This assertion sparked a fiery response from Schwartz, who dismissed it as “complete nonsense.” He highlighted Wright’s failure to provide conclusive evidence of his identity as Nakamoto during the trial, emphasizing that other individuals, including himself, had no such motive to falsely claim authorship of Bitcoin.
Interestingly, Schwartz’s rebuttal reignited speculation surrounding his own potential connection to Nakamoto. Citing his extensive background in cryptography, dating back to the early days of the field, some theorists have posited him as a plausible candidate for Nakamoto’s identity. Schwartz’s involvement in pioneering patents related to distributed ledger technology further fueled speculation.
Despite these theories, Schwartz has consistently denied any association with Nakamoto, maintaining that he is solely an architect of XRP Ledger, distinct from Bitcoin’s genesis.
COPA, an organization dedicated to safeguarding the open-source nature of cryptocurrencies, seeks further injunctions to prevent Wright from making further claims and pursuing litigation in the crypto community.
This article was originally published on U.Today
Source: Cryptocurrency - investing.com
