More stories

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket: Virgin Galactic, Dell Technologies, Alibaba and more

    Take a look at some of the biggest movers in the premarket:
    Virgin Galactic (SPCE) – Virgin Galactic is delaying its first commercial research space mission after a third-party supplier warned of a potential defect in a component of the flight control system. Virgin Galactic shares slid 3.4% in the premarket.

    Dell Technologies (DELL) – Dell added 2.1% in premarket action after Goldman Sachs added the computer maker’s stock to its “Conviction Buy” list. Goldman cited strong cash flow generation and debt paydown plans, among other factors.
    TransUnion (TRU) – TransUnion announced a deal to buy closely held information services company Neustar for $3.1 billion in cash. The credit reporting agency expects the deal to close during the fourth quarter.
    Viacom (VIAC) – Viacom is planning a revamp of its Paramount Pictures unit, according to people familiar with the matter who spoke to The Wall Street Journal. The revamp, which would separate the TV and film operations, could be announced as soon as today. Viacom rose 1% in the premarket.
    Kansas City Southern (KSU) – Kansas City Southern said the latest takeover bid from Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) is superior to the one it previously agreed to with Canadian National Railway (CNI). Canadian National now has five days to improve its offer, should it choose to do so. Canadian Pacific rallied 2.1% in premarket trading.
    Walt Disney (DIS) – Disney will show the remainder of its 2021 movie releases exclusively in theaters, rather than making them simultaneously available on its Disney+ streaming service. Disney’s “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the 10 Rings” topped the weekend box office once again following its record Labor Day weekend performance, with that movie showing exclusively in theaters.

    Alibaba (BABA) – Alibaba fell 1.6% in premarket action following a Financial Times report that the Chinese government wants to break up Alipay, the digital payments company owned by Jack Ma’s Ant Group. Alibaba has a one-third stake in Ant Group.
    Apple (AAPL) – Epic Games will appeal Friday’s ruling that Apple’s app store was not an illegal monopoly. Epic did win a partial victory in the case, with the judge ruling that Apple must allow developers to include external payment links.
    Carlyle Group (CG) – Carlyle is considering a $6 billion sale or initial public offering for packaging company Novolex, according to a Bloomberg report. The private-equity firm bought Novolex for an undisclosed amount in November 2016.
    MGM Resorts (MGM) – MGM rose 1.7% in the premarket after Bernstein upgraded the resort operator’s stock to “outperform” from “market perform,” citing its strong presence in the gaming and sports betting industry as well as moves to divest the company’s real estate portfolio.
    Pfizer (PFE) – Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine – developed in conjunction with German partner BioNTech (BNTX) – could be authorized for use in children aged 5-11 as soon as next month, according to two sources familiar with the situation who spoke to Reuters. Pfizer is expected to have enough study data by then to submit an application for emergency use authorization to the Food and Drug Administration. BioNTech added 1.1% in premarket trading.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    China's booming electric car industry is much bigger than just Nio and Xpeng

    The number of new Chinese businesses related to “new energy vehicles” surged by 81,000 this year through mid-August, bringing the total to more than 321,000, Qichacha said in a report.

    SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co. electric vehicles are plugged in at charging stations at a roadside parking lot in Liuzhou, China, on Monday, May 17, 2021.
    Qilai Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    BEIJING — While investors watched dramatic surges in the stock prices of Chinese electric car makers like Nio and Xpeng, tens of thousands of companies jumped on the bandwagon as the industry grew, according to business database Qichacha.
    The number of new Chinese businesses related to “new energy vehicles” surged by 81,000 this year through mid-August, bringing the total to more than 321,000, Qichacha said in a report.

    The growth this year comes after 78,600 businesses entered the industry in 2020, during the height of the coronavirus pandemic in China, the database showed.

    New energy vehicles refers to a general category consisting primarily of pure-electric and hybrid-powered cars. China is the world’s largest market for automobiles, and would like 20% of new cars sold to be new energy vehicles by 2025.
    Shares of major electric car makers fell Monday after China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology indicated there could be sector consolidation.
    “Our businesses need to be bigger and stronger,” Minister Xiao Yaqing said at a press conference.
    “Right now the number of new energy vehicle businesses is too great, and is in a small and scattered state,” the minister said, according to a CNBC translation of a Chinese transcript.

