More stories

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves premarket: GameStop, T-Mobile, Sonos and others

    Check out the companies making headlines before the bell:
    GameStop (GME) – GameStop surged 14.3% in the premarket on reports that the videogame retailer is starting a new division to focus on cryptocurrency partnerships and NFTs.

    T-Mobile (TMUS) – T-Mobile reported fourth-quarter postpaid net subscriber additions of 844,000 and total 2021 additions of about 2.9 million. The fourth-quarter numbers for the wireless service provider were below consensus estimates of 868,000, and the stock fell 1.8% in premarket trading.
    STMicroelectronics (STM) – STMicro issued preliminary fourth-quarter revenue figures that were higher than analysts were anticipating. The chip maker’s sales came in at $3.56 billion, compared with a consensus estimate of $3.41 billion, amid increasing demand and a worldwide chip shortage. STMicro shares jumped 4.2% in premarket action.
    Sonos (SONO) – The speaker maker’s stock rallied 4% in the premarket, following an International Trade Commission ruling that Alphabet’s Google infringed on some Sonos audio patents in its Nest speakers. Google plans to appeal the decision.
    Quidel (QDEL) – Quidel said it expects to report revenue of $633 million to $637 million for the fourth quarter, well above the consensus estimate of $466 million. The diagnostics company is benefiting from increased demand for its Covid-19 tests, as well as tests for other diseases. Quidel gained 4.8% premarket trading.
    DraftKings (DKNG) – The sports betting company’s stock added 2% in the premarket, ahead of the launch of legal mobile sports betting in New York State, beginning Saturday morning.

    Visa (V) – Visa slid 1.4% in premarket trading after Mizuho downgraded the stock to “neutral” from “buy.” Mizuho cites what it sees as the permanent shortening of the “cash-to-card conversion runway” as well as increasing competition.
    Trade Desk (TTD) – The provider of programmatic advertising technology was upgraded to “buy” from “hold” at Jefferies, based on a number of key catalysts including conservative consensus estimates and a new partnership with Walmart. The stock added 4.6% in the premarket.
    Discovery (DISCA) – The media company’s stock was upgraded to “buy” from “neutral” at BofA Securities, which feels that Discovery’s upcoming merger with WarnerMedia has the potential to create a “global media powerhouse.” Discovery added 3.8% in premarket action.
    New York Times (NYT) – The newspaper publisher announced a deal to buy sports news site The Athletic for $550 million, following earlier reports that a transaction had been finalized. New York Times shares fell 1.4% in the premarket.
    Acuity Brands (AYI) – The provider of building management systems reported an adjusted quarterly profit of $2.85 per share, beating the $2.41 consensus estimate, with revenue also topping Wall Street forecasts. Acuity Brands said the company performed well in the face of supply chain challenges and unpredictable market conditions.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Goldman-backed digital bank Starling boycotts Meta over scam ads

    Starling CEO Anne Boden said her firm would no longer pay for advertising on Facebook and Instagram while scammers target customers.
    Boden has been pressuring the U.K. government to address financial fraud in new laws seeking to tackle online harms.
    While Google has already tightened its rules on financial ads, Meta is yet to take similar action.

    The Facebook and Instagram logos displayed on a smartphone with the Meta Platforms logo pictured in the background.
    Igor Golovniov | SOPA Images | LightRocket | Getty Images

    LONDON — British digital bank Starling says it is boycotting Facebook parent company Meta over its failure to tackle fraudulent financial adverts.
    Anne Boden, Starling’s CEO and founder, said her firm would no longer pay for advertising on Facebook and Instagram while scammers were targeting its customers.

    In an annual letter published Thursday, Boden said: “We want to protect our customers and our brand integrity. And we can no longer pay to advertise on a platform alongside scammers who are going after the savings of our customers and those of other banks.”
    Boden has been pressuring the U.K. government to address financial fraud in the Online Safety Bill, a sweeping set of legislation that seeks to tackle the spread of harmful content on digital platforms.
    The Online Safety Bill would place a duty of care on Big Tech companies such as Meta and Google, requiring them to take action against harmful and illegal material. Companies that fail to do so would risk facing penalties of £18 million ($24 million) or 10% of their annual global revenues, whichever amount is higher.
    Last month, a committee of lawmakers scrutinizing the bill recommended that the new legislation should cover scam ads. The U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority has previously raised the alarm about adverts promoting investment scams. These include cryptocurrency scammers using the images of celebrities to defraud consumers, for example.
    In August, Google stopped accepting ads for financial services unless the advertiser was authorized by the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority, or qualified for certain exemptions. Meta in December made a commitment to tighten its policies on financial advertising, however the firm is yet to implement these changes. Meta says it expects to do so later this year.

