More stories

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: UnitedHealth, Wells Fargo, Pinterest and others

    Check out the companies making headlines before the bell:
    UnitedHealth (UNH) – The health insurer’s stock rose 1.7% in the premarket after its quarterly earnings and revenue beat forecasts, and it raised its full-year outlook. The company’s results were helped in part by a strong performance at its Optum health care services unit.

    Wells Fargo (WFC) – The bank reported quarterly earnings of 74 cents per share, which included an 8-cent equity impairment charge, compared with a consensus estimate of 80 cents. Revenue fell short of Wall Street forecasts during the quarter. Wells Fargo’s profit fell from a year ago as it set aside more money to cover possible bad loans, and the stock fell 1% in premarket trading.
    Pinterest (PINS) – The image-sharing company’s stock soared 15.9% in premarket action after the Wall Street Journal reported that activist investor Elliot Management became a major shareholder, accumulating a more than 9% stake.
    Rio Tinto (RIO) – The mining company’s stock fell 1.7% in the premarket after it warned that labor shortages in Australia would impact its second-quarter earnings.
    BlackRock (BLK) – The asset management firm earned an adjusted $7.36 per share for the second quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $7.90, with revenue also falling short of forecasts. Profit was down 30% from a year ago amid the global market turmoil that discouraged investors. BlackRock fell 1% in premarket trading.
    Vertical Aerospace (EVTL) – The maker of electric aviation vehicles saw its stock surge 13.1% in premarket action after it announced a 50-vehicle order from European business jet operator FLYINGGROUP.
    Solar stocks – Stocks in solar-related companies fell in the premarket after Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said he would not support new climate change funding bills. Sunrun (RUN) slid 7.6%, SunPower (SPWR) fell 5%, SolarEdge Technologies (SEDG) lost 3.7% and First Solar (FSLR) fell 3.1%.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Investing on the graveyard shift: Two new ETFs look to capture the ‘night effect’

    Live, Mondays, 1 PM ET

    Two new ETFs out this summer are working the overnight shift.
    The NightShares 500 [NSPY] and NightShares 2000 ETFs [NIWM] are doing something no ETF has done before: Take advantage of the so-called “night effect.”

    According to NightShares CEO Bruce Lavine, stocks bought at the market close and sold when markets open again in the morning often outperform based on research going back about 14 years.
    “In the case of small-caps, over many, many years the daytime return is negative on the Russell 2000 [.RUT],” Lavine told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” on Monday. “We have two funds, large-cap [NSPY] and small-cap [NIWM], that are trying to… capture this effect for investors.”
    Lavine’s after-hours strategy places an emphasis large- and small-cap stocks. For expample, his firm’s NightShares 2000 ETF, for example, is designed to track the Russell 2000 in the wee hours.
    He cites news flow as a key factor behind the “night effect.” It’s a time, he contends, when investors often feel the need to catch up with the effects of earnings, mergers and acquisitions.
    Risk aversion at financial institutions also plays a big part in Lavine’s bullishness on the overnights.

    ‘They leave something on the table’

    “People have this sort of desire to go home flat sometimes so they can sleep at night,” Lavine said. “They leave something on the table for the other investors.”
    Lavine expects the “night effect” and its related behavioral phenomena sticking around.
    “Statistically, bear markets happen during the day session,” Lavine said. “It’s much more frequent.” 
    So far, the ETFs are underperforming the Russell 2000 and Dow since their inception on June 28.
    The NightShares 500 and NightShares 2000 ETFs are down 5.7% and 6.9%, respectively. Meanwhile, the Russell 2000 is off 3.6% and the Dow is off 2.6%.
    Disclaimer More

  • in

    Fed Governor Waller expects 0.75 percentage point hike, but open to a larger one

    Fed Governor Christopher Waller said he expects to raise the central bank’s benchmark interest rate 75 basis points this month but that he’s open to a larger move depending on incoming data.
    He specifically cited retail sales and housing as two key metrics.
    Markets are pricing in a high probability of a 100 basis point, or full percentage point, increase. Waller said the market is “getting ahead of itself.”

    Christopher Waller, U.S. President Donald Trump’s nominee for governor of the Federal Reserve, speaks during a Senate Banking Committee confirmation hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S, on Thursday, Feb. 13, 2020.
    Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he’s willing to consider what would be the most aggressive interest rate hike in decades at the central bank’s meeting later this month.
    Waller said he supports a 75 basis point hike at the July 26-27 meeting. But he will be watching data and keeping an open mind about what the Fed should do to control inflation, which is running at its fastest pace since 1981.