    “This is just version 2.0 of the central government looking to trim the [number] of entrants as they did when they limited manufacturing licenses [and] permits in 2017,” said Tu Le, founder of Beijing-based advisory firm Sino Auto Insights.
    “They likely [saw] a buildup of overcapacity [and] too many brands that won’t be able to compete in the market with product,” he said. “This has happened often in the Chinese market across sectors and leads to a race to the bottom where companies compete solely on price. It stresses the entire sector since these non-competitive companies are happy to throw good money after the bad.”
    Tu added that he expects China’s top electric-car makers Nio, Xpeng Li Auto and Warren Buffett-backed BYD to benefit from efforts to consolidate the industry “since it’ll eliminate potential competitors and perhaps allow them to acquire a team or technology to enhance their products.”

    Read more about electric vehicles from CNBC Pro

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    China's hog farmers struggle as pork prices swing and throw off debt-fueled expansion plans

    In less than three years, the gross debt of the top five Chinese pork producers increased by nearly threefold, S&P Global Ratings said in a report Wednesday.
    The outbreak of African swine fever beginning in 2018 decimated herds, and lured many businesses into China’s hog industry to take advantage of high prices, government subsidies and easy financing.
    But the rush to expand pork production means the indebted companies now face pork prices that have lost half their value in less than two years.

    A breeder feeds piglets at a pig farm on May 13, 2020, in Bijie, Guizhou Province of China.
    Visual China Group | Getty Images

    BEIJING — Massive swings in pork prices in the last two years are roiling China’s hog farm industry.
    To capitalize on a doubling in prices in 2019, the five largest pork producers sought to expand quickly and increased their gross debt by nearly threefold over 2.5 years, S&P Global Ratings said in a report Wednesday.

    But pork prices have tumbled just as quickly as they rose, pressuring the now-indebted producers. The consumer price index released Thursday showed prices for the Chinese meat staple fell 44.9% in August from a year ago.

    An outbreak of African swine fever beginning in 2018 swiftly decimated China’s hog production by about 40%, according to Flora Chang, associate director at S&P Global Ratings, and an author of the report.
    “The high price lured large pork producers to produce more. … They borrowed aggressively to fund expansion,” she said, noting that due to the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, financing was easily available.
    Entrepreneurs and companies also rushed to take advantage of government subsidies. Zhejiang province promised 1500 yuan or $231 for every breeding sow.
    Three years later, that’s produced a glut of supply. Pork prices have plunged to around 20 yuan per kilogram ($1.40 per pound), near the same level of early 2019, according to wholesale price data from the agriculture ministry. At their peak in late 2019 and early 2020, pork prices were near 50 yuan per kilogram or higher, the data showed.

    Planning challenges

    The unprecedented price swings have complicated hog producers’ efforts to finance potential growth.
    With limited “ability to plan according to price projections,” the S&P report noted how companies were suddenly bearing extremely high levels of debt. The analysts said that in the 12 months through June 30, hog producer Wens Foodstuff saw its debt-to-earnings (before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) ratio jump to more than ninefold, up from 1.9 times in 2020.
    However, the report noted that Muyuan was less affected by African swine fever and its debt leverage rose only slightly, to 1.3 times from 1, in the 12 months through the end of June.