    “Promoting financial scams is against our policies and we’re dedicating significant resources to tackling this industry-wide issue on and off our platforms,” a Meta spokesperson told CNBC.
    “To fight this, we work not just to detect and reject scam ads on our services, but also block advertisers. While no enforcement is perfect, we continue to invest in new technologies and methods to protect people on our service from these scams.”

    Meta already has policies banning promotion of financial fraud, such as loan scams and schemes that promise high rates of returns. And the company says it prohibits ads that promise unrealistic results or guarantee a financial return.
    Boden also took aim at Facebook’s rebrand to Meta and its pivot to the so-called “metaverse,” a shared virtual reality in which users can interact with each other.
    “When I read that Facebook’s next big project, the Metaverse, is predicted to be the key driver of the growth of finance and DeFi (Decentralised Finance) in the 2020s and beyond, I know that this is likely to be both wrong and right,” she said, citing an attempt by one bank to give its customers advice in the much-hyped virtual world Second Life.
    Second Life, which failed to take off in a big way, is now viewed by some as a precursor to the metaverse.
    “While Facebook (Meta) may hold out all sorts of promises for the future, I really hope its focus on the Metaverse doesn’t become a distraction from doing what is right today, here and now in the UK of 2022,” Boden added.
    Founded in 2014, Starling has become one of the U.K.’s largest digital banking brands, with a customer base of 2.7 million. With 475,000 business accounts, the firm also controls a 7% share of the U.K.’s business banking market.
    The bank counts Goldman Sachs, the Qatar Investment Authority and Fidelity as investors, and was last valued at $1.5 billion. Its competitors include the likes of Revolut and Monzo, which were last privately valued at $33 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively.
    Boden’s attempt to pressure Meta into taking action against online fraud follows mass boycotts from major brands, which temporarily paused advertising on Facebook in 2020 for not doing enough to censor hate speech.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Bitcoin slumps to a three-month low as cryptocurrencies extend losses

    The price of bitcoin fell to $41,222.41 just after 9 p.m. ET Thursday, reaching its lowest level since Sept. 29, according to data from Coin Metrics.
    Hawkish comments from the Federal Reserve this week triggered a sell-off in global stock markets which spilled over into cryptocurrencies.
    An internet shutdown in Kazakhstan, the world’s second-largest bitcoin mining hub, is also weighing on crypto prices.

    Chukrut Budrul/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

    Bitcoin dropped to a three-month low late Thursday amid jitters over U.S. monetary policy tightening and an internet shutdown in Kazakhstan, the world’s second-biggest bitcoin mining hub.
    The price of bitcoin fell to $41,222.41 just after 9 p.m. ET Thursday, reaching its lowest level since Sept. 29, according to data from Coin Metrics. It was last trading down 0.6% at a price of $42,391.20 Friday morning.

    The world’s largest cryptocurrency began falling earlier this week after the minutes from the Federal Reserve’s December meeting hinted the U.S. central bank would dial back its pandemic-era stimulus.
    The hawkish comments triggered a sell-off in global stock markets which spilled over into cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin bulls often describe it as an asset that is uncorrelated to traditional financial markets, however experts have noticed growing parallels in the price movements of bitcoin and stocks.
    Other digital currencies continued to slide Friday, with ethereum shedding 2.3% and solana falling 4.7%.

    Another piece of news weighing on crypto prices is the Kazakhstan president’s move to shutter internet service following deadly protests against the government.
    The Central Asian country accounts for 18% of the bitcoin network’s processing power, according to the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Many crypto miners fled China for neighboring Kazakhstan over Beijing’s ban on virtual currency mining.

    Kazakhstan’s internet shutdown took as much as 15% of the network offline, according to some estimates.
    Bitcoin’s computing power “is not directly correlated to the price of Bitcoin, but it gives an indication of the network’s security, so a fall can spook investors in the short term,” Marcus Sotiriou, analyst at U.K.-based digital asset broker GlobalBlock, said in a note Thursday.