    The rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee approved a 75 basis point move in June, the largest one-month increase since 1994.
    “I support another 75-basis point increase” at the next FOMC meeting, Waller said in remarks at an event in Victor, Idaho.

    “However, my base case for July depends on incoming data,” he added. “We have important data releases on retail sales and housing coming in before the July meeting. If that data comes in materially stronger than expected, it would make me lean towards a larger hike at the July meeting to the extent it shows demand is not slowing down fast enough to get inflation down.”
    Following Wednesday’s consumer price index data showing 12-month inflation at 9.1%, markets started pricing in a full percentage point, or 100 basis point, increase in the Fed’s benchmark short-term borrowing rate. The probability for that outcome stood at nearly 80% on Thursday morning but receded to 44% in the afternoon, according to CME Group data. Though he said he’s open to the larger hike, Waller said the earlier aggressive market pricing was “kind of getting ahead of itself.”
    Retail sales data will be released Friday and is expected to reflect a spending increase of 0.9% in June, a month when the CPI rose 1.1%. The figures are not adjusted for inflation.

    Numbers on housing starts and building permits are due July 19; starts tumbled 14.4% in May, while permits fell 7%. Permits for June are expected to edge lower, while starts are expected to go higher, according to FactSet estimates.
    “If I see the incoming data the next two weeks coming in and showing me that demand is still really strong and robust, then I’m going to lean into a higher rate hike,” Waller said.
    If the Fed takes the 100 basis point route, it would mark the biggest one-month increase since the early 1980s, when the central bank was trying to control runaway inflation.
    Getting prices down is the paramount mission of the Fed now, said Waller, who expects still more rate hikes even after this month’s.
    “I think we need to move swiftly and decisively to get inflation falling in a sustained way, and then consider what further tightening will be needed to achieve our dual mandate,” he said.
    While he expressed strong concern about inflation, Waller was more optimistic about the economy.
    Worries are mounting that the U.S. is headed for or already in a recession, but Waller said the strength of the jobs market has him “feeling fairly confident that the U.S. economy did not enter a recession in the first half of 2022 and that the economic expansion will continue.”
    Even with the Fed tightening, he said he thinks the economy can achieve a “soft landing” that won’t include a recession. U.S. GDP contracted 1.6% in the first quarter, and the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker is indicating a 1.2% decline in Q2, meeting the rule-of-thumb definition of a recession.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Powell, Clarida cleared of wrongdoing in Fed trading controversy

    Fed Chair Jerome Powell and former Vice Chair Richard Clarida didn’t break any rules or laws while trading securities, the Fed’s inspector general said Thursday.
    While the report cleared Powell and Clarida, Bialek said evaluations of trades from other top Fed officials are ongoing.

    Controversial trading activities from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and former Vice Chairman Richard Clarida didn’t break any rules or laws, the central bank’s Office of Inspector General ruled Thursday.
    The report covered a period from 2019-21 when the two top-ranking officials traded stocks and funds while the central bank used monetary policy to influence financial markets.

    The period included the weeks before the Covid-19 pandemic declaration as the Fed was slashing interest rates and instituting other market supports, moves that would intensify following the pandemic declaration.
    “We did not find evidence to substantiate the allegations that former Vice Chair Clarida or you violated laws, rules, regulations, or policies related to trading activities as investigated by our office,” Inspector General Mark Bialek told Powell in a letter. “Based on our findings, we are closing our investigation into the trading activities of former Vice Chair Clarida and you.”

    Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks to reporters after the Federal Reserve raised its target interest rate by three-quarters of a percentage point to stem a disruptive surge in inflation, during a news conference following a two-day meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) in Washington, U.S., June 15, 2022. 
    Elizabeth Frantz | Reuters

    While the report cleared Powell and Clarida, Bialek said evaluations of trades from other top Fed officials are ongoing.
    Former regional presidents Robert Kaplan of Dallas and Eric Rosengren of Boston retired following disclosures of their investment portfolio activities. Clarida also left, stepping down in January just before assuming a teaching job at Columbia University.
    The OIG found “that I went above and beyond financial ethics and disclosure requirements during my tenure as Vice Chair,” Clarida said in a statement.