    Government efforts to stabilize prices

    Pork is a primary part of Chinese diets and the government has worked to ensure sufficient supply by releasing the meat from national reserves during shortages, and, more recently, encouraging consumption to counter oversupply.
    “Recently [pork] prices have fallen very quickly, and [we] hope everyone can take advantage of this opportunity to eat more pork, buy more pork,” Ma Youxiang, deputy minister of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, said at a press conference on Sept. 1. That’s according to a CNBC translation of the Chinese statement.
    The tone was different in 2019, when authorities spoke of encouraging production of not only pork but poultry and beef in order to stabilize prices.
    Stock investors also poured in, sending shares of major hog producers like New Hope soaring 174% in 2019. But after additional gains of 16% last year, the stock is down more than 45% for the year so far.
    “The drop in pork prices directly affects corporate profits,” said Bai Xubo, securities affairs representative at New Hope, noting supply of pork is expected to remain in a surplus, with high levels of imported frozen meat and a backlog at ports while consumer demand remains weak.
    That’s according to a CNBC translation of a Chinese statement Thursday.
    Bai remained confident in the foundation of the company’s core business and said the real competitive advantage comes from efforts to improve efficiency. New Hope can also use pork futures and business developments in slaughtering and processing to hedge against price fluctuations.

    Read more about China from CNBC Pro

    It takes about nine to ten months to raise a pig from sow pregnancy to sale, S&P’s Chang said.
    That’s left time for smaller farmers to come into the market when pork prices rise.
    In fact, the almost non-existent barrier to entry in the hog industry right now in China has created price volatility of about 10 yuan to 20 yuan every few years as farmers try to ride price changes, Chang said. “Now with [African swine fever] and rising environmental standards, you might see higher barriers to entry.”
    The analysts expect the market share of the top five producers will likely rise to more than 15%, versus 10.5% in June and compared with 30% for the top five players in the U.S.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    Stock futures are modestly higher after Dow, S&P post five straight days of losses

    U.S. stock index futures were modestly higher during overnight trading on Sunday as the S&P 500 comes off its longest daily losing streak since February. Fears over slowing economic growth and rising inflation have weighed on the market.
    Futures contracts tied to Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 91 points. S&P 500 futures advanced 0.26%, while Nasdaq 100 futures were up 0.24%.

    All three major averages finished lower on Friday, with the Dow and S&P posting a fifth straight day of losses, while the Nasdaq Composite registered its third consecutive negative session.
    For the week, the Dow and S&P dipped 2.15% and 1.69%, respectively, which was each average’s worst weekly performance since June. The tech-heavy Nasdaq posted its worst week since July, sliding 1.61%.
    Data released Friday showed that producer prices rose 0.7% in August and 8.3% year over year, which was the biggest annual increase since records were first kept in November 2010.
    The closely watched consumer price index will be released on Tuesday, at which point the Street will see how much of the heightened costs are being passed along to consumers. Economists surveyed by FactSet are expecting the reading to show that consumer prices jumped 5.3% on an annual pace in August. Retail sales data will be released later in the week.
    “Supply bottlenecks, inventory shortages, higher commodity prices, and higher shipping rates have all contributed to higher input costs,” noted Charlie Ripley, senior investment strategist for Allianz Investment Management. “[Friday’s] data on wholesale prices should be eye-opening for the Fed, as inflation pressures still don’t appear to be easing and will likely continue to be felt by the consumer in the coming months,” he added.

    Stocks have been under pressure since August’s jobs report, released by the Labor Department on September 3, missed expectations. Worries are rippling through the market that the pandemic will continue to hamper economic growth while hot inflation will prompt the Federal Reserve to take action.
    “The negative impact of the delta variant on the cyclical trade is clear,” noted strategists at Jefferies. “It is increasingly evident that the impact of delta has delayed any Federal Reserve attempt at tapering, just as it has given fresh momentum to the Big Tech stocks with growth outperforming value so far this quarter.”
    The Federal Reserve will begin its two-day policy meeting on September 21, where investors will be looking for clues about the central bank’s bond-buying program.
    Despite last week’s losses, the major averages are still relatively close to their record levels. the Dow is 2.87% from its all-time high, while the S&P is 1.92% below its high-water mark. The Nasdaq Composite, meanwhile, has slid 1.87% from its record.
    For the year all three have registered double-digit percentage gains, but the ongoing impact from Covid-19 could slow the pace of recovery.
    “The outlook for post-pandemic economic growth has cooled in time for autumn,” Goldman Sachs said Friday in a note to clients. “Within the market, pricing for months has reflected the weakening economic environment,” the firm said. Last week Goldman cut its GDP growth projection for the fourth quarter, citing the delta variant’s impact on consumer spending.