    – CNBC’s Mackenzie Sigalos contributed to this report

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    China's real estate problems are spreading even to once-healthy developers

    Shimao, one of China’s healthiest real estate developers, has reportedly defaulted — a sign of how more pain is ahead for the heavily indebted industry.
    “The reason that the market is a bit more worried about this case compared to the other developers that [fell] into trouble [is] because Shimao is considered … a relatively healthy name,” Gary Ng, Asia-Pacific economist at Natixis, said in a phone interview Friday.
    He noted that Shimao met all three of Beijing’s main requirements for developers’ debt levels, and said the company’s struggles reflected broader pressure for business transformation in the current environment.

    InterContinental Shanghai Wonderland, a luxury hotel developed by Shimao and managed by IHG, opened in 2018 and is pictured here on Oct. 11, 2020.
    Costfoto | Future Publishing | Getty Images

    BEIJING — One of China’s healthiest real estate developers has reportedly defaulted, a sign of how more pain is ahead for the heavily indebted industry.
    Shimao Group shares briefly plunged more than 17% Friday after Reuters reported the property developer failed to make full repayment on a trust loan. A subsidiary of the company subsequently said in a filing it was in talks to resolve the payment. Shares closed more than 5% lower in Hong Kong, while most major developers posted gains for the day.

    China’s massive real estate industry has come under pressure as Beijing sought to reduce developers’ reliance on debt in the last two years. Global investors have mostly focused in the last several months on China Evergrande’s ability to repay its debt and the potential spillover to China’s economy.
    In recent months, a few other developers have also started reporting financial strains. But Shimao’s troubles stand out.
    “The reason that the market is a bit more worried about this case compared to the other developers that [fell] into trouble [is] because Shimao is considered … a relatively healthy name,” Gary Ng, Asia-Pacific economist at Natixis, said in a phone interview Friday.
    He noted that Shimao met all three of Beijing’s main requirements for developers’ debt levels — the so-called “three red lines” policy which places limits on debt in relation to a company’s cash flows, assets and capital levels.
    Ng also said the company’s struggles reflected broader pressure for business transformation in the current environment.

    Investors increasingly pessimistic

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Source: CNBC, news reports
    Separately, smaller rival Guangzhou R&F Properties disclosed earlier this week that it didn’t have enough money to buy back a bond. The company attributed the shortfall to a failure to sell assets.
    Market sentiment on China’s real estate developers has grown increasingly negative over the last several months, according to Natixis’ proprietary analysis.
    Before the broader market started paying attention to Evergrande, the market in June only viewed 15% of developers as negative, the analysis found.
    That figure jumped to 35% in December, as Evergrande stopped paying investors on time and more developers began reporting financial difficulties.

    More defaults likely

    Natixis’ Ng also pointed to data on trust loans that indicate real estate companies are finding it harder to get financing. Although the total amount of capital in China’s trust category has climbed, the share of real estate has fallen from 15% in late 2019 to 12% in September 2021, he said.
    “In the future, [I] wouldn’t be surprised if there are more defaults beyond bonds, beyond loans, different types of products,” Ng said.
    He said the most likely way to ease investor worries in the sector would be news of capital injection from a state-backed fund.

    Evergrande defaulted in early December without the market shock investors had worried about a few months earlier. But the overall industry has been in a tougher situation.
    “Despite both the central government and some local governments implementing easingmeasures, China’s property markets failed to make any material improvement in December; this was especially the case in lower-tier cities,” Nomura analysts said in a Jan. 4 note.
    The firm has estimated Chinese developers face $19.8 billion in maturing offshore, U.S.-dollar denominated bonds in the first quarter, and $18.5 billion in the second. That first-quarter amount is nearly double the $10.2 billion in maturities of the fourth quarter, according to Nomura.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    A war of words ends with the Democrats in charge of a key regulator

    “POWER GRAB”. An “attempt to politicise our regulators for their own gain”. “Extremist destruction of institutional norms.” The rhetoric flying around Washington sounds like the criticism once levelled against President Donald Trump about hot-button issues from border security to pollution controls. Instead, it is Republicans who have directed these barbs at Democrats in recent days, focused on something that, on the surface, seems far duller: the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the agency tasked with protecting savers from bank busts.Listen to this storyYour browser does not support the element.Enjoy more audio and podcasts on More

  • in

    Hedge funds are selling tech shares at their fastest pace in a decade as rates spike

    Surging bond yields have triggered hedge funds to sell growth-focused technology shares at a speed not seen in the past decade.
    The hedge fund community dumped tech stocks in the four sessions between Dec. 30 and Tuesday as interest rates spiked. The four-session tech unloading marked the biggest sale in dollar terms in more than 10 years, reaching a record since Goldman Sachs’ prime brokerage started tracking the data.

