Lopez Obrador defended the idea on grounds of saving public funds to allow for priority welfare and infrastructure spending.
Critics said scrapping such bodies would be a step backwards for democracy and lead to excessive concentration of power.
Sostenes Diaz Gonzalez, a commissioner of the Federal Telecommunications Institute, defended the regulator’s track record, arguing that its independence from political influence helped boost confidence in the sector and fulfilled its purpose.
“What was sought was to counteract the issue of the monopoly sectors that existed in telecommunications and broadcasting and to introduce competition … and that is precisely what happened in Mexico,” he said in an interview.
Lopez Obrador has made steep budget cuts, arguing his administration has trimmed wasteful expenditure.
He has frequently targeted so-called autonomous institutions, such as an office working on government transparency, as ineffective and expensive. On Thursday he said a science research fund was used to rent golf courses under previous governments.
He suggested the telecoms regulator had failed to rein-in monopolistic power of some companies. The IFT has been credited with reducing the market share of billionaire Carlos Slim’s America Movil (NYSE:AMX), although the company is still the largest player in the industry.
“They said that in this manner there would no be more monopolies in communications. Are there, or are there not?” he asked during a regular news conference. “We have to review all these administrative apparatus, their function, so that there’s no duplication.”
Lopez Obrador cut his own salary in 2018 to 40% of what his predecessors earned, and created a rule that no public servant should earn more than him.
Some are still earning too much, he said and added he was planning to present a bill to Congress to further clamp down on government salaries.
Source: Economy - investing.com