    Become a smarter investor with CNBC Pro. Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV. Sign up to start a free trial today

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    A perfect storm for container shipping

    A GIANT SHIP wedged across the Suez canal, record-breaking shipping rates, armadas of vessels waiting outside ports, covid-induced shutdowns: the business of container shipping has rarely been as dramatic as it has in 2021. The average cost of shipping a standard large container (a 40-foot-equivalent unit, or FEU) has surpassed $10,000, some four times higher than a year ago (see chart). The spot price for sending such a box from Shanghai to New York, which in 2019 would have been around $2,500, is now close to $15,000. Securing a late booking on the busiest route, from China to the west coast of America, could cost $20,000. In response, some companies are resorting to desperate measures. Peloton, a maker of pricey exercise bikes, is switching to air freight. But costs are also sky-high—double those in January 2020—as capacity, half usually provided in the holds of passenger jets, is constrained by curbs on international flights. Home Depot and Walmart, two American retailers, have chartered ships directly. Pressing inappropriate vessels into service has proved near-calamitous. An attempt in July to carry containers on a bulk carrier, which generally carts coal or iron ore, was hastily abandoned when the load shifted, forcing a return to port. More containers are travelling across Asia by train. Some are even reportedly being trucked from China to Europe then shipped across the Atlantic to avoid clogged Chinese ports.Trains, planes and lorries can only do so much, especially when it comes to shifting goods half-way around the planet. Container ships lug around a quarter of the world’s traded goods by volume and three-fifths by value. The choice is often between paying up and suffering delays at ports stretched to capacity, or not importing at all. Globally 8m TEUs (20-foot-equivalent units) are in port or waiting to be unloaded, up by 10% year-on-year. At the end of August over 40 container ships were anchored off Los Angeles and Long Beach. These serve as car parks for containers, says Eleanor Hadland of Drewry, a shipping consultancy, in order to avoid clogging ports that in turn lack trains or lorries to shift goods to warehouses that are already full. The “pinch point”, she adds, “is the entire chain”. For years container shipping kept supply chains running and globalisation humming. With shops’ shelves fully stocked and products from the other side of the world turning up promptly on customers’ doorsteps, the industry drew barely any outside attention. Shipping was “so cheap that it was almost immaterial”, says David Kerstens of Jefferies, a bank. But now, as disruption heaps upon disruption, the metal boxes are losing their reputation for low prices and reliability. Few experts think things will get better before early next year. The prolonged dislocation could even hasten a reordering of global trade.Shipping is so strained in part because the industry, which usually steams from short-lived boom to sustained bust, was enjoying a rare period of sanity in the run-up to the pandemic. Stephen Gordon of Clarksons, a shipbroker, notes that by 2019 the industry was showing self-discipline, with the level of capacity and the order book for new ships under unaccustomed control. Then came covid-19. Expecting a collapse in trade, shipping firms idled 11% of the global fleet. In fact, however, trade held up and rates started to climb. And, flush with stimulus cash, Americans started to spend.In the first seven months of 2021 cargo volumes between Asia and North America were up by 27% compared with pre-pandemic levels, according to BIMCO, a shipowners’ association. Port throughput in America was 20% higher in the second quarter of 2021 than in 2019. The rest of the world, meanwhile, has seen little growth—northern Europe is only 1% higher. Yet rates on all routes have rocketed because ships have set sail to serve lucrative transpacific trade, starving others of capacity. A system stretched to its limits is subject to a “cascading effect”, says Eytan Buchman of Freightos, a digital-freight marketplace. Rerouting and rescheduling would once have mitigated the closure of part of Yantian, one of China’s biggest ports, in May and then Ningbo, another port, in August after covid-19 outbreaks. But without spare capacity, that is impossible. “All ships that can float are deployed,” remarks Soren Skou, boss of Maersk, the world’s biggest container-shipping firm. Empty containers are in all the wrong places. Port congestion puts ships out of service. In July the industry moved 15m containers, more than before the pandemic. Yet the average door-to-door shipping time for ocean freight has gone from 41 days a year ago to 70 days, says Freightos.Some observers think normality may return after Chinese new year next February, typically a low season. Peter Sand of BIMCO says disruptions could take a year to unwind. Lars Jensen of Vespucci Maritime, an advisory firm, notes that a dockers’ strike on America’s west coast in 2015 caused similar disruption, albeit only in the