    “I have always been committed to conducting myself with integrity and respect for the obligations of public service, and this report reaffirms that lifelong commitment to exceeding ethical standards,” he added.
    Earlier this year, the Fed adopted a stringent set of new rules that prohibit officials from trading individual stocks and bonds as well as cryptocurrencies.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Dimon rips Fed stress test as 'terrible way to run' financial system after his bank halts buybacks

    Asked by veteran banking analyst Betsy Graseck of Morgan Stanley on Thursday about the Federal Reserve’s recent stress test, Dimon unleashed a series of critiques about the annual exercise, which was implemented after the 2008 financial crisis nearly capsized the world’s economy.
    JPMorgan is scrambling to generate more capital to help it comply with the results of the Fed test, including by halting its share repurchases.
    Other steps the bank has been forced to take: JPMorgan is pulling back on “risk-weighted assets,” which broadly means anything on the bank’s balance sheet that requires capital to be held against it. As one example, JPMorgan is planning to dump mortgages held in its portfolio, Dimon said.

    Jamie Dimon, CEO of JP Morgan Chase, speaking at the Business Roundtable CEO Innovation Summit in Washington, D.C. on Dec. 6th, 2018. 
    Janvhi Bhojwani | CNBC

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon didn’t mince words when it came to the regulatory process that forced his bank to suspend its stock buybacks.
    Asked by veteran banking analyst Betsy Graseck of Morgan Stanley on Thursday about the Federal Reserve’s recent stress test, Dimon unleashed a series of critiques about the annual exercise, which was implemented after the 2008 financial crisis nearly capsized the world’s economy.

    “We don’t agree with the stress test,” Dimon said. “It’s inconsistent. It’s not transparent. It’s too volatile. It’s basically capricious, arbitrary.”

    JPMorgan, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, is scrambling to generate more capital to help it comply with the results of the Fed test. Last month, steadily increasing capital requirements within the test hit the biggest global financial institutions, forcing the New York-based bank to freeze its dividend. While Citigroup made a similar announcement, rivals including Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo boosted investor payouts.
    Under the exam’s hypothetical scenario, JPMorgan was expected to lose around $44 billion as markets crashed and unemployment surged, Dimon said. He essentially called that figure bunk on Thursday, asserting that his bank would continue to earn money during a downturn.
    After JPMorgan released second-quarter results, it disclosed a raft of other measures it is taking to husband capital, including by temporarily halting share repurchases. That move, in particular, wasn’t welcomed by investors, as the stock hasn’t been this cheap in years.
    Shares of the bank fell as much as 5%, hitting a fresh 52-week low.

    Big changes

    CFO Jeremy Barnum added to the conversation, saying that while regulators give plenty of information about the contours of the annual exam, a key element of the so-called stress capital buffer doesn’t get released to banks, making it “really very hard at any given moment to understand what’s actually driving it.”
    “We feel very good about building [capital] quickly enough to meet the higher requirements,” Barnum said. “But they’re pretty big changes that come into effect fairly quickly for banks, and I think that’s probably not healthy.”
    Other steps the bank has been forced to take: JPMorgan is pulling back on “risk-weighted assets,” which broadly means anything on the bank’s balance sheet that requires capital to be held against it. As one example, JPMorgan is planning to dump mortgages held in its portfolio, Dimon said.
    A consequence of these moves is that JPMorgan, a massive institution with a $3.8 trillion balance sheet, is forced to withdraw credit from the financial system just as storm clouds gather on the world’s biggest economy.
    The actions happen to coincide with the Fed’s so-called quantitative tightening plans, which call for a reversal of the central bank’s bond-purchasing efforts, including for mortgages, which could further roil the market and drive up borrowing costs.

    ‘Making it worse’

    The upshot is that the bank has to act at “precisely the wrong time reducing credit to the marketplace,” Dimon said.
    The moves will ultimately impact ordinary Americans, particularly lower-income minorities who typically have the hardest time obtaining loans to begin with, he said.
    “It’s not good for the United States economy and in particular, it’s bad for lower-income mortgages,” Dimon said. “You haven’t fixed the mortgage business and then we’re making it worse.”
    During a media call Thursday, Dimon told reporters that while JPMorgan isn’t exiting the business, the capital rules could force other banks to recede from home loans entirely. Wells Fargo has said it would shrink the business after surging interest rates caused a steep drop in volume.
    Instead, JPMorgan will originate mortgages, then immediately offload them, he said.
    “It’s a terrible way to run a financial system,” Dimon said. “It just causes huge confusion about what you should be doing with your capital.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    JPMorgan CEO Dimon sums up U.S. economy in one paragraph — and it sounds bad

    On the one hand, Dimon said the U.S. “economy continues to grow and both the job market and consumer spending, and their ability to spend, remain healthy.”
    “But geopolitical tension, high inflation, waning consumer confidence, the uncertainty about how high rates have to go and the never-before-seen quantitative tightening and their effects on global liquidity … are very likely to have negative consequences on the global economy sometime down the road,” he warned.