    Tech stocks are seen as sensitive to rising yields because increased debt costs can hinder their growth and can make their future cash flows appear less valuable. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has sold off more than 3% this week, underperforming the S&P 500, which dipped 1% during the same period.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    The rate spike in the new year resumed Thursday, with investors assessing the Federal Reserve’s faster-than-expected policy tightening. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note hit a high of 1.75% during the session, rising for a fourth straight day. The benchmark rate ended 2021 at 1.51%.
    Yields jumped after the Fed issued on Wednesday minutes from its last meeting, which showed the central bank could become even more aggressive than expected about raising interest rates and tightening policy.

    Goldman noted that hedge funds’ selling of tech stocks is driven almost entirely by long sales, in contrast to mainly short sales seen in the last two months of 2021. The selling was driven by software and semiconductor stocks, the Wall Street firm said.
    Many Big Tech names have been under pressure. Shares of Netflix have fallen more than 8% this week. Microsoft has dropped 6% in the new year, while Alphabet fell 4%. More

  • in

    The Federal Reserve is scaring markets with the triple threat of policy tightening

    The prospect of a Fed triple threat of tightening sent the market into a tailspin on Wednesday.
    Central bankers indicated in their December minutes that they expect not only to raise rates and taper asset purchases soon — but also could be teeing up a balance sheet reduction.
    That’s important for investors because central bank liquidity has helped underpin markets during the Covid tumult.

    Investors have been preparing for the Federal Reserve to start hiking interest rates. They also know the central bank is cutting the amount of bonds it buys each month. On top of that, they figured, eventually, the tapering would lead to a reduction in the nearly $9 trillion in assets the Fed is holding.
    What they didn’t expect were all three things happening at the same time.

    But minutes from the Fed’s December meeting, released Wednesday, indicated that may well be the case.
    The meeting summary showed members ready to not only start raising interest rates and tapering bond buying, but also being prepared to engage in a high-level conversations about reducing holdings of Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities.
    While the moves are designed to fight inflation and as the jobs market heals, the jolt of a Fed triple threat of tightening sent the market into a tailspin Wednesday. The result saw stocks give back their Santa Claus rally gains and then some as the prospect of a hawkish central bank cast a haze of uncertainty over the investing landscape.
    Markets were mixed Thursday as investors tried to figure out the central bank’s intentions.
    “The reason the market had a knee-jerk reaction yesterday was it sounds like the Fed is going to come fast and furious and take liquidity out of the market,” said Lindsey Bell, chief market strategist at Ally Financial. “If they do it in a steady and gradual manner, the market can perform well in that environment. If they come fast and furious, then it’s going to be a different story.”

    Fed officials said during the meeting that they remain data-dependent and will be sure to communicate their intentions clearly to the public.
    Still, the prospect of a much more aggressive Fed was cause for worry after nearly two years of the most accommodative monetary policy in U.S. history.

    Bell said investors are likely worrying too much about policy from officials who have been clear that they don’t want to do anything to slow the recovery or to tank financial markets.
    “The Fed sounds like they’re going to be a lot quicker in action,” she said. “But the reality is we don’t honestly know how they’re going to move and when they’re going to move. That’s going to be determined over the next several months.”

    Clues coming soon

    Indeed, the market won’t have to wait long to hear where the Fed is headed.
    Multiple Fed speakers already have weighed in over the past couple days, with Governor Christopher Waller and Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari taking a more aggressive tone. Meanwhile, San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said Thursday she thinks the start of balance sheet reduction isn’t necessarily imminent.
    Chairman Jerome Powell will speak next week during his confirmation hearing, and a second time this month following the Fed meeting on Jan. 25-26, when he may strike a more dovish tone, said Michael Yoshikami, founder and chairman of Destination Wealth Management.
    One big factor Yoshikami sees is that while the Fed is determined to fight inflation, it also will have to deal with the negative impact of the omicron variant.
    “I expect the Fed to come out and say everything is based on the pandemic blowing over. But if omicron really does continue to be a problem for the next 30 or 45 days, it is going to impact the economy and might cause us to delay raising rates,” he said. “I expect that commentary to come out in the next 30 days.”
    Beyond that, there are some certainties about policy: The market knows, for instance, that the Fed starting in January will be buying just $60 billion of bonds each month — half the level it had been purchasing just a few months ago.
    Fed officials in December also had penciled in three quarter-percentage-point rate hikes this year after previously indicating just one, and markets are pricing in close to a 50-50 chance of a fourth hike. Also, Powell had indicated that there was discussion about balance sheet reduction at the meeting, though he seemed to play down how deeply his colleagues delved into the topic.
    So what the market doesn’t know right now is how aggressive the Fed will be reducing its balance sheet. It’s an important issue for investors as central bank liquidity has helped underpin markets during the Covid tumult.