region. It still took six months to unwind the backlog. On the demand side much depends on whether the American consumer’s appetite for buying stuff continues. Although retail sales fell in July, they are still 18% above pre-pandemic levels, points out Oxford Economics, a consultancy. But even if American consumer demand slackens, firms are set to splurge as they restock inventories depleted by the buying spree and prepare for the holiday season at the end of the year. And there are signs that demand in Europe is picking up. In a sea of uncertainty, one bedrock remains. The industry, flush with profits, is reacting customarily, setting an annual record for new orders for container-ship capacity in less than eight months of this year, says Mr Sand. But with a two-to-three year wait, this release valve will not start to operate until 2023. And the race to flood the market may not match torrents of the past. There are far fewer shipyards today: 120 compared with around 300 in 2008, when the previous record was set. And shipping, responsible for 2.7% of global carbon-dioxide emissions, is under pressure to clean up its act. Tougher regulations come into force in 2023.The upshot is that the industry “will remain cyclical”, but with rates normalising at a higher level, says Maersk’s Mr Skou. Discipline may be more permanent both in ordering and managing existing capacity. More consolidation has helped—the top ten firms have 80% of capacity compared with 50-60% a decade ago. The impact of higher shipping costs depends on the type of good being transported. Those hoping to buy cheap and bulky imported goods such as garden furniture might be in for a long wait. Mr Buchman notes that current spot rates might add $1,000 to the price of a sofa travelling from China to America. Moreover, the effects on product prices so far have been dampened, as around 60% of goods are subject to contractual arrangements with shipping rates agreed in advance and only 40% to soaring spot prices.Nonetheless, for most products, shipping costs tend to be a small percentage of the overall cost. The boss of a large global manufacturer based in Europe says the extreme costs now are “bearable”. Nor might shipping rates rise that much further even if disruptions continue. CMA CGM, the third-largest container-shipping firm in the world, stunned industry watchers on September 10th when it said that it would cap spot rates for ocean freight. Others could follow suit.Decarbonisation costs mean rates will eventually settle at a higher level than those before the pandemic. Yet research by Maersk suggests that this may not affect customers much. Even if sustainable fuel cost three times as much as the dirty stuff, increasing per-container fuel cost to $1,200 across the Pacific, for a container loaded with 8,000 pairs of trainers, the impact on each item would be minimal. Instead it is the problem of reliability that may change the way firms think. “Just in time” may give way to “just in case”, says Mr Sand, as firms guard against supply shortages by building inventories far above pre-pandemic levels. Reliability and efficiency might also be hastened by the use of technology in an industry that has long resisted its implementation. As Fraser Robinson of Beacon, another digital freight forwarder, points out, supply chains can be made sturdier by using data to provide better “visibility” such as over which suppliers and shipping companies do a better or worse job of keeping to timetables and ordering goods earlier. There is so far little evidence of “nearshoring”, except in the car industry, says Mr Skou. But the combination of trade war, geopolitics and covid-related disruptions may together lead trade patterns to tilt away from China. Some Chinese firms and the companies they supply are relocating production to lower-cost countries to diversify supply chains and circumvent trade barriers. Mr Kerstens of Jefferies notes that after America under President Donald Trump imposed tariffs on China the volume of trade from China to America fell by 7% in 2019, but American imports remained stable overall as places like Vietnam and Malaysia took up the slack. Hedging against covid-19 shutdowns, particularly given China’s zero tolerance for infections, could provide another reason to move away.For their part, shipping firms may be preparing for more regionalised trade. The order book is bulging for ships of 13,000-15,000 TEU, smaller than the mega-vessels which can only be handled at the biggest ports. Vietnam opened a new deepwater terminal in January, which can handle all but those largest ships.Finding new manufacturers is hard, however, especially for complex products. And building buffers into supply chains is costly. But conversations about deglobalising are said to be starting among some makers of low-cost clothing and commodity goods. If higher costs persist and reliability remains a problem, some will judge that the advantages of proximity to suppliers will start to outweigh the costs of shipping goods made far away. Even shipping companies admit that current high rates and poor reliability make customers feel fleeced. With few alternatives to ships to move goods around, the only choice will be to move the factories that make them. More