    Jamie Dimon, chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
    Christophe Morin | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon on Thursday summarized the state of the U.S. economy in one paragraph, and it’s not all good.
    On the one hand, Dimon said the U.S. “economy continues to grow and both the job market and consumer spending, and their ability to spend, remain healthy.”

    He then rattled off a number of warning signs, saying: “But geopolitical tension, high inflation, waning consumer confidence, the uncertainty about how high rates have to go and the never-before-seen quantitative tightening and their effects on global liquidity, combined with the war in Ukraine and its harmful effect on global energy and food prices are very likely to have negative consequences on the global economy sometime down the road.”
    Dimon’s comments, which were made in JPMorgan Chase’s latest quarterly release, come as investors and economists try to make out whether the economy is headed for a recession — and the recent spate of economic data isn’t providing much clarity.

    The good

    For the moment, there aren’t any signs the U.S. economy is entering a recession, according to comments JPMorgan executives made on their earnings call.
    As Dimon said, the labor market seems to be in solid footing. Last month, the U.S. economy added 372,000 jobs, topping a Dow Jones estimate of 250,000. Meanwhile, average hourly wages grew last month at 5.1% year-over-year pace.

    Consumer spending also seems to be chugging along, albeit at a subdued pace. Spending in May rose 0.2%, below a Reuters estimate for a 0.4% gain.

    Even within JPMorgan’s own business there were signs of consumer strength. Consumers are still spending on discretionary areas like travel and dining. At its consumer and community banking division, combined debit and credit card spending was up 15% in the second quarter. Card loans were up 16% with continued strong new account originations.
    However, the good news may end there.

    The bad

    The consumer price index — a widely followed measure of inflation — rose last month by 9.1% from the year-earlier period. That topped a Dow Jones forecast of 8.8% and market the fastest pace for inflation going back to 1981.
    A big driver for that increase is a surge in energy prices. West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. oil benchmark, is up more than 28% in in 2022, as the war between Ukraine and Russia raises concern over already tight supply in the market.
    Higher prices have also dented U.S. consumer sentiment. The University of Michigan’s consumer sentiment index hit a record low last month, tumbling to 50.
    These inflationary pressures have pushed the Federal Reserve to tighten monetary policy this year more quickly than investors anticipated. Last month, the central bank hiked rates by 0.75 percentage point, and some economists on Wall Street expect the Fed to hike by as much as a full point later in July.
    Inflation has also had massive political ramifications in the U.S.
    According to a poll conducted by the Pew Research Center, President Joe Biden’s approval rating has slumped to 37% — with a majority of Americans saying his policies have made the economy worse. Pew also found that just 13% of Americans rate U.S. economic conditions as “excellent/good.”
    Dimon’s remarks follow comments he made last month in which he warned investors to brace themselves for an economic “hurricane.”
    Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis, and live business day programming from around the world.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves midday: JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Conagra Brands and more

    Pedestrians pass in front of a JPMorgan & Chase bank branch automated teller machine (ATM) kiosk in downtown Chicago, Illinois.
    Christopher Dilts | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading.
    JPMorgan Chase – Shares of JPMorgan Chase sunk 3.49% and hit a 52-week low after the bank reported quarterly earnings that missed analyst expectations, as the bank built reserves for bad loans. CEO Jamie Dimon said that high inflation, waning consumer confidence and geopolitical tension are likely to hurt the global economy going forward. The bank also announced it would temporarily suspend share buybacks.

    Goldman Sachs – Shares of Goldman Sachs fell 2.95% following disappointing earnings from JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley. The bank is scheduled to report its own quarterly earnings on Monday.
    Conagra Brands – The food stock sank 7.25% after Conagra’s quarterly results revealed the company’s sales volume declined. In other words, revenue growth came from sales mix and price increases. Conagra’s earnings and revenue for the previous quarter came in close to analyst expectations.
    First Republic Bank — Shares rose 1.77% after the bank reported earnings that surpassed expectations on the top and bottom lines. First Republic Bank posted earnings of $2.16 per share on revenue of $1.5 billion. Analysts were expecting earnings of $2.09 per share on revenue of $1.47 billion, according to consensus estimates from FactSet.
    Cisco – Shares of Cisco fell nearly 1% after JPMorgan downgraded the stock to neutral from outperform. The bank also recommended investors rotate into a “more diversified supplier” such as rival Juniper Networks.
    Energy stocks – The energy sector led losses in the S&P 500, slipping more than 3%. Shares of Halliburton, Diamondback Energy, Marathon Oil, Coterra Energy and Chevron all closed lower.

