms to launch new financial services using customers’ account data.
    Digital banking solutions has become a more closely-watched aspect of fintech, as attention has turned away from consumer-oriented services to business-focused ones. However, it hasn’t been without its own challenges.
    Like other areas of fintech, the space has been vulnerable to a funding crunch as hawkish central bank actions have made capital more expensive. Railsr, formerly a U.K. fintech darling, entered liquidation in March after reports that it was struggling to find a buyer. 
    “Not all programs were created equal,” Peter Hazlehurst, CEO of Synctera, one of the top 200 awardees, told CNBC. “As a result, a number of folks were unable to raise their next round or continue to grow or to continue to get customers.”
    In the digital banking solutions category, 15 firms were awarded, including Airwallex, ClearBank, and Solaris.

    Digital business solutions

    Digital business solutions might not be the most attractive part of fintech, but it’s the one gaining much of the love from investors at the moment.
    These are companies selling a range of financial solutions to businesses, ranging from accounting and finance, to human resources and anti-fraud solutions.
    As the economic outlook has darkened for many businesses, the need for products that help firms deal with their own costs and operate in a compliant manner has become critical.
    In the digital business solutions category, Statista identified 25 companies.
    They include tax and accounting software firm Intuit, human resources platform Deel, and fraud prevention startup Seon.  More