  • in

    Democrats may rein in big estates without reforming the estate tax

    Democrats may limit some strategies used by wealthy Americans to reduce or avoid estate taxes, according to a list of potential tax reforms connected to their $3.5 trillion budget plan.
    The strategies include grantor-retained annuity trusts, intentionally defective grantor trusts and non-economic valuation discounts.
    They’re often used by multimillionaires and billionaires to gift appreciated assets to heirs tax-free while reducing the size of their taxable estate, according to experts.

    Drew Angerer | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Democrats may scuttle tactics used by the rich to pass wealth to heirs with little to no tax, part of a broader plan to raise money for an expansion of the U.S. safety net.
    Specifically, the party is considering disallowing some complex trust-planning techniques used by wealthy Americans to avoid estate tax, according to a discussion list of potential tax reforms obtained by CNBC.

    Congressional Democrats may also ask the Treasury Department to update regulations to “prevent the abuse of non-economic valuation discounts,” according to the list. This concept applies, for example, to entrepreneurs who give a minority interest in their business to their kids at a discounted rate.

    The reforms are largely aimed at multimillionaires or billionaires who use the strategies to remove wealth from their estate and transfer it to heirs tax-free, according to estate-tax experts.
    “Basically, you’ve got this basket of loopholes that collectively can be used to defeat the estate tax at really any level, even billionaires,” according to Robert Lord, counsel for progressive group Americans for Tax Fairness.
    The list, a draft of ideas lawmakers assemble before formally pitching them in the House or Senate, doesn’t contain many specifics. It identifies “grantor-retained annuity trusts” and “intentionally defective grantor trusts” as the trusts in question.
    More from Personal Finance:Top 1% dodge $163 billion in annual taxes, Treasury saysStimulus payments triggered millions of IRS ‘math error’ noticesDemocrats may change the rules for ‘mega’ IRAs over $5 million

    Interestingly, Democrats don’t seem to be weighing reforms to the estate tax itself, such as a higher tax rate or a reduced asset threshold that would subject more estates to federal levies.
    A 40% federal tax rate currently applies to estates and gifts valued at more than $11.7 million for individuals and $23.4 million for married couples.
    That asset threshold will fall after 2025 even if Democrats don’t touch it, due to sunset provisions in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. (Roughly $6 million and $12 million, respectively, would be exempt from the tax — half the current value — at that time.)

    Higher taxes

    Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-NY, on Capitol Hill on Aug. 9, 2021.
    BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI | AFP | Getty Images

    The proposed estate-tax reforms are part of Democrats’ broader theme of raising taxes on the wealthy to help fund climate, paid leave, childcare and education measures, the cost of which may be as high as $3.5 trillion.
    President Joe Biden has said households earning less than $400,000 a year would not see a higher tax bill.
    Some of the potential estate-tax reforms share elements of recent Democratic proposals, such as the “For the 99.5% Act” co-sponsored by several lawmakers like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.
    Critics argue the burden of some estate-tax reforms wouldn’t only impact the rich but would extend to others like family farmers.
    “Many Democrats love to talk about taxing the richest of the rich, but in reality, their proposals would hurt Main Street far more than Wall Street,” Rep. Glenn Thompson, R-Penn., ranking member of the House Agriculture Committee, said of the various recent estate-tax proposals.

    Grantor-retained annuity trusts

    Let’s look at grantor-retained annuity trusts, one of the techniques in question, as an example of how individuals sometimes use trusts to shield wealth from tax.
    These trusts — also known as GRATs — have been leveraged by numerous millionaires and billionaires, including the Trump family, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the Walton family (of Wal-Mart fame) and former Goldman Sachs Chairman Lloyd Blankfein. Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who died earlier this year, reportedly used the trusts to shield billions of dollars from tax.
    Individuals often use the trusts to transfer assets that are expected to grow significantly in value, according to Charlie Douglas, a certified financial planner who runs a family office in Atlanta.