    Costco – Shares of retailer Costco jumped 4% after Deutsche Bank upgraded the stock to buy and increasing its price target to $575 from $525. Deutsche said Costco is “is one of the most consistent operators in our group, and its steady traffic gains and high membership renewal rates serve as key differentiators in an increasingly uncertain backdrop.”
    — CNBC’s Sarah Min and Jesse Pound contributed reporting

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Inflation poses a 'clear and present danger,' says Manchin: Economists weigh in on how it can hurt and help consumers

    The Consumer Price Index, an inflation barometer, jumped 9.1% in June versus a year earlier, the highest annual increase since November 1981.
    Policymakers aim for a low, stable and predictable inflation rate around 2% over the long term.
    Here’s why economists generally view persistently high inflation as bad for consumers and the economy and why some people are coming out ahead.

    A person shops for groceries on March 10, 2022 in the Prospect Lefferts Garden neighborhood of Brooklyn.
    Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Inflation hit a new 40-year high in June, and policymakers are working feverishly to tame it — perhaps even risking recession to do so.  
    Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, said in June that price stability is “the bedrock of the economy.” The central bank is raising borrowing costs aggressively to tamp down on consumer demand and put a lid on rising prices.

    “The worst mistake we could make would be to fail, which — it’s not an option,” Powell said.
    More from Personal Finance:Why inflation is less likely to hurt some retireesSocial Security cost-of-living adjustment could be 10.5% in 2023Workers may see biggest raises since Great Recession next year
    Sen. Joe Manchin, a centrist Democrat from West Virginia, said Wednesday that inflation “poses a clear and present danger to our economy.”
    But while the specter of persistently high inflation can be scary for policymakers and consumers, experts point out that, in certain circumstances, some consumers stand to benefit from inflation. More broadly, some inflation is actually a good thing for the economy. Let’s look at how the issue breaks down, with a focus on consumer impact.

    The big inflation problem: ‘People are getting poorer’

    Among the major concerns about persistently high inflation is a decline in Americans’ standard of living.

    Inflation measures how fast prices for goods and services such as gasoline, food, clothing, rent, travel and health care are increasing. The Consumer Price Index, which measures changes in price for a broad basket of items, jumped 9.1% in June versus a year earlier, the highest annual rise since November 1981.
    Those prices don’t exist in a vacuum, however. Household income may rise, too, courtesy of pay raises for workers and cost-of-living adjustments for pensioners, for example.
    In theory, if someone’s income grows faster than prices, their standard of living improves. In this scenario, their so-called “real wages” (wages after accounting for inflation) are rising.

    Here’s the problem: Inflation is outstripping historically strong pay growth.  
    Private-sector workers saw their hourly wages after inflation fall by 3.6% from June 2021 to June 2022, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s the largest decline since at least 2007, when the agency started tracking the data.
    Seniors and others living on a fixed or static income can be hit especially hard by galloping inflation, according to economists.

    “The clear downside of what is happening right now — which is driven largely but not exclusively by commodity prices [like oil] — is people are getting poorer,” according to Alex Arnon, the associate director of policy analysis for the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a research arm of the University of Pennsylvania. “And they’ll live less pleasant lives, most likely.”
    This dynamic can have knock-on effects. From a behavioral perspective, consumers may change what they buy to help defray costs. An outright pullback can feed into a recession, given consumer spending is the lifeblood of the U.S. economy. Personal consumption makes up about 70% of gross domestic product.

    Home sales, wage growth may push some ahead

    While average household wages have shrunk in the past year due to inflation, some Americans may still be coming out ahead when considering their total wealth, according to Wendy Edelberg, a senior fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution.
    Edelberg, a former chief economist at the Congressional Budget Office, cited “extraordinary increases in real estate prices” as an example.
    About two-thirds of Americans own a home. The value of a typical home sold in May by existing owners exceeded $400,000 for the first time, and was up almost 15% from a year ago, according to the National Association of Realtors. (There are signs the housing market may be cooling, though.)