    During the last balance sheet unwind, from 2017 until 2019, the Fed allowed a capped level of proceeds from its bond portfolio to run off. The cap started at $10 billion each month, then increased by $10 billion quarterly until they reached $50 billion. By the time the Fed had to retreat, it had run off just $600 billion from what had been a $4.5 trillion balance sheet.
    With the balance sheet now approaching $9 trillion — $8.3 trillion of which is comprised of the Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities the Fed has been buying — the initial view from Wall Street is that the Fed could be more aggressive this time.

    ‘Uncharted waters’

    Estimates bandied about following Wednesday’s news ranged from maximum caps of $100 billion from JPMorgan Chase to $60 billion at Nomura. Fed officials have not specified any numbers yet, with Kashkari earlier this week only saying that he sees the end of the runoff still leaving the Fed with a large balance sheet, probably bigger than before Covid.
    One other possibility is that the Fed could sell assets outright, said Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics.
    There would be multiple reasons for the central bank to do so, particularly with long-dated interest rates so low, the Fed’s bond profile being relatively long in duration and the sheer size of the balance sheet — almost twice what it was last time around.
    “While longer term yields have rebounded in recent days, if they were to remain stubbornly low and the Fed is faced with a rapidly flattening yield curve, we think there would be a good case that the Fed should supplement its balance sheet runoff with outright sales of longer-dated Treasury securities and MBS,” Pearce said in a note to clients.
    That leaves investors with a multitude of possibilities that could make navigating the 2022 landscape difficult.
    In that last tightening cycle, the Fed waited from the first hike before it started cutting the balance sheet. This time, policymakers seem determined to get things moving more quickly.
    “Markets are concerned that we’ve never seen the Federal Reserve both lift interest rates off zero and reduce the size of its balance sheet at the same time. There was a two-year gap between those two events in the last cycle, so it is a valid concern. Our advice is to invest/trade very carefully the next few days,” DataTrek co-founder Nick Colas said in his daily note Wednesday evening. “We’re not predicting a meltdown, but we get why the market swooned [Wednesday]: these are truly uncharted waters.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stock futures inch higher ahead of key jobs report

    U.S. stock index futures were little changed during overnight trading on Thursday, ahead of Friday’s key jobs report.
    Futures contracts tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 65 points. S&P 500 futures advanced 0.2%, while Nasdaq 100 futures added 0.3%.

    During regular trading the Dow fell 170 points, or 0.47%, while the S&P declined 0.1%. Both are on track for their first negative week in three. The Nasdaq Composite slid 0.13% for its seventh negative session in the last eight.
    All eyes are on Friday’s nonfarm payrolls report. Economists are expecting the economy to have added 422,000 jobs in December, according to estimates compiled by Dow Jones. The unemployment rate is expected to come in at 4.1%.
    “Homebase data points to surging payrolls in December, but December figures will not yet capture the impact of the surging Omicron variant on employment,” noted Lauren Goodwin, economist and portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments.
    U.S. weekly jobless claims totaled 207,000 for the week ended Jan. 1, the Labor Department said Thursday. The reading was higher than the expected 195,000. But the private sector added 807,000 jobs in December, ADP said Wednesday, which was significantly higher than the expected 375,000.
    Stocks’ declines over the last two days follow the release of the minutes from the Federal Reserve’s December meeting. The central bank is ready to dial back its economic help at a faster rate than some had anticipated.

    “A shift in Fed policy often injects volatility into markets,” said Keith Lerner, chief market strategist at Truist. “Stocks have generally had positive performance during periods where the Fed is raising short-term rates because this is normally paired with a healthy economy.”
    “The dip in stocks seems a bit overdone,” added UBS Global Wealth Management in a note to clients. “The normalization of Fed policy shouldn’t dent the outlook for corporate profit growth, which remains on solid footing due to strong consumer spending, rising wages, and still-easy access to capital.”
    The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury hit 1.75% on Thursday, sharply higher than last week’s 1.51% level. The move higher has hit growth-oriented areas of the market, since promised future profits start to look less compelling. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite is on track for its worst week since February 2021 as investors rotate out of growth and into value names.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More