    Generally, heirs benefit from tax-free appreciation and the owner reduces or avoids a federal estate or gift tax. (The concept is similar for the aforementioned intentionally defective grantor trusts and valuation discounts, Douglas said.)
    Let’s say an individual puts $1 million of stock into a GRAT with a term of two years. The stock grows 50%, or $500,000, over that period. The trust yields a double benefit: Heirs get the $500,000 growth without tax and the appreciation is removed from the owner’s estate, thereby limiting or perhaps even eliminating tax the estate owes upon the owner’s death. It becomes the equivalent of a tax-free gift. (The owner would get back the $1 million principal plus a small amount of interest.)
    Tax experts say some gaming can also occur, whereby owners intentionally lowball the value of an asset (like real estate) placed in the trust. Heirs would get more tax-free wealth as a result.
    The “For the 99.5% Act,” a guide for how Democrats may be thinking of new rules, would restrict these trusts as a wealth-transfer tool.
    The legislation would increase the amount of time assets must remain in the trust to a minimum 10 years — a potential deterrent since tax benefits are lost if the owner dies before the end of the term. Asset appreciation would also no longer be 100% tax-free, for example.
    However, these policies may not end up in a final Democrat bill, or may be significantly amended if they do.
    “If anybody says they know what’s going to happen, they’re crazy,” Douglas said.

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    60-year veteran of Wall Street Art Cashin reflects on 9/11 and what it took to rebuild

    Art Cashin reflected Friday on 9/11 and the impact the terrorist attacks 20 years ago have had on him personally and on Wall Street.
    The veteran trader was at the New York Stock Exchange on Sept. 11, 2001.
    He remained there all day, even as the markets did not open in the wake of the tragedy.

    A day before the 20th anniversary of 9/11, veteran trader Art Cashin reflected Friday on the impact of the terrorist attacks on Wall Street, the country and him personally.
    Cashin, who has been an NYSE member since 1964, was in lower Manhattan on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. He remained in the stock exchange building all day, even as the NYSE and Nasdaq did not open for trading, a rare occurrence, because of the attacks.

    Phone service was severely impaired in Manhattan that day, but those at Cashin’s post somehow remained operational, he said Friday on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” from the stock exchange, his first interview there since the Covid pandemic.
    “People were rushing up. I had a line that looked like a movie theater of people from Merrill Lynch and from the stock exchange saying, ‘Can I please use the phone to call my wife? I can’t get through to my wife. Can I call my wife?'” said Cashin, who is now director of floor operations for UBS Financial Services. “I was here until the end” of the day.

    Art Cashin on Squawk on the Street at the NYSE on Sept. 10th, 2021.

    Eventually, the 80-year-old Cashin recalled, he walked out into the ash-filled streets of the Financial District, where the World Trade Center’s 110-story twin towers had collapsed into piles of burning debris.
    “I came out and there were a bunch of guys wearing the same kinds of masks we wear now for the pandemic, catching envelopes, things falling out of the sky from the 80th floor at the World Trade Center and looking through the envelopes to see if there was money or cash,” Cashin said. “I was so incensed. I started to go after one of them, and my middle son, Peter, said to me, ‘Dad, the point now is to get home. Forget those guys. They’re garbage.'”
    Cashin said he still thinks about the nearly 3,000 people killed when the four hijacked planes crashed in New York City, Washington, D.C., and in Pennsylvania. Most of the victims were in the twin towers.

    “There were friends we’ve lost. Friends you lost, people who never got the chance to see their kids growing up, things like that. It was terribly somber,” he said.
    The U.S. stock market remained shuttered until Sept. 17, its most prolonged closure since the Great Depression.
    People viewed returning to work for the reopening of the NYSE as a statement, Cashin said, a kind of patriotic defiance and strength. “After the twin towers came down, the exchange became the No. 1 target in New York City,” said Cashin, who is known for his daily analysis and deep understanding of market history.