    Allen J. Schaben | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    And certain groups come out ahead in an inflationary environment.
    For example, some have seen a dramatic increase in pay that exceeds inflation. Rank-and-file workers in leisure and hospitality, which includes restaurants, bars and hotels, saw hourly earnings grow 10.2% in the year through June, according to U.S. Department of Labor data — about 1 percentage point above the inflation rate. (Of course, just because their pay growth exceeds inflation doesn’t mean these workers necessarily earn a living wage. The average nonmanager made $17.79 an hour in June.)
    Consumers with fixed-rate mortgages and other loans that don’t fluctuate based on prevailing interest rates may have an easier time paying those preexisting debts, especially if their wages are exceeding rising prices broadly, according to James Devine, an economics professor at Loyola Marymount University.
    “On the one hand, people gain from inflation (as debtors) but on the other they lose if their money wages fall behind inflation (as wage-earners),” Devine said in an email.
    Generally, it takes a year or more for everyday people to push up their wages to catch up with prices, Devine said.

    Hyperinflation represents a rare, ‘disastrous’ scenario

    Then there’s hyperinflation: a rare and “disastrous” scenario in which inflation surges by 1,000% or more in a year, according to the International Monetary Fund. In 2008, Zimbabwe had one of the worst-ever episodes of hyperinflation, which was estimated at one point to be 500 billion percent, for example, according to the IMF.
    At these extremes, bread prices, for example, could start and end the day at different levels — a dynamic that could lead to hoarding of perishable goods and shortages that further drive up prices. The value of a nation’s currency may fall significantly, making imports from other countries exorbitantly costly.

    Zimbabweans queue to withdraw money from a bank on June 21, 2008 in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
    John Moore | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Savings are eaten up as the value of money erodes, ultimately leading to less investment, reduced productivity and stalled economic growth — a recipe for chronic recession if left unchecked, Brian Bethune, an economist and professor at Boston College, said of potential consequences.
    To be clear: The U.S. isn’t remotely close to this.
    “We’re not there,” according to Edelberg. “We’re not all going out and purchasing rice because we think rice is a better store of value than dollars.”
    However, some fear the Federal Reserve will inadvertently tip the U.S. into a recession as it raises its benchmark interest rate to reduce inflation. That’s not a foregone conclusion; a downturn, if it comes to pass, would be accompanied by job loss and accompanying financial hardship.

    The worst mistake we could make would be to fail, which — it’s not an option.

    Jerome Powell
    chair of the Federal Reserve

    On the opposite end of the spectrum, there’s deflation — an environment of falling prices, which is also undesirable.
    For example, consumers may delay purchases if they expect to pay a lower price in the future, thereby reducing economic activity and growth, according to the International Monetary Fund.
    Businesses would likely need to give pay cuts to staff — which workers hate, even if their lower earnings can buy the same amount of stuff (which is also falling in value), economists said.

    Consumer inflation expectations are ‘absolutely key’

    Which is all to say: Policymakers generally view some inflation as a good thing for the economy.
    The key is that it’s low and stable enough so people don’t notice — hence the Federal Reserve’s target rate of about 2% over the long term. (The central bank’s preferred inflation measure, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, is a bit different from the Consumer Price Index.)
    Low, stable inflation helps keep consumer expectations in check. If consumers anticipate persistently high inflation — even if those expectations are unhinged from reality — those whims can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    For instance, there’s the notion of a “wage-price spiral,” in which workers demand higher raises to keep up with what they expect to be entrenched inflation. Businesses raise their prices for consumers to compensate for the higher labor costs, which can become a vicious cycle, according to economists.
    In that type of environment, banks might also raise borrowing costs for a loan, under the assumption inflation (and interest rates) will remain high. However, if inflation and prevailing interest rates then plunge and borrowers can’t refinance a fixed loan, they’ll get “hammered” when they have to pay that money back, Edelberg said.
    While consumers anticipate higher prices in the short term (over the next year), their inflation expectations over the mid- and longer terms (three and five years) declined in May, according to a Federal Reserve Bank of New York survey issued Monday.
    New York Fed researchers see that as a good sign. The data suggest inflation expectations haven’t yet become entrenched, meaning the dynamics for a wage-price spiral and a self-fulfilling prophecy don’t appear to be present, researchers said.
    Fed chair Powell echoed that sentiment recently.
    “We think that the public generally sees us as very likely to be successful in getting inflation down to 2%, and that’s critical,” he said in June. “It’s absolutely key to the whole thing that we sustain that confidence.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More