    Security around Wall Street is much tighter now than when Cashin began his career there, in 1959 as an assistant clerk at Thomson McKinnon. Lower Manhattan, more broadly, has become more residential in the two decades following 9/11, which Cashin said has been a welcome development and improved the liveliness of the area.
    But the weeks following the terrorist attacks were dark on and around Wall Street, he said, and it had little to do with the market’s performance.
    “We came for the next several weeks in a somewhat depressed mode. Everybody was downbeat,” he said. “The only smiles south of Canal Street were in the photos on the missing persons posters that the families put up to try and find people that had not come home.” 
    Cashin said personal lessons from 9/11 are applicable to the current moment, as New York City and the nation work to overcome the coronavirus.
    “If we get the vaccines and the variants back in order, life, hopefully, will go on,” he said. “Man is both a gregarious and optimistic animal, particularly if you’re American. Optimism is at the soul of this nation, so when you get a terrible thing like 9/11, you pull together and say, ‘OK, let’s move forward.'”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

  • in

    British fintechs are jumping into the booming buy now, pay later market

    U.K. fintech firms Monzo and Revolut are planning to launch their own buy now, pay later services.
    BNPL plans let users spread the cost of their purchases over a series of interest-free instalments.
    The BNPL space is attracting interest from major companies including PayPal, Amazon and Square.

    A Mastercard debit card from U.K. digital bank Monzo.

    LONDON — Monzo and Revolut, two of Britain’s best-known financial technology firms, are planning to enter the booming “buy now, pay later” industry.
    Buy now, pay later, or BNPL, plans are an increasingly popular method of payment that lets users spread the cost of their purchases over a series of interest-free instalments. The trend was pioneered by the likes of Swedish fintech Klarna and Australian firm Afterpay.

    It’s now attracting interest from some of the world’s biggest companies, with PayPal launching its own BNPL service, Amazon and Apple partnering with U.S. provider Affirm, and Afterpay being sold to Square, the payments company owned by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.
    Now, two of the U.K.’s hottest fintech companies are trying to get in on the action.
    Monzo, which offers checking accounts through an app, is soon set to announce plans to launch its own version of BNPL, a person familiar with the matter told CNBC.
    The person, who preferred to remain anonymous as the information is not yet public, said the digital bank would introduce affordability checks on customers.
    The news was first reported by London’s Evening Standard newspaper.

    Meanwhile, Revolut CEO Nik Storonsky told the Standard earlier this week the company was working on its own pay-later product. Revolut, a digital banking and trading app, was recently valued at $33 billion following an $800 million funding round led by SoftBank and Tiger Global.
    But Monzo, unlike Revolut, is a regulated bank in the U.K. While Revolut was granted a European banking license in Lithuania, it is currently seeking further licenses in Britain, the U.S. and Australia.
    Still, Monzo is smaller in size than Revolut, with 5 million customers and a £1.25 billion ($1.7 billion) valuation. Revolut says it now has more than 15 million users. Starling, another popular digital bank in the U.K., has over 2 million customers and was last valued at £1.1 billion.

    Regulators take notice

    While the BNPL industry is growing fast, its rapid rise hasn’t gone unnoticed by regulators.
    The British government has plans to introduce regulation for the sector. Proposals announced by the Treasury department earlier this year included the requirement that firms make affordability checks before lending to customers and the ability to escalate complaints to the U.K.’s financial ombudsman.
    According to a review published by the Financial Conduct Authority in February, the U.K.’s BNPL market is worth £2.7 billion, with 5 million Brits using such products since the start of the coronavirus pandemic. More than one in 10 customers of a major bank using BNPL services were already in arrears, the review said.
    “The FCA has already taken a significant step towards bringing BNPL into the fold, with the review they unveiled earlier this year — and they are certain to increase controls if only due to the growing popularity of BNPL in the market,” David Brear, CEO of London-based fintech consultancy 11:FS, told CNBC.”Unlike some of the other providers of BNPL in the U.K., Monzo is already a regulated entity under the FCA and wouldn’t do anything to risk their reputation with the regulator.”

    WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More